<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Geology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7570</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojg.2022.126024</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJG-118277</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Geochemistry of Mafic Rocks from the Birimian Basement of Doropo (Northeast of C&#244;te d’Ivoire): Petrogenetic and Geodynamic Implications
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wilfried</surname><given-names>Digbeu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alain</surname><given-names>Nicaise Kouamelan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Asinne</surname><given-names>Tshibubudze</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ziandjêdé</surname><given-names>Hervé Siagne</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fossou</surname><given-names>Jean-Luc Hervé Kouadio</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Council for Geosciences, Pretoria, South Africa</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Géologie, Ressources Minérales et Energétiques, Université Félix Houphou&amp;amp;#235;t-Boigny, Abidjan-Cocody, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>06</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>504</fpage><lpage>520</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The northeastern region of C
  &amp;#244;te d’Ivoire is characterised by a granitic basement mainly composed of biotite granite rocks. According to mapping work in the Gbab&#233;djou and Doropo areas, these Birimian granitoids are cut by gabbro dykes and amphibolite enclaves, which are the subject of this study. In order to better understand the role and the implication of mafic rocks in the Doropo basement emplacement, a multidisciplinary methodology integrating microscopic observations and geochemical analyses of major and trace elements was carried out on 4 samples considered representative of the outcrops studied. Green hornblende, clinopyroxene, and accessory sphene minerals are found in mafic mineral phases, according to petrographic research. Whole-rock analyses reveal that mafic samples with TiO
  <sub>2</sub> contents &lt; 2% are poor in Ti and have both calc-alkaline and tholeiitic rock affinities. They are metaluminous with A/CNK &gt; 1.1 ratios giving them an orogenic granite nature (I-type). Their REE patterns are moderately fractionated (La/Sm)
  <sub>N</sub> = 2.66 - 6.13 and (La/Yb)
  <sub>N</sub> = 11.17 - 43.70) with a very negative Eu anomaly (Eu/Eu* = 0.75 - 0.97). The multi-element diagrams are characterized by negative Nb-Ta anomalies and geotectonic studies have identified them as volcanic arc formations. All these characteristics allowed us to distinguish the Doropo mafic rocks as formations originating from the juvenile continental crust, emplaced under the Archean tectonics model with significant crustal contamination in the source. Magma driven by mantle diapir has been injected at the base of the continental crust and the heat induces the partial melting of the overlying crust giving rise to mixed liquids. This magma now enriched in LILE was immediately drained to the upper crust to form the mafic rocks from the studied area.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Doropo</kwd><kwd> Mafic Intrusive</kwd><kwd> Birimian</kwd><kwd> Crustal Contamination</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The Paleoproterozoic terrane of the Man-Leo Rise is described as greenstone belt assemblages associated with several generations of granitoid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref3">3</xref>]. The study of the geodynamic setting of these Birimian-aged rocks has given rise to different opinions that can be summarized in two main tectonic assumptions. Indeed, some authors believe that the juvenile Birimian crust was produced in subduction-related environments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref7">7</xref>], while another school of thought suggests that it was generated by magmatism related to mantle plume [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref9">9</xref>]. In order to provide arguments on the controversy related to the geodynamic evolution and growth of the Birimian continental crust, the mafic intrusives from the Gbab&#233;djou and Doropo localities in northeastern C&#244;te d’Ivoire were analyzed. This choice is based on the work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref10">10</xref>] who showed that to fully understand the evolution and overall tectonic setting of the Birimian rocks, particular attention should be paid to the mafic and ultramafic plutonic complexes and their associated intrusives. The objective of this paper is to characterize the gabbroic rocks of the Doropo region, using their major and trace element data. In other words, by integrating field work, petrography and whole-rock geochemistry, the study attempts to reveal the petrogenetic characteristics and implications of the mafic enclaves and dykes in the structuration of the Doropo Birimian basement.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Geological Setting</title><p>The Man-Leo Rise represents the Precambrian formations outcropping in the southern part of the West African Craton as two main domains (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The Kenema-Man core consists mainly of Archean terrains, ranging in age from ~3.4 to 2.7 Ga, outcropping in western C&#244;te d’Ivoire [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref12">12</xref>], Guinea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref14">14</xref>], Sierra Leone and Liberia. In C&#244;te d’Ivoire, this core is characterized by geological formations of the high degree of metamorphism such as grey granulite gneiss, charnockites, ultramafic rocks and granites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref16">16</xref>]. Separated from the Archean K&#233;n&#233;ma-Man domain by the Sassandra fault, the Baoul&#233;-Mossi domain refers to the “Birimian” formations that occupy the eastern part of the rise. These terrains are consisting of belts of metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks intruded by different generations of granitoids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref17">17</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref22">22</xref>]. Whole rock geochemistry revealed that these different belts contain two main volcanic families. A tholeiitic mafic volcanic series at the base that is overlain by intermediate</p><p>acidic volcanic series of a calc-alkaline composition. Even with little scientific work the Doropo region, its geological setting can be apprehended, using the numerous studies completed in the adjacent localities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref23">23</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref28">28</xref>].</p><p>Structural studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref1">1</xref>] in the south of Burkina-Faso show that the Paleoproterozoic domain is composed of two greenstone belts oriented N-S, respectively, known as, from east to west: 1) Boromo Belt whose continuity in Ghana gives the Lawra Belt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref3">3</xref>] and 2) Hound&#233; Belt, which extends into C&#244;te d’Ivoire as the T&#233;hini Belt.</p><p>Work in north-eastern Ghana has shown that late Birimian basins filled with fine-grained sedimentary also occur in these belts. A sedimentary unit of the Tarkwa&#239;an type lies within and parallel to the Hound&#233; belt, separated by shear zones on either side. These belts are separated by the Di&#233;bougou granitic domain in Burkina-Faso, whose continuity in C&#244;te d’Ivoire corresponds to that of Doropo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref23">23</xref>], which we call the Doropo Granitic Complex. This area was affected by significant surface weathering and scarcity of outcrops, which hinder cartographic surveying, mining exploration and therefore structural study. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref30">30</xref>] has identified many lithological groups: Biotite granite, gneissic granite, granodiorite, gabbro, amphibolite, tonalite, rhyolite and dolerite (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Recent works in the region, agree to distinguish four major groups of granitoids, corresponding to four magmatic episodes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref24">24</xref>]. The nature of these different granitoids (ME1 to ME4 at regional scale, according to WAXI project researchers) was constrained by radiometric and satellite geophysical data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref27">27</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Methodology</title><p>The study of the mafic intrusives of Doropo consisted of a sampling step followed by thin section preparation and geochemical analyses from 04 representative samples taken in the localities of Gbab&#233;djou and Doropo (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The thin sections and their microscopic description were carried out at the Laboratory of Geology Mineral Resource and Energetic (LGRME) of University F&#233;lix Houphou&#235;t-Boigny of Abidjan-Cocody. Geochemical analyses on whole-rock were carried out by Bureau Veritas (Vancouver). In practice, major elements were analyzed by X-ray fluorescence using an XRF while REEs and trace elements were tested by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) using an Agilent 7700&#215; mass spectrometer. For major elements, approximately 0.5 g of the rock powder was mixed with ~3 - 6 g of Li<sub>2</sub>B<sub>4</sub>O<sub>7</sub>, and ~3 - 4 drops of NH<sub>4</sub>Br was added and the mixture fused in a furnace to form a glass disk. The disks were then analyzed using a current and voltage of 50 mA and ~50 kV, respectively. To quantify trace elements, about 100 mg of crushed whole-rock powder were dissolved in 2 ml HF and 1 ml HNO<sub>3</sub> in a closed Teflon bomb, which was heated on a hot plate at 140˚C, then opened and subsequently evaporated to dryness to remove silica. After evaporation all samples were subjected to three steps of evaporation with decreasing HNO<sub>3</sub> quantities and at increasing temperatures up to 150˚C to remove fluorides. Samples were then dissolved in 2% HNO<sub>3</sub> and diluted shortly before analysis to a final dilution factor of ca. 5000. Dilution factor were kept high to avoid detector saturation, and to minimize drift which was corrected for by addition of doping elements, namely In and Bi, at a concentration level of 1 ppb. The solutions were then analyzed using ICP-MS analyses and analytical uncertainties were 1% - 3% relative to elements present in concentrations &gt; 1 wt%, and about 10% relative to elements present in concentrations &lt; 1 wt%. The instruments conditions are given in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref31">31</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref32">32</xref>] while quality control of the analyses required the use of standard samples (DS11, GS311-1 and GS910-4) and the accuracy was better than 1%. Data processing and diagrams were done using GCD Kit 4.2 software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref33">33</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Petrographic Description</title><sec id="s4_1_1"><title>4.1.1. Gabbro</title><p>This lithological unit outcrops as a dyke through the biotite granite (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)).</p><p>It is a massive rock, dark green and crossed by quartz and pegmatite veins at the contact zones with the granite. The thin sections analysis revealed a grained texture where green hornblende is present in very large quantities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d)). This mineral appears under two habitus within the studied samples. The first habitus results from the partial or complete secondary alteration of clinopyroxene while the second, interstitial in size, appears igneous. The plagioclases are strongly altered, giving rise to sericite and sometimes epidote. Clinopyroxenes are less abundant and difficult to observe because of their alteration. In the contact zones with biotite granite, the samples show accumulation of biotite and quartz. Sphene and some ferro-titanium minerals remain the primary accessory phases.</p></sec><sec id="s4_1_2"><title>4.1.2. Amphibolite</title><p>Amphibolite generally outcrops as enclaves in biotite granite or granodiorite. This rock is also massive, green black and covered by a weak oxidation layer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)).</p><p>It is crossed by small rectilinear or wavy quartz veins, giving the appearance of a foliation. In terms of deformation, mineral lineation defined by hornblende and schistosity have been observed in the oval enclaves. Thin section study shows a medium-grained and nematoblastic texture (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)). Sub-euhedral green hornblende forms the main mineral phase of the rock. Plagioclase exists throughout the rock in abundant quantities and is highly altered. Clinopyroxene is less abundant and similar in size to hornblende. Numerous small sphene crystals, sometimes included in the hornblende, constitute the primary accessory phase, while sericite and epidote are partly related to the destabilization of plagioclase.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Geochemistry of Doropo Mafic Intrusive</title><sec id="s4_2_1"><title>4.2.1. Classification</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> gives the composition of major elements (wt%) and trace elements (ppm) of the mafic rocks of the Doropo area. For the samples analyzed, SiO<sub>2</sub> contents range from 48.00 to 50.80 wt% with the low values of loss on ignition (0.72% - 1.23%). Most of the samples are characterized by moderate to high Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (9.29 - 17.40 wt%), and CaO (9.88 - 14.0 wt%) contents, and variable Na<sub>2</sub>O (2.07 - 3.65 wt%) and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> contents (0.05 - 0.39 wt%) while TiO<sub>2</sub> concentrations</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Major (%) and trace (ppm) elements composition of mafic rocks from Doropo</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rock type</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Gabbro</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Amphibolite</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample number</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RHO3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RHO5a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RHO5b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GBA6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Major elements (wt%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg#</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trace elements (ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >278</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >412</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >452</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ga</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >469.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >466.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >277.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >413.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >U</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >210.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >La</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ho</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Er</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ƩREE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >222.31</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>remain below 2%. On Mg# [i.e. ratio of MgO/(MgO + FeOt)] values, all Doropo mafic rocks range from 0.33 to 0.57. The TAS diagram applied to the mafic rocks of the study area, allows to identify them as gabbros (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a)). However, the amphibolite is alkaline and the gabbros correspond to sub-alkaline rocks according to the subdivision of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref34">34</xref>]. In the FeOt/MgO vs SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref35">35</xref>], two evolutionary trends are highlighted by the studied samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b)). The gabbros follow a calc-alkaline evolution while the amphibolite indicates a tholeiitic affinity. The A/NK vs. A/CNK diagram of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref36">36</xref>] characterized the Doropo mafic intrusives as “metaluminous” rocks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Following this classification, no peraluminous or peralkaline mafic rocks were identified in the study area.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_2"><title>4.2.2. Geodynamic Context</title><p>The TiO<sub>2</sub>-10 * MnO-10 * P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> ternary diagram of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref37">37</xref>] shows that the mafic rocks of Doropo have the character of Island-type environment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Samples GBA-6, RHO-3 and RHO-5b are thought to be arc tholeiites while the RHO-5a gabbro is thought to be a calc-alkaline basalt.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_3"><title>4.2.3. Trace Elements Distribution</title><p>The gabbros have Rare Earth Elements contents (ΣREE) between 135 and 171 ppm and are characterized by slightly parallel patterns. Amphibolite GBA-6 with high concentrations of La and Ce has ΣREE = 222 ppm and its REE pattern remains similar to that of the gabbros (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). In general, the gabbros are highly fractionated, LREE-enriched [(La/Sm)<sub>N</sub> = 2.66 - 6.13] and moderately</p><p>HREE-depleted [(La/Yb)<sub>N</sub> = 11.1; 7 - 43.70] with a negative Eu anomaly translated by Eu/Eu* = 0.75 - 0.97. For the gabbros, there is also a negative anomaly in Ce [with Ce/Ce* = 0.78 - 1.14]. From multi-element diagrams normalized to the early mantle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref38">38</xref>], the Doropo mafic rocks are characterized by strong negative anomalies in Nb, Ta, P, Ti (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). Enrichments are reflected by U and La. These different geochemical signatures of the mafic rocks suggest significant crustal contamination.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>Petrographic studies carried out in northeast of C&#244;te d’Ivoire have highlighted the existence of mafic rocks in the granitic domain of the Doropo region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref30">30</xref>]. These rocks, composed of gabbro dykes and amphibolite enclaves are characterized by a paragenesis mainly composed of green hornblende, plagioclase and clinopyroxene. This mineralogical composition is typical of mafic rocks described in the Birimian domain of the West African craton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref42">42</xref>]. The secondary paragenesis (epidote-sericite-hornblende) would be related to hydrothermal alteration or retrograde metamorphism of the Birimian massifs. On the basis of their SiO<sub>2</sub> and alkaline contents, most of these mafic rocks may be classified as gabbro, with calc-alkaline to moderately tholeiite affinity. Sample GBA-6 shows TiO<sub>2</sub> contents (1.26 wt%), which can be explained in terms of an accumulation of ilmenite, titanite or hornblende. In fact, abnormal abundance of a TiO<sub>2</sub>-rich phase (hornblende specially) is petrographically observed in the gabbro samples from Doropo. Magmatic rocks derived from primary magma generally have high MgO, Mg#, and Ni contents (~15 wt%, &gt;0.7 and &gt;500 ppm, respectively). In contrast, samples from the study area show variable MgO (6.14 - 11.10 with an average of 8.3 wt%) and Ni &lt; 50 ppm (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). These data indicate that the Gbab&#233;djou amphibolite and Doropo gabbros underwent a magmatic differentiation process before emplacement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref43">43</xref>]. Regarding the magmatic source attributes of the studied rocks, their TiO<sub>2</sub> contents below 2%, similar to the mafic formations of the south-western Iberian massif [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref44">44</xref>], allows them to be interpreted as Ti-poor basalts. Similarly, the Zr/Ti ratio = 0.01 of the GBA-6 amphibolite and its Ni content = 14.8 ppm suggest an ortho-derivative magmatic origin according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref45">45</xref>]. The geochemical study also reveals that the Gbab&#233;djou and Doropo samples have two possible lineages: tholeiitic and calc-alkaline. This is in agreement with the work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref46">46</xref>], [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref40">40</xref>] which in the Paleoproterozoic domain identify bimodal volcanism. The behaviour of immobile elements within the Doropo mafic rocks provides an argument that concerned samples do not represent a real composition of mantle-derived, probably reflecting that most of them must have undergone crustal contamination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref47">47</xref>]. In fact, mafic rocks are typically characterized by flat rare earth pattern with HFSE enrichment. However, the Doropo studied rocks are enriched in lithophile elements and slightly depleted in HFSE with negative anomalies in Nb–Ta especially reflecting crustal contamination. Also, with an average Nb/Yb ratio well above 2.95 characteristic value of E-MORBs according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref38">38</xref>] these rocks would be more favorable to the assumption of an oceanic crust or mantle source with crustal contamination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref43">43</xref>]. In the La/Ba vs. La/Nb diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0), most samples fall outside the oceanic island basalts (OIB) indicating a lithospheric affinity or influence of crustal material during the formation of the Doropo basalts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref43">43</xref>].</p><p>In other words, crustal contamination appears to have played an important role in the formation of these mafic intrusives. Based on trace element distribution and geotectonic evolution, we suggest that crustal contamination occurred in a subduction zone or during diapiric uplift in an Archean-type tectonic setting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref50">50</xref>]. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref23">23</xref>] showed that the rocks of this Birimian part of C&#244;te d’Ivoire have TTG affinities, suggesting that their contamination would have occurred in an Archean-type geodynamic context. Indeed, the study area, characterized by a granite basement with fracture deformation giving rise to numerous dykes, is located between two large greenstone belts (T&#233;hini and Lawra) corresponding to lithospheric structures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref51">51</xref>]. After the emplacement of the granitoid that constitute the Doropo Birimian basement, mantle-derived magma, driven by a diapir, is thought to have been injected at the base of the continental crust with an Archean TTG affinity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref11">11</xref>]. The heat supplied by the basic liquid induces partial melting of the overlying crust giving rise to crustal anatectic liquids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref53">53</xref>]. These mixed incompletely with the basic component to give a contaminated magma enriched in lithophile elements, which was promptly drained to the upper crust to form the mafic “tholeiite” intrusives in the Doropo area. Also, this same magma, progressing slowly through the numerous dykes, has undergone both differentiation by fractional crystallization and significant mixing under the effect of flow in the rather narrow conduits. This would have allowed the formation of a second magma that was clearly more differentiated and more homogenized. This magma is thought to be the source of the “calc-alkaline” intrusive in the Doropo area. Similarly, referring to the work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118277-ref1">1</xref>] in the area of Gaoua, the hypothesis of crustal contamination during a horizontal tectonic regime particularly in the subduction modern-type zone would also seem probable for the Doropo rocks.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>The mafic rocks of the Doropo area consist of gabbro and amphibolite outcropping as dykes and enclaves. These lithological units are characterised by mineralogy: hornblende, plagioclase, clinopyroxene, epidote, sericite, sphene and ferrotitanium minerals. Despite the existence of a secondary paragenesis due to the alteration of plagioclase and hornblende, the Gbab&#233;djou amphibolite with Zr/Ti ratio = 0.01 and Ni = 14.8 ppm indicates a magmatic origin. Their Mg# range between 0.33 - 0.57 confirm that the studied sample is not cumulate but has low Ti-basaltic affinity. The distribution of trace elements shows that Doropo mafic intrusive are poorly enriched in HFSE and depleted in Nb, P and Ti, which are characteristic features of crustal contamination. Regarding geodynamic emplacement, the mafic rocks from Doropo correspond to crustal materials that evolved in an Archean-type geodynamic context. Magma driven by mantle diapir has been injected at the base of the continental crust with an Archean TTG affinity and the heat induces the partial melting of the overlying crust giving rise to mixed liquids. This magma enriched in lithophile elements was immediately drained to the upper crust to form the most of mafic rocks from the studied area.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work is part of the projects financed by AMPELLA-CENTAMIN and supported by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of C&#244;te d’Ivoire (MESRS). The authors would like to thank Mrs. Fid&#232;le KAKOU and Pierrick COUDERC for their logistical support during field missions in the Northeast of C&#244;te d’Ivoire.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Digbeu, W., Kouamelan, A.N., Tshibubudze, A., Siagne, Z.H. and Kouadio, F.J.-L.H. (2022) Geochemistry of Mafic Rocks from the Birimian Basement of Doropo (Northeast of C&#244;te d’Ivoire): Petrogenetic and Geodynamic Implications. Open Journal of Geology, 12, 504-520. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2022.126024</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.118277-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baratoux, L.L., Metelka, V., Naba, S., Jessell, M.W., Grégoire, M. and Ganne, J. (2011) Juvenile Paleoproterozoic Crust Evolution during the Eburnean Orogeny (～2.2-2.0 Ga), Western Burkina Faso. Precambrian Research, 191, 18-45.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.08.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perrouty, S., Aillères, L., Jessell, M.W., Baratoux, L., Bourassa, Y. and Crawford, B. (2012) Revised Eburnean Geodynamic Evolution of the Gold-Rich Southern Ashanti Belt, Ghana, with New Field and Geophysical Evidence of pre-Tarkwaian Deformations. Precambrian Research, 204-205, 12-39.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2012.01.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Block, S., Ganne, J., Baratoux, L., Zeh, A., Parra, L.A., Jessell, M., Allères, L. and Siebenaller, L. (2016) Lower Crust Exhumation during Paleoproterozoic (Eburnean) Orogeny, NW Ghana, West African Craton: Interplay of Coeval Contractional Deformation and Extensional Gravitational Collapse. Precambrian Research, 274, 82-109.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.10.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mortimer, J. (1992) Lithostratigraphy of the Early Proterozoic Toumodi Volcanic Group in Central cote d’ivoire: Implications for Birrimian Stratigraphic Models. Journal of African Earth Sciences (and the Middle East), 14, 81-91.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(92)90057-J</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sylvester, P.J. and Attoh, K. (1992) Lithostratigraphy and Composition of 2.1 Ga Greenstone Belts of the West African Craton and Their Bearing on Crustal Evolution and the Archean-Proterozoic Boundary. The Journal of Geology, 100, 377-393.  
https://doi.org/10.1086/629593</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asiedu, D.K., Dampare, S.B., Sakyi, P.A., Banoeng-Yakubo, B., Osae, S., Nyarko, B.J.B. and Manu, J. (2004) Geochemistry of Paleoproterozoic Metasedimentary Rocks from the Birim Diamondiferous Field, Southern Ghana: Implications for Provenance and Crustal Evolution at the Archean-Proterozoic Boundary. Geochemical Journal, 38, 215-228. https://doi.org/10.2343/geochemj.38.215</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dampare, S.B., Shibata, T., Asiedu, D.K., Osae, S. and Banoeng-Yakubo, B. (2008) Geochemistry of Paleoproterozoic Metavolcanic Rocks from the Southern Ashanti Volcanic Belt, Ghana: Petrogenetic and Tectonic Setting Implications. Precambrian Research, 162, 403-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2007.10.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abouchami, W., Boher, M., Michard, A. and Albarede, F. (1990) A Major 2.1 Ga Event of Mafic Magmatism in West Africa: An Early Stage of Crustal Accretion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 95, 17605-17629.  
https://doi.org/10.1029/JB095iB11p17605</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boher, M., Abouchami, W., Michard, A., Albarede, F. and Arndt, N.T. (1992) Crustal Growth in West Africa at 2.1 Ga. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 97, 345-369. https://doi.org/10.1029/91JB01640</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abitty, E.K., Dampare, S.B., Nude, P.M. and Asiedu, D.K. (2016) Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of the K-Rich ‘Bongo-Type’ Granitoids in the Paleoproterozoic Bole-Nangodi Greenstone Belt of Ghana. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 122, 47-62.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.08.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouamelan, A.N., Delor, C. and Peucat, J.-J. (1997) Geochronological Evidence for Reworking of Archean Terrains during the Early Proterozoic (2.1 Ga) in the Western Cote D’Ivoire (Man Rise-West African Craton). Precambrian Research, 86, 177-199.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(97)00043-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koffi, G.R.-S., Kouamelan, A.N., Allialy, M.E., Coulibaly, Y. and Peucat, J.-J. (2020) Re-Evaluation of Leonian and Liberian Events in the Geodynamical Evolution of the Man-Leo Shield (West African Craton). Precambrian Research, 338, Article ID: 105582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2019.105582</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thiéblemont, D., Goujou, J.C., Egal, E., Cocherie, A., Delor, C., Lafon, J.M. and Fanning, C.M. (2004) Archean Evolution of the Leo Rise and Its Eburnean Reworking. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 39, 97-104.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2004.07.059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eglinger, A., Thebaud, N., Zeh, A., Davis, J., Miller, J., Parra, L.A., Loucks, R., McCuaig, C. and Belousova, E. (2017) New Insights into the Crustal Growth of the Paleoproterozoic Margin of the Archean Kéména-Man Domain, West African Craton (Guinea): Implications for Gold Mineral System. Precambrian Research, 292, 258-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2016.11.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouamelan, A.N., Djro, S.C., Allialy, M.E., Paquette, J.-L. and Peucat, J.-J. (2015) The Oldest Rock of Ivory Coast. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 103, 65-70.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.12.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gouedji, F., Picard, C., Coulibaly, Y., Audet, M.A., Auge, T., Goncalves, P. and Ouattara, N. (2014) The Samapleu Maficultramafic Intrusion and Its Ni-Cu-PGE Mineralization: An Eburnean (2.09 Ga) Feeder Dyke to the Yacouba Layered Complex (Man Archean Craton, Western Ivory Coast). Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 185, 393-411. https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.185.6.393</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirdes, W., Davis, D.W., Lüdtke, G. and Konan, G. (1996) Two Generations of Birimian (Paleo-Proterozoic) Volcanic Belts in Northeastern Cote d’Ivoire (West Africa): Consequences for the “Birimian Controversy”. Precambrian Research, 80, 173-191.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(96)00011-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doumbia, S., Pouclet, A., Kouamelan, A., Peucat, J.J., Vidal, M. and Delor, C. (1998) Petrogenesis of Juvenile-Type Birimian (Paleoproterozoic) Granitoids in Central Cote-d’Ivoire, West Africa: Geochemistry and Geochronology. Precambrian Research, 87, 33-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(97)00201-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gasquet, D., Barbey, P., Adou, M. and Paquette, J.L. (2003) Structure, Sr-Nd Isotope Geochemistry and Zircon U-Pb Geochronology of the Granitoids of the Dabakala Area (Cote d’Ivoire): Evidence for a 2.3 Ga Crustal Growth Event in the Palaeoproterozoic of West Africa? Precambrian Research, 127, 329-354.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(03)00209-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naba, S., Lompo, M., Debat, P., Bouchez, J.L. and Béziat, D. (2004) Structure and Emplacement Model for Late-Orogenic Paleoproterozoic Granitoids: The Tenkodogo-Yamba Elongate Pluton (Eastern Burkina Faso). Journal of African Earth Sciences, 38, 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2003.09.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dioh, E., Béziat, D., Debat, P., Grégoire, M. and Ngom, P.M. (2006) Diversity of the Palaeoproterozoic Granitoids of the Kédougou Inlier (Eastern Sénégal): Petrographical and Geochemical Constraints. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 44, 351-371.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.11.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ilboudo, H., Sawadogo, S., Kagambega, N. and Remmal, T. (2021) Petrology, Geochemistry, and Source of the Emplacement Model of the Paleoproterozoic Tiébélé Granite Pluton, Burkina Faso (West-Africa): Contribution to Mineral Exploration. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 110, 1753-1781.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-021-02039-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vidal, M., Gumiaux, C., Cagnard, F., Pouclet, A., Ouattara, G. and Pichon, M. (2009) Evolution of a Paleoproterozoic “Weak Type” Orogeny in the West African Craton (Ivory Coast). Tectonophysics, 477, 145-159.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.02.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Metelka, V., Baratoux, L., Naba, S. and Jessell, M.W. (2011) A Geophysically Constrained Litho-Structural Analysis of the Eburnean Greenstone Belts and Associated Granitoid Domains, Burkina Faso, West Africa. Precambrian Research, 190, 48-69.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.08.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baratoux, L., Metelka, V., Siebenaller, L., Naba, S., Naré, A., Ouiya, P., Jessell, M.W., Béziat, D., Salvi, S. and Franceschi, G. (2015) Tectonic Evolution of the Gaoua Region, Burkina Faso: Implications for Mineralization. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 112, 419-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.10.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Augustin, J. and Gaboury, D. (2015) Paleoproterozoic Plume-Related Basaltic Rocks in the Mana Gold District in Western Burkina Faso, West Africa: Implications for Exploration and the Source of Gold in Orogenic Deposits. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 129, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.12.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amponsah, P.O., Salvi, S., Béziat, D., Siebenaller, L., Baratoux, L. and Jessell, M.W. (2015) Geology and Geochemistry of the Shear-Hosted Julie Gold Deposit, NW Ghana. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 112, 505-523.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.06.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grenholm, M., Jessell, M. and Thébaud, N. (2019) A Geodynamic Model for the Paleoproterozoic (ca. 2.27-1.96 Ga) Birimian Orogen of the Southern West African Craton—Insights into an Evolving Accretionary-Collisional Orogenic System. Earth-Science Reviews, 192, 138-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.02.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Milési, J.P., Feybesse, J.L., Pinna, P., Deschamps, Y., Kampunzu, H., Muhongo, S., Lescuyer, J.L., Le Golf, E., Delor, C., Billa, M., Ralay, F. and Heinry, C. (2004) Geological Map of Africa 1:10,000,000, SIGAfrique Project. 20th Conference of African Geology, BRGM, Orléans, June 2004, 2-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siagné, Z.H., Aifa, T., Kouamelan, A.N., Houssou, N.N. and Digbeu, W. (2021) Analyse Structurale De La Déformation Dans Les Granitoides éburnéens De La Région De Doropo (Nord-Est De La Cote d’Ivoire). European Scientific Journal, 17, 157-172. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2021.v17n29p157</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Skursch, O., Tegner, C., Lesher, C.E. and Cawthorn, R.G. (2020) Two Expressions of the Transition from Mafic Cumulates to Granitoids in the Bushveld Complex, South Africa: Examples from the Western and Eastern Limbs. Lithos, 372-373, Article ID: 105671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2020.105671</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eggins, S.M. (2003) Laser Ablation ICP-MS Analysis of Geological Materials Prepared as Lithium Borate Glasses. Geostandard Newsletter, 27, 147-162.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.2003.tb00642.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Janousek, V., Farrow, C.M. and Erban, V. (2006) Interpretation of Whole-Rock Geo-Chemical Data in Igneous Geochemistry: Introducing Geochemical Data Toolkit (GCDkit). Journal of Petrology, 47, 1255-1259.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egl013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Irvine, T.N. and Baragar, W.R.A. (1971) A Guide to the Chemical Classification of the Common Volcanic Rocks. The Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 8, 523-548.  
https://doi.org/10.1139/e71-055</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miyashiro, A. (1974) Volcanic Rock Series in Island Arcs and Active Continental Margins. American Journal of Science, 274, 321-355.  
https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.274.4.321</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maniar, P.D. and Piccoli, P.M. (1989) Tectonic Discrimination of Granitoids. GSA Bulletin, 101, 635-643.  
https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1989)101&lt;0635:TDOG&gt;2.3.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mullen, E.D. (1983) MnO/TiO2/P2O5: A Minor Element Discriminant for Basaltic Rocks of Oceanic Environments and Its Implications for Petrogenesis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 62, 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(83)90070-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, S.-S. and McDonough, W.F. (1989) Chemical and Isotopic Systematics of Oceanic Bas Basalts: Implications for Mantle Composition and Processes. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 42, 313-345.  
https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Boynton, W.V. (1984) Chapter 3. Cosmochemistry of the Rare Earth Elements: Meteorite Studies. In: Henderson, P., Ed., Developments in Geochemistry, Vol. 2, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 63-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-42148-7.50008-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anum, S., Sakyi, P.A., Su, B., Nude, P.M., Nyame, F., Asiedu, D. and Kwayisi, D. (2015) Geochemistry and Geochronology of Granitoids in the Kibi-Asamankese Area of the Kibi-Winneba Volcanic Belt, Southern Ghana. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 102, 166-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.11.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koffi, A.Y., Kouamelan, A.N., Djro, S.C., Kouadio, F.J.-L.H., Teha, K.R., Kouassi, B.R. and Koffi, G.R.S. (2018) Pétrographie et origine des métasédiments du domaine SASCA (SW de la Cote d’lvoire). International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 23, 451-464.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Labou, I., Benoit, M., Baratoux, L., Grégoire, M., Ndiaye, M.P., Thebaud, N. and Debat, P. (2020) Petrological and Geochemical Study of Birimian Ultramafic Rocks within the West African Craton: Insights from Mako (Senegal) and Loraboué (Burkina Faso) Lher-Zolite/Harzburgite/Wehrlite Associations. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 162, Article ID: 103677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.103677</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J., Wang, X., Liu, J., Liu, Z., Zhai, D. and Wang, Y. (2019) Geology, Geochemistry, and Geochronology of Gabbro from the Haoyaoerhudong Gold Deposit, Northern Margin of the North China Craton. Minerals, 9, Article No. 1.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/min9010063</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gómez-Pugnaire, M.T., Azor, A., Fernández-Soler, J.M. and López Sánchez-Vizcaino, V. (2003) The Amphibolites from the Ossa-Morena/Central Iberian Variscan Suture (Southwestern Iberian Massif): Geochemistry and Tectonic Interpretation. Lithos, 68, 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-4937(03)00018-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Winchester, J.A. and Max, M.D. (1982) The Geochemistry and Origins of the Precambrian Rocks of the Rosslare Complex, SE Ireland. Journal of the Geological Society, 139, 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.139.3.0309</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pouclet, A., Vidal, M., Delor, C., Simeon, Y. and Alric, G. (1996) Le volcanisme birimien du nord-est de la Cote-d’Ivoire, mise en evidence de deux phases volcano-tectoniques distinctes dans l’evolution geodynamique du Paleoproterozoique. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 167, 529-541.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saccani, E. (2015) A New Method of Discriminating Different Types of Post-Archean Ophiolitic Basalts and Their Tectonic Significance Using Th-Nb and Ce-Dy-Yb Systematics. Geoscience Frontiers, 6, 481-501.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2014.03.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Floyd, P.A. and Winchester, J.A. (1975) Magma Type and Tectonic Setting Discrimination Using Immobile Elements. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 27, 211-218.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(75)90031-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sajona, F.G., Maury, R.C., Bellon, H., Cotten, J. and Defant, M. (1996) High Field Strength Element Enrichment of Pliocene-Pleistocene Island Arc Basalts, Zamboanga Peninsula, Western Mindanao (Philippines). Journal of Petrology, 37, 693-726.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/37.3.693</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wane, O., Liégeois, J.-P., Thébaud, N., Miller, J., Metelka, V. and Jessell, M. (2018) The Onset of the Eburnean Collision with the Kenema-Man Craton Evidenced by Plutonic and Volcanosedi-Mentary Rock Record of the Masssigui Region, Southern Mali. Precambrian Research, 305, 444-478.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2017.11.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lompo, M. (2010) Paleoproterozoic Structural Evolution of the Man-Leo Shield (West Africa). Key Structures for Vertical to Transcurrent Tectonics. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 58, 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2010.01.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lompo, M. (2009) Geodynamic Evolution of the 2.25-2.0 Ga Palaeoproterozoic Magmatic Rocks in the Man-Leo Shield of the West African Craton. A Model of Subsidence of an Oceanic Plateau. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 323, 231-254. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP323.11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118277-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smithies, R.H., Lu, Y., Johnson, T.E., Kirkland, C.L., Cassidy, K.F., Champion, D.C. and Poujol, M. (2019) No Evidence for High-Pressure Melting of Earth’s Crust in the Archean. Nature Communications, 10, Article No. 1.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13547-x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>