<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ENG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1947-3931</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/eng.2022.148026</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ENG-119152</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Statically Analysis of the Stress State of Saw Gins Consisting of 90, 100, 110, 120, 130 Saws
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Azizov</surname><given-names>Shuhrat Mamatovich</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Uzoqov</surname><given-names>Farxodjon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shermuhammad</surname><given-names>Alijonov</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hasanov</surname><given-names>Ahmadjon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mirzakarimov</surname><given-names>Mirsharofiddin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department Technological Machines and Equipment’s of Namangan Institute of Engineering and Technology 1, Namangan, Uzbekistan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>329</fpage><lpage>338</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>16,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>15,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In the primary processing of cotton, it is important to increase the productivity of ginning and reduce the wear of working bodies. The working body of 
  the genie is the working chamber, the saw cylinder and the rib grate. The main wear is on the saw cylinder shaft and saw teeth. The wear of these parts leads to additional material costs, as well as to a decrease in the quality of the fiber. The wear of the shaft 
  is 
  affected by the number of saws and the mass of raw cotton in the working chamber of the gin. To prevent wear of the saw cylinder, the article determines the optimal static load on the shaft by calculating saw gins consisting of 90,
   
  100,
   
  110,
   
  120,
   
  130 saws. An analysis of tables shows that maximum value to bending shows 120 and 130 saws cylinder, because shaft bending angles along the length appear. This leads to a 2%
   
  -
   
  3% reduction in the distance between the saws, serves for the premature wear of the saw, the exit of short fibers.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Raw</kwd><kwd> Cotton</kwd><kwd> Shaft</kwd><kwd> Statically</kwd><kwd> Analysis</kwd><kwd> Saw</kwd><kwd> Gin</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Many primary cotton processing enterprises are faced with the problem of obtaining high-quality fiber with less trash and Comparison of fiber properties processed in different cotton processing plants, with different models of fiber separators. Cotton fiber was obtained as a result of ginning with such factory gins 4DP-130.5 DP-130, 3HDD and Lummus gins. The fiber properties of all samples were measured with the Advanced HVI Fiber Information System, to determine the yield of short fibers and UHML. The study is to determine which model of sawing gin produces more short fibers.</p><p>Also many studies were carried out to determine the static and dynamic loads on the saw cylinder shaft with gins 4DP-130 and 5DP-130. Nevertheless, do not have statically analysis of the stress state of saw gins consisting of 90, 100, 110, 120, 130 saws. But, this is research necessary to reduce shaft deflection and increase productivity.</p><p>Start our research by weighing the parts of the saw cylinder. Determining the own weight of the shaft, taking into account the number of saws and saw gasket for one saw cylinder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>The Saw cylinder shaft material steel, steel density— ρ s t e e l = 7800   kg / m 3 .</p><p>Saw cylinder shaft diameter— d a x i s = 0.06 ( m ) .</p><p>The weight of one saw is G s a w = 0.5 ( kg ) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>Gasket weight G p = 0.3 ( kg ) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>Distance between saws—Δ.</p><p>Mainly depends on the number of saws.</p><p>The length of the saw cylinder determined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref3">3</xref>] by the formula:</p><p>l = n ⋅ Δ + 2 ⋅ Δ ;   ( m ) (1)</p><p>The volume of the saw cylinder determined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref4">4</xref>] by the formula:</p><p>V = S ⋅ l = π ⋅ d a x i s 2 4 ⋅ l ;   ( m 3 ) (2)</p><p>The weight of the saw cylinder determined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref7">7</xref>] by the formula:</p><p>G a x i s = ρ s t e e l ⋅ V ;   ( kg ) (3)</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The total weight of the saws of the saw cylinder determined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref8">8</xref>] by the formula</p><p>G Σ s a w = n ⋅ G s a w ;   ( kg ) (4)</p><p>The total weight between the saw gaskets determined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref9">9</xref>] by the formula</p><p>G Σ p = n ⋅ G p ;   ( kg ) (5)</p><p>The total weight of the saw cylinder determined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref10">10</xref>] by the formula</p><p>G Σ = G a x i s + G s a w + G p ;   ( kg ) (6)</p><p>In the calculations, the own weight of the shaft and saw is determined depending on the number of saws and saw blades, as well as the length of the shaft showed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>Determination of the weight of raw cotton in the working chamber of the saw cylinder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>When determining the action of raw cotton pressure on the saw cylinder, the following assumptions made:</p><p>&#183; The force of cotton pressure along the length of the shaft is constant;</p><p>&#183; The coefficient of friction between the teeth of the saw and the cotton also assumed contact.</p><p>In work the pressure of the raw roller on the saw cylinder was studied and the total values of the pressure of raw cotton on the section AB of the saw showed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> depending on the angle of inclination of the grate—φ are given. In this work, we will use the results and consider the value P = 82 Newton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>{ P n 0 = P ⋅ cos φ P τ 0 = P ⋅ sin φ F t 0 = f ⋅ P n = f ⋅ P ⋅ cos φ (7)</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Weight of the shaft depending on the number of saw blades</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >№</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Δl [m]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >L [m]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >V [m<sup>3</sup>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >G<sub>axis </sub> [kg]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >G<sub>Σsaw</sub> + G<sub>Σp</sub><sub> </sub> [kg]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >G<sub>Σ</sub><sub> </sub> [kg]</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.656</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00468</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.734</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0049</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.792</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.952</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0055</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0060</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.684</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0076</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.904</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0082</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139.41</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>AB—rib grate;</p><p>M—Point of application of the resulting cotton pressure;</p><p>P<sub>n</sub>—is the projection of P onto the normal;</p><p>P<sub>τ</sub>—projection of P onto the tangent;</p><p>φ—the angle of inclination of the grate to the horizontal;</p><p>F<sub>t</sub>—is the friction force of the cotton on the saw cylinder;</p><p>f—is the coefficient of dry friction.</p><p>The pressure of raw cotton on the saw cylinder along the length of the shaft, depending on the number of saws—n.</p><p>{ P n = P n 0 ⋅ n P τ = P τ 0 ⋅ n F t = F t 0 ⋅ n (8)</p><p>Values formula 8 a given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>In the plane of the cross sections of the shaft, the pressures of raw cotton a calculated according to the norms and in the tangential direction, depending on the amount of saw [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref13">13</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The pressures of raw cotton on the saw cylinder along the length of the shaft a given, depending on the number of saws—n</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >№</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>max</sub><sub> </sub> [N]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>n</sub> [N]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>τ</sub> [N]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F<sub>t </sub> [N]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >φ [grad]</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45˚<sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45˚</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45˚</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45˚</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45˚</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>With simultaneous deformation by bending with torsion, the internal force in the cross section of the shaft leads to five components:</p><p>1) Torque M<sub>X</sub> = M<sub>K</sub>—relative to the geometric axis—X.</p><p>2) Bending moment M<sub>Y</sub>—relative to the main central axes of inertia of the sections—JY.</p><p>3) M<sub>Z</sub>—relative to the main central axes of inertia of the sections—JZ.</p><p>4) Shear forces Q<sub>Y</sub> relative to the geometric axis—Y.</p><p>5) Shear forces Q<sub>Z</sub> about the geometric axis—Z.</p><p>Since the shaft has, a circular cross section with a diameter d<sub>0</sub>, the shear stresses determined by the forces Q<sub>Y</sub> and Q<sub>Z</sub> are of secondary importance and can ignored in the calculations.</p><p>In this case, the shaft works on a complex resistance. In the YZ plane, torsion occurs; in the XY and XZ planes, the shaft bends. Their values a given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. The values formula (9), (10) of the bending moments of inertia with different numbers of saws and between of saw distance showed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>M k r = P ⋅ D ⋅ sin φ 2 + F t r ⋅ D 2 ; (9)</p><p>{ M y = q y ⋅ l 2 ⋅ x − q y ⋅ x 2 2 ; M z = q z ⋅ l 2 ⋅ x − q z ⋅ x 2 2 ; (10)</p><p>q y = q o y + q c v y + q t r y ⋅ q z = q t r z ; (11)</p><p>q<sub>oy</sub>—Intensity of pressure of the own weight of the shaft, taking into account saws and saw spacers along the Y axis;</p><p>q<sub>cvy</sub>—Intensity of raw roller pressure along the Y axis;</p><p>q<sub>try</sub>—The intensity of the friction force of the raw roller along the axis—Y;</p><p>q<sub>trz</sub>—The intensity of the friction force of the raw roller along the axis—Z;</p><p>Values formula 11 a given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>According to the model of static calculation of the saw cylinder showed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, internal force factors are determined: torque—M<sub>kr</sub>.</p><p>Bending moments M<sub>z</sub>, M<sub>y</sub>—respectively, relative to the main axes of inertia of the sections iY, iZ.</p><p>In the case under consideration, the shaft works for complex resistance, that is, in the YZ plane—for torsion in the XZ plane and XY for bending.</p><p>In the YZ plane, torsion occurs; the shaft bends in the XY and XZ planes showed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>Plots of twisting and bending moments from the pressure of raw cotton and from the pressure of the own weight of the shaft of saws and inter saw spacers are constructed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119152-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>From graphics M k r max , M z max , M y max —it can be seen that the dangerous section of the shaft will be the section in the middle along the length of the shaft. The maximum normal bending stresses and shear stresses are determined based</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The pressure intensity of the saw cylinder, raw roller is given, taking into account the friction force relative to the Y and Z axes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >№</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Δl (m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >q (N/m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >q<sub>n</sub> (N/m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >q<sub>t</sub><sub>-y </sub> (N/m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >q<sub>y </sub> (N/m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >q<sub>z</sub> (N/m)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >548.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2<sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >555</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >566.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >576</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >586.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >577</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >623.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >479</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >513</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >578</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >622.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >480</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >511</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Shows the values of the bending moments of inertia with different numbers of saws and between of saw distance</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >№</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Δl (m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >M k r max (N∙m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >M y max (N∙m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >M z max (N∙m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >M e k v max (N∙m)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >187.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >187.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >461.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >462.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >346.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.47 /</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >346.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >538.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >538.81</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>on the maximum values of the moments according to the formula:</p><p>σ max = M e k v W τ max = M k r W (12)</p><p>W—static section modulus of the shaft</p><p>W = 0.1 ⋅ d 0 3 = 21.6 &#215; 10 − 6     m 3</p><p>The shear stress, which determines the torque, reaches the highest value at all points of the section contour, and the largest normal stresses, which determine the moments M<sub>y</sub> and M<sub>z</sub>, are obtained at the points of the edge of the section contour lying at the ends of the diameter perpendicular to the vector of the resulting bending moment, showed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>According to the third hypothesis of strength, we determine the calculated stress values σ<sub>p</sub> by the formula</p><p>σ p = σ max 2 + 4 τ max 2 (13)</p><p>According to the diagrams of torque and bending moments, the maximum values of normal stresses and tangential stresses a found. Their values, depending on the number of saws, a given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. Increasing the angle of the shaft and increasing the deflection of the shaft leads to vibration of the shaft which reduces the performance of the fiber showed <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p><p>All calculations will be similar to those for a single cylinder gin. The solution results formula (14) and (15) are deflection and angle of inclination of the shaft shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>.</p><p>Angle of inclination of the shaft we find by (14) formula</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> The values of all voltages are given depending on the number of saws in the saw cylinder</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >№</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >τ max ⋅ 10 5 [N/m<sup>2</sup>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >σ max ⋅ 10 5 [N/m<sup>2</sup>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >σ p ⋅ 10 5 [N/m<sup>2</sup>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Δl [N/m]</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Deflection and angle of inclination of the shaft</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >№</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >f<sub>max</sub> [m]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >θ<sub>max</sub> [rad]</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00033<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 * 10<sup>−4/2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00040<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11 * 10<sup>−4/2 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00045<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13 * 10<sup>−4/2 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00064 *<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16 * 10<sup>−4/2 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00085<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21 * 10<sup>−4/2 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002.04<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40 * 10<sup>−2 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00239<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 * 10<sup>−2 </sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>θ = q ⋅ l 2 24 E I x ; (14)</p><p>The deflection of inclination of the shaft we find by (15) formula</p><p>f = 5 q l 4 384 E I x ; (15)</p><p>The results of the calculation of a single-chamber two-cylinder gin for a stress-strain state are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>. Where the self-weight of the shaft, saw and saw blades is determined.</p><p>An analysis of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> shows that due to bending, shaft bending angles along the length appear. This leads to a 2% - 3% reduction in the distance between the saws, serves for the premature wear of the saw, the exit of short fibers.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Conclusions</title><p>The calculations determined the own weight of the shaft and saw, depending on the number of saws and saw blades, as well as the length of the shaft. The heaviest was the saw cylinder with 130 saw blades.</p><p>In the plane of the cross sections of the shaft, the pressures of raw cotton were calculated according to the norms and along the tangential direction, depending on the amount of saw.</p><p>According to the model of static calculation of the saw cylinder internal force factors were determined: torque—M<sub>kr</sub>, Bending moments M<sub>z</sub>, M<sub>y</sub>—respectively, relative to the main axes of inertia of the sections JY, JZ; in the case under consideration, the shaft works for complex resistance, that is, in the YZ plane—for torsion in the XZ plane and XY for bending.</p><p>Plots of twisting and bending moments from the pressure of raw cotton and from the pressure of the own weight of the shaft of saws and between saw spacers are constructed. According to the diagrams of torque and bending moments, the maximum values of normal stresses and tangential stresses a found. It has been established that with an increase in the number of saws, the maximum value of normal stresses increases. As in classical calculations, the dangerous section of the shaft is the middle of the shaft along the length; raw cotton pressure on the shaft; maximum, the value of torque and bending moments for dangerous sections of the shaft. A comparison was made of the values of the moments depending on the width of the saw blades. The values of tangential and normal stress an obtained depending on the number of saws and the distance between the saws. An analysis of tables shows that maximum value to bending shows 120 and 130 saws cylinder, because shaft bending angles along the length appear, reduced fiber removal from saw teeth, also this bending leads to a 2% - 3% reduction in the distance between the saws, serves for the premature wear of the saw, the exit of short fibers. It is necessary to reduce the number of saws to 90 - 80 pieces and reduce the weight of the shaft to increase the effective removal of fiber from the saw teeth.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mamatovich, A.S., Farxodjon, U., Alijonov, S., Ahmadjon, H. and Mirsharofiddin, M. (2022) Statically Analysis of the Stress State of Saw Gins Consisting of 90, 100, 110, 120, 130 Saws. Engineering, 14, 329-338. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2022.148026</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119152-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hughs, S.E., Holt, G.A., Armijo, C.B., Whitelock, D.P. and Valco, T.D. (2020) Development of the Cotton Gin. The Journal of Cotton Science, 24, 34-43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119152-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mamatovich, A.S. (2016) Analysis of the Influence of Geometric Characteristics of the Saw and the Gasket of Saw Gin on the Life of Saw at Different Distances between the Saw. Journal of Textile Science and Engineering, 6, 256. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-8064.1000256</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119152-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Armijo, C.B., et al. (2019) How Current Cotton Ginning Practices Affect Fiber Length Uniformity Index. The Journal of Cotton Science, 23, 66-77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119152-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azizov, S.M. and Axmedhodjaev, X.T. (2016) The Optimal Modeling of an Angular Position of Saw Cylinders in Single-Chamber Two Cylinders Gin. American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 1, 103-106.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119152-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Y.D., Zhang, L.F., Yang, W., et al. (2022) Effect of Nozzle Type on Fluid Flow, Solidification, and Solute Transport in Mold with Mold Electromagnetic Stirring. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 29, 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-021-00577-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119152-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azizov, S.M. and Axmedhodjaev, X.T. (2015) Theoretical Analysis of Gin Cylinder for Simulating Dual Saw Cylinder Chamber Gin for Increasing Wear Proof, Energy Efficient, Saving Resources. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3, 91-99. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2015.33010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119152-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azizov, S., Ibrohimov, M., Uzoqov, F. and Mirzakarimov, M. (2021) The Modelling and Introductions of New Type Ribs of Lattice of the Two Cylinder of Gin. E3S Web of Conferences, 273, Article No. 07020. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127307020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119152-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hughs, E., Holt, G., Rutherford, R. and Hughs, E. (2017) Saw Gin Stands. The Journal of Cotton Science, 21, 60-69.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119152-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baydar, G., Ciliz, N. and Mammadov, A. (2015) Life Cycle Assessment of Cotton Textile Products in Turkey. Resources, Conservation &amp; Recycling, 104, 213-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119152-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mamatovich, A.S. and Abdusamat, K. (2011) Definition of Increasing the Fibre Capturing Surface of Saw Teeth of Cotton Ginning Machine through Mathematic Modelling. World Journal of Mechanics, 1, 122-126. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjm.2011.13017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119152-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Whitelock, D., et al. (2019) Cotton Gin Pneumatic Conveying Systems. The Journal of Cotton Science, 23, 182-217.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119152-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azizov, S., Uzoqov, F., Mirzakarimov, M. and Usmanov, O. (2021) Analysis of Namangan 77 Cotton in Production Line with Different Saw Gins for Short Fiber Yield. E3S Web of Conferences, 273, Article No. 07021. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127307021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119152-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mamatovich, A.S. (2022) Calculation Energy of Efficiency New Ginning Machine. Engineering, 14, 163-172. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2022.144016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119152-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mamatovich, A.S., Abdusamat, K. and Arras, P. (2013) The Mathematical Simulation of Brush Drums in a Dual Saw Cylinder Chamber Gin for the Purpose of Increasing the Quantity of Captured Cotton Fiber from Saw. World Journal of Mechanics, 3, 58-61. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjm.2013.31004</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>