<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MSCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-6045</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/msce.2022.104002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MSCE-116861</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Physico-Mechanical Properties of Bio-Based Bricks
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Valentin</surname><given-names>Makomra</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lionel</surname><given-names>Karga Tapsia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Benoit</surname><given-names>Ndiwe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maxime</surname><given-names>Dawoua Kaoutoing</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Noel</surname><given-names>Konai</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abel</surname><given-names>Njom</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tawe</surname><given-names>Laynde</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Danwe</surname><given-names>Raidandi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>National Advanced School of Publics Works, University of Yaounde1, BP 510 Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Higher Technical Teacher Training College of the University of Douala, BP 1872 Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Laboratory of Civil Engineering and Mechanical, National Advanced School of Engineering, University of Yaoundé 1, BP 8390, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mechanical Petroleum and Gas Engineering, National Advanced School of Mines and Petroleum Industries of the University of Maroua, PO BOX 08 Kaélé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Laboratory of Materials, Architecture and Civil Engineering, National Advanced School of Engineering, University of Maroua, BP 46, Maroua, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>04</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>16</fpage><lpage>29</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The aim of this work is to improve the high performance of mud bricks. The latter w
  as
   reinforced with rice straws as stabiliser leading to an improvement of the physico-mechanical properties. Thus, the physical characteristics of the clay such as natural water content, density, atterberg limit, plasticity limit (Wp) and plasticity index (Ip) were determined. Their values are respectively 8.39%, 2025.73
   
  Kg/m<sup>3</sup>, 47.66%, 29.75% and 17.91%. The clay used is a low plastic organic silt. The normal proctocol provided an optimum dry density (
  &amp;#611
  OP) of 1.28 Kg/m<sup>3</sup> at an optimum moisture content of 12.42%. The actual density of the straw is 464
   
  Kg/m<sup>3</sup>, its absorption rate reached 206% in 5 min
  s
   and stabilised at 385% at 480 min
  s
   of immersion. The maximum bending and compression strengths are respectively 1.52 and 0.164 MPa. 
  The mud brick absorption coefficients obtained are between 4.875 at 0% straw and 20.573% at 3% straw.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Mud Bricks</kwd><kwd> Physico-Mechanical Characteristics</kwd><kwd> Clay</kwd><kwd> Rice Straw</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>For a long time, researches on the thermo-mechanical properties of mud material in the building of houses have been carried out using several ways of stabilization to improve its mechanical performance and its sensitivity to water, which has given rise to several mud products as: adobe, mud, cob, compressed earth block (CEB) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref1">1</xref>]. This has been the subject of several researches, including: the Mechanical and Thermal Characteristics of Clay Stabilized by Gum Arabic and Reinforced by Rice Straw [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref2">2</xref>]; the Making of a brick based on sand dunes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref3">3</xref>]; the studying of the mechanical characteristics of mud brick stabilized using sugar cane molasses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref4">4</xref>]; the hygro-thermo-mechanical characteristics of structural materials for construction combining kenaf fibers with clay soils [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref5">5</xref>]; the Design, production and qualification of terracotta and raw earth bricks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref6">6</xref>]; the Formulation and characterization of an earth-plant fiber composite: cob [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref7">7</xref>]; the Guide to good practices in raw earth construction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref8">8</xref>]; the Analysis by dialogue test calculation of a 4-point bending test on a sandwich specimen for the compression characterization of long-fiber composites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref9">9</xref>]; the geotechnical tests at the Orl&#233;ans geotechnical laboratory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref10">10</xref>]. Several natural fibers have been proposed as stabilizers, including hemp, flax, jute (in Europe) or even date palm, esparto, rice straw and saw palmetto (in Africa) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>Compared to the history of earthen construction, the adobe technic is an old one, which allows for a wide variety of block sizes in terms of masonry with a relatively low production cost.</p><p>In order to obtain high performance mud bricks, clay and rice straw were used as stabilisers. These bricks using local resources will contribute to the excessive degradation of the houses in the Pitoa area and the cracking of adobe bricks.</p><p>Rice straw is one of the most abundant agricultural resources in Cameroon (especially in the North and Far North) used to stabilise adobe bricks.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Preparation of Samples</title><p>The basic materials used to make the different test specimens are: clay soil and rice straw.</p>Rice Straw<p>Rice straw comes from the same place as the mud. For the manufacture of blocks of mud (adobes) rice straw is crushed to dimensions ranging from 1 to 4 cm.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Physical Characterization of Clay Soil</title><p>The physical characteristics were determined from geotechnical tests in order to propose a classification for clay soil from the district of Pitoa at a place called Langui. It is located in the North Cameroon region, Department of B&#233;nou&#233;, 15 km from Garoua. It is chosen on the basis of its availability and abundance in that area. It is extracted after stripping the topsoil to a depth of 10 cm using a hoe.</p><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Test of the Water Content</title><p>The water content was determined by the method of weighing wet weight, then dry weight after oven drying according to the standard (NF P 94 050). Samples taken in the dry state and in powder form were placed in a tare and weighed (Pmh). Then they were introduced into the oven for drying. Once dry, they were weighed again (Pms). The mass of water was deduced and the water content of each tare of this sample was determined by the following relationship (1):</p><p>w ( 1 % ) = 100 &#215; Pmh − Pms Pms (1)</p><p>With: Pmh: weight of wet material; Pms: dry material weight; w (%): water content.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Density of Solid Grains</title><p>The density of the soil was measured in accordance with standard NF P 94-054 using a water pycnometer. The pycnometer and its cap were weighed (m<sub>1</sub>), then the sample was introduced into the pycnometer and weighed with the cap (m<sub>2</sub>), then the pycnometer was filled with water, up to the mark. The whole was shaken to obtain a homogeneous mixture and weighed, after letting out all the air bubbles (m<sub>3</sub>). Finally, the pycnometer was emptied, cleaned, dried and filled with water up to the stopper mark and weighed (m<sub>4</sub>). The density is obtained from the expression in Relation (2). The density of the solid particles is obtained by taking the arithmetic mean of eight measurements on a soil sample</p><p>P s = ρ w &#215; m 2 − m 1 m 4 + m 2 − m 1 − m 3 (2)</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_3"><title>2.2.3. Particle Size Analysis by Sieving</title><p>This test was carried out according to the NF P 94-056 and 057 standard. The dry sample taken for the study was soaked for one hour in a plastic bucket and washed with a 0.08 mm sieve. The sample was then dried in the sun and in an oven. Finally, it was sieved with interlocking square mesh sieve sets (5; 2; 1; 0.5; and 0.08) in mm and the accumulated rejects weighed.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_4"><title>2.2.4. Atterberg Limit</title><p>The tests defined by Casagrande are carried out on the floor mortar (d &lt; 0.4 mm) according to the procedure of standard NF P 94 051.</p><p>➢ Liquiditylimit (W<sub>L</sub>)</p><p>The liquidity limit of a soil (W<sub>L</sub>) is determined using the Casagrande cup. The well homogenised mixture is placed in the cup and spread well with a spatula. The thickness in the centre of the material should be 15 to 25 mm. The end of the test is announced when the groove in the material closes to a length of approximately 12 to 13 mm. The number of strokes is recorded and samples are taken from the vicinity of the closure area to determine their water content. The test is repeated at least eight times while varying the water content in order to cover a range of 15 to 35 strokes. For this material, lip closure is obtained at 17, 19, 27 and 34 strokes.</p><p>➢ Plasticitylimit (W<sub>p</sub>)</p><p>The sample is spread out on a wooden plate, to make it lose a certain quantity of water and then a roll is made. The plasticity limit is obtained when the breakage occurs during the preparation of the roll or during its lifting. The clay samples taken from these rolls are dried in an oven at 105˚C for 24 hours to determine their water content. The plasticity index, noted I<sub>p</sub>, is expressed by the Relation (3):</p><p>I p = W L − W p . (3)</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_5"><title>2.2.5. Determination of the Normal Proctor Optimum</title><p>The test was carried out in accordance with standard NF P94-093. The principle consists of weighing the empty Proctor mould, compacting three layers of soil sample in this mould and each layer receives 25 strokes of a 2.5 kg tamper. Then the mould is scraped with a metal ruler to remove the extra soil and weighed again. Finally a sample is taken from the top, middle and bottom of the mould for determination of their water contents.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Physical Characterisation of Rice Straw</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Real Density</title><p>The density is determined indirectly in accordance with standard NF P 94-064. A sample of rice straw is dried in an oven at 105˚C for 24 hours and weighed. The sample is then placed in a container (tare) and impregnated with paraffin oil. The sample is then weighed in the open air when its temperature is closed to ambient temperature and then completed by hydrostatic weighing. The calculation of the density is determined as follows:</p><p>Mass of anhydrous sample (m<sub>S</sub>)</p><p>m S = m ( s + t a ) − m t a (4)</p><p>With m<sub>(s+ta)</sub>: Anhydrous and Tare Weight of sample</p><p>Paraffin mass:</p><p>m p = m ( S + P ) − m P (5)</p><p>With m<sub>(S+P)</sub>: Anhydrous and Paraffin Weight of sample</p><p>Paraffin volum:</p><p>V P = m P ρ P (6)</p><p>Hydrostatic weighing:</p><p>m T = m ( S + P ) 1 − m h ( S + P ) 1 (7)</p><p>With mh<sub>(S+P)</sub>: Humid and Paraffin Weight of sample</p><p>Total Volum:</p><p>V T = m T ρ W (8)</p><p>Sample volume:</p><p>V S = V T − V p (9)</p><p>The density of the sample:</p><p>ρ s = m S V S (10)</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Water Absorption Rate</title><p>Approximately 35 g of rice straw was oven-dried at 105˚C for 48 hours to obtain dry aggregate. The absorption rate of rice straw is calculated according to the formula (11):</p><p>A ( T ) = m T − m S m S (11)</p><p>The oven-dried particles were immersed in water at ambient temperature within times of 5 minutes to 48 hours at ambient temperature.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_3"><title>2.3.3. Material Formulations</title><p>The soil is lightly crushed with a hammer and 5 mm sieves are used to prepare the specimens of dimensions 40 &#215; 40 &#215; 160 mm for three-point bending and 40 &#215; 40 &#215; 40 mm for compression and absorption by capillary action, which are made from local materials using several formulations. The rice straw is first immersed in water until saturation and then added to the soil in a dry state. Then the water is topped up. The dimensions of rice straw used for this work are: (length 1, 2, 3 and 4 cm and diameter 2 to 4 mm) obtained by manual cutting with scissors.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_4"><title>2.3.4. Preparation of the Mixtures</title><p>The samples are dried in the oven at 65˚C for 24 hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref12">12</xref>] (Hay. B, 2002). The rice straw is soaked in water for 1 hour and added to the soil. Then, the whole is mixed with water manually. The mass of the dry mixture to make a 40 &#215; 40 &#215; 160 mm test piece is 400 g and for 40 &#215; 40 &#215; 40 mm test piece is 100 g. The formulations F<sub>j</sub> are obtained from the compositions: F j = B     X A     Y P t</p><p>B: mud brick; XA= percentage X of clay. The unit of X is the percentage (%).</p><p>YPt: Percentage Y of the straw of size t.</p><p>X = { 100 ; 99.5 ; 99 ; 98.5 ; 98 ; 97.5 ; 97 } ;</p><p>Y = { 0 ; 0.5 ; 1 ; 1.5 ; 2 ; 2.5 ; 3 } et t = { 0 ; 1 ; 2 ; 3 ; 4 } .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_5"><title>2.3.5. Preparation of Specimens</title><p>The prepared mixture was placed in a plastic bucket for about 1 hour for good impregnation. Then, the dough was placed by hand in a plastic mold and unmolded just after compacting by hand. After demoulding, the bricks were dried at ambient temperature.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_6"><title>2.3.6. Determination of the Apparent Density of the Test Specimens</title><p>The specimen is weighed after drying in an oven at a temperature of 105˚C to constant mass, M the volume of the specimen, V this volume expressed in m<sup>3</sup>. The average dry density of the test piece is determined by the formula (12) expressed in kg/m<sup>3</sup> according to standard NBN B 24.206.</p><p>ρ = M V (12)</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Determination of Mechanical Characteristics</title><sec id="s2_4_1"><title>2.4.1. Bending Test 03 Points</title><p>The specimen is placed in the characterisation device, which consists of two pistons. An upper piston with a 2.5 KN load cell and a displacement comparator attached. The lower piston rises with the specimen until it comes into contact with the upper piston. The force sensor records the forces exerted on the specimen. A camera films the operation and the video is stored directly in a PC for analysis. The measurement of the bending strength is given by the relation (13) according to the standard (XP 13-901)</p><p>R f = 3 F t m a x ⋅ L 2 ⋅ b ⋅ h 2 (13)</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_2"><title>2.4.2. Compression Test</title><p>A brick sample of 40 &#215; 40 &#215; 40 mm according to standard XP P 13-901 is subjected to compression using the civil engineering press until it breaks. The principle consists of placing the brick sample in the press; applying the load in a continuous manner and at a regular speed until the sample breaks completely and recording the maximum load supported by the sample during the test. The machinery system made of camera and Computer records all the measurements of pressure and displacement of the blocks, it has a maximum capacity of 2.5 KN and a sensor. The compressive strength of the blocks is the arithmetic average of the strengths of eight tests carried out on samples from the same batch. It is given by the formula:</p><p>R c = F S (14)</p><p>R<sub>c</sub>: is the compressive strength of the blocks in mega pascal (MPa); F: is the maximum load supported by the two bricks in kilo newtons (N); S: is the average area of the test faces in square centimetres (mm<sup>2</sup>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_3"><title>2.4.3. Water Absorption by Capillarity</title><p>Water absorption by capillary action was measured by the detailed test according to the experimental standard NF XP 13-901. The principle is to partially immerse the brick at a 5 mm depth. The water absorption coefficient C<sub>b</sub> corresponds to the rate of absorption rate after 10 min. The water absorption coefficient C<sub>b</sub> is expressed by the following formula:</p><p>C b = 100 &#215; m h − m s S t (15)</p><p>m<sub>h</sub> − m<sub>s</sub>: is the mass of water, in grams, absorbed by the block during the test.</p><p>S: area of the submerged face, in square centimeters; t: is the immersion time of the block in minutes.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Physical Characteristics</title><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Natural Water Content of the Clay</title><p>The average natural water content value of the clay is 8.39% compared to that obtained by ABAKAR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref2">2</xref>] which is 10.90%, this clay is less moist.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. Density of Solid Grains</title><p>The density values of solid particles whose size are not more than 2 mm are 2025.73 Kg/m<sup>3</sup> less than the value 2450 Kg/m<sup>3</sup> obtained by ABAKAR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref2">2</xref>], mean this clay contain more void than theirs.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_3"><title>3.1.3. Particle Size Analysis by Sieving</title><p>The analysis was done on a sample of Ms = 361.27 g. The results of these analyses are given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. For the different grain diameters, the soil was analysed by sieve opening between 5.00 mm and 0.08 mm or from sieve 38 to sieve 20. For sieve 38 with a sieve opening of 5 mm, no seeds were retained in the sieve, the cumulative sieving is therefore 100%, whereas for sieve 20 with an opening of 0.08 mm, 18.7% of the dry mass or 114 g was retained, also called cumulative refusal, and 81% of the cumulative sieving is also defined by the part passed through the sieve. From sieve 38 to sieve 20, the rate of cumulative refusal increases little by little contrary to the rate of cumulative sieving which decreases with each sieve. Thus, 81% represents the finer grains in the soil and 18.7% were rejected by the sieve due to their slightly larger size.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_4"><title>3.1.4. Atterberglimit</title><p>➢ Liquiditylimit</p><p>For this material, lip closure is obtained at 17, 19, 27 and 34 strokes and the result is given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. From this diagram, the liquidity limit is deduced. It is worth 47.66% at 25 strokes.</p><p>➢ Plasticitylimit</p><p>The average plasticity limit value is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The average plastic limit is 29.75%. From these measurements, it appears that this material is</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The average plasticity limit value</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plaque</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tares (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tare + Mh (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tare + Ms (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mw (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >W (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >W<sub>average</sub> (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Plastic limit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >29.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.95</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>an organic silt that is not very plastic. This rough classification is frequently used in the road sector (NF P11-300, 1992) and ensures that soils are not susceptible to significant dimensional variations in the presence of water. That value corresponds to the water content in the brick as it changes from plastic to semi-solid consistency and as it dries.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_5"><title>3.1.5. Normal Proctor</title><p>After analysis of the Proctor curves of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, we note that the percentage of water in the soil to be compacted was 13.54%. Thus, the maximum dry density of the soil sample is 1.21.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Rice Straw</title><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Real Density of Rice Straw</title><p>The bulk density of rice straw is 464 kg/m<sup>3</sup>. We note that the density lower than that of clay which is 2045 kg/m<sup>3</sup>. This is due to the high porosity.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Water Absorption</title><p>The result of the water absorption of rice straw is summarised in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. We find that the water absorption capacity of rice straw is 206% at 5 min. This is too high compared to most construction materials. After 48 hours of immersion, the two materials reach a relatively close absorption rate. In construction, the hydrophilic character is a major defect. Rice straw must be immersed in water until it is saturated before mixing it with the binder or soil, otherwise it will absorb all the mixing water, thus generating a product that is difficult to use.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Absorption rate of rice straw</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Duration (min)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >30</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >60</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >120</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >150</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >240</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >360</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >480</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1400</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2800</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mass (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absorption (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >263</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >271</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >323</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >329</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >331</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >340</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >348</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Physical and Mechanical Testing of Specimens</title><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. Apparent Densities</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> gives the results of the apparent densities of the specimens. This table shows that for each size, the apparent density decreases as the percentage of fibres increases. These masses are between 1082.57 and 1420.05 Kg/m<sup>3</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. Three-Point Bending Test</title><p>The Figures 5-9 show that the bending strength drops as a function of the straw intake percentage. For adobe without straw, the maximum strength is 1.52 MPa. For straw of 1cm length (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), the resistance is 1.04 MPa at 1% straw, 0.97 MPa at 0.5% straw to finish at 0.63 MPa with 3% straw while passing through the other percentages (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Strength drops from 0.90 MPa at 0.5% straw to 0.42 MPa with 3% straw with a slight increase to 2.5% straw. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> has a resistance which varies between 0.61 and 0.73 MPa and that of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> varies between 0.57 and 0.84 MPa. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> gives the maximum resistance of each size. Apart from the simple clay formulation, the maximum strength is 1.04 MPa corresponding to the B99%A-1%P1 formulation (adobe made up of 99% clay and 1% straw of 1 cm size). This resistance is beyond the minimum resistance underlined by Doat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref13">13</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_3"><title>3.3.2. Compression Test</title><p>The compression results are synthetized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0-14. The compressive strength drops. The maximum compression strength of Simple clay adobes is</p><p>0.19 MPa, that made with 1cm straws long is 0.16 MPa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0). The compression strengths of the bricks using straw of size 2, 3 and 4 cm are respectively 0.14 MPa; 0.2 MPa and 0.14 MPa (Figures 11-13). These characteristics allow us to conclude that the brick can be used to build houses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116861-ref12">12</xref>]. The brick B98.5A1.5P3 made with 1.5% of 3 cm straw has maximum compression strength (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4). The adobe brick reinforced with rice straw absorbs a lot of water when the percentage of straw is high (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5). The absorption coefficient is 4.875% at 0% straw and 20.57% at 3% straw. This can also be explained by the void left by the straw in the adobe (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6). The pores existing within the matrix of the brick influence the absorption of water by capillarity action and</p><p>absorption rate increases with void rate.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The study of the mud and rice straw from the Pitoa area in the North Cameroon Region and the analysis of the physical and mechanical characteristics of the adobe type Mud bricks reinforced with rice straw presented quite interesting results. The water content of the mud is 8.39%. The liquidity and plasticity limits are respectively 47.66% and 29.75%, which gives a plasticity index of 17.91%. Thus, for this study we selected the formulation B98.5%A-1.5%P3 (adobe made of 98.5% clay and 1.5% straw of size 3 cm) for the construction of the habitat in this locality. As perspective, a comparative analysis between these bricks and those made from the biohardeners will be done.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Makomra, V., Tapsia, L.K., Ndiwe, B., Kaoutoing, M.D., Konai, N., Njom, A., Laynde, T. and Raidandi, D. (2022) Physico-Mechanical Properties of Bio-Based Bricks. Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, 10, 16-29. https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2022.104002</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.116861-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Houben, H. and Guillaud, H. (2006) Traité de construction en terre,Centre de recherche et d’application pour la construction en terre. EAN13; 9782863641613, ISBN 978-2-86364-161-3, Ed. Parenthèse, Marseille, Collection: L'Encyclopédie de la construction en terre, 360 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116861-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abakar, A. (2018) Caractérisations mécanique et thermique de l’argile stabilisée par la gomme arabique et renforcée par la paille de riz. PhD thèse, Université de Lorraine, France. https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/tel-01920664</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116861-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Djouhri, M. (2007) Confection d’une brique à base de sable de dunes mémoire de. Master’s Thesis, Université KASDI Merbah de Ouargla, Algeri.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116861-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malanda, N., Louzolo-Kimbembe, P. and Tamba-Nsemi, Y.D. (2017) Etude des caractéristiques mécaniques d’une brique en terre stabilisée à l’aide de la mélasse de canne à sucre. Revue RAMReS—Sciences Appliquées et de l'Ingénieur, 2, 1-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116861-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laibi, B. (2017) Comportement hygro-thermo-mécanique de matériaux structuraux pour la construction associant des fibres de kénaf à des terres argileuses. Chimie Inorganique. PhD Thesis, Normandie Université; Université d’Abomey-Calavi, Bénin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116861-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Fgaier, F. (2013) Conception, production et qualification des briques en terre cuite et en terre crue. Thèse de doctorat, Ecole centrale de Lille. https://tel.archivesouvertes.fr</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116861-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Phung, P.A. (2018) Formulation et caractérisation d’un composite terre-fibres végétales: la bauge. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Caen Normandie, Caen, 179 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116861-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Areso (2018). Guide des bonnes pratiques de la construction en terre crue.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116861-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mejdoub, A., Bois, C., El Yagoubi, J., Lorriot, T. And Wargnier, H. (2019) Analyse par dialogue essai calcul d’un essai de flexion 4 points sur éprouvette sandwich pour la caractérisationen compression de composites à fibres longues. 21ème Journées Nationales sur les Composites, école Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers (ENSAM)—BordeauxTalence, France.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116861-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atlan, Y. (1978) Catalogues des essais géotechniques exécutés au laboratoire géotechnique d’Orléans. 78 SGN 178 GEG, 240-270.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116861-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hejazi, S.M., Sheikhzadeh, M., Abtahi, S.M. and Zadhoush, A. (2012) A Simple Review of Soil Reinforcement by Using Natural and Synthetic Fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 30, 100-116.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116861-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hay, B., Filtz, J.R. and Batsale, J.Ch. (2004) Mesure de la diffusivité thermique par la méthode flash. Techniques de l’Ingénieur, R2955, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.51257/a-v1-r2955</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116861-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doat, P., Hays, A., Houben, H., Matuk, S. and Vitoux, F. (1979) Construire en terre. Editions Alternatives et parallèles, Paris, 265 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>