<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1108637</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-116799</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Traditional Livestock System and Pathologies Risk in the Small-Scale Pig Farming in Kamituga Sub County, Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Thierry</surname><given-names>Heri Cishesa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anicet</surname><given-names>Bahati Kavange</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Justin</surname><given-names>Zigashane Kulimushi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dieudonné</surname><given-names>Cigajir’Omwirhwe Rugendabanga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Crispin</surname><given-names>Ndagano Kamole K’Eka</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rosine</surname><given-names>Lufungulo Rosine</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Charles</surname><given-names>Bahavu Hangi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nshokano</surname><given-names>Baharanyi Josué</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Patient</surname><given-names>M. Zamukulu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff7"><addr-line>Faculty of Agronomy and Environmental Sciences, Université Evangélique en Afrique (UEA), Bukavu, South-Kivu Province, D.R. Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Environmental Sciences, Insititut Supérieur de Développement Rural (ISRD), Shabunda, South-Kivu Province, D.R. Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of General Agronomy, ISEAV, Walungu, South-Kivu Province, D.R. Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Biological, Faculty of Sciences, University of Burundi, Burundi</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Veterinaries Sciences, Institut Supérieur d’Etudes Agronomiques et Vétérinaires (ISEAV), Walungu, South-Kivu Province, D.R. Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Department of Social Organization, Institut Supérieur pour les Techniques de Développement (ISTD), Kalehe, South-Kivu Province, D.R. Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Department of Environment and Sustainable Development, ISTD, Kalehe, South-Kivu Province, D.R. Congo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>21,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Livestock is one of the main sources of animal protein and contributes significantly to livelihood famers. The objective of this study is to assess the influence of the traditional pig farming system on the risk of pig diseases in Kamituga in the South Kivu province. The present study was carried out in Kamituga among farmers who had at least 1 pig during the study period. The methodology was based on a survey combined with observations by means of a survey questionnaire that had previously been drawn up and sent to the herders. Results show that the major part of the farmers practice swine rearing because this activity constitutes a source of income for them (49%) of our respondents who affirm that climatic factors favorited diseases and constitute the main cause for the pathologies of pigs farming in the study area and 5% of the communities members showed the traditional system in divagation is the second source of pig diseases. African swine fever was the most frequent disease in free-ranging pigs in Kamituga with a rate of 42%, followed by diarrheal symptoms of various origins with a frequency rate of 29% and finally endo/ectoparasitic infestations.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Livestock System</kwd><kwd> Pig Farming</kwd><kwd> Pathology</kwd><kwd> Mwenga</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Pig farming represents an important source of nutritional protein from its composition and organoleptic highly qualities appreciated by households but also by its remarkable important source of livelihood for the poor communities in the tropical regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref1">1</xref>]. In the world, most pig farms are run by family households, with a variety of production methods ranging from extensive farming to industrial off-farm production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, traditional free-range pig farming is based on traditional livestock technologies and is mainly carried out by small- scale farmers in rural areas who do not respect any livestock health standards; it supplements agricultural or artisanal activities with local breeds of a limited yield and with the associated livestock health risks for the households dependent on the latter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref4">4</xref>]. The local breeds of pigs are popular because of their adaptability and suitability to the environment, as well as their capacity to use all household and harvest waste and in some cases even certain types of feed. Though this type of breeding does not generate a high production cost for the owner, but the minimum sanitary requirements for breeding must be strictly respected in order to improve its production and limit the disease risks due to a lack of monitoring [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref5">5</xref>]. The origin of the latter is in fact an often unsanitary husbandry habitat, a feed of low nutritional value with less well balanced rations, essentially fiber and composed of artisanal agri-food processing, crops and fodder and fruits, and rarely the feed with agro-industrial sub-products and mineral supplements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>However, the free-range system of livestock farming system presents the several problems. The problems are related to the monitoring and preventive treatment of livestock diseases, the transmission of zoonosis, the use of genetic resources of pigs with low animal performance, the scarcity of veterinary products to preserve the good animal health, the most frequent of which are parasites and African swine fever, which is economically devastating and dangerous for the economy and for public health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref8">8</xref>]. To these can be added the accidents and destruction of crops that stray animals can cause, with majors consequences for the recurrence of conflicts between farmers and pastoralists [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>The Past studies by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref13">13</xref>] on preventive measures in pig farming show that the most farmers do not pay any particular attention to livestock health, i.e. that preventive care is practically absent. On the other hand, in rural areas, farmers use traditional medicinal plants and other traditional products to treat their animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref14">14</xref>]. In Kamituga, the increase of swine pathologies is due to the breeders’ way of pigs’ herds. This in turn would be influenced by the lack of a healthy rationing plan, the quasi non-existence of a monitoring and zoo-sanitary management model with a correlation to low production and the risk of zoonosis. This paper aims to analyses the influence of the traditional free-ranging livestock production system on the recrudescence of pathologies in pigs’ farms in Kamituga, South Kivu.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Region Surveyed</title><p>The current study was conducted in the Kamituga in the chiefdom of Wamuzimu (“collectivit&#233;/chefferie”) in the territory of Mwenga (27˚30'29&quot; East longitude and 2˚36'4&quot; South latitude), Eastern part of Democratic Republic of the Congo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref15">15</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). In addition, Mwenga is located between. Mwenga territory is characterized by a varied relief with an altitude of 1500 m, the low plain with an altitude of &#177;680 m, and the Itombwe highlands in the East with an altitude of 2800 m. Generaly, Mwanga is characterized by a the humid tropical climate with high rainfall (1600 and 2200 mm/year) and high temperatures in the western part [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref16">16</xref>]. The eastern part has a mild climate, tempered by the altitude, with a 3-month dry season and a 9-month rainy season. The temperature in Mwenga averages 23˚C with a maximum of 37˚C and a minimum of 21˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref17">17</xref>]. Mwenga’s soils are fertile and alluvial, offering excellent conditions for the development of many crops: cassava, rice, maize, peanuts, etc. as main staple food for local communities, but soil erosion is the main challenge for this [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref18">18</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Data Collection and Analysis</title><p>Data collection was based on the individual interview using a questionnaire combination of observations in Kamituga during November 2018. The questionnaire was developed and sent to the pastoralists for respond to all question based on sociodemographic characteristics, livestock management system, sanitation system, feeding system, etc. A representative sample of 50 pigs’ herds taken at random from each group was selected. The collected data were submitted to descriptive statistical analysis and the test of correlation and significant differences were verified by the Statistical Package for the Social Science.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Socio-Economic Characteristics of Pigs’ Farmers</title><p>Pig production is a major source of livelihood for Kamituga’s farmers (up to</p><p>85%). It is most practiced by farmers aged 42 years, mainly women (52%) and with at least 3.6 years of experience. It was noted that 72% of the farmers in this part of the country were involved in free-range livestock farming systems. However, it was also observed that there is a system of semi-stable and stable farming. The latter are practiced at low impact, representing 19% and 9% respectively. In addition to pig farming, farmers are interested in agricultural activities. They practice cassava (41%) and groundnuts (18%) as monocultures, or intercropped (18%). Agriculture is the main activity (41%) for the majority of pig farmers in our study area, but others practice artisanal gold mining combined with agriculture (34%), teaching (14%), teaching combined with agriculture (3%), and only small-scale gold mining (8%). Pigs (52%) and pigs and ducks (31%) are the most common types of livestock production, although pigs and cows (5%) and pigs and goats (21%) are also practiced in our study area. In addition, 85% of the farmers in the study area practice pig farming mainly for household income, while 12% and 3% practice it to generate income and meat and only meat. The majority of pigs are raised in the traditional system (79%). (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>)</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Livestock Management</title><p>It was found that the majority of farmers obtain parents from their own farms (37%), although some are purchased on the market (27%). When selecting parents, livestock farmers base their decision either on sex (42%) or on size (13%). In the case of animal feed, 37% of farmers use cassava peelings and 33% crop residues, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Socio-economic characteristics of pigs’ herds</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Groupements</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Baligi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Buse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overall</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (year)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.02 &#177; 13.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.2 &#177; 14.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.1 &#177; 13.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Sex</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Man (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woman (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Occupation</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Teaching</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agriculture (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agriculture/Teaching (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mining/agriculture (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Artisanal mining (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Field ownership</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Major crops</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cassava (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Banana (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Groundnut (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cassava-groundnut intercroped (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cassava and maize intercropped (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cassava-Maize-Groundnut</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Other animal species</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pig (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pig and cattle (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pig and Duck (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pig and Goat (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Livestock experience (year)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6 &#177; 0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Livestock goal</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Income (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Income source and meat (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meat (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Livestock system</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traditional system (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Semi stabled (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stabled (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> General information on livestock management</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Divagation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Semi-stable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stable system</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Overall</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parents sources</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pay (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pay and in the farming (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pay and Donation (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NGO (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Donation and in the farming (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >In the farming (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Donation (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Criteria for selecting parents</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex and size (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex, size and Prolificit&#233; (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex, size, color and age (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex and age (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Size (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feeding mode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oilseed cake (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peelings and crops residus (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cassava peels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crops waste alone (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crops and household waster (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household waster alone (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Origine of Pig Diseases</title><p>These results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) show that 49% of the pigs farmers reported that climate is the principal source of disease in pigs living in free-range system and 5% showed that livestock systems are the secondary source of disease in pigs.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Pathologies Identification</title><p>Four pathologies were detected in pigs’ population living in free-range system in Kamituga: ascariadiosis and diarrhea symptoms in pigs reared in the study area (37%) and African swine fever (4%). However, pediculosis was also identified but at very low prevalence. In addition, Ascaridiosis and African Swine Fever (9%), Ascaridiosis and pediculosis (7%), Ascaridiosis alone (8%), diarrhea and ASF (2%), Diarrhea alone (2%), diarrhea and pediculosis (4%), ASF and pediculosis (3%) and ASF alone (24%) are the common pathologies on the pig farming in the study area. (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>)</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Origin of pathologies according to the farming system</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Divagation (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Semi-stable system (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stable system (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Overall (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Origine of diseases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magic and lack of sanitation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lack of sanitation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lack of sanitation and climate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Climate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lack of housing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Livestock system</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> The most common pathologies and symptoms observed in Kamituga pig farming according to the livestock system</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Divagation (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Semi-stable system (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stable system (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Overall (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Majors pigs diseases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ascaridiosis and Diarrhea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ascaridiosis and ASF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ascaridiosis and Pediculosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ascaridiose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diarrhea and ASF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diarrhea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diarrhea and Pediculosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ASF and Pediculosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ASF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pediculosis alone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Prevalence of Pigs’ Pathologies</title><p>African Swine Fever (ASF) and diarrheal symptoms were the most frequent diseases in pigs farmed in the grazing area of Kamituga, representing 42% and 29% respectively. In addition, ascaridiosis and ASF (8%), ascaridiosis alone (7%), ascaridiosis and diarrhea (9%), ascaridiosis and pediculosis (1%), diarrhea alone (1%), ASF and pediculosis (2%) and pediculosis alone (1%) are the frequent pathologies in the study area. (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>)</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Level of Disease Prevalence</title><p>As presented in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>, almost all age categories of pigs in living in the free-range area are affected by diseases (35%). However, it was observed that sows are the most vulnerable (25%).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Symptoms and frequent pathologies in the small-scale pig farming in Kamituga</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Divagation (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Semi-stable system (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stable system (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Overall (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Frequent diseases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ascaridiosis and ASF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ascaridiosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ascaridiosis and Diarrheal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ascaridiosis and Pediculosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diarrhea and ASF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diarrheal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ASF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ASF and Pediculosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pediculosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> The age range of the most pigs affected in Kamituga according to the type of farming</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Divagation (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Semi-stable system (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stable system (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Overall (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Category of animal affected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sow (female)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Piglet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >All</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sow and Piglet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Period of Appearance of Pathologies</title><p>The dry season is the most suitable period for the propagation of pathogens in pigs living in the free-range system (90%). However, other pathogens can be seen in the rainy season (10%). (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>)</p></sec><sec id="s3_8"><title>3.8. Treatment of the Pathologies</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref> shows that 49% of the interviewees use traditional treatments for affected animals. On the other hand, 26% of them do not use any treatments to the affected animals.</p></sec><sec id="s3_9"><title>3.9. Prevention of Pathologies</title><p>These results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>) indicate that 37% of the respondents use preventive measures on a regular basis. However, 14% of the respondents practiced stabled housing as a preventive measure. Quarantine practice (23%), pest control (16%) and vaccination practice (10%) are use also used as a preventive measure against pig’s disease in the study area.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> The period of appearance of the most frequent pathologies in Kamituga according to the farming system</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Modality</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Divagation (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Semi stabulation (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stabulation (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Overall (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Onset period</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry season</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rain season</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Treatment of the most frequent pathologies in Kamituga according to farming systems</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Divagation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Semi-stable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Veterinary control treatment</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Traditional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Parasite control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Preventive strategies against diseases according to the pig farming system in Kamituga</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Divagation (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Semi-stable (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stable alone (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Overall (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Prevntive measure</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Quarantine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pest control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vaccination</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stabulation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>These results on the socio-economic characteristics of pig farming show that pig farming systems are traditional and that they are a source of livelihood for the households of pig farmers in Kamituga. This results are similar with similar research has found by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref19">19</xref>] in Benin where this activity play an important socio-economic role to contribute in education, health, etc. This activity is generally practiced by people aged 42 years, the majority of whom are women with a percentage of 52%; their experience in the pig production sector is on average at least 3.6 years. Similar observations on the socio-economic situation in the pig production system have been made by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref20">20</xref>], echoing those of the [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref21">21</xref>] in support of this study among Kamituga farmers. Results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref14">14</xref>] in Benin converge with the situation in Kamituga, where it was noted that livestock production is mainly of the divagation type and is the most common in this part of the country (D.R. Congo), with a rate of 72%, with semi-stable livestock production, which is intermediate and well adapted. These practices have a low impact on production, as research results show [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref22">22</xref>]. In addition to pig farming, farmers integrate field activities such as cassava monoculture (41%), and groundnut (18%), or intercropped for diversifying livestock income and supplying feed for pigs.</p><p>Our results on the origin of pig diseases by finding that 49% of the respondents indicated that climatic factors are the main source of diseases in free- ranging pigs system and 5% indicated that livestock farming systems are the secondary source of diseases in free-ranging pigs, these results are in conformity with those of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref23">23</xref>]. In the study area, the complete feeding is practice by the majors’ pigs’ herds, but theirs travel long distance to obtain this and the fodder cost is the one of the main livestock production in the small-scale farming with 1 to 5 pigs. In the Walungu territory for example, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref25">25</xref>] indicated that the fodder scarcity is one of the majors livestock challenges limiting production in the small-scale farming. In context of forage scarcity, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref26">26</xref>] showed that some farmers feed their animals fodder collected along rivers, especially during the dry season in fodder-deficient areas.</p><p>Our results on the rate and preventive disease in the small-scale pig farming in Kamituga indicated that the ascariasis and the diarrheic symptoms are the majors’ pathologies with high frequency (37%) compared to the ASF (4%) others pathologies. In addition, the pediculosis is present in the study with a low production loses. These results are similar of many researchers as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref27">27</xref>] in Tanzania. Many study on the pig farming traditional system in the others regions tropical zones near agro-climatic conditions of the DR Congo particularly our study area mentioned that the climatic factors constitute the of major and dangerous causes of good health stability for high production for all animals species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref29">29</xref>] especially in conflict or post-conflict areas where all factors of animal production are limited [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116799-ref30">30</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The present study on the impact of traditional livestock based on the free- ranging type on the permanent pigs’ pathologies in Kamituga is the part of animal production and health discipline. The principles results indicated that the pigs living in divagation (free-ranging), in semi-stable and in stable alone represent 72%, 19% and 9% respectively. However, 85% of practice pig production is for livelihood income. In addition, 49% of pigs’ farmers indicated that the climatic factors are one of the majors’ causes of pigs’ pathologies in the pig traditional farming system and 5% of pigs’ pastoralists indicated that the livestock system causes disease. ASF is the frequent disease in the pigs farming (42%) with divagation as livestock system in the study area and the diarrheic symptom is the second frequent pig pathology with a rate of 29% for all pigs’ farming selected during study area.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Cishesa, T.H., Kavange, A.B., Kulimushi, J.Z., Rugendabanga, D.C., K’Eka, C.N.K., Rosine, R.L., Hangi, C.B., Josu&#233;, N.B. and Zamukulu, P.M. (2022) Traditional Livestock System and Pathologies Risk in the Small-Scale Pig Farming in Kamituga Sub County, Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Open Access Library Journal, 9: e8637. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108637</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.116799-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adoho, C., Olounlade, P., Azando, E., Hounzangbe-Adote, S. and Gbangboche, A. (2021) Zootechnical Importance and Internal Parasites of Local Pigs (Sus crofa domesticus) Raised in Benin: Bibliographic Synthesis. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 15, 1698-1716. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v15i4.30</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouma, E., Dione, M., Lule, P., Rosel, K. and Pezo, D. (2013) Characterization of Smallholder Pig Production Systems in Uganda: Constraints and Opportunities for Engaging with Market Systems. 4th International Conference on the African Association of Agricultural Economics, Hammamet, 22-25 September 2013, 15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndahama, H., Batumike, P., Bagalwa, J.-J., Kabale, B., Baluku, B., Bahizire, J.-L., Matembera, D. and Mushayuma, D. (2014) Analysis of Problems Linked to Pig Production Development at Katana, South-Kivu, DRC. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 7, 1384-1390.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akilimali, I., Wasso, D., Baenyi, P. and Bajope, B. (2017) Characterization of Smallholder Swine Production Systems in Three Agro-Ecological Zones of South Kivu (Democratic Republic of Congo). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 120, 12086-12097.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Youssao, A Koutinhouin, G., Kpodekon, T., Bonou, A., Adjakpa, A., Dotcho, C. and Atodjinou, F. (2008) Pig Production and Indigenous Genetic Resources in Suburban Areas of Cotonou and Abomey-Calavi in Benin. Revue d’élevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire Des Pays Tropicaux, 61, 253-243.  
https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.9995</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chea, B., Kang, K., Vipham, J., Tokach, L. and Tokach, M. (2020) Assessment of Pig Disease Prevention of Smallholder Farmers and Village Animal Health Workers in Rural and Peri-Urban Cambodia. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 10, 572-591.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2020.103037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wozniakowski, G., Pejsak, Z. and Jabloński, A. (2021) Emergence of African Swine Fever in Poland (2014-2021). Successes and Failures in Disease Eradication. Agriculture, 11, 738. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080738</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mutua, F. and Dione, M. (2021) The Context of Application of Biosecurity for Control of African Swine Fever in Smallholder Pig Systems: Current Gaps and Recommendations. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, Article ID: 689811.  
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.689811</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adisa, R. (2014) Land Use Conflict between Farmers and Herdsmen—Implications for Agricultural and Rural Development in Nigeria. In: Rural Development— Contemporary Issues and Practices, InTech, Rijeka, 100-118.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diogo, C., Dossa, L., Ulrich, F., Abdoulaye, B., Kossi, H., Houinato, M., Schlecht, E. and Buerkert, A. (2021) Farmers “and Herders” Perceptions on Rangeland Management in Two Agroecological Zones of Benin. Land, 10, 425.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/land10040425</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maliki, R., Sinsin, B. and Parrot, L. (2019) Farmers-Herders’ Conflicts Management for Sustainable Agro-Pastoral Land Use in the Guinea-Sudan Zone. European Journal of Scientific Research, 155, 94-114.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agbokounou, A., Ahounou, S., Issaka, K., Mensah, G., Koutinhouin, B. and Hornick, J. (2016) Characteristics of Local African Pig Farming. Journal of Animal &amp; Plant Sciences, 30, 4701-4713.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Holt, H., Inthavong, P., Blaszak, K., Keokamphe, C., Phongmany, A., Blacksell, S., Durr, P., Graham, K., Allen, J., Donnelly, B., Newberry, K., Grace, D., Alonso, S. and Unger, F. (2019) Production Diseases in Smallholder Pig Systems in Rural Lao PDR. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 162, 110-116.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.11.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ohouko, F., Koudouvo, K., Dougnon, J., Agbonon, A. and Gbeassor, M. (2020) Practice of the Pig Livestock Farming in the South Benin: Plant Use in the Food and Health Management. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 44, 7677-7694.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mubalama, L., Wasso, J., Buhendwa, G., Igunzi, F., Kandji, B., Ibucwa, M. and Kongolo, P. (2021) Knowledge and Traditional Practice versus Biodiversity Conservation in the Protected Areas: The Case of Population Living near Lake Lungwe, Eastern DR Congo. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 4, 18-35. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v4i2p103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mokoso, J.-Dieu, Aruna, J., Byalungwe, A., Lubula, C., Mukenge, M., Mushangalusa, J. and Kambala, G. (2021) Traditional Knowledge and Biodiversity Conservation in the Albertine Rift: The Case of the Pygmy and Lega Peoples Living in the Itombwe Nature Reserve in Eastern DRC. ESJ Social Sciences, 17, 319-348.  
https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2021.v17n32p319</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aruna, J., Musailwa, K., Bitundu, M., Mandongo, M., Mukenge, L., Kambale, G. and Makoso, J.-D. (2020) Climate Risks Assessment, Opportunities Related to the Evolution of Ecosystems and Limitation of the Provision of Ecosystem Services: Landscape Case of South-Kivu (Albertine Riflt, DRC). International Journal of Research—Granthaalayah, 8, 98-117.  
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i7.2020.426</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kulimushi, L., Pandurang, C., Mubalama, L. and Banswe, G. (2021) GIS and Remote Sensing-Based Assessment of Soil Erosion Risk Using RUSLE Model in South-Kivu Province, Eastern, Democratic Republic of Congo. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 12, 961-987. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1906759</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Djimenou, D. and Koudande, D. (2017) Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Pig Producers and Structure of Pig Herd in South of Benin. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 11, 2177-2193.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v11i5.19</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Youssouf, L. and Koussou, M. (2003) The Pig Breeding Is Unknown But Well Practiced in Chadian Rural Agro Systems and around Towns. Conference Proceedings, 9 p.  
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237271536_L'elevage_porcin_un_elevage_ignore_mais_pourtant_bien_implante_dans_les_agro-systemes_ruraux_et_periurbains_du_Tchad</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ndébi</surname><given-names> G.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Kamajou</surname><given-names> J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> and Ongla</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Analysis of Constraints to the Development of Pig Production in Cameroon</article-title><source> Tropicultura</source><volume> 27</volume>,<fpage> 70</fpage>-<lpage>76</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thornton, P. (2010) Livestock Production: Recent Trends, Future Prospects. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society, 365, 2853-2867.  
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0134</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Batumike</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2018</year>)<article-title>Identification of the Production Constraints of Swine Species in Lurhala, Walungu Territory</article-title><source> International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research</source><volume> 38</volume>,<fpage> 91</fpage>-<lpage>100</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maass, B., Katunga, D., Wanjiku, C., Gassner, A. and Peters, M. (2012) Challenges and Opportunities for Smallholder Livestock Production in Post-Conflict South Kivu, Eastern DR Congo. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44, 1221-1232.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-0061-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zamukulu, P., Ayagirwe, R., Ndeko, A., Bagula, E., Mondo, J., Ganza, D., Katunga, D. and Mushagalusa, G. (2019) Constraints and Opportunities of Crop-Livestock Integration System at Mushinga in the Eastern DR Congo. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 41, 7000-7014. https://doi.org/10.35759/JAnmPlSci.v41-3.4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Birthe, P., Muhimuzi, F., Bacigale, S., Wimba, B., Chiuri, W., Amzati, G. and Maass, B. (2016) Towards an Assessment of On-Farm Niches for Improved Forages in Sud-Kivu, DR Congo. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics, 117, 243-254.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karimuribo, E., Chenyambuga S., Makene, V. and Mathias, S. (2011) Characteristics and Production Constraints of Rural-Based Small-Scale Pig Farming in Iringa Region, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 23, Article No. 172.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heri, T., Mituga, V., Lutwamuzire, D., Zozo, S.,éraphin Metre, T. and Sanvura, V. (2015) Characterization of Ectoparasites for Guinea-Pigs Breeding and Test of Care with Palmist Oil Associated with Kerosene in Walungu Area/Sud-Kivu in the D.R. Congo. International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 14, 70-82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndébi, G., Kamgnia, B. and Tchoumboué, J. (2004) Study of Marketing Margins in Pig Marketing Channels in Cameroon. Tropicultura, 22, 104-109.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116799-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Katunga, D. and Muhigwa, J.-B. (2014) Assessing Post-Conflict Challenges and Opportunities of the Animal-Agriculture System in the Alpine Region of Uvira District in Sud-Kivu Province, D.R. Congo. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 2948-2955. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.520311</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>