<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOph</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Ophthalmology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-7408</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojoph.2022.122015</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOph-116867</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  External Dacryocystorhinostomy: 4 Years’ Experience from CHU-IOTA in Mali
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nouhoum</surname><given-names>Guirou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sory</surname><given-names>Ibrahim Bamanta</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nganga</surname><given-names>Ngabou Charles Gerauld Freddy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>Konipo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdoulaye</surname><given-names>Napo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Modibo</surname><given-names>Sissoko</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Seydou</surname><given-names>Bakayoko</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Japhet</surname><given-names>Théra</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fatoumata</surname><given-names>Sylla</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lamine</surname><given-names>Traoré</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brazzaville, Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of the Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Institut d’Ophtalmologie Tropicale d’Afrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Université des Sciences des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>04</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>152</fpage><lpage>157</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>7,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Aim: To analyze the clinical characteristics and the surgical outcomes of external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical record of 62 patients who underwent external DCR for NLDO between November 2015 and November 2019 at CHU-IOTA in Mali. The preoperative clinical findings and the postoperative outcomes after a minimum follow up of 3 months were analyzed. Results: epiphora, discharges and canthal swelling were main symptoms of the 62 patients (68% women, 32% men), with the mean age of 47 years (10 - 76). Among them, 36 had chronic dacryocystitis, 12 had a traumatic NLDO and 8 followed a septal deviation. The majority (77%) were operated on under local anesthesia with sedation. Bicanalicular intubation was performed in 29% of patients. After postoperative follow up of at least 3 months, only 8 patients had persistent watering, thus a subjective functional success of 87%. Conclusion: In the nasolacrimal duct obstruction, most often secondary to chronic dacryocystitis, external dacryocystorhinostomy remains a technique of choice with very good success.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Dacryocystorhinostomy</kwd><kwd> Dacryocystitis</kwd><kwd> Epiphora</kwd><kwd> Silicone</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is the standard treatment technique for nasolacrimal duct obstruction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref1">1</xref>]. It consists of creating an anastomosis between the lacrimal sac and the adjacent nasal cavity through a bony ostium. It was first described by Toti in 1904 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref2">2</xref>] and since then this technique has undergone several changes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref7">7</xref>]. The external technique and the endonasal technique of DCR have shown similar results in several studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref8">8</xref>]. For a shorter surgical time and greater patient satisfaction, the endonasal technique is the most practiced in several developed countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref9">9</xref>]. Our choice for external DCR is explained by the fact that it is the standard technique for treating the obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct with an accessible technology platform for developing countries, but also because it offers better visualization of anatomical features [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref1">1</xref>]. Its main indication is the obstruction of the lacrimal drainage system or the nasal lacrimal duct [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>The aim of this work was to analyze the clinical characteristics and surgical results of external dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 62 patients operated by external dacryocystorhinostomy for complete nasolacrimal duct obstruction on syringing between November 2015 and November 2019 at the CHU-IOTA in Bamako/Mali. Patients with complete postoperative follow-up of at least 3 months were included. Patients who had a functional obstruction, and those with insufficient follow-up were excluded. Patients were hospitalized the day before the day of surgery and are discharged the day after. Preoperative clinical data and postoperative results after a minimum monitoring of 3 months were analyzed. Success was the subjective absence of lacrimation observed by the patient and clinically by the permeability to canalicular irrigation.</p><p>Surgical technique: DCR is performed after general anesthesia or local anesthesia plus sedation.</p><p>After incision of the skin and orbicularis muscle, the periosteum is separated from the bone using the periosteal elevator to expose the anterior lacrimal crest (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>An osteotomy of approximately 10 - 15 mm is created using the Kerrison rongeur (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The lacrimal points are dilated, the sac is located using a Bowman-type canalicular probe, then opened, using a U-shaped incision, followed by the opening of the nasal mucosa. This is followed by an anastomosis of the nasal and lacrimal mucous membranes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a)).</p><p>A bicanalicular nasal intubation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)) is performed before suturing the skin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)). Extubating is done after one month in simple cases and after 3 months in complicated cases (mainly post-traumatic and septal deviations).</p><p>Statistical analysis was done using SPPS 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The left eye was predominant (55%). Epiphora associated or not with secretions and canthal swelling were the reasons for consultation of 62 patients (68% women, 32% men), with an average age of 47 years (10 - 76). Among them, 36 had a chronic dacryocystitis, 12 had a nasolacrimal obstruction of traumatic origin and 8 had a septal deviation. The pressure next to the sac caused muco-purulent reflux in 57% of cases. Demographic and clinical characteristics are grouped in the table. The majority 77% (48/62) were operated on under local anesthesia plus sedation. The hemodynamic constants remained stable per and postoperatively. Bicanalicular intubation was performed in 29% of patients. Abundant bleeding was the only intraoperative complication (10/62) and the average bleeding was 15 ml &#177; 3.08. The average surgery time was 47 &#177; 12 minutes. After postoperative monitoring of at least 3 months, only 8 patients, or 13%, had persistent lacrimation, thus a functional success rate of 87% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). One in three patients (38%) had a visible skin scar. The satisfaction of the surgeon, the anesthesiologist and the patient were excellent.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Epiphora is the main functional sign motivating the consultation with chronic dacryocystitis as a corollary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref11">11</xref>]. Our study, as in several others, finds a higher frequency of dacryocystitis in the elderly female population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref11">11</xref>]. The two eyes can be affected in a quasi-similar way, Rabina [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref12">12</xref>] as in our study found a left predominance. Our average age of 47 years is similarly found in several studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref13">13</xref>]; but the peak is after the sixties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref14">14</xref>]. We intubated with a silicone tube about 1/3 of the patients. Mjarkesh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref14">14</xref>] found that canalicular intubation or non-intubation gave similar results. Some authors have found an improvement in the result with the use of a silicone tube [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref17">17</xref>]. External dacryocystorhinostomy is simple, reproducible, and effective technique with a success rate most often greater than 80% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref20">20</xref>].</p><p>In recent years endonasal and laser dacryocystorhinostomies have become very popular [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref17">17</xref>]. Their advantages are numerous, as the absence of skin scars. In our study, as in that of Mjarkesh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116867-ref14">14</xref>], one out of three patients had a visible skin scar.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Clinical and surgical data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age: average 47 ans</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (16%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (16%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (10%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 and over</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (52%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Etiologies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chronic dacryocystitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (58%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traumatism</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (19%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Idiopathic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nasolacrimal duct Lithiasis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Septal deviation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (13%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type of anesthesia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >General</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (23%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Local + Sedation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (77%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silicone tube</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (29%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absence of epiphora/permeability to irrigation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54 (87%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Persistent epiphora (Failure)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (13%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In nasolacrimal duct obstruction, most often secondary to chronic dacryocystitis, external dacryocystorhinostomy remains a technique of choice with favorable results.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Guirou, N., Bamanta, S.I., Freddy, N.N.C.G., Konipo, A., Napo, A., Sissoko, M., Bakayoko, S., Th&#233;ra, J., Sylla, F. and Traor&#233;, L. (2022) External Dacryocystorhinostomy: 4 Years’ Experience from CHU-IOTA in Mali. Open Journal of Ophthalmology, 12, 152-157. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojoph.2022.122015</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.116867-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tarbet, K.J. and Custer, P.L. (July, 1995) External Dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology, 102, 1065-1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(95)30910-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Toti</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1904</year>)<article-title>Nuovo metodo conservatore di cura radicale delle soppurazioni croniche del sacco lacrimale (dacriocistorinostomia)</article-title><source> Clínica Moderna (Firenze)</source><volume> 10</volume>,<fpage> 385</fpage>-<lpage>387</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dave, T.V., Javed Ali, M., Sravani, P. and Naik, M.N. (2012) Subciliary Incision for External Dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 28, 341-345. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e31825e697c</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ekinci, M., &amp;#199;a&amp;#287;atay, H.H., Oba, M.E., Yazar, Z., Kaplan, A., G&amp;#246;k&amp;#231;e, G., et al. (December, 2013) The Long-Term Follow-Up Results of External Dacryocystorhinostomy Skin Incision Scar with “W Incision”. Orbit, 32, 349-355. https://doi.org/10.3109/01676830.2013.822898</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elwan, S. (January, 2003) A Randomized Study Comparing DCR with and without Excision of the Posterior Mucosal Flap. Orbit, 22, 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1076/orbi.22.1.7.14011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raja, W., Bhat Mohd, A. and Mahrukh, M. (2019) Comparison between Conventional DCR and DCR Augmented with Mitomycin-C. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 6, 716-719.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, H.R., Sharma, A.K. and Sharma, R. (October, 2015) Modified External Dacryocystorhinostomy in Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 9, NC01-NC05. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/15940.6624</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fayet, B. and Racy, E. (2012) Dacryocystorhinostomie par voie endonasale. EMC— Ophtalmologie, 9, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0246-0343(12)55706-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Woog, J.J., Kennedy, R.H., Custer, P.L., Kaltreider, S.A., Meyer, D.R. and Camara, J.G. (2001) Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology, 108, 2369-2377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00945-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alnawaiseh, M., Mihailovic, N., Wieneke, A.C., Prokosch, V., Rosentreter, A., Merté, R.L., et al. (2016) Long-Term Outcomes of External Dacryocystorhinostomy in the Age of Transcanalicular Microendoscopic Techniques. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2016, Article ID: 5918457. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5918457</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mishra, D., Bhushan, P., Sinha, B., Bhaskar, G. and Rao, R. (2019) External Dacryocystorhinostomy Conventional Surgery versus Pawar Implant: A Comparative Study. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 67, 1143-1147. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1889_18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rabina, G., Golan, S., Neudorfer, M. and Leibovitch, I. (2013) External Dacryocystorhinostomy: Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes in Patients with and without Previous Dacryocystitis. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2013, Article ID: 287524. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/287524</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rizvi, S.A.R., Saquib, M., Maheshwari, R., Gupta, Y., Iqbal, Z. and Maheshwari, P. (2016) Cosmetic Evaluation of Surgical Scars after External Dacryocystorhinostomy. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 9, 1745-1750</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mjarkesh, M.M., Morel, X. and Renard, G. (2012) étude de la cicatrice cutanée de la dacryocystorhinostomie par voie faciale. Journal Fran&amp;#231;ais d’Ophtalmologie, 35, 88-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2011.02.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saiju, R., Morse, L.J., Weinberg, D., Shrestha, M.K. and Ruit, S. (September, 2009) Prospective Randomized Comparison of External Dacryocystorhinostomy with and without Silicone Intubation. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 93, 1220-1222. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.147819</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ing, E.B., Bedi, H., Hussain, A., Zakrewski, H., Ing, R., Nijhawan, N., et al. (October, 2018) Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Dacryocystorhinostomy with and without Silicone Intubation. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 53, 466-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.12.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sreedharan, T., Sukumaran, S. and Thomas, P.C. (2016) Outcome of Endonasal DCR with and without Bicanalicular Silastic Tube Insertion—A Clinical Prospective Comparative Study. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare, 3, 5291-5294. https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2016/1100</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dave, T.V., Ezeanosike, E., Naik, M.N. and Ali, M.J. (2019) Outcomes in Pediatric External Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Single-Center Experience. Orbit, 38, 103-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2018.1477807</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Delaney, Y.M. (May, 2002) External Dacryocystorhinostomy for the Treatment of Acquired Partial Nasolacrimal Obstruction in Adults. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 86, 533-535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.5.533</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116867-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pandya, V.B., Lee, S., Benger, R., Danks, J.J., Kourt, G., Martin, P.A., et al. (2010) The Role of Mucosal Flaps in External Dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit, 29, 324-327. https://doi.org/10.3109/01676831003664392</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>