<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">YM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Yangtze Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2475-7330</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ym.2021.63005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">YM-118588</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Study of Nurse’s Work Alienation and Its Influence on Turnover Intention
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jingjing</surname><given-names>Zhao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yiqing</surname><given-names>He</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jing</surname><given-names>Xu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sanxia</surname><given-names>Hu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Wuhan Institute of Design and Sciences, Wuhan, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>07</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>57</fpage><lpage>65</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>30,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Nurse turnover is a significant cause of human resource shortage, which not only increases the workload of existing nurses, reduces job satisfaction, but also affects the quality of care. Therefore, maintaining the stability of nursing human resources becomes a great concern. 
  Objective: To understand the current status of nurse work alienation and turnover intention and its correlationship. 
  Methods: By convenience sampling, from May to August 2021, 1112 cases were selected and investigated from three hospitals in Wuhan by using general demographic scale, the work alienation scale and turnover intention scale. 
  Results: The average score of nurse’s work alienation was (30.32 &#177; 9.84); turnover intention score was (14.83 &#177; 3.99). The dimensions of work alienation were positively correlated with turnover intention (P &lt; 0.05). 
  Conclusion: Nurse’s work alienation and turnover intention are in the moderate level. It is recommended that manager should focus on the nurse’s mental environments, and take active and effective measures to reduce the level of nurse’s work alienation, improving the job satisfaction of nurse and the quality of nursing work.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Nurse</kwd><kwd> Work Alienation</kwd><kwd> Turnover Intention</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>As an important force in realizing the “Health China 2030” strategy, the quantity and quality of nurses are directly related to the supply and quality of medical and health services [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref1">1</xref>]. In order to meet the overall needs of the development of national health, meet the people’s diversified and multi-level nursing needs, strengthen the nursing workforce construction work, enhance the sense of professional honor and mobilize nurses’ enthusiasm is the basic work for the development of health care in China [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref2">2</xref>]. But in any industry, there are separation phenomena and will change with the society changes. Nurses are one of the high turnover groups in the health care industry. The human resource crisis in nursing is also faced by all countries today [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Work alienation is a workplace phenomenon of negative work attitudes, understood as a separation or disconnection from work caused by the needs or expectations of employees, emphasizing the relationship between work and work environment, that is, a person’s psychological alienation in the environment will not be able to establish an emotional relationship with the organization, resulting in a low-level contact between employees and work, manifested as a sense of helpless, helplessness and meaningless feeling and other psychological and behavioral [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref4">4</xref>]. If they are not accommodated in a timely manner, they may lead to a propensity to leave or even develop into separation behavior [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref5">5</xref>]. Turnover intention is the likelihood that an individual will change his or her job within a certain period of time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref6">6</xref>], and it is an antecedent variable of turnover behavior, which has good predictive power for actual turnover behavior, which can reduce the quality of care and increase labor costs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref7">7</xref>]. This study aims to provide theoretical references for nursing managers to effectively reduce nurses’ willingness to leave and stabilize the nursing workforce through the investigation and analysis of clinical nurses’ work alienation and turnover intentions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Participants</title><p>From May to August 2021, the hospitals ranged in size from 400 beds to 1200 beds and were run by a non-profit organization affiliated with the Wuhan province. All nurses including the department of internal medicine, surgery, emergency medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics and intensive care units who were currently full-time employees in the study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Instruments</title><p>The general socio-demographic information questionnaire of the study subjects was designed by the researcher, which included the gender, age, working hours, nature of employment, education, title, position, and marital status of the study subjects.</p><p>The work alienation of the nurse’s questionnaire developed by Xiaojing Ren [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref8">8</xref>] was used, including three dimensions of helplessness feeling, helpless feeling, and meaninglessness feeling, with four items per dimension, for a total of 12 items. Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5 on a scale from “not conform” to “very conform”, with higher scores indicating a stronger sense of alienation among nurses. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.89.</p><p>Micheal and Spector [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref9">9</xref>] developed the turnover intention of the nurse’s Scale in 1982, which was translated and revised by Jingyuan Li et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref10">10</xref>]. The scale contains three dimensions (six items), namely, the likelihood of quitting the current job, the motivation to find another job, and the likelihood of obtaining an outside job. The Likert 4-point scale was used, with “never” scoring 1, “rarely” scoring 2, “occasionally” scoring 3, and “often” scoring 4. The higher the score, the stronger the intention to leave. The overall Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale in this study was 0.830, and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of each dimension were 0.719, 0.762, and 0.787, respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Methods</title><p>Using a convenience sampling method, potential participants’ names and units were obtained from personnel departments at the three hospitals which the school has a relationship. Individual departments at each hospital, including nursing and other departments, were contacted to schedule dates for administering the survey. The questionnaires were then distributed to participants with a cover page explaining the purposes and procedures of this study. All questionnaires were then collected by the researcher or were returned with the consent form in the addressed envelope provided or in mailboxes at the hospitals.</p><p>A total of 1200 questionnaires were distributed in this study, 1180 were collected, 1112 were valid, and the effective recovery rate was 93%.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Analysis</title><p>An Excel database was established and SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical analysis, with double entry and checking of the data to ensure the correctness of the data. General socio-demographic data, work alienation and scores of each dimension, willingness to leave and scores of each dimension of clinical nurses were statistically described using, composition ratios; two independent samples t-test or ANOVA was applied for one-way analysis of work alienation; Pearson correlation analysis was applied for correlation between turnover intention and work alienation; with the level of statistical significance set at P = 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Participant Demographics</title><p>Among the 1112 subjects included in the study, 30 (2.7%) were male and 1082 (97.3%) were female; age ranged from 20 to 52 years, with a mean age of (31.05 &#177; 6.33) years; initial education: 902 (81.1%) were specialists, 300 (18.9%) were bachelor’s degree and above; highest education: 569 (51.1%) were specialists, 546 (48.8%) were bachelor’s degree and above; marital status: 711 (63.9%) were unmarried, 375 (33.7%) were married, and 26 (2.3%) were others; job establishment: 329 (29.7%) were formally on the staff. 546 (48.8%); marital status: 711 (63.9%) unmarried, 375 (33.7%) married, 26 (2.3%) other; job establishment: 329 (29.6%) formally on staff, 783 (70.4%) personnel agency or contract system, the rest see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Participant demographics (N = 1113)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >work alienation of the nurse’s ( X &#175; &#177; s )</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >t/F</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Departments</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.292</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Emergency Medicine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.93 &#177; 9.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Internal Medicine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >386</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.56 &#177; 9.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >297</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.51 &#177; 9.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.86 &#177; 9.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICU</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.95 &#177; 8.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.32 &#177; 9.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Title</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.327</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.019</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nurse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.33 &#177; 9.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nurse practitioner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >552</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.15 &#177; 9.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Supervisor nurse practitioner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.24 &#177; 9.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Deputy chief nursing officer and above</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.97 &#177; 10.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Position</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.556</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.033</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Staff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.49 &#177; 9.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Manager</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.05 &#177; 9.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.777</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.040</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000 - 3000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.95 &#177; 10.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3000 - 5000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >387</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.46 &#177; 10.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5000 - 7000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >483</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.80 &#177; 9.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;7000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.45 &#177; 9.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Years of nursing experience</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.686</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.045</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.37 &#177; 9.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >263</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.56 &#177; 9.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >351</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.81 &#177; 9.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >392</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.92 &#177; 10.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. The Work Alienation of the Nurse’s Score</title><p>The total score of work alienation among nurses was (30.32 &#177; 9.84) and the scores of each dimension were: helplessness feeling (11.81 &#177; 3.83), helpless feeling (9.04 &#177; 3.62) and meaninglessness feeling (9.46 &#177; 3.82).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. The Turnover Intention of the Nurse’s Score</title><p>The total score of nurses’ turnover intention was (14.83 &#177; 3.99) and the scores of each dimension were: value conflict dimension (4.80 &#177; 1.70), individual responsibility dimension (4.57 &#177; 1.73) and failure to maintain the best interests of patients (5.46 &#177; 1.33).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Comparison of Work Alienation among Nurses with Different Demographic Characteristics</title><p>The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference (P &lt; 0.05) in the total work alienation score of nurses comparing the scores of different positions, titles, salaries, departments, and years of work, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Correlation Analysis of Work Alienation and Turnover Intention of Nurses</title><p>Pearson correlation analysis showed that the total nurse’s work alienation score was positively correlated with the total turnover intention score and its dimensions, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The results of this study showed that nurses’ work alienation score was 30.18 &#177; 9.24, which was at a medium level and was basically consistent with the findings of Xiaohe Chen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref11">11</xref>], and the scores of each dimension were, in descending order, meaninglessness feeling, helplessness feeling, and helpless feeling. In a study by Tong Zhong et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref12">12</xref>], it was shown that nurses’ sense of work alienation leads to silent behavior, which affects organizational effectiveness, hinders organizational innovation, reduces employee satisfaction, generates job burnout, and is detrimental to the development of nurses themselves and the organization. In addition, in a survey of 287 emergency department nurses by Qiongjie Zhang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref13">13</xref>], it was shown that quality of life of emergency nurses was negatively correlated with work alienation. Nowadays, with the fierce competition in nursing work, the constant updating of professional knowledge, the complexity of work appraisal mechanism and the increasingly severe nurse-patient relationship [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref14">14</xref>], coupled with the special characteristics of hospital work environment and service recipients, the work pressure faced by nurses is constantly increasing, and when the welfare and salary are often unsatisfactory, they are unable to realize the improvement of self-worth in their work, which is very easy to generate burnout and create a sense of work alienation. It is known that nurses are the key to patients’ recovery.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation between work alienation and turnover intention of nurses (r value)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Feeling of helplessness</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Feeling of helpless</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Feeling of meaninglessness</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total score of WORK alienation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possibility of quitting your current job</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.342**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.277**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.452**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.410**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Possibility of finding another job</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.284**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.248**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.361**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.342**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Likelihood of getting another job</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.107**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.068*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.082**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.098**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total score of intention to leave</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.304**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.248**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.376**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.356**</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**P &lt; 0.01 *P &lt; 0.05.</p><p>It is known that nurses are one of the important determinants of patients’ recovery, and the psychological environment of nurses plays a vital role in patients’ recovery. If nurses show sincere feelings and optimism in the nursing process, patients can also gain more confidence and positive attributions in the recovery process. Therefore, reducing nurses’ work alienation is a proven measure for both the establishment of a good doctor-patient relationship and the improvement of the medical environment.</p><p>This study showed that nurses’ intention to leave their jobs scored (14.83 &#177; 3.99), which is basically consistent with the findings of Duan Yinglong [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref15">15</xref>], where the highest scoring dimension was the possibility of obtaining another job and the lowest scoring dimension was the possibility of finding a job of another department. The results suggest that the study subjects have a strong initiative and advantage in employment and career selection, with the expansion of nurses’ scope of practice and increased flexibility in career selection, and the current medical environment, where there is a general shortage of nurses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref16">16</xref>], the study subjects work in tertiary general class A hospitals, where nurses have higher professional quality and business ability, and nurses have increased opportunities to choose different forms of hospitals, such as community nursing, hospice care, family wards, etc., but on the other hand, due to the technical, knowledgeable, and professional nature of nursing work and the nursing education received over the years, many nurses do not completely abandon the nursing profession even if they have the will to leave [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref5">5</xref>]. This also gives nursing managers a hint to improve nurses’ work mechanism and help nurses realize their own value by guiding them to make scientific career planning in order to minimize their willingness to leave.</p><p>The results of this study indicate that nurses’ work alienation has a positive effect on their willingness to leave, which is consistent with the results of a related study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref8">8</xref>], suggesting that the higher the nurses’ work alienation, the stronger their willingness to leave accordingly. Affective event theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref17">17</xref>] suggests that employees are affected by work events that affect their emotions and cause them to have positive or negative emotions, which in turn affect their behavior. Specifically, nurses’ perceived job loss, job performance, salary advancement, excessive competition and interpersonal disturbances all affect their emotions and mood changes, which affect their quality of work life and make their quality of work life lower, which in turn affects nurses’ willingness to leave their jobs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref18">18</xref>]. In other words, the stronger the sense of work alienation felt by nurses, the lower their quality of work life will be, which will further intensify nurses’ willingness to leave. Once turnover behavior occurs, it will not only cause the situation of nursing manpower shortage in hospitals to further deteriorate, but will also have a series of potential negative effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118588-ref19">19</xref>]. Therefore, it is necessary to take targeted measures to reduce nurses’ sense of work alienation, reduce turnover behavior, prevent a series of problems caused by nursing human resource shortage, stabilize the nursing team, and improve the quality of nursing services.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In summary, managers can improve nursing staff’s recognition of the work they do and alleviate negative psychological experiences in order to enhance nursing staff motivation and satisfaction and improve job performance. This study shows that nurses’ work alienation is at a moderate level and work alienation has a positive relationship with willingness to leave. Therefore, it is necessary for managers to pay attention to nurses’ psychological experience, reduce their sense of work alienation, improve nurses’ job satisfaction, stabilize the development of the nursing team, reduce their willingness to leave, and improve the quality of nursing services.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Limitations of the Study</title><p>This study only investigated the current situation of turnover intention and work alienation of clinical nurses in the tertiary hospitals in Wuhan region, and did not investigate other regions, sub-hospitals, and other health care providers due to the limitation of human and material resources, suggesting that future studies could investigate other health care institutions such as nursing homes and community health centers.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Zhao, J.J., He, Y.Q., Xu, J. and Hu, S.X. (2022) The Study of Nurse’s Work Alienation and Its Influence on Turnover Intention. Yangtze Medicine, 6, 57-65. https://doi.org/10.4236/ym.2022.63005</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Part 1. The Work Alienation of the Nurse’s Scale</title><p>Please rate how well the following statements match your real-life work and tick the one that best matches your situation.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Part 2. The Turnover Intention of the Nurse’s Scale</title><p>From the situations described by the individuals below, check the one that best fits your current situation and feelings.</p><p>1) Are you considering quitting your current job?</p><p>A. Often B. Occasionally C. Rarely D. Never</p><p>2) Do you want to find other jobs of the same nature?</p><p>A. Often B. Occasionally C. Rarely D. Never</p><p>3) Do you want to find other jobs of different nature?</p><p>A. Often B. Occasionally C. Rarely D. Never</p><p>4) Given your current situation and conditions, how likely do you think you are to find a suitable position in another organization?</p><p>A. very likely B. likely C. unlikely D. highly unlikely</p><p>5) If you know there is a suitable job vacancy for you in another organization now, how likely are you to get the job?</p><p>A. very likely B. likely C. unlikely D. highly unlikely</p><p>6) Will you quit your current job?</p><p>A. definitely will B. probably will C. probably won’t D. definitely won’t</p><p>Please check if there are any missing items, this questionnaire ends here, thank you for your sincere help!</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.118588-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, K., Shu, Z.Q., Jing, L.M., et al. (2020) The Willingness of Community Health Center Nurses to Leave Their Jobs under the Incentive Policy. China Health Resources, 23, 421-426.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Health and Wellness Commission (2021) Vigorously Strengthen Nurses Team Construction to Promote High-Quality Development of Nursing Work. National Health and Wellness Commission, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Willis, W., Cox, P. and Coustasse-Hencke, A. (2014) The American Epidemic: The U.S. Nursing Shortage and Turnover Problem. Business and Health Administration Association (BHAA), Chicago, 1-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirschfeld, R.R. and Field, H.S. (2000) Work Centrality and Work Alienation: Distinct Aspects of a General Commitment to Work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 789-800. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1379(200011)21:7%3C789::AID-JOB59%3E3.0.CO;2-W</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, L. and Wan, Q. (2016) The Current Situation of ICU Nursing Work Environment and Its Influence on Willingness to Leave. China Nursing Management, 2, 220-223.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Gieter, S., Hofmans, J. and Pepermans, R. (2011) Revisiting the Impact of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment on Nurse Turnover Intention: An Individual Differences Analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48, 1562-1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.06.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hayes, L.J., O’Brien-Pallas, L., Duffield, C., et al. (2012) Nurse Turnover: A Literature Review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49, 887-905. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.1.53</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ren, X. (2012) Content Structure and Related Research of Nurses’ Work Alienation. Henan University, Zhengzhou.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Michaels, C.E. and Spector, P.E. (1982) Causes of Employee Turnover: A Test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, and Meglino Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.1.53</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, D. and Li, J. (2000) A Study on the Correlation between Role Conflict, Organizational Commitment, and Turnover Intention under Matrix Organizational Structure. Institute of Management Science, Chiao Tung University, Taipei.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, X., Yao, M., et al. (2017) The Influence of Social Capital and Sense of Professional Benefit on Nurses’ Job Alienation. Chinese General Medicine, 15, 693-696.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhong, T., Chen, Q., et al. (2016) Research on Relationships between Nurses’ Silence Behavior and Work Alienation, Organizational Climate. China Nursing Management, 16, 472-476.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, J., Xia, W., Li, X., et al. (2016) The Impact of Job Alienation on Quality of Life of Emergency Department Nurses. Hospital Management Forum, 33, 56-59.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Y. (2013) Study on the Relationship between Nurses’ Psychological Capital, Organizational Commitment and Job Burnout. Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duan, Y., Wu, X., Zhong, Z., et al. (2017) A Study on the Influence of Nurses’ Professional Identity and Burnout on Willingness to Leave. China Nursing Management, 17, 368-373.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, H. and Li, G. (2017) Research Progress on Factors Influencing Nurses’ Willingness to Leave and Interventions. Journal of Nursing, 32, 106-108.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duan, J., Fu, Q., et al. (2011) Content, Application and Research Outlook of Affective Event Theory. Advances in Psychological Science, 19, 599-607.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, N., Wu, X., Jiao, J., et al. (2018) Retrospective Analysis of Factors Associated with Nurse Turnover. Nursing Research, 32, 492-494.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118588-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, T. and Li, G. (2018) Research Progress of Nursing Human Resource Attrition Interventions. Journal of Nursing, 33, 107-110.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>