<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Environmental Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-2197</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2022.136024</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEP-117788</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Elemental Composition of PM&lt;sub&gt;2.5&lt;/sub&gt; and PM&lt;sub&gt;10&lt;/sub&gt; in the Industrial Area of Yopougon, Abidjan, C&#244;te d’Ivoire
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alloman</surname><given-names>Joseph Popouen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdelfettah</surname><given-names>Benchrif</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ponaho</surname><given-names>Claude Kezo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Djama</surname><given-names>Djoman Alfred Agbo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aka</surname><given-names>Antonin Koua</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moussa</surname><given-names>Bounakhla</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alain</surname><given-names>Georges Monnehan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>National Centre for Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology (CNESTEN), Direction of Studies and Scientific Researches, Rabat, Morocco</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratoire des Sciences de la Mati&amp;amp;egrave;re, de l’Environnement et de l’Energie Solaire, Universit&amp;amp;eacute; F&amp;amp;eacute;lix Houphou&amp;amp;euml;t Boigny, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Laboratoire des Sciences et Technologies de l’Environnement, Universit&amp;amp;eacute; Jean Lorougnon Gu&amp;amp;eacute;d&amp;amp;eacute;, Daloa, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Autorit&amp;amp;eacute; de Radioprotection, de S&amp;amp;ucirc;ret&amp;amp;eacute; et S&amp;amp;eacute;curit&amp;amp;eacute; Nucl&amp;amp;eacute;aires, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>06</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>385</fpage><lpage>397</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>7,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>14,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This paper describes the evaluation of trace element composition of atmospheric aerosol particles (PM
  <sub>2.5</sub> and PM
  <sub>10</sub>) and their influence on air quality in the largest industrial area of Abidjan city, C&#244;te d’Ivoire. Multi-week sampling was conducted in an urban site (industrial area) in Abidjan from April 2018 to July 2019. The mean mass concentration was 48.83 &#177; 15.24 μg/m
  <sup>3</sup> for PM
  <sub>2.5</sub> and 77.34 &#177; 10.91 μg/m
  <sup>3</sup> for PM
  <sub>10</sub>, with significant temporal variability. The average ratio of PM
  <sub>2.5</sub>/PM
  <sub>10</sub> was 0.64 &#177; 0.21. The concentration of BC in PM
  <sub>2.5</sub> and PM
  <sub>10</sub> was respectively 52.32 &#177; 7.48 μg/m
  <sup>3</sup> and 52.26 &#177; 12.07 μg/m
  <sup>3</sup>. Twenty-two elements: Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Rb, Sr, Zr and Pb were analysed by Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF). Elemental composition data were modeled using principal component analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation to determine two (2) and four (4) dominant source categories contributing to PM
  <sub>2.5</sub> and PM
  <sub>10</sub> respectively. In the case of fine particles PM
  <sub>2.5</sub>, the possible sources were Industrial activities and non-exhaust emissions, exhaust emissions. The PM
  <sub>10</sub> sources were industrial activities and non-exhaust emissions, industrial processes, mineral dust, and waste combustion.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Aerosol Particles</kwd><kwd> PM&lt;sub&gt;2.5&lt;/sub&gt;</kwd><kwd> PM&lt;sub&gt;10&lt;/sub&gt;</kwd><kwd> EDXRF</kwd><kwd> PCA</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Atmospheric particulate matter pollution is one of the main issues of public concern worldwide. The rapid industrialization and urban growth had been the major reasons for the frequent violation of the ambient particulate matter concentration standards, particularly in developing countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref1">1</xref>]. Particulate matter is introduced into the ambient air from a variety of natural and anthropogenic sources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref2">2</xref>] leading to the deterioration of air quality and environmental degradation. It is known as a major component of this pollution and is one of the most concerning pollutants because of its strong impact on human health. Indeed, exposure to particulate matter can result in adverse human health problems such as acute respiratory illness, chronic cough and reduced lung function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>It is important to study the chemical composition of atmospheric particulate matter because of its effects on human health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref5">5</xref>] and climate change [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref7">7</xref>]. In addition, such studies provide information on the origins of the particulate material and can reveal whether it was emitted as primary or secondary particles. Smaller particles can penetrate more deeply into the lungs than larger ones and thus cause more severe harm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref8">8</xref>]. In addition, fine particulate matter affects the radiation balance of the earth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref9">9</xref>] because it scatters and absorbs much of the incident visible light from the sun.</p><p>Coarse particles (PM<sub>10</sub>) usually contain materials from the earth’s crust and dust from vehicles and industrial plants, while fine particles contain the secondary formed aerosols, combustion particles, and re-condensed organic and metallic vapours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref10">10</xref>]. Black carbon (BC) is one of the main-anthropogenic components of particulate air pollution, being produced by incomplete combustion. When it is formed, it is invariably mixed with other atmospheric constituents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref11">11</xref>]. Generally, there are two important reasons for determining the elemental content in airborne particulate matter. First, it can contain heavy elements such as Cd, Pb, As and Sb, which are toxic to human health. It is of interest to follow the eco cycles of these metals as environmental hazards once they have been released into the atmosphere, biosphere and technosphere. The second aspect is that single elements or ratios of different elements can be used to fingerprint and monitor emissions from specific sources.</p><p>The results of previous studies in C&#244;te d’Ivoire showed that the air quality situation in Abidjan was worrying, as the major cities of West Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate trace elemental concentrations in particles (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>) and to investigate their influence on local air quality. Thus, it will improve our knowledge of air quality associated with PM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref13">13</xref>] in Abidjan.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sampling</title><p>The sampling campaign was conducted at the industrial site of Yopougon with an area of 153 km<sup>2</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref14">14</xref>]. This measurement site (red dot) corresponds to GPS the coordinates 5˚23'18&quot; North and 4˚4'35&quot; West (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The collection of particles was carried out three times a week with LVS/LV-S6-RV Sven Leckel sampler, from April 2018 to July 2019 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref13">13</xref>]. The meteorological parameters including temperature, relative humidity and wind speed were provided by the Soci&#233;t&#233; d’Exploitation et de D&#233;veloppement A&#233;rportuaire, A&#233;ronautique et de M&#233;t&#233;orologique-Cote d’ivoire (SODEXAM).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Analysis</title><p>PM concentrations were determined by gravimetric mean. Black carbon measurements were performed using an EEL Smoke Stain reflectometer (Model 43 M, Diffusion Systems Ltd 43) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. A light is source shines its light on the filter, and the reflected light is measured by photocells located in a black housing. The reflector reading is obtained directly from the universal digital readout and converted to output voltage. Both methods used are described elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref13">13</xref>]. The particulate matter collected on the filters was quantitatively analyzed for trace elements by an Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) spectrometer of type X-123 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). This spectrometer is composed of a fast SDD detector (25 mm diameter and 130 eV resolution), a mini X-ray tube with silver anode (30 kV and 25 &#181;A), an excitation and emergence angle of 67.5˚, an X-ray tube-sample distance of 33.9 mm and a 15.9 mm detector-sample. The samples were irradiated during 300 seconds and the obtained X-ray spectra were processed using the XRS-FP software of CrossRoads Scientific Company. Then, the elemental contents given in &#181;g/g were converted into airbone concentrations in &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>. This EDXRF method gives elemental concentrations with a typical error margin of 10%, which includes statistical counting errors of the detected elements in the sample. Twenty-two elements, namely Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Rb, Sr, Zr and Pb were detected and quantified.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation was used to estimate and identify the possible sources of coarse and fine particles. Thus, the chemical elements with higher concentrations in each factor were interpreted as fingerprints of emission source that it represents. In the present study, SPSS software was used to perform multivariate factor analysis.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussions</title><p>This environmental study focused on the trace elements concentrations level of the PM and emission sources. But the influence of the meteorological parameters and BC content will also be discussed</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Concentration Level of Particulate Matter (PM) and BC</title><p>The mean values concentration of fine (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and coarse (PM<sub>10</sub>) particulates fractions were 48.83 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup> and 77.34 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup> respectively. The corresponding highest concentration was equal to 96.5 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup> and 94.1 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>. The time serie plots of the particulate matter (PM) in both size particles and their respective content in BC are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p><p>From the beginning of the great rainy season (May 2018) until October 2018, the fine particles showed an inverted behaviour to that observed for coarse particles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). After this period, the fine particles increased and reached one significant peak at the beginning of the great dry season (December 2018) with a concentration of 93.5 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>. Thereafter it decreased considerably until almost at the end of the great rainy season (June 2019 37.64 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>) before increasing slightly.</p><p>A variation of BC in both sizes (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>) was observed during the study period. A considerable peak of BC was recorded in PM<sub>10</sub> in December 2018 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). This could be justified by the industrial stacks releases into the air during this period of the year.</p><p>The times series plot indicated that the monthly concentrations of PM<sub>10</sub> increased during the great rainy season (May 2018 to July 2018) samplings, decreased significantly from August 2018 to September 2018, followed by a slight increase at the beginning of the small rainy season. This seasonal trend could be attributed, in part, to the meteorological conditions. It was found that the higher values of PM<sub>10</sub> corresponded to lower temperatures and higher wind speed values and vice versa except for April 2019 to May 2019 where PM<sub>10</sub>, temperature and wind speed had the same evolution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> presents the results of PM studies of some African cities. The PM values found in these studies exceeded largely the WHO standards (PM<sub>2.5</sub>: 15 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>/24h; PM<sub>10</sub>: 45 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>/24h) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref15">15</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> levels of C&#244;te d’Ivoire (Abidjan) and some of other African countries</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Country</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type of site</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study periode</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PM<sub>2.5</sub> (&#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PM<sub>10</sub> (&#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reference</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C&#244;te d’Ivoire (Abidjan)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Industrial area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >April 2018 to July 2019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The present study</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Senegal (Dakar)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urban/industrial area (Hlm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2018-2019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >246.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moustapha kebe et al., 2021 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref16">16</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria (Abuja)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Industrial area (M1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >May 2011 to April 2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >341.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lasun T. Ogundele et al., 2016 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref17">17</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>It can be noted that the values of our study are lower than those found in these different African countries, but they remain higher than the international standards [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref15">15</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Elemental Concentration in Particulate Matter</title><p>The elemental compositions, their average concentrations in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> and standard deviations are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Thirteen elements were determined for all the samples in coarse and fine particles. The average concentrations of these elements ranged from 0.0010 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup> for Zr in PM<sub>2.5</sub> to 0.487 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup> for Ca in PM<sub>10</sub>.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> shows the concentrations level of the elements detected in fine and coarse particles at the industrial area of Yopougon, Abidjan. For both fine and coarse particles, Zr was the element with the lowest concentration (0.0010 &#177; 0.0005 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>). However, the highest concentration was recorded for K (0.202 &#177; 0.080 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>) in fine particles and Ca (0.487 &#177; 0.188 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>) in coarse particles. A comparison of the metal concentrations in both particles indicated that the elements of crustal origin (Al, K, Ca, Mn and Zr) were more prevalent in PM<sub>10</sub> than PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Whole, the elements from anthropogenic sources (Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn and Pb) were less prevalent in fine particulates.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Multivariate Analysis</title><p>To further assess dominant source categories and quantify their contributions for coarse and fine aerosols, the principal component analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation was used. For coarse fraction (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), four principal components (PCs) were extracted that, accounting for over 83% of the explained variance. The PCA results of PM<sub>10</sub> showed that the first factor (PC1), with the maximum percentage of variance (27.18%), had high loadings of Mn, Cl, BC, Cu, Zr and Pb. PC1 could show a combined contribution of industrial activities and non-exhaust emissions. This factor includes the contribution from vehicle non-exhaust sources traced by Mn and Cu, but it also receives significant mass contributions by combustion species like BC and Cl. BC can be found in combustion emissions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref19">19</xref>] and Cl can be considered as an elemental tracer for coal combustion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref20">20</xref>] and industrial activities mainly composed of Zr and Pb which reflects the influence of ceramic industry processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref21">21</xref>]. PC2 mainly consisted of Zn, Ni, and Pb with 21.23% of the total variance, which was recommended as fingerprints for the metal processing industry. Oliveira et al pointed out industrial sources that had a strong contribution from Zn, Pb and Mn could be related to waste incineration or metallurgy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref22">22</xref>]. PC3 showed a high loadings of Ca, Al, K, and Fe elements with a crustal origin, and explained 18.37% of the total variance. This factor is interpreted as a mixture of several sources including soil resuspension, urban works and regional mineral dust. PC4 explained 17.06% of the variance with high loadings of S, Cr and K. It would point out the role of waste combustion sources typically burning of woods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref23">23</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The mean and standard deviations of elemental concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> collected at Yopougon industrial area from May 2018 to July 2019</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Elements</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >PM<sub>2.5</sub> (&#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >PM<sub>10</sub> (&#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S.D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S.D</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al S Cl K Ca Cr Mn Fe Ni Cu Zn Zr Pb BC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010 0.026 0.024 0.202 0.103 0.018 0.010 0.052 0.004 0.003 0.156 0.0010 0.010 52.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003 0.009 0.006 0.080 0.040 0.006 0.003 0.020 0.001 0.001 0.060 0.0005 0.003 7.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022 0.070 0.302 0.306 0.487 0.024 0.015 0.106 0.005 0.005 0.235 0.002 0.013 52.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010 0.030 0.110 0.099 0.188 0.007 0.004 0.040 0.001 0.001 0.090 0.001 0.005 12.07</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*S.D. is Standard Deviation.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Principal component analysis with varimax rotation for PM<sub>10</sub> dataset from Yopougon area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Element</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Factor</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.795</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.272</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.322</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.816</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.232</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.385</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.844</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.795</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.241</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.448</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.338</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.616</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.613</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.229</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.838</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.253</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.303</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.834</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.804</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.395</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.167</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.052</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.475</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.557</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.611</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.075</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.349</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.784</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.064</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.327</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.713</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.490</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.181</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.949</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.056</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.093</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.713</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.313</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.125</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.627</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.656</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.058</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of variance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cumulative %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Source</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Industrial activities and Non−exhaust emissions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Industrial processes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mineral dust</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waste combustion</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>For PM<sub>2.5</sub>, two principal components (PCs) were extracted by PCA analysis, accounting for over 81% of the explained variance. The PCA results of PM<sub>2.5</sub> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>) showed that the first factor (PC1), with the maximum percentage of variance (66.85%), had high loadings of Al, S, Cl, K, Ca, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Zr, and Pb. This factor looked like a combination of different sources, according to their characteristic tracers, as Non-exhaust (Pb, Zn), Industry (Cu, Ni, and Cr), Combustion (S, Ni) and Crustal (Al, Fe) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref24">24</xref>]. Therefore, this factor 1 could be assigned to sources such as scrap packaging, stainless steel, ceramics, electronic products, mechanical wear of electrical components, vehicles parts and metal parts of used equipment. The second factor, which explains 14.42% of the total variance, was strongly correlated with the BC. This factor originated from exhaust emissions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117788-ref26">26</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Principal component analysis with varimax rotation for PM<sub>2.5</sub> dataset from Yopougon area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Element</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Factor</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.880</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.827</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.461</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.828</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.061</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.874</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.405</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.897</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.288</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.820</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.846</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.439</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.792</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.303</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.844</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.417</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.838</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.080</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.892</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.192</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.867</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.049</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.820</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.465</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.880</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.240</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of variance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cumulative %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Source</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Industrial activities and Non−exhaust emissions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exhaust emissions</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>This study took place in the economic capital of C&#244;te d’Ivoire, Abidjan. The measurement campaign was performed during the years 2018 and 2019. PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples were collected three times per week. The elemental composition of the PM samples was determined using EDXRF. The elements that presented the highest concentrations were Ca, K, Cl, Zn and Fe. All these elements originated mainly from natural sources, except for K and Zn which could be soil components but could also be emitted from biomass burning.</p><p>Time series analysis of particulate matter revealed a seasonal trend with high concentrations during the end of the short dry season and the beginning of the great dry season period. The contents of chemical elements indicated that Zr was the element that showed the lowest concentrations for both fractions. However, Ca presented the highest concentrations in coarse particles and K the highest values in the fine particles. Using the Principal Component Analysis (PCA), four and two factors were obtained for coarse and fine particles respectively. The identified sources for fine and coarse particulates were respectively industrial activities and non-exhaust, exhaust emissions, and mineral dust and waste combustion. After the identification of the sources, further studies will be necessary to quantify the contribution of each source.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are grateful to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA, Vienna-Austria) for this work within the framework of the RAF7016 regional project for providing equipment and training and also to the Nuclear Research Center of Algier for the analysis of our sampled filters. The authors express gratitude to the East-Yopougon Departmental Direction of Health and also to the Direction of the Health Centre near the Abidjan Prison (MACA), where the sampler was located during the sampling campaign.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Popouen, A.J., Benchrif, A., Kezo, P.C., Agbo, D.D.A., Koua, A.A., Bounakhla, M. and Monnehan, A.G. (2022) Elemental Composition of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> in the Industrial Area of Yopougon, Abidjan, C&#244;te d’Ivoire. Journal of Environmental Protection, 13, 385-397. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2022.136024</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.117788-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dey, S., Gupta, S. and Uma, M. (2014) Study of Particulate Matter, Heavy Metals and Gasoues Pollutants at Gopalpur at Tropical Industrial Site in Eastern India. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, 8, 1-13. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jestft/papers/vol8-issue2/Version-1/A08210113.pdf https://doi.org/10.9790/2402-08210113</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Srimuruganandam, B. and Nagenrda, S.M.S. (2012) Application of Positive Matrix Factorization in Characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 Emission Sources at Urban Roadside. Chemosphere, 88, 120-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.02.083</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hutchison, G.R., Brown, D.M., Hibbs, L.R., Heal, M.R., Donaldson, K., Maynard, R.L., Monaghan, M., Nicholl, A. and Stone, V. (2005) The Effect of Refurbishing a UK Steel Plant on PM10 Metal Composition and Ability to Induce Inflammation. Respiratory Research, 6, 622-632. https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-43</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ito, K., Christensen, W.F., Eatough, J.D., Henry, R.C., Kim, E., Laden, F., Lall, F., Larson, T.V., Neas, L., Hopke, P.K. and Thurston, G.D. (2006) PM Source Apportionment and Health Effects 2. An Investigation of Intermethod Variability in Associations between Source-Apportioned Fine Particle Mass and Daily Mortality in Washington, DC. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 16, 300-310. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500464</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Renwick, L.C., Donaldson, K. and Clouter, A. (2001) Impairment of Alveolar Macrophage Phagocytosis by Ultrafine Particles. Toxicology Applied Pharmacology, 172, 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1006/taap.2001.9128</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karl, T.R., Nicholls, N. and Gregory, J. (1997) The Coming Climate. Scientific American, 276, 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0597-78</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cahill, T.A. (1996) Climate Forcing by Anthropogenic Aerosols: The Role for PIXE. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 109-110, 402-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(95)00944-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwartz, J. and Neas, L. (2000) Fine Particles Are More Strongly Associated than Coarse Particles with Acute Respiratory Health Effects in Schoolchildren. Epidemiology, 11, 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-200001000-00004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Horvath, H. (1998) Influence of Atmospheric Aerosols upon the Global Radiation Balance. In: Harrison, R.M. and Van Grieken, R.E., Eds., Atmospheric Particles, Wiley, Chichester, 543-596.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jacobson, M.Z. (2002) Atmospheric Pollution: History, Science and Regulation. Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802287</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liousse, C., Cachier, H. and Jennings, S.G. (1993) Optical and Thermal Measurements of Black Carbon Aerosol Content in Different Environments-Variation of the Specific Attenuation Cross-Section, Sigma (σ). Atmospheric Environment, Part A, 27, 1203-1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90246-U</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Djossou, J., Léon, J.F. and Barthélemy, A.A. (2018) Mass Concentration, Optical Depth and Carbon Composition of Particulate Matter in the Major Southern West African Cities of Cotonou (Benin) and Abidjan (C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire). Atmospheric Chemistry Physics, 18, 6275-6291. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6275-2018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Popouen, A.J., Djagouri, K., Agbo, D.A., Koua, A.A. and Monnehan, A.G. (2021) Concentration Levels of PM2.5, PM10 and Black Carbon in the Industrial Area of Yopougon, Abidjan, C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire. International Journal of Physics, 9, 90-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Madina, D., N’Datchoh, E., Toure, S.S., Véronique, Y., Arona, D. and Célestin, H. (2018) Emissions from the Road Traffic of West African Cities: Assessment of Vehicle Fleet and Fuel Consumption. Energies, 11, 2300. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092300</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2021) Global Air Quality Guidelines. Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10), Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide. World Health Organization, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kebe, M., Traore, A., Manousakas, M.I., Vasilatou, V., Ndao, A.S., Wague, A. and Eleftheriadis, K. (2021) Source Apportionment and Assessment of Air Quality Index of PM2.5-10 and PM2.5 in at Two Different Sites in Urban Background Area in Senegal. Atmosphere, 11, 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020182</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ogundele, L.T., Owoade, O.K., Olise, F.S. and Hopke, P.K. (2016) Source Identification and Apportionment of PM2.5 and PM2.5-10 in Iron and Steel Scrap Smelting Factory Environment Using PMF, PCFA and UNMIX Receptor Models. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188, 574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5585-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zheng, M., Salmon, L.G., Schauer, J.J., Zeng, L., Kiang, C.S., Zhang, Y., et al. (2005) Seasonal Trends in PM2.5 Source Contributions in Beijing, China. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 3967-3976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Song, Y., Xie, S., Zhang, Y., Zeng, L., Salmon, L. and Zheng, M. (2006) Source Apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing Using Principal Component Analysis/Absolute Principal Component Scores and UNMIX. Science of the Total Environment, 372, 278-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.08.041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tang, Y.-B., Li, Z.-H., Yang, Y.I., Ma, D.-J. and Ji, H.-J. (2015) Effect of Inorganic Chloride on Spontaneous Combustion of Coal. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 115, 87-92. https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2015/v115n2a1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Querol, X., Minguillón, M.C., Alastuey, A., Monfort, E., Mantilla, E., Sanz, M.J., Sanz, F., Roig, A., Renau, A., Felis, C., Miró, J.V. and Artí&amp;ntilde;ano, B. (2007) Impact of the Implementation of PM Abatement Technology on the Ambient Air Levels of Metals in a Highly Industrialised Area. Atmospheric Environment, 41, 1026-1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.09.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliveira, L.N., Duarte, E.R., Nogueira, F., Silva, R.B., Faria Filho, D.E. and Geraseev, L.C. (2010) Efficacy of Banana Crop Residues on the Inhibition of Larval Development in Haemonchus spp. from Sheep. Ciencia Rural, 40, 458-460. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782009005000254</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B&amp;lstrok;aszczak, B. (2018) The Use of Principal Component Analysis for Source Identification of PM2.5 from Selected Urban and Regional Background Sites in Poland. E3S Web of Conferences, 28, Article No. 01001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20182801001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kermani, M., Jonidi Jafari, A., Gholami, M., et al. (2021) Characterization, Possible Sources and Health Risk Assessment of PM2.5-Bound Heavy Metals in the Most Industrial City of Iran. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 19, 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-020-00589-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Song, S., Wu, Y., Zheng, X., Wang, Z., Yang, L., Li, J. and Hao, J. (2014) Chemical Characterization of Roadside PM2.5 and Black Carbon in Macao during a Summer Campaign. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 3, 381-387. https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2014.044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117788-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Z., Shi, X., Ma, Y. and Wei, X. (2020) Variation Characteristics of Mass Concentration of Inhalable Particles in Qingdao, China. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 8, 192-201. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2020.810014</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>