Severe damage caused by
R. solani in the potato crop and the current limitations for its control justify the assessment of potential biocontrol agents and their relationship with abiotic factors to be successfully included in sustainable production systems. The aim of this study was to test the effect of temperature (10
˚C, 15
˚C, 25
˚C, 35
˚C) and pH (5.5, 7, 8.5) on the growth and antagonist mechanisms of 26 native strains of 11 species of
Trichoderma for the control of
R. solani. The response obtained was dependent on the isolation, rather than on the
Trichoderma specie that was tested. Most of them showed greater growth at 25
˚C and pH 5.5, with overgrowth values between 75% and 100% and greater percentage of radial growth inhibition (PRGI) at 50%. A greater ability to compete for the substrate is observed, enhanced by its higher growth rate. Hyphal interaction mechanisms were varied and, at least, 92% of the isolations showed a minimum of two different types. Knowledge of the behavior of the different strains in front of varied abiotic factors will enable an understanding of the population dynamic of
Trichoderma and the identification of the most efficient strains for the control of
R. solani.
Biological Control Abiotic Factors Phytopathogen1. Introduction
Rhizoctonia solani is a phytopathogen of worldwide distribution that causes severe losses in the potato crop. Its underground presence and the lack of fungicides of high selectivity and efficiency make it difficult to chemically control this phytopathogen. Other alternative strategies are limited since it has a wide range of host plants and there are no varieties of potatoes available that can resist it. In this context, an alternative would be the implementation of a biological control.
In relation to this, the fungal genus Trichoderma has awakened great interest due to its high activity as a Biological Control Agent (BCA). Many of the studied strains have behaved as invader opportunists, of rapid growth and with high production of spores [1] [2]. This has let them be trade marketed to be included in the crop protection scheme [3].
Control efficacy of the different strains of Trichoderma may be affected by biotic (species and vegetable variety, edaphic microbial interactions) and abiotic factors (type of soil, water potential, temperature, pH) [4]. These factors not only have an effect on the survival of the BCA, but also on its disease control capacity [5].
Although studies have been conducted on the differential behavior among the Trichoderma species [2] [6] and particularly among strains [7] [8], there is no information available about the possible effect of the temperature and pH as environmental factors that influence its growth and mechanism of action for the control of R. solani.
In this respect, studies carried out [4] recorded that temperature and pH are two key factors in the growth, saprophytic capacity and antagonist mechanisms of Trichoderma. This biopesticide resists a wide range of temperatures and its growth rate depends on the species and on the isolation itself [9]. According to these authors, in general, optimal temperatures for the greatest growth would be between 25˚C and 30˚C and would not coincide with the greatest antagonistic activity. Karaoğlu et al. (2018) [10] communicated that the growth capacity depended on the studied strains with the highest values achieved between 37˚C and 42˚C, and without evidence of growth between 2˚C and 4˚C.
Studies have reported that the different strains of Trichoderma are active antagonists of phytopathogens in a wide range of pH [11] [12] or that its behavior is independent of its value [13]. Thereon, pH values between 4.6 and 5 favor the survival of Trichoderma and the control of Fusarium spp. in the cultivation of onion in a greenhouse [1]. In addition, the pH of the medium is a determinant of the enzymatic activity, more than the mycelial growth of Trichoderma as a control mechanism [11] [14]. Also, the production of the secondary metabolite 6 pentyl-alpha pyrone with antifungal function depends on the strain of Trichoderma studied, the culture medium and the pH value [15].
The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate different native strains of Trichoderma under different conditions of temperature and pH for the control of Rhizoctonia solani.
2. Material and Methods2.1. Biological Material
This study was carried out with 26 strains, corresponding to 11 species of Trichoderma, isolated from native forests and cultivated fields in the province of Córdoba (Argentina), with no history of application of Trichoderma spp. were used. Isolation was carried out according to the plate-dilution method [16]. From monosporic cultures, it was established the collection of pure strains that were identified by its morphologic features and its identity, tested by PCR, through the sequencing of the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region in Laboratory of the Institute of Biological Resources of INTA Castelar (Argentina). The sequences of the ITS were compared to those entered in the TRICHOBLAST database to confirm the observed pooling.
The Rhizoctoniasolani Kühn AG-3 (Anastomosis Group 3) strain was isolated from affected potato tubers from Villa Dolores (Córdoba, Argentina) and then, it was molecularly characterized (Laboratory of the Institute of Biological Resources of INTA Castelar Argentina).
Fungal recovery at the time of assessment was done through sowing (mycelium and conidia of Trichodermasp., mycelium and conidia of Rhizoctonia sp.) in Petri dishes with potato glucose agar (PGA), Britania, in growth chamber at 25˚C ± 2˚C for 5 days.
2.2. Assessments
Assessments in dual culture trials were done according to what was proposed by Martínez and Solano (1995) [17], in Petri dishes of 9 cm of diameter with 15 ml of PDA (potato dextrosa agar) medium (Britania). The pH value of the medium was adjusted by adding NaOH (0.1 N) and HCI (0.1 N) before autoclave processing [6] and with further control after cooling (20˚C).
Treatments assessed were the combination of three pH values (5.5, 7 and 8.5) and four temperatures (10˚C, 15˚C, 25˚C and 35˚C).
At each end, it was sowed an agar disk of 5 mm of diameter with R. solani mycelium and, on the opposite end, the mycelium corresponding to the Trichoderma spp. strain to be assessed, at equal distance of the periphery and incubated at each condition of combined temperature and pH for 12 hours.
Five repetitions by treatment were done, which included control samples of R. solani and Trichoderma spp.
2.3. Variables Measured
- Radial growth: Disks of 5 mm of diameter with R. solani Kühn AG-3 and with each strain of Trichoderma were sowed in Petri plates containing PDA medium (Britania). The incubation conditions were the combination of different temperatures (10˚C, 15˚C, 25˚C, 35˚C) and pH (5.5, 7, 8.5). Measurements were taken up to 5 days after sowing. Results were expressed in mm·day−1 using the growth rate (GR) formula = (final growth - initial growth) × (incubation time)−1 [18].
- Percentage of radial growth inhibition (PRGI): for confirming the antibiotic effect of the isolations of Trichoderma spp. over R. solani. The PRGI was assessed in dual culture from the following 24 hours to the time physical contact was established between the antagonist and the pathogen [19]. The PRGI formula was used, PRGI = [(R1 − R2) × R1−1] × 100; where R1 is the radial growth of the control and R2 the radial growth of the pathogen in the treatments [20].
- Competence for substrate: assessments in dual cultures were done after 96 and 120 hours. Sorting as antagonist of each tested strain was carried out taking into account the five-grade class scale [21].
- Mycoparasitism: It was determined as the overgrowth of Trichoderma spp. in relation to the pathogen, at 5 days from the sowing and the occupied surface was established [22]. Results were expressed as a percentage of the area occupied by Trichoderma in relation to the area occupied by the pathogen.
To establish the type of hyphal interaction (adhesion, winding, penetration, vacuolation, cytoplasm granulation, lysis), sample observations were carried out from the area of interaction of both fungi in binocular optic microscope at 400× magnification.
2.4. Design and Statistical Analysis
The experiment was carried out under a completely randomized. Percentage values were transformed by calculating 2arcoÖp before the variance analysis. Grade 2 polynomial regression analysis was performed, where the significance of the quadratic and linear components was tested. The significance of the quadratic component would indicate the presence of an optimal and a minimum value, in relation to the percentage of inhibition and pH. Meanwhile, the significance of the lineal component (and the absence of a quadrant component) would indicate constant increments and decrements in the percentage of inhibition through the range of the pH examined. Analysis and visualizations of results were executed using the software R, version 3.2.2 [23].
3. Results
Based on the results (Figure 1), mycelial growth was observed in the Trichoderma strains tested at 15˚C and 25˚C and at all pH values (5.5, 7, 8.5). At 10˚C and 35˚C no growth was reported, regardless of pH. In general, growth was greater at 25˚C decreasing as pH was higher, except for T. longibrachiatum CBL1 and T. konigiopsis CBK2. While the strains T. ghanense CBGe1, T. harzianum CBH1, T. konigiopsis CBK6, T. ovalisporium CBO1, CBO2 and T. sulpureum CBS1, showed higher growth at 15˚C and at pH 5.5. It should be noted that the differential response in growth was dependent on the strain examined, more than on the Trichoderma species.
Regarding R. solani (Figure 2), no growth was observed at 10˚C and 35˚C. Greater values were achieved at 25˚C, rather than at 15˚C. This mycelial growth was not affected when varying pH conditions.
In dual growth trials (Table 1), by comparing the different strains of Trichodermaand R. solani, PRGI was, in general terms, lower at 15˚C and independent of pH. However, T. atroviride CBA3 and T. sulpureum CBS1 showed inhibition values significantly greater at pH 5.5 (7.6% of the tested strains). While 19.2% of the strains showed a trend for increasing the PRGI at lower pH (T. harzianum CBH3 and CBH4, T. konigiopsis CBK4 and CBK6, T. ovalisporium CBO2). At 25˚C, the observed behavior was similar, but more strains (15% of the tested strains) showed a greater PRGI at pH 5.5 (T. atroviride ACP8 and CBA3; T. harzianum CBH2 and CBH4; T. konigiopsis CBK3 and CBK4) and 27% of the strains evidenced greater PRGI with lower pH (T. clado-koningii CBCK1; T. harzianum CBH1, CBH3 and CBH4; T. longibrachiatum CBL1; T. ovalisporium
CBO3; T. sulpureum CBS1). It should be noted that T. atroviride CBA3 at 15 and 25˚C and pH 5.5 showed values of PRGI greater than 50%. Moreover, this same species, but CBA4 strain and T. konigiopsis CBK5, showed average values of inhibition of 32.6% and 31.9%, regardless of temperature and pH. Although T. virens CBVS1 evidenced a similar stable behavior, the inhibition percentage of R. solani was lower (4.6%). The differences between strains of Trichoderma in relation to the control mechanisms on R. solani, at the same temperature (25˚C) and different pH can be observed in Figure 3.
The capacity of the different strains to compete for the substrate at 25˚C and pH equal to 5.5 is shown in Table 2. According to the scale [21] at 96 hours after sowing, 88.5% of the tested strains grew over the pathogen, covering from 75% to 100% of the box surface (Class 1 and 2, respectively). The growth detention of both fungi (Class 3) was only observed in T. longibrachiatum CBL2 and T. gamsii CBG1. On the other hand, T. virens CBVs1 did not show any control effect over R. solani (Class 4). At 120 hours after sowing, 73% of the tested strains kept its competence for substrate capacity. It was kept even when time of the trial was extended.
The results of hyphal interaction with R. solani shown in Table 2 demonstrate that 96.2% of the strains under study revealed at least two types of mechanisms.
Percentage of radial growth inhibition of R. solani vs. different strains of Trichoderma at different conditions of temperature and pH
Species
Strain
PRGI (%)
Temperature 15˚C
Temperature 25˚C
pH: 5.5
pH: 7
pH: 8.5
pH: 5.5
pH: 7
pH: 8.5
T. atroviride
ACP8
35.2 bc
29.8 ab
28.2 a
41.8 c
32.5 ab
32.7 ab
CBA2
19.5 b
20.5 b
12.3 a
28.0 c
23.2 bc
20.7 b
CBA3
59.0 c
44.4 ab
45.5 ab
56.5 c
49.6 b
40.7 a
CBA4
30.1 a
30.9 a
30.3 a
35.4 a
33.7 a
35.2 a
CBA5
25.62 a
28.9 ab
22.1 a
38.6 c
38.7 c
33.3 bc
T. clado-koningii
CBCK1
19.9 ab
17.1 a
14.54 a
29.3 c
24.9 bc
20.4 ab
T. gamsii
CBG1
13.3 ab
16.2 b
7.3 a
16.0 b
15.4 b
9.6 ab
T. ghanense
CBGe1
31.6 ab
27.6 ab
25.5 a
32.5 b
29.5 ab
28.4 ab
T. harzianum
CBH1
22.3 ab
17.1 a
16.4 a
28.7 b
26.7 b
18.9 a
CBH2
23.7 a
19.8 a
19.2 a
33.9 b
25.5 a
20.1 a
CBH3
15.3 bc
12.2 ab
6.17 a
21.3 c
15.1 bc
12.2 ab
CBH4
22.3 bc
19.9 b
12.9 a
30.6 d
29.0 cd
21.4 b
T. konigiopsis
CBK1
19.0 abc
17.9 ab
13.9 a
25.17 c
23.1 bc
22.0 bc
CBK2
27.5 a
27.5 a
29.6 a
38.6 b
33.1 ab
34.0 ab
CBK3
30.1 cd
28.2 bcd
23.5 abc
30.5 d
22.8 ab
20.4 a
CBK4
31.6 cd
26.8 bc
17.4 a
36.6 d
26.8 bc
22.5 ab
CBK5
31.7 a
33.9 a
30.4 a
34.0 a
31.2 a
30.0 a
CBK6
30.2 bc
24.9 ab
21.3 a
34.6 c
34.9 c
31.3 bc
T. longibrachiatum
CBL1
26.4 abc
24.8 abc
22.1 a
31.3 c
29.4 bc
24.0 ab
CBL2
3.6 a
3.3 a
2.7 a
14.5 c
6.9 ab
11.9 bc
T. ovalisporium
CBO1
29.3 ab
22.6 a
24.1 ab
30.6 b
26.8 ab
23.9 ab
CBO2
38.2 b
32.3 ab
27.6 a
38.4 b
36.2 b
32.0 ab
CBO3
20.4 b
19.9 b
18.6 b
21.2 b
15.4 ab
11.7 a
T. sulpureum
CBS1
30.9 bc
22.7 a
21.3 a
33.2 c
30.2 bc
26.3 ab
T. viride
CBV1
25.7 ab
22.0 ab
24.8 ab
28.8 b
20.3 a
24.0 ab
T. virens
CBVS1
5.6 a
4.1 a
3.4 a
6.7 a
5.8 a
2.4 a
Only T. atroviride ACP8 and T. harzianum CBH2 evidenced the five types of hyphal interaction detected: winding, penetration, vacuolization, cytoplasm granulation and lysis. T. atroviride CBA3 and CBA5, T. ghanense CBG1, T. konigiopsis CBK2 and CBK4, T. ovalisporium CBO1 and CBO2, T. sulpureum CBS1 showed four types of hyphal interaction. Only T. virens CBvs1 did not show any type of interaction with the pathogen, in accordance with absence of growth over R. solani.
Competence for substrate and hyphal interaction of different strains of Trichodermaat 25˚C and pH 5.5
Species
Strain
Categories of Bell’s Scale
Overgrowth %
Hyphal Interaction
96 hours
120 hours
T. atroviride
ACP8
1
1
100
E-P-V-G-L
CBA2
2
1
100
E-L-V
CBA3
2
1
85
E-V-G-L
CBA4
1
1
100
E-L-V
CBA5
1
1
100
E-P-L-V
T. clado-koningii
CBCK1
1
1
70
L-V
T. gamsii
CBG1
3
3
20
L-V
T. ghanense
CBGe1
1
1
100
E-V-G-L
T. harzianum
CBH1
2
1
100
L-V
CBH2
1
1
100
E-P-V-G-L
CBH3
2
1
100
L-V
CBH4
1
1
100
E-V
T. konigiopsis
CBK1
2
1
100
E-L-V
CBK2
2
1
100
E-P-L-V
CBK3
1
1
100
E-L-V
CBK4
2
1
100
E-P-L-V
CBK5
1
1
100
E-L-V
CBK6
1
1
100
E-L-V
T. longibrachiatum
CBL1
2
2
75
L-V
CBL2
3
3
30
L-V
T. ovalisporium
CBO1
1
1
100
E-V-G-L
CBO2
1
1
100
E-V-G-L
CBO3
1
1
100
V-G
T. sulpureum
CBS1
1
1
100
E-V-G-L
T. viride
CBv1
2
2
100
L-V
T. virens
CBvs1
4
4
0
Without interaction
4. Discussion
The severe damage caused byR. solani in the potato production systems justifies the search for alternative control methods in the framework of a sustainability scheme. In this respect, Trichoderma has proven to be a cosmopolitan fungus, with high biological control activity over different phytopathogens [3]. Previous research proposes the inclusion of different species and strains of Trichoderma with variable results in the control of diseases, disregarding the effect of temperature and pH on the biopesticide-pathogen interaction mechanisms.
In this respect, studies carried out on pathogens other than R. solani have reported that the medium pH affects the growth and survival of Trichoderma [1] [6] [24]. In this regard, it has been reported that the mechanisms of biological control are maximized based on temperature, thus, improving the Trichoderma/phytopathogen interaction [25]. It is worth noting that both, temperature and pH are abiotic factors that determine the antagonist activity of Trichoderma [4].
According to our results, it was found that in 69% of the strains tested growth was greater at 25˚C, regardless of the pH value of the medium. This response is linked to the mesophilic nature of Trichoderma in accordance with that proposed by previous studies [4] [11]. The temperature range between 25˚C and 30˚C has been suggested for the greatest growth of Trichoderma [6] [9] [26] [27]. However, there are strains, such as T. viridae of Indian origin [28] and T. harzianum coming from Turkey [10] that show their greatest growth at temperature even higher than 40˚C. The isolations tested in our research did not evidence growth at the extreme temperatures tested (10˚C and 35˚C). According to the results obtained in the local isolations, the growth capacity was dependent on the strain, in consistency with what Küçük and Kivać (2004) [8] and Karaoglu et al. (2018) [10] reported for strains of other origins.
Although Trichoderma grows in a wide range of pH [4] [13] [29], this was not observed when pH was increased in the tested strains. In 50% of the cases, a decrease of growth was reported as pH was increased, at 25˚C. It should be noted that in 26% of the strains, growth increased under conditions of 15˚C and pH 5.5.
According to our results, it was generally observed a greater growth of Trichoderma at 25˚C and pH 5.5, depending on the degree of response more related to the tested strain than to the species.
With respect to the pH values, similar results were found by Abeyratne and Deshappriya (2018) [1] when testing Trichoderma over Fusarium spp. and Bhai et al. (2010) [24] over Phytophthoracapsici under warehouse conditions.
Likewise, the antagonist capacity of the different Trichoderma strains when faced toR. solani showed a higher PRGI value at 25˚C and pH 5.5. Favorable conditions in the growth medium would benefit Trichoderma and they would increase the production of metabolites and enzymes, since they promote the regulation of the genes involved in the biosynthesis [30] [31].
It should be highlighted that the strain behavior is a determinant factor since, as per our results, T. atroviride CBA4 (PRGI = 32.6%), T. konigiopsis CBK5 (PRGI = 31.9%) and T. virens CBvs1 (PRGI = 4.7%) kept their antagonistic capacity, regardless of the medium temperature and pH values.
In most of the tested strains, a pH value of 5.5 favored the control mechanisms over R. solani. This is due to the increase in the enzymatic activity that takes place on the cell wall [1] and to the increase in the production of volatile composites that suppress the growth of the pathogen [32].
It must be highlighted that a temperature of 25˚C and a pH value of 5.5 were not factors that, by themselves, decreased the growth of R. solani, since according to data reported by Raza et al. [33] and Ritchie et al. (2009) [34], such conditions would favor the mycelial growth and its survival.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, this study demonstrated a greater growth of Trichoderma at 25˚C and pH 5.5, depending on the degree of response more related to the tested strain than to the species. Under these conditions, the control mechanisms over R. solani were favored.
The response of each strain in relation to the variation of abiotic factors (temperature and pH) in the growth environment would enable us to understand the population dynamics and the degree of antagonism of each strain faced by R. solani, thus, allowing the identification of the most efficient strains in their growing medium. In relation to the above, it is also clear that certain strategies of edaphic fertilization induce changes in certain Trichoderma strains as a biopesticide of R. solani, associated with a modification in the pH value of the soil.
Acknowledgements
The authors express much thanks to the Chair of Phytopathology, Bioinput Transfer Center, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, National University of Córdoba.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Cite this paper
Andrés, P.A., Alejandra, P.M., Benedicto, M.C., Nahuel, R.I. and Clara, B.M. (2022) A Comparative Study of Different Strains of Trichoderma under Different Conditions of Temperature and pH for the Control of Rhizoctoniasolani. Agricultural Sciences, 13, 702-714. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2022.136046
ReferencesBenítez, T., Rincón, A.M., Limón, M.C. and Codon, A.C. (2004) Biocontrol Mechanisms of Trichoderma Strains. International Microbiology, 7, 249-260.AL-Saeedi, S.S. and Al-Ani, B.M. (2014) Study of Antagonistic Capability of Trichoderma harzianum Isolates against Some Pathogenic Soil Borne Fungi. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 5, 15-23.Hermosa, R., Rubio, M.B., Cardoza, R.E., Nicolás, C., Monte, E. and Gutiérrez, S. (2013) The Contribution of Trichoderma to Balancing the Costs of Plant Growth and Defense. International Microbiology, 16, 69-80.Hajieghrari, B., Torabi-Giglou, M., Mohammadi, M.R. and Davari, M. (2008) Biological Potential of Some Iranian Trichoderma Isolates in the Control of Soil Borne Plant Pathogenic Fungi. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7, 967-972.Montealegre, J., Valderrama, L., Herrera, R., Besoaín, X. and Pérez, L.M. (2009) Biocontrol Capacity of Wild and Mutant Trichoderma harzianum (Rifai) Strains on Rhizoctonia solani 618: Effect of Temperature and Soil Type during Storage. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 12, 2-3. https://doi.org/10.2225/vol12-issue4-fulltext-12Zehra, A., Dubey, M.K., Meena, M. and Upadhyay, R.S. (2017) Effect of Different Environmental Conditions on Growth and Sporulation of Some Trichoderma Species. Journal of Environmental Biology, 38, 197-203. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/38/2/MS-251Pérez, A.A., Pérez, M.A., Rollhaiser, I.N. and Martínez-Coca, B. (2020) Selección de Aislamientos de Trichoderma Spp. in Vitro como Potenciales Biofungicidas para el Control de Rhizoctonia solani Kühn en Papa. AgriScientia, 37, 21-33. https://doi.org/10.31047/1668.298x.v37.n2.29419Küçük, C. and Kivanç, M. (2004) Isolation of Trichoderma spp. and Determination of Their Antifungal, Biochemical and Physiological Features. Turkish Journal of Biology, 27, 247-253.Martínez B. Infante D. and Reyes Y. ,et al. (2013)Trichoderma spp. y su Función en el Control de Plagas en los Cultivos Revista de Protección Vegetal 28, 1-11.Karaoğlu, S.A., Bozdeveci, A. and Pehlivan, N. (2018) Characterization of Local Trichoderma spp. as Potential Bio-Control Agents, Screening of in Vitro Antagonistic Activities and Fungicide Tolerance. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 46, 247-261. https://doi.org/10.15671/HJBC.2018.233Kredics, L., Antal, Z., Manczinger, L., Szekeres, A., Kevei, F. and Nagy, E. (2003) Influence of Environmental Parameters on Trichoderma Strains with Biocontrol Potential. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 41, 37-42.Mukhopadhyay, R. and Kumar, D. (2020) Trichoderma: A Beneficial Antifungal Agent and Insights into Its Mechanism of Biocontrol Potential. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 30, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00333-xCoca B.M. ,et al. (2017)Bases Científico-Metodológicas para la Selección, Caracterización y Uso de Aislamientos de Trichoderma como Agente de Control Biológico del Tizón de la Vaina (Rhizoctonia solani Kühn) en Arroz Anales de la Academia de Ciencias de Cuba 1, 1-7.Abeyratne, G.D.D. and Deshappriya, N. (2018) The Effect of Ph on the Biological Control Activities of a Trichoderma sp. against Fusarium sp. Isolated from the Commercial Onion Fields in Sri Lanka. Tropical Plant Research, 5, 121-128. https://doi.org/10.22271/tpr.2018.v5.i2.017Xiong, H., von Weymarn, N., Leisola, M. and Turunen, O. (2004) Influence of pH on the Production of Xylanases by Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30. Process Biochemistry, 39, 731-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00178-XHamrouni, R., Molinet, J., Miché, L., Carboué, Q., Dupuy, N., Masmoudi, A. and Roussos, S. (2019) Production of Coconut Aroma in Solid-State Cultivation: Screening and Identification of Trichoderma Strains for 6-Pentyl-Alpha-Pyrone and Conidia Production. Journal of Chemistry, 2019, Article ID: 8562384. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8562384Nelson P.E., Toussoun, T.A. and Marasas, W. (1983) Fusarium Species, an Illustrated Manual for Identification. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park and London, 193 p.Martínez, B. and Solano, T. (1995) Antagonismo de Trichoderma spp. Frente a Alternaria solani (Ellis y Martin) Jones y Grout. Revista Protección Vegetal, 10, 221-225.Guigón-López, C., Guerrero-Prieto, V., Vargas-Albores, F., Carvajal-Millán, E., ávila-Quezada, G.D., Bravo-Luna, L. and Lorito, M. (2010) Identificación Molecular de Cepas Nativas de Trichoderma spp. su Tasa de Crecimiento in Vitro y Antagonismo Contra Hongos Fitopatógenos. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, 28, 87-96.Pérez-Torres, E., Bernal-Cabrera, A., Milanés-Virelles, P., Sierra-Reyes, Y., Leiva-Mora, M., Marín-Guerra, S. and Monteagudo-Hernández, O. (2018) Eficiencia de Trichoderma harzianum (cepa a-34) y sus filtrados en el control de tres enfermedades fúngicas foliares en arroz. Bioagro, 30, 17-26.Samaniego-Fernández, L.M., Harouna, M., Corbea, O., Rondón-Castillo, A.J. and Placeres-Espinosa, I. (2018) Aislamiento, Identificación y Evaluación de Cepas Autóctonas de Trichoderma spp. Antagonistas de Patógenos del Suelo. Revista de Protección Vegetal, 33, 3.Bell, D.K., Wells, H.D. and Markham, C.R. (1982) In Vitro Antagonism of Trichoderma Species against Six Fungal Plant Pathogens [Biological Disease Control]. Phytopathology, 72, 379-382. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-72-379Infante, D., Reyes, Y., Gonzalez, N. and Martínez, B. (2013) Molecular Identification of Thirteen Isolates of Trichoderma spp. and Evaluation of Their Pathogenicity towards Rhizoctonia solani Kühn. Biotecnología aplicada, 30, 23-28.R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.orgBhai, R.S., Raj, S. and Kumar, A. (2010) Influence of Soil Ph and Moisture on the Biocontrol Potential of Trichoderma harzianum on Phytophthora capsici-Black Pepper System. Journal of Biological Control, 24, 153-157.Zin, N.A. and Badaluddin, N.A. (2020) Biological Functions of Trichoderma spp. for Agriculture Applications. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, 65, 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2020.09.003Eneyskaya, E.V., Kulminskaya, A.A., Savel’Ev, A.N., Savel’Eva, N.V., Shabalin, K.A. and Neustroev, K.N. (1999) Acid Protease from Trichoderma reesei: Limited Proteolysis of Fungal Carbohydrases. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 52, 226-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051513Asad, S.A., Ali, N., Hameed, A., Khan, S.A., Ahmad, R., Bilal, M. and Tabassum, A. (2014) Biocontrol Efficacy of Different Isolates of Trichoderma against Soil Borne Pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Polish Journal of Microbiology, 63, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2014-014Zope, V.P., Jadhav, H.P. and Sayyed, R.Z. (2019) Neem Cake Carrier Prolongs Shelf Life of Biocontrol Fungus Trichoderma viridae. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 57, 372-375.Peñalva, M.A. and Arst Jr., H.N. (2004) Recent Advances in the Characterization of Ambient pH Regulation of Gene Expression in Filamentous Fungi and Yeast. Annual Review of Microbiology, 58, 425-451. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123715Grešík, M., Kolarova, N. and Farkaš, V. (1991) Hyperpolarization and Intracellular Acidification in Trichoderma viride as a Response to Illumination. Microbiology, 137, 2605-2609. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-137-11-2605Moreno-Mateos, M.A., Delgado-Jarana, J., Codon, A.C. and Benítez, T. (2007) pH and Pac1 Control Development and Antifungal Activity in Trichoderma harzianum. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 44, 1355-1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2007.07.012Raza, W., Faheem, M., Yousaf, S., Rajer, F.U. and Yamin, M. (2013) Volatile and Non-Volatile Antifungal Compounds Produced by Trichoderma harzianum SQR-T037 Suppressed the Growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum. Science Letters, 1, 21-24.Ritchie, F., Bain, R.A. and McQuilken, M.P. (2009) Effects of Nutrient Status, Temperature and pH on Mycelial Growth, Sclerotial Production and Germination of Rhizoctonia solani from Potato. Journal of Plant Pathology, 91, 589-596.