<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AiM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Microbiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3402</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aim.2022.127031</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AiM-118934</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  &lt;i&gt;In Vitro&lt;/i&gt; Screening of Endophytic &lt;i&gt;Trichoderma&lt;/i&gt; sp. Isolated from Oil Palm in FGV Plantation against &lt;i&gt;Ganoderma boninense&lt;/i&gt;
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elya</surname><given-names>Masya Mohd Fishal</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ili</surname><given-names>Bazilah Abd Razak</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nor</surname><given-names>Hidayah Bohari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muhammad</surname><given-names>Ashraf Arif Mohd Nasir</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Crop Protection and Biosolution Department, FGV R &amp;amp; D Sdn Bhd, Bandar Enstek, Malaysia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>07</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>443</fpage><lpage>457</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The potential of several endophytic 
  Trichoderma isolates, isolated from healthy oil palm roots was assessed against 
  Ganoderma boninense (PER71), the causal agent of Basal Stem Rot (BSR) disease through in 
  vitro screening. In the dual culture assay, all endophytic 
  Trichoderma isolates were found to be capable of inhibiting the growth of PER71 mycelium, by causing more than 70% inhibition of the pathogen’s radial growth (PIRG). 
  Trichoderma asperellum M103 has caused the highest inhibition at 93.14%. The volatile compound produced by M103 also suppressed 65% of the pathogen’s radial growth. On the other hand, 
  T. harzianum, M108 was found to have the ability to produce non-volatile compounds that is toxic and it has effectively inhibited 98.18% of the growth of PER71. Collectively, 
  T. asperellum M103 and 
  T. harzianum M108 have the potential to inhibit the growth of 
  G. boninense PER71. These isolates were shown to be viable options for the future management of 
  G. boninense in the oil palm field.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Endophytic &lt;i&gt;Trichoderma&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Ganoderma boninense&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;In Vitro&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Oil Palm</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Basal Stem Rot (BSR) disease in oil palm caused by Ganoderma boninense is one of the significant diseases which can affect oil palm yield in Malaysia’s most productive area. With no effective control measures, the total acreage of oil palm plantations infected with BSR disease has continuously grown year after year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref1">1</xref>]. Chemical solutions may only provide rudimentary control and are not favorable due to their environmental impact [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref2">2</xref>]. As the world’s third largest oil palm estate operator, FGV is dedicated to implementing a sustainable management system for pests and diseases, including BSR, in FGV oil palm estates.</p><p>Interest in using biological control agents (BCAs), especially Trichoderma sp. for disease management, apparently has gained much attention from agriculture industries. Trichoderma sp. which is commonly found in the soil and rhizosphere root ecosystem, provides a variety of benefits including controlling soil-borne pathogens through mycoparasitism, competition for nutrients and space, as well as the ability to produce antifungal metabolites that are toxic to a variety of plant pathogens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref5">5</xref>]. On top of that, hundreds of Trichoderma-based products have been released in the market and become popular due to their being inexpensive and high viability after long-term storage. The products are also user-friendly and sustainable for the environment. Trichoderma harzianum, T. virens, and T. hamatum have shown potential effects against G. boninense both in vitro and in the field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref6">6</xref>]. Recently, research has shown that Trichoderma sp., which is classified as an endophyte, has been successfully isolated from cocoa trees [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref7">7</xref>] and oil palm roots [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref8">8</xref>]. This characteristic gives the privilege for the microbes to colonize and sustain their population in the internal plant tissues without causing any harm to the plant. Due to this special characteristic, the endophytic Trichoderma would be sustained in the root region of the plant for a certain period and provide ample protection to the plant against pests and diseases.</p><p>However, information on the effect of endophytic Trichoderma sp. on Ganoderma sp. is still insufficient. Therefore, this study was conducted to isolate potential endophytic Trichoderma and evaluate their antagonistic effects against G. boninense, through dual cultures as well as the production of volatile and non-volatile compounds.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Root Sampling and Isolation</title><p>The sampling activities were conducted at FGV plantations, in Malaysia. The root samples were collected within the radius of the palm canopy and stored at 4˚C prior to the isolation process. Endophytic Trichoderma was isolated from healthy oil palm roots and cultured on Martin’s Rose Bengal (MRB) agar, one of the selective media for Trichoderma isolation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref9">9</xref>]. All the root samples were surface sterilized [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref10">10</xref>]. Root samples were cut into 10 cm lengths and cleaned under running tap water to remove the debris. About 0.5 cm was then removed from both tips. The remaining roots were cut into 3 cm lengths. Roots were surface sterilized in 10% sodium hypochlorite for two minutes, then in 50%, 70%, 90%, and 99% ethanol for 30 seconds each, before rinsing three times with sterile distilled water (SDW). The root samples were then allowed to dry on sterilized filter paper. Once dried, 1 cm of the ends of each section was discarded. The cuticle from the middle section was removed, cut into two sections of 0.5 cm each and placed on MRB. Petri dishes were incubated at 28˚C &#177; 2˚C for 7 days. The distinguished individual colonies were subcultured onto Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) (Oxoid) plates and were then incubated for 7 days. The pure cultures were finally maintained until further testing.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Dual Culture Assay</title><p>A total of 14 endophytic Trichoderma isolates that was successfully isolated were screened for their antagonistic potential against Ganoderma boninense (PER71), obtained from Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB) through dual culture assay [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref11">11</xref>]. Approximately 5 mm plug agar of PER71 was subcultured at 1 cm from the 90 mm Petri plate’s circumference, while 5 mm plug agar of endophytic Trichoderma was inoculated opposite the PER71 agar plug (1 cm from circumference of Petri plate). Another Petri plate, which was only subcultured with PER71, was prepared as control. All the endophytic Trichoderma isolates in dual culture assay were incubated at 28˚C &#177; 2˚C for seven days. Percentage of inhibition radial growth (PIRG) was then measured based on the formula as below:</p><p>( % ) PIRG = [ ( R1 − R2 ) / R1 ] &#215; 1 00</p><p>where, R1 = radial growth of PER71 (control); R2 = radial growth of PER71 in dual culture plate.</p><p>The number of days required by endophytic Trichoderma to completely overgrow PER71 was recorded. The shortest number of days indicates a significant antagonistic effect in dual culture assay [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref12">12</xref>]. Their ability to overgrow and inhibit the growth of PER71 was then scored according to Bell’s scale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref13">13</xref>]. where:</p><p>R1 = 100% overgrowth;</p><p>R2 = 75% overgrowth;</p><p>R3 = 50% overgrowth;</p><p>R4 = locked at the point of contact.</p><p>To evaluate the potential of PER71 to proliferate, the inhibition zone between endophytic Trichoderma and PER71 in a dual culture assay was plugged and subcultured onto a new PDA. The ability of PER71 to grow on the new PDA was observed.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Scanning Electron Microscope</title><p>Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation was conducted at Quasi-S Technology Sdn. Bhd. The inhibition zone from plates with the highest PIRG was examined for their hyphal interaction activity through SEM. The plug agar at the inhibition zone was cut into 1 cm<sup>3</sup> and fixed in 1% gluteraldehyde fixative for 12 - 24 hours at 4˚C. Phosphate buffer was then used to wash the sample. The sample was serially dehydrated with acetone concentrations; 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% and 100% for 20 minutes. After that, the samples were dried and coated with gold before viewing through SEM.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Production of Volatile Compounds</title><p>The double plate method was used to test the production of volatile compounds by endophytic Trichoderma candidates against G. boninense PER71. A 5 mm plug agar of all examined endophytic Trichoderma (5 days old) and PER71 (7 days old) were cultured on the center of PDA at 28˚C &#177; 2˚C. After 24 hours, the Petri plate covers of both Trichoderma and PER71 were removed. The plate containing endophytic Trichoderma culture was placed upside down on top of a plate containing PER71 culture. Both plates were tightly sealed together with parafilm to avoid any gap. The presence of gap between the plates may not only prohibit physical contact between the fungi but also prohibit the formation of volatile compounds by the tested Trichoderma. Another plate subcultured with PER71 alone was used as control. All culture plates were incubated at 28˚C &#177; 2˚C for 7 days to observe the PIRG.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Production of Non-Volatile Compounds</title><p>Culture filtrates methods against G. boninense PER71 were used to detect the production of non-volatile chemicals by endophytic Trichoderma isolates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref14">14</xref>]. A 5 mm plug agar of tested endophytic Trichoderma (5 days old) was inoculated into a 250 mL conical flask containing 100 mL sterilized potato dextrose broth (PDB) (Oxoid). The inoculated flasks were shaken on an orbital shaker at 28 &#177; 2˚C for 7 days at 150 rpm. The harvested culture filtrate was first filtered through a filter paper and finally filtered through a filtrate membrane filter sized 0.45 &#181;m. The final filtrate of endophytic Trichoderma was collected and mixed with double strength molten sterile PDA (50˚C) at ratio 1:1. The mixture of PDA and culture filtrate were then poured into a Petri plate and allowed to solidify. A 5 mm plug agar of PER71 was cultured on the center of a Petri plate agar containing the mixture of filtrate and PDA. A plug agar of PER71 was cultured on PDA without any filtrate as control. The cultured plates were then incubated at 28˚C &#177; 2˚C and PIRG was measured after 7 days.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Species Identification</title><p>The species of two isolates of endophytic Trichoderma that showed significant potential in suppressing G. boninense PER71 in the in vitro study was identified. Mycelia and spores of the isolates were scraped from the agar plates and inoculated in 100 mL PDB before incubated at 30˚C for five days. The five-day old mycelia were then filtered and pulverized in liquid nitrogen. Genomic DNA was isolated from pulverized fungal mycelia according to in-house protocol. Terra<sup>TM</sup><sup> </sup>PSR DNA polymerase (Clontech) was used for the amplification of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of fungal genomic DNA using forward primer 5’ - TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G - 3’ and reverse primer 5’ - GGT GCG TGT TTC AAG AC - 3’. 16S rDNA was amplified from bacterial genomics DNA using forward primer 5’ - GGT TAC CCT ACG ACT T - 3’ and reverse primer 5’ - AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG - 3’. PCR product was purified, then ligated in pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega) and cloned in E. coli. Vectors carrying the insert were sent out to Apical Scientific Sdn. Bhd. for DNA sequencing service. Nucleotide sequence was analyzed at SIRIM and then searched against Genbank database of the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) programme [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref15">15</xref>]. Species identification was determined according to the homology search results from NCBI database. The nucleotide sequence of the two isolates was deposited to NCBI database. A phylogenetic tree was performed using MEGA (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis) version 9.0, generated through neighbour joining with bootstrap analysis using 1,000 replicates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref16">16</xref>]. Published sequences available in NCBI were retrieved and used for phylogenetic analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis</title><p>All the in vitro screening studies were conducted in Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with five replications. Data were analyzed with SAS&#174; Software. The significant data was determined using Least Significant Different (LSD) test at 5% probability level. The percentage data were transformed into Arcsine transformation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref17">17</xref>] before subjected to ANOVA.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Isolation of Endophytic Trichoderma</title><p>A total of 14 endophytic Trichoderma isolates were successfully recovered from healthy oil palm root samples collected from various locations across the FGV plantation in Malaysia (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). After 3 to 7 days of being incubated at 28 &#177; 2˚C, the colonies of endophytic Trichoderma have emerged on the MRB agar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The morphology of the mycelium initially appeared as white hyphae and later developed into green conidiation on the fifth day after plating [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref8">8</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Dual Culture Assay</title><p>The antagonistic effect of endophytic Trichoderma isolates to suppress the mycelium growth of pathogenic G. boninense PER71 was observed through a dual culture assay. All endophytic Trichoderma isolates were found to be capable of suppressing the mycelium growth of PER71 with PIRG between 70.86% to 93.14% after 7 days of incubation. Isolate M103 has recorded the highest PIRG at 93.14% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The experiment was extended for another 7 days to observe their capability to overgrow the PER71 culture. Overall, all endophytic Trichoderma</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Number of endophytic Trichoderma isolates successfully isolated from oil palm heathy roots of FGV Plantation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of Isolates</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Location</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Taib Andak, Johor</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ulu Belitong, Johor</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sahabat 17, Sabah</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pusat Penyelidikan Pertanian Tun Razak, Pahang</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Antagonistic effect of endophytic Trichoderma isolates on pathogenic G. boninense PER71 in dual culture assay</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Isolates</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PIRG (%) &#177; SE (after 7 days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Day of isolate overgrown the PER71</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bell’s Ranking (after 9 days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Recovery at inhibition zone on PDA</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.14<sup>a</sup> &#177; 2.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.29<sup>ab</sup> &#177; 1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;14 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.86<sup>ab</sup> &#177; 5.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;14 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.99<sup>abc</sup> &#177; 4.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;14 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.28<sup>abc</sup> &#177; 1.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;14 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.77<sup>abc</sup> &#177; 0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;14 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.71<sup>abc</sup> &#177; 6.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;14 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.29<sup>bcd</sup> &#177; 1.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;14 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.49<sup>bcd</sup> &#177; 1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;14 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.71<sup>cd</sup> &#177; 1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;14 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.86<sup>d</sup> &#177; 4.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;14 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.86<sup>d</sup> &#177; 1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;14 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.86<sup>d</sup> &#177; 1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;14 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−ve</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means in the same column with different alphabet (s) are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) according to LSD.</p><p>isolates are able to overgrow PER71 with Bell’s Ranking at R1. Isolates M103 was determined as the fastest growing culture to overgrow PER71 after 9 days, compared to other isolates which only overgrow the pathogen at day 14 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). PER71 was also not able to grow on the inhibition zone of all tested Trichoderma isolates.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)</title><p>The mycoparasitism activity caused by isolate M103 on pathogenic PER71 was examined through Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), specifically on the inhibition zone. The pictograph shows the mycelia of M103 had grown and coiled the mycelia of PER71, eventually penetrating the hyphae and lysed them (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Production of Volatile Compound</title><p>Endophytic Trichoderma isolates that have recorded PIRG higher than 80% in dual culture assay were further tested for their ability to produce volatile compounds. A total of 9 isolates were determined producing volatile compounds, indicated by the successful suppression of G. boninense PER71 growth on plates. The PIRG recorded was in the range of 36.00% to 65.00% after seven days of incubation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The highest suppression was 65%, caused by the volatile compound produced by M103, while the lowest suppression was recorded from the volatile compound produced by M108, with PIRG of 36.00%. This study shows that the production of volatile compounds may be varied from the different isolates of endophytic Trichoderma which eventually produce different levels of suppression on PER71.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Production of Non-Volatile Compound</title><p>The antibiosis effect of non-volatile compounds secreted by the endophytic Trichoderma isolates against G. boninense PER71 were determined via cultures filtrated assay. The percentage of inhibition caused by the tested isolates was</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Antagonistic effect of endophytic Trichoderma against G. boninense PER71 through production of volatile compounds</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Isolates</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PIRG (%) &#177; SE (after 7 days)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.00<sup>a</sup> &#177; 1.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.90<sup>ab</sup> &#177; 1.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.68<sup>abc</sup> &#177; 2.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.90<sup>cb</sup> &#177; 1.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.00<sup>cd</sup> &#177; 1.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.70<sup>de</sup> &#177; 3.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.40<sup>de</sup> &#177; 1.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.60<sup>ef</sup> &#177; 1.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.00<sup>f</sup> &#177; 0.69</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means in the same column with different alphabet(s) are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) according to LSD.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of culture filtrated produced by endophytic Trichoderma isolates against G. boninense PER71 after 7 days of incubation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Isolates</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PIRG (%) &#177; SE (after 7 days)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.18<sup>a</sup> &#177; 1.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.36<sup>a</sup> &#177; 1.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.82<sup>b</sup> &#177; 2.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.18<sup>b</sup> &#177; 1.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.18<sup>c</sup> &#177; 1.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.99<sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETH11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.18<sup>c</sup> &#177; 1.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.09<sup>d</sup> &#177; 0.84</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means in the same column with different alphabet(s) are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) according to LSD.</p><p>from 16.09% to 98.18% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). In this assay, M108 has produced a toxic non-volatile compound, which caused 98.18% inhibition on PER71 on plates, which was the highest PIRG recorded compared to other isolates. Contrarily, M103 which was found to be the most outstanding isolate in previous dual culture assay and production of volatile compound experiments, has produced a non-volatile compound that only caused the lowest inhibition on PER71 (16.09%).</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Species Identification</title><p>The ITS sequence data of isolates M103 and M108 were compared with several possible homologous sequences from NCBI GenBank database (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Based on the sequence analysis, isolates M103 and M108 isolates were identified as</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Details on Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) sequence data used in this study</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Isolates</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Strain ID</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GenBank Accession Number</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. asperellum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KX146490</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. asperellum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BHU-BOT-RYRL16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KR856222</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. asperellum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TR-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KU203320</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. asperellum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H531</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KY978581</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. asperellum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >jz-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MG171157</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. asperellum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tr48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AJ230669</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. asperellum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MF363050</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. asperellum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KF723005</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. asperellum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T76-14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LC158827</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. viride</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CUMB VP-PN4-12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MT138567</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. viride</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LCM799.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MF495372</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. viride</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LESF115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KT278861</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. longibrachiatum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >QT22040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KY29918</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. longibrachiatum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FJ459963</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. longibrachiatum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >XZN209-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MF116270</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. longibrachiatum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34915eDRJ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MF782825</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. longibrachiatum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AB2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MF164178</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. harzianum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MH266422</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. harzianum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GMS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MH333257</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. harzianum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CKP01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KC330218</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. harzianum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cul-2018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MK673510</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. harzianum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AJ224006</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. harzianum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TRS65x</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KP009228</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. virens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GV29-8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >XM014094808</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. virens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GPRI-FUN34/YaaH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BK006704</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Trichoderma asperellum and T. harzianum at 99% similarity with NCBI Genbank accession number given in the phylogenetic studies of sequence analysis data. The generated neighbour joining based on the phylogenetic tree shows that endophytic Trichoderma are clustered together according to their species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Trichoderma sp. is commonly abundant in soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref18">18</xref>], rhizosphere of host plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref19">19</xref>] and recently detected as endophytes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref20">20</xref>]. In this study, a total of 14 endophytic Trichoderma isolates, isolated from healthy oil palm roots were assessed</p><p>for their potential as biological control agent (BCA) against G. boninense PER71. All the tested isolates have the ability to suppress more than 70% of PER71 mycelia in the dual culture assay. Trichoderma asperellum M103 was the most effective inhibitor in this assay. It has overgrown the mycelium of PER71 within only 9 days, compared to other isolates which took a total of 14 days to completely overgrown the pathogenic fungi. The results showed that T. asperellum M103 is an excellent competitor which successfully competes for space and nutrients due to its ability to grow faster than PER71. Similar findings have been reported, showing T. asperellum isolate which grows faster than G. boninense (UPM13) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref21">21</xref>] and F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref22">22</xref>]. Isolate PER71 was also not able to grow once the mycelia from the inhibition zone was subcultured onto a new PDA. This could be due to the presence of either antibiotic, metabolite compounds or lytic enzyme produced by T. asperellum M103 or mycoparasitic mechanism that occurred in the dual culture assay which contributed to the antagonistic effect against G. boninense [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref21">21</xref>]. The direct interaction between Trichoderma and pathogen in dual culture assay is called mycoparasitism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref12">12</xref>]. The interaction can be clearly observed through SEM specifically in the area of inhibition zone. The hyphae of T. asperellum M103 usually coil, penetrate the mycelium of PER71 and finally lysed them. The lysis occurs probably due to secretion of lysis enzymes or metabolites and these are the common process of mycoparasitim by Trichoderma sp. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref23">23</xref>].</p><p>The inhibitory effect of pathogenic Ganoderma PER71 in the presence of headspace gases on agar in the double plate method assay indicated the production of unidentified volatile substances by Trichoderma sp. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref12">12</xref>]. Volatile compounds that are produced by T. asperellum M103 had caused the highest suppression on the growth of PER71 compared to other tested isolates. The volatile compounds produced by different species of Trichoderma had impeded the hyphal growth of pathogen on agar plates depending on the species of Trichoderma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref24">24</xref>]. Trichoderma sp. have been shown to produce a broad array of volatile compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref25">25</xref>], containing antifungal properties such as alkyl pyrones produced by T. harzianum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref27">27</xref>] and 2-ethylhexanol, 1-nonanol, 6-PP, and 2-methyl-1-butanol by T. asperellum (T76-14) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref28">28</xref>].</p><p>Generally, isolates that caused the least inhibition on PER71 in both dual culture and double plate assays have exhibited excellent inhibition ability towards the pathogen through the culture filtrate method. Interestingly, this study discovered that T. harzianum M108 produced a toxic, non-volatile compound that is sufficient enough to almost totally suppress the growth of PER71 via the culture filtrate method. M108 recorded the highest PIRG value at 98.18%. On the other hand, T. asperellum M103 is suspected to produce less toxic, non-volatile compound as it only caused 16.09% inhibition on PER71 growth. However, the isolate has showed excellent inhibition performance on the pathogen in both dual culture assay and double plate methods. Cell free culture filtrate of Trichoderma which contains the non-volatile compounds has been used to demonstrate the possible antibiosis effect in biocontrol. For example, compound 6-pentyl-α-pyrone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref29">29</xref>], non-volatile compound produced by T. harzianum, is proven toxic to the grapevine trunk disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref30">30</xref>] and Fusarium wilt in cucumber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref31">31</xref>].</p><p>This trial generally discovered that different isolates of Trichoderma sp. may produce various amounts and toxicity of volatile and non-volatile compounds, as they have caused different levels of inhibition on the pathogen. Even though both isolates M103 and M108 have shown the potential ability to suppress the growth of PER71 in vitro, the results are still insufficient to declare that these isolates are suitable biological control agents to be used in the field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref33">33</xref>]. Therefore, it is important to conduct both in vitro and in vivo studies to gain comprehensive and conclusive results as screening tools for the selection of potential biocontrol agents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118934-ref32">32</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Trichoderma asperellum M103 and T. harzianum M108 were found to effectively inhibit the growth of G. boninense PER71 in vitro through a dual culture test with more than 85% PIRG and other different mechanisms involved. Based on the outstanding results, M103 and M108 would have huge potential as biocontrol agents (BCA) against G. boninense in oil palm. Besides the excellent efficacy, the endophytes characteristic of the isolates may be the ideal privilege for the BCA. The characteristic would shelter them from environmental changes and sustain their competency as BCA in the rhizosphere. Their presence in the roots of host plants also may aid in the prevention of soil-borne plant diseases as well as provids other advantages to the plants. In conclusion, combating PER71 with endophytic T. asperellum M103 and T. harzianum M108 could be the key to overcoming BSR disease in oil palm.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to thank the FGV R&amp;D SDN BHD for supporting this article.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Fishal, E.M.M., Razak, I.B.A., Bohari, N.H. and Nasir, M.A.A.M. (2022) In Vitro Screening of Endophytic Trichoderma sp. Isolated from Oil Palm in FGV Plantation against Ganodermaboninense. Advances in Microbiology, 12, 443-457. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2022.127031</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.118934-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murphy, D.J., Goggin, K. and Paterson, R.R.M. (2021) Oil Palm in the 2020s and Beyond: Challenges and Solutions. CABI Agriculture and Bioscience, 2, Article No. 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-021-00058-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dias, J.S. (2012) Major Classes of Phytonutriceuticals in Vegetables and Health Benefits: A Review. Journal of Nutritional Therapeutics, 1, 31-62. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5634.2012.01.01.5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Howell, C.R. (2003) Mechanisms Employed by Trichoderma Species in the Biological Control of Plant Diseases: The History and Evolution of Current Concepts. Plant Disease, 87, 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.1.4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Woo, S.L. and Lorito, M. (2007) Exploiting the Interaction between Fungal Antagonists, Pathogens and the Plant for Biocontrol. In: Novel Biotechnologies for Biocontrol Agent Enhancement and Management, Springer Press, Amsterdam, 107-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5799-1_6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, M.F., Li, G.H. and Zhang, K.Q. (2019) Non-Volatile Metabolites from Trichoderma spp. Metabolites, 9, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9030058</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Susanto, A., Sudharto, P.S. and Purba, R.Y. (2005) Enhancing Biological Control of Basal Stem Rot Disease (Ganoderma boninense) in Oil Palm Plantations. Mycopathologia, 159, 153-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-004-4438-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bailey, B.A., Bae, H., Strem, M.D., Roberts, D.P., Thomas, S.E., Samuels, G.J., Choi, I.-Y. and Holmes, K.A. (2006) Fungal and Plant Gene Expression during the Colonization of Cacao Seedlings by Endophytic Isolates of Four Trichoderma Species. Planta, 224, 1449-1464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-006-0314-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shamala</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>First Report: Isolation of Endophytic Trichoderma from Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) and Their in Vitro Antagonistic Assessment on Ganoderma boninense</article-title><source> Journal of Oil Palm Research</source><volume> 25</volume>,<fpage> 368</fpage>-<lpage>372</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martin, J.P. (1950) Use of Acid, Rose Bengal and Streptomycin in the Plate Method for Estimating Soil Fungi. Soil Science, 69, 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195003000-00006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schena, L., Nigro, F., Pentimone, I., Ligoria, A. and Ippolito, A. (2003) Control of Postharvest Rots of Sweet Cherries and Table Grapes with Endophytic Isolates of Aureobasidium pullulans. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 30, 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(03)00111-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morton, D.J. and Stroube, N.H. (1955) Antagonistic and Stimulating Effects of Soil Microorganism of Sclerotium rolfsii. Phytopathology, 45, 417-420.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siddiquee, S., Yusuf, U.K., Hossain, K. and Jahan, S. (2009) In Vitro Studies on the Potential Trichoderma harzianum for Antagonistic Properties against Ganoderma boninense. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 7, 970-976.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bell, D.K., Wells, H.D and Markham, C.R. (1982) In Vitro Antagonism of Trichoderma Species against Six Fungal Plant Pathogens. Phytopathology, 72, 379-382. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-72-379</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dennis, C. and Webster, J. (1971) Antagonistic Properties of Species Group of Trichoderma: I. Production of Non-Volatile Antibiotics. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 57, 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(71)80077-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W. and Lipman, D.J. (1990) Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 215, 403-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hall, B.G. (2013) Building Phylogenetic Trees from Molecular Data with MEGA. Molecular Biology Evolution, 30, 1229-1235. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vinale, F., Sivasithamparam, K., Ghisalberti, E.L., Marra, R., Woo, S.L. and Lorito, M. (2008) Trichoderma Plant Pathogen Interactions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.07.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harman, G.E., Howell, C.R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I. and Lorito, M. (2004) Trichoderma Species-Opportunistic, Avirulent Plant Symbionts. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro797</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haryadi, D., Sidhu, M.S., Panjaitan, T., Hendra, H. and Chong, K.P. (2019) The Potential of Endophytic Trichoderma from Oil Palm (Elaies guineensis Jacq.) Roots of North Sumatra, Indonesia against Ganoderma boninense. Journal Oil Palm Research, 31, 592-603. https://doi.org/10.21894/jopr.2019.0049</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Musa, H., Hassan, M.A., Isyaku, M.S., Halidu, J. and Suleiman, A. (2017) Antagonistic Potential of Trichoderma Species against Ganoderma Disease of Oil Palm. Nigerian Journal of Agriculture, Food and Environment, 13, 60-67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El_Komy, M.H., Saleh, A.A., Eranthodi, A. and Molan, Y.Y. (2015) Characterization of Novel Trichoderma asperellum Isolates to Select Effective Biocontrol Agents against Tomato Fusarium Wilt. The Plant Pathology Journal, 31, 50-60. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.09.2014.0087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steyaert, J.M., Ridgway, H.J., Elad, Y. and Stewart, A. (2003) Genetic Basis of Mycoparasitism: A Mechanism of Biological Control by Species of Trichoderma. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 31, 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2003.9514263</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doi, S. and Mori, M. (1994) Antifungal Properties of Metabolites Produced by Trichoderma Isolates from Sawdust Media of Edible Fungi against Wood Decay Fungi. Material Organismen, 28, 143-151.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asad, S.A., Ali, N., Hameed, A., Khan, S.A., Ahmad, R., Bilal, M., Shahzad, M. and Tabassum, A. (2014) Biocontrol Efficacy of Different Isolates of Trichoderma against Soil Borne Pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Polish Journal of Microbiology, 63, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2014-014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yassin, M.T., Mostafa, A.A.F., Al-Askar, A.A., Sayed, S.R. and Rady, A.M. (2021) Antagonistic Activity of Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma viride Strains against Some Fusarial Pathogens Causing Stalk Rot Disease of Maize, in Vitro. Journal of King Saud Universiti—Science, 33, Article ID: 101363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101363</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Claydon, N., Allan, M., Hanson, J.R. and Avent, A.G. (1987) Antifungal Alkyl Pyrones of Trichoderma harzianum. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 88, 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(87)80034-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Intana, W., Kheawleng, S. and Sunpapao, A. (2021) Trichoderma asperellum T76-14 Released Volatile Organic Compounds against Postharvest Fruit Rot in Muskmelons (Cucumis melo) Caused by Fusarium incarnatum. Journal of Fungi, 7, Article 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7010046</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, L.H., Niaz, S.I., Khan, D., Wang, Z., Zhu, Y., Zhou, H., Lin, Y., Li, J. and Liu, L. (2017) Induction of Diverse Bioactive Secondary Metabolites from the Mangrove Endophytic Fungus Trichoderma sp. (Strain 307) by Co-Cultivation with Acinetobacter johnsonii (Strain B2). Marine Drugs, 15, Article 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/md15020035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mutawila, C., Vinale, F., Halleen, F., Lorito, M. and Mostert, L. (2016) Isolation, Production and in Vitro Effects of the Major Secondary Metabolite Produced by Trichoderma Species Used for the Control of Grapevine Trunk Diseases. Plant Pathology, 65, 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12385</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, L.H., Cui, Y.Q., Yang, X.M., Zhao, D.K. and Shen, Q.R. (2012) An Antifungal Compound from Trichoderma harzianum SQR-T037 Effectively Controls Fusarium Wilt of Cucumber in Continuously Cropped Soil. Australasian Plant Pathology, 41, 239-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-012-0119-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martínez-Medina, A., Del Mar Alguacil, M., Pascual, J.A. and Van Wees, S. (2014) Phytohormone Profiles Induced by Trichoderma Isolates Correspond with Their Biocontrol and Plant Growth-Promoting Activity on Melon Plants. Molecular Plant Pathology, 40, 804-815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-014-0478-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118934-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saravanakumar, K., Yu, C., Dou, K., Wang, M., Li, Y. and Chen, J. (2016) Synergistic Effect of Trichoderma-Derived Antifungal Metabolites and Cell Wall Degrading Enzymes on Enhanced Biocontrol of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Cucumerinum. Biological Control, 94, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.12.001</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>