<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Geomaterials</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7538</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gm.2022.123004</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GM-119246</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Bacterial Deterioration in the Limestone Minaret of Prince Muhammad and Suggested Treatment Methods, Akhmim, Egypt
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elashmawy</surname><given-names>Abd-Elkareem Ahmed</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rehab</surname><given-names>Mustafa Mohamed</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Conservation Department, Faculty of Archaeology, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>07</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>58</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>26,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret in Akhmim, Sohag, Egypt, is constructed of limestone and has been exposed to many factors of damage as a result of the high levels of ground water. Limestone is strongly affected by ground water, especially when being impure. The current work discusses the results of analytical techniques including chemical testing to determine the types of soluble salts through optical microscopy, electronic scanning electron microscope with an X-ray energy dispersion system (ESEM) to study and determine the causes of rapid degradation. Microbial weathering phenomena toward limestone were also studied. Different bacteria and fungi were isolated from outdoors and indoors of air and limestone of the building of which 
  <em>Bacillus cereus</em> OK447647, 
  <em>B. subtilis</em> OK447648, 
  <em>Serratia marcescens</em> OK447650, 
  <em>Pseudomonasoryzihabitans</em> OK447649, 
  <em>Aspergillus flavus</em>, 
  <em>A. niger</em>, 
  <em>Penicillium chrysogenum</em> and 
  <em>Cladosporium cladosporoids</em> were the most representative. 
  <em>B. cereus</em> OK447647 and 
  <em>B. subtilis</em> OK447648 have shown ability for calcium carbonate dissolving. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of sodium azide were investigated against the growth of microbial isolates. Sodium azide at 100 ppm was found to be the best treatment for bacterial isolates although it had no significant effect against fungi.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>El-Amir Muhammad’s Minaret</kwd><kwd> Limestone</kwd><kwd> XRD</kwd><kwd> Microbial Deterioration</kwd><kwd> Treatment</kwd><kwd> Sodium Azide</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The mosque and minaret of El-Amir Muhammad dates to the Ottoman technology and is known as the Mosque of the Market. It was constructed by the aid of El-Amir Muhammad, El-Amir Hassan’s father. This minaret is the most effective one left in the mosque. It is located at the western aspect of Caesarea Street (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The minaret consists of three floors. The first floor has a rectangular projection, the second is an octagonal projection, and is cylindrical in shape, crowned with the aid of the pinnacle of the minaret, that’s punctuated with the aid of using six knotted holes and the third is cylindrical in shape and is topped by the top of the minaret punctuated by six knotted slots. Many researchers have discussed the damage to archaeological Islamic minarets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref4">4</xref>]. Limestone has centuries-lengthy and global culture as a constructing material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref7">7</xref>]. Solution weathering is continual but generally unthreatening to the structure of a building. One such mechanism is salt weathering. Salts occur naturally within the atmosphere e.g. at the coast, but in polluted environments, their concentrations and variety are increased because of the chemical reactions between limestone and acid pollutants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref8">8</xref>]. The most ordinarily salt produced by this reaction is calcium sulphate (gypsum) which is the most often salt related to weathered limestone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref10">10</xref>]. On drought, the salt crystals precipitate either on the surface, or within the pores of the stone. This can cause dislodgement of individual grains (granular disintegration) or the event of scales and flakes of stone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref12">12</xref>]. Salt weathering is most cases natural stone decay, and as a consequence, there is a significant problem with the conservation of cultural heritage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref13">13</xref>]. Dissolved salts such as, sulfate, chloride, sodium nitrate, potassium, magnesium, ammonium and calcium are major factors in the damage of porous materials such as limestone. The rate of spoilage is also attributed to the behavior of salt with limestone, leading to deep crushing, partial and surface cracking, grain damage and pits as well as physical stress as a result of crystallization, hydration and differential thermal expansion.</p><p>The biodeterioration of monumental heritage is a worldwide phenomenon; it represents a significant loss of cultural heritage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref14">14</xref>]. Microbial biodeterioration</p><p>is one of the main causitive of archeological rocks deterioration especially in museums and mosques [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p>Stone surfaces and paintings of monuments are exposed to continuous biodegradation and biodeterioration agents, such as microbial communities colonizing stone surface and paintings consisting of a great number and diversity of microorganisms, such as bacteria, action bacteria, fungi, and yeast [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>The biodeterioration of archeological stones works occurs as a consequence of biofilm production, secretion and deposition of organic and inorganic compounds and physical penetration of microbes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref19">19</xref>] <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(e) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(f). The growth and activity of the microorganisms on stone surface results in major alterations such as surface alterations (etching, pitting, stratification, etc), staining or color alteration, bio-weathering (stone dissolution), bio corrosion and transformation of crystal into small size one [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref20">20</xref>]. The monitoring of microbial contamination represents the basis for a proper conservation strategy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>The present work aimed to investigate and identify the biological cause of archeological limestone biodeterioration from El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret in Akhmim-Egypt and suggest methods of treatment.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Collection of Limestone Samples</title><p>Limestone samples were collected from the study site (El-Amir Muhammad’s Minaret, Akhmim, Sohag, Egypt) by non-destructive methods.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Petrographic Examination</title><p>Nikon polarizing microscope (JEOL JSM5500LV) was used in the petrographic study of limestone samples.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. XRay Diffraction (XRD)</title><p>XRD Unit, Faculty of Science, Assuit University, Model PW 1710 control unit, Philips, 2θ from 4 to 60, Anode Material Cu, 40 K.V, 30 M.A.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Chemical Study by XRF</title><p>Identification of the chemical composition of limestone samples was carried out using (Axios Advanced, Sequential wd_ XRF Spectrometer, PANalytical 2005) in the Analysis Unit of the National Center for Building Materials Research in Cairo.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)</title><p>SEM was used to study and understand the fine structure, decomposition, and different properties of the limestone under study. It was carried out in the Central Lab, South Valley Univ. using JEOLJSM-5500 LV SEM (JEOL, Japan).</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Isolation of Airborne Microorganisms</title><p>The settle plate method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref22">22</xref>] was used to estimate the airborne spores in of El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret. Nutrient agar and Czapek’s (CZ) agar media were used for isolation of bacteria and fungi, respectively. The plates were exposed for five minutes. Nutrient agar plates were incubated at 37˚C for 72 h while CZ plates were incubated at 28˚C for 7 days. The developed colonies were counted in plates and the average number of colonies per three plates was determined.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Isolation of Microorganisms from Deteriorated Limestone</title><p>Dry cotton swabs were rubbed on the surface of the deteriorated parts of the building over an area of 4 cm<sup>2</sup>, under aseptic conditions, stored at 4˚C until used for inoculation as mentioned previously.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Identification of Bacterial Isolates</title><p>The bacterial isolates were tentatively identified on the basis of classification schemes published in Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref23">23</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_9"><title>2.9. Molecular Identification of the Common Bacterial Isolates</title><p>The Bacterial isolates were cultured in sterile test tubes containing 10 ml of nutrient broth medium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref24">24</xref>]. The cultures was incubated at 28˚C for 48 hours, then sent to the molecular Biology Research Unit, Assiut University for DNA extraction using Patho-gene-spin DNA/RNA extraction kit provided by Intron Biotechnology Company, Korea. From each sample the DNA was sent to SolGent Company, Daejeon South Korea for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and gene sequencing. PCR was performed using two universal primers where 27F (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3') and 1492R (5'-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3') were used. The purified PCR products (amplicons) were reconfirmed using a size nucleotide marker (100 base pairs) by electrophoreses on 1% agarose gel. The amplicons were sequenced with the incorporation of dideoxynucleotides (dd NTPs) in the reaction mixture. Bacterial amplicons were sequenced in the sense and antisense directions using 27F and 1492R primers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref25">25</xref>]. Sequences were further analyzed using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) from the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website. Phylogenetic analysis of sequences was done with the help of MegAlign (DNA Star) software version 5.05. Sequences were aligned with others retrieved from Gen Bank using ClustalX [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref26">26</xref>] and optimized manually. The positions where one or more species contained a length mutation and ambiguously aligned regions were not included in the subsequent phylogenetic analysis. Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses were made in PAUP 4 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref27">27</xref>]. Maximum-parsimony (MP) trees were obtained by 100 random addition heuristic search replicates, and 1000 bootstrap replicates were performed employing 5 random addition heuristic searches. Maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref28">28</xref>] was performed using heuristic searches with the random stepwise addition of 100 replicates and tree bisection-reconnection (TBR) rearrangements. The optimal model of nucleotide substitution for the ML analyses was determined using hierarchical likelihood ratio tests (hLRTs) Model test 3.7 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref29">29</xref>]. The model selected as the best fit for 16s rDNA dataset was TrN. Phylogenetic trees were visualized using Njplot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref30">30</xref>] and edited in Adobe Illustrator CS6.</p></sec><sec id="s2_10"><title>2.10. Identification of Fungal Isolates</title><p>Identification of fungal isolates was performed according to Raper and Thom (1949) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref31">31</xref>]; Gilman (1957) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref32">32</xref>]; Domsch (1980) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref33">33</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_11"><title>2.11. Screening for Calcium Carbonate-Dissolving G Microorganisms</title><p>Bacterial and fungal isolates were tested for calcium carbonate dissolution by growing colonies on Deveze-Bruni (DB) medium, consists of (g∙L<sup>−1</sup>): glucose, 5 g; yeast extract, 1 g; peptone, 1 g; K<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>, 0.5 g; MgSO<sub>4</sub>, 0.01 g, NaCl, 5 g; NH<sub>4</sub>(SO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>, 0.05 g; MgCl<sub>2</sub>, CaCO<sub>3</sub> 5 g and 1.5% agar), bacteria were incubated at 37˚C for 7 days, fungi were incubated at 8˚C for 14 days [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref34">34</xref>]. Bacteria and fungi that dissolve CaCO<sub>3</sub> can be distinguished due to the apparent halo of a clear zone around the colony.</p></sec><sec id="s2_12"><title>2.12. Determination of the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of (Sodium Azide) against Isolated Microorganisms</title><p>The microcide solution was prepared by dissolving sodium azide ethyl alcohol 95% to give concentrations ranging from 50 up to 150 &#181;g/l (ppm). The most dominant bacterial and fungal isolates were treated by different concentrations (25, 50, 100 and 150) ppm of sodium azide using the agar well diffusion method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref35">35</xref>]. Control without microcide was done using ethyl alcohol. Inhibition zones were measured to determine the minimum inhibition concentration</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Weathering of Limestone</title><p>In the present case, limestone in general is quite homogeneous in its chemical characteristics, being dominated by CaCO<sub>3</sub>, but is highly variable in terms of physical characteristics such as hardness, fossil content and porosity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref37">37</xref>]. Limestone, which is often used in stone construction, where the effects of sulfate attack appear very quickly, especially in cases of stone damage, the formation of gypsum crusts, results in stone cracking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref38">38</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c)). Humidity increases the chances of damage due to wet and dry thawing and freezing. Where the soluble salts move in and out of the components of the porous stones. Seasonal changes in soil and temperature also control, which leads to the appearance of salt flowers that are soluble (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). Weathering is also related to mechanical strength, water absorption and permeability of the stone and treatment work must include the estimation and improvement of these properties. The pore space in the weathering zone of limestone becomes clogged when the process of recrystallization of the salts takes place as a result of damage to its components and cause discoloration of limestone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref39">39</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)). Water has an important role in the damage of limestone because it is highly polar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref40">40</xref>]. It also helps in the rate of deterioration of limestone, the high content of clay minerals, which are expandable minerals. The extent of the ability of limestone to absorb moisture is expressed in estimating the clay minerals content, as water retention is a result of the presence of clay minerals in the pores. The presence of clay minerals in the formation of limestone in addition to the characteristics of limestone such as its high porosity causes severe damage to limestone caused separation and loss of some stone blocks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(d)). Many cracks were observed due to swelling and contraction of the components of the clay minerals due to changes in relative humidity, and the expansion and contraction of the degraded limestone components as a result of the changing temperature cycles. The degree and depth of damage also indicates that the components of the minaret have been damaged by water due to previous treatments, as they appear as visible white sediments caused by microbiological damage on the stone surface <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(e) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(f).</p><p>Optical microscopy revealed some details such as porosity, fine cracks and grain morphology, the grains formed a fragmented matrix of heterogeneous, non-solid powders, with a large amount of fine cracks. The study showed that the limestone grains contain skeletal and fossil parts of fossils of the foraminifera, especially the nemolite, which consist of calcium carbonate CaCO<sub>3</sub> and dolomite, were found to fill the cracks and dissolve with some traces of gypsum CaSO<sub>4</sub>∙2H<sub>2</sub>O. Note calcite sparite in the inner spaces of the fossils, and the main mineral is micritic calcite as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>XRD results showed that calcite (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) is the main component of limestone samples, and the presence of CuFeNaS<sub>2</sub> compound is an indicator of the presence of gypsum and halite with gypsum (CaSO<sub>4</sub>∙2H<sub>2</sub>O) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>Unexpectedly, XRD analyzes failed to determine the presence of aluminum silicate or clay minerals, as this was inconsistent with the results obtained from ESEM-EDS analyzes, where the latter was able to detect aluminum silicate within the polished samples and this may be due to the presence of compounds Clay</p><p>minerals in amounts below the detection level of XRD analyzes in the analyzed samples (about 5%).</p><p>Scanning electron microscope (SEM) in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> clearly show that there are details in the morphology of the stone surface, especially the appearance of small and round white particles, and the preliminary analysis showed the presence of calcium (Ca), carbon (C) and oxygen (O) in most of the samples, which may indicate that these particles calcium carbonate. The grain distribution appeared inhomogeneous as silicon (Si) and aluminum (Al) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>, which indicates the presence of aluminum silicate minerals (clay minerals), where they are found in the thin regions between the white particles as revealed by SEM images. The presence of fossil mollusks distributed throughout the matrix, and this indicates the origins of the limestone under study.</p><p>XRF study that Aluminum oxide Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> shows an average percentage of 0.8102% which could be indicate to presence of clay minerals, and magnesium oxide MgO shows an average percentage of 0.5043% and ferric oxide Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> show an average percentage of 1.1726% and SO<sub>3</sub> shows an average percentage of 0.5672% which indicates to the presence of gypsum where Gypsum is formed when calcium carbonates CaCO<sub>3</sub> react with sulfur dioxide SO<sub>2</sub> <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Identification of the Bacterial Isolates</title><p>Based on morphological, physicochemical and physiological characterization (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), isolated bacteria were tentatively identified as Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, Micrococcus ruseus, Micrococcus luteus, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptomyces sp. Pseudomonas oryzihabitans and Serratia marcescens.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Phylogenetic Analyses of Common Bacterial Strains</title><p>The 16S rDNA dataset included 20 sequences: 10 belong to the family Bacillaceae, 5 Pseudomonadaceae and 5 Yersiniaceae. The maximum parsimony dataset consisted of a total of 350 characters, of which 257 were constant, 9 variables and parsimony-uninformative and 84 were counted as parsimony-informative. Maximum parsimony produced 15 most parsimonious trees all had a length of 135 steps, a consistency index of 0.8889, a retention index of 0.9716, and a rescaled consistency index of 0.8637 and of which one is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>. Maximum likelihood analysis yielded a single most likely tree (–ln likelihood = 1135.93). Bayesian analysis yielded two trees similar in topology to the ML phylogenetic tree shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>. The four bacterial strains nested within the genera: Bacillus (two species), Pseudomonas and Serratia. The bacterial strain</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical analysis of limestone by XRF</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Main Constituents Wt%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >(a)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >(c)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9916</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9817</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9923</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0282</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0281</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0278</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AI<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8104</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> tot.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1727</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1725</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1728</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5041</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5043</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.7570</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.7560</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.7579</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4864</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4867</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4860</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3787</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3782</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3785</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5676</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5671</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5670</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0621</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0623</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0628</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2126</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2129</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0289</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0284</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0287</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Morphological, physicochemical and biochemical characteristics of bacterial isolates recovered from outdoors and indoors of El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus cereus OK447647</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillussubtilis OK447648</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Micrococcus ruseus</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Micrococcus luteus</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Staphylococcus aureus</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Streptomyces sp.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas oryzihabitans OK447649</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Serratiamarcescens OK447650</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gram stain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shape</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bacilli</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bacilli</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cocci (tetrads)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cocci (tetrads)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cocci (tetrads)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >filamentous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacilli (short)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacilli (short)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Major pigment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >rose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >orange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >white</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >red</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrate reduction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acid from glucose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Catalase test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >V-P test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O-F test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Starch hydrolysis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gelatin hydrolysis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Casein hydrolysis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urease test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Citrate test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Growth on 7% NaCl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acid and gas from glucose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Growth at 65˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Growth at 50˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Growth at 41˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Growth at 4˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arginine hydrolysis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lipase production</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Growth on King A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Growth on King B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>+ve = Positive, −ve = Negative, ND = Not Detected, O = Oxidative, F = Fermentative.</p><p>RM1 was grouped with Bacillusproteolyticus and B. albus in all the phylogenetic analyses perfor/med with high statistical support (93/89/100 for MP/ML/BYPP, respectively), while the bacterial strain RM2 was grouped with Bacillus subtilis and B. pizizenii with high statistical support (91/97/100 for MP/ML/BYPP, respectively). The third strain RM3 was grouped with Pseudomonas sp. (KP720613)</p><p>and P. oleovorans with high statistical support (93/89/100 for MP/ML/BYPP, respectively) and the fourth strain RM was grouped with several strains of Serratia marcescens (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Estimation of Airborne Microorganisms</title><p>Six airborne bacterial genera: Bacillus, Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, Streptomyces Pseudomonas and Serratia were recovered from out and indoor of El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret. The data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> show what Bacillus cereus OK447647 and B. subtilis OK447648 were the most common and the most frequent as well comprising (53.9%; 43.3% and 30.5%; 33.9%) of total counts from outdoor sand indoors, respectively. Gram negative bacteria were identified as Pseudomonas oryzihabitans OK447649 and Serratia marcescens OK447650 comprising (0.4%; 0.3% and 0.9%; 0.5%) of total counts from outdoor and indoor bacterial isolates, respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage contribution of microorganisms recovered from outdoor and indoor of El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Isolated microorganisms</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Percentage (%) counts</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Airborne</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Limestone surface</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Outdoor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Indoor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Outdoor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Indoor</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus cereus OK447647</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. subtilis OK447648</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Micrococcus ruseus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. luteus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Staphylococcus aureus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Streptomyces sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serratia marcescens OK447650</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas oryzihabitans OK447649</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus flavusLink</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. niger Tiegh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. sydowi (Bainier &amp; Sartory) Thom and Church</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. nidulans (Eidam) G. Winter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. terreus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. galaucus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Penicillium chrysogenum Thom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. corylophyllum DiercKX DiercKX</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cladosporium cladosporoids (Frsen) G. A. de Vries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alternaria alternate (Fr) Keissl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ulocladium charatum (preuss) E. G. Simmons</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Curvularia lanata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Syncephalustrum rhizopi Vuill</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mucor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sterile mycelia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Data in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a) also reveal that Bacillus cereus was dominant, it was recorded from 100% of samples collected from indoor and outdoor aerosols of El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret, followed by Staphylococcus aureus and Streptomyces (60%; 100% and 60%; 60%), Serratia marcescens OK447650 and Pseudomonas oryzihabitans OK447649 were less frequent, in outdoors and indoors, respectively.</p><p>These results agree with the studies presented by Carlo et al. (2016) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref41">41</xref>] who isolated spore forming bacteria: Bacillus thuringiensis and B. weihenstephanensis from the Saints Cave environment. On the other hand<sup>,</sup> Awad (2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref42">42</xref>] reported that Micrococci and Bacillus isolated from aerosols in a four-storey flourmill building located in Giza, Egypt were dominant where Gram-negative bacteria were found in low numbers.</p><p>The concentration and variability of the indoor airborne microbes can be affected by several factors, such as the infiltration of the outdoor air, the human presence and activities which give a good reason for the recognized increase of outdoor microbial counts compared to those of indoor counts of El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret. These findings come in agreement with Katsivela et al. 2021 and Stelzenbach 2002 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref43">43</xref>]. On the other hand, Rajendran and Prasad (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref44">44</xref>] concluded that the numbers outdoor aeroflora higher compared to the indoor aeroflora of Vishnu temple in India.</p><p>B. cereus and B. subtilis were the most dominant among airborne bacteria recovered from El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret, where Gram-negative bacteria were less frequent, these results agree with the studies presented by Carlo et al. (2016) who isolated spore forming bacteria: Bacillus thuringiensis and B. weihenstephanensis from the Saints Cave environment. On the other hand<sup>,</sup> Awad (2007) reported that Micrococci and Bacillus isolated from aerosols in a four-storey flourmill building located in Giza, Egypt were dominant where Gram-negative bacteria were found in low numbers.</p><p>Data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b) show that eleven airborne fungal species belonging to five genera were recovered from out and indoor of El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret. Aspergillus was the most prevalent genus represented by six species of which Aspergillusflavus was dominant it was recovered from 100% of samples comprising (34.2% and 23.8%) of total fungi from outdoors and indoors, respectively. Penicilliumchrysogenum was of moderate occurrence comprising (26.3% and 14.3%) of total fungi from outdoors and indoors, respectively, followed by Cladosporiumcladosporoids representing (10.5% and 22.2%) and was recorded from (100% and 80%)% of total fungi from outdoors and indoors, respectively. Lower frequencies were revealed by other genera as Alternariaand Syncephalustrum.</p><p>Among airborne fungi isolated from outdoor and indoor of El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret, Aspergillus flavus, A. niger and Penicillium chrysogenum were the most frequent. The presence of Alternaria alternate and Cladosporium cladosporoids was pointed out. Similar results were reported by (Carlo et al. 2016; Abdel Hameed 2009 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref45">45</xref>]; Gillum and Levetin 2008 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref46">46</xref>]. Airborne spores and cells may be carried by the wind or by human activities or deposited onto the wall surfaces by gravitational settling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref47">47</xref>]. Most microorganisms are able to successfully grow on stone surfaces covered with dust, animal remains, air contaminants and secretion or finger-marks, creating invisible layer of biofilm (Rajendran and Nisy 2012).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Microorganisms from Deteriorated Limestone</title><p>According to data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(a), eight species belonging to six bacterial genera were recovered from samples collected from surfaces of deteriorated limestone of outdoors and indoors of El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret. The genus Bacillus showed maximum frequency, it was represented by two species: B. cereus and B. subtilis comprising (54.5%; 42.9% and 24.2%; 32.1%) of total bacteria recovered from outdoors and indoors, respectively. Additionally, Bacilluscereus OK447647 was recorded all isolated samples. Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Streptomyces, Serratia and Pseudomonas revealed lower counts comprising percentages ranging between (10.6% and 1.2%) of bacterial total counts. Comparable results were reported by Jroundi et al. (2020) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref48">48</xref>], who</p><p>reported that Bacillus was detected in all samples of stones collected from Maya archeological site of Copan, Honduras. On the other hand, Banciu (2013) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref49">49</xref>] stated that Strains of Bacillus spp. are some of most oftenly found bacteria identified on surface as well as inside the stone artifacts. Furthermore, Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, were recovered from pre-historic rock-paints of Kabra-pahad, India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref50">50</xref>].</p><p>Data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(b) depict that twelve species belonging to seven fungal genera were recovered from outdoor limestone of which Aspergillusniger was the most dominant, comprising the highest frequencies (36.7% and 47.3%) of total fungi from outdoors and indoors, respectively. A. niger and A. flavus were also reported from (77.8% and 88.9%) of samples collected from outdoor and indoor limestone, respectively. Lower frequency (6.3%) was comprised by Penicilliumcorylophyllum which was recovered from outdoor samples only of the total count and was recorded from 11.1% of samples. Dematiatiaceous fungi were represented by four genera (Alternaria alternate, Cladosporiumcladosporoids, CurvularialanataandUlocladium charatum) comprising percentages of 1.3% up to 11.5% of the total fungal counts. These results corroborate with that of Biswas (2013) who isolated eighteen fungal species from Kabra-pahad rocks in India among which Aspergillus group were the most dominant. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref51">51</xref>] also illustrated that within the Aspergillus genus, the most abundant species was Aspergillus fumigatus Fresen., representing up to 28% of the outdoor fungi count, while Penicillium purpurogenum Stoll was dominant within its genus, with a maximum representation (48%). Moreover, fungi such as Phialophora sp., Cladosporium tenuissimun, and Aspergillus were isolated from surfaces of stone monuments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref54">54</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Calcium Carbonate-Dissolving G Microorganisms</title><p>Microbial metabolites enable some substances from rocks or minerals such as Si, Al, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ca, K, Na, Ti, to leach out from their salts, especially because of the impact of microorganisms on the dissolving rate of minerals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref55">55</xref>].</p><p>Two bacterial isolates were positively identified as being capable of dissolving calcium carbonate, they belong to the genus Bacillus: B. cereus OK447647 and B. subtilis OK447648 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0). These results come in agreement with Abd-Elkareem and Mohamed (2017), who reported that calcium carbonate-dissolving Bacillus cereus, B. subtilis and B. circulans were recovered from deteriorated limestone of Sultan Hassan Mosque, Cairo-Egypt. On the other hand, Sonntag (2015) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref56">56</xref>] isolated Brevibacterium sp. from Krast caves, this bacterium is reported their calcite dissolution ability. Moreover, three calcite dissolving bacteria (Bacillus megaterium, B. aryabhattai and Brevibacterium) were isolated from calcareous soil samples from Tamil Nadu, India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref57">57</xref>]. Fungal isolates reported in this work were incapable of dissolving calcium carbonate. Morales et al. (2016) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref58">58</xref>] reported that fungal isolates which were capable of solubilizing calcium by means of organic acid release, represented only 26% of fungi isolated from the surface of Mayan buildings at Yucatan, Mexico. Palmer and Hirsch (1991) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119246-ref59">59</xref>] as well, stated that not all fungal species or strains are able to dissolve calcium carbonate.</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Determination of the Minimal Inhibition Concentration (MIC) of (Sodium Azide) against Isolated Microorganisms</title><p>Based on the results shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, sodium azide of concentrations up to 50 ppm were ineffective against all tested bacteria and fungi. At 100 ppm, all tested</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of (sodium azide) against microorganisms recovered from El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Tested microorganisms</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Diameter (mm) of zone of inhibition</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Concentration (ppm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus cereus OK447647</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus subtilis OK447648</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas oryzihabitans OK447649</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serratia marcescens OK447650</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus flavus Link</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. niger Tiegh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. galaucus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Penicillium chrysogenum Thom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. corylophilum Dierc KX</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cladosporium cladosporoids (Frsen) G. A. de Vries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alternaria alternata (Fr) Keissl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>microorganisms were inhibited, the mean diameter of inhibition zone fluctuated between 8 and 15 mm. Therefore, it can be concluded that 100 ppm was the MIC of sodium azide to inhibit all the tested bacteria and fungi. Similar findings were reported by Abdelhafez et al. (2012), who concluded that 100 ppm of sodium azide was the best treatment to stop the growth of all microbial isolates recovered from surfaces of archeological marble located in Cairo, Egypt.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>It is clear from the visual examination of the limestone samples under study that they are exposed to large levels of damage with a high percentage of different salts, as evidenced by the presence of granular disintegration and cracks and the presence of salt crystals of different sizes that can be observed with the naked eye.</p><p>This was confirmed through analyzes, as the work of microscopy, electron microscopy, X-ray fluorescence and X-ray diffraction showed the presence of soluble salts with the presence of aluminum silicate compounds, clay minerals with a high content of calcite as an essential component of the limestone under study, as was confirmed by analyzes X-ray diffraction also observed the presence of fine cracks in the limestone distributed in an unbalanced manner to the grains as a result of the impact of the destructive materials on the calcite. The calcite grains cause further acceleration of the limestone damage processes as a result of the internal disintegration that results from the activity of the salts.</p><p>Microorganisms have a destructive impact on El-Amir Muhammad’s minaret limestone walls. The presence of calcium carbonate dissolving bacterial species such as B. cereus OK447647 and B. subtilis OK447648 causes severe biodeterioration of the walls. Fungal species such as Aspergillus, Penicillium, Cladosporium and Alternariacan cause many aesthetical damages to stone monuments.</p><p>More attention should be paid to salt weathering, soiling, discoloration and changing microflora. The conservation of the heritage monument is a challenging task. To ensure sustainable conservation, treatments have to be safe to the protected object, eco-friendly, derived from a renewable resource and low cost in application.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ahmed, E.A. and Mohamed, R.M. (2022) Bacterial Deterioration in the Limestone Minaret of Prince Muhammad and Suggested Treatment Methods, Akhmim, Egypt. Geomaterials, 12, 37-58. https://doi.org/10.4236/gm.2022.123004</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119246-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grube, J. (1995) Architecture of the Islamic World: Its History and Social Meaning, Thames and Hudson Ltd., London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brand, H. (1999) Islamic Art and Architecture. Thames and Hudson Ltd., London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abouseif, D. (2010) The Minarets of Cairo: Islamic Architecture from Arab Conquest to the End of the Ottoman Period. I. B. Tauris and Co. Ltd., London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bakhoum, D. (2016) Mamluk Minarets in Modern Egypt: Tracing Restoration Decisions and Interventions. Annales Islamologiques, 50, 147-198. https://doi.org/10.4000/anisl.2195</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abousief, D. (1985) The Minarets of Cairo. AUC Press, Cairo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abd El-Aty, Y. (1999) Structural Analysis of Historical Masonry, Islamic Building Using Computer Numerical Modeling Techniques with an Application on Prince Saraghatmash School in Cairo. Master, Conservation Department, Cairo University, Cairo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Corvo, F., Reyes, J., Valdes, C., Villase&amp;#241;or, F., Cuesta, O., Aguilar, D. and Quintana, P. (2010) Influence of Air Pollution and Humidity on Limestone Materials Degradation in Historical Buildings Located in Cities under Tropical Coastal Climates. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 205, 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0081-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Figueiredo, M.L., Monteiro, A., Lopes, M., Ferreira, J. and Borrego, C. (2013) Air Quality Assessment of Estarreja, an Urban Industrialized Area, in a Coastal Region of Portugal. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185, 5847-5860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2989-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grisafe, D. and Boston, A. (1982) Weathering of the Kansas Capitol Building: A Study of Limestone Deterioration. Technology and Conservation, 7, 26-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carlos, A., Masumi, I., Hiroaki, M., Maki, M. and Takahisa, O. (2010) The Effects of Limestone Aggregate on Concrete Properties. Construction and Building Materials, 24, 2363-2368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.05.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rothert, E., et al. (2007) Stone Properties and Weathering Induced by Salt Crystallization of Maltese Globigerina Limestone. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, No. 271, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2007.271.01.19</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benavente, D., de Jongh, M. and Ca&amp;#241;averas, J. (2021) Weathering Processes and Mechanisms Caused by Capillary Waters and Pigeon Droppings on Porous Limestones. Minerals, 11, Article 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11010018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nijland, T. and Van Hees, R. (2009) Salt Decay of Morley Limestone. Heron, 54, 279-289.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mihajlovski, A., Seyer, D., Benamara, H., Bousta, F. and Di Martino, P. (2015) An Overview of Techniques for the Characterization and Quantification of Microbial Colonization on Stone Monuments. Annals of Microbiology, 65, 1243-1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-014-0956-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdelhafez, A., El-Wekeel, F., Ramadan, E. and Abed-Allah, A. (2021) Microbial Deterioration of Archaeological Marble: Identification and Treatment. Annals of Agricultural Science, 57, 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2012.08.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Katsivela, E., Raisi, L. and Lazaridis, M. (2021) Viable Airborne and Deposited Microorganisms inside the Historical Museum of Crete. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 21, Article ID: 200649. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.200649</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sakr, A., Ghaly, M. and Ali, M. (2013) The Relationship between Salts and Growth of Streptomyces Isolated from Mural Paintings in Some Ancient Egyptian Tombs. Conservation Science in Cultural Heritage, 13, 313-330.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Warscheid, T. and Braams, J. (2000) Biodeterioration of Stone: A Review. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 46, 343-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00109-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Di Pippo, F., Bohn A, Congestri, R., De Philippis, R. and Albertano, P. (2009) Capsular Polysaccharides of Cultured Phototrophic Biofilms. Biofouling, 25, 495-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010902914037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dakal, T. and Cameotra, S. (2012) Microbially Induced Deterioration of Architectural Heritages: Routes and Mechanisms Involved. Environmental Sciences Europe, 24, Article No. 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-24-36</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Di Carlo, E., Chisesi, R., Barresi, G., Barbaro, S., Lombardo, G., Rotolo, V., Sebastianelli, M., Travagliato, G. and Palla, F. (2016) Fungi and Bacteria in Indoor Cultural Heritage Environments: Microbial-Related Risks for Artworks and Human Health. Environment and Ecology Research, 4, 257-264. https://doi.org/10.13189/eer.2016.040504</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pasquarella, C., Pitzurra, O. and Savino, A. (2000) The Index of Microbial Air Contamination. Journal of Hospital Infection, 46, 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2000.0820</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krieg, N. and Holt, J. (1984) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Vol. 1, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zimbro, M., Power, D., Miller, S., Wilson, G., Johnson, J.A. and Difco, B. (2009) Manual of Microbiological Culture Media. 2nd Edition, BD Diagnostics Diagnostic Systems, Sparks.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">White, T., Bruns, T., Lee, S. and Taylor, J. (1990) Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In: Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J. and White, T.J., Eds., PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Academic Press, San Diego, 315-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thompson, J., Gibson, T., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. and Higgins, D. (1997) The ClustalX Windows Interface: Flexible Strategies for Multiple Sequence Alignmentaided by Quality Analysis Tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 25, 4876-4882. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.24.4876</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Swofford, D. (2002) PAUP Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Felsenstein, J. (1981) Evolutionary Trees from DNA Sequences: A Maximum Likelihood Approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 17, 368-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01734359</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Posada, D. and Crandall, K. (1998) Modeltest: Testing the Model of DNA Substitution. Bioinformatics, 14, 817-818. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perrière, G. and Gouy, M. (1996) WWW-Query: An On-Line Retrieval System for Biological Sequence Banks. Biochimie, 78, 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9084(96)84768-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raper, K. and Thom, C. (1949) A Manual of the Penicillia. The Williams and Wilkins Company, Baltimore.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gilman, J. (1957) A Manual of Soil Fungi. The Iowa State University Press, Ames. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195708000-00021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Domsch, K., Gams, W. and Anderson, T. (1980) Compendium of Soil Fungi. Vol. 1, Academic Press, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Subrahmanyam, G., Vaghela, R., Bhatt, N. and Archana, G. (2012) Carbonate-Dissolving Bacteria from “Miliolite”, a Bioclastic Limestone, from Gopnath, Gujarat, Western India. Microbes and Environments, 27, 334-337. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME11347</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brantner, A., Peiffer, K. and Grein, E. (1993) Antibacterial Assays of the Pharmacopoeias: Diffusion Tests of Neutral Substances and Evaluation. Journal of Planta Medica, 59, Article No. 675. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-959952</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Smith, B. and Vilus, H. (2006) Rapid, Catastrophic Decay of Building Limestones: Thoughts on Causes, Effects and Consequences. In: De Buergo, F., Gomez-Heras, M. and Vazuezcalvo, C., Eds., Heritage Weathering and Conservation, Taylor &amp; Francis, London, 191-197.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, B., Gomez-Heras, M. and Vales, H. (2010) Underlying Issues on the Selection, Use and Conservation of Building Limestone. The Geological Society of London, London, Special Publications No. 331, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP331.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Irassar, E. (2009) Sulfate Attack on Cementitious Materials Containing Limestone Filler—A Review. Cement and Concrete Research, 39, 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.11.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waked, K. (1992) Structural Design of Mosques. Al-Handasa for Publishing and Distribution, Cairo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Winkler, E. and Boston, M. (1982) Decay of Stone, Monuments and Buildings: The Role of Acid Rain. The Technology Organization Inc., Boston, 32-36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carlo, E., Chisesi, R., Barresi, G., Barbaro, S., Lombardo, G., Rotolo, V., Sebastianelli, M., Travagliato, G. and Palla, F. (2016) Fungi and Bacteria in Indoor Cultural Heritage Environments: Microbial-Related Risks for Artworks and Human Health. Environment and Ecology Research, 4, 257-264. https://doi.org/10.13189/eer.2016.040504</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Awad, A. (2007) Airborne Dust, Bacteria, Actinomycetes and Fungi at a Flourmill. Aerobiologia, 23, 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-007-9049-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Stelzenbach, L. (2002) Introduction to Aerobiology. In: Hurst, C.J., et al., Eds., Manual of Environmental Microbiology, ASM Press, Washington DC, 801-813.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rajendran, R. and Prasad, N. (2012) A Study on the Indoor and Outdoor Microflora Associated with the Biodeterioration of Mural Paintings at Sekharaipuram Vishnutemple, Adakkaputhur, Palakkad, Kerala, India. International Journal of Environmental Sciences and Research, 1, 104-108.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdel Hameed, A., Khoder, M., Yuosra, S., Osman, A. and Ghanem, S. (2009) Diurnal Distribution of Airborne Bacteria and Fungi in the Atmosphere of Helwan Area, Egypt. The Science of the Total Environment, 407, 6217-6222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gillum, S. and Levetin, E. (2008) The Air Spora Close to a Compost Facility in Northeast Oklahoma: Part I: Spore Trap Sampling. Aerobiologia, 24, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-007-9074-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abd-Elkareem, E. and Mohamed, R. (2017) Microbial Deterioration of Limestone of Sultan Hassan Mosque, Cairo-Egypt and Suggested Treatment. International Journal of ChemTech Research, 10, 535-552.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jroundi, F., Elert, K., Ruiz-Agudo, E., Teresa, M., Mu&amp;#241;oz, G. and Rodriguez-Navarro, C. (2020) Bacterial Diversity Evolution in Maya Plaster and Stone Following a Bio-Conservation Treatment. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, Article ID: 599144. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.599144</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Banciu</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>Diversity of Endolithic Prokaryotes Living in Stone Monuments</article-title><source> Studia Ubb Biologia</source><volume> 58</volume>,<fpage> 99</fpage>-<lpage>109</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biswas, J., Sharma, K. and Rajput, Y. (2013) Biodeterioration Agents: Bacterial and Fungal Diversity Dwelling in or on the Pre-Historic Rock-Paints of Kabra-Pahad, India. Iranian Journal of Microbiology, 5, 309-314.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aira, M., Jato, V., Stchigel, A., Rajo, F. and Piontelli, E. (2007) Aeromycological Study in the Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela (Spain). International Biodeterioration &amp; Biodegradation, 60, 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2007.02.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diakumaku, E., Gorbushina, A., Krumbein, W., Panina, L. and Soukharjevski, S. (1995) Black Fungi in Marble and Limestones: An Aesthetical, Chemical and Physical Problem for the Conservation of Monuments. Science of the Total Environment, 167, 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04590-W</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De los Ríos, A., Cámara, B., Del Cura, M., Rico, V., Galván, V. and Ascaso, C. (2009) Deteriorating Effects of Lichen and Microbial Colonization of Carbonate Building Rocks in the Romanesque Churches of Segovia (Spain). Science of the Total Environment, 407, 1123-1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.09.042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, H., Ding, S., Katayama, Y., Kusumi, A., Li, S., De Vries, R., Wang, J., Yu, X. and Gu, J. (2013) Occurrence of Aspergillusallahabadii on Sandstone at Bayon Temple, Angkor Thom, Cambodia. International Biodeterioration &amp; Biodegradation, 76, 112-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.06.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lian, B., Chen, Y., Zhu, L.J. and Yang, R.D. (2008) Effect of Microbial Weathering on Carbonate Rocks. Earth Science Frontiers, 15, 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5791(09)60009-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sonntag, G. (2015) An Analysis of Microbial Involvement in Biospeleogenesis within Lechuguilla Cave System. Honors Research Project, Paper 165, Department of Biology, The University of Akron, Akron.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tamilselvi, S., Thiyagarajan, C. and Uthandi, S. (2016) Calcite Dissolution by Brevibacterium sp. SOTI06: A Futuristic Approach for the Reclamation of Calcareous Sodic Soils. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, Article No. 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01828</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morales, B., Zapata, N., Estebanez, M., Quintana, P., Garcia, S., Bullen, H., Cornelio, S. and Bacab, M. (2016) Bioweathering Potential of Cultivable Fungi Associated with Semi-Arid Surface Microhabitats of Mayan Buildings. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, Article No. 201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00201</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119246-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palmer, R. and Hirsch, P. (1991) Photosynthesis-Based Microbial Communities on Two Churches in Northern Germany: Weathering of Granite and Glazed Brick. Geomicrobiology Journal, 9, 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490459109385992</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>