<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MSCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-6045</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/msce.2022.105004</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MSCE-117567</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Machinability of Polymeric Composites and Future Reinforcements—A Review
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdullah</surname><given-names>Shalwan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Talal</surname><given-names>Alsaeed</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Belal</surname><given-names>Yousif</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Centre of Excellence in Engineered Fiber Composites (CEEFC), Faculty of Engineering and Surveying, University Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Manufacturing Engineering Technology, The Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Kuwait City, Kuwait</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>05</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>40</fpage><lpage>72</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>26,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This paper reviews the machinability and mechanical properties of natural
   fiber-reinforced composites. Coupling agents, operating parameters, as well as chemical treatment effects on natural fiber-reinforced composites’ machinability are also reviewed. Moreover, the impacts of fibers’ physical properties on the machinability of the composite are mentioned. Fiber volume fraction (V<sub>f</sub>), fiber orientation as well as chemical treatment effects on mechanical properties are also defined. Conclusively, the effect of fibers’ physical properties as well as mechanical properties is described. It was discovered that chemical treatment of natural fibers improved their compatibility with the matrix by removing their surface tissues, increasing the roughness average (Ra), and reducing moisture absorption. Also, the Orientation of the fiber plays an important role in controlling the mechanical properties of the composite. Moreover, some physical properties of the fibers, including quality of fiber distributed in the matrix; fiber size, length, and diameter; moisture absorption; porosity and the way fibers break during compounding with the matrix, were found to affect the mechanical properties of the composites formed.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Machinability</kwd><kwd> Natural Fiber</kwd><kwd> Composites</kwd><kwd> Chemical Treatment</kwd><kwd> Operating Parameters</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Polymeric composites nowadays are gradually being utilized in some industrial applications for replacing metals as well as metal composites, which is a positive development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref2">2</xref>]. For example, some metal components of aircraft were also replaced with carbon/epoxy composite components. The use of fiber/polymer composites in marine applications has also been discovered; numerous metal parts are also being replaced with fiber/polymer composites in ships. According to Hung et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref3">3</xref>], suitable tools in a conventional machining procedure are also required for machining metal matrix composites. Synthetic fiber composites, including carbon fiber and glass fiber composites, on the other hand, present a significant challenge due to the fibers’ refractoriness, extreme hardness, as well as inert nature to machinability in terms of their bearing strength, material removal rate, thrust force, cutting power, Ra (roughness average), and delamination size. Anisotropic and Heterogeneous properties are present in them [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref6">6</xref>]. Moreover, abrasive properties of synthetic fibers cause poor surface finish as well as rapid tool wear [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>To ensure the effectiveness of the machining procedure, this is essential that the cutting parameters, as well as the tool, are chosen correctly. Nevertheless, several researchers reported that over the past few years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref9">9</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref20">20</xref>], the machining parameters’ effect for example V<sub>f</sub>, fiber orientation, drill diameter, speed, and feed have a significant impact on such materials’ machinability. It has been found, however, that less work was done on natural fiber-reinforced composite materials’ machinability for machining power, cutting pressure, tool life, cutting power and force, material removal rate, cutting forces, Ra, along with tool wear than has been done on synthetic materials’ machinability. It is now widely recognized that synthetic fibers are extremely rough materials, which can cause important damage to machining tools as well as machines. Fibers are hair-like class materials that can be separate or continuous. It can be categorized into 2 main types: synthetic and natural. Natural fibers, namely plants, minerals, and animals, come from 3 major sources. Natural plant fibers have been used for protection and warmth for the first time more than 5000 years ago. In particular, because of the rise in synthetic fibers, the natural fibers sector lost the majority of its market share after World War II [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref21">21</xref>]. Synthetic fibers are having a serious negative impact on process machining and manufacturing, including high energy consumption, non-recyclability, high cost, non-renewability, along with high abrasiveness, CO<sub>2</sub> emission, along health problems when inhaled. Such limitations were greatly utilized by the supporters of natural fibers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref24">24</xref>].</p><p>Numerous researchers are now working on replacing synthetic fibers with natural fibers to comply with new environmental regulations as well as petroleum resource depletion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref27">27</xref>]. In 2006, the “United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization declared 2009 the international year of natural fibers”. This year’s campaign was focused on enhancing global awareness of natural fiber and market demand [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref30">30</xref>]. Due to their higher characteristics, like renewability, abundance, low cost, non-toxicity, low weight, non-abrasiveness, biodegradability, low environmental effect, as well as CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, many efforts have been made over the last few years (2005-2021) to use natural fibers (nature fibers) to enhance polymer composites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref35">35</xref>]. In addition, natural fibers are a commodity based on prices, causing less damage to the equipment and molding, a better finish, flexibility, and high energy consumption (bending instead of fracturing) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref36">36</xref>]. Furthermore, the special surface micromorphology and low-cost benefits of each fiber, which also grew rapidly around the world to the detriment of synthetic products, have attracted the most significant benefits to the market for natural fibers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref39">39</xref>]. However, the “low melting point, poor wettability, low resistance to moisture absorption, and lack of good interfacial adhesion” that results in debonding with age, have been identified as the main disadvantages of natural fibers that make them a less attractive option [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref40">40</xref>].</p><p>In polymeric composites, a variety of plant fibers extracted from a variety of plants were utilized as reinforcements, including palm tree fibers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref42">42</xref>], flax [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref43">43</xref>], hemp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref44">44</xref>], jute [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref43">43</xref>], wood fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref40">40</xref>], rice husks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref45">45</xref>], wheat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref47">47</xref>], barley [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref47">47</xref>], oats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref47">47</xref>], agave [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref48">48</xref>], cane (sugar and bamboo) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref50">50</xref>], vakka [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref42">42</xref>], kenaf [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref51">51</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref52">52</xref>], ramie [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref53">53</xref>], oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref54">54</xref>], sisal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref55">55</xref>], coir [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref56">56</xref>], bamboo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref57">57</xref>], roselle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref55">55</xref>], banana fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref58">58</xref>] and pineapple leaf fiber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>Most of the studies that have been done on natural fibers in polymeric composites were done for investigating natural fibers’ effects on the electrical, thermal, dynamical, tribological, mechanical, physical properties of polymeric composites. Fiber composite’s mechanical properties depend on several parameters, for example, composite structure, fiber’s mechanical and physical properties, fibers’ V<sub>f</sub>, fiber’s surface characteristics (for interfacial adhesion), as well as fiber orientation. The impacts of every parameter on composites’ mechanical properties must therefore be discussed in detail.</p><p>The fact that most Polymer matrices are lacking in good adhesion is the major problem in natural fiber-reinforced composites’ processing. This can prevent natural fibers’ hydrophilic nature from interlocking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref59">59</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref60">60</xref>] and can thus adhere to hydrophobic matrixes. For preventing this, the fibers’ surface must be adhesively modified for improving composite machinability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref61">61</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref62">62</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref63">63</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref64">64</xref>]. Khan and Kumar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref10">10</xref>] examined the short agave fiber-reinforced epoxy composites’ machinability for fiber-matrix interaction for alkali-treated as well as untreated (5%) fibers. It was discovered that the treated composites had rough surfaces that resulted in improved interlocking among the matrix and fiber and raised the contact area. The untreated composites, on the other hand, were found to have voids. Valadez-Gonz&#225;lez et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref61">61</xref>] revealed qualitatively identical findings to those obtained by the authors in examinations of the influence on fiber strength of the matrix bonding of reinforced composites with natural fiber-surface treatments.</p><p>Athijayamani, Thiruchitrambalam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref55">55</xref>] investigated the “machinability of an alkali-treated natural fiber (sisal and roselle) hybrid polyester composite in terms of weight loss.” 10% NaOH (sodium hydroxide) solution treatment was applied to fibers for varying periods (2, 4, 6, and 8 hours). Gradual weight loss has been seen as the wear test time (4, 8, and 12 minutes) was increased, and composite samples treated with alkali outperformed the untreated composite samples in terms of wear performance. This could have occurred as a result of the alkali treatment, which removed moisture from the fibers and showed rising results in the interfacial bonding strength between matrix and reinforcement, as per a few researchers. Nam, Ogihara [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref54">54</xref>] examined the alkali-treated as well as untreated “(5% NaOH) coir fiber-reinforced poly (butylene succinate) biodegradable” composites’ machinability in terms of the Ra (roughness average). It has been reported that treating the fiber with 5% alkali for 72 hours increased the Ra along with cellulose amount exposed on the fiber surface, which in turn strengthened the mechanical connection between matrix as well as fiber and resulted in improved machinability. Kabir, Wang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref65">65</xref>] reported similar results for the o alkali treatment’s effects on Ra of hemp fiber-reinforced sandwich composites, and these findings are qualitatively the same as to report.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Mechanical Characteristics of Natural Fiber Polymer Composites</title><p>Natural fibers were utilized in the past in certain industries that dealt with door inner panels, seat backs, as well as roof inner panels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref66">66</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref67">67</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref68">68</xref>], among other things. Mallick [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref69">69</xref>] has stated that natural fibers have recently risen to the top of the list of engineers, scientists, as well as researchers’ priorities as the elective material for FRP “Fiber-Reinforced Polymer” composites reinforcement. It is becoming more popular to use natural fibers because they have several advantages over synthetic fibers, for example, their low cost as well as non-abrasiveness. Natural fibers affect fiberglass-reinforced plastics’ properties, and they may be utilized for improving the material’s tensile strength. Enhanced interfacial bonding, as well as a raise in Young’s modulus of the composite mixture, are achieved through chemical modifications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref15">15</xref>]. Natural fibers have assumed a central role in the textile industry because of their favorable mechanical properties as well as their low cost, high specific strength, non-abrasiveness, biodegradability, as well as environmental friendliness. Because of their numerous benefits over conventional fibers, for example, carbon as well as glass fiber, they are frequently used as substitutes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref70">70</xref>].</p><p>Natural fibers have an impact on the nature of polymeric composites in several ways, including altering polymers’ tensile properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref47">47</xref>]. Irrespective of which polymer type is utilized, polymer’s tensile properties are modified by altering the interface adhesion between matrix and fibers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref71">71</xref>]. The interfacial matrix-fiber bonding of natural fiber composites may be enhanced through the utilization of various chemical modifications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref72">72</xref>]. When it comes to increasing the natural fiber’s strength, it is necessary to increase its content to a maximum or optimal level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref59">59</xref>]. Also, Ma, Yu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref73">73</xref>] has reported, the best natural fiber composite’s Young’s modulus has been achieved by determining the optimum fiber content utilized in the mixture. For example, increasing the fiber loading of FRP results shows a significant rise in material’s tensile strength as well as Young’s modulus. For composites containing 10 wt% coir fibers, an improvement of more than 34% and 22% was attained in the tensile strength and elastic modulus, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref74">74</xref>]. Mallick [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref69">69</xref>] in his book, summarized the jute fibers, flax sisal, and hemp’s mechanical properties, giving overall information regarding the fibers’ elongation and modulus as well as tensile strength. As additional information and analysis sources, the following sections examine the chemical treatments’ effect on the fibers and composites’ mechanical properties, including fibers’ orientation and volume fraction.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Effect of Chemical Treatment</title><p>This is recognized that natural fibers have a problem when it comes to their compatibility with a matrix of any kind (interfacial adhesion). Primarily this issue is caused by the existence of tissue on the fiber surface, which reduces fibers interlocking with the matrix and causes them to loosen from the matrix. Several studies have found that untreated fibers can cause pull-out mechanisms (such as tensile, flexural mechanisms, and tribology) to occur under loading conditions. A few techniques, including fiber’s chemical treatment, may be utilized to overcome the fiber adhesion problem to the matrix at the interfacial interface [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref61">61</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref62">62</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref75">75</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref76">76</xref>].</p><p>Chemical treatment is the cleaning procedure of fiber’s surface, eliminating some tissue, decreasing the moisture absorption level along with rising the Ra [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref59">59</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref60">60</xref>]. Numerous writers have studied the chemical treatments’ effect (for example CaCl<sub>2</sub>, Ca (OH)<sub>2</sub>, lime water, acetylation, bleaching, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, polyethyleneimine, and NaOH) on fibers’ interfacial adhesion with a matrix that in turn, affects the composites’ properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref56">56</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref61">61</xref>]. In chemical solution, fiber’s immersion is the most widely utilized technique for chemically treated fibers. The efficiency of the chemical treatment depends upon the solution’s concentration, the immersion duration, fibers’ surface characteristics, and the type of fiber used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref63">63</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref64">64</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref77">77</xref>].</p><p>Using sisal and roselle fiber, Athijayamani, Thiruchitrambalam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref55">55</xref>] studied the immersion duration impacts (2 - 8 hours) in alkali (10%) on the hybrid polyester composites’ mechanical properties. According to the findings of this study, raising the immersion duration resulted in a 59 percent and a 47 percent rise in composite’s flexural strength and tensile strength, respectively. These were because of the significant enhancement in fibers’ interfacial adhesion with a matrix that occurred as a result of the removal of the outer layer of tissue from the fiber surface following the procedure. Throughout tensile loading, this increased the fiber’s adherence to the matrix as well as allowed it to carry a portion of the load. However, this was discovered that the untreated fibers have been found unable to support the load. As previously reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref48">48</xref>], similar results were obtained when short agave fibers had been treated for alkaline as well as utilized to reinforce epoxy composites. This is possible to argue that the increased duration of the treatment caused damage to the fibers’ tissue, resulting in a weaker interfacial adhesion between matrix along with fiber.</p><p>A study conducted by Kabir et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref65">65</xref>] observed the hemp fiber-reinforced sandwich composites’ mechanical properties had been treated in 3 distinct chemical ways (alkalization, acetylation, and salination). According to the findings, fibers treated with alkali and pre-soaked in 8% NaOH had more tensile strength (111.05 MPa) as compared to untreated fibers (84.06 MPa) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), and this has been because of the removal of lignin, hemicelluloses, along with other cellulosic constituents from the fiber by the treatment. As a result, the fiber as well as the matrix adhered to one another more effectively. The use of saline, on the other hand, resulted in a fiber surface that was coated. The adhesion quality between the matrix and fiber was lowered as a result of this. Lastly, acetylated fibers exhibited a brittle surface on their outer surface. In chemically treated natural fibers’ case, numerous authors have reported similar findings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref69">69</xref>].</p><p>Edeerozey, Akil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref52">52</xref>] investigated some impacts of treating kenaf fibers with NaOH at various concentrations (3 percent to 9 percent) on fiber’s tensile strength. The researchers concluded that 3 percent NaOH has been ineffective at removing impurities. The most effective concentration for treating the fiber has been 6 percent NaOH, which completely removed the impurities from the fiber. The increased concentration of NaOH attacked the fiber’s primary structural components, resulting in the appearance of more grooves on its surface. The fiber’s strength was further reduced as a result of this. As a result of increasing the concentration of NaOH, the tensile strength began to decline (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Fibers treated with 6 percent NaOH show the highest tensile strength, whereas untreated fibers show the lowest, with 215.4 N/mm<sup>2</sup> for the highest tensile test result. The removal of impurities was responsible for the increase in strength. Researchers Eichhorn et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref68">68</xref>] discovered something similar when they used kapok fibers to treat them with a high concentration of a chemical solution.</p><p>Saha, Manna [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref61">61</xref>] examined two different chemical treatment methods. First, fibers have been immersed in 0.5 - 18 percent NaOH for varying periods, ranging from 30 min - 24 hours at 30˚C. While the other method involved immersing the fibers in 0.5 - 18 percent NaOH for 30 minutes period time to 8 hours at 30˚C, depending on the concentration. When 0.5 percent alkali/steam treatment has been applied to the fibers, this was discovered that the tensile strength (610 MPa) increased by 65 percent (from 370 MPa) when compared to the untreated fibers (370 MPa) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). It has been because of fiber separation as well as the removal of non-cellulosic materials.</p><p>Alawar, Hamed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref41">41</xref>] studied the date palm tree fibers’ elongation at break, mechanical properties, tensile strength, young’s modulus, subjected to various chemical treatments (0.3 - 1.6 percent HCl and 0.5 - 5 percent NaOH). This has been shown to enhance the surface morphology of fiber surfaces by cleansing fiber surfaces of contaminants with a 1 percent NaOH treatment. In comparison to the raw fibers of 200 MPa as well as the young module, the tensile resistance raised to 800 MPa, up to 160 GPa compared with raw fibers of 8 GPa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). On the other hand, the surface morphology was observed to be distorted and the tensile strength reduced to 105 MPa when HCl treatment has been utilized. In the last, the treated fibers presented higher resistance to degradation (42 percent) than the raw fibers (35 percent). Usually, increased concentrations of HCl weakened the fibers. Moreover, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> summarizes some of the recent works that study the effect of chemical treatment of natural fibers on mechanical characteristics of natural fiber polymer composites.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Summarizes some of the recent works that study the effect of chemical treatment of natural fibers on mechanical characteristics of natural fiber polymer composites</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fiber</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Matrix</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sisal and Roselle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref69">69</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hybrid Polyester</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; NaOH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Raising the immersion duration resulted in: &#183; Flexural strength increases by 59% &#183; Tensile strength increases by 47%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agave [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref48">48</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epoxy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; NaOH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Increased duration of the treatment caused: &#183; Fibers’ tissue damages &#183; Interfacial adhesion decreases</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref65">65</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >polyester</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; NaOH &#183; Acetylation &#183; Salination</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Fibers treated with 8% NaOH had more tensile strength as compared to untreated fibers. &#183; Saline treatment led to lower the adhesion quality between the matrix and fiber</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coir [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref66">66</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polyethylene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Silane (0.5 wt%) &#183; NaOH (1.6 mol/L) &#183; Dodecane bromide (C12) (3 mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Silane increased adhesion force by 12% &#183; NaOH decreased adhesion by 4% &#183; C12 increased adhesion force by 4%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Betel nut [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref16">16</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Polyester &#183; Epoxy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; HCl 4% &#183; HCl 6% &#183; NaOH 4% &#183; NaOH 6%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; 6% NaOH with polyester increased adhesion force by 130% &#183; 6% NaOH with epoxy increased adhesion force by 112%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Banana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref67">67</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Polylactide (PLA)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; NaOH 10%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Interfacial adhesion increased by 93%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shalwan and Yousif [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref24">24</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Epoxy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; 6% NaOH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Highly enhanced the interfacial adhesion compared to the untreated fibers</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Effect of Fiber Orientation</title><p>Fiber orientation plays an essential part in the control of natural FRP composites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref59">59</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref78">78</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref79">79</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref80">80</xref>] irrespective of the marked influence of fiber processing on composites’ mechanical properties, as stated in the last section. Valadez-Gonzalez, Cervantes-Uc [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref56">56</xref>] investigated the effect on mechanical properties (flexural as well as tensile strength) of henequen fiber-reinforced high-density polyethylene of the fibers (longitudinal or transverse) and treatment with 2 percent HAO (HDPE). In terms of modules of elasticity, tensile strength, as well as flexure strength, this paper demonstrated that the longitudinal orientation had approximately 90 - 95 percent higher mechanical properties than transverse orientation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Fiber’s longitudinal orientation, combined with chemical treatment, increased the fibers interlock in a composite that resulted in a better transversal mechanical characteristic than those in the untreated fibers.</p><p>Brahim and Cheikh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref13">13</xref>] investigated the effects of polyester composite’s mechanical properties on fiber orientation (0˚ - 90˚) of unidirectional Alfa fibers (modulus of elasticity and tensile stress). The fibers were extracted from the Alfa plant by soda procedure whereby the plant stem has been heated for 2 hours with a NaOH solution of 3% at 100˚C temperature and then bleached with a NaClO solution of 40% for 1 hour. The composite’s mechanical properties (modulus of elasticity and tensile stress) have been found weakened with the increase in the angle of orientation from 12.3 to 5 GPa and from 150 to 18 MPa.</p><p>This may be described by the fact that if the fibers have been orientated in the direction of load (0˚) this would cause the load to be distributed along the entire fiber’s length. Moreover, if load directions had not been parallel to fibers, the load did not spread throughout the whole fiber, thus reducing the value.</p><p>Jacob, Thomas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref82">82</xref>] examined the impact of the orientation fiber (0˚ - 90˚) on the tensile strength of the natural rubber composite sisal/oil palm hybrid fiber. They found that when the fibers are longitudinally oriented (0˚), the maximum tensile strength (8 MPa) is achieved. By contrast, tensile strength is reduced to 4 MPa when the angle for the orientation of fibers has been raised to 90˚. When the fibers are lined up (longitudinally) in a force direction, stress is transferred evenly. Moreover, they cannot distribute a lot of stress when fibers are aligned (transversely) with load direction.</p><p>De Albuquerque, Joseph [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref15">15</xref>] examined the fiber orientation’s effect on the jute roving reinforced polyester composites’ tensile strength. This has been observed that tensile strength is directly proportional to the fiber content in the transversal direction because, with the rise in fiber content from 0 percent to 30 percent by weight, tensile strength also raised from 40 MPa to 65 MPa. On the other hand, tensile strength is inversely proportional to fiber content in the longitudinal direction as tensile strength reduced from 40 MPa to 10 MPa with the same rise in fiber content. Such results may have been because of the obstacles presented by the longitudinally orientated fiber, which inhibited the stress distribution throughout the matrix, therefore causing a higher stress concentration along with inadequate mechanical properties.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Effect of Volume Fraction</title><p>It has been shown that the fiber V<sub>f</sub> (such as the fiber’s concentration in composite) has a significant impact on composites’ mechanical properties. This was also reported that some increases in the fiber’s V<sub>f</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref81">81</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref83">83</xref>] can result in an improvement in the fiber’s mechanical properties. Above a specific level, high V<sub>f</sub> can cause fiber clotting, as well as applied loads, which cannot be distributed consistently that limiting the mechanical properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref70">70</xref>]. Hence, strengthening the composite depends on the optimization of a fiber’s V<sub>f</sub> value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref71">71</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref72">72</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref73">73</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref74">74</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref84">84</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref89">89</xref>]. M&#252;ller, Laurindo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref78">78</xref>] and Bras, Hassan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref79">79</xref>] examined cellulose fibers’ (V<sub>f</sub> ) effects on starch-based composite’s mechanical properties. This research demonstrated that raising the fiber’s volume in composite resulted in a rise in the reinforced composites’ elasticity modulus and tensile strength above that of the neat composite.</p><p>Brahim and Cheikh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref13">13</xref>] evaluated as well as compared to synthetic composites based on glass fiber for fiber V<sub>f</sub> effect (0% - 44%) on Alpha/polyester composites’ mechanical properties (longitudinal stress). The findings noticed that the composite’s mechanical properties increased by up to 44% with V<sub>f</sub> increases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) and have been closely related to synthetic fiber composite (glass) at similar V<sub>f</sub>. Yousif [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref70">70</xref>] investigated the V<sub>f</sub> effect (0 percent to 60 percent) on polyester composites’ mechanical properties from oil palm fruit fibers.</p><p>Yousif [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref70">70</xref>] examined the polyester composites’ mechanical properties for the impact of V<sub>f</sub> (0 - 60 percent) from oil palm fibers. The conclusion is that the volume fraction was increased by around 110% compared to neat polyester, resulting in the 41%rise in tensile strength. The increase in composite’s compression strength to 38% resulted in a 30 percent increase in the V<sub>f</sub>. Such results had been caused by strain distribution or uniform stress in the composite. But the clotted fiber cannot be distributed equally at higher fiber loading, and the load applied. Likewise, the composite’s tensile strength decreased as the fiber V<sub>f</sub> increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Effect of Physical Properties of Fibers</title><p>Various research on fibers’ physical properties was conducted which affect the natural composites’ final properties. It thus includes the fiber’s quality of the matrix, length, size as well as diameter of the fiber, porosity, moisture absorption as well as how fibers break down with matrix [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref90">90</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref97">97</xref>]. Due to concentrated mechanical and thermal stresses, fibers are subjected to this mixing process during which they break up and thus lose some of their reinforcing action. However, in the composite’s mechanical property, as mentioned by Le Duc, Vergnes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref98">98</xref>], the fiber’s aspect ratio, that is the ratio between diameter (D) and longitude (L) also plays a significant part.</p><p>Brahmakumar, Pavithran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref99">99</xref>] examined the impact of fiber composites’ mechanical properties (5 - 25 mm) as well as fiber content (10 - 27 percent) (strength, elongation, and modulus). Fiber length rises from 5 mm to 20 mm reportedly resulted in an increase of 52 percent, 31 percent, and 26 percent of tensile strength, elongation, and tensile module respectively. Although, over 20 mm length, tensile modulus reduced by 13% while tensile strength reduced by 8%), although the elongation value was no longer modified. Furthermore, an increase of 10% - 25% in the fiber content caused an increase of 48% tensile resistance along with 53% tensile modulus, whilst an increase of 50% in the elongation value has been observed. However, over and above 25% fiber content, declines were observed in tensile modulus and tensile strength, and no changes were observed in elongation value (up to 5% and 14% respectively).</p><p>Beg and Pickering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref8">8</xref>] have examined the impact of fiber length (0.95 mm to 3.07 mm) on mechanical characteristics (impact strength, failure pressure, Youngs’ modulus along with tensile strength) of kraft, fiber-enhanced polypropylene compounds. The decrease of the fiber length resulted in an increase in the tensile force from 37 MPa to 43 MPa, Yung modulus from 3.8 GPa to 4.6 GPa and impact power from 5.6 kJ/m<sup>2</sup> to 6.5 kJ/m<sup>2</sup>, while stress failure reduced between 2.47 and 1.91 percent. Such mechanical characteristics changes may be caused by the decreased reinforcement efficiencies, that Harper, Turner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref100">100</xref>].</p><p>Yemele, Koubaa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref101">101</xref>] utilized a factorial design for examining the impacts of bark fiber content (trembling aspen bark along with black spruce bark) and size (0.50 - 1.00 mm coarse; 0.25 - 0.50 mm medium; 0.18 - 0.25 mm fine) on bark/HDPE composites’ tensile strength as well as flexural modulus. It was found that the fine fiber of trembling aspen bark and black spruce bark had the lowest L/D ratios (3.83 and 8.85, respectively) and that the coarse fiber of trembling aspen bark and black spruce bark had the highest L/D ratios (10.68 and 13.83 and, respectively). The experiments’ results revealed that rising the material’s fiber content, resulted in increases in flexural modulus as well as tensile strength. More importantly, increasing the length of the fibers increased their elasticity and strength while decreasing their toughness along with tensile strain at failure, indicating that fiber content impacts on mechanical properties have been more essential than the impact of fiber size on mechanical properties.</p><p>Migneault, Koubaa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref85">85</xref>] investigated the L/D ratio effect (8 - 21.3), with two treatment techniques, on tension and flexural module of wood-plastic composites (injection molding and extrusion). In both processes, the fiber L/D ratio had a similar impact on tensile strength as well as a flexural module. Fiber L/D ratio increased in both, but to a different extent. The injection molding process associated with increasing fiber size, however, resulted in improved mechanical properties than the extrusion procedure. This disadvantage is usually related to fiber fracture in the extrusion process, as other studies have indicated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref102">102</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Recommendations and Main Points Extracted from the Previous Discussions</title><p>It was discovered that chemical treatment of natural fibers improved their compatibility with the matrix by removing their surface tissues, increasing the Ra, and reducing moisture absorption. This resulted in improved mechanical properties of the composites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref61">61</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref62">62</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref75">75</xref>]. The duration of chemical treatment was vital. The mechanical properties increased with a longer duration of treatment, but they would peak to a maximum and then fall. The usual chemical used was NaOH, at different concentrations.</p><p>Orientation of the fiber also plays an important role in controlling the mechanical properties of the composites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref81">81</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref93">93</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref101">101</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref103">103</xref>]. Herrera-Franco and Valadez-Gonz&#225;lez [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref81">81</xref>] and Jacob, Thomas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref82">82</xref>], respectively, found that longitudinal fiber orientation provided much higher tensile and flexural strengths than its traverse orientation counterpart. It was also reported that mechanical properties could be enhanced by increasing fiber V<sub>f</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref71">71</xref>]. However, V<sub>f</sub> above a certain level causes fiber clotting, thus the applied loads cannot be distributed evenly, which leads to a decrease in mechanical properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref70">70</xref>]. Therefore, the optimization of a fiber V<sub>f</sub> value is necessary for strengthening the composite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref71">71</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref72">72</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref73">73</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref84">84</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref85">85</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref86">86</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref87">87</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref88">88</xref>].</p><p>Some physical properties of the fibers, including quality of fiber distributed in the matrix; fiber size, length, and diameter; moisture absorption; porosity and the way fibers break during compounding with the matrix, were found to affect the mechanical properties of the composites formed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref70">70</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref85">85</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref90">90</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref93">93</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref104">104</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref105">105</xref>]. Moreover, the aspect ratio of the fiber (L/D) also plays an important role in the mechanical properties of the composite, as mentioned by Le Duc, Vergnes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref98">98</xref>]. Beg and Pickering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref8">8</xref>] found that a decrease in fiber length led to an increase in tensile strength, young’s modulus, and impact strength of kraft fiber reinforced polypropylene composites.</p><p>From the above work and discussion, it can be concluded that the mechanical properties of natural FRP composites are affected not only by the interfacial adhesion between the fibers and the matrix but also by the length and aspect ratio of the fibers and their V<sub>f</sub>, orientation, and dispersion in the composites. Moreover, fiber dispersion and length are correlated with the mixing number and shear levels in processing”.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Machinability of Synthetic Fiber/Polymer Composites</title><p>The synthetic fiber composites’ machining, for example, carbon fiber and glass fiber composites, is the main issue due to their extreme hardness, inert nature, along with re-fractoriness to machinability in terms of material removal rate, thrust force, cutting power, Ra, delamination size, as well as bearing strength utilizing a drilling procedure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref3">3</xref>]. Moreover, synthetic fibers’ abrasive nature causes poor surface finish along with fast tool wear. Therefore, for machining procedures, the appropriate selection of cutting parameters as well as tools is very essential. Furthermore, the machining parameters’ effect for exam-ple V<sub>f</sub> (volume fraction), fiber orientation, drill diameter, speed, and feed influence greatly the materials’ machinability (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref7">7</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref63">63</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref67">67</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref76">76</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref86">86</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref87">87</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref88">88</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref89">89</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref102">102</xref>]. In the following parts, the effects of working parameters on the synthetic fiber-based composites’ machin-ability are discussed.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Effect of the Operating Parameters on Thrust Force</title><p>Tsao and Hocheng [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref90">90</xref>] have researched the impact on machining machinability regarding the thrust force of woven GFRE composites with the use of a driller machine from machining parameters (speed, feed along with drill diameter). The cutting conditions were reported to produce higher than expected thrust strength, but no apparent effect was observed when speed was cut.</p><p>Khashaba, El-Sonbaty [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref83">83</xref>] examined the effect, using a drill machine with 2 distinct methods of cemented carbide (K 10) drills of cutting parameters (feed rate and velocity) under a precise cutting pressure on machinability as regards thrust strength of GFRP (Spur &amp; Brad as well as Stub Length). The findings indicate that the thrust forces of two drills were raised with the raising feed rate under the same cutting conditions and that the thrust pressure values of Brad &amp; Spur were lower than the thrust strength box. Ku, Wang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref71">71</xref>] have also done similar work, testing a drilling machine with various cutting speeds as well as various feed rates for the same reinforced material. In the case of neat epoxy, the cutting speed from 10m/minute to 45m/minute has noticed a negligible effect on the thrush force. This may be due to heat increases around the edge of the instrument that has demolished the matrix and therefore decreased the resistance force. Nevertheless, there were conflicting outcomes in GFRE composites. With the increase in cutting speed from 5 m/minute to 45 m/minute, the thrust force reduced by 29.4 percent. Moreover, when drill diameter and V<sub>f</sub> fiber were increasing, the thrust strength increased by 62.5%. Mata, Gaitonde [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref14">14</xref>] used a drill press to report similar research, material as well as results. The reactions of the thrust force were delayed, and because of the matrix softening to the generated heat, thrust force values were reduced. Furthermore, the speed reduction effect on thrust force has been noticeable.</p><p>To examine drilling variables’ effect on machinability using tipped-carbide drilling tool on drilling machine, Jacob, Thomas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref82">82</xref>] utilized a high V<sub>f</sub> (66%) GFRC (glass/phenolic woven fabric) and several holes (300). Results have shown that the thrust force is rising as the feed rate rises. This could result from an increase in the undeformed chip’s cross-section area. A progressive, slow increase of thrust strength with the growing number of drilled trout, usually linked to the steady wear state of the cutting edge, was observed.</p><p>El-Sonbaty et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref95">95</xref>] used drilling to study the effect of two forms of the matrix (thermoset and thermoplastics) on machinability in terms of the thrust force of woven GFRC. This has been found that with the rise in drilled holes, thrust forces also rise for both matrices, however, the increase has been greater in the thermoset composites. The cause of this may have been machining-induced defects, for example, delamination and debonding.</p><p>Tsao and Chiu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref19">19</xref>] inspected the machinability cutting parameters’ effects in thrust force using three types of stepping-core drills (saw, twist, as well as a candle) for laminates used for CFRP (carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic) compositions. The used cutting parameters were 800 - 1200 revolutions spindle speeds per minute, 8 - 16 mm/rev feed rates, 5.5 - 7.4 mm/mm diameter ratios. The increased performance parameters were found to lead to an increase in thrust force. By reducing the diameter and spindle speed as well as increasing feed rate, the highest thrust force was achieved.</p><p>Instead, when spindle speed along with diameter ratio was increased and feed rate was lower, the lowest thrust has been recorded. In addition, it proposes the highest thrust force in the step-core saw. The main cutting parameters were the diameter ratio (1200 RPM). The reasons for these findings were, however, not obvious. There were two main cutting parameters for example diameter ratio along with feed rate while the best experimental conditions have been found by a combination of 1200 RPM spindle speed, 8 mm/rev low feed rate along with 0.74 mm/mm high diameter ratio. However, the reasons for such outcomes were not clear.</p><p>Bras, Hassan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref79">79</xref>] evaluated the machining parameters’ effect (drill diameter, speed as well as feed) for the machinability of drilling tissue composites utilizing drill machine. By comparing two drills of various diameters, the cutting parameter’s effects were investigated on thrust force. For drilling processes, a radial drill machine with carbide cemented drills has been utilized. The outcomes also demonstrated that thrust force raised with a higher cutting rate of feed for each drill diameter. But the drill showed higher thrust forces with a larger diameter. This has been due to an increase in the chip formation resistance along with axial thrust as the cross-sectional area of the undeformed chip has increased.</p><p>Tsao and Chiu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref19">19</xref>] researched the impact of drilling parameters on the machinability of CFRPs for thrust forces. The parameters investigated have been the spindle velocity for inner diameters (1.088 - 1.360 RPM) and outer spindles (1.000 RPM - 1.214 RPM), the cutting velocity ratio (−2 - 2), 10 - 20 mm/min feed rate, (outer drills and inner drills). Due to the chip clog in the drill head, feed rate, cutting speed, along the type of inner drill had impacts on thrust force. Nevertheless, when compared to the other factors, the stretch, as well as outer drill diameter, had the least impact on thrust force generated by composite. In addition, when a small feed rate has been utilized and smaller chips were produced as well as delamination was reduced.</p><p>Eichhorn, Baillie [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref62">62</xref>] investigate the impact on machinability of thin CFRP laminates by utilizing carbide drill (K20) by drilling parameters (feed rate and spindle speed). This was discovered that feed rate is directly proportional to thrust forces. As a result of the rise in the self-generated feed angle, the drill’s working clearance angle was reduced significantly, resulting in the drill rubbing against the work material as well as generating higher thrust forces, which may have contributed to this. On the other hand, it has been discovered that thrust forces decrease as spindle speed is increased. The increasing temperature along with spindle speed may cause the composite to soften, which could explain the phenomenon. A brief discussion on the effect of operating parameters on the machinability of the composites based on synthetic fibers is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effect of the Operating Parameters on Surface Roughness</title><p>Hocheng and Tsao [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref91">91</xref>] investigated the impact on machinability of GFRE composites using a drill machine of machinations by using processing parameters (feeds, speeds, and cutting diameters). Ra has been reported to rise at the cutting feed rate, however, there was no apparent impact of cutting speed. Davim and Reis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref4">4</xref>] have studied the impact on machinability of Ra for GFRPs of cutting parameters (feed rate as well as cutting speed) at precise cutting pressures. Two various kinds of cemented carbide (K10) drilling were fitted to the machine (Stub Length and Brad &amp; Spur). For both drills, the findings showed high Ra values. Moreover, the Brad &amp; Spur performance was higher than Stub Length performance drill, which produced small Ra. More values at high feed rate have been observed whereas lower Ra values at high cutting speeds have been obtained, meaning better finish at a high cutting speed along with low feed rate.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of the operating parameters on machinability in terms of thrust force</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Researcher</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Synthetic fiber</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Matrix</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Operating parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Findings</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tsao and Hocheng [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref90">90</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plastic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Diameter ratio &#183; Feed rate &#183; Spindle speed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; The highest thrust force was by decreasing diameter ratio, spindle speed, and increasing feed rate &#183; Lowest thrust force recorded when diameter ratio and spindle speed increased while decreasing feed rate</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Khashaba, El-Sonbaty [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref93">93</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woven Glass fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epoxy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Feed rate &#183; Spindle speed &#183; Drill diameter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Increasing the cutting feed rates increased the thrust force &#183; Higher thrust forces were obtained with a bigger diameter.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tsao and Chiu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref19">19</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plastic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Spindle speed &#183; Cutting velocity &#183; Feed rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Cutting velocity and feed rate have the most impact on thrust force</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Krishnaraj, Prabukarthi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref96">96</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plastic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Spindle speed &#183; Feed rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Thrust forces increased with an increase in feed rate &#183; Thrust forces decreased with an increase in spindle speed</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Khashaba, El-Sonbaty [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref83">83</xref>] examined the impacts of cutting parameters (cutting feed as well as speed) on processability in the FRPs with two different matrices of the Brad &amp; Spur cemented carbide (Viapal VUP 9731 and ATLAC 382-05) on specific cutting forces (K10). The outcomes showed that with increased feed rates, Ra increased and decreased with a higher cutting speed.</p><p>In their research, El-Sonbaty, Khashaba [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref95">95</xref>] looked at the effects of 218 - 1850 RPM cutting speed, and 8 - 13 mm drill size, 0.05 - 0.23 mm/rev feed rate on glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites. They were utilizing standard cutting processes to evaluate fiber V<sub>f</sub> (0 - 23.7 percent) with Ra machinability. The cutting velocity and feed rate had little influence on Ra for nice epoxy. The composites of GFRE, however, revealed various outcomes. A 75 percent drop in Ra (from 8 microns to 2 microns) was noted with an increased speed, V<sub>f</sub> , and driller diameters. This occurred because the reinforcing fibers supported by the matrix were increased. Mata, Gaitonde [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref14">14</xref>] et al. have reported similar studies, material, and findings.</p><p>Palanikumar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref104">104</xref>] investigated the influence of machining parameters (feed rate, cut depth, fiber orientation, cutting speed) on machinability in terms of Ra for GFRE composites while utilizing a drill machine. In this study, this has been discovered that Ra dropped as cut depth and cutting speed increased. Ra, on the other hand, rose in proportion to the increase in feed rate as well as fiber orientation.</p><p>Bras, Hassan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref79">79</xref>] examined the machining parameters’ effects (drill diameter, speed as well as feed) on machinability in terms of Ra. In this experiment, two drills of various diameters were used for evaluating the cutting parameters’ effect on Ra. The drilling procedures have been performed with the help of a radial drill machine and cemented carbide drills. At low cutting feed rates, the findings revealed that a full shearing of the fiber occurred, resulting in a surface finish that was considered to be of reasonable quality. Ra, on the other hand, rose in response to an increase in the cutting feed. This might be because partly sheared fibers have a relatively high Ra. The cutting speed, on the other hand, was not shown to have a significant impact. Furthermore, the cutting speed was discovered to have the most physical impact on Ra for both composite materials, and this has been the cutting parameter with the greatest physical influence on Ra.</p><p>Kini and Chincholkar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref94">94</xref>] investigated the influence of machining parameters (tool nose radius, cut depth, feed rate, speed) on the machinability of GFRC plastic “in terms of Ra, utilizing a turning lathe equipped with coated tungsten carbide inserts. In their research, they discovered that a low feed rate” (0.25 mm/rev) resulted in greater Ra levels (2.48 m), presumably because the fibers flowed easily at this rate, leading Ra to rise. Similarly, this was also discovered that feed rate was the most critical issue influencing Ra. A brief discussion on the effect of operating parameters on the machinability of the composites based on synthetic fibers is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of the operating parameters on machinability in terms of surface roughness</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Researcher</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Synthetic Fiber</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Matrix</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Operating Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Findings</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hocheng and Tsao [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref91">91</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woven Glass fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epoxy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Feed rate &#183; Spindle speed &#183; Drill diameter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Ra increased with an increased cutting feed rate &#183; No obvious effect of cutting speed</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palanikumar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref106">106</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glass fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epoxy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; cutting speed &#183; Fiber orientation &#183; depth of cut &#183; Feed rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Ra decreased as cutting speed and depth of cut increased &#183; Ra increased as feed rate and the fiber orientation increased</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Khashaba, El-Sonbaty [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref93">93</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woven Glass fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epoxy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Feed rate &#183; Spindle speed &#183; Drill diameter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Ra increased with increasing the cutting feed &#183; no clear effect of cutting speed</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kini and Chincholkar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref94">94</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glass fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polymer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Feed rate &#183; Spindle speed &#183; Depth of cut</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Large values of Ra recorded at low feed rates &#183; Feed rate is most effective factor</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effect of the Operating Parameters on Hole Accuracy</title><p>Many studies, for example [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref93">93</xref>], have investigated fixed dimensions and geometric tolerances. Nevertheless, the nature of the composites produced few useful outcomes. Hole features can contribute to early failure, particularly in the attachment assemblies. There are various methods to describe the quality of the generated hole [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref9">9</xref>]. The characteristics of workpieces may be characterized as a geometric error or a series of errors. Errors in hole roundness and holed size have been the most critical criterion highlighted by Jain, Choudhury [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref9">9</xref>]. The fibers were bent throughout the drilling process as well as broken by the effect of the cutting edge. The fibers tried to reset after the shear failure, which caused a strain around a drill and therefore reduced the size of the drilled hole to below the cutting diameter. This is frequently found when composites are drilled laminated GFRP.</p><p>Nevertheless, when GFRP composites with a greater fiber content are drilled, such a decrease has not been seen because the woven fabric, according to Khashaba et al, does not enable fibers to bend much [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref93">93</xref>]. Synthetic polymeric composites are widely machined, particularly by drilling, to produce riveted. The usage of these polymer compounds by traditional drilling techniques is widely known to be challenging to generate with good quality lights [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref53">53</xref>]. Highly efficient. Therefore, the most precise holes must be created with costly drilling procedures and specific drill bits.</p><p>Beg and Pickering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref8">8</xref>] performed several drilling tests with high-speed steel (HSS) drills on woven glass fabric/epoxy. The first and last hole exit micrographs varied substantially. This can be seen clearly that the first hole was more accurately drilled than the last one, and the accuracy of the holes declined as the number of drilled holes rose. This was because of the gradual usage of the device and rising thrust force at the hole exit. Brahmakumar, Pavithran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref99">99</xref>] observed the same outcomes when multiple CFRP drilling trials utilizing carbide driller were performed.</p><p>Eichhorn, Baillie [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref62">62</xref>] examined the drilling parameters’ effects (feed rate and spindle speed) on machinability, as measured by the precision of drilled holes in thin CFRP laminates while utilizing carbide drill (K20). For all drilling settings variations in the size of the holes were found. It was discovered that when cutting feeds were low, but spindle speed was high, larger holes were produced. This may be explained by two things. The accumulated friction heat may have led to an increase in the cutting temperature. Secondly, larger shear pressures might be due to increased resistance to cuts, due to thinner uncut chips.</p><p>In their survey, Khashaba, El-Sonbaty [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref83">83</xref>] used a carbide tip drill cutting tool in a high-V<sub>f</sub> (66 percent) GFRC (glass-/phenolic fabric) to examine the drilling variables’ effects (cutting speed along with feed) and holes (300) on machinability as far as the size of the drilled holes is concerned. Observations were made on the variation in hole sizes as well as a decrease in the frequency of oversize holes as a result of wear on the drill tip as the number of holes drilled increased. Furthermore, it is possible that the change in hole sizes was caused by the thermal shrinkage of the matrix material as a result of the increased temperature. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> is shown the most important findings of the effect of operating parameters on the machinability of the composites based on synthetic fibers.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Effect of the Operating Parameters on Cutting Force Using Drill Machine</title><p>Khashaba, El-Sonbaty [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref83">83</xref>] examined the cutting parameters’ effects for drilling (cutting feed as well as speed) on the processability of precise cutting strength in FRPs using a Brad &amp; Spur cemented carbide drill (K10) for two distinct matrices (Viapal V UP 9731 and ATLac 382 05). The findings showed clearly, that as the two cutting parameters dropped, particular cut force (kc) decreased. With the same cutting settings, the Viapal VUP 9731 matrix demonstrated lower kc values (cutting feed and velocity). However, a cutting parameter that had the greatest effect on a particular cutting force has been determined to be feed speed for each composite material.</p><p>In terms of specific cutting force as well as force, Davim and Reis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref4">4</xref>] have analyzed the interaction impacts of machining parameters (cutting feed as well as speeds) on machinability of plain PEEK (Polyether Ether Ketone) and reinforced PEEK (30% carbon fibers, 30% glass fibers). A lathe was utilized fitted with carbide cemented tools (K10). The findings indicated the inclusion of the reinforcement improvements by 42.8 percent and 15.4 percent respectively, the mechanical characteristics (tensile modulus along with strength). Although the mechanical characteristics of reinforced PEEK have improved, the cutting power and reduction force for all materials increased 90 percent over those of plain PEEK was found as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. Consequently, reinforced PEEK machinability is more costly than nice PEEK.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of the operating parameters on machinability in terms of hole accuracy</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Researcher</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Synthetic Fiber</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Matrix</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Operating Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Findings</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Krishnaraj, Prabukarthi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref96">96</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plastic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Feed rate &#183; Spindle speed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Larger hole sizes recorded at lower cutting feeds and high spindle speed</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Velayudham, Krishnamurthy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref107">107</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glass fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polymer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Feed rate &#183; Spindle speed &#183; Number of drilled holes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; A variation in hole sizes has been noticed &#183; Reduction in oversize has been observed as the number of holes drilled increased</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of the operating parameters on machinability in terms of cutting force</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Researcher</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Synthetic Fiber</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Matrix</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Operating Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Findings</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Davim and Reis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref4">4</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; CF 30% &#183; GF 30%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PEEK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Cutting speed &#183; Feed rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Tensile modulus increased 42.8% &#183; Tensile strength increased 15.4% &#183; Increase in cutting power and cutting force by 90%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Effect of the Operating Parameters on Delamination Using a Drill Machine</title><p>Due to its inherent characteristics, polymeric composites are regarded preferable to be used as structural components [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref53">53</xref>]. However, composites with low drilling efficiencies and unwanted drilling-induced delamination are seen as challenging to machines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref11">11</xref>]. Due to various types of damage, drilling holes are possible. These may be divided into 4 types: delamination, damage related to temperature, geometric defects, delamination at drill entry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref72">72</xref>].</p><p>Delamination or interlaminar cracking in polymer composite materials is regarded as one of the major types of damage. The major difficulty related to drilling composite fiber-reinforced materials is examined. The Commission is responsible for the refusal of around 60% of aviation industry components [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref73">73</xref>]. Delamination may be split into two groups: peel-up delamination that happens at the entry along with push-out delamination around the perimeter of the drilled hole, which takes place at the outlet surrounding the drilling hole periphery.</p><p>Delamination may lead to decreased material’s structural integrity, low assembly tolerance, stiffness, and gradual degradation; it might result in a long-term loss of performance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref54">54</xref>]. Delamination generally refers to the layer’s separation into the composite through cell migration procedure that may be described further as motion by an external force, such as drilling of certain cells in the composite. The rise in delamination causes the Polymer Composite Structure to become stiffer, degraded, and eventually fail. Several approaches for measuring lamination after drilling composites have been utilized. These photographs are digital [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref108">108</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref109">109</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref110">110</xref>], S-Can [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref10">10</xref>], and a microscope shop. a series of GFRP composite twist drilling tests have been performed utilizing traditional drilling and vibration-based twisting for comparison of the delamination created by both procedures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref58">58</xref>]. Both approaches found that delamination was observed, although conventional drilling caused more delamination as compared to vibration-assisted drilling. This may be produced by a rise in thrust force when composite laminates are used to conventionally drill.</p><p>In terms of the machinery size delamination of the woven GFRE composites Bras, Hassan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref79">79</xref>] employing cemented carbide drill, examined the influence of machinery parameters (speeds, feeds along with drill diameters). Delamination-free holes have not been found. Push-out and Peel-up delamination of all machining parameters were evident in the pictures. Increased delamination via an increased feed rate, spindle speed, and drilling diameter. This occurred because the cross-section of the non-deformed chip grew, resulting in a higher thrust strength and a heat build-up near the tool edge, that degraded the strength of the matrix.</p><p>Ciftci, Turker [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref111">111</xref>] have achieved the same results with drills of various kinds (candlestick, twist along with saw drills) with thick carbon FRP. Ultrasonic scanning photos indicated that the delamination took place with all forms of drills, but more delamination was shown by the twist drill than by the saw drill and candlestick. It was because the cutting blades of the drills were different. Similar results have been published [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref13">13</xref>]; in this work, drilling techniques for hole formation have been employed for short GFC composites using 2 standard high- speed drilling machines.</p><p>Harper, Turner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref100">100</xref>] investigated the impact of three prepreg types with woven shapes or unidirectional on holes drill (3750) as well as feed rate (0.2 - 0.4 mm/rev) together with the influence on the machinability of CFRP’s cutting feed rate at the level of delamination. First, due to the proximity to the net shape manufacturing processes, the CFRP composites require fewer machining operations than the conventional materials. However, in terms of components and integrity, machinability issues were evident. Second, when the feed rate was 0.4 mm/rev, the longest instrument life has been found. Thirdly, usual wear on the drill head was evident in the SEM pictures, and for the majority of the holes drilled at a higher input rate, a catastrophic error was detected. A brief discussion Effect of the operating parameters on machinability in terms of delamination is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of the operating parameters on machinability in terms of delamination</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Researcher</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Synthetic Fiber</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Matrix</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Operating Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Findings</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arul, Vijayaraghavan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref112">112</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glass fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plastic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Conventional drilling &#183; Vibration-assisted twist drilling</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Delamination accorded in both techniques &#183; Conventional drilling-induced more delamination</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Khashaba, El-Sonbaty [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref93">93</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glass fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epoxy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Feed rate &#183; Spindle speed &#183; Drill diameter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Delamination-free holes have not been obtained &#183; Peel-up and push-out delaminations have been obvious &#183; Delamination size increased with increasing feed &#183; Delamination size increased with increasing feed, spindle speed, and drill diameter</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shyha, Soo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref20">20</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polymer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Number of holes &#183; feed rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Difficulties in machinability were presented &#183; The worn lip of the drill head was obvious</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Machinability Performance of Natural Fiber/Polymer Composites</title><p>This was also observed that machinability of these materials was less important than the machinability of Synthetic Materials for Ra, tool wear and life, cutting strengths, mate-rial elimination rate, cutting force, special cutting pressure, and machining force (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). The obtained observation stimulated the work under way for studying the machinability of polymer composites based on natural fiber.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Effect of Treatment on Machinability of Natural Fibers Reinforced Polymeric Composites</title><p>The machinability of natural fiber polymer composites’ literature can be viewed in the figures mentioned (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). Although the following sections examine key findings of works and identify the main problems because of the available resources for the various work procedures for natural fiber polymer composites. Natural fibers were utilized in composites as reinforcements for decades, but their machinability has been limited by their poor adhesion to most polymeric matrices. Due to their hydrophilic nature, natural fibers harm their adhesion to hydrophobic matrixes, which can result in interlocking between matrix and fiber being prevented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref81">81</xref>]. The fiber surface should be changed to enhance adhesion as well as, consequently, the composites’ machinability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref81">81</xref>]. This can be accomplished by modifying the fiber surface.</p><p>Mylsamy and Rajendras [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref20">20</xref>] studied the effect on machinability of fiber-matrix interaction for alkaline treated and untreated fibers by utilizing a frying machine from alkali-treated fibers (5 percent) of short-scale agave fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. The treatment was performed on rough surfaces that resulted in better fiber-matrix interlock and a rise in the contact area. In the untreated fibers, however, a void was observed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref50">50</xref>]. To prevent them, a modification of the fiber surface needs to be made in favor of adhesion for enhancing the composites’ machinability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref81">81</xref>].</p><p>According to Athijayamani, Thiruchitrambalam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref55">55</xref>], a drilling process was used for investigating the effects of alkali treatment on machinability of a natural fiber (sisal and roselle) hybrid polyester composite in terms of weight loss. The fibers have been subjected to a 10-percent NaOH solution treatment for varying times (2, 4, 6, and 8 hours). With the rise in wear test time (4, 8, and 12 minutes), Gradual weight loss has also been raised, and the alkali-treated composite samples outperformed the untreated composite samples in terms of wear performance. A possible explanation for this is that the alkali treatment removed moisture from the fibers that resulting in interfacial bonding strength between matrix as well as reinforcement.</p><p>In their study, Nam, Ogihara [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref54">54</xref>] used a drilling process to investigate the machinability of alkali-treated and untreated (5 percent NaOH) “coir fiber-reinforced poly (butylene succinate) biodegradable composites” in terms of the Ra. A 5-percent alkali treatment for 72 hours increased Ra along with cellulose amount exposed on the fiber surface, according to some researchers. This improved the mechanical interlocking between matrix and fiber, as well as the composite material’s machinability. A brief discussion on the effect of treatment on machinability of natural fibers reinforced polymeric composites is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Effect of Fiber Physical Properties</title><p>Few papers have reported the parameters, which impact the natural fiber composites’ machinability using a milling machine (i.e., the fiber distribution in the matrix, porosity, moisture absorption, diameter, and length of the fiber, along with how fibers break). Mylsamy and Rajendran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref48">48</xref>] studied the impacts of fiber length (3 mm, 7 mm, and 10 mm) on machinability for dimensional accuracy of the drilled holes (4 mm, 6 mm, 8.5 mm, and 12.5 mm) utilizing a drill machine to determine the machinability of various fiber lengths. On short-agave agave fiber-enhanced epoxy composites, an HSS drill bit has been utilized at 260 RPM. The 3 mm fiber-long compound with better dimensional accuracy was found to be optimum from the drilled hole test. As the results show, shorter fibers have improved the mobilization and impregnation of fibers. In turn, this resulted in improved workmanship.</p><p>The effects of the fiber content in the drilled-loom dimensional accuracy of a drill machine were investigated by Athijayamani, Thiruchitrambalam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref55">55</xref>] for hybrid polyester composites (5, 10, 20, and 30 wt. percent). Composite specimens with a fiber content of 30 wt. percent showed greater precision in their dimensions than composite specimens with a fiber content of 5 wt. percent. This can be due to the increased number of fibers that helped to maintain the surface of the drilled hole. A brief discussion on the Effect of fiber physical properties on machinability of natural fibers reinforced polymeric composites is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Effect of Operating Parameters and Conditions</title><p>Jayabal, Natarajan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref43">43</xref>] studied the impacts on usability of “tool wear for hybrid composites, E Glass and Natural Coir Fiber, utilizing a drill machine”, of drilling parameters for example drill bit diameter, feed rates as well as the spindle speed. Feed rate has also been observed to have a more essential purpose than other factors in the instrument wear mechanism because of hole size and the fibers contracted in composites. Between feed rate and drill bit diameter, more effective interaction on machinability was found. The optimal level for achieving a minimum tool wear value (0.2 mm/rv feed rate; 1.503 RPM spindle speed and 8mm diameter) has also been determined.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of treatment on machinability of natural fibers reinforced polymeric composites</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Researcher</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Natural Fiber</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Matrix</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Findings</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mylsamy and Rajendran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref48">48</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agave</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epoxy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5% NaOH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Rough surfaces have been observed &#183; voids have been noticed in the untreated composite</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Athijayamani, Thiruchitrambalam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref55">55</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Roselle Sisal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polyester</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10% NaOH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; Gradual weight loss has been observed &#183; alkali-treated composite samples showed superior wear performance</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nam, Ogihara [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref54">54</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coir</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >butylene succinate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5% NaOH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; increased surface roughness with increasing immersing time</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of fiber physical properties on machinability of natural fibers reinforced polymeric composites</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Researcher</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Natural Fiber</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Matrix</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Physical Properties</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Findings</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mylsamy and Rajendran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref48">48</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agave</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epoxy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fiber length (3 mm - 10 mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; 3 mm fiber length was found to be optimum &#183; 3 mm showed better dimensional accuracy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Athijayamani, Thiruchitrambalam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref55">55</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Roselle Sisal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polyester</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >fiber content (5%, 10%, 20%, and 30%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#183; 30 wt% fiber content showed better dimensional accuracy</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Jayabal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref43">43</xref>] studied the drilling parameters’ impacts, for example, spindle speed, feed rate, drill bit diameter, on machinability in terms of natural coir fiber, E-glass and tool wear for hybrid composites, utilizing a drill machine. The feed rate was observed to have a more essential purpose than other factors in the tool wear mechanism because of the hole size and the fibers contracted in composites. The negligibility of the impacts on machinability of spindle speed as well as drill bit diameter parameters has been because of composite softness. The most efficient interaction on machinability has been observed to be between feed rate along with drill bit diameter. In addition, the optimum levels for attaining a minimum value have been found for tool wear (0.2 mm/rev feed rate, 1503 RPM spindle speed, 8 mm diameter).</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Effect of Coupling Agents</title><p>No works have been reported about the coupling agent’s effects on natural fiber/polymer composites’ machinability. Nevertheless, few works describe the tribological nature of these materials, as well as surface roughness, which is also considered in described studies. The efficacy of many coupling agents, which are utilized for enhancing the interface between matrix along with fiber, in changing the interface by forming a bond among composite components has drawn considerable attention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref58">58</xref>]. For example, vinyl tris (2-methoxy) silane and methacryloxypropyltrimethoxy silane are two coupling agents that were utilized in current research for changing the surface of fibers properties. The fiber’s compatibility with the utilization of polymeric matrix may also be enhanced using these coupling agents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref101">101</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref103">103</xref>].</p><p>Demir, Atikler [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117567-ref53">53</xref>] analyzed the impacts of silane coupling agents for polypropylene-luffa fiber, specifically AS am (inopropyltriethoxy silane) and MS (mercapto silane), on machinability as measured by Ra. A silane layer was used to raise the coverage of the fiber surfaces, which resulted in lower Ra values (88 nm and 85 nm, respectively) than untreated composite (138 nm). This was due to the increased coverage of the fiber surfaces by the silane layer.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions and Future Perspective</title><p>Machinability and mechanical properties of natural fiber-reinforced composites were reviewed according to many parameters such as chemical treatment, fiber orientation, volume fraction of fiber, physical properties of fibers and operating parameters. The main findings of this research are concluded in the following points:</p><p>1) NaOH concentration influences the strength of the fibers significantly, as well as the interfacial adhesion of the fiber with the matrix. This has been found that by removing surface tissues, decreasing moisture absorption as well as rising the Ra, the natural fibers’ chemical treatment enhanced their matrix compatibility. This also improved the composites’ mechanical properties. The length of time chosen for the chemical treatment has been a crucial consideration. The mechanical properties raised when the treatment continued longer but having risen to maximum, they would then fall. Mostly NaOH chemical has been utilized at various concentrations.</p><p>2) For controlling the composites’ mechanical properties, fiber Orientation has an essential role to play. For controlling the composites’ mechanical properties, fiber Orientation has an essential role to play. It was noticed in separate experiments that longitudinal fiber orientation gives more flexural strengths as well as higher tensile than its counterpart with transverse orientation.</p><p>3) According to several studies, increasing fiber V<sub>f</sub> can improve mechanical properties as well as other properties. Fiber clotting, on the other hand, occurs when V<sub>f</sub> exceeds a certain level; as a result, the applied loads cannot be distributed properly, resulting in poorer mechanical properties. Thus, to strengthen the composite the fiber V<sub>f</sub> value must be optimized.</p><p>4) According to the findings, certain fibers’ physical properties such as fiber’s quality distributed in the matrix; diameter, length as well as the size of fiber; porosity; “moisture absorption; and how fibers break throughout compounding with the matrix all have an effect” on the composites’ mechanical properties. Furthermore, fiber’s aspect ratio (L/D) has an impact on the composite material’s mechanical properties. Findings also have revealed that decreasing the length of Kraft fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites resulted in increases in impact strength, tensile strength along with Young’s modulus.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Shalwan, A., Alsaeed, T. and Yousif, B. (2022) Machinability of Polymeric Composites and Future Reinforcements—A Review. Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, 10, 40-72. https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2022.105004</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.117567-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alajmi, R., et al. (2019) Study the Possibility of Using Sisal Fibres in Building Applications. https://doi.org/10.5185/amlett.2019.2178</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Azad, N., Asril, M.F.M. and Shah, M.K.M. (2021) A Review on Development of Natural Fibre Composites for Construction Applications. Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, 9, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2021.97001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hung, N., Venkatesh, V. and Loh, N. (1998) Cutting Tools for Metal Matrix Composites. Key Engineering Materials, 138-140, 289-326. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.138-140.289</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davim, J.P. and Reis, P. (2004) Machinability Study on Composite (Polyetheretherketone Reinforced with 30% Glass Fibre-PEEK GF 30) Using Polycrystalline Diamond (PCD) and Cemented Carbide (K20) Tools. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 23, 412-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1779-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davim, J.P., et al. (2010) Machinability Evaluation in Unreinforced and Reinforced PEEK Composites Using Response Surface Models. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 23, 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705709093503</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, A.L. and Prakash, M. (2021) The Effect of Fiber Orientation on Mechanical Properties and Machinability of GFRP Composites by End Milling Using Cutting Force Analysis. Polymers and Polymer Composites, 29, S178-S187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967391121991289</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jawaid, M. and Khalil, H.A. (2011) Cellulosic/Synthetic Fibre Reinforced Polymer Hybrid Composites: A Review. Carbohydrate Polymers, 86, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beg, M. and Pickering, K. (2008) Mechanical Performance of Kraft Fibre Reinforced Polypropylene Composites: Influence of Fibre Length, Fibre Beating and Hygrothermal Ageing. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 39, 1748-1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.08.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jain, V., Choudhury, S. and Ramesh, K. (2002) On the Machining of Alumina and Glass. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42, 1269-1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00241-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, M.A. and Kumar, A.S. (2011) Machinability of Glass Fibre Reinforced Plastic (GFRP) Composite Using Alumina-Based Ceramic Cutting Tools. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 13, 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2010.10.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bouafif, H., et al. (2009) Effects of Fiber Characteristics on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Wood Plastic Composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 40, 1975-1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.06.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le Tro&amp;#235dec, M., et al. (2011) Influence of Chemical Treatments on Adhesion Properties of Hemp Fibres. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 356, 303-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2010.12.066</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brahim, S.B. and Cheikh, R.B. (2007) Influence of Fibre Orientation and Volume Fraction on the Tensile Properties of Unidirectional Alfa-Polyester Composite. Composites Science and Technology, 67, 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mata, F., et al. (2009) Influence of Cutting Conditions on Machinability Aspects of PEEK, PEEK CF 30 and PEEK GF 30 Composites Using PCD Tools. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209, 1980-1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.04.060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Albuquerque, A., et al. (2000) Effect of Wettability and Ageing Conditions on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Uniaxially Oriented Jute-Roving-Reinforced Polyester Composites. Composites Science and Technology, 60, 833-844. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00188-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nirmal, U., et al. (2011) On the Effect of Different Polymer Matrix and Fibre Treatment on Single Fibre Pullout Test Using Betelnut Fibres. Materials &amp; Design, 32, 2717-2726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azmi, A. (2012) Machinability Study of Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites. ResearchSpace@, Auckland.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghidossi, P., El Mansori, M. and Pierron, F. (2006) Influence of Specimen Preparation by Machining on the Failure of Polymer Matrix Off-Axis Tensile Coupons. Composites Science and Technology, 66, 1857-1872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsao, C. and Chiu, Y. (2011) Evaluation of Drilling Parameters on Thrust Force in Drilling Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) Composite Laminates Using Compound Core-Special Drills. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 51, 740-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.05.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shyha, I., et al. (2010) Effect of Laminate Configuration and Feed Rate on Cutting Performance When Drilling Holes in Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic Composites. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 210, 1023-1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.02.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ochi, S. (2008) Mechanical Properties of Kenaf Fibers and Kenaf/PLA Composites. Mechanics of Materials, 40, 446-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.10.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lotfi, A., Li, H. and Dao, D.V. (2018) Effect of Drilling Parameters on Delamination and Hole Quality in Drilling Flax Fiber Reinforced Bio-Composites. In: International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing, Springer, Berlin, 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04290-5_8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adeleye, A.T., et al. (2020) Sustainable Synthesis and Applications of Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) from Biomass. Process Biochemistry, 96, 174-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2020.05.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shalwan, A. and Yousif, B. (2013) In State of Art: Mechanical and Tribological Behaviour of Polymeric Composites Based on Natural Fibres. Materials &amp; Design, 48, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stone, C., et al. (2020) Natural or Synthetic—How Global Trends in Textile Usage Threaten Freshwater Environments. Science of the Total Environment, 718, Article ID: 134689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134689</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bartl, A. (2020) Chapter 10. Textiles Production and End-of-Life Management Options. In: Letcher, T.M., Ed., Plastic Waste and Recycling, Academic Press, Cambridge, 251-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817880-5.00010-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Ramachandra Rao, S. (2006) Chapter 11. Recycling of Water and Reagents. In: Rao, S.R., Ed., Waste Management Series, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 459-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0713-2743(06)80096-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wiedemann, S.G., et al. (2020) Environmental Impacts Associated with the Production, Use, and End-of-Life of a Woollen Garment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25, 1486-1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01766-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dunne, R., et al. (2016) A Review of Natural Fibres, Their Sustainability and Automotive Applications. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 35, 1041-1050. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684416633898</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karimah, A., et al. (2021) A Review on Natural Fibers for Development of Eco-Friendly Bio-Composite: Characteristics, and Utilizations. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 13, 2442-2458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rashkovan, I. and Korabel’nikov, Y.G. (1997) The Effect of Fiber Surface Treatment on Its Strength and Adhesion to the Matrix. Composites Science and Technology, 57, 1017-1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00153-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prasad, A.R. and Rao, K.M. (2011) Mechanical Properties of Natural Fibre Reinforced Polyester Composites: Jowar, Sisal and Bamboo. Materials &amp; Design, 32, 4658-4663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nurazzi, N., et al. (2021) Treatments of Natural Fiber as Reinforcement in Polymer Composites—A Short Review. Functional Composites and Structures, 3, Article ID: 024002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-6331/abff36</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hariprasad, K., et al. (2020) Acoustic and Mechanical Characterisation of Polypropylene Composites Reinforced by Natural Fibres for Automotive Applications. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 9, 14029-14035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.112</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balla, V.K., et al. (2019) Additive Manufacturing of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites: Processing and Prospects. Composites Part B: Engineering, 174, Article ID: 106956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sever, K., et al. (2012) Surface Treatments of Jute Fabric: The Influence of Surface Characteristics on Jute Fabrics and Mechanical Properties of Jute/Polyester Composites. Industrial Crops and Products, 35, 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.05.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le Troedec, M., et al. (2008) Influence of Various Chemical Treatments on the Composition and Structure of Hemp Fibres. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 39, 514-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takeyama, H. and Iijima, N. (1988) Machinability of Glassfiber Reinforced Plastics and Application of Ultrasonic Machining. CIRP Annals, 37, 93-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61593-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Virk, A.S., Hall, W. and Summerscales, J. (2010) Failure Strain as the Key Design Criterion for Fracture of Natural Fibre Composites. Composites Science and Technology, 70, 995-999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.02.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zafeiropoulos, N., et al. (2002) Engineering and Characterisation of the Interface in Flax Fibre/Polypropylene Composite Materials. Part I. Development and Investigation of Surface Treatments. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 33, 1083-1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00082-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alawar, A., Hamed, A.M. and Al-Kaabi, K. (2009) Characterization of Treated Date Palm Tree Fiber as Composite Reinforcement. Composites Part B: Engineering, 40, 601-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rao, K.M.M. and Rao, K.M. (2007) Extraction and Tensile Properties of Natural Fibers: Vakka, Date and Bamboo. Composite Structures, 77, 288-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jayabal, S., Natarajan, U. and Sekar, U. (2011) Regression Modeling and Optimization of Machinability Behavior of Glass-Coir-Polyester Hybrid Composite Using Factorial Design Methodology. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 55, 263-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-3030-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Medina, L., Schledjewski, R. and Schlarb, A.K. (2009) Process Related Mechanical Properties of Press Molded Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymers. Composites Science and Technology, 69, 1404-1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coutinho, F.M. and Costa, T.H. (1999) Performance of Polypropylene-Wood Fiber Composites. Polymer Testing, 18, 581-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9418(98)00056-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, J., et al. (2000) Effect of Fiber Pretreatment Condition on the Interfacial Strength and Mechanical Properties of Wood Fiber/PP Composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 76, 1000-1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000516)76:7&lt;1000::AID-APP3&gt;3.0.CO;2-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Colom, X., et al. (2003) Effects of Different Treatments on the Interface of HDPE/ Lignocellulosic Fiber Composites. Composites Science and Technology, 63, 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00248-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mylsamy, K. and Rajendran, I. (2011) Influence of Alkali Treatment and Fibre Length on Mechanical Properties of Short Agave Fibre Reinforced Epoxy Composites. Materials &amp; Design, 32, 4629-4640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okubo, K., Fujii, T. and Yamamoto, Y. (2004) Development of Bamboo-Based Polymer Composites and Their Mechanical Properties. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 35, 377-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bilba, K., Arsène, M.-A. and Ouensanga, A. (2003) Sugar Cane Bagasse Fibre Reinforced Cement Composites. Part I. Influence of the Botanical Components of Bagasse on the Setting of Bagasse/Cement Composite. Cement and Concrete Composites, 25, 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00003-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, W., et al. (2007) Influence of Processing Methods and Fiber Length on Physical Properties of Kenaf Fiber Reinforced Soy Based Biocomposites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 38, 352-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.05.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edeerozey, A.M., et al. (2007) Chemical Modification of Kenaf Fibers. Materials Letters, 61, 2023-2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2006.08.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Demir, H., et al. (2006) The Effect of Fiber Surface Treatments on the Tensile and Water Sorption Properties of Polypropylene-Luffa Fiber Composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 37, 447-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nam, T.H., et al. (2011) Effect of Alkali Treatment on Interfacial and Mechanical Properties of Coir Fiber Reinforced Poly(butylene succinate) Biodegradable Composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 42, 1648-1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Athijayamani, A., et al. (2010) Influence of Alkali-Treated Fibers on the Mechanical Properties and Machinability of Roselle and Sisal Fiber Hybrid Polyester Composite. Polymer Composites, 31, 723-731. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.20853</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valadez-Gonzalez, A., et al. (1999) Effect of Fiber Surface Treatment on the Fiber-Matrix Bond Strength of Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 30, 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00054-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mizobuchi, A., et al. (2008) Drilling Machinability of Resin-Less Green Composites Reinforced by Bamboo Fiber. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 97, 185-194. https://doi.org/10.2495/HPSM080201</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van de Weyenberg, I., et al. (2006) Improving the Properties of UD Flax Fibre Reinforced Composites by Applying an Alkaline Fibre Treatment. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 37, 1368-1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.08.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rokbi, M., et al. (2011) Effect of Chemical Treatment on Flexure Properties of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polyester Composite. Procedia Engineering, 10, 2092-2097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.346</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siakeng, R., et al. (2020) Alkali Treated Coir/Pineapple Leaf Fibres Reinforced PLA Hybrid Composites: Evaluation of Mechanical, Morphological, Thermal and Physical Properties. eXPRESS Polymer Letters, 14, 717-730. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2020.59</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saha, P., et al. (2010) Enhancement of Tensile Strength of Lignocellulosic Jute Fibers by Alkali-Steam Treatment. Bioresource Technology, 101, 3182-3187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eichhorn, S., et al. (2001) Current International Research into Cellulosic Fibres and Composites. Journal of Materials Science, 36, 2107-2131. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017512029696</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdul Karim, M.R., et al. (2020) Sodium Carbonate Treatment of Fibres to Improve Mechanical and Water Absorption Characteristics of short Bamboo Natural Fibres Reinforced Polyester Composite. Plastics, Rubber and Composites, 49, 425-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/14658011.2020.1768336</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zalinawati, M., et al. (2020) The Effect of Fibre Treatment on Water Absorption and Mechanical Properties of Buri Palm (Corypha utan) Fibre Reinforced Epoxy Composites. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, 14, 7379-7388. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.14.4.2020.06.0580</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kabir, M., et al. (2012) Mechanical Properties of Chemically-Treated Hemp Fibre Reinforced Sandwich Composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 43, 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.06.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arrakhiz, F., et al. (2012) Mechanical Properties of High Density Polyethylene Reinforced with Chemically Modified Coir Fibers: Impact of Chemical Treatments. Materials &amp; Design, 37, 379-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Merlini, C., Soldi, V. and Barra, G.M. (2011) Influence of Fiber Surface Treatment and Length on Physico-Chemical Properties of Short Random Banana Fiber-Reinforced Castor Oil Polyurethane Composites. Polymer Testing, 30, 833-840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.08.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Azad, N., Mojutan, E.C. and Shah, M.K.M. (2021) A Mini Review on Natural Fiber Honeycomb (NFH) Sandwiched Structure Composite: Flexural Performance Perspective. Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, 9, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2021.95001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mallick, P.K. (2007) Fiber-Reinforced Composites: Materials, Manufacturing, and Design. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420005981</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yousif, B. (2010) Effect of Oil Palm Fibres Volume Fraction on Mechanical Properties of Polyester Composites. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 24, 4459-4470. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979210056633</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ku, H., et al. (2011) A Review on the Tensile Properties of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 42, 856-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wen, L., Lei, W.-G. and Chao, R. (2006) Effect of Volume Fraction of Ramie Cloth on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Ramie Cloth/UP Resin Composite. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 16, s474-s477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(06)60237-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, X., Yu, J. and Kennedy, J.F. (2005) Studies on the Properties of Natural Fibers-Reinforced Thermoplastic Starch Composites. Carbohydrate Polymers, 62, 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.07.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aguado-Deblas, L., et al. (2020) Outlook for Direct Use of Sunflower and Castor Oils as Biofuels in Compression Ignition Diesel Engines, Being Part of Diesel/Ethyl Acetate/Straight Vegetable Oil Triple Blends. Energies, 13, 4836. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184836</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van de Weyenberg, I., et al. (2003) Influence of Processing and Chemical Treatment of Flax Fibres on Their Composites. Composites Science and Technology, 63, 1241-1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00093-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yousif, B., et al. (2012) Flexural Properties of Treated and Untreated Kenaf/Epoxy Composites. Materials &amp; Design, 40, 378-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mamidi, S.V.S. (2012) Manufacturing an Involute Spline Cutting Tool on Wire EDM Using SolidWorks and ESPRIT. California State University, Northridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Müller, C.M., Laurindo, J.B. and Yamashita, F. (2009) Effect of Cellulose Fibers Addition on the Mechanical Properties and Water Vapor Barrier of Starch-Based Films. Food Hydrocolloids, 23, 1328-1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.09.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bras, J., et al. (2010) Mechanical, Barrier, and Biodegradability Properties of Bagasse Cellulose Whiskers Reinforced Natural Rubber Nanocomposites. Industrial Crops and Products, 32, 627-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.07.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alshammari, F., et al. (2018) The Influence of Fibre Orientation on Tribological Performance of Jute Fibre Reinforced Epoxy Composites Considering Different mat Orientations. Tribology in Industry, 40, 335-348. https://doi.org/10.24874/ti.2018.40.03.01</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Herrera-Franco, P.J. and Valadez-González, A. (2004) Mechanical Properties of Continuous Natural Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 35, 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jacob, M., Thomas, S. and Varughese, K.T. (2004) Mechanical Properties of Sisal/ Oil Palm Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Natural Rubber Composites. Composites Science and Technology, 64, 955-965. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00261-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khashaba, U., et al. (2010) Machinability Analysis in Drilling Woven GFR/Epoxy Composites: Part I. Effect of Machining Parameters. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 41, 391-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Madsen, B. and Lilholt, H. (2003) Physical and Mechanical Properties of Unidirectional Plant Fibre Composites—An Evaluation of the Influence of Porosity. Composites Science and Technology, 63, 1265-1272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00097-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Migneault, S., et al. (2009) Effects of Processing Method and Fiber Size on the Structure and Properties of Wood-Plastic Composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 40, 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oda, S., Fernandes Jr., J.L. and Ildefonso, J.S. (2012) Analysis of Use of Natural Fibers and Asphalt Rubber Binder in Discontinuous Asphalt Mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 26, 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tarfaoui, M., Choukri, S. and Nême, A. (2008) Effect of Fibre Orientation on Mechanical Properties of the Laminated Polymer Composites Subjected to Out-of-Plane High Strain Rate Compressive Loadings. Composites Science and Technology, 68, 477-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oksman, K., et al. (2009) The Influence of Fibre Microstructure on Fibre Breakage and Mechanical Properties of Natural Fibre Reinforced Polypropylene. Composites Science and Technology, 69, 1847-1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bahl, S. (2021) Fiber Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites—A Review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 39, 317-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.423</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsao, C. and Hocheng, H. (2008) Evaluation of Thrust Force and Surface Roughness in Drilling Composite Material Using Taguchi Analysis and Neural Network. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 203, 342-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.126</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hocheng, H. and Tsao, C. (2003) Comprehensive Analysis of Delamination in Drilling of Composite Materials with Various Drill Bits. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 140, 335-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00749-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faruk, O., et al. (2012) Biocomposites Reinforced with Natural Fibers: 2000-2010. Progress in Polymer Science, 37, 1552-1596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khashaba, U., et al. (2010) Machinability Analysis in Drilling Woven GFR/Epoxy Composites: Part II Effect of Drill Wear. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 41, 1130-1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.04.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kini, M.V. and Chincholkar, A. (2010) Effect of Machining Parameters on Surface Roughness and Material Removal Rate in Finish Turning of ±30 Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer Pipes. Materials &amp; Design, 31, 3590-3598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Sonbaty, I., Khashaba, U. and Machaly, T. (2004) Factors Affecting the Machinability of GFR/Epoxy Composites. Composite Structures, 63, 329-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00181-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krishnaraj, V., et al. (2012) Optimization of Machining Parameters at High Speed Drilling of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) Laminates. Composites Part B: Engineering, 43, 1791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davim, J., Gaitonde, V. and Karnik, S. (2011) Erratum: Machinability Evaluation in Unreinforced and Reinforced PEEK Composites Using Response Surface Models (Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials (2010) 23:1 DOI: 10.1177/ 0892705709093503). Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 24, 299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705709093503</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le Duc, A., Vergnes, B. and Budtova, T. (2011) Polypropylene/Natural Fibres Composites: Analysis of Fibre Dimensions after Compounding and Observations of Fibre Rupture by Rheo-Optics. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 42, 1727-1737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brahmakumar, M., Pavithran, C. and Pillai, R. (2005) Coconut Fibre Reinforced Polyethylene Composites: Effect of Natural Waxy Surface Layer of the Fibre on Fibre/Matrix Interfacial Bonding and Strength of Composites. Composites Science and Technology, 65, 563-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harper, L., et al. (2007) Characterisation of Random Carbon Fibre Composites from a Directed Fibre Preforming Process: The Effect of Tow Filamentisation. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 38, 755-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.09.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yemele, M.C.N., et al. (2010) Effect of Bark Fiber Content and Size on the Mechanical Properties of Bark/HDPE Composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 41, 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.06.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grande, C. and Torres, F. (2005) Investigation of Fiber Organization and Damage during Single Screw Extrusion of Natural Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastics. Advances in Polymer Technology: Journal of the Polymer Processing Institute, 24, 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.20037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yam, K.L., et al. (1990) Composites from Compounding Wood Fibers with Recycled High Density Polyethylene. Polymer Engineering &amp; Science, 30, 693-699. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760301109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palanikumar, K. (2011) Experimental Investigation and Optimisation in Drilling of GFRP Composites. Measurement, 44, 2138-2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2011.07.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gaitonde, V., et al. (2008) Analysis of Parametric Influence on Delamination in High-Speed Drilling of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic Composites. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 203, 431-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.050</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palanikumar, K. (2007) Modeling and Analysis for Surface Roughness in Machining Glass Fibre Reinforced Plastics Using Response Surface Methodology. Materials &amp; Design, 28, 2611-2618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.10.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Velayudham, A., Krishnamurthy, R. and Soundarapandian, T. (2005) Evaluation of Drilling Characteristics of High Volume Fraction Fibre Glass Reinforced Polymeric Composite. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 45, 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.09.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arib, R., et al. (2006) Mechanical Properties of Pineapple Leaf Fibre Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. Materials &amp; Design, 27, 391-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aziz, S.H. and Ansell, M.P. (2004) The Effect of Alkalization and Fibre Alignment on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Kenaf and Hemp Bast Fibre Composites: Part 1 Polyester Resin Matrix. Composites Science and Technology, 64, 1219-1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Basu, G., et al. (2012) Potentiality for Value-Added Technical Use of Indian Sisal. Industrial Crops and Products, 36, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.08.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ciftci, I., Turker, M. and Seker, U. (2004) Evaluation of Tool Wear When Machining SiCp-Reinforced Al-2014 Alloy Matrix Composites. Materials &amp; Design, 25, 251-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2003.09.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arul, S., et al. (2006) The Effect of Vibratory Drilling on Hole Quality in Polymeric Composites. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 46, 252-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.05.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117567-ref113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ScienceDirect.com|Science, Health and Medical Journals, Full Text Articles and Books. https://www.sciencedirect.com</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>