This was a retrospective cohort study over a 9-year period between 2011 and 2020 of deliveries that took place at our facility.

The study was conducted at the Philippe Maguilen SENGHOR which is a university reference maternity hospital in the suburbs of Dakar.

In 2019, the institution recorded 7673 deliveries, including 1261 caesarean sections.

The study included all patients who delivered a monofetal pregnancy at the hospital with a newborn in longitudinal presentation (cephalic and breech) with a term of more than 33 weeks plus 6 days.

The patients were divided into two groups: the first group included patients who were diagnosed with a nuchal cord at the time of delivery, which we will refer to as the “exposed patients”; the comparison group included all patients who had delivered during the same period without a nuchal cord.

For this study, we considered maternal characteristics, labour and delivery data and neonatal prognosis for each patient. For parity, the patients were divided into two groups: primiparous (those who came for their first delivery) and the rest considered multiparous. For the term of the pregnancy there were three groups: term which was the reference, pre-term from 34 to 36 SA + 6 days and post-term beyond 41 SA + 6 days. Fetal heart sounds were assessed using the Pinard stethoscope and were considered abnormal in cases of bradycardia, tachycardia and irregularity. For the Apgar score at five minutes, patients were divided into two groups: score greater than or equal to 7 at five minutes was considered normal and a score less than 7 was considered low.

The parameters were collected into our computerized database. Data extracted from our database were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software 26.

Descriptive statistical analyses were carried out on the continuous quantitative variables to determine their position and dispersion parameters. We calculated the frequencies of the categorical or qualitative variables.

To identify the association between the outcomes and the independent variables, a bivariate analysis was performed.

The significance level was set to 5%.

The study found that the nuchal cord at delivery had a negative influence on neonatal prognosis with a higher frequency of caesarean section, fetal heart rate abnormalities during labour, poor Apgar score at birth and neonatal resuscitation.

The 1.8% frequency of nuchal cord found in our study is much lower than in the literature where frequencies ranging from 5% to 37% have been found. This could be due to the large size of our sample with 44,958 records included which is an argument in favour of the reliability of the results.

Regarding maternal characteristics, no association was found between maternal age and parity in our study. The same was true for what was found in the

*FHR: Fetal Heart Rate; *RR: Relative Risk; *CI: Confidence Interval.

literature [9] [13] [14] [15].

As reported by several authors, post-term is more frequent in case of cord circularity. This pathology could explain post-maturity by acting on the fetal head responsible of a bad descent which could delay the entry in labour. This same mechanism could also explain the fact that we find more premature rupture of the membranes and artificial induction of labour in this group [1] [14] [15].

Caesarean section was more frequent in the exposed group of patients (39.5% vs. 21.8%). This is explained by the impact of this pathology on the labour but especially on the foetus. On the neonatal aspect, there was a two times greater risk of having abnormalities of the fetal heart sounds and at the same time a poor Apgar score at birth. This is probably due to the fact that there may be compression and stricture of the fetal neck by the cord in this condition. It follows, as in our study, that more use was made of resuscitation measures for the newborn in this group (37% compared to 17%). These results are similar to those found by Abdo et al. who in a study assessing risk factors for neonatal asphyxia found three times more acute fetal distress in the presence of a nuchal cord (RR: 3.1 95; CI: 1.2 - 9.3) [16]. But these results are controversial, and for some authors the presence of nuchal cord is not necessarily associated with a poor neonatal prognosis [14] [17]. The difference in our study could be due to differences in the study design, the setting which is a referral health unit whose geographical location makes it a preferred location for obstetric evacuations. Also, there is the large sample size with 44,958 patients included which is an argument for reliability. The assessment of the fetal status at birth allowed us to find a quasi-similar rate of intrapartum fetal death in the two groups. This does not necessarily depend on the presence of the circular but above all on the quality and speed of management in the event of a fetal heart rhythm anomaly.

For clinical practice, it seems important to try to search for the presence of an umbilical cord circular at the 3rd trimester ultrasound or in early labour given the impact of this condition on neonatal prognosis. A study by Peregrine in 2005 evaluating ultrasound detection of cord circulars and the rate of caesarean section, found a circular in 34% with a high false negative rate (58%) [13]. This is relevant to the obstetrical attitude in cases where this condition is suspected antenatally. But as this author states, ultrasound diagnosis will only be useful if we can refine the technique to be able to diagnose nuchal cord reliably and predict cases where it may have an impact on the course of labour and neonatal prognosis. Should a caesarean section be used routinely or should a vaginal delivery be attempted with more rigorous monitoring of the fetal heart rate [13] [18] ?

This has two implications: firstly, there may be an increase in the rate of caesarean section in cases of antenatal suspicion; secondly, there may be an ethical problem in attempting vaginal delivery given the proven impact of this condition on neonatal prognosis.

This opens up possibilities for research, with the importance of carrying out studies on the evaluation of risk factors for neonatal asphyxia and also prospective studies on prenatal ultrasound diagnosis.

Only then can clear recommendations be made on the management of pregnancies complicated by umbilical cord anomalies.

The fact that it was a retrospective study limited the use of data with incomplete records and missing information.

The strengths of our study were the large sample size and the location of the study, which was a reference health center.