<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2022.125037</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-117435</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Why Do Pregnant Women Choose a Planned Caesarean Section in Burkina Faso? A Qualitative Study
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nestor</surname><given-names>Bationo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Noufou</surname><given-names>G. Nana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adama</surname><given-names>Ouattara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Patrice</surname><given-names>A. Ngangue</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dieudonné</surname><given-names>Soubeiga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>Kabore</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maxime</surname><given-names>Drabo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique, Ouagadougou, Burkina-Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Institut de Formation et de Recherche Interdisciplinaires en Sciences de la Santé et de l’Education, Ouagadougou, Burkina-Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Université Joseph Ki-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina-Faso</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>05</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>408</fpage><lpage>416</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>29,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Despite the complications related to the caesarean section, some couples choose it by desirability. This study aimed to understand the reasons for maternal requests for a planned caesarean section in Burkina Faso, in the absence of obstetric indications.<b> </b>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted in March 2019, consisting of twelve semi-structured interviews with women requesting caesarean section at Tingandogo Teaching Hospital in Burkina Faso. The operative reports were also examined. Thematic analysis based on Braun and Clarke approach was performed with QDA Miner software.<b> </b>Twelve patients were involved in the study. The mean age was 33 years. The majority had a higher level of education. Half were employees. The mean stay duration was 72 hours, with an estimated cost of CFA 300.000 (457,347 EUR). The choice of a planned caesarean was motivated by fear of birth (tokophobia), the positive feeling associated to the surgical technology, the doctor-patient relationship and the confidence in the quality of healthcare services such as reception and hygiene.<b> </b>Maternal reasons for requesting a planned caesarean section in Burkina Faso are multifactorial. Information, education and communication and shared decision-making strategies concerning the different modes of delivery and complications at the end of pregnancy, may contribute to reducing this problem.  
  
   
    
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Caesarean Section</kwd><kwd> Maternal Request</kwd><kwd> Qualitative Study</kwd><kwd> Tokophobia</kwd><kwd> Burkina-Faso</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The complications associated with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref2">2</xref>] caesarean section continue to grow worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref3">3</xref>]. Developed and developing countries are both concerned by this rise [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref5">5</xref>]. The caesarean section is clinically required in order to reduce maternal and infantile deaths. In a Nigerian study only 7 (3.3%) attributed refusal of caesarean section to the complications of the procedure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref6">6</xref>]. Except for clinical reasons, the benefits of caesarean section are not asserted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref8">8</xref>]. The optimal rate of caesarean section to mitigate the risks of maternal and neonatal complications recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) is 15% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref7">7</xref>]. However, in most resource-limited countries such as Burkina Faso, the rate of caesarean section is above the WHO recommendations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref9">9</xref>]. In Africa, the caesarean section rate is about 5% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref10">10</xref>] with unequal access among the regions and disparate indications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref11">11</xref>]. Worse still, planned caesarean sections without medical indications (desirable caesarean section or caesarean section by convenience) are gaining in importance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref13">13</xref>]. Women are steadily claiming planned caesarean section as their rights [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref14">14</xref>]. In 18.5 million of caesarean section carried out in the world about a third of them is performed without medical indications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref1">1</xref>]. Then the caesarean section makes women physically, economically and socially vulnerable in resource-limited contexts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref11">11</xref>]. In Burkina Faso, the rate of caesarean section rose from 0.7% in 2003 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref15">15</xref>] to 2.2% in 2017 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref16">16</xref>], and the highest rates of caesarean section performed without medical reasons were recorded in private hospitals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref17">17</xref>]. Few studies explain women’s motivation to choose a planned caesarean section without medical indications in Burkina Faso. This growing issue should prompt health authorities. This article aimed to understand the maternal reasons for requesting a planned caesarean section at Tingandogo Teaching Hospital in Burkina Faso.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design</title><p>A qualitative descriptive design was applied to this study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Participants</title><p>Reasoned sampling was used to select the participants. Participants were delivered women who had planned a caesarean section by convenience. In order to achieve theoretical saturation, twelve participants were selected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref18">18</xref>]. The first step for participants’ recruitment was to consult the medical records of women who gave birth by caesarean section to identify those who had chosen it for convenience. Subsequently, the women were contacted by telephone to ask them to participate in the study. An appointment for an interview at their convenient location was made with those who accepted. Included in the study were patients who: 1) were notified as a case of elective caesarean section, 2) chose elective caesarean section and 3) agreed to participate in the study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Collection</title><p>An interview guide developed iteratively and pretested was used to ensure the reliability and consistency in the data collection. In the interview guide, the main themes were facilitating factors, predisposing factors and services. These themes were the different dimensions from Andersen and Newman’s model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref19">19</xref>] and included sub-themes and follow-up questions. Interviews were conducted in French and transcribed verbatim.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Analysis</title><p>An inductive thematic analysis based on the six steps of Braun and Clarke was performed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref20">20</xref>]. The principal investigator (NB) read through all transcripts and identified possible themes (step 1). NB developed a coding scheme inductively from the data based on an independent review of three transcripts. Agreement on a final coding scheme was reached by discussions with the research team. NB used this to code all transcripts using QDA Miner software of Provalis to assist with data management (step 2). Together, NB and PN discussed and identified recurring and converging themes across participants. The refined themes were then discussed and agreed upon with other members of the research team (steps 3 and 4). Finally, each theme was named, defined and a written report generated. Key quotes that illustrated each theme were extrapolated from the data (steps 5 and 6).</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Ethical Considerations</title><p>The research ethics committee of the Burkina Faso health ministry approved the study (N˚2019-3-023). The hospital manager gave an agreement. Each participant has signed a written consent form. We have certified anonymous data collection and ensured participants confidentiality.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Twelve (12) participants were involved in the study with a mean age of 33 years, half were employees; and the majority were married. Paucigravida were highly represented (n = 8). Two participants had benefited from only one caesarean section. The mean stay duration was 72 hours, with an estimated cost of FCFA 300.000 (457,347 EUR). Characteristics of the participants are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>Three major themes have emerged from the data analysis. These themes can be grouped into individual, interpersonal and organizational factors.</p><p>- Tokophobia and planned desirable caesarean section</p><p>The request of a maternal caesarean section without medical indication is motivated by the fear of vaginal delivery. Furthermore, the caesarean section is viewed only through its positive aspect. According to the participants, vaginal bleeding increases their doubts as future mothers and child safety during delivery:</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of participants</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective (N = 12)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Profession</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Employees</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traders</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Matrimonial status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Free union</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ouagadougou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of pregnancies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 - 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of childbirth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 - 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of only caesarean section</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.67</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>“My choice of the planned caesarean section based on just what I know. The nasty comments about vaginal delivery finally convinced me. I fear losing my baby” (Participant 2).</p><p>Other women were afraid that vaginal delivery would cause undesirable aesthetic changes to their body and for negative impacts on their relationship:</p><p>“There are many advantages to choosing a caesarean section today. For example, we avoid long labour, tears […] the men will not cheat anymore because of body changes (laughs) […] the vaginal delivery leads to enlargements which can cause quarrels in the couple” (Participant 11).</p><p>- The doctor-patient relationship and planned desirable caesarean section</p><p>Participants are also motivated by their beliefs in the mastery and use of surgical techniques and technology by physicians. This conviction leads to an assurance of safe delivery and giving birth to a healthy baby.</p><p>“Nowadays this is possible, and our doctors are used to do it like in Europe. It is necessary to notice that the surgical material is adequate and reassure me. Techniques used in caesarean section contribute to rely trust on the practice” (Participant 4).</p><p>- Healthcare services and planned desirable caesarean section</p><p>Results have revealed that the quality of healthcare services is very important in the choice of a caesarean section. The quality of health facilities infrastructures such as hygiene, technical skills, and legal structure recognition have influenced future mothers in their choice of a planned caesarean section.</p><p>“A clean hospital, we are at least sure to get out without a nosocomial disease…I mean Infection. Moreover, you know, our hospital must be clean; in any case about my caesarean section I do not want to drag and bear a wound that will fester afterwards and become a problem for me, my child and husband too” (Participant 8).</p><p>Women have stated that doctor-pregnant woman communication contributes to the choice of a planned caesarean section when the decision is taken.</p><p>“At the last antenatal visit, I informed my gynaecologist about my decision to benefit from a caesarean section. He agreed and has not objected to my request. He just said that I have to provide a check-up at the right time, and that was done” (Participant 5).</p><p>The quotes based on reasons for requesting planned caesarean were presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Quotes based on reasons for requesting planned caesarean</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >reasons for requesting planned caesarean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Illustrative quotes</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Tokophobia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“My choice of the planned caesarean section based on just what I know. The nasty comments about vaginal delivery finally convinced me. I fear losing my baby” (Participant 2).</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >“There are many advantages to choosing a caesarean section today. For example, we avoid long labour, tears […] the men will not cheat anymore because of body changes (laughs) […] the vaginal delivery leads to enlargements which can cause quarrels in the couple” (Participant 11).</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >beliefs in the mastery and use of surgical techniques and technology by physicians</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“Nowadays this is possible, and our doctors are used to do it like in Europe. It is necessary to notice that the surgical material is adequate and reassure me. Techniques used in caesarean section contribute to rely trust on the practice” (Participant 4).</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Quality of healthcare services</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >“A clean hospital, we are at least sure to get out without a nosocomial disease I mean Infection. Moreover, you know, our hospital must be clean; in any case about my caesarean section I do not want to drag and bear a wound that will fester afterwards and become a problem for me, my child and husband too” (Participant 8).</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >“At the last antenatal visit, I informed my gynaecologist about my decision to benefit from a caesarean section. He agreed and has not objected my request. He just said that I have to provide a check-up at the right time, and that was done” (Participant 5).</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>This study aimed to understand the maternal reasons for requesting a planned caesarean section in a Burkina Faso teaching hospital. Results have shown that the reasons for choosing a planned caesarean section are multifactorial. Tokophobia (intense fear of childbirth and is the main psychological cause) associated with a lack of knowledge about caesarean section indications and consequences was the major motivator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref22">22</xref>]. In addition, participants have viewed the hospital technical equipment as a positive contributor to request for a planned caesarean section. The hospital characteristics such as the quality of healthcare and the pregnant women confidence in the judgement of their doctor have also influenced the decision to request a planned caesarean.</p><p>A large part of caesarean section cases could be avoided if a birth plan is set up by the gynaecologist and the expecting mother [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref22">22</xref>]. The concept of emergency caesarean section scares women which pushes them to take the lead by choosing caesarean section in advance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref23">23</xref>]. The delivery preparation can also help mothers to improve their knowledge if its proceedings count in the process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref24">24</xref>]. Other reasons root in the planned caesarean section choice in fear of vaginal delivery pain, the family pressure, poor previous experience, seek of better healthcare services in order to keep pelvic floor integrity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref24">24</xref>].</p><p>Our results have shown that technology induces the caesarean section choice by participants and appears nowadays to be a safe way to avoid complications to the mother and child during the delivery. Surgical techniques, anaesthesia, asepsis, antibiotic therapy and caesarean section enabling maternal safety have always moved up [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref25">25</xref>]. Some mothers and caregivers think that technology can prevent a set of risks bound to pregnancy and childbirth. Confidence in medical technology and modernity hide the risk lies in any surgery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref14">14</xref>]. In Brasilia, the protected side of the caesarean section is faced to the static pelvic troubles or sexuality itself, which lead to undermining any positive viewpoint [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref25">25</xref>]. In China, the one-child policy encourages caesarean section practice, which is seen as an optimal safety guaranty for the child [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref25">25</xref>].</p><p>Our findings have shown that the request of a planned caesarean section depends on the doctor communication way about caesarean section and how he describes vaginal delivery. Previous studies had found the same results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref26">26</xref>]. On one hand, the doctor attitude had mattered in the women choice of caesarean section [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref26">26</xref>]. On the other hand, even if the caesarean section was not allowed by medical indication, it was generally admitted through the relationship between doctor-patient [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117435-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>This study contributed to improving knowledge-producing. The qualitative approach made it possible to explore deeply all the factors that influenced a request for a planned C-section. The author’s subjectivity probably impacted data analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>This study allows us to know factors which lead to planned caesarean section choice by future mothers. Planned caesarean section choice comes to be multifactorial. Desire and beliefs are strongly linked to the caesarean section choice coming as an unquestionable means to avoid pain and complications for mother and child during delivery. Additional reasons such as the hospital framework and its performance associated with the available technological equipment, caregivers welcome combined with the facilities hygiene contribute to the caesarean section requests. Furthermore, doctor-patient communication is also not neglecting factor of the planned caesarean section request. Finally, an information, education and communication strategy on the mode of delivery at the end of pregnancy may contribute to reducing this problem. A quantitative study on planned C-section in Burkina Faso could be such a useful contribution by being like a complement to enrich the results.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Funding Sources/Sponsors</title><p>This research received no specific grant from any funding agency.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We acknowledge all colleagues who offered guidance and technical support when this manuscript was being drafted.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Bationo, N., Nana, N.G., Ouattara, A., Ngangue, P.A., Soubeiga, D., Kabore, A. and Drabo, M. (2022) Why Do Pregnant Women Choose a Planned Caesarean Section in Burkina Faso? A Qualitative Study. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12, 408-416. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2022.125037</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.117435-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Souza, J., Lumbiganon, P., Laopaiboon, M., Carroli, G., Fawole, B. and Ruyan, P. (2010) Caesarean Section without Medical Indications Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Adverse Short-Term Maternal Outcomes: The 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Medicine, 8, Article No. 71.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-71</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, H.-Y., Jiang, Q., Shi, H., Xu, Y.-Q., Shi, A.-C., Sun, Y.-L., et al. (2016) Effect of Caesarean Section on Maternal and Foetal Outcomes in Acute Fatty Liver of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Scientific Reports, 6, Article No. 28826. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28826</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Betran, A.P., Torloni, M.R., Zhang, J., Ye, J., Mikolajczyk, R., Deneux-Tharaux, C., et al. (2015) What Is the Optimal Rate of Caesarean Section at Population Level? A Systematic Review of Ecologic Studies. Reproductive Health, 12, 57.  
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4496821  
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vogel, J.P., Betrán, A.P., Vindevoghel, N., Souza, J.P., Torloni, M.R., Zhang, J., et al. (2015) Use of the Robson Classification to Assess Caesarean Section Trends in 21 Countries: A Secondary Analysis of Two WHO Multicountry Surveys. The Lancet Global Health, 3, e260-e270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ye, J., Betrán, A.P., Guerrero Vela, M., Souza, J.P. and Zhang, J. (2014) Searching for the Optimal Rate of Medically Necessary Cesarean Delivery. Birth, 41, 237-244.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ezeonu, P.O., Ekwedigwe, K.C., Isikhuemen, M.E., Eliboh, M.O., Onoh, R.C., Lawani, L.O., et al. (2017) Perception of Caesarean Section among Pregnant Women in a Rural Missionary Hospital. Advances in Reproductive Sciences, 5, 33-38. https://doi.org/10.4236/arsci.2017.53004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cohn, J., Danielsen, L., Inger Mygind Holzer, K., Koch, L., Severin, B., Th&amp;oslash;gersen, S., et al. (1985) A Study of Chilean Refugee Children in Denmark. The Lancet, 326, 437-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92751-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mathai, M., Engelbrecht, S.M., Bonet, M. and Organisation mondiale de la santé, UNICEF (2017) Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth: A Guide for Midwives and Doctors. Second Edition.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2011) Statistiques Sanitaires Mondiales 2011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cavallaro, F.L., Cresswell, J.A., Frana, G.V., Victora, C.G., Barros, A.J. and Ronsmans, C. (2013) Trends in Caesarean Delivery by Country and Wealth Quintile: Cross-Sectional Surveys in Southern Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91, 914-922.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fabienne, R. (2012) La césarienne de qualité au Burkina Faso: Comment penser et agir au-delà de l’acte technique. Université Libre de Bruxelles-Ecole de Santé Publique.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gamble, J.A. and Creedy, D.K. (2000) Women’s Request for a Cesarean Section: A Critique of the Literature. Birth, 27, 256-263.  
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00256.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schantz, C., de Loenzien, M., Goyet, S., Ravit, M., Dancoisne, A. and Dumont, A. (2019) How Is Women’s Demand for Caesarean Section Measured? A Systematic Literature Review. PLoS ONE, 14, e0213352.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213352</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brugeilles, C. (2014) L’accouchement par césarienne, un risque pour les droits reproductifs? Autrepart, 70, 143. https://doi.org/10.3917/autr.070.0143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">INSD, ORC Macro. (2004) Enquête Démographique et de Santé du Burkina Faso 2003. INSD et ORC Macro, Calverton.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministère de la santé (2017) Annuaire statistique.  
http://cns.bf/IMG/pdf/annuaire_ms_2017.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meda, I.B., Millogo, T., Baguiya, A., Ouédraogo/Nikiema, L., Coulibaly, A. and Kouanda, S. (2016) Rate of and Factors Associated with Indications for Cesarean Deliveries: Results of a National Review in Burkina Faso. International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics, 135, S51-S57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.08.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pires, A. (1997) échantillonnage et recherche qualitative: Essai théorique et méthodologique. 88.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andersen, R. and Newman, J.F. (2005) Societal and Individual Determinants of Medical Care Utilization in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 51, 95-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00428.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karlstr&amp;ouml;m, A., Engstr&amp;ouml;m-Olofsson, R., Nystedt, A., Thomas, J. and Hildingsson, I. (2009) Swedish Caregivers’ Attitudes towards Caesarean Section on Maternal Request. Women and Birth, 22, 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2008.12.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okonkwo (2012) Maternal Demand for Cesarean Section: Perception and Willingness to Request by Nigerian Antenatal Clients. International Journal of Women’s Health, 4, 141-148. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S10325</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gagnon, R. (2017) Thèse présentée en vue de l’obtention du grade de Philosophiae Doctor (Ph.D.) en sciences humaines appliquées. Université de Montréal, Montréal.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duperron, L. (2011) Should Patients Be Entitled to Cesarean Section on Demand? Canadian Family Physician, 57, 1246-1248.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carbonne, B. (2013) La césarienne pour tous est-elle pour demain? Médecine de la Reproduction, 15, 48-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117435-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fenwick, J., Staff, L., Gamble, J., Creedy, D.K. and Bayes, S. (2010) Why Do Women Request Caesarean Section in a Normal, Healthy First Pregnancy? Midwifery, 26, 394-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2008.10.011</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>