<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJCD</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-5329</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wjcd.2022.124024</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJCD-116948</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Impact of Acute Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury on Left Ventricular Pressure-Volume Relations in Dogs
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>John</surname><given-names>G. Kingma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Denys</surname><given-names>Simard</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jacques</surname><given-names>R. Rouleau</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>04</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>236</fpage><lpage>249</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: 
  Ischemic conditioning (IC) limits myocyte necrosis after acute myocardial ischemia-reperfusion; however, controversy persists regarding its potential to attenuate LV contractile dysfunction. Pressure-volume (P-V) loop analysis,
   
  via the load-insensitive conductance catheter method, was used to evaluate LV contractility, diastolic function
  ,
   and ventriculo-arterial coupling. The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of IC to improve post-ischemic recovery of LV contractile function. <b>Methods: </b>Twelve anesthetized dogs were randomly distributed to either the IC or the non-IC group; all dogs were subject to 60-min acute coronary occlusion followed by 180-min reperfusion. IC consisted of 4 repeated cycles of 5-min occlusion and 5-min reperfusion of the left main coronary artery. LV P-V relations were constructed under steady-state conditions (by inferior vena cava occlusion) at the beginning and end of the experiments; P-V loops were acquired at different time points before and during ischemia-reperfusion. <b>Results: </b>During ischemia and reperfusion
  ,
   dP/dt<sub>max</sub> decreased significantly compared to baseline in both groups; dP/dt<sub>min</sub>, an indicator of 
  the 
  rate of LV relaxation rate was not affected for either group.
   
  Significant changes in several parameters of LV function including LVEF, SW, tPFR, ESV
  ,
   and EDV caused by ischemia were also identified; none of these negative effects were resorbed, even in part, during reperfusion. <b>Conclusions: </b>Diminished LV contractile efficiency during systole and diastole produced by ischemia-reperfusion did not improve with IC
   
  pre-treatment despite significant endogenous protection against tissue necrosis.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Ischemic Conditioning</kwd><kwd> Ischemia</kwd><kwd> Reperfusion</kwd><kwd> Ventricular Function</kwd><kwd>  Pressure-Volume Relations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Disruptions in blood perfusion produced by coronary artery disease can produce significant injury that results in loss of left ventricular (LV) contractile function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref4">4</xref>]. Post-occlusion restoration of blood flow commonly carried out in cardiac clinics with the use of different reperfusion interventions helps to restore oxidative phosphorylation and availability of high-energy phosphates in salvageable myocardium, limit the extent of cellular injury and improve LV contractile performance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>Left ventricular pressure-volume (P-V) loops provide information on dynamic ventricular changes that occur during the cardiac cycle independent of loading conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref10">10</xref>] and in addition, they provide information on global LV function and intrinsic myocardial properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref12">12</xref>]. Myocardial fiber shortening and LV stroke volume are modulated by preload, afterload, and intrinsic myocardial contractility. In our laboratory, we have been using combined pressure and conductance transducers developed initially by Baan and coworkers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref13">13</xref>] to assess post-ischemic cardiac function in anesthetized canine models. Infarct size correlates directly with myocardial contractility and LV function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref11">11</xref>]. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the effects of acute ischemia-reperfusion injury, in the absence/presence of ischemic conditioning on recovery of LV function.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Dogs were acquired through the Division of Laboratory Animal Services at Laval University; they were housed in individual cages under conditions of constant temperature and humidity and kept on a strict 12:12 h dark-light cycle. Dogs had free access to food and water. This study was approved (#2007-001-2) by the institutional animal welfare committee at Laval University (A5012-01) and was carried out in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, published by the National Institutes of Health (publication 85-23; revised 1996). The experiments were carried out, and results were reported as described in the ARRIVE guidelines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>Surgical Preparation. Anesthesia protocols are described in earlier studies from our laboratory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref18">18</xref>]. Briefly, dogs (both male and female; 20 - 25 Kg) were intubated and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (1% - 2%) and oxygen-enriched room air. Fentanyl (0.005 mg/Kg IV bolus followed by constant infusion at 0.005 mg/Kg/h) was administered for analgesia. Normothermia was conserved with a water-jacketed Micro-Temp heating blanket (Zimmer, Dover, OH, USA); saline was given (250 mL/h IV) to replace fluid loss.</p><p>Dogs were placed in the supine position and vascular introducer sheaths (8Fr, Terumo Medical Corp. USA) were placed in the left and right femoral arteries; a triple-lumen central venous catheter (7Fr, Arrow-Howes<sup>TM</sup>, Arrow Intl. Inc., Reading, PA, USA) was positioned in the right femoral vein.</p><p>A left lateral thoracotomy was performed through the fifth intercostal; the heart was exposed and suspended in a pericardial cradle. A section of the left anterior descending artery branch (distal to the first diagonal branch) was dissected to allow the placement of a vascular clamp for regional coronary artery occlusion. The umbilical tape was placed around the inferior vena cava cranial to the diaphragm. This allowed occlusion of the inferior vena cava later in the experiment to reduce cardiac preload for the construction of LVP-V relations. A catheter (7Fr) was advanced into the main pulmonary artery (for determination of parallel conductance calibration factors using hypertonic saline) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref13">13</xref>]. A solid-state pressure transducer (5Fr, MPC500, Millar Instruments Inc., Houston, TX, USA) was placed in the LV cavity via an apical approach. A 12-electrode conductance catheter (7Fr, CD Leycom, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands) was advanced (via femoral artery) to the LV apex along the longitudinal axis of the ventricle as previously described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref12">12</xref>]. P-V loops were recorded during apnea; blood resistivity was assumed to be constant (150 Ω&#183;cm). A bolus of heparin sodium (500 IU, IV) was given, followed by hourly (100 IU, IV) administrations to prevent undue blood clotting after all catheters were positioned. After all surgical procedures were completed the preparation was allowed to stabilize for 30-min before initiation of the experimental protocol.</p><p>The Millar solid-state pressure transducer was cross-calibrated with both systolic aortic and diastolic left atrial pressure; the conductance catheter was connected to a Sigma 5DF signal conditioning and processing unit. All data were recorded continuously and stored on a computer hard drive for later analysis.</p><p>Experimental Protocol. Dogs (n = 12) were randomly assigned to either control (nIC) or ischemic conditioning (IC) groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). In the nIC group, a 40-min wait period was instituted to allow comparisons between treatments. In the IC group, dogs were subject to 4 cycles of 5-min coronary occlusion and 5-min coronary reperfusion prior to acute coronary occlusion as previously described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref13">13</xref>]. Prior to the onset of ischemia, and at end of reperfusion,</p><p>P-V loops were recorded under steady-state conditions (during apnea); preload was reduced by temporary occlusion of the inferior vena cava (IVC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref20">20</xref>] to construct LVPV relations (LVPVR). Dogs were then subject to 60-min regional coronary occlusion followed by 180-min reperfusion; xylocaine was administered (10 mg IV bolus; Astra Pharma, Inc., Mississauga, ONT, CAN) after 30-min of coronary occlusion and just prior to reperfusion to limit ischemia- or reperfusion-induced arrhythmias. Hearts that fibrillated were cardioverted (DC shock ≤50 Joules) with a cardiac defibrillator (General Electric); if defibrillation was not successful after two attempts, the animal was euthanized and not entered into the data analysis.</p><p>Statistical Analysis. Data are expressed as means &#177; 1 SD. Data normality was verified by the Shapiro-Wilk test (after Cholesky factorization); a linear mixed-effects model was used to identify changes in cardiac variables. A repeated-measure ANOVA (linear mixed model) allowed the determination of statistical differences; the selection of a covariance structure was based on the Akaike information criterion. We compared data using Tukey’s test when no interaction was significant. A p value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical packages R v3.0.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.) and SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Twelve dogs (n  =  6 per group) completed the experimental protocol. The incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during ischemia/reperfusion (0/8 nIC vs 2/8 IC) was not statistically different. Infarct size (area of necrosis as a percent of risk area) was statistically different between the two groups (25 &#177; 5 vs 13 &#177; 3; p = 0.01) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref18">18</xref>]. Changes in cardiac dynamics are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Heart rate (HR) was not significantly reduced between groups but in the IC a significant drop in HR was observed during ischemia. During ischemia and reperfusion, dP/dt<sub>max</sub> decreased significantly compared to baseline in both groups; dP/dt<sub>min</sub> was not changed in either group suggesting little effect on the rate of relaxation. LV end-systolic (ESP) and end-diastolic (EDP) pressure were not significantly modified.</p><p>Stroke volume (SV) was consistent in both experimental groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly reduced by ischemia. Stroke work (SW) decreased during ischemia in both groups and remained lower than baseline levels during reperfusion. The time constant of LV relaxation (Tau) was stable during the experiment in nIC and IC groups; the time to peak filling rate (tPFR) was lower after reperfusion in the IC group (compared to baseline values). End-systolic (ESV) and end-diastolic volume (EDV) increased substantially in both experimental groups (compared to baseline).</p><p>E<sub>es</sub> (elastance at end-systole; mm Hg/mL) of the LVPVR was unchanged but LV volume intercept (V<sub>0</sub>; mL) moved rightward after ischemia-reperfusion principally due to the increased ESV and EDV (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) in both groups; no</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of cardiac hemodynamics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >nIC</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >IC</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Group</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Intervention</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Base</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rep</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Base</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rep</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147 &#177; 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142 &#177; 14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146 &#177; 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148 &#177; 22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136 &#177; 21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149 &#177; 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >dPdt<sub>max</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1809 &#177; 404</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1316 &#177; 358</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1294 &#177; 113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1952 &#177; 653</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1401 &#177; 223</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1393 &#177; 197</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >dPdt<sub>min</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1404 &#177; 169</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1196 &#177; 168</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1278 &#177; 125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1332 &#177; 186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1291 &#177; 198</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1353 &#177; 238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ESP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94 &#177; 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84 &#177; 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88 &#177; 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91 &#177; 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85 &#177; 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83 &#177; 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EDP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 &#177; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#177; 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 &#177; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Data are means &#177; 1 SD. nIC: no ischemic conditioning; IC: ischemic conditioning; HR: heart rate (beats per minute); dPdt<sub>max</sub>: rate of pressure change over time during systole (mmHg/sec); dPdt<sub>min</sub>: rate of pressure change over time during diastole (mmHg/sec); ESP: end-systolic pressure (mm Hg); EDP: end-diastolic pressure (mm Hg).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of LV pressure-volume loop data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >nIC</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >IC</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Group</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Intervention</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Base</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rep</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Base</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rep</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 &#177; 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 &#177; 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 &#177; 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 &#177; 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LVEF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 &#177; 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 &#177; 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 &#177; 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 &#177; 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SW</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1052 &#177; 339</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >941 &#177; 378</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >822 &#177; 349</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1086 &#177; 338</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >759 &#177; 406</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >660 &#177; 309</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tau</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 &#177; 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 &#177; 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 &#177; 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 &#177; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >tPFR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >368 &#177; 65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >382 &#177; 75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >344 &#177; 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >374 &#177; 89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >369 &#177; 54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >314 &#177; 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ESV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 &#177; 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37 &#177; 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 &#177; 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EDV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 &#177; 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 &#177; 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 &#177; 18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 &#177; 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 &#177; 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 &#177; 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Data are means &#177; 1 SD. nIC, IC: no ischemic conditioning, ischemic conditioning; SV: stroke volume (mL); LVEF: LV ejection fraction (%); SW: stroke work (mm Hg/mL); Tau: LV isovolumetric relaxation time constant (ms); tPFR: time to peak filling rate (ms); ESV: end-systolic volume (mL); EDV: end-diastolic volume (mL).</p><p>improvement in this relation (confirmed by a leftward shift of the relation) was observed for the IC group. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the progressive rightward shift of P-V loops with attendant reduction of LV contractility caused by ischemia for each experimental group. Preload recruitable SW plotted against EDV shifted downward and leftward in IC dogs (versus controls) as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. These results indicate that LV work for a given LV volume is diminished by IC; this could potentially influence the recovery of LV contractile function over time.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The present findings, in a canine model of acute ischemia-reperfusion subject to ischemic conditioning, show that LV contractile function is equally impaired regardless of intervention. Herein, we document that while IC markedly reduces infarct size, significant improvement of LV contractile function, in the short term, reported in several earlier studies, was not observed. Interventions (i.e. pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic) that limit ischemic injury should proportionately impact overall post-ischemic cardiac function. To date, reports from a host of studies in various experimental models of ischemic conditioning document either robust improvement, no change or worse contractile function post-ischemia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref21">21</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref26">26</xref>].</p><p>The benefits of IC on infarct size are well known [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref28">28</xref>]; however, it remains unclear whether rapid restoration of LV contractile function is a consequence of smaller ischemic injury, reduced stunning, or both can be achieved. In globally ischemic isolated rabbit hearts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref29">29</xref>] and in situ canine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref30">30</xref>] and porcine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref31">31</xref>] hearts, no real beneficial effect of IC on post-ischemic ventricular dysfunction independent of reduction in infarct size has been demonstrated. In animal studies LV contractile function has mostly been assessed using regional wall motion (wall thickening, systolic segment shortening) methods; the accuracy of these methods is principally determinant of crystal placement within the ischemic or under the perfused region. It remains unclear whether improved post-ischemic LV function provided by IC is due to an attenuation of myocardial stunning or infarction; however, at least one study (using sonomicrometry) has reported beneficial effects of IC on regional contractile function in pigs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref23">23</xref>]. To date, no significant relation between infarct size and contractile function has been reported.</p><p>Preservation of high-energy phosphates and stable myocardial oxygen consumption within ischemic myocardium may explain ischemic conditioning mediated protection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref32">32</xref>]. More than 30 years ago, Reimer and colleagues documented that brief, repeated ischemia slowed the rate of high-energy phosphate consumption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref33">33</xref>]; washout of ischemic catabolites during each reperfusion period could potentially reduce myocyte injury since high-energy phosphate pools are more readily recharged and capacity for anaerobic glycolysis during subsequent coronary occlusion is restored [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref35">35</xref>]. During ischemia, myocardial energy demand is reduced due to the downregulation of LV contractile function. As such, metabolic integrity (i.e. high-energy phosphate levels) of the ischemic myocardium is prolonged such that myocardium should potentially regain contractile function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref36">36</xref>]. Reduced basal myocardial metabolism produced by IC could lead to conservation of myocardial energy reserves to presumably preserve LV contractility, diastolic function, and ventriculo-arterial coupling. However, the ability to resist irreversible ischemic injury also depends on various factors such as duration and severity of ischemia. Tolerance to ischemia-induced myocardial necrosis has been documented with both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments; cardioprotection by ischemic conditioning also limits severe post-ischemic ventricular dysrhythmias [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref38">38</xref>] and endothelial dysfunction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref39">39</xref>].</p><p>Ventricular properties (systolic and diastolic) depend on muscle mass, LV chamber architecture, and geometry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref40">40</xref>]. Because blood pressure is a highly regulated process even marginal deviations from the norm can produce some manifestation of pathology. Normal LV function depends on intricate interactions between contractility, heart rate, pre- and after-load [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref41">41</xref>]. In the clinical setting, LV systolic function estimates of LVEF can be obtained by direct assessment of ventricular volumes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref42">42</xref>] using echocardiography or radionuclide ventriculography [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref45">45</xref>]; abnormal LVEF illustrates the inability of the cardiovascular system to modulate contractile and loading conditions to support normal homeostasis. However, LVEF is considered a poor marker of LV intrinsic contractility because it is strongly influenced by LV loading conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref46">46</xref>]. As such, LVEF is more of a global index of cardiovascular performance and should be considered as a ventriculo-arterial coupling index that is related to LV mechanical efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref47">47</xref>]. In the present study, ischemia caused a significant reduction of LVEF that was not ameliorated by IC pre-treatment; reperfusion of the ischemic vascular bed was unable to provide immediate improvement of LVEF. The conductance catheter method (i.e. gold standard for in vivo determination of systolic contractile performance in the intact heart) provides a comprehensive evaluation of LV function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref48">48</xref>]. This method (an overview of LV analysis) has been published by Kerkhof and coworkers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref49">49</xref>] ) enables continuous P-V loop analysis to describe intrinsic ventricular pump properties that are independent of preload, afterload [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref50">50</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref51">51</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref52">52</xref>] and within limits heart rate, in the normal LV volume range [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref50">50</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref55">55</xref>]. End-systolic P-V relations provide information that includes end-systolic elastance and volume at zero pressure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref56">56</xref>]; the latter is a result of a linearized approach to the determination of E<sub>es</sub>.</p><p>This study has some limitations; we used dogs with a health profile distinctly different from humans with heart disease and other comorbidities. However, dogs are comparable to humans with respect to heart size and coronary physiology; a large and diverse data bank exists for diverse cardiovascular studies using canine models, which favors comparisons with the present study. The sample size was small and the post-ischemic follow-up period was much shorter than necessary to provide a better evaluation of the potential recovery of LV function. Second, an open-chest, anesthetised dog model was used; anesthesia may, in and of itself, afford a level of protection against ischemic injury [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref57">57</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref59">59</xref>] that could result in improved post-ischemic recovery of LV contractile function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref60">60</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116948-ref61">61</xref>]. Potential protective mechanisms include activation of intracellular signalling pathways; however, the same is true for IC protocols so we may simply be looking at a question of timing. Finally, future studies with prolonged reperfusion or recovery periods after ischemia could potentially provide data that would be more clinically relevant.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The influence of IC on post-ischemic LV contractile function in different animal models remains inconclusive. In the present study, we used the conductance catheter method which uses after-load insensitive measures to evaluate LV contractile function. While IC is known to conserve cardiac energy reserves during the relatively brief cycles of hypoperfusion and reperfusion and also significantly reduces myocardial injury, we were unable to demonstrate an expected positive effect on overall LV contractile function after exposure to a prolonged period of ischemia.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to acknowledge Serge Simard for providing the statistical analyses of the experimental data used in this report. These studies were funded by an operating grant from the Quebec Heart and Stroke Foundation.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose for this work.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Kingma, J.G., Simard, D. and Rouleau, J.R. (2022) Impact of Acute Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury on Left Ventricular Pressure-Volume Relations in Dogs. World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, 12, 236-249. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcd.2022.124024</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>List of Abbreviations</title><p>LV: left ventricular</p><p>P-V: pressure-volume</p><p>IC: ischemic conditioning</p><p>nIC: no ischemic conditioning</p><p>LVEF: LV ejection fraction</p><p>SV: stroke volume</p><p>SW: stroke work</p><p>ESV: end-systolic volume</p><p>EDV: end-diastolic volume</p><p>ESP: end-systolic pressure</p><p>EDP: end-diastolic pressure</p><p>IVC: inferior vena cava</p><p>tPFR: time to peak filling rate</p><p>E<sub>es</sub>: LV elastance at end-systole</p><p>V<sub>0</sub>: LV volume at zero pressure</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.116948-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burkhoff, D., Yue, D.T., Oikawa, R.Y., Franz, M.R., Schaefer, J. and Sagawa, K. (1987) Influence of Ventricular Contractility on Non-Work-Related Myocardial Oxygen Consumption. Heart and Vessels, 3, 66-72.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02058521</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suga, H., Goto, Y., Yasumura, Y., Nozawa, T., Futaki, S., Tanaka, N., et al. (1988) O2 Consumption of Dog Heart under Decreased Coronary Perfusion and Propranolol. American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 254, H292-H303. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1988.254.2.H292</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Applegate, R.J. (1991) Load Dependence of Left Ventricular Diastolic Pressure-Volume Relations during Short-Term Coronary Artery Occlusion. Circulation, 83, 661-673. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.83.2.661</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Theroux, P., Franklin, D., Ross Jr., J. and Kemper, WS. (1974) Regional Myocardial Function during Acute Coronary Artery Occlusion and Its Modification by Pharmacologic Agents in the Dog. Circulation Research, 35, 896-908.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.35.6.896</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clarke, K., O’Connor, A.J. and Willis, R.J. (1987) Temporal Relation between Energy Metabolism and Myocardial Function during Ischemia and Reperfusion. American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 253, H412-H421. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1987.253.2.H412</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jacobus, W.E. (1985) Respiratory Control and the Integration of Heart High-Energy Phosphate Metabolism by Mitochondrial Creatine Kinase. Annual Review of Physiology, 47, 707-725. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.47.030185.003423</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sagawa, K., Suga, H., Shoukas, A.A. and Bakalar, K.M. (1977) End-Systolic Pressure/volume Ratio: A New Index of Ventricular Contractility. American Journal of Cardiology, 40, 748-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(77)90192-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suga, H. (1969) Time Course of Left Ventricular Pressure-Volume Relationship under Various Enddiastolic Volume. Japanese Heart Journal 10, 509-515.  
https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.10.509</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lips, D.J., Van Der Nagel, T., Steendijk, P., Palmen, M., Janssen, B.J., Van Dantzig, J.M., et al. (2004) Left Ventricular Pressure-Volume Measurements in Mice: Comparison of Closed-Chest versus Open-Chest Approach. Basic Research in Cardiology, 99, 351-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-004-0476-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krenz, M. (2009) Conductance, Admittance, and Hypertonic Saline: Should We Take Ventricular Volume Measurements with a Grain of Salt? Journal of Applied Physiology, 107, 1683-1684. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01089.2009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ellenbroek, G.H., Van Hout, G.P., Timmers, L., Doevendans, P.A., Pasterkamp, G. and Hoefer, I.E. (2016) Primary Outcome Assessment in a Pig Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Journal of Visualized Experiments, No. 116, Article ID: 54021. https://doi.org/10.3791/54021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baan, J., Van Der Velde, E.T. and Steendijk, P. (1992) Ventricular Pressure-Volume Relations in Vivo. European Heart Journal, 13, 2-6.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/13.suppl_E.2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baan, J., Van Der Velde, E., De Bruin, H.G., Smeenk, G.J., Koops, J., Van Dijk, A., et al. (1984) Continuous Measurement of Left Ventricular Volume in Animals and Humans by Conductance Catheter. Circulation, 70, 812-823.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.70.5.812</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kilkenny, C., Browne, W.J., Cuthill, I.C., Emerson, M. and Altman, D.G. (2010) Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLoS Biology, 8, e1000412.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kingma, J.G. (2018) Inhibition of Na+/H+ Exchanger with EMD 87580 Does Not Confer Greater Cardioprotection beyond Preconditioning on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Normal Dogs. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 23, 254-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074248418755120</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kingma Jr., J.G., Simard, D. and Rouleau, J.R. (2015) Nitric Oxide Bioavailability Affects Cardiovascular Regulation Dependent on Cardiac Nerve Status. Autonomic Neuroscience, 187, 70-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2014.11.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kingma Jr., J.G., Simard, D., Voisine, P. and Rouleau, J.R. (2014) Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Myocardial Blood Flow Regulation in Dogs. Nephron Experimental Nephrology, 126, 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1159/000362090</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kingma, J.G., Simard, D., Voisine, P. and Rouleau, J.R. (2013) Influence of Cardiac Decentralization on Cardioprotection. PLoS ONE, 8, Article ID: e79190.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079190</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Der Linden, L.P., Van Der Velde, E.T., Van Houwelingen, H.C., Bruschke, A.V.G. and Baan, J. (1994) Determinants of End-Systolic Pressure during Different Load Alterations in the in Situ Left Ventricle. American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 267, H1895-H906.  
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1994.267.5.H1895</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cingolani, O.H. and Kass, D.A. (2011) Pressure-Volume Relation Analysis of Mouse Ventricular Function. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 301, H2198-H2206. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00781.2011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cave, A.C. and Apstein, C.S. (1996) Preconditioning-Induced Protection against Post-Ischemic Contractile Dysfunction: Inhibitory Effect of Tissue Washout. Basic Research in Cardiology, 91, 16-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00788854</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cohen, M.V., Yang, X.M. and Downey, J.M. (1999) Smaller Infarct after Preconditioning Does Not Predict Extent of Early Functional Improvement of Reperfused Heart. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 277, H1754-H1761. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.5.H1754</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qiu, Y., Tang, X.-L., Park, S.-W., Sun, J.-Z., Kalya, A. and Bolli, R. (1997) The Early and Late Phases of Ischemic Preconditioning. A Comparative Analysis of Their Effects on Infarct Size, Myocardial Stunning, and Arrhythmias in Conscious Pigs Undergoing a 40-Minute Coronary Occlusion. Circulation Research, 80, 730-742.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.80.5.730</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sunderdiek, U., Schmitz-Spanke, S., Korbmacher, B., Gams, E. and Schipke, J.D. (2002) Preconditioning: Myocardial Function and Energetics during Coronary Hypoperfusion and Reperfusion. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 74, 2147-2155.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03882-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jenkins, D.P., Pugsley, W.B. and Yellon, D.M. (1995) Ischaemic Preconditioning in a Model of Global Ischaemia: Infarct Size Limitation, But No Reduction of Stunning. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 27, 1623-1632.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2828(95)90590-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cohen, M.V., Liu, G.S. and Downey, J.M. (1991) Preconditioning Causes Improved Wall Motion As Well As Smaller Infarcts after Transient Coronary Occlusion in Rabbits. Circulation, 84, 341-349. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.84.1.341</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kingma, J.G. (2014) Conditioning Strategies Limit Cellular Injury? World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, 4, 539-547. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcd.2014.411065</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kloner, R.A. and Rezkalla, S.H. (2006) Preconditioning, Postconditioning and Their Application to Clinical Cardiology. Cardiovascular Research, 70, 297-307.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.01.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hendrikx, M., Toshima, Y., Mubagwa, K. and Flameng, W. (1993) Improved Functional Recovery after Ischemic Preconditioning in the Globally Ischemic Rabbit Heart Is Not Mediated by Adenosine A1 Receptor Activation. Basic Research in Cardiology, 88, 576-593. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00788876</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ovize, M., Przyklenk, K., Hale, S.L. and Kloner, R.A. (1992) Preconditioning Does Not Attenuate Myocardial Stunning. Circulation, 85, 2247-2254.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.85.6.2247</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kimura, Y., Iyengar, J., Subramanian, R., Cordis, G.A. and Das, D.K. (1992) Preconditioning of the Heart by Repeated Stunning: Attenuation of Postischemic Dysfunction. Basic Research in Cardiology, 87, 128-138.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00801960</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Flameng, W. (1995) New Strategies for Intraoperative Myocardial Protection. Current Opinion in Cardiology, 10, 577-583.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/00001573-199511000-00005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reimer, K.A., Murry, C.E., Yamasawa, I. and Hill, M.L. (1986) Four Brief Periods of Myocardial Ischemia Cause No Cumulative ATP Loss Or Necrosis. American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 251, H1306-H1315.  
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1986.251.6.H1306</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lange, R., Ingwall, J.S., Hale, S.L., Alker, K.J. and Kloner, R.A. (1984) Effects of Recurrent Ischemia on Myocardial High Energy Phosphate Content in Canine Hearts. Basic Research in Cardiology, 79, 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01908148</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Henrichs, K.J., Matsuoka, H. and Schaper, J. (1987) Influence of Repetitive Coronary Occlusions on Myocardial Adenine Nucleosides, High Energy Phosphates and Ultrastructure. Basic Research in Cardiology, 82, 557-565.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01907226</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schulz, R., Rose, J., Martin, C., Brodde, O.-E. and Heusch, G. (1993) Development of Short-Term Myocardial Hibernation. Its Limitation by the Severity of Ischemia and Inotropic Stimulation. Circulation, 88, 684-695.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.88.2.684</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lawson, C.S., Coltart, D.J. and Hearse, D.J. (1993) The Antiarrhythmic Action of Ischaemic Preconditioning in Isolated Blood Perfused Rat Hearts Does Not Involve Functional Gi Proteins. Cardiovascular Research, 27, 681-687.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/27.4.681</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parratt, J.R. (1994) Protection of the Heart by Ischaemic Preconditioning: Mechanisms and Possibilities for Pharmacological Exploitation. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 15, 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-6147(94)90129-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Richard, V., Kaeffer, N., Tron, C. and Thuillez, C. (1994) Ischemic Preconditioning Protects against Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction Induced by Ischemia and Reperfusion. Circulation, 89, 1254-1261. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.89.3.1254</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burkhoff, D., Mirsky, I. and Suga, H. (2005) Assessment of Systolic and Diastolic Ventricular Properties via Pressure-Volume Analysis: a Guide for Clinical, Translational, and Basic Researchers. American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 289, H501-H512. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00138.2005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lankhaar, J.W., Rovekamp, F.A., Steendijk, P., Faes, T.J., Westerhof, B.E., Kind, T., et al. (2009) Modeling the Instantaneous Pressure-Volume Relation of the Left Ventricle: a Comparison of Six Models. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 37, 1710-1726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9742-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonnet, B., Jourdan, F., Du Cailar, G. and Fesler, P. (2017) Noninvasive Evaluation of Left Ventricular Elastance According to Pressure-Volume Curves Modeling in Arterial Hypertension. American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 313, H237-H243. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00086.2017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharir, T., Feldman, M.D., Haber, H., Feldman, A.M., Marmor, A., Becker, L.C., et al. (1994) Ventricular Systolic Assessment in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy by Preload-Adjusted Maximal Power. Validation and Noninvasive Application. Circulation, 89, 2045-2053. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.89.5.2045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">de Simone, G., Devereux, R.B., Ganau, A., Hahn, R.T, Saba, P.S., Mureddu, G.F., et al. (1996) Estimation of Left Ventricular Chamber and Stroke Volume by Limited M-Mode Echocardiography and Validation by Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography. American Journal of Cardiology, 78, 801-807.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00425-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">King, D.L., Gopal, A.S., King Jr., D.L. and Shao, M.Y. (1993) Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: In Vitro Validation for Quantitative Measurement of Total and “Infarct” Surface Area. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 6, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-7317(14)80258-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Konstam, M.A. and Abboud, F.M. (2017) Ejection Fraction: Misunderstood and Overrated (Changing the Paradigm in Categorizing Heart Failure). Circulation, 135, 717-719. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025795</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sunagawa, K., Maughan, W.L. and Sagawa, K. (1985) Optimal Arterial Resistance for the Maximal Stroke Work Studied in Isolated Canine Left Ventricle. Circulation Research, 56, 586-595. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.56.4.586</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clark, J.E. and Marber, M.S. (2013) Advancements in Pressure-Volume Catheter Technology—Stress Remodelling after Infarction. Experimental Physiology, 98, 614-621. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2012.064733</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kerkhof, P.L.M., Kuznetsova, T., Ali, R. and Handly, N. (2018) Left Ventricular Volume Analysis As a Basic Tool to Describe Cardiac Function. Advances in Physiology Education, 42, 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00140.2017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sagawa, K. (1978) The Ventricular Pressure-Volume Diagram Revisited. Circulation Research, 43, 677-687. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.43.5.677</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suga, H. and Sagawa, K. (1974) Instantaneous Pressure-Volume Relationships and Their Ratio in the Excised, Supported Canine Left Ventricle. Circulation Research, 35, 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.35.1.117</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mehmel, H.C., Stockins, B., Ruffmann, K., Von Olshausen, K., Schuler, G. and Kubler, W. (1981) The Linearity of the End-Systolic Pressure-Volume Relationship in Man and Its Sensitivity for Assessment of Left Ventricular Function. Circulation, 63, 1216-1222. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.63.6.1216</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sagawa, K. (1981) The End-Systolic Pressure-Volume Relation of the Ventricle: Definition, Modifications and Clinical Use. Circulation, 63, 1223-1227.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.63.6.1223</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Little, W.C. and Freeman, G.L. (1987) Description of LV Pressure-Volume Relations by Time-Varying Elastance and Source Resistance. American Physiological Society Journal: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 253, H83-H90.  
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1987.253.1.H83</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krosl, P. and Abel, F.L. (1998) Problems with Use of the End Systolic Pressure-Volume Slope as an Indicator of Left Ventricular Contractility: An Alternate Method. Shock, 10, 285-291. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024382-199810000-00009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Claessens, T.E., Rietzschel, E.R., De Buyzere, M.L., De Bacquer, D., De Backer, G., Gillebert, T.C., et al. (2007) Noninvasive Assessment of Left Ventricular and Myocardial Contractility in Middle-Aged Men and Women: Disparate Evolution above the Age of 50? American Physiological Society Journal: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 292, H856-H865. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00759.2006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miki, T., Cohen, M.V. and Downey, J.M. (1998) Opioid Receptor Contributes to Ischemic Preconditioning Through Protein Kinase C Activation in Rabbits. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 186, 3-12.  
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006856124501</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kikuchi, C., Dosenovic, S. and Bienengraeber, M. (2015) Anaesthetics As Cardioprotectants: Translatability and Mechanism. British Journal of Pharmacology, 172, 2051-2061. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.12981</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gross, E.R., Peart, J.N., Hsu, A.K., Auchampach, J.A. and Gross, G.J. (2005) Extending the Cardioprotective Window Using a Novel Delta-Opioid Agonist Fentanyl Isothiocyanate Via the PI3-Kinase Pathway. American Physiological Society Journal: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 288, H2744-H2749.  
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00918.2004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meybohm, P., Gruenewald, M., Albrecht, M., Muller, C., Zitta, K., Foesel, N., et al. (2011) Pharmacological Postconditioning with Sevoflurane after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Reduces Myocardial Dysfunction. Critical Care, 15, Article No. R241.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10496</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116948-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Knapp, J., Bergmann, G., Bruckner, T., Russ, N., Bottiger, B.W. and Popp, E. (2013) Pre- and Postconditioning Effect of Sevoflurane on Myocardial Dysfunction after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Rats. Resuscitation, 84, 1450-1455.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.04.012</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>