<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2022.137065</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-118675</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Fungitoxicity of &lt;i&gt;Trichoderma longibrachiatum&lt;/i&gt; (Rifai) Metabolites against &lt;i&gt;Fusarium oxysporum&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Aspergillus niger&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Aspergillus tamarii&lt;/i&gt;
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ayodele</surname><given-names>Adegboyega Sobowale</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Linda</surname><given-names>Chidinma Uzoma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adefoyeke</surname><given-names>Olufunmilayo Aduramigba-Modupe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bukola</surname><given-names>Ayodeji Bamkefa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Crop Protection and Environmental Biology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Botany, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Nigerian Institute of Science Laboratory Technology (NISLT), Ibadan, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Biological Sciences, Lead City University, Ibadan, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>07</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>984</fpage><lpage>993</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  An experiment was carried out to evaluate the fungitoxic effect of
   Trichoderma longibrachiatum (Rifai) 
  metabolite on
   F. oxysporum,
   A. niger and 
  A. tamarii. The fungi were collected from the International Institute of Tropical Agricult
  ure (IITA) and Nigerian Institute of Science Laboratory Technology (NISL
  T
  ). T. longibr
  achiatum
   was cultured on 
  1/4
   strength Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB) following standard procedures. Its metabolite was extracted using 50
   
  ml n-hexane 
  with 50
   
  ml Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB). The metabolite was purifi
  ed by filter sterilization using 
  a 
  sterile 0.22
   
  millipore filter disc after centrifuging at 900
   
  rpm for 20 m
  inutes. Petri plates of each fungus were later impregnated in triplicates with the T. longibrachiatum metabolites using four concentrations (10%, 25%, 50% and 100%), and three volumes (1
   
  ml, 2
   
  ml, and 3
   
  ml). Petri plates of fungi without the metabolite and Petri Plates of fungi with n-hexane and PDB served as control. All Petri Plates were incubated at 28
  &#176;C for 7 days. Radial and diametric growth of each fungus on all Petri Plates w
  ere
   taken daily at 24 hours interval
  s
  . Data obtained were analysed using SAS (version 9.3). Growth inhibition of F. oxysporum, A. niger and A. tamarii was significantly higher than in control in that order (P ≤ 0.05). Inhibition of the fungi by metabolites extracted with both PDB and n-hexane was significantly better than in control. Generally, inhibition by metabolite extracted with PDB was better than that extracted with n-hexane. Growth inhibition at all the concentrations of the metabolite was significantly better than in 
  the 
  control (P ≤ 0.05). Generally, inhibition at 100%, 50% and 25% concentrations was better than that at 10% concentration of the metabolite. Trichoderma longibrachiatum metabolite can thus be said to possess promising fungitoxic potential even at concentration
  s
   as low as 25%. Both PDB and n-hexane are good e
  xtraction media for the metabolite.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Antifungal Metabolites</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Trichoderma longibrachiatum</kwd><kwd> Fusarium oxysporum</kwd><kwd> Aspergillus niger</kwd><kwd> Aspergillus tamari&lt;/i&gt;</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>On a yearly basis, a huge percentage of economic plants are destroyed by plant pathogens. Pesticides and organic compounds are widely used to control plant pathogens in many countries. However, apart from the high cost, degradation of such compounds is very difficult and the concentration and/or accumulation of them in food chains continue to lead to higher toxicity levels in man and animals, as well as the environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref2">2</xref>]. There is therefore an increasing focus on alternate methods for the control of plant diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref4">4</xref>]. Fusarium oxysporum is a pathogen documented to be the cause of several diseases in different crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref6">6</xref>]. Aspergillus niger and A. tamarii are also known to be amongst the Aspergillus species causing common postharvest diseases in different plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref7">7</xref>]. Some strains of A. niger have been reported to produce potent mycotoxins called ochratoxins.</p><p>Trichoderma species are fungi that are present in nearly all soils and other diverse habitats. In soil, they frequently are the most prevalent culturable fungi. They are favoured by the presence of high levels of plant roots, which they colonize readily. Some strains are highly rhizosphere competent, i.e. able to colonize and grow on roots as they develop. In addition to colonizing roots, Trichoderma species attack, parasitize and otherwise gain nutrition from other fungi. They are known worldwide as biological agents used in protecting crops against plant pathogens under greenhouse and field conditions. Their mode of action against plant pathogens is known to include antibiosis, mycoparasitism, competition for space and nutrients etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref11">11</xref>]. They have been severally documented to suppress soil-borne pathogens like Macrophomina phaseolina, Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium species and Pythium species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>Trichoderma species are highly efficient producers of many extracellular enzymes. They are known to produce different volatile organic compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref17">17</xref>]. The metabolites secreted by them are as well known to be used as bio-fungicides to fight plant diseases caused by pathogenic fungi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref18">18</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref23">23</xref>]. The experiment was set up to investigate the fungitoxicity of Trichoderma longibrachiatum metabolite against the growth of Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus tamarii.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Collection of Fungal Isolates</title><p>Cultures of Trichoderma longibrachiatum, Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus tamarii were collected from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Extraction of Metabolites from T. longibrachiatum</title><p>The metabolite of T. longibrachiatum was extracted using n-hexane and 1/4 strength Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB). A 5 mm cork borer was used to cut 10 mycelia discs from 7-day old cultures of T. longibrachiatum. A modified method of Spiegel and Chet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref18">18</xref>] was used. T. longibrachiatum disc was transferred into each 250 ml flasks containing 100 ml of 1/4 strength of Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB), 50% n-hexane and 50% PDB. This was incubated and agitated on the horizontal shaker for 7 days at room temperature. After seven days of incubation and shaking, spores and mycelia of the fungi were removed from the broth culture of 1/4 strength Potato Dextrose Broth, 50% n-hexane and 50% PDB, by filtration using Whatman No. 1 filter paper. They were further purified by centrifuging at 9000 rpm for 20 mins and then filter sterilized using a sterile 0.22 millipore filter disc. The antimicrobial potential of the extracted metabolite was then tested against the three selected fungi at various concentrations of 10%, 25%, 50% and 100%.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Impregnating Test Plates with Trichoderma Metabolites and Data Collection</title><p>Acidified Potato Dextrose Agar (APDA) was prepared and dispensed into several Petri plates. Thereafter, 1 ml, 2 ml, and 3 ml of the metabolite were mixed separately with the Potato Dextrose Agar in the sterile plates by gently swirling plates to ensure homogeneity. The APDA plates with no metabolite served as a control. The plates were left to cool and gel, after which 5 mm fungal disc of each of the three pathogens was inoculated separately on the Agar plates under sterile conditions. The plates were incubated at 28˚C for 7 days and radial and diametric growth were measured daily. All experiments were done in triplicates.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Collection and Analysis</title><p>Percentage inhibition of pathogen was calculated by the following formula:</p><p>L = ( R 1 − R 2 ) / R 1 &#215; 100 ,</p><p>where:</p><p>L = Inhibition of mycelia growth;</p><p>R<sub>1</sub> = Growth measurement of the pathogen in control;</p><p>R<sub>2</sub> = Growth of the pathogen in the presence of Trichoderma longibrachiatum metabolite extract on daily basis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref24">24</xref>].</p><p>Results obtained were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the National Centre for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology (NACGRAB) using the Generalized Linear Model option of SAS (version 9.3).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the collapsed analysis of variance (ANOVA) table for inhibitory effect of T. longibrachiatum metabolite on the isolated pathogens. For Fusarium oxysporum, F-values for model, metabolite, concentration, days of incubation and volume of metabolite (P &gt; 0.0001) were all highly significant. F-values for the interaction between concentration and day (P &gt; 0.0001), metabolite and concentration (P &gt; 0.0001), concentration and volume (P &gt; 0.0001), metabolite and day (P &gt; 0.0001), volume and day (P &gt; 0.0001) as well as metabolite and volume (P &gt; 0.0219) were all highly significant. F-values for interaction among metabolite, concentration and day (P &gt; 0.0001), concentration, volume and day (P &gt; 0.0001), metabolite, concentration and volume (P &gt; 0.0001), metabolite, volume and day (P &gt; 0.0025) were all also highly significant. For Aspergillus niger, F-values for model, metabolite, concentration, days of incubation and volume</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> ANOVA table for effectiveness of T. longibrachiatum metabolite against growth of the isolated fungi Fusarium oxysporum</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fusarium oxysporum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus niger</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus tamarii</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Source</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P &gt; F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P &gt; F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P &gt; F</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Model</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Concentration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2145</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8814</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volume</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0236*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Concentration * Day</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1938</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolite * Concentration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9317</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Concentration * Volume</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0711</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolite * Day</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5326</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volume * Day</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7003</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolite * Volume</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0219*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7801</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolite * Conc. * Day</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4991</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Conc. * Volume * Day</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9990</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolite * Conc. * Vol.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9286</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolite * Volume * Day</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0025**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0002**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>* = Significant, ** = Highly Significant.</p><p>of metabolite (P &gt; 0.0001) were all highly significant. F-values for interaction between concentration and day, metabolite and concentration, concentration and volume, metabolite and day, volume and day, as well as metabolite and volume (P &gt; 0.0001) were highly significant. F-values for interaction among metabolite, concentration and day, concentration, volume and day, metabolite, concentration and volume (P &gt; 0.0001) as well as metabolite, volume and day (P &gt; 0.0002) were all highly significant. For Aspergillus tamarii,F-values for model and metabolite (P &gt; 0.0001) as well as volume of metabolite (P &gt; 0.0236) were all highly significant. F-value for interaction among metabolite, volume and day (P &gt; 0.0001) was also highly significant.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> gives the comparison of effectiveness of the metabolite of T. longibrachiatum at different concentrations against the growth of isolated pathogens. For F. oxysporum, growth inhibition of the pathogen at all the concentrations of the metabolite differed significantly from the control. Growth inhibition at 100% concentration was significantly higher than that at other concentrations. Growth inhibition at 25% concentration was also significantly higher than that at 50% concentration, which in turn, was significantly higher than that at 10% concentration (P = 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99). For A. niger,growth inhibition of the fungus at all the concentrations were significantly higher than control. However, growth inhibition at 10% concentration was significantly lower than that in other concentrations (P = 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99), which were not significantly different from themselves. For A. tamarii, growth inhibition of the fungus at all the concentrations was significantly higher than control. Growth inhibition at 25% concentration was significantly higher than that in other concentrations. Growth inhibition at 10% concentration was also significantly higher than that in 50% and 100% concentrations, while that at 50% concentration was as well significantly higher than that at 100% concentration (P = 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> compares the growth inhibition of the isolated fungi (Fusarium oxysporum,Aspergillus niger and A. tamarii,) by Trichoderma longibrachiatum metabolite among days of incubation. Growth inhibition at all days of incubation was significantly higher than control (P = 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effectiveness of Trichoderma longibrachiatum metabolite at different concentrations against growth of Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus niger and A. tamarii</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Concentration (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fusarium oxysporum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus niger</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus tamarii</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Means (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Means (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Means (cm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.833<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.467<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.490<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.570<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.033<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.717<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.121<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.715<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.596<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.245<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.844<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.942<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.020<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.769<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.490<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD<sub>0.05</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.435</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.989</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.991</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> compares effectiveness of T. longibrachiatum metabolite at different volumes on growth of the isolated fungi (F. oxysporum,Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus tamarii.). Growth inhibition of the three pathogens at the three different volumes was significantly higher than control. For F. oxysporum,growth inhibition at 3 ml of the metabolite was significantly higher than that at 2 ml, which in turn was as well significantly higher than that at 1ml of the metabolite. For Aspergillus niger,growth inhibition at 2 ml of the metabolite was significantly higher than that at 3 ml, which in turn was as well significantly higher than that at 1 ml of the metabolite (P = 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99). For Aspergillus tamarii, growth inhibition at 3 ml of the metabolite was also significantly higher than that at 2 ml, which in turn was significantly higher than that at 1 ml of the metabolite (P = 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> compares the growth inhibition of the three pathogens by metabolites of T. longibrachiatum extracted with different</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of growth inhibition of the isolated fungi by Trichoderma longibrachiatum metabolite among days of incubation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Days of Incubation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fusarium oxysporum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus niger</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus tamarii</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Means (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Means (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Means (cm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.833<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.467<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.490<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.759<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.200<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.761<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.711<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.122<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.755<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.526<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.021<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.541<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.172<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.860<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.524<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.690<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.291<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.193<sup>f</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.234<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.623<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.087<sup>g</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.523<sup>h</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.805<sup>h</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.490<sup>h</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD<sub>0.05</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.435</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.989</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.991</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means with different letters in a column are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Impact of volume of T. longibrachiatum metabolite on its effectiveness in inhibiting growth of the isolated fungi</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Volumes Used (ml)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fusarium oxysporum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus niger</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus tamarii</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Means (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Means (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Means (cm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.833<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.467<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.490<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.292<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.838<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.768<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.257<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.739<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.726<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.168<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.944<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.687<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD<sub>0.05</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.435</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.989</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.991</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means with different letters in a column are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Effectiveness of Trichoderma longibrachiatum metabolite extracted with different media against growth of the isolated fungi</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Extraction solvent</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fusarium oxysporum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus niger</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus tamarii</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Means (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Means (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Means (cm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.833<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.467<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.490<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N-hexane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.410<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.968<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.742<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PDB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.068<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.713<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.711<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD<sub>0.05</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.435</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.989</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.991</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means with different letters in a column are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).</p><p>solvents. Growth inhibition of the three pathogens by metabolites extracted with both solvents (n-hexane and PDB) was significantly higher than control. For both F.oxysporum and Aspergillus niger,growth inhibition by metabolite extracted with PDB was significantly higher than that extracted with n-hexane. However, growth inhibition of Aspergillus tamarii by metabolite extracted with n-hexane was also significantly higher than that by metabolite extracted with PDB (P = 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The significant F values for metabolite, days of incubation, concentration and volume of Trichoderma metabolite (P &gt; 0.0001) showed the effectiveness of the Trichoderma metabolite in inhibiting growth of the fungal pathogens compared to control. It showed that days of incubation as well as concentration and volume of the metabolite also played critical role in the effectiveness of the Trichoderma metabolite in its inhibitory potential. This is also corroborated by the highly significant F value (P &gt; 0.0001) for model, which showed the appropriateness of the fitted model (i.e. “goodness of fit”), where day of incubation, metabolite, concentration and volume of metabolite were all independent variables and growth inhibition of the fungal pathogens being the dependent variable. The significant F values for the interaction between metabolite and concentration (P &gt; 0.0001), interaction between metabolite and volume (P &gt; 0.0219) and also interaction between metabolite and days of incubation (P &gt; 0.0001) all show that the effectiveness of the T. longibrachiatum metabolite in growth inhibition of Fusarium oxysporum and Aspergillus niger differed significantly from one concentration to the other; and from one volume of metabolite to the other, and also from one day of incubation to the other (P = 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99). This, however, is not true of Aspergillus tamarii where interaction among most of the variables were not significant. This suggests that whereas the effectiveness of T. longibrachiatum metabolite against growth of Fusarium oxysporum and Aspergillus niger depends amongst others, on the interaction among the variables, the contrary is true for A. tamarii. It suggests that the effectiveness of T. longibrachiatum metabolite against A. tamarii does not depend on any interaction among the variables.</p><p>The results obtained with metabolite concentration strongly suggest that 100% concentration of the Trichoderma metabolite could be said to generally exhibit the most effective growth inhibition. Inhibition of the pathogens by the metabolite at 3 ml can also be said to be the most effective compared to the other volumes (P = 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99). The results obtained here support the suggestions of Luckner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref25">25</xref>] and Vicaino et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref26">26</xref>]. Rifai [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref12">12</xref>] also wrote extensively on the biocontrol potential of Trichoderma species. The results obtained with metabolites extracted with both solvents compared to control (P = 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99) showed the appropriateness of the two solvents (n-hexane and PDB) as extraction media for the Trichoderma metabolite. Both of them could thus be said to be good extraction solvents for T. longibrachiatum metabolite. The better result obtained with metabolite extracted with n-hexane might not be unconnected with its organic nature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref27">27</xref>]. Gams and Bissette [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref28">28</xref>] reported the degree to which Trichodermaspecies suppressed the growth of peanut moulds such as Fusarium species,A. niger,A. flavus,A. parasiticus andA. ochraceous might involve the production of volatiles and/or production of extracellular enzymes. Volatiles from Trichoderma species have been reported to be able to arrest the hyphal growth of different fungal pathogens on agar plates. Most strains of Trichoderma are reported to possess the potential to produce volatiles and non-volatile toxic metabolites such as harzianic acid, alamethicins and tricholin that hinder growth of other microorganisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118675-ref29">29</xref>]. Some aggressive Trichoderma spp. used as biocontrol agents are also known to be capable of producing either antibiotics or extracellular enzymes or both.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Conclusively, the metabolite of Trichoderma longibrachiatum could be said to possess promising antagonistic potential against Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus niger and A. tamarii in that order. Generally, the effectiveness of the metabolite is better at 100% and 50% concentrations and at a volume of 3 ml. Both PDB and n-hexane are good extraction solvents for Trichoderma longibrachiatum metabolite. Further studies are however necessary to ascertain its effectiveness in vivo over a long duration.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sobowale, A.A., Uzoma, L.C., Aduramigba-Modupe, A.O. and Bamkefa, B.A. (2022) Fungitoxicity of Trichoderma longibrachiatum (Rifai) Metabolites against Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus tamarii. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 13, 984-993. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2022.137065</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.118675-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Daniel, J.F. and Filho, E.R. (2007) Peptaibols of Trichoderma. Natural Products Reports, 24, 1128-1141. https://doi.org/10.1039/b618086h</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tang, F.H.M., Lenzen, M., McBratney, A. and Maggi, F. (2021) Risk of Pesticide Pollution at the Global Scale. Nature Geoscience, 14, 206-210.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00712-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Inbar, J., Abramsky, M. and Cohen, D. (1994) Plant Growth Enhancement and Disease Control by Trichoderma harzianum in Vegetable Seedlings Grown under Commercial Conditions. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 100, 337-346.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01876444</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harman, G.E. (2000) Myths and Dogmas of Biocontrol. Changes in Perceptions Derived from Research on Trichoderma harzianum T-22. Plant Diseases, 84, 377-393.  
https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.4.377</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Chet, I., Inbar, J. and Hadar, I. (1997) Fungal Antagonists and Mycoparasites. In: Wicklow, D.T. and S&amp;#246;derstr&amp;#246;m, B., Eds., The Environmental and Microbial Relationships, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 165-184.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trivedi, P., Leach, J.E., Tringe, S.G., Sa, T. and Singh, B.K. (2020) Plant-Microbiome Interactions: From Community Assembly to Plant Health. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 18, 607-621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Park, M.S., Bae, K.S. and Yu, S.H. (2006) Two New Species of Trichoderma Associated with Green Mold of Oyster Mushroom Cultivation in Korea. Mycobiology, 34, 111-113.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Howell, C.R. (1998) The Role of Antibiosis in Biocontrol. In G. E. Harman &amp; C. P. Kubicek, Trichoderma &amp; Gliocladium, Vol. 2, Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd., London, 173-184.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Howell, C.R. (2003) Mechanisms Employed by Trichoderma Species in the Biological Control of Plant Diseases: The History and Evolution of Current Concepts. Plant Disease, 87, 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.1.4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harman, G.E. (2006) Overview of Mechanisms and Uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology, 96, 190-194. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-96-0190</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tian, L., Lin, X., Tian, J., Ji, L., Chen, Y. and Tran, L.S. (2020) Research Advances of Beneficial Microbiota Associated with Crop Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, Article No. 1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051792</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rifai</surname><given-names> M.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1969</year>)<article-title>A Revision of the Genus Trichoderma</article-title><source> Mycological Papers</source><volume> 116</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>56</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eziashi, E.I., Uma, N.U., Adekunle, A.A. and Airede, C.E. (2006) Effect of Metabolites Produced by Trichoderma species against Ceratocystis paradoxa in Culture Medium. Biotechnology, 5, 703-704.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samuels, G.J. (2006) Trichoderma: Systematics, the Sexual State, and Ecology. Phytopathology, 96, 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-96-0195</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oda, S., Isshiki, K. and Ohashi, S. (2009) Production of 6-Pentyl-[Alpha]-Pyrone with Trichoderma atroviride and Its Mutant in a Novel Extractive Liquid-Surface Immobilization (Ext-LSI) System. Process Biochemistry, 44, 625-630.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2009.01.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stoppacher, N., Kluger, B., Zeilinger, S., Krska, R. and Schuhmacher, R. (2010) Identification and Profiling of Volatile Metabolites of the Biocontrol Fungus Trichoderma atroviride by HS-SPME-GC-MS. Microbiological Methods, 81, 187-193.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2010.03.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, K., Wu, Y., Hu, J., Wei, Y., Li, J., Yang, H., Ryder, M. and Denton, M.D. (2020) Near-Complete Genomes of Two Trichoderma Species: A Resource for Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions, 33, 1036-1039. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-03-20-0076-A</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spiegel, Y. and Chet, I. (1998) Evaluation of Trichoderma spp. as a Biocontrol Agent against Soilborne Fungi and Plant-Parasitic Nematodes in Israel. Integrated Pest Management Review, 3,169-175. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009625831128</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vinale, F., Sivasithamparam, K., Ghisalberti, E.L., Marra, R., Woo, S.L. and Lorito, M. (2008) Trichoderma-Plant-Pathogen Interactions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.07.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, Q., Sun, R., Ni, M., Yu, J., Li, Y., Yu, C., Dou, K., Ren, J. and Chen, J. (2017) Identification of a Novel Fungus, Trichoderma asperellum GDFS1009, and Comprehensive Evaluation of Its Biocontrol Efficacy. PLOS ONE, 12, e0179957.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179957</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Su, D., Ding, L. and He, S. (2018) Marine-Derived Trichoderma Species as a Promising Source of Bioactive Secondary Metabolites. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, 18, 1702-1713. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557518666180727130826</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, S., Kour, D., Rana, K.L., Dhiman, A., Thakur, S., Thakur, P., Thakur, S., Thakur, N., Sudheer, S., Yadav, N., Yaday, A.N., Rastegari, A.A. and Singh, K. (2019) Trichoderma: Biodiversity, Ecological Significances, and Industrial Applications. In: Yadav, A.N., Mishra, S., Singh, S. and Gupta, A., Eds., Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology through Fungi, Springer, Cham, 85-120.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10480-1_3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ruangwong, O.U., Pornsuriya, C., Pitija, K. and Sunpapao, A. (2021) Biocontrol Mechanisms of Trichoderma koningiopsis PSU3-2 against Postharvest Anthracnose of Chili Pepper. Journal of Fungi, 7, Article No. 276.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7040276</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sobowale, A.A., Oludare, A.A., Amusa, N.A. and Oguntade, O. (2015) Mycoparasitic Capability of Trichoderma asperellum and Its Metabolite. Nigerian Journal of Mycology, 7, 125-140.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luckner, M. (1990) Secondary Metabolism in Microorganisms, Plants and Animals. 3rd Edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vicaino, J.A., Sanz, L., Basilio, A., Vincete, F., Gutierrez S Hermosa, M.R. and Monte, E. (2005) Screening of Antimicrobial Activities in Trichoderma Isolates Representing Three Trichoderma Sections. Mycological Research, 109, 1397-1314.  
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756205003898</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kubicek, C.P., Mach, R.L., Peterbauer, C.K. and Lorito, M. (2001) Trichoderma: From Genes to Biocontrol. Journal of Plant Pathology, 83, 11-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Gams, W. and Bissett, J. (2002) Morphology and Identification of Trichoderma. In: Kubicek, C.P. and Harman, G.E., Eds., Trichoderma and Gliocladium: Basic Biology, Taxonomy and Genetics, Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd., London, 3-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118675-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benitez, T., Rincon, A.M., Limon, M.C. and Codon, A.C. (2004) Biocontrol Mechanisms of Trichoderma Strains. International Microbiology, 7, 249-260.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>