<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JACEN</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2325-7458</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jacen.2022.112009</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JACEN-117294</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Ethnobotanical Investigation of Insecticidal Plants and Evaluation of the Insecticidal Activity of &lt;i&gt;Capsicum chinense&lt;/i&gt; on &lt;i&gt;Sitophilus zeama&amp;iuml;s&lt;/i&gt; of Maize and &lt;i&gt;Aphis craccivora&lt;/i&gt; of Groundnuts: Case of Boffa, Bok&#233; Region (Republic of Guinea)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aboubacar</surname><given-names>Diallo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adama</surname><given-names>Moussa Sakho</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Namory</surname><given-names>Keita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lansana</surname><given-names>Abou Bangoura</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amadou</surname><given-names>Youssouf Bah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdoulaye</surname><given-names>Keita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Chemistry, Gamal Abdel Nasser University, Conakry, Republic of Guinea</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Biology, Kindia University, Kindia, Republic of Guinea</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Laboratory Techniques, Mamou Superior Institute of Technology, Mamou, Republic of Guinea</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>04</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>132</fpage><lpage>142</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The present study, which aims to contribute to the valorization of 
  <em>Capsicum chinense</em>, focuses on ethnobotanical investigations and evaluation of insecticidal activity on 
  <em>Sitophilus zeama&amp;iuml;s</em> and 
  <em>Aphis craccivora</em>, as well as the germination power of infected maize and peanut grains treated and not treated with 
  <em>Capsicum chinense</em> leaf powder. To do this, the moisture content of corn and peanuts was determined by the techniques: drying in the sun and in the oven. The insecticidal effect of the powder was tested on maize and peanut kernels infected by the AGRAR (2013) method, followed by a test of the germination potency of these treated grains. The average moisture values of corn and groundnut kernels are 14.51% and 12.25% respectively. The results show, a higher insecticidal efficacy of 
  <em>Capsicum chinense </em>leaf powder on 
  <em>Sitophilus zeama&amp;iuml;s </em>and 
  <em>Aphis craccivora </em>with doses (2, 4 and 8 g). The average germination rates of maize and peanut kernels infected and treated with this powder are: (16.5%; 63%; 99.5%) and (21.25%; 96.5%; 99.75%), respectively. This study could be a bio-insecticide alternative for the peasant community in the conservation of cereal and legume products.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Corn</kwd><kwd> Groundnut</kwd><kwd> Ethnobotany And Insecticidal Activity of &lt;i&gt;Capsicum chinense&lt;/i&gt;</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The insects encountered in foodstuffs stored in warehouses, in this case maize and groundnuts, are many and varied. They can cause significant losses on the quality and quantity of products stored in the range of 5% to 10% in temperate regions and 20% to 30% in tropical regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref2">2</xref>]. Maize and groundnuts are among the most important cereal crops in the world followed by the others (wheat and rice). In the Republic of Guinea, 30% of production is destroyed between harvest and consumption caused by insect pests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref3">3</xref>]. In December 1988 in the prefecture of Pita, a vast research program on a majority of insect pests was initiated by the Guinean government to be able to reduce their damage. This program found that, the most destructive insects of these cereals were: Sitophilus zeama&#239;s and Aphis craccivora of the peanut [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref4">4</xref>]. Many aromatic plants such as Lamiaceaes, Solanaceaes have been used in traditional medecine, and instead of chemical insecticides for reasons of health poisoning of users caused by insecticides of chemical origin, or lack of means for populations to buy chemical insecticides as well as environmental pollution by these chemical insecticides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref10">10</xref>]. Indeed, we recently published the insecticidal effect of two plants that are Hyptis suaveolens and Hyptis spicigera on corn kernels infected with Sitophilus zeama&#239;s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref3">3</xref>]. As an extension of our studies, we report in this work, an ethnobotanical survey of some plants with insecticidal virtues was used by the farmers of Boffa and determined the insecticidal activity of Capsicum chinense on Sitophilus zeama&#239;s of corn and Aphis craccivora of peanuts followed by the determination of the germination rates of corn and peanut grains infected with Sitophilus zeama&#239;s and Aphis craccivora and treated with Capsicum chinense powder.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Presentation of the Study Area</title><p>Boffa Prefecture is an administrative subdivision of the Republic of Guinea. Located in the west of the country on the Atlantic coast, in the natural region of Maritime Guinea, this prefecture is part of the administrative region of Bok&#233; with an area of 910,000 ha = 9100 km<sup>2</sup> (10˚11'03&quot; north, 14˚02'38&quot; west). Distant 150 kilometers from the Guinean capital, Conakry, Boffa has nearly 227,217 inhabitants and a density of 25 inhab./km<sup>2</sup> in 2016. Its capital is the city of Boffa. The prefecture is divided into eight sub-prefectures: Boffa-Centre; Kolia; Douprou; Koba; Lisso; Mankountan; Tamita; Tugnifili.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Framework of Studies</title><p>The Laboratory of Organic Chemistry of the Gamal Abdel Nasser University of Conakry, the laboratory of the National Office of Quality Control of Matoto Conakry, served as a framework for studies.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Ethnobotanical Investigations</title><p>Ethnobotanical surveys were carried out using a series of questionnaires pre-developed on a survey sheet designed for this purpose. This investigation was conducted in some localities of the prefecture of Boffa for 4 months. The collection of information covered respondents, pests and insecticidal and medicinal plants in selected Districts of Kolia and Tugnifili (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). On the survey sheet used was distributed farmers, herbalists, breeders, option leaders according to Districts, method of acquisition, age group, by socio-professional category, modes of use of the parts used, citation frequencies, scientific and vernacular names, the list of plants (Tables 1-5). Among the most cited plants, Capsicum chinense was the most cited; it is for this reason that we have specifically chosen this plant in this study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Collection of Capsicum chinense Fruit</title><p>The fruits of Capsicum chinense have been the cause of its frequency of citations. The fruits of Capsicum chinense were collected in Boffa and surrounding areas in January 2019. They were subjected to drying in the shade and in the open air for 30 days. Then they were pounded and sieved. The powders thus obtained were used as raw materials for the evaluation of their insecticidal activity.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Collection of Uninfected Corn Kernels and Peanuts</title><p>The corn and groundnut kernels) that were used for this test were purchased at the yenguema market in (Boffa) prefecture. These purchased grains were sorted to remove bad grains, foreign matter, and then washed and dried at room temperature in the laboratory for 72 hours. Then, a second drying at 40˚C in the oven for 15 minutes removed residual contaminants.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Breeding of Sitophilus zeama&#239;s and Aphis craccivora (Maize and Groundnuts)</title><p>The maize and groundnut kernels infected with Sitophilus zeama&#239;s and Aphis craccivora were purchased at the yenguema market (Boffa), and their farms continued under the ambient conditions of the Matoto natural and industrial products quality control laboratory (temperature 20˚C &#177; 40˚C) and humidity in the vicinity (81% &#177; 5%).</p><p>Procedure: Weigh 6 kg of corn kernels (or peanuts) already infested with Sitophilus zeama&#239;s or Aphis craccivora of peanuts and placed in glass jars then cover with a porous fabric for better aeration and prevent insects from escaping. Keep these jars at room temperature in the laboratory for 30 days away from foreign infestations. Then, sift to eliminate the adult Sitophilus zeama&#239;s and Aphis craccivora and continue rearing with the grains infested by the eggs for 29 days to obtain new insects.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Experimental Methods</title><p>A total of 42 jars were used for this experiment; they were arranged in 02 batches of 21 and each bio-insecticide was repeated three times. Of these 02 lots, 01 was intended to study the insecticidal effect of Capsicum chinense powders, 01 others to assess the damage caused by Sitophilus zeama&#239;s (or Aphis craccivora) for 120 hours. The jars were kept in a well-ventilated room under laboratory conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Infestation of Maize and Groundnut Kernels (AGRAR-2013 Method)</title><p>Procedure: According to the Food Africa Programme-African Research on agriculture, food, and nutrition method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref11">11</xref>], 100 g of non-infested maize (or peanut) grains were weighed and then introduced into the jars previously marked as: T0 (control), Fch1, Fch2, Fch3 (the powder of the fruits of Capsicum chinense). Then weigh 2 g, 4 g, 8 g of powder, add to 100 g of homogenized corn or peanut in the jars. Control jars (T0) did not receive treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref5">5</xref>]. Then introduce into each jar 20 adult insects and cover with a porous cloth for better aeration; sealed with elastic fronds to prevent external contamination.</p></sec><sec id="s2_9"><title>2.9. Determination of Moisture Content of Uninfected Maize and Groundnuts</title><p>Procedure: The moisture levels of the corn and groundnut kernels were determined by the method of complete desiccation in the oven between 100˚C - 105˚C for 3 hours according to the (formula) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>H % = P 2 − P 1 P e &#215; 100 (1)</p><p>wherein “H%” represents Percentage of humidity; P<sub>1</sub>; P<sub>2</sub> = Weight of capsule and sample before and after drying; Pe = Weight of the test portion.</p></sec><sec id="s2_10"><title>2.10. Calculation of the Powder Toxicity of Capsicum chinense Fruits</title><p>The percentage of mortality was determined using W.S. Abbott’s formula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref13">13</xref>] after 5 days of observation of the contents of the jars taking into account the natural mortalities observed in the control jars according to (the formula):</p><p>M c = M o − M t 100 − M t &#215; 100 (2)</p><p>Mc = Adjusted mortality; Mo = Mortality in treated boxes and Mt = Mortality in control boxes.</p></sec><sec id="s2_11"><title>2.11. Germination Rate Test</title><p>The germination test was performed at the beginning of the experiment on infested grains that were in constant contact with capsicum chinense fruit powders for 6 days [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref16">16</xref>]. The grains were spread in jars containing soil moistened with water at 26˚C and sealed at laboratory temperature. The germination rate was evaluated by counting sprouted grains versus seeded grains according to (the formula).</p><p>G % = N G G N G E &#215; 100 (3)</p><p>G% = Percentage of germination; NGG = Number of sprouted grains; NGE = Number of seeded grains.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Results of Ethnobotanical Surveys</title><p>Our ethnobotanical surveys in the (02) sub-prefectures allowed us to identify 71 people, including 20 women and 51 men (or 71.83%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Indeed, of the 71 respondents who use insecticides of plant origin and their methods of acquisition, 39 (54.93%) acquired on the basis of parental transmission (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). It is also noted that the age of respondents varies from 30 to 70 years (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The age groups that practice effectively are around 41 - 50 years (39.44%) and 51 - 60 years (29.58%). On the other hand, the other age groups are less represented: 30 - 41 (18.31%) and 61 - 70 (12.67%). The results also show that only 18.31% of respondents were in school compared to 35.25% of farmers; 19.72% marabouts and sage; 15.49% merchants and 8% of traditional hunters (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>In this ethnobotanical survey, eight (8) native plants with insecticidal effects were identified and grouped into eight families which are: Solanacea (98%), Liliacea (10%), Zingiberaceae (10%), Combretaceae (15%), Labiae (15%), Myrtaceae (16%), Chrysobalanaceae (20%), Lamiaceae (20%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). The results of the ethnobotanical survey showed that the plant species most used as an insecticide</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution by districts by origin and sex in the Sub-Prefecture of Tugnifili and Kolia</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Locality (districts)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sex</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Totals</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kakilet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yoyah</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tagb&#233;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dabayah</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kolon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yampony</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dansa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bigory</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mokeifoton</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Totals</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution by mode of knowledge acquisition</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mode of knowledge acquisition</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parental</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Work experience</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >apprenticeship</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Totals</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution by age group and sex</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Age range</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sex</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Totals</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 - 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >61 - 70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Totals</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution by socio-professional categories</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Farmer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marabou, wise</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seller</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agronomist, herbalist</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >hunter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Totals</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> List of plants cited and their frequency of citation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Scientific names</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Families</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Vernacular names</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parts used</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Citation frequency</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nightshade</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gbengb&#232;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Allium cepa L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liliacea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y&#232;bh&#232;gbeli (S)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bulb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zingiber officinale Rosc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zingiberaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nyokhomikunkuri</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bulb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Combretum micranthum G., Don</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Combretaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kankaliba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ocimum basilicum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Labiae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Khomio (S)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Psidium guajava L.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Myrtaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Goyab&#232; (P)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parinarima crophylla sabine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chrysobalanaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bansouma (S)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bark</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hyptis suaveolens (L.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lamiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yoguehirignahi (S)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>during the conservation of corn and groundnut grains is: Solanacea (98%), it is followed by the other species. The parts of the plants regularly used are: fruits, bulb, leaves and bark. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> shows the average values of the moisture content of maize and groundnut grains which are respectively: 14.51% and 12.25%. These values are at the limit of appreciation of the moisture content of drugs, which is 14% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref13">13</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Moisture Content of Maize and Groundnuts</title><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Moisture in corn and groundnut grain</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Designation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>g</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>e</sub>g</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>1</sub>g</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>M</sub>%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Corn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >14.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Peanuts</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >12.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Insecticidal Effect of Capsicum chinense Powders</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> shows the different doses used of Capsicum chinense powders on Sitophilus zeama&#239;s and Aphis craccivora as well as the standard deviations for assessing their insecticidal effects, and the photo of the experimental device of jars containing maize and groundnut grains. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>)</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Insecticidal effect (or toxicity) of Capsicum chinense powder</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Doses (g/100g corn)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average mortality rate (%) (standard deviation)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 (0.81)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80 (0.81)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 (0.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80 (0.81)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85 (0.81)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Impact of Capsicum Chinense Powder on Germination</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref> shows the different doses of Capsicum chinense powder used in the treatment of corn and peanut kernels infected with Aphis Craccivora and Sitophilus zeama&#239;s and the different germination rates, followed by the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> showing the stage of three (3) leaves after germination of corn and peanut grains treated with Capsicum chinense powder in the laboratory.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>For this study, 71 persons were identified 20 women and 51 men <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. This indicates a predominance of humans in agriculture and the use of plants in the preservation of harvest products. This is in contradiction with studies carried out in Republic of Mali by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref17">17</xref>] which gave (71.83%) women who handle medicinal plants of all these forms.</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Impact of Capsicum chinense powder on germination</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Doses (g/100g corn)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Germination percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average rates (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average rates (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Indeed, of the 71 respondents who use insecticides of plant origin and their methods of acquisition, 39 (54.93%) acquired on the basis of parental transmission <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>The average moisture content values of corn and groundnut kernels are: 14.51% and 12.25% respectively which is the drug appreciation limit of 14% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref13">13</xref>] which are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>.</p><p>The different results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>, show an effectiveness of Capsicum chinense powder on Aphis Craccivora and Sitophilus zeama&#239;s at the different doses used; a mortality rate of 80 &#177; 0.81; 85 &#177; 0.8. However, the results obtained for maize show a slight difference of (P &lt; 0.05) compared to the results found for groundnuts. For the control, no mortality was recorded because he had not received treatment with Capsicum chinense powder. This indicates that the insecticidal activity of many plants is related to the presence of the essential oils they contain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p>Objective to germinate corn and peanut grains treated with Capsicum chinense powder, (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) under laboratory conditions was, to evaluate the possibility of germination of these infected grains and treated with Capsicum chinense powder. During this period, we actually observed their germinations, and the different germination rates varied according to the doses administered. The average germination rates are: 53.33% for infected maize grains treated with Capsicum chinense powder and 72.50% for infected peanut grains and processed Capsicum chinense powder. The grains in the control jars (T0) <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> gave identical rates of 1.75%. According to some scientific publication on the germination power of grains show that the decrease in the germination power of seeds can probably be related to many parameters that are in one way or another their heterogeneities, color, weight, size as well as their chemical compositions, ligth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.117294-ref20">20</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>This ethnobotanical survey in two sub-prefectures of Boffa identified 71 people, including 20 women and 51 men who grow maize and groundnuts. The age range is: 41 to 61 years. The majority use the parts of the plants to preserve their harvest grains. Eight (8) plants with insecticidal properties frequently mentioned are: Solanacea, Liliacea, Zingiberaceae, Combretaceae, Labiae, Myrtaceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Lamiaceae. And the one most cited as an insecticide in the conservation of corn and groundnut grains is: Solanacea (Capsicum chinense). The insecticide efficacy test of Solanacea powder (Capsicum chinense) was performed on corn and peanut kernels infected with Aphis craccivora and Sitophilus zeama&#239;s. The average germination rates of these infected maize and peanut grains treated with Capsicum chinense powder are: 53.33%; 72.50% respectively. Untreated corn and peanut kernels significantly lost their germination powers with a rate of 1.75%. The moisture content of corn kernels and groundnuts gave: 14.51%, 12.25% respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>We the authors, declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.117294-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassan, K., Nasser, A.A., Sabiha, S., Nesa, N., Khan, M. and Islam, N. (2018) Control Potentials et Hyptis sauveolens L. (Pait) Extracts against Artamia salima L. Nauplil and Tribalium castaneum (HBST) Adults. Journal of Entamology and Zoology Studies, 6, 785-789.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bounechada, M.M. and Arab, R. (2011) Effet insecticide des plantes Melia azedarach L. et Peganumharmala L. sur Triboliumcastaneum Herbst. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Agronomie, 1, 1-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sakho, A. M., Diallo, A., Traoré, K., Condé, F., Keita, A. et Kourouma, M. (2021) Evaluation de l’activité insecticide des feuilles Hyptis suaveolens et de Hyptis spicigera sur le taux de germination des grains de mais infectés par Sitophilus zeamais. Afrique Science, 18, 31-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Camara, S. (2017) Institut de rechercheagronomique de Guinée, Kindia, République de GuinéeProduction et utilisation du maisen Guinée. https://www.fao.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gueye, M.T., Cissoko, P.S., George, G., Wathel, J.P. and Lognay, G. (2012) Efficacy of Powdere Maize Cobs against the Maize Weevil Sittophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Stored Maize in Senegal. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 32, 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758412000148</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yolide, I., Keita, D.A., Moussa, I., Toumane, A., Bakasso, S., Saley, K., Much, T., Pirat, J. and Ouamba, J.M. (2020) Enquête ethnobotanique sur les plantes utilisées traditionnellement au Niger dans la lute contre les moustiques vecteurs des maladies parasitaires. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 14, 570-579. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i2.21</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngamo, T.S.L., Ngatanko, I., Ngassoum, M.B., Mapongmestsem, P.M. and Hance, T. (2007) Insecticidal Efficiency of Essential Oils of 5 Aromatic Plants Tested Both alone and in Combination towards Sitophilusoryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Research Journal of Biological Science, 2, 75-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bossou, A.D., Ahoussi, E., Ruysbergh, E., Adams, A., Smagghe, G.N.D., Kimpe, Avlessi, F., Sohounhlou, D.C.K. and Mangelinckx, S. (2015) Characterization of Volatile Compounds from Three Cymbopogon Species and Eucalyptus citriodora from Benin and Their Insecticidal Activities against Tribolium costaneum. Industrial Crops and Products, 76, 306-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.06.031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Athanassiou, C.D., Kavallieratos, N.G. and Meletitsis, C.M. (2007) Insecticidal Effect of Three Diatomaceous Earth Formulations, Applied alone or in Combination, against Stored-Product Beetle Species on Wheat and Maize. Journal of Stored Products Research, 43, 330-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2006.08.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pierre, V.K.S., Beaudelaire, K.P., Borice, T., Tsafack., Jonas, K., Roland, T.T., Rémy, B.T., Jean, P.D., Till, O. and Léon, A.T. (2021) Ethnobotany, Pharmacology and Phytochemical Investigations of the Seeds of Pentaclethra macrophylla Benth (Mimosaceae). Advances in Biological Chemistry, 11, 126-141. https://doi.org/10.4236/abc.2021.113009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fok, M., Ndoy, O., Koné, S. and AGRAR (2013) Proceedings of AGRAR 1st Conference of African Research on Agriculture, Food and Nutrition. Yamoussoukro, June 4-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Détermination de la teneur en humidité dans les aliments pour animaux et les pains. Agence Fédérale pour la Sécurité de la Chaine alimentaire, Laboratoire de Liège (2013, Février).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deffen, K.P., Akanvou, L., Nemlin, G.J. and Kouame, P.L. (2015) Evaluation morphologique et nutritionnelle de variétés locales et améliorées de mais (Zea mays I.) produites en Cote d’Ivoire. Afrique Science, 133, 181-196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aminata, K.A., Gueye, M.T., Diop, S.M., Cissokho, P.S. and Gueye, A.N. (2018) Etude de l’efficacité de la poudre et des cendres de balle de riz contre deux insectes ravageurs du riz stocké au Sénégal, Sitophilus zeamais (Matsch) et Tribalium castanneum (Harbst). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 12, 1731-1739. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v12i4.17</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Conti, B., Benelli, G., Flamini, P.L., Cioni, R., Profeti, L., Cedcarini, M., Macchia, A. and Canale, A. (2012) Larvicidal Repellent Activity of Hyptis suaveolens (Lamiaceae) Essential Oil against the Mosquito Aedes albopictus Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitology Research, 110, 2013-2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2730-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ri, A.A., Irie, B., Kouame, P.L. and Zoro, B.I.A. (2011) Base génétiques et biochimiques de la capacité germinative des graines: Implications pour les systèmes semences et la production alimentaire. Sciences &amp; Nature, 8, 119-137.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Denou, A., Koudouvo, K., Togola, A., Haidara, M., Dembele, S.M., Ballo, F.N., Sanogo, R., Diallo, D. and Gbeassor, M. (2017) Savoir traditionnel sur les plantes antipaludiques à propriétés analgésiques, utilisées dans le district de Bamako (Mali). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 112, 10985-10995. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v112i1.3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Conti, B., Canale, A., Cioni, P.L. and Flamini, G. (2010) Repellence et Essential Oils from Tropical and Mediterranean Lamiaceae against Stophilus zeamais. Bulletin of Insectology, 62, 197-202.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dedi, J. and Allou, K. (2015) Etude du pouvoir germinatif de quatre variétés de riz que sont GIZA 178, WAB 56-50, LOHININI, DANANE et identification des champions présents sur les grains en germination. Afrique Science, 11, 161-171.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.117294-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xue, W. , Guo, Q. , Zhu, J. , Wu, J. , Huang, Y. and Deng, L. (2022) Research on the Effects of Light Intensity and Seeding Density on the Seed Germination and Seeding Growth of Liriodendron chinense. Journal Agricultural Chemistry and Environment, 11, 24-41. https://doi.org/10.4236/jacen.2022.111003</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>