<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Surgical Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-9407</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ss.2022.136035</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">SS-118017</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Ulcero-Necrotic Wound: Socio-Economic Impact, Kayes, Mali
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lamine</surname><given-names>Issaga Traore</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sidy</surname><given-names>Sangare</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gaoussou</surname><given-names>Sogoba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mamaye</surname><given-names>Kouyate</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdoulaye</surname><given-names>Cisse</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bakary</surname><given-names>Skeita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sadio</surname><given-names>Dembele</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lassina</surname><given-names>Goita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adama</surname><given-names>Sdiakité</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mariam</surname><given-names>Sanogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moussa</surname><given-names>Camara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8"><sup>8</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Drissa</surname><given-names>Traore</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8"><sup>8</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care of the Hospital Fousseyni Daou de Kayes, Kayes, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Departmenturology of the Hospital Fousseyni Daou de Kayes, Kayes, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff8"><addr-line>Department of General Surgery of the Hospital CHU du Point “G”, Kayes, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Pediatric Surgery of the Hospital Fousseyni Daou de Kayes, Kayes, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff7"><addr-line>Department of Social of the Hospital Fousseyni Daou de Kayes, Kayes, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Dermatology and Venereology of the Hospital Fousseyni Daou de Kayes, Kayes, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of General Surgery of the Hospital Fousseyni Daou de Kayes, Kayes, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Infectious Diseases Unit of the Hospital Fousseyni Daou de Kayes, Kayes, Mali</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>06</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>280</fpage><lpage>287</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The issue of wound care has always played an important role in the practice of medicine. This is evidenced by Ambroise Par&#233;’s decision to publish his first work on this subject, “La mani&#232;re de traiter les Plaies” (The Way of Treating Wounds) in 1545.<b> </b><b></b><b><b>Objective:</b></b> To evaluate the therapeutic methods we practice and to describe the impact of the pathology on socio-economic and professional development. <b></b><b><b>Patients and Method:</b></b> This was a retrospective study carried out at the Fousseyni Daou Hospital in Kayes from January 1, 2018
  ,
   to December 31, 2020. We included all patients with an ulcero-necrotic wound on immunocompetent terrain hospitalized in the department. Patients with ulcerative necrotic wounds o
  f
   diabetes, HIV
  ,
   or cancerous origin were not included. The parameters studied were: etiologies, local care, sequelae, 
  and 
  socio-economic and professional aspects. <b></b><b><b>Results:</b></b> We collected 57 patients of whom 43 were men and 14 were women, i.e. a sex ratio of 3. The mean age was 40.7 years with a standard deviation of 8.4 with extremes (7 years and 80 years). The average consultation time was 25.1 days. The most represented socio-professional stratum was agropastoralism in 37 cases (65%). The predominant etiological factor was neglected traumatic wounds in 34 cases (59.6%). The site was the lower limb in 39 cases (68.5%). The germ found was Staphylococcus aureus in 21 cases (36.8%). The particularity during local care was the use of table sugar in 9 cases (15.7%) and maggot therapy in 2 cases (3.5%). Hyperthermia was the clinical sign of aggravation in 22 cases (38.6%) and we diagnosed 2 cases (3.5%) of tetanus. The mortality rate was 15.7% (9 cases) and 30 cases (52.7%) of sequelae after recovery. The average length of hospitalization was 38 days. Hospital care was provided by the social welfare service in 35 cases (61.4%). Nineteen (19) patients (39.5%) were unable to resume their socio-professional activity. <b></b><b><b>Conclusion:</b></b>
   Ulcero-necrotic wounds are complex to manage and can have a lifelong influence on the socio-pro
  fessional and economic activity of patients.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Ulcero-Necrotic Wound</kwd><kwd> Surgery</kwd><kwd> Disability</kwd><kwd> Socio-Economic</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Ulcero-necrotic wounds (UWN) are acute bacterial infections of the deep layers of the skin by aerobic and/or anaerobic bacteria of varied topography and microbiology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref2">2</xref>]. It progresses to chronicity when there is an absence of healing within 4 - 6 weeks has failed to follow the normal methodical process of healing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref3">3</xref>]. Ulcero-necrotic wounds are a medical-surgical emergency whose evolution may lead to septicemia, which is sometimes fatal for the patient. The germs frequently found are beta-hemolytic Streptococcus and Staphylococcus aureus, but a poly-microbial association is sometimes noted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref3">3</xref>]. There is a male predominance with preferential involvement of the lower limbs. PUN presents as a blackish necrotic lesion on an inflamed, edematous, and very painful limb associated with other local signs: oedema, induration, haemorrhagic bullae, cyanotic placard, greyish livid zone, cutaneous hypoesthesia, snowy crepitation, muscle deficit. The chronicity of ulcero-necrotic wounds is a public health problem. In France, according to the inter-regime health insurance information system, in 2012, 670,000 patients were treated for chronic wounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref4">4</xref>]. In the United States, 500,000 to 600,000 patients are treated for chronic limb ulcers per year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref5">5</xref>]. In sub-Saharan Africa, several studies have suggested an infectious etiology of ulcero-necrotic wounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref7">7</xref>]. Because of their chronicity, ulcero-necrotic wounds have a major repercussion on the quality of life of the patients and decrease their autonomy; they have an impact on the socio-economic development of the patient’s family and the State through the hospital social assistance service.</p><sec id="s1_1"><title>1.1. Objectives</title><p>To evaluate our therapeutic methods, and to describe the impact of the pathology on the socio-economic development of patients.</p></sec><sec id="s1_2"><title>1.2. Patients and Method</title><p>This was a retrospective study conducted at the Fousseyni Daou Hospital in Kayes from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020. We included all immunocompetent patients with ulcero-necrotic wounds hospitalized in the department. Patients with ulcero-necrotic wounds on diabetic, HIV or cancerous grounds were not included. The parameters studied were: etiologies, local care, sequelae and socioeconomic impact.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Results</title><p>During the study period, 57 patients were recorded, i.e. 1.3% of our activities; they were 43 men (75.4%) and 14 women, i.e. a sex ratio of 3. The mean age was 40.7 years, with a standard deviation of 8.4 and extremes of 7 years and 80 years. The average consultation time was 25.1 days. The socio-occupational activity was agropastoralism in 65% of cases. The most predominant factors were traditional treatment in 49 cases (86%), followed by neglected traumatic wounds in 34 cases (59.6%) (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The site of the UIPs varied, they were located on the lower limb in 39 cases (68.5%) (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref>). Antibiograms were performed in 35 cases (61.4%), the most common germ was staphylococcus aureus in 21 cases (36.8%). The clinical signs of severity were hyperthermia in 22 cases (38.6%), severe anemia in 20 cases (35.1%) and tetanus in 2 cases (3.5%). Local care (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref>) was excision of necrotic tissue in 48 cases (84.2%), for some patients table sugar (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) was used in 9 cases (15.7%) and maggot</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to contributing factors</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Favouring factors</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effectif</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traditional treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neglected traumatic wound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Snake bite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Squirrel bite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Human bite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vascular</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Depigmenting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Erysipelas</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Escarre</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fournier’s Gangrene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients by site</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Seat</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effectif</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower limb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper limb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trunk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >External genitalia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Head</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients by local care</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Local care</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effectif</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Excision of necrotic tissue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antiseptic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydrogel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>sugar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asticotherapy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limb amputation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Skin grafting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9/57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>therapy in 2 cases (3.5%) (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), skin grafting was performed in 9 cases (15.7%) and limb amputation in 8 cases (14%). The evolution (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4) was marked by recovery without sequelae in 18 cases (31.6%), recovery with sequelae was observed in 30 cases (52.7%), the sequelae (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>5) were predominantly in</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4</label><caption><title> Distribution of patients by outcome</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Evolution</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effectif</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Healing with sequelae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Healing without sequelae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Deaths</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>5</label><caption><title> Distribution of patients by nature of sequelae</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nature of sequelae</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effectif</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limb Handicap</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cutaneous dyschromia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scar flange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Loss of sight in one eye</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IMO intermittent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Limb disability: amputation, stiffness, ankylosis. OMI: edema of the lower limbs.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>6</label><caption><title> Distribution by hospital management</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Taking charge</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effectif</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Social Service</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Family</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Himself</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>7</label><caption><title> Distribution of socio-economic and professional activity</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Resumption of activity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effectif</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The non-takeover</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Partial recovery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total recovery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>the limbs in 24 cases (80%). The average duration of hospitalization was 38 days. Hospital care was provided by the social welfare service in 35 cases (61.4%) and by the patient’s family in 17 cases (29.8%) (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>6). 19 cases (39.5%) did not fully resume socio-economic and professional activities and 11 cases (23%) partially resumed (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>7). The overall mortality was 15.7%.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Discussion</title><p>In our study, the predominant population was male, i.e. 75.4% of the cases. This male predominance has been found in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref8">8</xref>]. The mean age was 47.3 years, which is identical to those found by other authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref10">10</xref>]. In the African series, young adult males are more frequent, contrary to the European series where elderly (65 - 74 years) female subjects are predominant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref11">11</xref>]. The most represented socio-occupational stratum was agropastoralism in 65% of the cases; in Mali this stratum contributes to the gross domestic product of the economy in 44% of the cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref12">12</xref>]. The average delay of consultation was 25.1 days, Traor&#233; A. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref8">8</xref>] in Bamako found 1.2 months. This delay in consultation was due to the lack of means and the choice of traditional treatment as first-line treatment. The most common factor found was neglected traumatic wounds (59.6%), which are the entry point for germs. This is identical to other African studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref13">13</xref>]; in Europe, UTIs are of vascular etiology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>The lesions were located on the lower limb in 68.5% of cases, in line with other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>The germ found after antibiotic susceptibility testing was staphylococcus aureus in 36.8% of cases</p><p>A. Traor&#233; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref8">8</xref>] in Bamako found the same germ in 50.6% of cases. During local care, because of the high cost and the small quantity of hydrogels in relation to the surface of the wound, we resorted to an old practice, which is the use of table sugar in 15.7% of cases, which gave us a good result, with one case of hyper-budding. This practice has been studied by Andrew. B. J. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref18">18</xref>]. Maggot therapy was used in 3.5% of cases. The maggots were collected from the wound; the wound was cleaned with saline and then the same maggots were placed on the wound with a dressing for 48 hours. This procedure gives a good result on fibrin. The only problem with this treatment is the refusal of patients to undergo this protocol. According to Dumville J. C. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref19">19</xref>], maggot therapy significantly reduces the time required for debridement. Self-grafting of the skin was performed in 15.7% of cases in our study; in the literature, this rate varies according to the authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref16">16</xref>]. We performed more skin grafting in pellets, which is inexpensive and is done under local anesthesia. Healing with sequelae was 52.7%, the total non-resumption of socio-professional activity was observed in 39.5% of cases. Hospital care was provided by the social welfare service in 61.4% of cases, which confirms the difficulty of managing PUN. The average duration of follow-up was 2.7 months; A. Souissi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.118017-ref20">20</xref>] in Tunisia found 11.35 months, which could be explained by the etiology of PUN. Depending on the nature of the after-effects, patients were referred to the orthopaedic rehabilitation center, physiotherapy or the orthopaedic trauma department. The overall mortality in our series was 15%, it has not been mentioned by other authors, during our study the deaths were due to tetanus and sepsis.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Our study has allowed us to show that ulcero-necrotic wounds are complex to manage. Poverty is a factor of delay in consultation and difficulty in management. The after-effects are sometimes disabling and can influence the socio-professional and economic activity of the patients for life.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Traore, L.I., Sangare, S., Sogoba, G., Kouyate, M., Cisse, A., Skeita, B., Dembele, S., Goita, L., Sdiakit&#233;, A., Sanogo, M., Camara, M. and Traore, D. (2022) Ulcero-Necrotic Wound: Socio-Economic Impact, Kayes, Mali. Surgical Science, 13, 280-287. https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2022.136035</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.118017-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bernard, P., Bedane, C., Mounier, M., Denis, F. and Bonnet Blanc, J.M. (1995) Dermohypodermites bact&amp;#233riennes de l’adulte: Incidence et place de l’&amp;#233tiologie streptococcique. Ann dermatol venereol, 12, 495-500.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Begon, E., et al. (2013) Erysip&amp;#232le, dermohypodermites bact&amp;#233riennes et fasciites n&amp;#233crosantes. EMC-Dermatologie.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V&amp;#233zina, J. and Saint Pierre, C. (2006) Cahier 7 Le soin des plaies: Principes de bases. [document &amp;#233lectronique]. Universit&amp;#233 du Qu&amp;#233bec, Qu&amp;#233bec. http://w4.uqo.ca/giresss/docs/cahier7_soinplaies.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rames, O., Sebo, S., P&amp;#233cault, R., Agamaliyev, E., Tuppin, P., Dunet, M., et al. (2014) Plaies chroniques en france: Pr&amp;#233valence, caract&amp;#233ristiques et &amp;#233volution. Am&amp;#233liorer l’organisation de la prise en charge en sortie d’hospitalisation. Journal des Plaies et Cicatrisations, 92, 12-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Niang, S.O., Dieng, M.T. and Kane, A. (2007) Ulc&amp;#232re de jambe &amp;#224 Dakar: 75 cas. Annales de Dermatologie et de V&amp;#233n&amp;#233r&amp;#233ologie, 134, 867-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0151-9638(07)92835-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pitch&amp;#233, P., Diatta, B., Faye, O., Ciss&amp;#233, M., Diallo, M., Ndiaye, B., et al. (2015) Facteurs de risque associ&amp;#233s &amp;#224 l’&amp;#233rysip&amp;#232le de jambe en Afrique subsaharienne: &amp;#201tude multicentrique cas-t&amp;#233moins. Annales de Dermatologie et de V&amp;#233n&amp;#233r&amp;#233ologie, 142, 633-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annder.2015.08.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Njim, T., Aminde, L.N., Agbor, V.N., Toukam, L.D., Kashaf, S.S. and Ohuma, E.O. (2017) Risk Factors of Lower Limb Cellulitis in a Level-Two Healthcare Facility in Cameroon: A Case-Control Study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 17, Article No. 418. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2519-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Traor&amp;#233, A., Dembel&amp;#233, B.T., Diakit&amp;#233, I., Pierre, A., et al. (2014) Ulc&amp;#232re n&amp;#233crotique dans le service de chirurgie g&amp;#233n&amp;#233rale du CHU Gabriel Tour&amp;#233. Mali M&amp;#233dical, 29, 10-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chtourou, O., Fazaa, B., Zeglaoui, F., Ezzine, N., Kharfi, M., Mokhtar, I. and Kamoun, M.R. (2002) Profil des ulc&amp;#232res de jambe. &amp;#192 travers une s&amp;#233rie tunisienne de 70 cas. La Tunisie M&amp;#233dicale, 80, 70-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benchikhi, H., Chiheb, S., Khadir, K. and Lakhdar, H. (1998) Les ulc&amp;#232res de jambe pr&amp;#233dominent chez l’homme au Maroc. Ann Dermatol Venereol, 125, 339-340.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cornwall, J.V., Dore, C.J. and Lewis, J.D. (1986) Leg ulcers: Epidemiology and aetiology. British Journal of Surgery, 73, 693-696. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800730905</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Evaluation finale du projet transfert of knowledge through expatriate nationals (Token-Mali). https://erc.UNDP.org&gt;downl</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tianyi, F.-L., Mbanga, C.M., Danwang, C. and Agbor, V.N. (2018) Risk Factors and Complications of Lower Limb Cellulitis in Africa: A Systematic Review. BMJ Open, 8, e021175. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021175</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Picard, D., Klein, A., Grigion, I.S. and Joly, P. (2013) Risk Factors for Abscess Formation in Patients with Superficial Cellulitis (Erysipelas) of the Leg. British Journal of Dermatology, 168, 859-868. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.12148</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perl, B., Gotthehrer, N.P., Raveh, D., Schlesinger, Y., Rudensky, B. and Yinnon, A.M. (1999) Cost-Effectiveness of Blood Cultures for Adult Patients with Cellulitis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 29, 1483-1488. https://doi.org/10.1086/313525</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amblard, P. and Leccia, M.T. (2001) Ulc&amp;#232res de jambe, Encyl Med chir (Editions scientifiques et m&amp;#233dicales Elsevier SAS, Paris) Dermatologie 98-570-A-10, 16 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouaba, K., Sanou, D., Adama, T. and Ouedrago, R. (1998) Les ulc&amp;#232res de Burili au Burkina Faso: &amp;#192 propos de 6 observations et la revue de la litt&amp;#233rature. M&amp;#233decine d’Afrique Noire, 45, 692-697</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andrew, B.J., Rodgers, A. and Walker, N. (2009) Honey as a Topical Treatment for Wounds. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 4, Article No. CD005083. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005083.pub2 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005083.pub2/abstract</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dumville, J.C., Worthy, G., Bland, J.M., Cullum, N., Dowson, C., Iglesias, C., et al. (2009) Larval Therapy for Leg Ulcers (VenUS II): Randomised Controlled Trial. BMJ, 338, Article No. b773. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b773</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.118017-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Souissi, A., Ben Tekaya, N., Youssef, M., Ch&amp;#233rif, F., Mokni, M., El Euch, D., et al. (2005) Ulc&amp;#232res des jambes: &amp;#201tude clinique et &amp;#233pid&amp;#233miologique des malades hospitalis&amp;#233s &amp;#224 Tunis. Annales de Dermatologie et de V&amp;#233n&amp;#233r&amp;#233ologie, 132, 1010-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0151-9638(05)79570-3</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>