<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Animal Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7597</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojas.2022.122024</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS-116635</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Carcass Characteristics of Guinea Fowl Raised under Intensive System and Fed Diets Containing Yellow Maize, Millet and White &lt;i&gt;Sorghum&lt;/i&gt; as Energy Sources
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samuel</surname><given-names>Uaperendua Tjetjoo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>John</surname><given-names>Cassius Moreki</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Othusitse</surname><given-names>Ricky Madibela</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gaborone, Botswana</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>02</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>317</fpage><lpage>335</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>10,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This study investigated carcass characteristics of guinea fowl reared under intensive system
   
  and fed diets containing yellow maize, millet and white sorghum as energy sources compared to commercial broiler diets (control).
   A completely randomized design was used where 160 guinea fowl keets were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments. Data were analyzed using Procedure General Linear Model in Statistical Analysis Software (version 9.0). Results showed that dietary treatment did not (p &gt; 0.05) influence carcass characteristics of guinea fowl at the same age. However, carcass characteristics significantly (p &lt; 0.05) increased with age. From 6 to 16 weeks of age carcass dressed weight of guinea fowl increased from 301.73 &#177; 9.49 g to 1003.65 &#177; 26.77 g; 288.18 &#177; 9.49 g to 952.58 &#177; 26.77 g; 305.00 &#177; 9.49 g to 976.55 &#177; 26.77 and 292.81 &#177; 9.49 g to 970.08 &#177; 26.77 g for control, maize, millet and sorghum diets, respectively. Carcass yield slightly increased from 69.93
  %
   &#177; 3.67% to 72.81
  %
   &#177; 2.67%; 73.85
  %
   &#177; 3.67% to 76.31
  %
   &#177; 2.67% and 70.55
  %
   &#177; 3.67% to 72.37
  %
   &#177; 2.67% for control, millet and sorghum diets, respectively. Carcass yield of guinea fowl on maize diet decreased with age (76.18 &#177; 3.67 to 71.68 &#177; 2.67). Other parameters including empty gizzard, heart, liver, drumstick, thigh, back and breast increased with guinea fowl age for all the dietary treatments. Maize, sorghum or millet diets can be used in guinea fowl diets without affecting carcass characteristics. Further studies on the acceptance of meat by consumers and cost-benefit analysis of the dietary treatments should be conducted to enable formulation of guinea fowl diets using local feed resources.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Carcass Yield</kwd><kwd> Guinea Fowl</kwd><kwd> Keets</kwd><kwd> Local Feed Resources</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Guinea fowl production has gained momentum in various parts of the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref2">2</xref>] though mostly under smallholder production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref3">3</xref>]. Nevertheless, guinea fowl contributes substantially to the supply of animal protein in the form of meat and eggs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref6">6</xref>]. Unlike chicken eggs, consumption of guinea fowl eggs is not popular, thus guinea fowl are raised mainly for meat which is served in restaurants around the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref8">8</xref>]. The gamey flavour of guinea fowl meat with a higher protein content of approximately 28% compared to 20% of domestic fowl might be the factor that influences its preference and demand [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>Guinea fowl have low input requirements with greater capacity to scavenge for feed and convert it to high quality meat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref10">10</xref>]. Guinea fowl meat has a higher edible yield than chicken meat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref11">11</xref>]. Musa et al. (2006) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref12">12</xref>] noted that the success of poultry meat production is strongly related to improvements in growth and carcass yield, mainly by increasing breast proportion and reducing abdominal fat. The authors mentioned that the proportions of major carcass tissues (i.e., breast, liver, heart, leg and abdominal fat) and their distribution throughout the carcass are important to carcass value. Manipulation of these traits depends on the combined genes and nutrition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref12">12</xref>]. Therefore, guinea fowl production requires knowledge and understanding of their growth characteristics and patterns to allow for the design of optimum management practices [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>The optimum slaughter age of guinea fowl is 16 weeks of age because of the subsequent decline in feed conversion ratio (FCR) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref14">14</xref>]. At this age, live weight of unimproved indigenous guinea fowl is approximately 1 kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref15">15</xref>] compared to approximately 2 kg for improved strains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref13">13</xref>]. According to Say (1987) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref16">16</xref>] and Moreno et al. (2000) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref17">17</xref>], guinea fowl meat contains higher protein content (23%) than beef (22.3%). In Botswana, Moreki et al. (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref18">18</xref>] obtained protein content of guinea fowl meat of 22.9% and 31.6% at 6 and 12 weeks of age, respectively. In another study, Mareko et al. (2008) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref19">19</xref>] reported that guinea fowl meat protein content averages well above the typical mammalian muscle at 19%. Guinea fowl meat has low fat content (4%) compared to chicken (11%), lamb (25%) and pork (21%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref18">18</xref>]. This makes guinea fowl meat appealing to the health-conscious market. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the carcass characteristics of guinea fowl fed diets containing three cereal grains, i.e., millet, white sorghum and yellow maize as energy sources compared to commercial broiler diets under intensive management system.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Experimental Site</title><p>The study was carried out at Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (BUAN) Guinea Fowl Rearing Unit, Sebele Content farm. The university is 24˚33'S, 24˚54'E and is located at an altitude of 994 m above sea level with an average annual rainfall of 538 mm and mean daily temperature of 30˚C.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Ethical Approval</title><p>This study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Diet Formulation</title><p>Four experimental diets were formulated according to Botswana Standard for Guinea fowl (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The isonitrogenous and isocaloric experimental diets were formulated based on three local grown cereals; yellow maize, white sorghum and millet (Tables 2-4) with commercial broiler diets used as control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Keets were fed the same commercial starter broiler diets from 1 to 20 days of age. The experimental diets were offered from 3 to 16 weeks of age.</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Nutrient composition of guinea fowl diets</title></caption><table-wrap id="1_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Nutrients</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Starter</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Grower</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Breeder</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 - 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Available phosphorus (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sodium (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arginine (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lysine (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Methionine (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Methionine + cystine (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tryptophan (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Histidine (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leucine (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isoleucine (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phenyalanine (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phenyalanine (%) + tyrosine (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Threonine (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Valine (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamins (per kg of diet)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin A (IU)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin D3 (IU)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Choline equivalents (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Riboflavin (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pantothenic acid (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin B12 (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Folic acid (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Biotin (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="1_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Niacin (mg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >60</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >40</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >40</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >60</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin K (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin E (IU)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thiamin (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pyridoxine (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trace minerals (per kg of diet)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Manganese (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zinc (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Selenium (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iodine (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>Source: Ensminger et al. (1990) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref20">20</xref>]; Leeson &amp; Summers (1997) cited in BOS 234:2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref21">21</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of experimental diets fed to guinea fowl from 0 to 6 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Dietary treatments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolisable Energy, MJ/Kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ingredient, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow maize (10.6% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum (10.6% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet (14.0% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soybean meal (38% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fishmeal (60% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lucerne (16% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin premix</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dicalcium Phosphate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proximate analysis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry matter, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fibre, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fat, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrogen Free Extract, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolisable Energy, MJ/Kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.88</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of experimental diets fed to guinea fowl from 7 to 12 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Dietary treatments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolisable Energy MJ/Kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ingredient, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow maize (10.6 CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum (10.6% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet (14.0 CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soybean meal (38% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fishmeal (60% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lucerne (16% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin premix</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dicalcium Phosphate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proximate analysis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry matter, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fibre, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fat, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrogen Free Extract, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolisable Energy, MJ/Kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.84</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="4"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of experimental diets fed to guinea fowl from 13 to 16 weeks of age</title></caption><table-wrap id="4_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Dietary treatments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolisable Energy, MJ/Kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ingredient, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow maize (10.6% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum (10.6% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet (14.0% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soybean meal (38% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fishmeal (60% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lucerne (16% CP)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin premix</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dicalcium Phosphate</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proximate analysis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry matter, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fibre, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude fat, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >573</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrogen Free Extract, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolisable Energy, MJ/Kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.96</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Nutrient composition of commercial broiler diets (mash) fed to guinea fowl from 0 to 16 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ingredients</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Starter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Grower</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Finisher</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fibre (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fat (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorus (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lysine (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolisable Energy, MJ/Kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Experimental Design</title><p>A total of 160 unsexed three weeks old keets were randomly allocated to 16 pens designed to meet the animal welfare standards for optimum production in guinea fowl. Each dietary treatment had four replicate pens as the experimental unit with 10 keets in a completely randomized design (CRD).</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Animal Management</title><p>Keets were hatched at BUAN hatchery unit and raised in a closed house which provided both warmth and adequate ventilation. At 3 weeks of age, keets were transferred to growing pens where they were randomly assigned to 4 dietary treatment groups which comprised control diet and experimental diets consisting of yellow maize, white sorghum and millet as energy sources. Birds were housed in earth floor pens with perches. A drinker and a feeder were placed in each pen. Feed and water were provided ad libitum to all treatments.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Slaughter Procedure</title><p>At 6, 12 and 16 weeks of age, 3 birds from each replicate (12 birds from each dietary treatment) were randomly selected, weighed (final weight) and transported to BUAN slaughter facility for humane slaughter to assess carcass traits and internal organs. Feed and water were withdrawn 12 hours prior to slaughter to prevent digesta and faeces from contaminating carcasses. At the abattoir, the birds were slaughtered by cervical dislocation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref22">22</xref>], bled by section of the jugular veins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref23">23</xref>] and scalded in hot water at 65˚C - 70˚C for 3 minutes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref24">24</xref>]. Thereafter, birds were de-feathered and eviscerated. Heads, necks and feet were then removed from carcasses.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Carcass Characteristics and Internal Organs</title><p>After slaughter, carcasses were immediately weighed to obtain the hot carcass mass. Following evisceration, internal organs (i.e., gizzards, livers and hearts) were removed and weighed individually. Gizzards were emptied prior to weighing. The hot carcass weight of each bird was recorded and the dressing out percentage calculated. The slaughter weight and hot carcass weight were used to determine the dressing percentage of birds, expressed as carcass weight/final weight * 100 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref25">25</xref>]. Thereafter, carcass cuts of the breast, thigh, back, wing and drumstick were removed and weighed separately. Parts yield (breast, thigh and drumstick) was calculated as the average parts and carcass weight using the formula, parts yield (%) = PY/CW * 100 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref26">26</xref>]. Where, PY = parts yield and CW = carcass weight.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data on carcass characteristics and internal organs of guinea fowl meat were analysed using the GLM procedure of SAS. The PDIFF option of SAS (2010) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref27">27</xref>] was used to perform pairwise comparisons of the least square means. The statistical model was as follows:</p><p>Y i j = μ + T i + ε i j</p><p>where: Y<sub>ij</sub> = observation (carcass characteristics and internal organs), &#181; = population mean constant common to all observations, T<sub>i</sub> = effect of diet and ε<sub>ij</sub> = random error term, for all tests, the level of significance was set at p &lt; 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Carcass traits</title><p>Diets had no effect (p &gt; 0.05) on the carcass traits of guinea fowl at 6, 12 and 16 weeks of age except on thigh weight at 6 weeks of age and back, wing and drumstick weights at 16 weeks of age (Tables 6-8). At 6 weeks of age, birds fed maize-based diet had lower (p &gt; 0.05) thigh weights than the other dietary treatments which themselves did not differ significantly. Conversely, at 16 weeks of age, birds fed millet-based diet had lower (p &gt; 0.05) wing weights than other dietary treatments which themselves did not differ significantly. Likewise, birds fed millet and maize-based diets recorded lower (p &gt; 0.05) back and drumstick</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> The effect of cereal-based diets on carcass traits and internal organs of guinea fowl at 6 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dietary treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >SEM</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carcass traits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Live weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >434.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >386.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >414.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >423.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carcass weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >301.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carcass yield (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breast weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thigh weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.71<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.88<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.54<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.49<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Back weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wings weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drumstick weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breast muscle yield (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thigh yield (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drumstick yield (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Internal organs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liver weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gizzard weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SEM = Standard Error of Means; <sup>a,b,c</sup>In a row, dietary treatment means with common superscripts do not differ (p &gt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap-group id="7"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> The effect of cereal-based diets on carcass traits and internal organs of guinea fowl at 12 weeks of age</title></caption><table-wrap id="7_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dietary treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >SEM</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carcass traits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Live weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >960.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >902.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >918.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >933.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carcass weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >690.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >659.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >681.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >674.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carcass yield (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breast weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >194.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >197.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >193.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thigh weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Back weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wings weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drumstick weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breast muscle yield (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thigh yield (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drumstick yield (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Internal organs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liver weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gizzard weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>SEM = Standard Error of Means; <sup>a,b,c</sup>In a row, dietary treatment means with common superscripts do not differ (p &gt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> The effect of cereal-based diets on carcass traits and internal organs of guinea fowl at 16 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dietary treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >SEM</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carcass traits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Live weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1384.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1333.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1287.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1336.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carcass weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1003.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >952.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >976.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >970.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carcass yield (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breast weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >315.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >290.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thigh weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Back weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118.30<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.08<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.18<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.85<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wings weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131.05<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126.64<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.64<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124.86<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drumstick weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.60<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.33<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.03<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.03<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breast muscle yield (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thigh yield (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drumstick yield (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Internal organs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liver weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gizzard weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.86<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.85.<sup>ac</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.91<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.64<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SEM = Standard Error of Means; <sup>a,b,c</sup>In a row, dietary treatment means with common superscripts do not differ (p &gt; 0.05).</p><p>weights than those on control diet. Generally, the drumstick and back weights of birds fed cereal-based diets did not differ significantly from each other. Overall, the carcass traits increased (p &lt; 0.05) with guinea fowl age for all the dietary treatments (Tables 9-14).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Internal Organs</title><p>Diets had no effect (p &gt; 0.05) on the internal organs of guinea fowl at 6, 12 and 16 weeks of age except on gizzard weight at 16 weeks of age respectively (Tables 6-8). At 16 weeks of age, birds fed control diet had lower (p &gt; 0.05) gizzard weight compared to those on millet and sorghum-based diets. Generally, the gizzard</p><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> The effect of cereal based diets on carcass weight (g) of guinea fowl at 6, 12 and 16 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Week (days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dietary treatments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >301.73<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288.18<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305.00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292.81<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >766.28<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >736.76<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >761.45<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >759.48<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1003.65<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >952.58<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >976.55<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >970.08<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.79</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SEM = Standard Error of Means; <sup>a,b,c</sup>In a row, dietary treatments means with common superscripts do not differ (p &gt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> The effect of cereal based diets on drumstick weight (g) of guinea fowl at 6, 12 and 16 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Week (days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dietary treatments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.55<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.86<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.18<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.05<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.41<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.63<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.63<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.59<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.60<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.33<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.03<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.03<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.19</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SEM = Standard Error of Means; <sup>a,b,c</sup>In a row, dietary treatments means with common superscripts do not differ (p &gt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table11" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> The effect of cereal based diets on thigh weight (g) of guinea fowl at 6, 12 and 16 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Weeks (days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dietary treatments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.71<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.88<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.54<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.49<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.94<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.08<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.66<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106.89<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.73<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151.46<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143.10<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153.98<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.63</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SEM = Standard Error of Means; <sup>a,b,c</sup>In a row, dietary treatments means with common superscripts do not differ (p &gt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table12" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> The effect of cereal based diets on back weight (g) of guinea fowl at 6, 12 and 16 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Week (days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dietary treatments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.04<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.21<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.08<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.08<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.34<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.48<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.85<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.76<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118.30<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.08<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.18<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.85<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.48</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SEM = Standard Error of Means; <sup>a,b,c</sup>In a row, dietary treatments means with common superscripts do not differ (p &gt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table13" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>3</label><caption><title> The effect of cereal based diets on breast weight (g) of guinea fowl at 6, 12 and 16 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Weeks (days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dietary treatments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.49<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.79<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.01<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.80<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214.13<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >222.53<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >223.33<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214.21<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >315.68<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >290.41<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296.36<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292.09<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.82</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SEM = Standard Error of Means; <sup>a,b,c</sup>In a row, dietary treatments means with common superscripts do not differ (p &gt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table14" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>4</label><caption><title> The effect of cereal based diets on wing weight (g) of guinea fowl at 6, 12 and 16 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Weeks (days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dietary treatments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.06<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.38<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.69<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.64<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.76<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.55<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.64<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.76<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131.05<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126.64<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.83<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.04<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SEM = Standard Error of Means; <sup>a,b,c</sup>In a row, dietary treatments means with common superscripts do not differ (p &gt; 0.05).</p><p>weight for birds fed cereal-based diets were not significantly different from each other. Consistent with carcass traits, the internal organs increased (p &lt; 0.05) with guinea fowl age for all dietary treatments (Tables 15-17).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Carcass Traits</title><p>The success of poultry production is dependent on improved growth performance and carcass quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref29">29</xref>]. The present results show that diet significantly improved carcass traits of guinea fowl at same stage of growth except thigh weight at 6 weeks of age and wing and drumstick weights at 16 weeks of age. In agreement with this finding, Medugu et al. (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref30">30</xref>], Baurhoo et al. (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref31">31</xref>] and Masenya et al. (2021) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref32">32</xref>] reported efficient use of cereal grains by poultry, which in turn resulted in superior carcass quality. Efficient utilization of feed has been shown to promote muscle development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref33">33</xref>], which is required by the growing market for cut-up poultry parts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref35">35</xref>]. Generally, birds fed millet-based diet had lower back, wing and drumstick weights at 16 weeks of age than other dietary treatments. This could be due to the intrinsic characteristics of pearl millet, particularly the high levels of phytic acid which has detrimental effect on protein utilization and bone mineralization. Pearl millet contains 354 - 796 mg/g<sup>−1</sup> of phytic acid (Abdallaet al., 1998) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref36">36</xref>] which is believed</p><table-wrap id="table15" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>5</label><caption><title> The effect of cereal based diets on liver weight (g) of guinea fowl at 6, 12 and 16 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Weeks (days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dietary treatments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.03<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.65<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.95<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.64<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.95<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.11<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.13<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.76<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.06<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.75<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.48<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.04<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SEM= Standard Error of Means; <sup>a,b,c</sup>In a row, dietary treatments means with common superscripts do not differ (p &gt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table16" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>6</label><caption><title> The effect of cereal based diets on heart weight (g) of guinea fowl at 6, 12 and 16 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Weeks</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dietary treatments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.73<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.98<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.90<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.38<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.33<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.84<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.91<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.08<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.00<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.61<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.79<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SEM = Standard Error Means; <sup>a,b,c</sup>in a row, dietary treatment means with common superscripts do not differ (p &gt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table17" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>7</label><caption><title> The effect of cereal based diets on gizzard weight (g) of guinea fowl at 6, 12 and 16 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Weeks</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dietary treatments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maize</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Millet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorghum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.74<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.15<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.04<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.86<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.64<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.50<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.08<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.43<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.85<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.91<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.64<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SEM = Standard Error of Means; <sup>a,b,c</sup>In a row, dietary treatments means with common superscripts do not differ (p &gt; 0.05).</p><p>to affect the digestion of protein and mineral bioavailability in diets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref38">38</xref>]. This eventually could have affected the availability of amino acids and minerals (especially phosphorus) needed for muscle development resulting in lower carcass traits.</p><p>The weight of carcass traits in this study increased with guinea fowl age for all the dietary treatments. This finding is consistent with Kokoszyński et al. (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref39">39</xref>] who obtained a steady increase of carcass dressed weight of 866 to 947 g and 890 to 973 g for male and female guinea fowl, respectively from 13 to 16 weeks of age. For Nsoso et al. (2006) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref40">40</xref>], body weight increase demonstrates growth and development in farm animals. The present study recorded higher carcass parts weights than those reported in previous studies at 16 weeks of age. Nsosoet al. (2003) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref42">42</xref>] reported lower drumstick and thigh weights of 100 and 140 g at 16 weeks of age. Similarly, Saina (2005) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref42">42</xref>] reported 105.6 &#177; 11.1 g and 131.7 &#177; 15.5 g during the same period. On the other hand, Ogah (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref43">43</xref>] obtained lower breast weight of 267.23 &#177; 1.69 g than those found in the present study at 16 weeks of age. This differences in carcass parts weights could be due to variation in dietary treatments and guinea fowl strains. The present study used pearl and lavender strains while Nsoso et al. (2003) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref41">41</xref>] used the progenies of wild and domesticated indigenous guinea fowl (the pearl) strains. Saina (2005) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref42">42</xref>] reported that indigenous guinea fowl strains have lower performance than improved strains.</p><p>The guinea fowl carcass yield (dressing percentage) obtained in the present study at 12 weeks of age was comparable to Fuentes et al. (1998) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref44">44</xref>] values of 75.13% and 75.74% for male and female guinea fowl, respectively. On the contrary, Seabo et al. (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref45">45</xref>] reported higher carcass yield values of 87.5%, 87.6% and 87.5% in guinea fowl on 14% CP, 16% CP and 18% CP diets, respectively during the same period. The difference in carcass yield between the three studies could be due to variations in sources of protein for dietary treatments. In the present study and that of Fuentes et al. (1998) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref44">44</xref>], soybean meal was used as a protein source in dietary treatments, whereas Seabo et al. (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref45">45</xref>] used sunflower cake as a protein source. Ara&#250;jo et al. (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref46">46</xref>] contended that despite its high fibre content (14%) and deficient lysine (0.5%) compared to soybean meal, sunflower cake is relatively rich in sulphur amino acids (methionine and cysteine). Sulphur amino acids are essential for optimum muscle accretion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref47">47</xref>].</p><p>Nevertheless, Mareko et al. (2006) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref25">25</xref>] reported a higher carcass yield of 94.17% at 12 weeks of age than the values obtained in the current study of 71.81% &#177; 1.76%, 74.03% &#177; 1.76%, 74.19% &#177; 1.76% and 72.13% &#177; 1.76% for control, maize, millet and sorghum diets, respectively during the same period. The variation in carcass yield values between the two studies could be due to difference in dietary treatments for guinea fowl stage of growth. The present study fed commercial broiler diet (control) and formulated guinea fowl diets consisting of cereal-based diets as starter, grower and finisher diets while in the study by Mareko et al. (2006) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref25">25</xref>] guinea fowl were fed only broiler grower diet. In agreement with the present study, Saina (2005) obtained carcass yield value of 71.6% in guinea fowl at 16 weeks of age. However, Kokoszyński et al. (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref39">39</xref>] reported lower carcass yield values of 70.1% and 70.7% in male and female guinea fowl, respectively at 16 weeks of age. According to Mareko et al. (2006) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref25">25</xref>], carcass dressing percentage is influenced by the stage of maturity, degree of finish, breed and intestinal contents (offal).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Internal Organs</title><p>Generally, the increase in liver and heart sizes is indicative of the presence of toxic substances in diets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref49">49</xref>]. In this regard, the present study shows that cereal-based diets did not affect liver and heart sizes indicating the absence of toxic substances in these diets. Similarly, diets did not affect gizzard weight but there was a tendency of birds fed cereal based diets to have slightly higher gizzard weights. These results are consistent with findings by Rama Rao et al. (2003) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref50">50</xref>] and Ibitoye et al. (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref51">51</xref>] who found no significant difference in gizzard and liver weights in broilers fed cereal based diets. On the contrary, Masenya et al. (2021) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref32">32</xref>] reported lower liver and gizzard weights in Jumbo quails fed sorghum-based diets. The observed increase in gizzard weight in birds fed cereal based diet could be attributable to the significant crude fibre values that range from 2.7 to 4.9, 1.65 to 7.94 and 13% in maize, sorghum and millet grains, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref53">53</xref>]. The size of the gizzard is determined by the amount of work required by the muscular walls of the organ to grind feed particles (Obun et al., 2008) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref54">54</xref>], which is strongly stimulated by fibre structures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref55">55</xref>].</p><p>The current study showed an increase in giblets weights (liver, heart and gizzard) with advancing age of guinea fowl. This could have resulted from the development of body organs which occurs as birds advance in age to conform to the general growth pattern [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref56">56</xref>]. Equally, diet and its components affect structural, physiological and histological changes of internal organs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref57">57</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref59">59</xref>]. In this study, giblets weights were observed to be higher than those recorded in previous studies. The current study recorded an increase in heart, liver and empty gizzard weights, respectively at 12 weeks of age whereas Seabo et al. (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref45">45</xref>] reported lower heart, liver and empty gizzard weight values which ranged from 3.85 - 3.89 g, 22.13 - 22.21 g and 26.48 - 27.50 g, respectively during the same period. The difference in giblet weights between the two studies could be attributed to varying protein levels in dietary treatments. In the present study, the crude protein levels were 20%, 18% and 16% for control diet, starter, grower and finisher diets, respectively and 24%, 20% and 15% for experimental guinea fowl diets. On the contrary, Seabo et al. (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref45">45</xref>] used the crude protein levels of 18%, 16% and 14% for starter, grower and finisher diets, respectively. In accordance with this study, Hosseini-Vashan et al. (2010) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116635-ref60">60</xref>] reported an increase in liver weight of broiler chickens with increased crude protein levels.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Generally, dietary treatment had no influence on guinea fowl carcass characteristics and internal organs at 6, 12 and 16 weeks of age. However, carcass characteristics and internal organs increased with guinea fowl age for all the dietary treatments. These results suggest that yellow maize, white sorghum or pearl millet diets can be used in guinea fowl diets without affecting the carcass characteristics and internal organs. Further research on meat characteristics and acceptance by consumers, as well as, cost-benefit analysis of the dietary treatments should be carried out to evaluate the effect of formulating guinea fowl diets using locally available cereal grains.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to thank Desmond Tutu Education Trust for financial support. Our profound gratitude goes to Messrs S. Mogwase, K. Podi, K. Kelemogile and Mrs S.C. Chiripasi for assistance during slaughter and measuring of growth parameters. Also, Dr. B. Sebolai, Mr. J. Makore and Ms. G. Nobo are gratuitously thanked for help with statistical analysis and interpretation. Our special gratitude is also extended to Ms. S. Dirienge for help with bird management.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tjetjoo, S.U., Moreki, J.C. and Madibela, O.R. (2022) Carcass Characteristics of Guinea Fowl Raised under Intensive System and Fed Diets Containing Yellow Maize, Millet and White Sorghum as Energy Sources. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 12, 317-335. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2022.122024</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.116635-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nahashon, S.N., Adefope, N., Amenyenu, A., Tyus, J. and Wright, D. (2009) The Effect of Floor Density on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of French Guinea Broilers. Poultry Science, 88, 2461-2467. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00514</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elhashmi, Y.H., El Amin, A. and Omer, F.A. (2012) Growth and Development of Muscles, Bones and Fat of Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris galeata). Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research, 1, 6-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Avornyo, F.K., Munkaila, L., Allegye-Cudjoe, E., Karbo, N. and Atosona, B.S. (2015) A Comparison of Six Treatments for Controlling Mortality of Keets in the Wet Season of the Northern Region of Ghana. Ghana Journal of Sciences, 55, 15-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwagu, B.I. and Alawa, C.B.I. (1995) Guinea Fowl Production in Botswana. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 51, 261-270. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19950018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohamed, A.E., Elhag, Z.M.M. and Mohamed, A.S. (2012) Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) as a Meat Bird. International Journal of Science and Research, 2, 98-111. https://doi.org/10.47556/J.IJSR.2.1.2011.5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Odukwe, C.N., Ukachukwu, S.N., Onunkwo, D.N. and Oke, U.K. (2017) Effect of Varying Energy and Protein Levels on Carcass Characteristics of Helmeted Guinea Fowl in the Tropics. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 44, 222-226. https://doi.org/10.51791/njap.v44i1.783</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nobo, G., Moreki, J.C. and Nsoso, S.J. (2012) Growth and Carcass Characteristics of Helmeted Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) Fed Varying Levels of Phane Meal (Imbrasia belina) as Replacement of Fishmeal under Intensive System. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6, 296-306. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijavms.164</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayeni (1980) The Biology and Utilization of the Helmeted Guinea Fowl (N.m. Galeata Pallas) in Nigeria. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tjetjoo, S.U., Moreki, J.C., Nsoso, S.J. and Madibela, O.R. (2013) Growth Performance of Guinea Fowl Fed Diets Containing Yellow Maize, Millet and White Sorghum as Energy Sources and Raised under Intensive System. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 12, 306-312. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2013.306.312</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mwale, M., Mupangwa, J.F., Mapiye, C., Saina, H. and Chimvuramahwe, J. (2008) Growth Performance of Guinea Fowl Keets Fed Graded Levels of Baobab Seed Cake Diets. International Journal of Poultry Science, 7, 429-432. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.429.432</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Teye, G.A. and Adam, M. (2000) Constraints to Guinea Fowl Production in Northern Ghana: A Case Study of the Damongo Area. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science, 33, 153-157. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjas.v33i2.1864</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Musa, H.H., Chen, G.H., Cheng, J.H., Li, B.C. and Mekki, D.M. (2006) Study on Carcass Characteristics of Chicken Breeds Raised under the Intensive Condition. International Journal of Poultry Science, 5, 530-533. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.530.533</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayorinde, K.L., Oluyemi, J.A. and Ayeni, J.S.O. (1989) Growth Performance of Four Indigenous Helmeted Guinea Fowl Varieties. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa, 36, 356-360.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Embury, I. (2001) Raising Guinea Fowl. Agfact. A5.0.8. New South Wales Agriculture Publications, New South Wales, 4. http://www.scribd.com/doc/3687</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mundra, B.L., Raheja, K.L. and Singh, H. (1993) Genetic and Phenotypic Parameter Estimates for Growth and Conformation Traits in Guinea Fowl. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 63, 445-450.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Say, R.R. (1987) Manual of Poultry Production in the Tropics. CAB International, Wallingford, 112-113.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moreno, LA., Vidal, A., Huerta-S&amp;#225nchez, D., Navas, Y., Uzc&amp;#225tegui-Bracho, S. and Huerta-Leidenz, N. (2000) Comparative Proximal and Mineral Analysis of Iguana, Poultry and Beef Meats. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrtricion, 50, 409-415.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moreki, J.C., Podi, K.T., Machete, J.B. and Nthoiwa, P.G. (2012) Chemical Analysis and Sensory Evaluation of Guinea Fowl Meat Fed Diets Containing Three Cereal Grains as Energy Sources Up to 12 Weeks of Age. International Journal of Science and Advanced Technology, 2, 59-66.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mareko, M.H.D., Nsoso, S.J. and Lebetwa, N. (2008) Nutritive Value of Meat of Guinea Fowl Raised on Concrete and Bare Soil Floors from 16-26 Weeks of Age. Research Journal of Animal Sciences, 2, 5-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">BOS 234:2006 Animal Feeding Stuffs: Guinea Fowl Feeds-Specifications, Gaborone, Botswana.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ensinger, M.E., Oldfield, J.E. and Heinemann, W.W. (1990) Feeds and Nutrition. 2nd Edition, Ensminger Publishing Company, Clovis, 1960.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moreki, J.C., van der Merwe, H.J. and Hayes, J.P. (2011) Influence of Dietary Calcium Levels on Bone Development in Broiler Breeder Pullets Up to 18 Weeks of Age. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research, 1, 28-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ikani, E.I. and Dafwang, I.I. (2004) The Production of Guinea Fowl in Nigeria. Extension Bulletin No. 207. Poultry Series No. 8. National Agricultural Extension and Research Liaison Services, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adetola, S.O., Onawumi, A.S. and Lucas, E.B. (2012) Investigation into Mechanized De-Feathering Process and Optimal Scalding Temperature of Exotic and Local Birds in South Western Nigeria. Transnational Journal of Science and Technology, 2, 87-96.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mareko, M.H.D., Nsoso, S.J. and Thibelang, K. (2006) Preliminary Carcass and Meat Characteristics of Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) Raised on Concrete and Earth Floors in Botswana. Journal of Food Technology, 4, 313-317.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faria, P.B., Bressan, M.C., Souza, X.R., Rossato, L.V., Botega, L.M.G. and Gama, L.T. (2010) Carcass and Parts Yield of Broilers Reared under a Semi-Extensive System. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 12, 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2010000300003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SAS (2010) Users Guide. Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc., Cary.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le Bihan-Duval, E., Millet, N. and Remignon, H. (1999) Broiler Meat Quality: Effect of Selection for Increased Carcass Quality and Estimates of Genetic Parameters. Poultry Science, 78, 822-826. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.6.822</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibrahim, D., El-Sayed, R., Khater, S.I., Said, E.N. and El-Mandrowy, S.A.M. (2018) Changing Dietary n-6:n-3 Ratio Using Different Oil Sources Affects Performance, Behaviour, Cytokines mRNA Expression and Meat Fatty Acid Profile of Broiler Chickens. Animal Nutrition, 4, 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.08.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Medugu, C.I., Saleh, B., Igwebuike, J.U. and Ndirmbita, R.L. (2012) Strategies to Improve the Utilization of Tannin-Rich Feed Materials by Poultry. International Journal of Poultry Science, 11, 417-423. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2012.417.423</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baurhoo, N., Baurhoo, B., Mustafa, A.F. and Zhao, X. (2011) Comparison of Corn-Based and Canadian Pearl Millet-Based Diets on Performance, Digestibility, Villus Morphology and Digestive Microbial Populations in Broiler Chickens. Poultry Science, 90, 579-586. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00954</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Masenya, T.I., Mlambo, V. and Mnisi, C.M. (2021) Complete Replacement of Maize Grain with Sorghum and Pearl Millet Grains in Jumbo Quail Diets: Feed Intake, Physiological Parameters and Meat Quality Traits. PLoS ONE, 16, e0249371. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249371</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kerr, B.J., Kidd, M.T., Halpin, K.M., McWard, G.M. and Quarles, C.L. (1999) Lysine Level Increases Live Performance and Breast Yield in Male Broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Science, 8, 381-390. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/8.4.381</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Souza, P.A., Kodawara, LM, Pelicano, E.R.L., Souza, H.B.A., Oba, A., Leonel, F.R., Norkus, E.A. and Lima, T.M.A. (2005) Effect of Deboning Time on the Quality of Broiler Meat (Pectoralis Major). Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 7, 123-128. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2005000200010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chang</surname><given-names> H.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Overview of the World Broiler Industry: Implications for the Philippines</article-title><source> Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 67</fpage>-<lpage>82</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdalla, A.A., Tinay, A., Mohamed, B.E. and Abdalla, A.H. (1998) Effect of Traditional Process on Phytate and Mineral Content of Pearl Millet. Food Chemistry, 63, 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(97)00194-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eltayeb, M.M., Hassan, A.B., Sulieman, M.A. and Babiker, E.E. (2007) Effect of Processing Followed by Fermentation on Antinutritional Factors Content of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) Cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 6, 463-467. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2007.463.467</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassan, Z.M., Sebola, N.A. and Mabelebele, M. (2021) The Nutritional Use of Millet Grain for Food and Feed: A Review. Agriculture and Food Security, 10, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-020-00282-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kokoszyński, D., Bernacki, Z., Korytkowska, H., Wilkanowska, A. and Piotrowska, K. (2011) Effect of Age and Sex on Slaughter Value of Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris). Journal of Central European Agriculture, 12, 255-266. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/12.2.907</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nsoso, S.J., Mareko, M.H.D. and Molelekwa, C. (2006) Comparison of Growth and Morphological Parameters of Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) Raised on Concrete and Earth Floor Finishes in Botswana. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 18, Article No. 101. https://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd18/12/nsos18178.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nsoso, S.J., Seabo, G.M., Kgosiemang, J., Molatlhegi, S.G., Mokobela, M., Chabo, R.G. and Mine, O.M. (2003) Performance of Progeny of Wild and Domesticated Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) in Southern Botswana. South African Journal of Animal Science, 4, 46-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saina, H. (2005) Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) Production under Smallholder Farmer Management in Guruve District, Zimbabwe. Master’s Thesis, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zimbabwe, Harare.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ogah, D.M. (2011) In Vivo Prediction of Live Weight and Carcass Traits Using Body Measurements in Indigenous Guinea Fowl. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 27, 1827-1836. https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1104827O</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fuentes, M.F., Zapata, J.F., Espíndola, G.B., Freitas, E.R., Santos, M.G. and Sousa, F.M. (1998) Sodium Bicarbonate Supplementation in Diets for Guinea Fowl Raised at High Environmental Temperatures. Poultry Science, 77, 714-717. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.5.714</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Seabo, D., Moreki, J.C., Bagwasi, N. and Nthoiwa, G.P. (2011) Performance of Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) Fed Varying Protein Levels. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research, 6, 255-258.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Araújo, L.F., Araújo, C.S., Petroli, N.B., Laurentiz, A.C., Albuquerque, R. and Neto, M.A.T. (2011) Sunflower Meal for Broilers of 22 to 42 Days of Age. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science, 40, 2142-2146. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011001000011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vieira, S.L., Lemme, A., Goldenberg, D.B. and Brugalli, I. (2004) Response of Growing Broilers Diets with Increased Sulphur Amino Acids to Lysine Ratios at Two Dietary Protein Levels. Poultry Science, 83, 1307-1313. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.8.1307</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diarra, S.S., Sandakabatu, D., Perera, D., Tabuaciri, P. and Mohammed, U. (2014) Growth Performance, Carcass Measurements and Organ Weight of Broiler Chickens Fed Cassava Copra Meal-Based or Commercial Finisher Diets in Samoa. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 8, 16-22. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2014.16.22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Disetlhe, A.R.P., Marume, U. and Mlambo, V. (2018) Humic Acid and Enzymes Inclusion in Canola Based-Diets Generate Different Responses in Growth Performance, Protein Utilization Dynamics and Hemato-Biochemical Parameters in Broiler Chickens. Poultry Science, 97, 2745-2753. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rama Rao, S.V., Raju, M.V.L.N. and Panda, A.K. (2003) Replacement of Yellow Maize with Graded Levels of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum typhoides) in Commercial Broiler Diets. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 38, 236-242.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibitoye, E.B., Olorede, B.R., Jimoh, A.A. and Abubakar, H. (2012) Comparative Performance and Organ Relative Weight of Broiler Chickens Fed Three Sources of Energy Diet. Journal of Animal Production Advances, 2, 233-238.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jimoh, W.L.O. and Abdullahi, M.S. (2017) Proximate Analysis of Selected Sorghum Cultivars. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 10, 285-288. https://doi.org/10.4314/bajopas.v10i1.43</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prasanthi, P.S., Naveena, N., Vishnuvardhana-Rao, M. and Bhaskarachary, K. (2017) Compositional Variability of Nutrients and Phytochemicals in Corn after Processing. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 54, 1080-1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2547-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Obun, C.O., Olafadehan, O.A., Ayanwale, B.A. and Inuwa, M. (2008) Growth, Carcass and Organ Weights of Finisher Broilers Fed Differently Processed Detarium microcarpum (Guill and Sperr) Seed Meal. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 20, 1-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hetland, H., Svihus, B. and Choct, M. (2005) Role of Insoluble Fibre on Gizzard Activity in Layers. Journal Applied Poultry Research, 14, 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/14.1.38</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tarhyel, R., Hena, S.A. and Tanimomo, B.K. (2012) Effect of Age on Organ Weight and Carcass Characteristics of Japanese Quail (Coturnix Japonica). Scientific Journal Agriculture, 1, 21-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jiménez-Moreno, E., Gonz&amp;#224lez-Alvarado, J.M., Gonz&amp;#224lez-S&amp;#224nchez, D., L&amp;#224zaro, R. and Mateos, G.G. (2010) Effects of Type and Particle Size of Dietary Fiber on Growth Performance and Digestive Traits of Broilers from 1 to 21 Days of Age. Poultry Science, 89, 2197-2212. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00771</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malik, K., Lone, K.P., Farooq, A., Ullah, A., Andleeb, S., Talpur, M.A., Rashid, N., Choudhary, K.N. and Awan, K. (2012) Rapeseed Meal Feeding Effects on Total Proteins and Lipids of Japanese Quail. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 6, 5582-5586. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.1032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zaefarian, F., Abdollahi, M.R., Cowieson, A. and Ravindran, V. (2019) Avian Liver: The Forgotten Organ. Animals, 9, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9020063</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116635-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hosseini-Vashan, S.J., Jafari-Sayadi, A.R., Golian, A., Motaghinia, G.H., Namvari, M. and Hamedi, M. (2010) Comparison of Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Broiler Chickens Fed Diets with Various Energy and Constant Energy to Protein Ratio. Journal of Animal Veterinary Advances, 9, 2565-2570. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.2565.2570</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>