<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1109061</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-119025</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Information and Communication Technology Literacy in Medical Studies in Fez Morocco
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nada</surname><given-names>Otmani</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Noura</surname><given-names>Qarmiche</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hind</surname><given-names>Bourkhime</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammed</surname><given-names>Omari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Imad</surname><given-names>Chakri</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moncef</surname><given-names>Maiouak</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ibtissam</surname><given-names>El Harch</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Soumaya</surname><given-names>Ben Maamar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bineta</surname><given-names>Jho Diagne</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nassiba</surname><given-names>Bahra</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nabil</surname><given-names>Tachfouti</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samira</surname><given-names>El Fakir</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Laboratory of Epidemiology, Clinical Research and Community Health, FMPDF, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratory Artificial Intelligence, Data Science and Emerging Systems, NSA, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Biostatistic-Informatics Unit. Laboratory of Epidemiology, Clinical Research and Community Health, FMPDF, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>08</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>29,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>1,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>4,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: Our objective is to evaluate the level of knowledge and competencies in the use of ICT tools and the need for training in medical staff in the faculty of medicine and pharmacy of Fez. 
  Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey from May 2021, in the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Fez in various doctor’s classes: professors, medical residents, interns, and students. The questionnaire was mainly organized into two sections about the level of 1) knowledge and competencies in the use of ICT tools and 2) the perception of importance and the need for training in these tools. Each section was made of 20 questions about the main ICT tools used in medical education Chi2 test was used to test associations between the competency of the use of ICT’s tools and the participant’s medical classes, the student’s study level and gender of the participant. The statistical analysis was carried out by the data analysis SPSS V26. 
  Results: The majority of participants had access to computers and to the internet. Most of the participants were familiar with the use of word processing, presentation software, mailing and file management. Nevertheless, most respondents reported low competency levels in database software, data management, programming and the creation of web pages. The need for training was different according to the participant’s profile. 
  Conclusion: Participants revealed that the use of ICT is a potentially important tool for their education and research. However, more integration of information literacy and ICT training in medical curricula is needed to enhance the better utilization of IT resources available for learning.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Information and Communication Technology</kwd><kwd> Medical Studies</kwd><kwd> Literacy</kwd><kwd> Training</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Information and communication technologies (ICTs) allow greater diffusion of information, interactivity, and asynchronism and can promote individual as well as collective work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] and then provide a better quality of life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Nowadays, major aspects of human life are connected to the world of ICTs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref5">5</xref>]. That will continue to evolve and become more integrated into all facets of our professional and personal environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref7">7</xref>]. Then it is important to follow this technological progress in all areas and incorporate it into teaching methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>ICT can be a valuable tool to bring didactic and pedagogical added value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref10">10</xref>], and contribute to the development of innovative training activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref11">11</xref>]. ICT’s role in education is becoming increasingly important [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref7">7</xref>], and it has become more evident than ever during the COVID 19 crisis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref12">12</xref>]. It can provide better access to educational resources, improve the quality of learning, improve teacher’s productivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref10">10</xref>], and enhances student’s participation, collaboration, and communication which can improve their success rate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref4">4</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref10">10</xref>], especially in medicine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>According to the recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA), it is necessary not only for IT specialists but also equally important for students of medicine, public health workers and clinicians, to become familiar with ICT educational tools used in their learning and/or practice environments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref13">13</xref>]. In medical education, the need to update one’s knowledge to meet professional requirements is an ongoing challenge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>]. ICT has enhanced teaching and learning for improving global health education, providing access to health training, promoting collaboration in global health research and building research capacity in low- and middle-income countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref15">15</xref>]. It has also been proven to improve the quality of medical care [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>]. Then, it became an integral part of preparing doctors to be sufficiently competent to use informatics resources effectively and efficiently for the best practice of medicine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>In recent years, in most developed countries the application of ICT tools is increasingly becoming an absolutely vital component of the learning and teaching environment in many medical colleges [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>]. Many governments have integrated them in national strategies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref18">18</xref>].</p><p>In developing countries, many experiences of implementing different ICT tools in education are reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref19">19</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref24">24</xref>]. Nevertheless, they still face many challenges in keeping up with recent digital methods and new research techniques, especially in the higher education sector [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref25">25</xref>] and more particularly in healthcare learning institutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref5">5</xref>]. However, many studies have noticed that medical students are becoming more comfortable with computers, due to the increasing use of this tool before arriving at the university [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>In Moroccan medical schools, the introduction of ICT into the curriculum is growing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref26">26</xref>], as it is a part of the e-reform of undergraduate education currently ongoing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref8">8</xref>]. It mainly concerned the implementation of e-learning platforms and access to MOOCs platforms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref9">9</xref>]. However, Health services staff still need to develop basic ICT skills, and the current pedagogical systems need to benefit more from the implementation of advanced ICTs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>As the success of such reform depends on accessibility to the internet and the ICT ‘competencies of the users [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref8">8</xref>], it is important to assess the knowledge acquired and attitudes that they have towards their use [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref4">4</xref>]. Therefore, a new evaluation of the ICTs use in medical schools presents the first step to optimizing the change.</p><p>Then, our objective is to evaluate the level of knowledge and competency in the use of ICT tools and the need for training in medical staff in the faculty of medicine and pharmacy and dental medicine of Fez, Morocco.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>We conducted a cross-sectional study from May 2021 in the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy and dental medicine of Fez among various medical staff classes: professors, medical resident’s interns, and students. The sample calculation was based on an overall prevalence of computer literacy, and the literature search of 80%, according to its epidemiology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref20">20</xref>]. An error rate (α) of 5% and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were considered, resulting in a final sample consisting of 240 subjects.</p><p>To collect data, we used an anonymous questionnaire which was mainly organized into two sections about A) the level of knowledge and competency in the use of ICT tools and B) the perception of importance and the need for training in these tools. Each section was made of 20 questions about the main ICT tools used in medical education including the following items: 1) the general use of computers and the supports software such as Microsoft Office, 2) programming and creation of websites, 3) data management, 4) E-learning, and 5) scientific research. The questionnaire was sent electronically to the participants to be filled in.</p><p>Frequencies were used to characterize the respondent’s competency in the use of the ICTs. The Chi2 test was used in univariate analysis to test associations between the competency of the use of ICT’s tools and the participants’ medical class, the student’s study level and the gender of the participant. The statistical analysis was carried out by the data analysis software SPSS V26. The level of statistical significance for tests was set at 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>A total of 276 persons answered the questionnaire. About 52.5% of them are women, and 69% are students. Almost all participants had computers (95%) and access to the internet (98%). About one-quarter of participants had prior training in some ICT tools. 21% of those training were about literature research, and 88% were conducted by our faculty. More descriptive results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>Our study has shown that the mastery level of the ICT tools differs according to the tool concerned. It was generally high in word processing, presentation software, E-mail management and file management. It was also high in data management and videoconference. It was average for the LMS software, online interaction tools, spreadsheet and literature research in our study. The competency level was the worst for the medical data analysis, data management, and for programmatic and website creation.</p><p>The competency level was average for the LMS software, online interaction tools, spreadsheet and literature research in our study. A little less than one-third of participants had a great competency level in using the LMS. (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>)</p><p>Medical students in general and first-year medical students in particular (p &lt; 0.001) felt more confident with the use of the learning management system platform. The professors, the “resident”, and the sixth-year medical students are less confident (p &lt; 0.001). Also, students seem to master programming more than professors and “resident” (p = 0.04). In contrast, the professors, and the “residents” utilize bibliographic referencing software more than students (p = 0.022). The use of other ICT tools has no significant association with the participant’s profile or the level of study. (not shown in the table).</p><p>We also observed that the men are more confident and competent in using twelve of the twenty ICT tools questioned (p ranged between p &lt; 0.001 (for “the file management”, “installation of new devices”, “installation of new software”, and “website creation”) and p = 0.041 (for “video montage”)). The details of the results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>The second section was about the perception of the need for ICT tool training for each participant’ classes. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> showed that, for the four participants’ medical classes, the most needed tools are literature research (perceived as very important to know by 100% of Professors to 66% of medical interns), presentation software (perceived as very important to know by 93% of Professors to 68% of students), word processing (perceived as very important to know by 86% of Professors to 67% of students), and file management (perceived as very important to know by 73% of Professors to 50% of medical residents). Professors were also very interested in spreadsheet software (86% of them), and statistical analysis software (80% of them).</p><p>When asked, “What is the most appropriate method for learning to use ICTs”, about three-quarters of participants suggested organizing workshops to improve the use of ICT in medical school. The classroom was the least recommended</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Description of sociodemographic characteristics and the computer and internet access</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sex (n = 276)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Man</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Profile (n = 275)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Professor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interne</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical resident</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Study level (n = 191)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1st year student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2nd year student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3rd year student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4th year student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5th year student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6th year student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Do you own a computer? (n = 276)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I have a desktop computer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I have a laptop computer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Frequency of internet access (n = 276)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Full-time</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >From time to time</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rarely</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Internet access site (n = 276)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >From your house</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Elsewhere</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Have you ever received an ICT training (n = 108)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >If so, what was the form of training (n = 26)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Classroom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Workshop</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >If so, what was the mode of training (n = 26)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Face-to-face</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Online</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >If so, where was the site of training (n = 26)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FMPDF*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Elsewhere</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Topic of the training (n = 26)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Google Apps</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Literature research</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E-learning &amp; LMS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*: Faculty of medicine and pharmacy and dental medicine of Fez.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Level of mastery of ICT tools by gender</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sex</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Femme</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Homme</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >GENERAL USE OF COMPUTER AND SUPPORT SOFTWARE</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >File management (n = 275)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Email management (n = 108)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Connecting and installing new hardware (n = 275)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Installing new software (n = 275)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Word processing (n = 275)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Presentation software (n = 275)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Spreadsheet software (n = 274)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Picture processing (n = 107)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Video montage (n = 108)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.041</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Literature research (n = 275)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Bibliographic referencing (n = 275)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >PROGRAMMING AND CREATION OF WEBSITES</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Website creation (n = 274)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Database software (n = 273)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Blog creation (n = 275)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.002</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Introduction to programming (n = 275)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >DATA MANAGEMENT &amp; DATA ANALYSIS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Statistical analysis (n = 108)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Data management (n = 275)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >E-LEARNING</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >LMS (n = 275)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.038</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Videoconference (n = 107)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Online interaction tools (n = 274)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.003</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>method (28% of participants). More study methods are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Our study has shown that the majority of participants had their own computers and had access to the internet. This finding has been demonstrated by other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref29">29</xref>].</p><p>The level of mastery of ICT tools was very heterogeneous and varied between 61% of persons that had a good level of competency in word processing and 67% of participants who did not have any knowledge of statistical analysis.</p><p>Studies in developed countries such as China [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] and Australia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref30">30</xref>], indicated that the level of computer literacy was high. That can be argued that the current students are “digital natives”. However, ICT was less used in education than ever else [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref29">29</xref>]. In developing countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref20">20</xref>], the frequency of computer skills generally exceeds 50%. This frequency was lesser in poor areas than in poor African countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref32">32</xref>]. The use of ICT among medical students is still low [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>]. The curricula for ICT use in health research fields remain considerably insufficient in developing countries compared to developed countries. This difference in perception of ICT literacy can also be explained by the lack of a common definition of a good level, and by the variety of ICT tools that can be included in medical studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p>The mastery level of the ICT tools differs according to the tool concerned. In our context, the competency level was high in word processing, presentation software, Email management and file management, as they are used in daily activities. It was also high in data management and videoconference.</p><p>According to the literature, the mastered ICT skills was mostly the emails management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref34">34</xref>], text messaging [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref29">29</xref>]</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref35">35</xref>], word processing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref36">36</xref>], presenting software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref29">29</xref>]. Also, studies that investigated the use of ICTs were mainly focused on the literature and data search [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref36">36</xref>]. They demonstrated, as in our study, that less than half of the participants considered that their bibliographic research competency is good [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref36">36</xref>]. However, in some studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>], smaller proportions of students reported adequate skills in the usage of the internet. In contrast, in Uganda, 94% of the health sciences students reported using ICT for research and training purposes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>]. This result is consistent with those of previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref29">29</xref>]. Searching in medical journals is a useful method of learning and research. However, some skills are needed for physicians today to gather medical information from specialized electronic databases and for their quality assessment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref29">29</xref>].</p><p>Our study and others [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref33">33</xref>] described the competency in file management as good. As well, the data management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref20">20</xref>] and data analysis software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref15">15</xref>] were among the main ICT tools used in education. However, in our study, these skills were among the least mastered tools.</p><p>The competency level was average for the LMS software, online interaction tools, spreadsheet and literature research in our study. A little less than one-third of participants had a great competency level in using the LMS. This proportion was higher in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref29">29</xref>]. The spreadsheet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>] was less mastered in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>]. The database software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>], and the website design [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref22">22</xref>] were the least mastered ICT in the literature as well as in our study.</p><p>On the other hand, in several studies, men seem to be more confident and competent in using ICT tools, and have a higher attitude toward learning ICT based skills [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref37">37</xref>]. However, Iran’s study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref24">24</xref>] found no statistically significant difference between men and women in computer and internet use.</p><p>In our study, we also noticed that students in the first year of medical studies, and students in general were more confident with the use of the learning management system platform. That can be explained by the fact that young people are more interested in different computer tools independently of their medical studies. On the other hand, professors and medical residents are more competent in bibliographic referencing since they do more scientific research.</p><p>About one-quarter of our medical staff and about one-hird of Arabic students in many studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref20">20</xref>] had prior training in ICT skills. These courses were organized by their university or elsewhere. The major subject of these courses was the use of the Internet to search medical literature as an additional source for education and the evaluation of medical information [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref4">4</xref>]. However, in other experiences, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] almost all students have not had any training in ICT.</p><p>Despite the multiplicity of ICT tools, and in agreement with the results of our study as well as other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref36">36</xref>], participants indicated that ICT was a potentially important tool for their education and research, as it helps working faster and make learning creative [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref29">29</xref>]. They also state that ICT skills training should be a part of the medical curriculum and that it should be integrated into medical studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>When participants in our study and in other studies were asked about the most important ICT topics to be included in the curriculum, they raised that the most useful ICT tools are how to search resources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref26">26</xref>], word processing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref26">26</xref>], presentation software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref26">26</xref>], email management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref26">26</xref>], the knowledge of databases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>], the data management, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref6">6</xref>], and performing personal computer hygiene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref2">2</xref>]. Some of them were also interested in spreadsheet software, statistical analysis software, and online interaction tools [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref26">26</xref>]. However, some students [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref29">29</xref>], stated that they did not need ICT programs during medical training. This could indicate that some students were not knowledgeable about the potential of computer- and Web-based programs.</p><p>On the other hand, existing research has proven a positive relationship between the active and positive role of teachers and the successful implementation of ICT in the classrooms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref10">10</xref>]. However, the lack of continuous training is cited by many studies as one of the major barriers to integrating ICT in the classroom [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.119025-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>Our study has some limitations. First, we tried to explore many faces of ICT tool utilization, so every tool was explored just superficially. Then other studies must be conducted in the future to study each subject in detail. On the other hand, this work did not include the clinical use of ICT so as not to burden the questionnaire. This side of the question must be the subject of another study. Nevertheless, the findings of the current study should provide researchers with some initial insights that could be incorporated within the framework of any future ICT training programs.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Recommendations &amp; Conclusion</title><p>According to our results and to the literature, the improvement of ICT use in education must first be a decision of the relevant authorities to set up ICT training programs for the medical profession. It is probably important to deeply review curricula so that it is not simply an optional additional resource added to conventional transmissive teaching devices but rather tools used throughout medical teaching and practice in an integrated and continuous character of medical education. Nevertheless, the benefits of Information Technology depend on the way they are being used. Then, all teachers and students need both to be integrated into such a training program and to develop sufficient flexibility to acquire ICT skills, which can assure the long-term success of the improvement strategy.</p><p>Also, as the term ICT is vaguely used across studies, future studies should clearly define the scopes of activities that are covered to describe ICT, and to identify the specific ICT tools that have more effectiveness over others.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank all the participants, students, medical internet, medical residents, and professors in the faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy and Dental medicine in Fez Morocco for their participation in the study.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Otmani, N., Qarmiche, N., Bourkhime, H., Omari, M., Chakri, I., Maiouak, M., El Harch, I., Maamar, S.B., Diagne, B.J., Bahra, N., Tachfouti, N. and El Fakir, S. (2022) Information and Communication Technology Literacy in Medical Studies in Fez Morocco. Open Access Library Journal, 9: e9061. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109061</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.119025-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Denef, J.F. (2001) Les nouvelles technologies de l’information et de la communication (NTIC) dans la formation médicale, au service de l’acquisition et du développement des compétences professionnelles. Pédagogie Médicale, 2, 42-50.  
https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed:2001013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, K., Abdullah, A.S., Ma, Z., Urmi, D.S., He, H., Quintiliani, L., et al. (2019) Attitudes of Chinese Health Sciences Postgraduate Students’ to the Use of Information and Communication Technology in Global Health Research. BMC Medical Education, 19, Article No. 367. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1785-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Houcine, M., Amine, M., Hamida, M. and Zoubeir, B. (2018) Intérêt pédagogique des technologies de l’information et de la communication dans l’apprentissage médical. The Pan African Medical Journal, 29, Article No. 111.  
https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.29.111.13795</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Milic, N.M., Ilic, N., Stanisavljevic, D.M., Andja, M., et al. (2018) Bridging the Gap between Informatics and Medicine upon Medical School Entry: Implementing a Course on the Applicative Use of ICT. PLOS ONE, 13, e0194194.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194194</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weine, S., Bosland, M., Rao, C., Edison, M., Ansong, D., Chamberlain, S., et al. (2021) Global Health Education amidst COVID-19: Disruptions and Opportunities. Annals of Global Health, 87, 12. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3088</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bayomy, H., El Awadi, M., El Araby, E. and Abed, H.A. (2016) Computer-Based Medical Education in Benha University, Egypt: Knowledge, Attitude, Limitations, and Suggestions. Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association, 91, 179-184.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Mamary, Y.H.S. (2022) Examining the Factors Affecting the Use of ICT in Teaching in Yemeni Schools. Journal of Public Affairs, 22, e2330.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hattab, N.M., Lahmiti, S., Ben Abdelaziz, A., Saidi, H. and Fikry, T. (2010) Internet and Medical Student in Marrakech. Annals of African Medicine, 9, 68-71.  
https://doi.org/10.4103/1596-3519.64756</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maataoui, A.E. and Chaouir, S. (2016) L’utilisation des nouvelles technologies éducatives en formation médicale initiale Une enquête à la faculté de médecine et de pharmacie de Casablanca. Pédagogie Médicale, 17, 213-215.  
https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed/2017005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Esfijani, A. and Zamani, B.E. (2020) Factors Influencing Teachers’ Utilisation of ICT: The Role of In-Service Training Courses and Access. Research in Learning Technology, 28, Article No. 2313. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2313 
https://journal.alt.ac.uk/index.php/rlt/article/view/2313</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dris, S., Zaghez, M. and Benkemouche, A. (2015) Connaissances et attitudes des étudiants en médecine dentaire de l’université d’Annaba à l’égard des NTIC. Facultad de Medicina, 3, 26-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferede, B., Elen, J., Van Petegem, W., Hunde, A.B. and Goeman, K. (2022) Determinants of Instructors’ Educational ICT Use in Ethiopian Higher Education. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 917-936.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10606-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mantas, J., Ammenwerth, E., Demiris, G., Hasman, A., Haux, R., Hersh, W., et al. (2010) Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics. First Revision. Methods of Information in Medicine, 49, 105-120. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME5119</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J., Abdullah, A.S., Ma, Z., Fu, H., Huang, K., Yu, H., et al. (2017) Building Capacity for Information and Communication Technology Use in Global Health Re-search and Training in China: A Qualitative Study among Chinese Health Sciences Faculty Members. Health Research Policy and Systems, 15, 59.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0222-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, Z., Yang, L., Yang, L., Huang, K., Yu, H., He, H., et al. (2017) Developing a Curriculum for Information and Communications Technology Use in Global Health Research and Training: A Qualitative Study among Chinese Health Sciences Graduate Students. JMIR Medical Education, 3, e11.  
https://doi.org/10.2196/mededu.6590</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buabbas, A.J., Al-Shawaf, H.M.H. and Almajran, A.A. (2016) Health Sciences Students’ Self-Assessment of Information and Communication Technology Skills and Attitude toward e-Learning. JMIR Medical Education, 2, e9.  
https://doi.org/10.2196/mededu.5606</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quérin, S., Tardif, D., Messier, J.P. and Ratelle, R. (2001) Ma&amp;icirc;trise de l’ordinateur et de l’information: Une formation intégrée et continue au premier cycle des études médicales. Pédagogie Médicale, 2, 108-113. https://doi.org/10.1051/pmed:2001018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bauk, S.I. (2015) Assessing Students’ Perception of E-Learning in Blended Environment: An Experimental Study. The Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 323-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.393</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Richardson, J.E., Bouquin, D.R., Tmanova, L.L. and Wright, D. (2015) Information and Informatics Literacies of First-Year Medical Students. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103, 198-202. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rajab, L.D. and Baqain, Z.H. (2005) Use of Information and Communication Technology among Dental Students at the University of Jordan. Journal of Dental Education, 69, 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2005.69.3.tb03927.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghasempour, M., Jarideh, S., et al. (2014) The Impact of Computer and Information Communication Technology Literacy on the Academic Achievement of Medical and Dental Students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. European Scientific Journal, 10, 273-280.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Robabi, H. and Arbabisarjou, A. (2015) Computer Literacy among Students of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. Global Journal of Health Science, 7, 136-142.  
https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n4p136</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Safar, A.H. and AlKhezzi, F.A. (2013) Beyond Computer Literacy: Technology Integration and Curriculum Transformation. College Student Journal, 47, 614-626.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayatollahi, A., Ayatollahi, J., Ayatollahi, F., Ayatollahi, R. and Shahcheraghi, S.H. (2014) Computer and Internet Use among Undergraduate Medical Students in Iran. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 30, 1054-1058.  
https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.305.5355</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tadesse, S. and Muluye, W. (2020) The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Education System in Developing Countries: A Review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 159-170. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.810011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sefiani, S. (2019) Les TIC et les enjeux d’intégration d’un apprentissage coopératif au sein de l’université marocaine. In: Questions de Pédagogies dans l’Enseignement Supérieur, ENSTA Bretagne, IMT-A, UBO, Brest.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wensing, M., Paech, B., Roth, C. and Schwill, S. (2019) Learning, Understanding and the Use of Information Technology: A Survey Study among Primary Care Physician Trainees. BMC Health Services Research, 19, Article No. 728.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4615-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otmani, N., Serhier, Z., Housbane, S., Benloubir, D. and Othmani, M.B. (2015) Méthodes de recherche d’informations et de sauvegarde chez les étudiants de la faculté de médecine et de pharmacie de Casablanca. Revue Marocaine de Santé Publique, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2014.06.151</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khamis, N., Aljumaiah, R., Alhumaid, A., Alraheem, H., Alkadi, D., Koppel, C., et al. (2018) Undergraduate Medical Students’ Perspectives of Skills, Uses and Preferences of Information Technology in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Saudi Medical College. Medical Teacher, 40, S68-S76.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1465537</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Orlando, J. (2014) Teachers’ Changing Practices with Information and Communication Technologies: An Up-Close, Longitudinal Analysis. Research in Learning Technology, 22, 21354. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.21354</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ajuwon, G.A. (2003) Computer and Internet Use by First Year Clinical and Nursing Students in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 3, Article No. 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-3-10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Woreta, S.A., Kebede, Y. and Zegeye, D.T. (2013) Knowledge and Utilization of Information Communication Technology (ICT) among Health Science Students at the University of Gondar, North Western Ethiopia. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13, Article No. 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-31</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samuel, M., Coombes, J.C., Miranda, J.J., Melvin, R., Young, E.J. and Azarmina, P. (2004) Assessing Computer Skills in Tanzanian Medical Students: An Elective Experience. BMC Public Health, 4, Article No. 37.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-4-37</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Williams, C.D., Pitchforth, E.L. and O’Callaghan, C. (2010) Computers, the Internet and Medical Education in Africa. Medical Education, 44, 485-488.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03602.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fan, S., Radford, J. and Fabian, D. (2016) A Mixed-Method Research to Investigate the Adoption of Mobile Devices and Web2.0 Technologies among Medical Students and Educators. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16, Article No. 43.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0283-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwozichi, C.U., Marcial, D.E., Farotimi, A.A., Escabarte, A.B.S. and Madu, A.M. (2019) Integration of Information and Communication Technology in Nursing Education in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8, 141. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_240_18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.119025-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aldebasi, Y.H. and Ahmed, M.I. (2013) Computer and Internet Utilization among the Medical Students in Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 7, 1105-1108. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/5891.3092</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>