<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JTTs</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Transportation Technologies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-0473</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jtts.2022.122016</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JTTs-116805</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Gap Analysis between Women Passengers’ Perception and Expectations about Bus Service: A Case Study on Bangladesh
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ayesha</surname><given-names>Umme</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kojima</surname><given-names>Aya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kubota</surname><given-names>Hisashi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Japan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>258</fpage><lpage>285</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Since public bus service is frequently available and reasonably priced in major cities of Bangladesh including Dhaka, the capital city, a significant number of economically active women regularly commute to work utilizing public buses. Since female commuters experience unique challenges compared to their male counterparts, a gap analysis on the perception of men and women, as well as the difference between the female commuters’ perceptions and expectations, could help to pinpoint the issues. The aim of this paper is to determine the gap between female commuters’ perceptions and expectations of bus service quality in Bangladesh, as well as the current perception 
  of both male and female passengers. In this paper, the data obtained is studied to determine the service quality needs which should be improved by analyzing the perception and expectation gaps for female passengers. SERVQUAL models were used to examine the disparities between perceptions and aspirations in Bangladesh’s major cities. Tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy are the five dimensions of SERVQUAL. The data for this study was collected from 1500 commuters in Bangladesh’s largest cities, including Dhaka, Gazipur, and Narayanganj. Primary data was gathered using a purpose-built questionnaire survey. The Gap values are negative in all dimensions, according to the findings of the study. In the data analysis, a negative gap value indicates that the expectation exceeds the perception. According to the gap analysis, the quality of bus service for passengers is insufficient. Bus service quality is seen and expected to be quite varied. It is vital to improve bus service to meet the needs of women. The findings could be valuable in planning future transportation policies that take female commuters’ needs into account.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Public Bus</kwd><kwd> Public Transport</kwd><kwd> Women Commuters</kwd><kwd> Service Quality</kwd><kwd> SERVQUAL</kwd><kwd> Bangladesh</kwd><kwd> Perceptions</kwd><kwd> Expectations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Dhaka is one of the fastest growing and highly dense cities in the world and the city holds a population of about 12 million people within its 1529 sq∙km land area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref1">1</xref>]. People migrate to Dhaka from various parts of Bangladesh in search of a better life, education, work, etc. Rural-urban migration contributes to this high population growth in Dhaka [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref2">2</xref>]. Unlike most other cities in Asia, the male to female ratio in Dhaka is around 1:1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref2">2</xref>]. Being the main commercial hub of Bangladesh, Dhaka is the hub of employment opportunities and all essential amenities, such as health, education, etc. In densely populated metropolitan areas, public transport (PT) is the most efficient means of transportation for meeting travel demands. People in cities must move on a regular basis to participate in economic activities, which enables the formation of social networks and makes family life easier. PT is the vein of any nation, because it permits the free movement of people, goods, and information, thereby allowing progress on the most efficient deployment of economic resources. In other words, PT has a direct impact on any nation’s economic progress. Public transportation has the potential to reduce the number of private vehicles in cities while simultaneously providing mobility to an enormous number of people who do not own any car and cannot afford to pay the ever-changing paratransit or taxi fares [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref3">3</xref>]. Globalization, motorization, urbanization, and socio-demographic shifts have had a significant impact on the transportation of both men and women globally. For the past two decades, policymakers and transportation planners have focused on gender issues in the public transportation sector, recognizing the differences in the travel modes and transportation routes and the related pattern of activities for both men and women globally [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>The issue of women empowerment is positively gaining traction around the world as more women join the workforce, hence contributing positively to the economic progress of their nation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref6">6</xref>]. Although this has made a great impact, their mobility and access to their workplace are becoming a challenging requirement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref6">6</xref>]. As a result of the increasing female workforce, more travel times have to be met and higher demand for PT. Also, in both developing and developed nations where women have substantially less freedom than males, they make remarkable impact on the economy. They generate a significant number of journeys on a regular basis. Also, due to a greater variety of social classes, cultural backgrounds, and economic situations in the urban context of developing countries, travel patterns between male and female members of the same household are different [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref5">5</xref>]. Since most working women are low-wage earners, they do not have the financial means to pay for private or shared transportation. Therefore, public bus service is more convenient because it is more economical and cost-effective for commuters. Nowadays, the public bus service demand is increasing rapidly with the increase of female commuters. Researchers also have been studying the relationship between the quality of transport services and people’s accessibility in recent decades [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref7">7</xref>]. Several studies on the quality of public bus services have been undertaken, but none have taken gender into account [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref9">9</xref>]. Most of the existing research focused on the service quality of public bus service in Bangladesh in terms of perception, expectations, and passengers’ satisfaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref11">11</xref>]. However, there is less research on the quality of public bus services that consider gender issues in developing countries like Bangladesh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref5">5</xref>]. In addition, the effects of society and culture in developing nations like Bangladesh, quite differ on the travel patterns of both the male and female commuters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref13">13</xref>]. Female commuters must relocate to gain access to services and job possibilities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref14">14</xref>]. Therefore, the female passenger’s safety, security, comfort level, reserved seat, boarding, alighting facilities, handicap facilities, accessibility of bus, etc., are the more important factors while traveling in public bus service. Using Bangladesh as a case study, it was observed that very few previous studies on bus service considered these issues regarding female commuters, hence the need for this study.</p><p>The aim of this research is to determine the level of perception of men and women commuters about public bus service and measure the gap between the expectations and perception of women commuters. From the analyzed gap value, the authors made some decisions about the improvement of the level of service quality of the bus according to the female commuter’s expectation. Also, the discussions on the findings were made on the attributes which significantly influenced the service quality of buses regarding the women passengers. This paper is structured with an introduction in Section 1, and a literature review to stress the research need with the unique contribution of this study is undertaken in Section 2. The data collection is presented in Section 3. Following that, the research approach is comprehensively presented in Section 4, while the methodology is presented in Section 5. The study’s findings are then presented and discussed in Section 6, and finally used to draw conclusions in Section 7. Also, the policy ramifications are examined as some recommendations and action plans were presented.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Literature Review</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Gender Issues in Public Transport Services</title><p>Most women in Bangladesh are active in social-cultural, economic, and political activities for which they need PT to meet up their daily necessities. However, the employed population has a significant discrepancy concerning gender. Even though both men and women are contributing to the country’s economic development, there is serious inequity in the availability of efficient and safe transport for female commuters. Women are more dependent on PT than men, especially when they are lower income. The bus is the only mode of mass public transit available in Dhaka City for middle-income and low-income classes. In recent years, the number of female commuters is increasing rapidly for education, jobs, business, etc. Therefore, the public bus service quality is an important issue for the passengers, especially female passengers. The dwellers of Dhaka city faced various problems related to transportation in their day-to-day life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref15">15</xref>]. A substantial part of this population, 49.4%, is women. According to the 2018 UNESCO report (Bangladesh’s literacy rate rises; https://countryeconomy.com/demography/literacy-rate/bangladesh) the female literacy rate of Bangladesh is 71.18%. Unfortunately, Bangladeshi women had to deal with a variety of transportation issues. However, there is a paucity of studies on women’s transportation pleasure, with most female passengers opting for public transit due to its accessibility and affordability. There have been some studies on the quality of public bus service and passenger satisfaction, with the majority of respondents being male or male and female. According to prior research, the environment of bus service is quite inadequate and barely meets the needs of passengers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p>Passengers are unsatisfied for three reasons: unsafe driving, improper boarding and alighting, and lack of law enforcement surveillance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref16">16</xref>], several studies, including the one by Rouf et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref14">14</xref>], have focused on the safety of female riders on public buses. On public buses, they are harassed by male passengers or by the crew. Transportation planning does not take gender into account [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref5">5</xref>]. Other than the risk of accident and sexual harassment, according to K.A. Rouf et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref14">14</xref>], safety is the most critical problem for female passengers riding the public bus. According to the existing research, the passengers of public buses face some difficulty to travel, especially women commuters like harassment, poor boarding, and alighting facilities, etc. M.S. Rahman et al. 2012 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref17">17</xref>] are also worth mentioning. Passenger’s boarding the bus have been waiting for an unknown amount of time, with no indication of when the bus will arrive. According to prior research, female passengers face serious issues such as safety, security, and bus personnel behavior. Because of distinct economic and cultural duties, obligations, and activities in the issue of gender inequality, men and women have varied travel patterns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref18">18</xref>]. Because of their dual obligations, they travel more frequently than working men to perform various household tasks such as childcare and transporting parents to doctors or health care facilities, shopping, visiting relatives, and so on [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref20">20</xref>]. In developing countries, women have less access to private motorized vehicles than men due to societal norms about women’s appropriate travel behavior [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref19">19</xref>]; women are more concerned about their safety issues while using public transportation than men. Tarigan et al., 2010 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref21">21</xref>], women are frequently targets of sexual harassment when walking or using public transportation, according to Anand &amp; Tiwari, 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref20">20</xref>], and this scenario may be exacerbated by low lighting and small lonely routes connecting homes to bus stations. M.S. Rahman et al. 2012 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref17">17</xref>] while commuting in Dhaka City’s public transportation, women suffer a variety of physical harassment and issues. In most cases, women in public transportation are unable to protect themselves against physical touching and other forms of abuse. They are restless and insecure in the majority of Dhaka City’s public transportation facilities. On the other hand, male travellers have never had such a problem with public transportation. As a result, the most pressing topic for further inquiry is the perception of women passengers and what is the expectation level of public bus service. Since female passengers face problems while traveling public buses, so the mitigation of these problems is essential.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. SERVAQUAL</title><p>SERVQUAL could be a multidimensional research instrument designed to capture consumer expectations and perceptions of a service along five dimensions that are believed to represent service quality. SERVQUAL is made on the expectancy-disconfirmation paradigm, which, in simple terms, implies that service quality is known because of the extent to which consumers’ perception expectations of quality are confirmed or disconfirmed by passengers’ actual perceptions of the service experience. When the SERVQUAL questionnaire was first published in 1985 by a team of educational researchers, to live quality within the service sector. In most cases, the authors tweaked these models to suit their study context. The subsequent may be a summary of varied research findings. Mikhaylov et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref22">22</xref>] presented one of the foremost, widely used and scientifically recognized methods of measuring service quality within the service sector, including the general public transportation industry, called the SERVQUAL (i.e. Service Quality) instruments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref25">25</xref>] described SERVQUAL dimensions—tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy, as “a basic skeleton underlying service quality” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref25">25</xref>]. The SERVQUAL, being a humanistic and customer-centric measurement instrument, is qualitatively different from the mechanistic, technical, and objective measures commonly utilized in the general PT industry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref23">23</xref>]. Using SERVQUAL instrument enables the researchers to spot additionally measure the weather of customers’ expectations in such some way that a condition and views a few services are often captured, analyzed, and understood.</p><p>The SERVQUAL paradigm was used in the [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref26">26</xref>] study, which included five criteria: service, access, availability, time, and environment. They discovered that the service dimension had an impact on customer service using the multiple regression method. In a case study with a national highway passenger transportation firm in Europe, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref27">27</xref>] employed the SERVQUAL scale, which includes qualities like tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. Customers demand knowledgeable and compassionate staff, error-free services, and technological transportation specifications, according to the authors’ analysis. By using Quality Function Deployment, this study offered various enhancements to the quality of highway passenger transportation services. To design a quality evaluation tool for transport operators to validate the offered service, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref28">28</xref>] used a customized variant of the SERVQUAL technique that complied with a European standard on service quality in public transportation. The survey took done in the Italian city of Cagliari, and it indicated that on-board security, bus reliability, cleanliness, and regularity are all highly valued qualities of public transportation. Mikhaylov et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref22">22</xref>] evaluate the quality of public transportation from the customer perspective, in the form of a unified SERVQUAL survey mode, and capture the personality traits, cultural peculiarities, and contextual factors that may influence customers’ perception of quality.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Research Hypotheses</title><p>A p-value is used in hypothesis testing to help support or reject the null hypothesis. The p value is the evidence against a null hypothesis. The smaller the p-value, the stronger the evidence that you should reject the null hypothesis. The significant level of p-value is 1%, 5% and 10% and also consider less than 1% is highly significant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref30">30</xref>].</p><p>In this research, a SERVAQUAL model was used to analysis the collected data. The SERVAQUAL model is consist of five dimensions which is tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> which is explained briefly in the 6.2 section.</p><p>H1: Hypothesis (H1) revealed that there is a significant gap in female passengers’ and male passengers’ perceptions of bus service quality in Bangladesh. It also showed the possibility of also realizing the opposite genders’ perception about the bus service in Bangladesh. This hypothesis predicts that some similarity or dissimilarity of perception by both the males and female passengers on the bus service quality may arise under different attributes.</p><p>The p-values of most of the dimensions are lower than 0.01, which is the proposed alternative hypothesis is accepted, meaning that there is a significant difference between female and male passengers’ perception of bus service quality in Bangladesh. The results of this study are like to the existing study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref31">31</xref>] and concluded that there is a significant difference between male and female passengers’ satisfaction levels regarding bus service quality. The reasons behind these are variations in travel pattern [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref15">15</xref>] and safety &amp; security [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref32">32</xref>].</p><p>H2: The second hypothesis is that there is a large disparity in the perceptions and expectations of female bus passengers on bus service quality in Bangladesh. The outcomes of the study are more important and more significant than the gap in alternative hypothesis between perceptions and expectations. From the gap analysis, it would be possible to predict the best attribute that would be improved, by either increasing or reducing the attributive factors.</p><p>The results of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> showed that the p-values of all dimensions are lower than 0.01 that is the proposed alternative hypothesis is accepted meaning that there is a significant difference between women Passengers’ Perceptions and expectations about the Bus Service quality in Bangladesh. The results of this study are like the previous study of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref34">34</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Data Collection</title><p>In Dhaka city, the specific locations were selected where generated more trips by</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Variables used in the present study</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factors</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >symbol of attributes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statements</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Tangibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The bus stand is attractive.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bus service providers have up-to-date technology.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The bus stand has sufficient resources as well as capacity.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bus service providers have a professional appearance.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The bus staffs are smart and wear neat and clean dresses.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Reliability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The bus always arrives at the destination within a convenient time.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The bus breaks down on the road unnecessarily and wastes time</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The prevailing ticket booking system is convenient for passengers.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Staffs always meet the passengers’ requirements right the first time.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bus service providers insist on error-free service.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Responsiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RP1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bus staffs always inform passengers of the exact timetable and fees.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RP2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bus service providers provide timely and efficient service.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RP3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good communication always exists between passengers and staff.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RP4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bus staffs are always willing to co-operate passengers.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RP5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bus service providers are always ready to respond to requests.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Assurance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Passengers feel safe in dealing with transactions at the ticket counters.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Passengers feel secure when dealing with transactions with staff.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bus staffs are always polite.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bus staffs have enough knowledge about their jobs.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bus staffs inspire passengers to develop their confidence.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Empathy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Staffs always concentrate on the best interests of their passengers.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Service hours are convenient to the bus passengers.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Passengers get information about bus services easily.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bus passengers find and access the bus stand easily.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bus staffs always give individual attention to each passenger.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Differences between female and male passengers’ perceptions about bus service in Bangladesh</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Factors</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Statements</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Perception (Average)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Difference</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Tangibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.137</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Reliability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Responsiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RP1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RP2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RP3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RP4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RP5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Assurance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Empathy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.472</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.089</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>bus than other locations like Farmgate, Mohammadpur, Motijhil, Shahbagh, Kallayanpur, Dhanmondi, Mohakhali, Green Road, and Mirpur. In this study, the sample size was restricted to 1500 (male respondents-750 and female respondents-750) and a hypothesis was required for this sample data. Twenty-five questions were used to assess expectations and perceptions. The questionnaires were divided into three parts. The first part of the questionnaire consisted of eight demographic information. The second part was designed to measure the respondent’s perceptions regarding service quality provided by public bus service. The third part of the questionnaire was designed to measure the respondent’s expectations of service quality. It was observed that both male and female passengers faced similar challenges on PT. These challenges experienced on public buses include sexual harassment, particularly physical touching, and verbal abuses. However, these challenges are considered a greater problem for female passengers compared to male passengers. In Bangladesh, a large number of female passengers travel together in the bus with men, such as husband and wife, father and daughter, mother and son, brethren and sisters. In this case, the problems of female passengers (which are not faced by men) are similar to the perceptions of men in terms of whether they are actually perceived by women or not. However, there is a challenge towards understanding how women perceive the problems faced by men in PT. These men related-PT problems include the control of men, standing up for women that are harassed in public and defending the honour of women in PT. Hence, some men take pride in their masculinity by being men of integrity and honour in that regard. Contrarily, there may be some similarities with the female’s perceptions of men as gathered in this study. A female respondent took her time to treat or perceive herself as a male respondent and at another time she perceived herself as a female respondent. Also on the same case, a male respondent took his time to treat or perceive himself as a female respondent and at another time treated as a male respondent.</p><p>In this study, the five-point Likert scale is the most widely used form of scaled items where the respondent chooses a point on a scale that best represents his/her view. Scoring for the scale was as follows: 1) highly agreed, 2) agreed, 3) neutral, 4) disagreed, and 5) highly disagreed. By comparing each value difference between all 25 expectations and perceptions, the level of quality can be concluded by SQ = P − E, where P and E are perception and expectation respectively. If the perceived value is higher than the expected value, it can be concluded that the service is satisfactory or ideal. However, if the expected value is higher than the perceived value, the service quality level can be regarded as unsatisfactory or even unacceptable.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Methodology</title><p>The service quality was assessed using the SERVQUAL instrument [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref35">35</xref>]. The instrument is widely applied by numerous studies to assess service quality in several fields [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref36">36</xref>]. To be able to SERVAQUAL instrument measuring the service quality of public bus service and the passenger’s perception and expectation in Bangladesh, we developed a questioner formwork according to SERVAQUAL model, where the SERVAQUAL dimension is tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. Tangibles are defined as the appearance of physical facilities, equipment, personnel, and communication materials. Reliability simply refers to the ability of the service provider to perform the promised service dependably and accurately. Assurance, which is referred to the knowledge, courtesy, skills, and trustworthiness of the employees, as well as freedom from danger, risk, or doubt. It also includes the ability of the employee to convey trust and confidence. Responsiveness is expressed as the willingness of the service provider to help customers, i.e., passengers and to provide prompt service. An empathy that deals with the caring and individualized attention that the bus service provides for passengers.</p><p>According to the handling of the SERVAQUAL dimension, 25 questions were developed and categorized as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. According to Mikhaylov et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref22">22</xref>] respondents were offered to evaluate questions on a scale from 1—strongly agree to 5—strongly disagree. Additional questions asked were related to demographic information are essential in connecting to the evaluation of service quality.</p><p>To determine the sample size of the popularly we have adopted the following equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref37">37</xref>]</p><p>Sample   Size = 2500 ∗ N ∗ ( 1.96 ) 2 / [ 25 ∗ ( N − 1 ) + 2500 ∗ ( 1.96 ) 2 ] (1)</p><p>where N is Total Population of the desired study area (N = 24,950,381 person).</p><p>Confidence coefficient: Z-score = (1.96) for 95% confidence level.</p><p>The desired sample size is 385 persons, which is below the entire 1500 respondents who participated in this survey. The respondents are current users and customers of the general public bus companies based within the city, which is ensured by the respective questions.</p><p>From the response of respondents, it has been able to determine the extent of perceived service quality in each dimension and a private item and their expectations of the SERVQUAL model. This enabled the authors to spot and distinguish areas of the service process that are looked as if it would be the most important bottleneck of the service quality. The difference between the service performance (i.e., perceived quality) and therefore the highest possible rating of a service (customers’ expectations) is that the number of quality improvements the customer still expects from the corporate particular areas of service. According to the dealing of SERVAQUAL dimension, 25 questions were developed and categorized as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. In step with Mikhaylov et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116805-ref22">22</xref>] respondents were offered to judge questions on the dimensions from 1—strongly agree to five—strongly disagree. Additional questions asked to relate to demographic information are essential in connecting to the evaluation of service quality. To analyze the gap between women passengers’ perceptions and expectations about bus service quality in Bangladesh, the following variables have been used (shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) by reviewing the previous related literature. Each dimension has five attributes which are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Results and Discussions</title><sec id="s6_1"><title>6.1. Demographic Analysis</title><p>Demographic survey data of respondents is that such as gender, age, and education background are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> where the equal percentage of male and female, approximate 63% respondents age in between 20 - 30 and 57.07% respondents are graduates. One thousand and five hundred respondents participated</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Demographic information of respond</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Classes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Respondent’s Age ((Years))</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 to 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >437</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.13%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 to 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >943</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.87%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 to 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.33%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 t0 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 to 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Educational Background</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Below SSC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.33%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SSC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.27%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HSC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >385</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.67%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Graduate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >856</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.07%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Postgraduate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total=</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Students</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >655</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.67%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Service holder</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >790</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.67%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Businessmen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.07%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >The main mode chosen by respondents</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1458</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.20%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rickshaw</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Para Transit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Motor/Bicycle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Car</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>in this research work. The respondents were consisting of students, service holders, businessmen, and others, where 43.67% are students and 52.67% are service holders (as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Within 1500 sample sizes comprised of 750 males and 750 females, the data on the passengers’ perceptions for both genders are represented in Figures 1-25. These data were obtained from the respondents using the questionnaire of the survey. The female passengers consider their problems due to bus service quality only as their own problems or do they consider those problems as problems of male passengers and the same and opposite for male passengers.</p><p>Both male and female passengers are equally transported on public buses. Male and female passengers on public transportation may have similar or dissimilar feelings and perceptions about bus service quality. In this research, there is the</p><p>consideration that a male passenger acts as both a female and a male passenger simultaneously. This assumption is taken to ascertain the opposite gender’s perceptions of the bus service’s quality, for example, whether a female passenger’s perceptions are identical to those of a male passenger or not. The same situation also holds true for a male passenger. If a male passenger is only concerned with his own opinion of the bus service’s quality, he will, in opinion, respond only to the opinions of other male passengers. However, if an interview is conducted with a male subject in which he acts as both a man and a woman, he will have the opportunity to consider the situation from both a male and female passenger’s perspective simultaneously. Likewise, female travelers face the same challenges. Hence the decision to accept male passengers who responded as females and men, as well as male passengers who responded as males and females.</p><p>This respondent’s duo pass is also justified in this research by the use of the same questionnaire whereby a male person who plays a role as a male passenger, at a time also acts as a female. That is also the same case but opposite for female passengers. A female person’s perception almost disagrees when playing a role as a female passenger and the same person acting as a male the perception has almost disagreed. That means the female considers the bus service quality problem which attributes faced by female passengers that also are a problem for male passengers except for the attribute of “sufficient seats at the bus stand for passengers”, “bus staffs are willing to co-operate with old and handicapped passengers”, “feel safe in dealing transactions with the bus service provider in the bus stand”, “feel secure when dealing transaction with staff inside the bus”. The same case is for a male person, who acts as a male and at a time acts like a female. Here the all-female and male passengers’ perceptions are disagreed according to all variants of this survey shown in Figures 1-25 (except <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig14">Figure 14</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig16">Figure 16</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig17">Figure 17</xref>). Like the variant “the bus stand is attractive” when a female acts as a female passenger the perception is 60.4% and when she acts as a male the perception is 60.93% that’s almost the same. Again, for the same variant a male person acting as a male passenger the perception is 78.3% and when he is acting as female the perception is 79.5%, and so on. That’s also the same result. In another variant remains the same scenario. However, the four variants (“sufficient seats at the bus stand for passengers”, “bus staffs are willing to co-operate with old and handicapped passengers”, “feel safe in dealing transactions with the bus service provider in the bus stand”, “feel secure when dealing the transaction with staff inside the bus”) different scenarios. In the case of the attribute “sufficient seat at the bus stand for passengers”, 56% of female passenger’s responded as disagreeing when responding as a female, and when acting as a male 42% responded as disagreed but having a difference in male passengers, 64.4 % male passenger neutral, and when acting as a female 54.93% responded as highly disagreed (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The passenger’s response about the perception of service quality attribute “bus staffs are willing to co-operate with old and handicapped passengers” is that the female passenger as a female respondent 36.4% response disagreed but when she acts as a male passenger, 36.27% respondents responded as agreed. For the male passengers in both situations, the respondents that agreed as a male passenger were 77.6% while the respondents that agreed as female were 79.07%, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig14">Figure 14</xref>.</p><p>Regarding the safety at the bus stand of passengers while a transaction with service providers, 46% of male passengers responded as disagreeing and 33.33% responded as highly disagreed while acting as a female passenger and 44.93% disagreed and 37.60% neutral while a male passenger response with a male respondent. For the same service feature, 46% of female passengers responded as disagreeing and 28.80% responded as agreed while responding as a female passenger and 42.67% disagreed and 30.93% agreed while male passengers responded male respondents shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig16">Figure 16</xref>. The service quality attribute of “feeling secured when dealing transactions with staff inside the bus”, 53.47% of male passengers responded disagreeing and 27.20% responded as highly disagreed while acting as a female passenger and 41.60% disagreed and 44.00% neutral while a male passenger responded with a male respondent. In addition, 41.73% of female passengers responded as disagreeing and 26.53% responded agreed while responding as a female passenger and 45% disagreed and 27.33% agreed while male passengers responded male respondents as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig17">Figure 17</xref>. This implies that the precipitation gap analysis of male and female passengers regarding the bus service quality supports the first hypothesis (H1).</p></sec><sec id="s6_2"><title>6.2. Gap Analysis between Female and Male Passengers’ Perception about Bus Service Quality in Bangladesh</title><p>This hypothesis was examined by a t-test and a significant value was found (p = 0.000, two-tailed). The results demonstrate that significant differences in passengers’ perceptions and expectations of public bus service are found. In this study, the p-values (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) of the dimensions of service quality except for E4, E5, T2, R3 are lower than 0.01 (1% significance level). Therefore, the t-test (hypothesis) is accepted meaning that there is a significant difference between female and male passengers’ perception about bus service quality in Bangladesh.</p><p>The gap analysis has been conducted based on the women commuters’ demographic characteristics. The results showed that the expected gap score is lower than the perceived gap score, and all p values are lower than 0.01 meaning that there is also a significant difference between passengers’ expectations and perception based on their demographic profile.</p><p>This section is related to the discussion of findings of the present study in the light of the hypotheses already formulated. The following results were found from analyzing the collected data using different tools applied to the present study.</p><p>Analyze the gap of perception and expectation of female passengers according to tangibility. There were five attributes and each attribute was denoted by T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 as per <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The average expectation value on this dimension is 3.484 that is very high. Many female passengers complain about the up-to-date technology, sufficient resources as well as capacity, professional appearance, and cleanliness of the bus, as well as the appearance of the staff, resulting in the average value of perception with only 2.39. The gap of tangible T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 is 0.24, −1.63, −1.55, −1.2, and −1.33 which are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig26">Figure 26</xref>. Here all attributes of the tangibility dimension represent the minus value except the attribute T1 (The bus stand is attractive). Therefore, improvement is to be required.</p><p>Represent the gap of perception and expectation of female passengers according to the dimension of reliability, which is denoted with the attributes as R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5. As per <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the average value expectation of reliability is 3.6 and the perception value 2.42. The expectation value is higher than perception. The gap of perception and expectation in reliability R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 is −1.61, −1.54, −0.85, −0.84, and −1.06 respectively. All attributes of reliability of bus service perception and expectation’s gap represent negative values shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig27">Figure 27</xref>. That means the female passenger expectations are high about bus services in Dhaka city.</p><p>Responsiveness is the most important dimension to exhibit the expectations and perception of female passengers and analyze the gap. The average expectation of responsiveness is 3.09 and the perception value 2.81. The expatiation value is higher than perception. The gap of perception and expectation in responsiveness RP1, RP2, RP3, RP4, and RP5 is −1.48, −1.28, 1.31, 0.72, and −0.67 respectively. All attributes of responsiveness of bus service perception and expectation’s gap represent negative values which are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig28">Figure 28</xref> except RP3 (Good communication always exists between passengers and staff.) and RP4 (Bus staffs are always willing to co-operate passengers.) That means the female passenger expectations are high about bus services in Dhaka city.</p><p>The dimension of assurance, which is denoted the attributes as A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5. The average value expectation of assurance is 3.49 and the perception value 2.42. The expectation value is higher than perception. The gap of perception and expectation in assurance A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5 is −1.21, −0.82, −0.87, −1.39, and −1.05 respectively. All attributes of assurance of bus service perception and expectation’s gap represent negative values shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig29">Figure 29</xref>. That means the female passenger expectations are high about bus services in Dhaka city.</p><p>The dimension of Empathy is denoted by the attributes as E1, E2, E3, E4, and E5. The average value expectation of empathy is 3.73 and the perception value 2.40. The expectation value is higher than perception. The gap of perception and expectation in Empathy E1, E2, E3, E4 and E5 is −1.39, −1.18, −1.42, −1.23 and −1.4 respectively. The present cases also have the same scenario on the gap of perception and expectation which shows the negative values seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>0.</p><p>This implies that the results of the gap analysis between perception and expectation of female passengers support the hypothesis (H2). However, there are some recommended improvements to be required, presented in Section 7.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusions</title><p>Customer happiness is crucial nowadays, as it authenticates and confirms any service’s success. The current study investigated the perception of male and female passengers for the service quality attribute of bus service with both thinking’s of male and female and investigated the difference between current service quality and expected service quality to improve bus service quality. A gap analysis of female passengers’ perceptions and expectations was conducted using SERVQUAL questionnaires. The gap was depicted using five dimensions: reliability, tangibility, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. Using the SERVQUAL approach to investigate the gaps was a promising first step toward potential solutions because the researchers felt it was critical to address the difficulties of public transportation specifically for women in Bangladesh urban areas. Analysis of the perception of male and female passengers during this study represents that the service quality of bus service is not fulfilling the passenger’s satisfaction. The service quality problem, which attributes faced by female passengers and they think that is also a problem for male passengers as well as which problems are faced by male passengers and they also feel that is also a difficulty for female passengers while traveling in the public bus except for a few attributes like female passenger safety and security. In the requirement of sufficient seats at the bus stand, female passengers say it is essential for females and the same person when acting as a male, the response is the same but the male passengers are neutral here, and when he is acting as a female, the sufficient seat is more essential in the bus stand that means it is more essential for female passengers than male.</p><p>In the service quality feature “bus staffs are willing to co-operate with old and handicapped passengers” the male passengers are almost satisfied when he responded as both female and male characters, but the female passengers in both playing roles say this is a poor condition in public bus service quality. In this case, the willingness to co-operate with old and handicapped passengers’ facilities should be improved. About the bus safety and security in dealing transactions with bus service providers in the bus stand and inside the bus female passengers feel that mostly insecure and unsafe for both male and female but the male passengers think, that it is more unsafe and insecure for female than male passengers. Therefore, safety and security are more important for female passengers than males. All other attributes of service quality features are more essential to improve for both males and females.</p><p>In this study, the bulk of the dimension gap value is negative. In this situation, all dimension gap lines are below zero level. When the gap value is negative, it indicates that the expectation exceeds the perception. According to this survey, female passengers’ perceptions are quite low because of the issues. From the findings, the bus’s passenger service is substandard in Bangladesh. Both the perceived and expected quality of bus service were vastly different. Given that poor service quality in one area leads to negative opinions in others, gaps should be bridged by implementing appropriate solutions based on the passengers’ goals. As a result, the bus system should be updated to accommodate women’s requirements. The findings indicate that the assessment offers numerous potential benefits for the service provider. Identifying passengers’ views of service quality performance for a certain attribute (and dimensions) may enable management to better adapt and validate that female commuters’ expectations are met. This entails identifying, prioritizing, and improving areas of service deficiency to guarantee that valuable resources are directed to the most effective locations.</p><p>Due to the data being acquired from primary sources, the findings of this study are reliable and valid. Furthermore, it is best matched to the research’s stated aims. Regulators, service providers, passengers, researchers, and other transportation and environmental agencies are likely to benefit from this study. This information may be valuable to transportation businesses in improving their services and to regulators in developing recommendations and policies. In the future, researchers may conduct similar studies considering other valuable cities in Bangladesh with a larger sample size, allowing for better generalization of findings. Further study is recommended in the variables to be considered in the model as given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> to include distance of the bus stop from home/office, willingness of passengers to use bus service, time elapse between the arrival of two buses at the bus stop, etc.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Umme, A., Aya, K. and Hisashi, K. (2022) Gap Analysis between Women Passengers’ Perception and Expectations about Bus Service: A Case Study on Bangladesh. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 12, 258-285. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2022.122016</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.116805-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahman, D. (2019) Inclusive Urban Transport for Vulnerable Groups: The Case of Dhaka City. Thesis, BRAC Institute of Governance and Development, Bangladesh. http://dspace.bracu.ac.bd/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10361/12742/17262011_MPSM.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shafiq-Ur Rahman</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Bus Service for “Women Only” in Dhaka City: An Investigation</article-title><source> Journal of Bangladesh Institute of Planners</source><volume> 3</volume>,<fpage> 17</fpage>-<lpage>32</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rosenbloom, S. (2006) Understanding Women’s and Men’s Travel Patterns: The Research Challenge. In Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation: Volume 1 Conference Overview and Plenary Papers, Conference Proceedings 35, 7-28. Washington, National Research Council.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nasrin (2015) Acceptability of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) to Commuters in Dhaka. Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peters, D. (1999) Gender Issues in Transportation: A Short Introduction. Presentation Notes for the UNEP Regional Workshop ‘Deals on Wheels: Sustainable Transportation Initiatives in Developing Countries’, San Salvador, 28-30 July 1999, 28-30</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peters, D. (2001) Gender and Transport in Less Developed Countries: A Background Paper in Preparation for CSD-9. UNED Forum, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wallin Andreassen, T. (1995) Dissatisfaction with Public Services: The Case of Public Transportation. Journal of Services Marketing, 9, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049510100290</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eboli, L. and Mazzulla, G. (2007) Service Quality Attributes Affecting Customer Satisfaction for Bus Transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 10, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.10.3.2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bola, N. and Babatunde, I.R. (2013) Differential Effects of Transportation on Male-Female Psychological Distress in Ilorin, Nigeria. Global Journal of Human Social Science Arts, Humanities &amp; Psychology, 13, 27-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mahbubur Rahman, S.M. (2020) Assessing Students’ Satisfaction in Public Universities in Bangladesh: An Empirical Study. Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business, 7, 323-332. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.323</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deb, S. and Ali Ahmed, M. (2018) Determining the Service Quality of the City Bus Service Based on Users’ Perceptions and Expectations, 12, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.02.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pojani, D. and Stead, D. (2015) Sustainable Urban Transport in the Developing World: Beyond Megacities. Sustainability, 7, 7784-7805. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7067784</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riverson, M.K. (2006) Gender Dimensions of Transport in Developing Countries. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1956, 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106195600119</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Munira, S., Sarm, S. and Santoso, D.S. (2013) Perception of Public Van Users in Bangkok. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 10, 1501-1515.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rouf, K., Hossain, D. and Hossain, M. (2019) Female Passengers’ Perception on the Service Quality of Public Bus Services: An Exploratory Study on Dhaka City, Bangladesh. International Journal of Gender Studies in Developing Societies, 3, 99-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640500175615</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahman, F. and Chowdhury, T.D. (2015) Analyzing Customer Satisfaction of Bus Service in Dhaka City. International Conference on Recent Innovation in Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development (IICSD-2015), Gazipur, December 2015, Paper ID: EE-047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahman, M.S. and Nahrin, K (2012) Bus Services in Dhaka City—Users’ Experiences and Opinions. Journal of Bangladesh Institute of Planners, 5, 93-105.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McGukin, N. and Nakamoto, Y. (2005) Differences in Trip Chaining by Men and Women. Conference proceedings, 35, 49-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rosenbloom, S. and Plessis-Fraissard, M. (2009) Women’s Travel in Developed and Developing Countries: Two Versions of the Same Story? Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings, 46, 63-77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anand, A. and Tiwari, G. (2006) A Gendered Perspective of the Shelter-Transport-Livelihood Link: The Case of Poor Women in Delhi. Transport Reviews, 26, 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640500175615</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tarigan, A.K.M., Susilo, Y.O. and Joewono, T.B. (2010) Negative Experiences and Willingness to Use Paratransit in Bandung, Indonesia: An Exploration with Ordered Probit Model. Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting. Washington DC, 10-14 Janunary 2010, 1-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mikhaylov, A., Gumenyuk, I. and Mikhaylova, A. (2015) The SERVQUAL model in Measuring Service Quality of Public Transportation: Evidence from Russia. Quality: Access to Success, 16, 78-83.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cavana, Y.R., Corbett, M.L. and Lo, Y.L. (2005) Developing Zones of Tolerance for Managing Passenger Rail Service Quality. Victoria Management School, Victoria University of Wellington, Transpower New Zealand Ltd., Wellington.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frost, F.A. and Kumar, M. (2001) Service Quality between Internal Customers and Internal Suppliers in an International Airline. International Journal of Quality &amp; Reliability Management, 18, 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710110386996</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Badri, M.A., Abdulla, M. and Al-Madani, A. (2005) Information Technology Center Service Quality. International Journal of Quality &amp; Reliability Management, 22, 819-848. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710510617247</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Islam, R., Chowdhury, M.S., Sumann Sarker, M., and Ahmed, S. (2014) Measuring Customer’s Satisfaction on Bus Transportation. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 6, 34-41. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajebasp.2014.34.41</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pakdil</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2014</year>)<article-title>Improving Service Quality in Highway Passenger Transportation: A Case Study Using Quality Function Deployment</article-title><source> European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 376</fpage>-<lpage>394</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barabino, B., Deiana, E. and Tilocca, P. (2012) Measuring Service Quality in Urban Bus Transport: A Modified SERVQUAL Approach. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 4, 238-252. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566691211269567</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anderson, R., Sweeney, D.J. and Williams, T.A. (2019) Book of Statistics for Business and Economics. 14th edition, Chapter-9, Cengage Learning, Boston.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Glen, S. (n.d.) P-Value in Statistical Hypothesis Tests: What is it? Statistics HowTo.com.https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/statistics-definitions/p-value/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names> K.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>Expectations and Perceptions of Passengers on Service Quality with Reference to Public Transport Undertakings</article-title><source> IUP Journal of Operations Management</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 67</fpage>-<lpage>81</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karim, M.M. and Mannan, M.S. (2008) Mass Transit Demand in Dhaka Metropolitan and Review of Alternatives. http://www.engconsult.com/envart/mass.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ulkhaq, M.M., Ardiani, A.J., Farhan, M., Bagja, R.P. and Hanif, R.Z. (2019) Service Quality Analysis of Bus Rapid Transit: AA Case in Semarang, Indonesia. 4th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering, ICITE 2019, Singapore, 5-7 September 2019, 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITE.2019.8880229</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valenzo-Jiménez, M.A., Lázaro-López, D.A. and Martínez-Arroyo, J.A. (2019) Application of the SERVQUAL Model to Evaluate the Quality in the Transportation Service in Morelia, Mexico. DYNA (Colombia), 86, 64-74. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v86n211.78368</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1988) SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Galeeva, R.B. (2016) SERVQUAL Application and Adaptation for Educational Service Quality Assessments in Russian Higher Education. Quality Assurance in Education, 24, 329-348. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-06-2015-0024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116805-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goldsmith, R.E. (1997) Anton, J. (1996). Customer Relationship Management: Making Hard Decisions with Soft Numbers. Journal of Leisure Research, 29, 355-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1997.11949802</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>