<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJOHNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head &amp; Neck Surgery</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2168-5452</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijohns.2022.114021</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJOHNS-118957</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Deafness: Epidemiological, Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects in 15 Year Olds and over at the University Hospital Center Gabriel Toure of Bamako
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kassim</surname><given-names>Diarra</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>N’faly</surname><given-names>Konaté</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yaya</surname><given-names>Dembele</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ismael</surname><given-names>Berthé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Drissa</surname><given-names>Kaloga Bagayoko</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Boubacary</surname><given-names>Guindo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fatogoma</surname><given-names>Issa Koné</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Siaka</surname><given-names>Soumaoro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Doumbia</surname><given-names>Kadidiatou Singare</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>Amadou Keita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>ENT and Head and Neck Surgery Department, university hospital Gabriel Toure, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Armies Polyclinic of the Kati, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Anesthesia Resuscitation CHU Mother-Child “Luxembourg”, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>07</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>202</fpage><lpage>210</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  <b>Objective:</b>
   To study the epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects of hearing loss in 15-year-olds and over at the CHU GT of Bamako. <b>Materials and Method:</b> This is a longitudinal prospective study carried out in the ENT department of the University hospital Gabriel Toure in Bamako over 13 months (from September 2018 to September 2019). We carried out an exhaustive sampling of all the patients who consulted in the department for hearing loss and whose deafness was confirmed at pure tone audiometry with age greater than or equal to 15 years. The exclusion criteria were all patients under the age of 15 as well as 
  a 
  hearing loss related to earwax or foreign bodies and refusals to participate in the study. <b>Results:</b> Two hundred and thirty (230) patients were collected during the study. Dominated by the male sex with a sex ratio of 1.5 or 3 men for 2 women, with an average age of 38.16 &#177; 19 years with extremes ranging from 15 to 86 years. Among our patients
  ,
   37.40% had unilateral deafness, progressive installation evolving more than 12 weeks with a rate of cases had headaches 41% and had a history of chronic otitis media (CMO) 27%. There were a few cases of mixed type deafness, 30% had mild deafness, 22% moderate deafness and 40% severe deafness
  ,
   according to the BIAP classification. Among our patients
  ,
   22.16% had conductive hearing 
  loss, 
  and 
  those with sensorineural hearing loss accounted for 15.24%. <b>Conclusion:</b> Pure tone audiometry remains essential in the diagnosis of
   deafness. It not only makes it possible to confirm or invalidate the deafness, 
  but 
  also to define the type of deafness and especially to classify the deafness according to the degree of the average hearing loss established by the BIAP.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pure Tone Audiometry Deafness BIAP</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Hearing plays a fundamental role in social and professional communication [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref1">1</xref>]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 466 million people suffer from disabling hearing loss worldwide, including 34 million children. For France, Inserm estimates that deafness affects 6% of 15 - 24 years old, and more than 65% of people aged 65 and over [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref2">2</xref>]. Early detection and treatment of hearing loss at any age are essential. It leads to social isolation, depression and an accelerated decline in cognitive functions. Diagnosis requires otoscopy and confirmation of the type and degree of hearing loss by audiometry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref3">3</xref>]. However, the etiological diagnosis constitutes the major problem as well as its therapeutic management.</p><p>In Mali, while certain aspects of deafness have been the subject of studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref4">4</xref>], there was no specific study dealing with it as a whole. Thus we evoked it in its entirety in order to have a database in the service and compared our results with the data of the literature while setting the objective of describing the clinical and therapeutic epidemiological aspects of hearing loss in patients aged 15 and over at the University hospital Gabriel Toure, Bamako.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>This is a longitudinal prospective study carried out in the ENT department of the University hospital Gabriel Toure in Bamako over 13 months (from September 2018 to September 2019). We made an exhaustive sampling of all patients who consulted for hearing loss. Thus we have collected two hundred and thirty (230) cases of all forms of hearing loss confirmed by pure tone audiometry.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Inclusion Criteria</title><p>Minimum age patient 15 years and older.</p><p>Hypoacusis confirmed by pure tone audiometry.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Non-Inclusion Criteria</title><p>Patients under 15 years and older.</p><p>Hearing loss related to earwax plugs or foreign bodies.</p><p>Refusal to participate in the study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Collection Technique</title><p>The information was obtained using our questionnaire established for this purpose, either by the patient himself or his parents in the event of severe hearing loss or speech impairment. The recording of the data was done on our survey sheet. The enrollment of patients went through a procedure, which consisted of:</p><p>- Selection for consultation according to the reason for consultation: hypoacusis, tinnitus, vertigo, blast, employment report, medical expertise, among others.</p><p>- Enrollment according to the inclusion criteria.</p><p>- The otorrhea was previously aspirated.</p><p>- Reference to the audiometric unit: receive the patient, install him and explain to him the procedure and the expected results.</p><p>- Implementation of the examination, which begins with the air conduction of the better ear, then the other and ends with the bone conduction of the better ear.</p><p>- Analysis and interpretation of results.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. The Ethical Aspect</title><p>This is a purely scientific work that aims to improve the management of hearing loss. Anonymity is strictly respected. The results will be used to improve the quality of care for patients with hearing loss. The consent of the patients or their relatives (accompanying) was obtained beforehand.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Variables Studied</title><p>- Socio-demographic data (age, sex, profession, residence),</p><p>- Clinical data (reason for consultation, mode of onset, medical and surgical history, associated otological signs),</p><p>- Paraclinical data (threshold tonal audiometry),</p><p>- Therapeutic data.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Data Processing and Analysis</title><p>Data were analyzed using Epi info-version 3.5.3 software. The graphs were made on EXCEL office 2019.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Two hundred and thirty (230) patients were collected during the study period. The age group between 26 and 35 years was the most represented with a rate of 23% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Dominated by the male sex with a sex ratio of 1.5 or 3 men for 2 women, the average age was 38.16 years with extremes ranging from 15 to 86 years. Breeders were the most represented with a rate of 20%, followed by merchants 11%, students 10.4%, workers 10%, and housewives at 9.6%. The majority of patients were brought to the consultation by their parents, i.e., a rate of 51.3% of cases.</p><p>Clinically, 70% of our patients had hypoacusis associated with tinnitus; it was bilateral in 56.1% with a duration of evolution greater than 12 weeks in 43%.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Representation of patients according to age group</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age group</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 - 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 - 45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 - 55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 - 65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >66 - 75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >76 et plus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Chronic otitis media was the most found ATCD in 27%. The examination of the external auditory canal was normal in 77.4%; on the other hand, the otoscopy of the eardrum found a unilateral or bilateral tympanic perforation in 62.16%, a unilateral or bilateral retraction pocket 6.08% and 3.04%. In 66.08%, the deafness was transmission type on audiometry and it was average in 51.30% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Computed tomography performed in 116 cases was in favor of chronic non- cholesteatomatous otomastoiditis in 68.09%. Simple chronic otitis media (CMO) with an open eardrum was the most common causal pathology found in 52.17% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). 64.40% of average hearing loss was due to chronic otitis media (CMO) with the open eardrum, while 33.33% of deep deafness was due to acute sound trauma (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Of the 230 patients in our series, 65 patients received medical treatment, 12 patients received hearing aids and 153 or 66.52% of patients received ear surgery. Thus we performed a tympanoplasty alone or associated with an antrotomy in 110 patients, Type II tympanoplasty in 18 patients, a petromastoid recess in 9 cases, a mastoatticotomy in 8 cases, a stapedectomy in 4 cases, a meatoplasty in 3 cases and one case of cochlear implant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion and Comments</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Methodological Aspect</title><p>During this study, we were limited by a number of issues such as:</p><p>- Calibration of the audiometer.</p><p>- The educational level of patients to differentiate sound from vibration.</p><p>- The change of address of certain patients or contact persons in Bamako.</p><p>- Failure to keep appointments for post-operative check-ups by some patients.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Aspect Hospital Frequency</title><p>According to new WHO estimates, 466 million people worldwide have disabling hearing loss, 34 million of them children. It is estimated that by 2050, more than 900 million people, or one in 10 people, will suffer from disabling hearing loss [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref2">2</xref>] During the study period, we recorded 7035 outpatient admissions, of which 915 patients, or 13% benefited from an audiometric examination and 230 patients</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Representation of patients according to mean hearing loss</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hearing loss</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lightweight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Severe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >deep</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cophosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Representation of patients according to the causal pathology</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Causal pathology</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simple CMO with open tympanum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >atelectatic otitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cholesteatomatous CMO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tympanosclerosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Presbycusis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Otosclerosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chronic sound trauma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acute sound trauma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >External auditory meatus stenosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >rock fracture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to the correlation between the causal pathology and the mean hearing loss</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Pathologies</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >PAM (en dB)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 - 70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71 - 90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91 - 119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120 et plus</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simple CMO with open tympanum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tympanosclerosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >atelectatic otitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cholesteatomatous CMO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Presbycusis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Otosclerosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >External auditory meatus stenosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acute sound trauma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chronic sound trauma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >rock fracture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Representation of patients according to the treatment performed</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tympanoplasty type I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >hearing aid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cochlear implant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meatoplasty</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tympanoplasty type II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antrotomy plus type 1 tympanoplasty</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mastoatticotomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Petrostoid recess</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stapedectomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>or 3.26% met our criteria. This study corroborates that previously carried out in the department [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref4">4</xref>]. Some studies from sub-Saharan Africa share this same observation. For example, in Burkina Faso, it affects 1,500,000 people according to the study conducted by Zoungrana P [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref5">5</xref>]. But European studies on the subject have found frequencies clearly higher than our series. Thus in France, the prevalence of deafness is estimated at 8.7% or 5,182,000 people with all degrees of deafness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref2">2</xref>]. This hospital frequency does not represent the prevalence of deafness in the general population, it just gives an overview of the activities of the service.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Gender Appearance</title><p>In our study, the male sex was the most affected at 54.35% against 45.65% of the female sex, i.e., a sex ratio of 1.19. This observation was shared by several authors in the sub-region who found similar results during their various works with respectively 57.6%; 62.55%; 50.51% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref7">7</xref>]. This high rate of males can be explained by the fact that males are generally more exposed to ENT pathologies, particularly otological conditions, but also their frequentation in noisy environments (professions or hobbies) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref8">8</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Appearance Age</title><p>The age group between 25 and 35 years old was the most represented with a rate of 23%, the average age was 37.62 years old with extremes of 15 and 80 years old in our study. This age group corresponds to that of the young population. Recall that according to the National Institute of Statistics in Mali, the population aged 15 to 65 constitutes 81.7% of the Malian population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref9">9</xref>]. At this young age, hearing is essential in human relations; therefore, any decrease in this hearing is quickly perceived by the individual and motivates a consultation. In fact, it is at this age that learning needs hearing more than ever and it is at this age that an individual takes good care or rather is more attentive to his person.</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Clinical Aspects</title><p>Our patients consulted for bilateral hypoacusis in 56.1%. This situation is attributable to the fact that the discomfort becomes more and more perceptible, so the patient is forced to seek a solution. This is superimposed on the severity and the type of deafness. Our results were corroborated by the results of certain studies in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref11">11</xref>]. In our work, 70.00% of our patients had hypoacusis associated with tinnitus and in 13.4% of cases with otorrhea. According to a previous study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref4">4</xref>] in the same department, tinnitus was the sign most associated with deafness in 46.22%. According to Londero [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref12">12</xref>], tinnitus is often the only auditory sign associated with deafness and more than 80% of patients with tinnitus have an abnormal audiogram. In our study, the eardrum was pathological in 83.04% with unilateral or bilateral perforation in 62.16% of cases. The initial otoscopic examination makes it possible to determine two main entities: deafness with pathological otoscopy and deafness with normal otoscopy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref13">13</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4_6"><title>4.6. Audiometric Aspects</title><p>Bilateral deafness was the most represented with a rate of 56.1%. We also recorded 66.08% conductive deafness, 17.81% sensorineural deafness and 16.08% mixed deafness. We were able to distinguish five (5) different degrees of deafness in accordance with the BIAP classification. Moderate deafness was the most common with a rate of 51.30%, it was mild in 20.13% and severe in 14.78%. Most of the patients only consulted when the deafness became socially embarrassing, when they had difficulty communicating. At this degree of hearing loss, speech is only perceived when the voice is raised. We recorded four (4) cases of Cophosis, i.e., 0.86%. Our results are close to those of the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref6">6</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4_7"><title>4.7. Etiological Aspects</title><p>In our study, otological damage of infectious origin was mainly found in approximately 83.47% and among its causes 52.17% was linked to simple chronic otitis media with an open eardrum, 11.30% to otitis cholesteatomatosis against 14.34% of deafness etiologies with the normal eardrum. In general, the impact of a painful ear with otorrhoea panics the patient and his entourage, which may explain their motivation to be consulted. Computed tomography of the rocks and magnetic resonance imaging are necessary to support the etiological assessment. CT was our radiological examination of choice. We asked for it in 116 cases or 50.43% and it was in favor of chronic cholesteatomatous otomastoiditis in 26 cases or 11.30%, in 9 cases or 3.91%, it was in favor of otosclerosis. We have only used MRI because it has only recently become available in our country and its cost remains extremely high for our population.</p></sec><sec id="s4_8"><title>4.8. Therapeutic Aspects</title><p>In our study, multiple treatments were proposed ranging from hearing aids to surgery as well as medical treatments. Of the 230 patients in our series, 65 patients received medical treatment, 12 patients received hearing aids and 153 or 66.52% of patients received ear surgery. Thus we performed a tympanoplasty alone or associated with an antrotomy in 110 patients, Type II tympanoplasty in 18 patients, a petromastoid recess in 9 cases, and a mastoatticotomy in 8 cases, a stapedectomy in 4 cases, a meatoplasty in 3 cases and a cochlear implant case. In general, surgery remains the main indication in the management of chronic otitis media and some of its sequelae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118957-ref13">13</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Pure tone audiometry remains essential in the diagnosis of deafness. It not only makes it possible to confirm or invalidate the deafness, but also to define the type of deafness and especially to classify the deafness according to the degree of the average hearing loss established by the BIAP. Keywords: pure tone audiometry, deafness, BIAP.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Diarra, K., Konat&#233;, N., Dembele, Y., Berth&#233;, I., Bagayoko, D.K., Guindo, B., Kon&#233;, F.I., Soumaoro, S., Singare, D.K. and Keita, M.A. (2022) Deafness: Epidemiological, Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects in 15 Year Olds and over at the University Hospital Center Gabriel Toure of Bamako. International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head &amp; Neck Surgery, 11, 202-210. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijohns.2022.114021</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.118957-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Espitalier, F., Durand, N., Boyer, J., Gayet-Delacroix, M. and Malard, P. (2012) Bordure stratégie diagnostic devant une surdité de l’adulte. Encycl. Med Chir, Edition Scientifique et Médicale, Elsevier SAS, Paris, 11 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118957-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Organisation mondiale de la Sante (2015) Surdité et déficience auditive: Aide mémoire n&amp;#176;300.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118957-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bakhos, D., Aussedat, C., Legris, E., Aoustin, J.-M. and Nevoux, J. (2017) Les surdites de l’adulte: Vers de nouveaux paradigmes. La Presse Medicale, 46, 1033-1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2017.09.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118957-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kassim, D., Boubacary, G. and Youssouf, S. (2020) Audiometric Profile of Deafness at the University Hospital Center Gabriel Toure of Bamako. International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head &amp; Neck Surgery, 9, 38-45. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijohns.2020.91006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118957-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zoungrana, P. (2011) Le développement holistique de la personne sourde et malentendante. Etats généraux de la surdité en Afrique de l’Ouest et du Centre, Ouagadougou, 23-25 Novembre 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118957-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adjibabi, W., Djomo, I.A., Lawson-Afouda, S., Avakoudjo, F., Hounkpatin, S.R., Wannou, V. and Huonkpe, Y.Y. (2009) Profil audio-metrique des surdites a Cotonou. IV&lt;sup&gt;e&lt;/sup&gt;congres ordinnaire de la societe benino-togolaise d’ORL (SOBETORL), Cotonou.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118957-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poumale, F., Gamba, E.P. and Nali, M.N. (2012) Depistage de surdite dans les ecoles fondamentales I de Bangui. Journal Tunisien d’ORL et de Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, 28, 18-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118957-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feder, K., Michaud, D., Ramage-Morin, P., McNamee, J. and Beauregard, Y. (2015) Prevalence of Hearing Loss among Canadians Aged 20 to 79: Audiometric Results from the 2012/2013 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Reports, 26, 18-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118957-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Institut National de la Statistique du Mali (2012) Enquete demographique de la sante au Mali (EDSM-V).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118957-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martin, F.N., Champlin, C.A. and McCreery, T.M. (2001) Strategies Used in Feigning Hearing Loss. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 12, 59-63.https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1745581</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118957-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guerra, T.M., Estevanovic, L.P., de Avila Meira Cavalcante, M., et al. (2010) Profile of Audiometric Thresholds and Tympanometric Curve of Elderly Patients. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 76, 663-666. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000500022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118957-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Londero, A., Avan, P. and Bonfils, P. (2008) Acouphènes subjectifs et objectifs: Aspect Clinique et thérapeutique. EMC Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, 23, 1-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118957-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tran Ba Huy</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>Les formes cliniques des otites chroniques. Histoires élémentaire et formes cliniques</article-title><source> EMC-Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 26</fpage>-<lpage>61</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>