<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Computational Chemistry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2332-5968</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/cc.2022.103006</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">CC-119189</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Statistical Evaluation of Uncoupling Protein 1 in the Limited Area of Brown Adipose Tissue by Immunoelectron Microscopy
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiaomin</surname><given-names>Dong</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Seiichi</surname><given-names>Chiba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tatsuo</surname><given-names>Shimada</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fumihiko</surname><given-names>Hamada</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Emeritus Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>121</fpage><lpage>137</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) expressed by the brown adipose tissue (BAT) in the mitochondrial crista acts as a homeostatic thermogenerator of eutherians. The evaluation of UCP1 expression in the BAT offers significant scientific insight, especially in studies targeting limited areas such as the periarterial and pericardial regions of small experimental mammals. However, the negligible amount of this adipose tissue would render the general quantitative evaluation of the protein unreliable because of lipid contamination and low protein concentration. To address this problem, we quantitatively evaluated UCP1 expression in the mitochondrion of the mouse interscapular BAT using immunoelectron microscopy and immunohistochemical studies using a combination of primary and secondary antibodies in scheme A (rabbit anti-UCP1 IgG/gold particle-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG), B (rabbit IgG/gold particle-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG), C (rabbit anti-UCP1 IgG/gold particle-unconjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG), and D (rabbit IgG/gold particle-unconjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG). Scheme A shows the immunopositive reaction of obvious gold particles in the mitochondrial area, whereas other procedures revealed less distinctive reactions. The distinctive gold particle immunoreaction comprised electrical high-density spots with a mean diameter of &gt;5 nm. However, in scheme B, the electrical high-density spots were scattered outside the mitochondrion and were significantly smaller than 4 nm; schemes C and D demonstrated few immunoreactions. Logistic regression analysis between schemes A and B showed that the threshold diameter of the electrical high-density spots measuring &gt;5 nm indicated a true positive immunoreaction to anti-UCP1 antibody specifically in the mitochondrial area. Minor statistical difference was observed in the primary anti-UCP1 antibody between polyclonal IgG and monoclonal antibodies. Therefore, immunoelectron microscopy might be useful for evaluating negligible protein expression in some limited areas, such as UCP1 expression in the BAT of small experimental animals.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Uncoupling Protein 1 (UCP1)</kwd><kwd> Brown Adipose</kwd><kwd> Immunoelectron Microscopy</kwd><kwd> Immunohistochemical Staining</kwd><kwd> Logistic Regression Analysis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) is a thermogenic biomolecule expressed in the mitochondrial crista of adipocytes in the brown adipose tissue (BAT) of mammals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref4">4</xref>]. The biological functions of UCP1 include thermogenesis and antioxidative reactions that enable the conversion of free electrons for heat generation. Therefore, evaluation of the expression of UCP1 in the BAT may give an insight into energy homeostasis involving glucose and lipid metabolism, as well as oxidative reactions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref5">5</xref>]. The involvement of periarterial and pericardial BAT in metabolic and arteriosclerotic disorders emphasizes the need to evaluate UCP1 function around the arteries and heart [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref9">9</xref>]. Nevertheless, some difficulties exist in the quantitative evaluation of UCP1 expression in lipid-rich organs such as BAT around relatively restricted areas, such as the periarterial and pericardial regions of small experimental animals such as mice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref11">11</xref>]. A successful approach to this problem was shown by Cinti et al. using an immunoelectron microscope [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref12">12</xref>], and developed by other researchers using gold particles conjugated to secondary antibodies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref17">17</xref>]; however, the numerical characteristics of the immunopositive reactions remain obscure.</p><p>In this study, we quantitatively evaluated the expression of UCP1 in the interscapular BAT of mice by immunohistochemical staining using a gold particle-conjugated secondary antibody and electron microscopy. In addition, we statistically compared the diameters and densities of high-intensity electron signals of gold particles in the mitochondrial area under staining conditions with or without primary or secondary antibodies.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Animals</title><p>Eight male C57Bl/6 mice aged approximately 10 weeks with an initial weight of approximately 22 - 24 g were used in this study. Four mice were housed per cage in a soundproof room under a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle (lights on at 07:00 h) and fed a standard laboratory diet and tap water ad libitum. All procedures were conducted according to the Oita University Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, based on the National Institutes of Health guidelines, and approved by the Animal Care Committee of Oita University (No. 200101).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Chemicals</title><p>Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against UCP1 (ab10983, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, UK) and rabbit monoclonal antibody against UCP1 (EPR20381, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, UK) were used as primary antibodies for immunohistochemical staining. Rabbit polyclonal IgG (ab37415, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, UK) and rabbit monoclonal IgG (EPR25A, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, UK) were used as primary IgG isotype controls to identify false positives in the electron microscopic immunohistochemical staining method. These primary antibodies were labeled by a gold-conjugated (5.4 nm mean diameter) goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (GAR-70802/1, Aurion, Wageningen, NLD) as the secondary antibody in the immunoelectron microscopic analysis. Goat anti-rabbit IgG (G0388, TCI, Tokyo, JP) was used as an isotype control for the secondary antibody.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Apparatus and Software</title><p>Transmission electron microscopy and immunoelectron microscopy were performed using a model H-7650 microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). ImageJ (U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 1997-2017) was used for image analysis, and SAS (JMP Pro 14, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, US) was used for statistical analyses.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Experimental Procedures</title><sec id="s2_4_1"><title>2.4.1. Sample Collection</title><p>All animals were anesthetized at 10:00 h with pentobarbital sodium (150 mg/kg intraperitoneal [i.p.]) and perfused through the left ventricle with ice-cold saline followed by either 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.05 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for light microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, and immunoelectron microscopy or 50% Karnovsky’s fixative solution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref18">18</xref>] for transmission electron microscopy. The hearts and aortae were excised and fixed overnight.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_2"><title>2.4.2. Four Schemes of Immunoelectron Histochemical Staining Regimes</title><p>To confirm the accurate immunoelectron reaction with UCP1 in the BAT, we tested four schemes of immunoelectron histochemical staining. Scheme (A) served as a regular protocol using the primary antibody to UCP1 and the gold-conjugated secondary antibody. The second scheme (B) served as a protocol missing the specific primary antibody, combined with a nonspecific immunoglobulin as a primary antibody and a gold-conjugated secondary antibody. The third scheme (C) served as a protocol missing highlight by the gold standard, combining the primary antibody to UCP1 and a nonspecific immunoglobulin as a secondary antibody. The fourth scheme (D) served as a control protocol, combining a nonspecific immunoglobulin as the primary antibody and a nonspecific immunoglobulin as the secondary antibody. During the treatment with the primary antibody, rabbit polyclonal anti-UCP1 immunoglobulin (IgG) or rabbit monoclonal anti-UCP1 IgG was used. Gold-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG was used as the secondary antibody. For nonspecific rabbit IgG and goat IgG, rabbit polyclonal IgG, rabbit monoclonal IgG, and goat IgG were used.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_3"><title>2.4.3. Immunoelectron Microscopy</title><p>The collected samples were cut into very fine pieces, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.05 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 2 h at 4˚C, and rinsed with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). The specimens were dehydrated in an ascending ethanol wash series and embedded in LR White resin (London Resin Co. Ltd., London, UK). Ultrathin sections were cut using an ultramicrotome and mounted onto copper grids. The samples were rinsed thrice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 3 min, incubated in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS (BSA-PBS; 0.01 M phosphate buffer + 0.15 M sodium chloride [NaCl], pH 7.2) for 30 min at room temperature, and then incubated with rabbit polyclonal (or monoclonal) IgG anti-UCP1 primary antibody (1/10,000) overnight at 4˚C. This was followed by rinsing in BSA-PBS for 30 min at room temperature and incubation with gold-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1/40) for 1 h at room temperature. Samples were then rinsed thrice with PB (0.01 M, pH 7.4) for 30 min at room temperature, followed by rinsing with distilled water for 10 s. Next, the samples were subjected to the physical development treatment as mentioned above. Briefly, the samples were incubated in a mixture of solutions A and B for 28 min at 23˚C and then rinsed four times in distilled water for 5 min. Finally, the samples were dried and stained with distilled water containing 1% methanolic uranyl acetate and 0.08% lead citrate, in the same manner as for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref19">19</xref>]. The same protocol was also applied in schemes (C and D) using nonspecific IgG as primary or secondary antibodies.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Digital Image Analysis of the Outcome of Immunoelectron Microscopy</title><p>The samples used for immunoelectron microscopic analysis were divided into the following four groups: For schemes A and B, polyclonal rabbit IgG as the “primary” anti-UCP1 antibody and gold-conjugated polyclonal goat IgG as the “secondary” anti-rabbit antibody (polyclonal UCP1+/G+), polyclonal IgG for the anti-UCP1 antibody(−) with gold-conjugated polyclonal goat IgG for the anti-rabbit antibody (polyclonal UCP1−/G+). For schemes A and B, monoclonal rabbit IgG for the anti-UCP1 antibody(+) with gold-conjugated polyclonal goat IgG for the anti-rabbit antibody (monoclonal UCP1+/G+), and monoclonal IgG for the anti-UCP1 antibody(−) with gold-conjugated polyclonal goat IgG for the anti-rabbit antibody (monoclonal UCP1−/G+). Negative controls for immunoelectron microscopic analysis were prepared for four additional groups. Schemes C and D in polyclonal IgG treatment, polyclonal rabbit IgG for the anti-UCP1 antibody with polyclonal goat IgG for the anti-rabbit antibody (polyclonal UCP1+/G−), polyclonal rabbit IgG with polyclonal goat IgG for the anti-rabbit antibody (polyclonal UCP1−/G−). Schemes C and D in monoclonal IgG treatment, monoclonal rabbit IgG for the anti-UCP1 antibody with monoclonal goat IgG for the anti-rabbit antibody (polyclonal UCP1+/G−), monoclonal rabbit IgG with the monoclonal goat IgG for the anti-rabbit antibody (polyclonal UCP1−/G−). All the samples mounted on copper grids were observed using electron microscopy. Immunoelectron microscopic reactivity was recorded using 30 images with a magnitude of 1/100,000 for each sample. Each image was evaluated for the following three values: 1) mitochondrial area, 2) diameter of the intensive immunoreactive dots, and 3) count of the intensive immunoreactive dots in the mitochondrial area. The diameter of each intensive immunoreactive dot provided information analogous to a 6 nm diameter gold corpuscle in the secondary antibody. The mitochondrial area and count of the intensive immunoreactive dots around or above 6 nm in diameter identified the density of immunoreactivity to UCP1 in the mitochondrial area of the BAT.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. The Reliability of Immunoreactivity of Primary Anti-UCP1 Antibodies with Gold-Conjugated Secondary Antibody in Mitochondrial Areas</title><p>To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of immunoelectron staining using primary anti-UCP1 polyclonal or monoclonal IgG antibodies, the numerical data of the diameters of the immunoreactive dots were obtained by a logistic regression analysis. This analysis estimated the reliability between the independent variable of the presence or absence of the UCP1 antibody and the dependent variable of the diameter of the immunoreactive dots in the mitochondrial areas.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The results were expressed as mean values with associated standard errors. Normality was confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and continuous variables were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The contribution of independent variables to the properties of dependent variables and the evaluation of suitability between several models were confirmed by a multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values were also calculated using integrated logistic models. Statistical significance was set at P &lt; 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using the SAS software (JMP Pro 14, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, US).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Morphology of the BAT</title><p>In comparison with the white adipose tissue (WAT), the BAT exhibited a multilocular appearance upon staining with hematoxylin and eosin (Supplementary FigureS1). Ultrastructure evaluation revealed the abundance of mitochondria with well-developed cristae in the cytoplasm as one of the distinctive features of BAC (Supplementary FigureS2). Immunohistochemical staining of UCP1 using a polyclonal IgG antibody against UCP1 (polyclonal UCP1 antibody) revealed positive reactions with visible brown staining in the cytoplasm of the BAT (Supplementary FigureS3). Similarly, immunohistochemical staining with polyclonal UCP1 antibody exhibited prominent positive reactions in black (Supplementary FigureS4) or red fluorescence (Supplementary FigureS5). The precise site of UCP1 expression in the cytoplasm was observed by immunoelectron staining using TEM. Positive immunoreaction of polyclonal UCP1 antibody conjugated with gold particles with a mean diameter of 5.4 nm was identified on the inner membrane of the mitochondrial crista of the BAC as compared to that in the WAT and negative controls (Supplementary FigureS6).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Immunoelectron Staining of BAT</title><p>All numerical values were normally distributed according to the Shapiro–Wilk test. We detected two patterns in the immunoelectron reaction, represented by clusters of gold particles. The first pattern was the density of clustered gold particles appearing as immunoelectron-positive reactions in the mitochondrial area. Polyclonal and monoclonal UCP1+/G+ (scheme A) exhibited similar immunoelectron-positive reactions in the inner membrane of the mitochondrial crista of BAC compared to the negative controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The outcomes of the immunoelectrical staining in UCP1+/G− (scheme C) and UCP1−/G− (scheme D) showed no signals of immunoreaction, in which there was no difference between UCP1+/G− or UCP1−/G− and plane electron microscope image, then the images of UCP1+/G− and UCP1−/G− were not demonstrated. Quantitative analyses revealed a significant increase in the density of immunoelectron-positive reactions to polyclonal UCP1+/G+ (scheme A), as well as to monoclonal UCP1+/G+ (scheme A), compared with UCP1−/G+ (scheme B) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). No significant differences were found between polyclonal and monoclonal UCP1+/G+ (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Computerized measurement of the diameter of the clustered gold particles indicated a significant increase in the diameter of polyclonal and monoclonal UCP1+/G+ compared to UCP1−/G+ (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Remarkably, no significant differences were found between polyclonal and monoclonal UCP1+/G+ (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The cutoff values in the logistic regression analysis of the diameter of the clustered gold particles were 5.647 nm (sensitivity, 96.480%; specificity, 96.48%; AUC = 0.997, P &lt; 0.001) when using the polyclonal UCP1 antibody and 5.140 nm (sensitivity 98.810%, specificity 97.34%, and AUC = 0.999, P &lt; 0.001) when using the monoclonal UCP1 antibody (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><p>Overall, the positive reaction of clustered gold particles was more impressive when the monoclonal UCP1 antibody was used, whereas little quantitative significance was found in the density and diameter between the polyclonal and monoclonal UCP1 antibodies.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion and Conclusions</title><p>The BAT exhibited a multilocular appearance with small fat droplets and abundant mitochondria along with UCP 1 expression in the cytoplasm (Supplementary Figures S1-S6). The expression site of UCP1 was confirmed in the inner</p><p>membrane of the mitochondrial crista by immunohistochemical staining and electron microscopy (Figure1 and Figure2 and Supplementary FigureS6(b)). Immunoelectron images of UCP1 revealed the immunoreactive clusters of gold particles immunochemically conjugated to the UCP1 antibody. Next, gold particles were significantly identified using the diameter indicated by the manufacturer in the univariate logistic regression analysis (Figure5). A quantitative comparison of the patterns of the immunoreactive clusters between the polyclonal IgG anti-UCP1 antibody and monoclonal antibody revealed only a few differences in the diameter and density of the particles within the immunoreactive</p><p>clusters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Statistical evidence underlying the immunoreactive clusters was evaluated by calculating the diameter and density of the immunoreactive particles on the mitochondrial inner crista (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Polyclonal and monoclonal IgG anti-UCP1 antibodies appeared to function similarly as carriers of immunoreactive clusters. The monoclonal IgG anti-UCP1 antibody exhibited clearer immunoreactive clusters, although they were not significantly different from those exhibited by the polyclonal antibody.</p><p>The immunoelectron microscopy method was previously established [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref12">12</xref>]. The immunoreactive clusters of gold particles conjugated to the polyclonal IgG</p><p>anti-UCP1 antibody observed in the mitochondria clearly indicated the site of UCP1 expression in the mitochondria of rats where the protein expression was upregulated upon exposure to cold. Previous studies have quantitatively analyzed immunoreactive clusters of gold particles using immunoelectron microscopy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref17">17</xref>]. The accuracy of the diagnostic evaluation using the diameters of immunoreactive gold particles in the logistic regression analysis revealed the significant effective scores for sensitivity and specificity as compared with those of UCP1 antibody and the negative control. The obtained diameter of the immunopositive particles appeared to reflect the manufacturer’s data sheet for the diameter of the gold particles. Therefore, we established that verification of the diameters of immunoreactive gold particles could indicate the reliability of the method. Although a few reports have compared the immunohistochemical responses of UCP1 antibody in the BAT between monoclonal and polyclonal IgGs using electron microscopy, our study demonstrated the statistical efficacy of the anti-UCP1 antibody of both polyclonal and monoclonal IgGs using the diameters and densities of the immunoreactive gold particles in the immunoelectron staining of the mouse BAT.</p><p>Although our study has a limitation owing to the lack of a stimulus reaction test such as cold exposure or catecholamine beta-3 receptor agonist treatment where UCP1 might be induced on the inner membrane of the mitochondrial crista of the BAT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref21">21</xref>], we demonstrated a significant threshold such as the mean diameter of the gold particle product between immunopositive reactions and nonspecific staining in immunoelectron microscopy. In the future, we intend to clarify the induction of UCP1 expression in the inner membrane of the mitochondrial crista of the BAT in mammals in response to changes in physiological or pathophysiological conditions using immunohistochemical staining and electron microscopy.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Shuji Tatsukawa, Aiko Yasuda, and Hiroaki Kawazato for advice on electron microscopy, Yukari Gotoh for advice on light microscopy, and Keisuke Ina and Yoshihisa Fujikura for advice on the organization of this study. We would also like to thank the reviewers of this paper for their detailed feedback.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Dong, X.M., Chiba, S., Shimada, T. and Hamada, F. (2022) A Statistical Evaluation of Uncoupling Protein 1 in the Limited Area of Brown Adipose Tissue by Immunoelectron Microscopy. Computational Chemistry, 10, 121-137. https://doi.org/10.4236/cc.2022.103006</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Supplementary Data</title>Material and MethodsChemicals<p>For secondary antibodies in the light microscopic analysis, a peroxidase affinipure goat anti-rabbit IgG (111-035-144, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) in combination with an EnVision System (anti-rabbit IgG-HRP conjugated, Dako Inc., Copenhagen, Denmark) and a Texas Red-affinipure goat anti-rabbit IgG (111-075-045, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) in combination with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride solution (DAPI) (28718-90-3, Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) were used for immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining in the light microscopic observations, respectively. For the development of the physical method (physical development), AgNO<sub>3</sub> (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan), crown ether/dibenzo-18-crown-6 ether (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and hydroquinone (Wako PureChemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) were used. Next, a solution of distilled water 0.1% Kernechtrot (Chroma-Gesellschaft Schmid GmbH &amp; Co, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany) and 5% aluminum sulfate (Wako PureChemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) were used for nuclear staining in the physical development. Then, hematoxylin (Hx61057849, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, DE) and eosin (E6003, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used for general staining, and 150 mg/kg pentobarbital (Somnopentyl, Kyoritsu Seiyaku Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was applied for deep anesthesia before sample collection.</p>Apparatus and Software<p>Fluorescence microscopy (blue in 461 nm, red in 610 nm) examinations were conducted using Eclipse 50i (Nikon Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and BX60 (Olympus Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), respectively.</p>Immunohistochemical Staining<p>Samples that were fixed overnight were dehydrated with ethyl alcohol before embedding in paraffin. Next, coronal serial sections were cut with a thickness of 10 &#181;m and fixed onto MAS-coated glass slides (Matsunami Glass Ind. Ltd., Osaka, Japan). Sections were deparaffinized in xylene, immersed in methanol with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> for 30 min at 4˚C, and then hydratedin a series of descending ethanol concentrations before rinsing in running tap water for 5 min. Subsequently, the sections were incubated in 1% BSA in PBS (BSA–PBS; 0.01 M phosphate buffer + 0.15M NaCl, pH 7.2) for 30 min at room temperature (RT) and then incubated with rabbit polyclonal IgG anti-UCP1 primary antibody (1/1000) overnight at 4˚C. Serial sections were rinsed in BSA-PBS for 30 min at RT and incubated in a peroxidase affinipure goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1/2000) for 1 h at RT before subjecting them to the EnVision System (for 2 h) and DAB visualization (for 10 min) at RT to detect UCP1 immunoreactivity (UCPi). Then, all sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. The specificity of UCP1 antibody was confirmed by performing the same procedure with rabbit polyclonal IgG (1/2000) instead of the primary rabbit polyclonal antibody to UCP1.</p>Physical Development in Immunogold Silver Staining<p>The physicalPhysical development is a method for intensifying the immunohistochemical reaction product [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref1">1</xref>]. The prepared coronal serial sections incubated with the rabbit polyclonal IgG anti-UCP1 primary antibody (1/1000) and rinsed in BSA-PBS similar to immunohistochemical staining were subsequently subjected to immunogold silver staining treatment. The serial sections were incubated in the 6-nm gold-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1/40) for 1 h at RT, rinsed in 0.01 M PB (pH 7.4) four times for 30 min, and washed with distilled water for 10 s. Next, the physical developer was prepared by mixing distilled water with 10% AgNO<sub>3</sub> and 1.1 mM crown ether (solution A) and 0.2 M citric acid buffer (pH 3.45) with 30 mM hydroquinone (solution B). The immediately prepared physical developer was applied to the serial sections for 28 min at 23˚C. After rinsing in running tap water, the serial sections were counterstained with 0.1% Kernechtrot in 5% aqueous aluminum sulfate, rinsed in running tap water, and dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series (more details can be found in our previous report) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref22">22</xref>].</p>Fluorescence Microscopy<p>The dehydrated sample sections were incubated in 1% BSA in PBS (BSA–PBS; 0.01 M phosphate buffer + 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.2) for 30 min at RT and then incubated with rabbit polyclonal IgG anti-UCP1 (1/1000) overnight at 4˚C. Then, the serial sections were rinsed in BSA–PBS for 30 min at RT before incubation with Texas Red-affinipure goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1/2000) for 1 h at RT in darkness. Then, the sections were rinsed in BSA-PBS for 30 min at RT, after which 1 &#181;g/mL of DAPI was applied.</p>Transmission Electron Microscopy<p>The collected samples were cut into very fine pieces, fixed in 50% Karnovsky’s fixative [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref23">23</xref>] for 10 min at 4˚C, rinsed with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4), and post-fixed in 2% OsO<sub>4</sub> (0.1 M cacodylate buffer with 1% potassium ferrocyanide) for 2 h at 4˚C. The specimens were dehydrated in an ascending ethanol wash series and embedded in epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections were cut using an ultramicrotome, mounted on copper grids, and stained with methanolic uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Ultrathin sections were evaluated by Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119189-ref24">24</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Supplementary Results</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119189-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ina, K., Kitamura, H., Tatsukawa, S. and Fujikura, Y. (2011) Significance of Alpha-SMA in Myofibroblasts Emerging in Renal Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis. Histology &amp; Histopathology, 26, 855-866.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karnovsky, M.J. (1961) Simple Methods for “Staining with Lead” at High pH in Electron Microscopy. The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology, 11, 729-732. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.11.3.729</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nagai, K., Noguchi, T., Fujiwara, S., Kawahara, K. and Shimada, T. (2005) Distribution of Langerhans Cells in the Human Esophagus, as Revealed by Immunohistochemistry. Acta Histochemica et Cytochemica, 38, 115-119. https://doi.org/10.1267/ahc.38.115</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Golic, I., Kalezic, A., Jankovic, A., Jonic, S., Korac, B. and Korac, A. (2020) Insulin Modulates the Bioenergetic and Thermogenic Capacity of Rat Brown Adipocytes in Vivo by Modulating Mitochondrial Mosaicism. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, Article 9204. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239204</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reynes, B., Garcia-Ruiz, E., Oliver, P. and Palou, A. (2015) Gene Expression of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Is Affected by Cold Exposure. The American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 309, R824-S834. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00221.2015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nagai, K., Noguchi, T., Fujiwara, S., Kawahara, K. and Shimada, T. (2005) Distribution of Langerhans Cells in the Human Esophagus, as Revealed by Immunohistochemistry. Acta Histochemica et Cytochemica, 38, 115-119. https://doi.org/10.1267/ahc.38.115</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karnovsky, M.J. (1961) Simple Methods for “Staining with Lead” at High pH in Electron Microscopy. The Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology, 11, 729-732. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.11.3.729</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, M., Tanaka, O., Sekiguchi, M., He, H.J., Yasuoka, Y., Itoh, H., Kawahara, K. and Abe, H. (2005) ATP-Sensitive K+-Channel Subunits on the Mitochondria and Endoplasmic Reticulum of Rat Cardiomyocytes. Journal of Histochemistry &amp; Cytochemistry, 53, 1491-1500. https://doi.org/10.1369/jhc.5A6736.2005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, F., Yang, L., Teng, L., Zhang, H. and Katayama, I. (2021) Morphological Alterations and Increased S100B Expression in Epidermal Langerhans Cells Detected in Skin from Patients with Progressive Vitiligo. Life (Basel), 11, Article 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11060579</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martin-Belmonte, A., Aguado, C., Alfaro-Ruiz, R., Albasanz, J. L., Martin, M., Moreno-Martinez, A.E., Fukazawa, Y. and Lujan, R. (2021) The Density of Group I mGlu5 Receptors Is Reduced along the Neuronal Surface of Hippocampal Cells in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22, Article 5867. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115867</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alfaro-Ruiz, R., Aguado, C., Martin-Belmonte, A., Moreno-Martinez, A.E. and Lujan, R. (2020) Cellular and Subcellular Localisation of Kv4-Associated KChIP Proteins in the Rat Cerebellum. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, Article 6403. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21176403</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cilingir-Kaya, O.T., Moore, C., Meshul, C.K., Gursoy, D., Onat, F. and Sirvanci, S. (2021) Neurogenesis Is Enhanced in Young Rats with Genetic Absence Epilepsy: An Immuno-Electron Microscopic Study. Turkish Neurosurgery, 31, 623-633. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.31996-20.2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cinti, S., Cancello, R., Zingaretti, M.C., Ceresi, E., De Matteis, R., Giordano, A., Himms-Hagen, J. and Ricquier, D. (2002) CL316,243 and Cold Stress Induce Heterogeneous Expression of UCP1 mRNA and Protein in Rodent Brown Adipocytes. Journal of Histochemistry &amp; Cytochemistry, 50, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/002215540205000103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diaz Marin, R., Crespo-Garcia, S., Wilson, A.M. and Sapieha, P. (2019) RELi Protocol: Optimization for Protein Extraction from White, Brown and Beige Adipose Tissues. MethodsX, 6, 918-928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.04.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">An, Y.A. and Scherer, P.E. (2020) Mouse Adipose Tissue Protein Extraction. Bio-Protocol, 10, e3631. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.3631</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kortelainen, M.L., Pelletier, G., Ricquier, D. and Bukowiecki, L.J. (1993) Immunohistochemical Detection of Human Brown Adipose Tissue Uncoupling Protein in an Autopsy Series. Journal of Histochemistry &amp; Cytochemistry, 41, 759-764. https://doi.org/10.1177/41.5.8468458</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moreno-Santos, I., Macias-Gonzalez, M., Porras-Martin, C., Castellano-Castillo, D., Sanchez-Espin, G., Gomez-Doblas, J.J., de Teresa-Galvan, E. and Jimenez-Navarro, M. (2019) Role of Epicardial Adipose Tissue NPR-C in Acute Coronary Syndrome. Atherosclerosis, 286, 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.05.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hou, D., Fu, H., Zheng, Y., Lu, D., Ma, Y., Yin, Y., Zhang, L. and Bao, D. (2022) Uncoupling Protein 1 Knockout Aggravates Isoproterenol-Induced Acute Myocardial Ischemia via AMPK/mTOR/PPARalpha Pathways in Rats. Transgenic Research, 31, 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-021-00289-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pinckard, K.M. and Stanford, K.I. (2022) The Heartwarming Effect of Brown Adipose Tissue. Molecular Pharmacology, 102, 460-471. https://doi.org/10.1124/molpharm.121.000328</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chouchani, E.T., Kazak, L., Jedrychowski, M.P., Lu, G.Z., Erickson, B.K., Szpyt, J., Pierce, K.A., Laznik-Bogoslavski, D., Vetrivelan, R., Clish, C.B., Robinson, A.J., Gygi, S.P. and Spiegelman, B.M. (2016) Mitochondrial ROS Regulate Thermogenic Energy Expenditure and Sulfenylation of UCP1. Nature, 532, 112-116. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17399</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wei, H., Chiba, S., Moriwaki, C., Kitamura, H., Ina, K., Aosa, T., Tomonari, K., Gotoh, K., Masaki, T., Katsuragi, I., Noguchi, H., Kakuma, T., Hamaguchi, K., Shimada, T., Fujikura, Y. and Shibata, H. (2015) A Clinical Approach to Brown Adipose Tissue in the Para-Aortic Area of the Human Thorax. PLOS ONE, 10, e0122594. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122594</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ruan, H.B. (2020) Developmental and Functional Heterogeneity of Thermogenic Adipose Tissue. Journal of Molecular Cell Biology, 12, 775-784. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjaa029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Acin-Perez, R., Petcherski, A., Veliova, M., Benador, I.Y., Assali, E.A., Colleluori, G., Cinti, S., Brownstein, A.J., Baghdasarian, S., Livhits, M.J., Yeh, M.W., Krishnan, K.C., Vergnes, L., Winn, N.C., Padilla, J., Liesa, M., Sacks, H.S. and Shirihai, O.S. (2021) Recruitment and Remodeling of Peridroplet Mitochondria in Human Adipose Tissue. Redox Biology, 46, Article ID: 102087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2021.102087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119189-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shinde, A.B., Song, A. and Wang, Q.A. (2021) Brown Adipose Tissue Heterogeneity, Energy Metabolism, and Beyond. Frontiers in Endocrinology (Lausanne), 12, Article ID: 651763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.651763</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>