<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2022.125036</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-117304</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Time Course of Postoperative Complications in Low-Risk Women after Planned Cesarean Section
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anne</surname><given-names>Raabjerg Kruse</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Linn</surname><given-names>Håkonsen Arendt</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christian</surname><given-names>Erikstrup</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ulrik</surname><given-names>Schiøler Kesmodel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Finn</surname><given-names>Friis Lauszus</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Niels</surname><given-names>Uldbjerg</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Iben</surname><given-names>Sundtoft</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Axel</surname><given-names>Forman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Regional Hospital G&amp;amp;oslash;dstrup, Herning, Denmark</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>05</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>394</fpage><lpage>407</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>30,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objectives
  :
  <b> </b>
  Length of hospital stay after cesarean section is today much shorter than previously, and a stay of only 1 day is used in many departments. However, complications requiring immediate treatment must be diagnosed before leaving hospital. We assessed the time interval from planned cesarean section to diagnosis of major complications in low-risk women to estimate a safe time of discharge. <b>Methods</b>
  <b>:</b>
  <b> </b>
  We performed a retrospective observational study among 5633 women undergoing planned cesarean section from 2001
  -
  2017 at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The inclusion criterion was postoperative complication graded as Clavien-Dindo ≥ II. Exclusion criteria were preoperative comorbidity or problems during surgery indicative of need for prolonged stay. Time from cesarean section to suspicion of a postoperative complication was the primary endpoint. <b>Results</b>
  <b>:</b>
   The study population consisted of 116 women with unexpected postoperative complications, 47 classified as Clavien-Dindo II and 69 as Clavien-Dindo III
  -
  IV. In 63 of the 116, the diagnoses were suspected within 24 hours (Clavien-Dindo II: 25, Clavien-Dindo III
  -
  IV: 38). These included all cases of relaparotomy and uterine atony with immediate need of medical treatment. Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction was diagnosed within 2 days, while other complications were suspected and treated 2 to 10 days postoperatively. <b>Conclusions</b>
  <b>:</b>
   Among low-risk women with a postoperative complication, all cases requiring relaparotomy and medically treated uterine atony were suspected within 24 hours after surgery. Discharge 24 hours after planned cesarean section seems safe in low-risk patients.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Cesarean Section</kwd><kwd> Postoperative Complications</kwd><kwd> Postoperative Hemorrhage</kwd><kwd> Early Discharge</kwd><kwd> Length of Hospital Stay</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Postpartum length of hospital stay has decreased significantly over time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref1">1</xref>]. After vaginal delivery, women may be discharged after a few hours of observation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref2">2</xref>]. Also, the postpartum observation after cesarean section (CS) has been significantly shortened due to the introduction of enhanced recovery after surgery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref3">3</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref8">8</xref>]. Thus, discharge the day after CS has been reported in the literature, and a recent randomized trial from our group found that this could be implemented with preserved parental sense of security [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>CS represents open abdominal surgery, and early discharge requires that major postoperative problems have been suspected and diagnosed before the woman leaves the hospital. Life-threatening complications with urgent need of treatment are a major concern. These include severe abdominal bleeding leading to relaparotomy and uterine atony. Studies indicate that cases with need of relaparotomy due to bleeding are diagnosed and treated within 11 hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref14">14</xref>]. However, these studies did not include other complications with urgent need of intervention, such as medically treated uterine atony.</p><p>Comparison of complications after CS across studies has been compromised by use of various methods to classify postoperative complications. The system introduced by Clavien-Dindo (C-D) is widely implemented in several surgical fields [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref16">16</xref>]. However, it has rarely been used to classify complications after CS. In this study, we used the C-D system to classify complications after planned CS, thereby contributing to a simple and standardized reporting of postoperative complications. Overall, the aim of the study was to assess the time interval from CS to diagnosis of major complications (C-D ≥ II) to determine whether low-risk women (women without preoperative comorbidity or problems during surgery) can be safely discharged from hospital 24 hours after planned CS.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The study population was identified among deliveries registered in the Aarhus Birth Cohort (2001-2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref18">18</xref>] and the Aarhus University Hospital database (2012-2017) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref20">20</xref>]. The study population consisted of women who had experienced a postoperative complication graded as C-D ≥ II (for definition of grades see Table3) after a planned CS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref16">16</xref>]. Planned CS was defined by the procedure KMCA10B planned cesarean section performed prelabor, based on the Nordic coding system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref22">22</xref>]. Furthermore, patients with the unspecific procedure code, KMCA10 cesarean section, were included if CS was scheduled more than 8 hours after a decision to perform surgery had been taken. The diagnoses, surgical procedures, and treatments that could entail postpartum complications are listed in TableS1. We included complications diagnosed within 10 days after CS. Exclusion criteria were multiple pregnancies, preterm birth before week 37 + 0, and stillbirths (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Women with postoperative complications had their medical records scrutinized by at least two authors (AK, AF, NU and/or IS), and women with preoperative comorbidities and/or problems during surgery that indicated need of prolonged stay were excluded. These included preoperative maternal or fetal comorbidity or complications during the surgical procedure (including bleeding ≥ 1000 ml) requiring prolonged postoperative observation (n = 126, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>). Thus, our study population consisted of women in whom no increased risk of postoperative complications was anticipated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Postoperative complications were categorized according to the C-D classification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref16">16</xref>]. C-D I complications were excluded. If a patient had more than one C-D complication, she was classified according to the most severe. The first time a suspected complication was mentioned in the medical record was used to define the time from surgery to complication and categorized as less than 24 hours or as number of days if later than 24 hours after surgery. Furthermore, Danish legislation on data protection implies that patient groups must generally contain at least three cases. Therefore, small patient groups were termed as “less than four”.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref></label><caption><title> Criteria for exclusion from study group</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Pre-operative morbidity</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anticoagulant treatment and cardiac disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="12"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inflammatory bowel disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type 1 diabetes mellitus and insulin-treated gestational diabetes mellitus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Severe thrombocytopenia or hemophilia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-eclampsia or hypertension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal disability or malformation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malignant disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Renal/kidney disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chronic pain problems</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Severe mental disorder, use of benzodiazepine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anemia incl. sickle cell anemia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other conditions or diseases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Per-operative complications</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bleeding ≥ 1000 ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other surgical complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >In total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>This notation is used to avoid potential identification of single cases (see methods).</p><p>Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 15 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA). Normally distributed continuous variables were given as mean values with standard deviations and categorical variables as distributions within the groups.</p><p>The study was approved by The Danish Data Protection Agency in Central Denmark Region (1-16-02-512-15, October 2015) and the Danish Patient Safety Authority (3-3013-1312, December 2015). According to Danish legislation, approval from an Ethics Committee was not required for this type of study.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>During the study period, 5633 women gave birth by planned CS (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref>). Among 791 patients with diagnoses or procedures that could indicate postpartum complications, we identified a study population of 116 women (2% of women undergoing CS) with no preoperative comorbidity or complications during surgery who experienced a complication graded C-D ≥ II within the first 10 days (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref>). Data on gestational age, birth weight, and blood loss were missing in less than 2% of the individuals in both groups (all women undergoing CS and study group). Due to missing data on body mass index (52%) and smoking (27%), these variables were omitted.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref></label><caption><title> Basic characteristics of the study population (Clavien-Dindo ≥ II after planned cesarean section) and the total population (all planned cesarean sections)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study population<sup>a </sup> (N = 116)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total population<sup>b </sup> (N = 5633)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal age years, at birth (SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.5 (4.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.9 (4.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primiparas %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gestational age<sup>c </sup> weeks, at birth (SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.6 (0.94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.5 (0.84)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Previous CS %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blood loss ≥ 1000 ml during CS %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Birth weight<sup> </sup> g (SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3527 (504)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3497 (510)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Small for gestational age<sup>c</sup> (z-score &lt; −2.0) %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fetal macrosomia (≥4500 g) %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Placenta previa %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fetal malpresentation<sup>d </sup> %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>Missing values: birth weight n = 2. <sup>b</sup>Missing values: blood loss n = 1; birth weight n = 17. <sup>c</sup>Calculations based on completed weeks of gestation. <sup>d</sup>Transverse, oblique and breech presentation included. SD: standard deviation.</p><p>Forty-seven of the 116 women (41%) had a C-D II complication (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref>). Of these, 22 women had atonic postpartum bleeding treated with uterotonics but without further intervention. This complication was suspected within 24 hours in all 22. Less than four women without per- or postoperative bleeding had anemia requiring blood transfusion within 1 to 4 days without other complications. The amount of blood transfused in this group ranged from two to three units. Eight women had endometritis diagnosed 1 to 9 days after CS and were treated with antibiotics. Less than four women had wound hematoma/infection without need of surgical intervention. Additional complications included mastitis (n = 4), post lumbar puncture headache (n &lt; 4), pneumonia (n &lt; 4), postpartum hypertension (n &lt; 4), and fever of unknown origin (n &lt; 4).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref></label><caption><title> Number of postoperative complications after planned cesarean section, presented by time of suspicion within vs. after 24 hours among 116 women. Complications within 10 days are included</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >≤24 h</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;24 h</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Clavien-Dindo grade II complications (n = 47) Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than such allowed for grade I complications.<sup>**</sup> Blood transfusions are included</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Atonic postpartum bleeding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pneumonia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Endometritis not requiring surgical intervention</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Postpartum anemia requiring blood transfusion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mastitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wound hematoma/infection not requiring surgical intervention</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fever of unknown origin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Postlumbar puncture headache</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Postpartum hypertension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications<sup>*</sup> (n = 69) III: Requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention IV: Life-threatening complication requiring ICU management and organ dysfunction</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Atonic postpartum bleeding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wound hematoma/infection without need of immediate surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bleeding from abdominal wound requiring immediate surgical intervention</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bleeding from uterine incision requiring immediate surgical intervention</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unrecognized bladder lesion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wound dehiscence/burst abdomen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Endometritis with retained blood clots/placental membranes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >In total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>This notation is used to avoid potential identification of single cases (see methods). <sup>**</sup>Allowed therapeutic regimens grade I: drugs as antiemetics, antipyretics, analgesics, diuretics, electrolytes and physiotherapy.</p><p>Sixty-nine of the 116 women (59%) had a C-D III-IV complication (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref>). Thirty-seven had postpartum bleeding due to atony or bleeding from the abdominal or uterine incisions, with need for immediate surgical intervention. This complication was suspected within the first 24 hours in 29 of the 37 women. Less than four women were transferred to the intensive care unit (C-D IV). All had relaparotomy performed within the first 24 hours. Eight patients experienced significant vaginal bleeding 2 to 9 days postpartum and underwent evacuation of retained blood clots/placental membranes. Five of these patients had been discharged and then readmitted. Among the 69 women with C-D III-IV complications, 19 had wound hematomas/infection, where surgical intervention was performed on the following day. These complications were suspected within 1 to 10 days. Less than four women developed acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie’s syndrome) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref23">23</xref>], all diagnosed within 2 days. Four women experienced wound dehiscence, which was diagnosed within 1 to 6 days after CS. Furthermore, five women had endometritis with retained blood clots/placental membranes.</p><p>A relaparotomy was performed in 12 of the 116 women (10%), in most cases due to atonic bleeding or bleeding from surgical incisions. Procedures performed in less than four cases included B-Lynch suture, postpartum hysterectomy, or repair of bladder lesions. All 12 women undergoing relaparotomy had clinical signs of major complications within the first 24 hours postoperatively. Twenty-five of the 116 women (22%) received a blood transfusion, 22 (88%) of whom had had another complication besides anemia diagnosed before transfusion.</p><p>In total, 63 of the 116 women (54%) with C-D complications ≥ II had their diagnoses suspected within 24 hours after CS (C-D II: 25, C-D III-V: 38, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref>). These included all cases of relaparotomy and uterine atony with immediate need of medical treatment. Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction was diagnosed within 2 days, while other complications were suspected and treated 2 to 10 days postoperatively (FigureS1).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Our study showed that in a university clinic performing 5633 planned CS during a period of almost 17 years, 116 patients (2% of all women undergoing CS) without preoperative comorbidity or problems during surgery experienced an early postoperative complication C-D II-IV within 10 days. All complications requiring relaparotomy or uterine atony treated medically were suspected within 24 hours after surgery.</p><p>Strengths of the study include the large size of the study group. Our data were derived from the Aarhus Birth Cohort and the Aarhus University Hospital database. The Aarhus Birth Cohort comprises more than 96% of all eligible patients registered in the Danish National Patient Database, where codes are considered of high quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref24">24</xref>]. Moreover, we used the C-D classification to categorize postoperative complication. The strength of this approach is its simplicity and categorization according to need for therapeutic intervention. Thorough review of the medical records was performed during this process.</p><p>Limitations of our study include the retrospective design, with potential selection bias because risk factors were identified by authors aware of the outcome. The time from the CS procedure to suspected early postoperative complications was defined as less than 24 hours, but our data did not allow for a more precise assessment. Only complications diagnosed within the first 10 days were included because our aim was to study the time interval from CS to complications in a setting in which low-risk women could have been discharged. Patients readmitted to other departments may have been missed because access to the medical records was restricted for legal reasons to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Aarhus University Hospital. Problems handled solely by the general practitioner were not registered, but these complications were assumed to be of minor relevance since readmission was not needed. Another limitation is that our study concerned only maternal complications; thus, studies on neonatal risks associated with early discharge are needed. The risk of neonatal readmission due to jaundice is of concern, but factors such as readmission thresholds and confounding by indication should be kept in mind when evaluating readmission in relation to a reduced length of hospital stay [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref26">26</xref>].</p><p>Efficient primary health care is needed when early discharge after CS is considered, even in low-risk patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref27">27</xref>]. Our results were obtained in patients in the Danish public health care system, which may impair the external validity. Standardized postpartum care in Denmark includes early contacts and visits from a primary health care nurse within the first week and easy access to health care after discharge. In our study, secondary postpartum bleeding (&gt;24 hours) occurred during the rest of the pre-defined 10-day postpartum study period. Other studies found that CS is not a risk factor for secondary postpartum bleeding in comparison with vaginal delivery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref29">29</xref>]. Thus, the risk of secondary postpartum bleeding does not constitute an indication for prolonged hospital stay after CS. Similar considerations apply for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction as these patients typically presented with abdominal distension and pain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref23">23</xref>] that ensure timely contact to health care providers. Furthermore, the Danish primary health care system ensures that patients with infections/hematomas are promptly readmitted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117304-ref30">30</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>We observed that postoperative bleeding with need of relaparotomy (C-D III and IV) and medically treated atonic bleeding (C-D II) were diagnosed and treated within the first 24 hours after surgery in low-risk patients undergoing planned CS at term. According to these data, discharge the day after surgery seems safe in low-risk patients provided that efficient primary health care is available.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to thank professor Tine Brink Henriksen, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital for practical and epidemiological support and advice regarding the Aarhus Birth Cohort.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Funding Details</title><p>This work was supported by the Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundation under Grant 18-10-0434; and King Christian the 10th Foundation under Grant 64/2018.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Kruse, A.R., Arendt, L.H., Erikstrup, C., Kesmodel, U.S., Lauszus, F.F., Uldbjerg, N., Sundtoft, I. and Forman, A. (2022) Time Course of Postoperative Complications in Low-Risk Women after Planned Cesarean Section. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12, 394-407. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2022.125036</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Supplementary Material</title><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S1</label><caption><title> Diagnoses, surgical procedures, and treatments indicating potential postpartum complications based on the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) and the Nordic coding system</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Diagnoses</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G970</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Cerebrospinal fluid leak from spinal puncture</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K519</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Ulcerative colitis, unspecified</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K560</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Paralytic ileus</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K566</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Other and unspecified intestinal obstruction</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N719</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Inflammatory disease of uterus, unspecified</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O100</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pre-existing essential hypertension complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O266</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Liver disorders in pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O679</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Intrapartum hemorrhage, unspecified</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O720</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Third-stage hemorrhage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O721</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Other immediate postpartum hemorrhage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O722</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Delayed and secondary postpartum hemorrhage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O723</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Postpartum coagulation defects</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O731</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Retained portions of placenta and membranes, without hemorrhage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O85</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Puerperal sepsis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O860</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Other puerperal infections</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O860</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Infection of obstetric surgical wound</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O864</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pyrexia of unknown origin following delivery</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O868</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Other specified puerperal infections</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O894</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Spinal and epidural anesthesia-induced headache during the puerperium</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O900</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Disruption of cesarean section wound</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O902</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Hematoma of obstetric wound</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O908</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Other complications of the puerperium, not elsewhere classified</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O909</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Complication of the puerperium, unspecified</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O912</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Nonpurulent mastitis associated with childbirth</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O925</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Suppressed lactation</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O927</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Other and unspecified disorders of lactation</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O984</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Viral hepatitis complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O990</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Anemia complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O992</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O995</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Diseases of the respiratory system complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O996</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Diseases of the digestive system complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O998</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Other specified diseases and conditions complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R101</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pain localized to upper abdomen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R102</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pelvic and perineal pain</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R520</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Acute pain</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T810</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Hemorrhage and hematoma complicating a procedure, not elsewhere classified</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T814</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Infection following a procedure, not elsewhere classified</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T819</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Unspecified complication of procedure</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T889</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Complication of surgical and medical care, unspecified</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Surgical procedures</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KCH00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Suture of bladder</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LCD00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Hysterectomy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LWC00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Reoperation for deep infiltration in gynecological surgery</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LWD00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Reoperation for superficial hemorrhage in gynecological surgery</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LWE00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Reoperation for deep hemorrhage in gynecological surgery</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MBA00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Vacuum aspiration from uterus after delivery or abortion</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MBA03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Curettage of uterus after delivery or abortion</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MBA10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Manual exploration of delivered uterus</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MBA96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other removal of retained products of conception after delivery or abortion</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MBB10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Packing of delivered uterus</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MBB96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other manual procedure on delivered uterus</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MBW96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other operation after delivery or abortion</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MWA00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Repair of wound dehiscence in obstetric surgery</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MWB00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reoperation for superficial infection in obstetric surgery</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MWD00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reoperation for superficial hemorrhage in obstetric surgery</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MWE00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reoperation for deep hemorrhage in obstetric surgery</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MWF00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reoperation for insufficiency of anastomosis or suture in obstetric surgery</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MWW96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other reoperation in obstetric surgery</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >TAB30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epidural blood patch</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >UJF32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coloscopy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >UJF42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flexible sigmoidoscopy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >UKC02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cystoscopy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >ULC02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hysteroscopy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Classification of treatment and care</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >BIAD7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment with rectal tube/catheter</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >BIAZ00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Insertion of nasogastric tube</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >BIAZ07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Insertion of rectal tube/catheter</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.117304-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fink, A.M. (2011) Early Hospital Discharge in Maternal and Newborn Care. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 40, 149-156.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01225.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nilsson, I.M., Kronborg, H., Knight, C.H. and Strandberg-Larsen, K. (2017) Early Discharge Following Birth—What Characterises Mothers and Newborns? Sexual &amp; Reproductive Healthcare: Official Journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives, 11, 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2016.10.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kehlet, H. and Wilmore, D.W. (2008) Evidence-Based Surgical Care and the Evolution of Fast-Track Surgery. Annals of Surgery, 248, 189-198.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Corso, E., Hind, D., Beever, D., Fuller, G., Wilson, M.J., et al. (2017) Enhanced Recovery after Elective Caesarean: A Rapid Review of Clinical Protocols, and an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 17, Article No. 91.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1265-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fay, E.E., Hitti, J.E., Delgado, C.M., Savitsky, L.M., Mills, E.B., et al. (2019) An Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway for Cesarean Delivery Decreases Hospital Stay and Cost. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 221, 349.e1-349.e9.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.217</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Metcalfe, A., Mathai, M., Liu, S., Leon, J.A. and Joseph, K.S. (2016) Proportion of Neonatal Readmission Attributed to Length of Stay for Childbirth: A Population-Based Cohort Study. BMJ Open, 6, e012007.  
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pertile, R., Pavanello, L., Soffiati, M., Manica, L. and Piffer, S. (2018) Length of Stay for Childbirth in Trentino (North-East of Italy): The Impact of Maternal Characteristics and Organizational Features of the Maternity Unit on the Probability of Early Discharge of Healthy, Term Infants. European Journal of Pediatrics, 177, 155-159.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-3035-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kruse, A.R., Arendt, L.H., Jakobsen, D.H., Kehlet, H., Lauszus, F.F., et al. (2021) Length of Hospital Stay after Cesarean Section in Denmark from 2004 to 2016: A National Register-Based Study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 100, 244-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tan, P.C., Norazilah, M.J. and Omar, S.Z. (2012) Hospital Discharge on the First Compared with the Second Day after a Planned Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 120, 1273-1282.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723a95</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bowden, S.J., Dooley, W., Hanrahan, J., Kanu, C., Halder, S., et al. (2019) Fast-Track Pathway for Elective Caesarean Section: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Promote Day 1 Discharge. BMJ Open Quality, 8, e000465.  
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000465</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wrench, I.J., Allison, A., Galimberti, A., Radley, S. and Wilson, M.J. (2015) Introduction of Enhanced Recovery for Elective Caesarean Section Enabling Next Day Discharge: A Tertiary Centre Experience. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 24, 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.01.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kruse, A.R., Lauszus, F.F., Forman, A., Kesmodel, U.S., Rugaard, M.B., et al. (2021) Effect of Early Discharge after Planned Cesarean Section on Recovery and Parental Sense of Security. A Randomized Clinical Trial. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 100, 955-963. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lurie, S., Sadan, O. and Golan, A. (2007) Re-Laparotomy after Cesarean Section. European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 134, 184-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.10.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gedikbasi, A., Akyol, A., Asar, E., Bingol, B., Uncu, R., et al. (2008) Re-laparotomy after Cesarean Section: Operative Complications in Surgical Delivery. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 278, 419-425.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-008-0604-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dindo, D., Demartines, N. and Clavien, P.A. (2004) Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal with Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey. Annals of Surgery, 240, 205-213.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clavien, P.A., Barkun, J., de Oliveira, M.L., Vauthey, J.N., Dindo, D., et al. (2009) The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications: Five-Year Experience. Annals of Surgery, 250, 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Larsen, P.S., Kamper-Jorgensen, M., Adamson, A., Barros, H., Bonde, J.P., et al. (2013) Pregnancy and Birth Cohort Resources in Europe: A Large Opportunity for Aetiological Child Health Research. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 27, 393-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mortensen, L.M., Bech, B.H., Nohr, E.A., Kruhoffer, M., Kjaergaard, S., et al. (2013) Data Resource Profile: The Aarhus Birth Cohort Biobank (ABC Biobank). International Journal of Epidemiology, 42, 1697-1701. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt199</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lynge, E., Sandegaard, J.L. and Rebolj, M. (2011) The Danish National Patient Register. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39, 30-33.  
https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811401482</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Langhoff-Roos, J. and Rasmussen, S. (2003) The Danish Health Authority: Validation of the Danish National Patient Register in Relation to Research in Obstetrics and Quality Assessment [Validering af Landspatientregistret (LPR) mhp. obstetrisk forskning og kvalitetssikring]. Contract No.: Report.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">The Danish Health Data Authority. The Danish Health Care Classification System. [Sundhedsdatastyrelsen, SKS-browser, vers. 4.03]. (In Danish)  
http://www.medinfo.dk/sks/brows.php</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NOMESCO Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee (2010) NOMESCO Classification of Surgical Procedures.  
https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:970547/FULLTEXT01.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jayaram, P., Mohan, M., Lindow, S. and Konje, J. (2017) Postpartum Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (Ogilvie’s Syndrome): A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series. European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 214, 145-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">The Danish Health Data Authority. The Medical Birth Register, 2019. [Sundhedsdatastyrelsen, Det Medicinske F&amp;oslash;dselsregister] 2019.  
http://www.esundhed.dk/sundhedsregistre/MFR/Sider/MFR06A.aspx</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bayoumi, Y.A., Bassiouny, Y.A., Hassan, A.A., Gouda, H.M., Zaki, S.S., et al. (2016) Is There a Difference in the Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes between Patients Discharged after 24 h versus 72 h Following Cesarean Section? A Prospective Randomized Observational Study on 2998 Patients. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal &amp; Neonatal Medicine: The Official Journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 29, 1339-1343.  
https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1048678</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harron, K., Gilbert, R., Cromwell, D., Oddie, S. and van der Meulen, J. (2017) Newborn Length of Stay and Risk of Readmission. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 31, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12359</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (2011) Caesarean Section. NICE Clinical Guideline.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoveyda, F. and MacKenzie, I.Z. (2001) Secondary Postpartum Haemorrhage: Incidence, Morbidity and Current Management. BJOG, 108, 927-930.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00230.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Debost-Legrand, A., Riviere, O., Dossou, M. and Vendittelli, F. (2015) Risk Factors for Severe Secondary Postpartum Hemorrhages: A Historical Cohort Study. Birth, 42, 235-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12175</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117304-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leth, R.A., Moller, J.K., Thomsen, R.W., Uldbjerg, N. and Norgaard, M. (2009) Risk of Selected Postpartum Infections after Cesarean Section Compared with Vaginal Birth: A Five-Year Cohort Study of 32,468 Women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 88, 976-983. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340903147405</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>