<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CMB</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Computational Molecular Bioscience</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3445</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/cmb.2022.121004</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">CMB-116300</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Antibody-Like Phosphorylation Sites. Theme for Studies of Cancer, Aging and Evolution
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jaroslav</surname><given-names>Kubrycht</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Karel</surname><given-names>Sigler</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratory of Cellular Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Physiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>58</fpage><lpage>83</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Sequence similarities were found between protein and DNA sequences encoding certain part of conserved variable immunoglobulin domains (
  <em>i.e.</em> conserved IgV) and phosphorylation sites. Hypermutation motifs were then indicated in the majority of the corresponding non-IgV nucleotide sequences. According to database confirmations or double prediction of phosphorylation sites, 80% of the selected human and mouse IgV-related phosphorylation sites or their highly probable candidates exhibited substrate relationship to ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated kinase known as ATM. In accordance with literature data, inactivation of ATM by mutations can participate in the mechanisms of carcinogenesis, neurodegeneration and possibly also in aging. In agreement with this relationship, some of the selected IgV-/ATM-related segments formed molecules specifically involved in carcinogenesis. The selected IgV-related sequence segments were also similar to certain segments of higher plants containing immunoglobulin-like repeats and related regions. Bioinformatic analysis of some selected plant sequences then indicated the presence of catalytic domains composing serine/threonine/tyrosine receptor/receptor-like kinases, which are considered important structures for evolution of very early and part of later Ig-domain-related immunity. The analyzed conserved domain similarities also suggested certain interesting structural and phylogenic relationships, which need to be further investigated. This review in fact briefly summarizes the findings on the subject from the last twenty years.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Ataxia-Telangiectasia-Mutated Kinase (ATM)</kwd><kwd> Carcinogenesis</kwd><kwd> Complementarity Determining Region 1 (CDR1</kwd><kwd> Hypervariable Region 1)</kwd><kwd> Conserved Domain(s)</kwd><kwd> Deep Evolution</kwd><kwd> Evolution</kwd><kwd> Hypermutation</kwd><kwd> Kinase(s)</kwd><kwd> Phosphorylation Site(s)</kwd><kwd> Plant Immunity</kwd><kwd> Variable  Immunoglobulin Domain(s) (IgV)</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Segments of immunoglobulin variable domains (IgV) of immunoglobulins (Ig) or T-cell receptors interacting with antigens as well as protein phosphorylation sites represent short peptides whose interactions can be considerably altered by one or a few non-synonymous mutations in the corresponding encoding DNA. Therefore, the question was whether at least some of the phosphorylation sites were not structurally close to IgV segments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref2">2</xref>]. In the initial examination of this question, our chain matrix was used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref3">3</xref>], and intertwined and linear similarities were found between 1) certain model protein kinase substrates or inhibitors and 2) different IgV consensi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref4">4</xref>]. The N-terminal IgV region containing the C-terminal part of FR1, the hypervariable CDR1 region and the N-terminal part of FR2 appeared to be the most structurally interesting in terms of the sought similarities and also frequent hypermutation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref5">5</xref>], while the greatest similarities between non-vertebrate metazoan IgV and also between different conserved IgV were found in the FR3 framework (this fact could be rather important for the evolution of recombination of antibody genes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>]). Nevertheless, not only the selected N-terminal regions but also such FR3 segments of different conserved IgV constructs exhibited dominant occurrence of predicted phosphorylation sites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>The corresponding more detailed search for IgV-related murine and human phosphorylation sites was then performed using 1) sequences of the conserved IgV domains corresponding to N-terminal region mentioned above, 2) bioinformatic procedures analyzing simultaneously the corresponding RNA and protein sequences (i.e. bilingual approach including mainly predictions based on artificial intellect and searches for hypermutation motifs) and 3) databases of existing phosphorylation sites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>] (for details see next chapter). This study and some related attempts mentioned above thus belonged to the medical studies of mutability or potential mutability of regulatory important phosphorylation sites. The number of such studies increased mainly in last ten years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref8">8</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>Existing and convincingly predicted phosphorylation sites also contributed to our attempt to search for Ig-domain-related structures in higher plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>] prolonging our part of research intended to evolution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref5">5</xref>]. These Ig-domain-related aims were accompanied with our little contribution to long lasting research specifically concerning deep evolution of the catalytic domains of serine/threonine/tyrosine kinases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref19">19</xref>] in the plant kinase molecules containing Ig-like segments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]. As well known, some of these kinases often accompany IgV domains in non-vertebrate metazoan proteins (cf. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]). For more detailed comments to our phylogenic studies see the chapter 3. Common features of the informatic processes used in our sequence-based investigations are described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. IgV-Like Phosphorylation Sites and Their Relatives Found in Human and Mouse Sequences</title><p>As was specifically described in the corresponding our paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>] (cf. also <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), several types of BLAST searches for IgV-related segments occurring within sequences different from antigen receptors were performed when using two multiple nucleotide sequence queries (MNQ) and score-derived or combined limits. In summary, these MNQ were formed by preselected 149 different conserved N-terminal non-redundant IgV segments of reference mRNA sequences encoding Ig and T-cell receptors. Following the searches with MNQ, anti-redundant procedures finally restricted the set of six hundred ten IgV-related nucleotide sequence segments.</p><p>To predict phosphorylation sites in the next selection step, the originally selected sequences were transformed to the corresponding protein sequences. The prediction was realized by means two methods based on artificial intellect [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>More precisely, we used online programs KinasePhos2.0 and NetPhos2.0 working on the principles of support vector machines and neural networks, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref21">21</xref>]. These programs usually selected most probable alternatives of substrate peptide segments for several kinases or phosphatases. This means that the programs mostly indicated fused chimerical regions of predicted phosporylations (FCRP) with close amino acids predicted as phosphorylated in the tested sequences. Such regions looked like partially realized or only sleeping pluri-pontent germ-like structures rather than sole phosphorylation sites. Primarily, all peptide segments achieving at least one prediction score 0.800 were restricted. Subsequently, we required presence of at least one certain tri- or tetranucleotide hypermutation motifs denoted here as HM* in the regions encoding superiorly predicted phosphorylation sites. These HM* were defined by 1) their location at positions critical with respect to possible aa alteration, i.e. as motifs associated with non-synonymous mutations and 2) the corresponding structure known from publications dealing with hypermutation of antigen receptors or hypermutation activities of oncologically important APOBEC enzymes (cf. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref23">23</xref>]).</p><p>In the next step, we required either experimental confirmation published in databases (databases PHOSIDA and Phospho.ELM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref25">25</xref>] were applied in this case) or simultaneous achievement of the limiting score by the both predicting methods. Seven protein sequences forming the set of sequences denoted as ALPS (i.e. antibody-like phosphorylation sites sometimes interpreted as FCRP due to predictions) were restricted by means the databases. Thirty five protein sequences different from ALPS composed set of sequences called ALPS2 (set of ALPS relatives mostly assembling FCRP) restricted only by successful double predictions. This set included among others two pairs of identical human and mouse sequences occurring in the corresponding orthologues. Fusion of ALPS and ALPS2 then yielded set of forty-two protein sequences entitled as ALPS+ above all dealt with the corresponding paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>The products of the corresponding maximum score pairs were individually enumerated for each ALPS+ by KinasePhos2.0 and NetPhos2.0. These products were distributed bimodally (formed two peaks), not as might be expected, with exponential decrease. More detailed statistical evaluation then indicated a strong and significant prevalence (p &lt; 0.05) of these products to higher values than value 0.880 (limit for two identical scores 0.938) constituting the inferior border product value for dominant peak of product frequencies in range of maximum possible product values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>]. This result suggests the existence of selective evolutionary pressure that probably maintains the function of ALPS+ of the dominant peak and thus also attests to their validity of prediction. Consequently, ALPS and ALPS+ which product values formed the dominant peak composed set of thirty seven functionally correlated ALPS+ items (including also two identical sequence pairs described above in case of ALPS2). ALPS+ of this set were called here as ALPS++. IgV-related protein sequences including these ALPS++ were used in the next phylogenic studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>] (see also chapter 3). Some ALPS++ selected by authors are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> (for associated sequencing projects see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref26">26</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref41">41</xref>] and NCBI database of nucleotide sequences).</p><p>Since IgV-related segments including ALPS+-encoding sequences were primarily searched using comparison with the representative nucleotide sequences of MNQ, not all of the corresponding peptide candidates for ALPS+ were found in the same reading frame as the antigen receptor sequences being compared. In spite of it, considerable number of the ALPS+ amino acid sequences translated outside the reading frame of antigen receptors were identified as substrates of almost the same phosphorylating enzymes like ALPS+ translated in the same frame as IgV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>In our opinion, this remarkable independence of the reading frame could be of interest for understanding the evolution of recognition plasticity by IgV of antigen receptors compared to ALPS+ (cf. for instance MHC context in recognition by T-cell receptors). In addition, the observed differences in the reading frame appear to be important in terms of possible epitope diversification after HM*-mediated mutation. While translation of the mutated code for ALPS+ in a different reading frame from antigen receptors could lead to neo-epitopes, the translation in the same frame more likely causes cross-interactivities with rheumatoid autoantibodies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>Despite independent selection for kinase specificity, 80 percent of the selected ALPS+ segments were predicted as substrates for ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated kinase (ATM) phosphorylating substrate on serine. Interestingly, inactivating mutations of the gene encoding ATM inhibit DNA damage response concerning first of all double strand breaks and lead to oxidative stress, genomic instability, disregulation of mitochondrial homeostasis and autophagy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref44">44</xref>]. Such changes then cause cancer (mainly lymphomas), neurodegeneration, immunodeficiency, chronic lung disease and segmental premature aging [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref48">48</xref>]. Consistently with this fact, more than a quarter of the selected molecules containing ALPS+ were among those important in oncogenesis (cf. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Besides ATM-related ALPS+, we found among others ALPS+ of relationship to kinase Aurora, i.e. kinase that directly regulates the activity of the most frequently predicted ATM via its phosphorylation. In addition to ATM-phosphorylated serine, phosphorylations of threonine and tyrosine were also predicted in the evaluated IgV-related protein sequence segments. In summary, the results concerning predictions of phosphorylating enzymes were consistent with the previously predicted occurrence of phosphorylation sites in the corresponding compared N-terminal parts of model conserved IgV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>Several notable relationships followed from the statistical evaluation of HM* occurrence in the corresponding DNA sequences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>]. Only six human and four mouse DNA segments encoding ALPS+ included HM* in template (RNA complementary, i.e. directly transcribed) strands. In addition, the ratio between the occurrence of HM* and complementary group of hypermutation motifs was</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Selected existing or extremely probable ALPS++</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Title of molecule<sup>a</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sp<sup>a</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Clonal names<sup> </sup> of sequences<sup>b</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IgV-like segments</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IgV-like similarities</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >aa_ HM*<sup>b</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Prediction or database confirmation of phosphorylation sites</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS/PS<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Position of NS/PS<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-max BS<sup>c</sup> -FrS<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pos_aa<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Score NetP<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KinP<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kinase species<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Doublecortin-like kinase 1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref30">30</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >XM_006500983.1 BAC41418.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1343 - 1323 359 - 365</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.1 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11S*PF 11S 13S 16S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 0.994 0.997- - 0.810-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 0.970 0.942 0.924 0.982 0.879</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- GSK3 GSK3 ATM ATM PLK1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tanslation factor BP (EIF4EBP1) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref31">31</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AK312011.1 BAG34949.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 56 1 - 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6S 8S*P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.944 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.982 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATM ATM</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limk2 (kinase) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref30">30</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >XM_006514552.1 XP_006514615.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >365 - 347 93 - 99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.1 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20S 20S*PF 22S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.991 - 0.979 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.907 - 0.945 0.891</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATM - Aur GSK3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zinc finger protein 687 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref33">33</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NM_020832.1 NP_065883.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1363 - 1388 422 - 430</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23S*P 23S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 0.992 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 0.894 0.827</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- ATM CK1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ppp1r18/phostensin (phosphatase) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref30">30</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >XM_006536704.1 XP_006525157.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >907 - 889 241 - 247</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.1 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13T*PF 13T</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 0.976</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- -</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rps6ka4 (ribosomal PK) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref30">30</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >XM_006527231.1 XP_006527294.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1573 - 1605 355 - 366</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.3* 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16S*P 16S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- - -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 0.965 0.909</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAPK14 ATM MAPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAP3K1 (kinase) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref34">34</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >XM_005248520.2 Q13233.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3795 - 3777 1401 - 1407</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12T*PF 9S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- - - - -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 0.962 0.888 0.876 0.857</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAP3K1<sup>#</sup> Aur GSK3 CK1 ATM</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coiled-coil domain containing 88B [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref35">35</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >XM_006718519.1 XP_006718582.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1782 - 1808 578 - 587</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14S 21S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.996 - 0.990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.986 0.877 0.925</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATM PLK1 ATM</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tight junction protein ZO-3 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref30">30</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >XM_006513708.1 XP_006513771.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1214 - 1193 313 - 320</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10S 14S 18S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.998 0.998 0.997 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.954 0.984 0.977 0.888</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATM ATM ATM MAPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rps6kc1 (ribosomal kinase) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref36">36</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >XM_006497177.1 NP_848890.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >671 - 701 214 - 224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.1 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11S 18S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.995 0.951</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.975 0.959</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATM ATM</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mia3 (melanoma inhibitory) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref37">37</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NM_177389.3 NP_796363.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1771 - 1755 561 - 591</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.2* 16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14S 17S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.958 - 0.994</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.957 0.881 0.970</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATM PLK1 ATM</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Up-regulated in liver cancer 1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref38">38</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AB056749.1 NP_060177.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2500 - 2538 819 - 831</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.1* 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10S 24S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.958 - 0.994</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.968 0.877 0.969</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATM PKB ATM</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAGEE1 (melanoma antigen) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref39">39</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NM_020932.2 NP_065983.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >517 - 546 80 - 90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.3* 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.991 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.967 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATM</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gltscr1 (tumor suppressor candidate) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref40">40</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NM_001081418.1 NP_001074887.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3610 - 3645 1168 - 1180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20S 22S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.998 - 0.938 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.958 0.925 0.908 0.908</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATM GSK3 ATM GSK3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KDR = VEGF receptor 2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref41">41</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NM_002253.2 NP_002244.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2343 - 2378 681 - 692</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.7* 42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9S 13S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.975 0.984 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.977 0.921 0.849</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATM ATM PKB</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slowmo homolog 2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref30">30</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >XM_006500002.1 XP_006500065.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >658 - 698 110 - 123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.2 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16S 19S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.907 0.961 -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.937 0.945 0.877</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATM ATM Aur</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>The order of items was sorted according to 1) database confirmed existence and 2) products of score values obtained with ALPS++ predictions. pos_aa: predicted or database confirmed phosphorylated aa is denoted by a single character accompanied by the number indicating the corresponding aa position in the corresponding IgV-related peptide; *F, *P, *PF: database records confirming the existence of phosphorylation sites were found using Phosida, Phospho.ELM or both databases, respectively; Hu: human; KinP, NetP: scores obtained with prediction realized by KinasePhos2.0 and NetPhos2.0, respectively; Mu: mouse; Sp: species origin. <sup>b</sup>aa_HM*: number of amino acids (aa), which compose existing or superior predicted phosphorylation site and are encoded by aa-altering nucleotide HM*; NS/PS: items in the two following rows concern nucleotide and protein sequences, respectively. <sup>c</sup>The similarities between pre-selected conserved-IgV-domain-related nucleotide sequences of vertebrate antigen receptors (IgV-NS) and human or mouse non-Ig sequences were searched. Maximum local bit score higher than thirtyor maximum bit score higher than twenty five together with the presence of more than five supporting similarities were required. The records of supporting similarities had to comprise a) almost the same segment of subject sequence like the supported maximum similarity, b) different IgV-NS and c) score higher than 22 bits. For more detailed information see the corresponding original paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>]. FrS: frequency of supporting similarities; max BS: maximum bit score of similarity with IgV-NS; asterix,i.e. * after score values lower than 30: effective frequency of supporting similarities was required. <sup>d</sup>kinases specifically related to ALPS++ segments #: autophosphorylation; Aur: Aurora-related kinase; ATM: ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (kinase); CK1, CK2: casein kinases 1 and 2, respectively; GSK3: Glycogen synthetase kinase-3; MAP3K: MAPK kinase kinase; PKB, PKC: protein kinase B and C, respectively; PLK1: polo-like kinase 1; dash: confirmed phosphorylation was recorded by database though without the knowledge about the phosphorylating enzyme.</p><p>significantly and markedly higher in cases of non-template (lagging) DNA segments encoding ALPS+ (cf. Fig. 4c in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>]). These facts appeared to be interesting with respect to the observed predominant actions of mutator enzymes forming APOBEC3 family in extended non-template DNA of model bacteria and cancer cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref49">49</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref54">54</xref>]. Hence similar mutagenesis of oligonucleotide segments encoding actually phosphorylated ALPS+ could cause diminishing or loss of the corresponding phosphorylation or even exchange (cf. FCRP in chapter 2) of regulating phosphorylating enzyme. As well known such events sometimes lead to carcinogenesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref9">9</xref>]. In addition, it is a question whether also the considered mutation changes of at least some frequent ATM-related ALPS+ can imitate consequences of ATM failure mentioned above and thus leading not only to cancer but also to premature aging [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref48">48</xref>]. In accordance with usual superior occurrence of HM* in segments of variable Ig genes encoding hypervariable regions 1 (CDR1), HM* occurred most frequently in ALPS+ encoded by nucleotide sequences similar to these CDR1. The twelve DNA segments encoding ALPS+ contained HM* whose specific change would directly remove phosphorylated serine from ALPS+.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Ig Domain Prehistory in the Focus of Conserved Domain Similarities</title><p>Higher plants represent Bikonta organisms. Consequently they differ from Unikonta group and its subgroup Opsithokonta including among others the taxonomic group of animals, i.e. Metazoa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref56">56</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref57">57</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref58">58</xref>], which frequently encode IgV in their genomes (cf. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref5">5</xref>]). Hierarchically, four types of similarities were distinguished in our search for Ig-domain-related sequences of higher plants. The sets of protein sequences achieving the first type of similarity, i.e. Ig-like similarity (determining broad fraction of Ig-like molecules), were differently restricted from sixteen types of BLAST records including items of reference sequences. These starting BLAST records were prepared with the help of four sophisticated multiple-sequence queries (MQ) defined in our previous papers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]. More precisely, MQ were composed of two groups of specifically restricted highly conserved IgV segments (two MQI) and two groups of IgV-like protein segments including ALPS++ mentioned in previous chapter (two MQP). The selection of the discussed Ig-like similarities from initial set of BLAST records was performed by means of 1) collection of item samples achieving superior similarities (top10) in the limited short BLAST records or 2) sixteen different combined strategies from sixteen types of large BLAST records called mega-records [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]. Mega-records were only slightly limited by Expect values containing approximately 280 thousands of items. The additional three types of similarities then actually represented the next step in the selection of Ig-like molecules. In this step, 1323 pre-selected Ig-like molecules were evaluated using CDD software by comparing selected molecules with classified conserved domains (for CDD see papers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref59">59</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref60">60</xref>]). The two types of superior conserved domain similarities differed only in the existence of a lower Expect (E) limit. While NRX similarities were closed from below, 0.01 ≤ E &lt; 4.605, NRI similarities were limited to only E &lt; 4.605. The corresponding upper Expect limit 4.605 was compromised with respect to a) the large evolutionary distances of the higher plants and Metazoa, and b) the minimum value of Expect allowing a significant rejection of the evaluated conserved domain similarities and in fact also corresponding to dense conserved domain similarities between fold length segments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]. Forty nine sequences achieving NRI similarities were found in our case. Nineteen of them were selected with help of MQP including sequences of ALPS++. Significant conserved domain similarities represented last type of the evaluated similarities. The Expect limit E* = 0.01 for these similarities, currently applied in the selected widely-used CDD program [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref59">59</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref60">60</xref>], was stricter than usual validity limit p &lt; 0.05. Hence this limit restricted significant probability p &lt; w(E*) = 0.0099502 ≈ E*. In addition, independently verified fold similarities (fifteen sequences) and contexts selected by the authors (five sequences) also played a role in the final selection of the presented data (for overall list of the selected twenty items see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> in the previous paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]).</p><p>Serine/threonine protein kinase ALE2 of Hevea brasiliensis origin (sequence ID XP_021662681.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref61">61</xref>]) containing a segment with significant conserved domain similarity to the vertebrate Ig1_Neogenin domain (sIg1N region at ALE2 positions 288-335) appeared to be the most interesting molecule in our study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]. The identified conserved Ig1_Neogenin domain of this molecule usually indicates mammalian proteins involved in neurodegenerative processes, i.e. processes absent in plants. Since neurodegenerative processes in mammalians are associated with aging, we can ask whether this domain can also participate in aging processes in plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]. In addition to the observed significant similarity, there were four additional conserved Ig domain similarities at the NRX level and thirteen other such Ig similarities with Expect values in the interval 4.605 ≤ E &lt; 100 (interval close to the range of dense similarities with the length of secondary structures) all co-locating with sIg1N. The simultaneously searched BLAST similarities of sIg1N with IgV-like segments including ALPS++ covered or overlapped most of sIg1N (ALE2 positions 292 - 303 and 305 - 335) were relatively weak (11.9 - 20.0 bits). Nevertheless, there were actually two repeating similarities with the same IgV-like segments including ALPS++ at ALE2 positions 305 - 328 and 329 - 359 (cf. web supplement of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]). The corresponding repeat-associated ALPS++ composed ATM-related segment of a human protein annotated with sequence ID AB056749.1 (“Up-regulated in liver cancer 1” protein, i.e. URLC1 described by Okabe (2004) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref38">38</xref>]). Similar co-localized occurrence of 1) NRI-similarities with conserved Ig domains and 2) similarities to IgV-like segments including ALPS++ were also found in the three cases of other molecules mentioned below (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Another significant conserved domain similarity comprising IG_FLMN (filamine Ig) domain was found in the gamete expressed 2 molecule (ID: XP_019237668.1). This similarity was overlapped by only slightly greater domain similarity with filamine and one NRX similarity with a bacterial Ig domain. The observed chimera of filamine and Ig domains appeared to be consistent with the data presented by Light (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref62">62</xref>] pointing to a possible common origin of filamines and immunoglobulins. In addition, significant conserved domain similarities of only bacterial Ig domains (simultaneously big_2 and BID_2) were found in the nuclear pore complex protein GP210 (ID: XP_010248630.1).</p><p>Among the molecules achieving NRX-level of conserved domain similarity with vertebrate conserved Ig domains and, at the same time, having required fold similarities, we have to mention first of all 1) molecule XP_010937019.2</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Some Ig-domain-related segments of higher plant origin</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Title/species/<sup> </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Conserved domains<sup>b</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Conserved domain similarities</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >AC-NRI<sup>d </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >HMMER as feedback<sup>e</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >clonal name<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >specification</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >access</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Score</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Expect</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >position<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >num</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >position</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Expect</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >WTG</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >nuclear pore com-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Big_2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pfam02368</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.04E−07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1154 - 1224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1149-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6E−13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacteroidetes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >plex protein GP210</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BID_2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >smart00635</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35E−04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1149 - 1224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9E−13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacteroidetes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nelumbo nucifera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BID_2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >smart00635</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1561 - 1646</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5E−16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacteroidetes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >XP_010248630.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref65">65</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Big_2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pfam02368</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >496 - 533</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >495 - 533</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9E−17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proteobacteria</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gamete expressed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Filamin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pfam00630</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.01E−05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92 - 222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2, i. X3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IG_FLMN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >smart00557</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92 - 228</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92 - 228</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9E−13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Archaea</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nicotiana attenuate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IG_FLMN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >smart00557</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.89E−03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >289 - 329</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 - 329</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2E−27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Insecta</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >XP_019237668.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref66">66</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Filamin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pfam00630</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.61E−03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224 - 324</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >**CoALIgdom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BID_1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >smart00634</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 - 316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8E−35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proteobacteria</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >STRK ALE2, i. X1<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >STKc_IRAK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd14066</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >312.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.38E−98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >765 - 1033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hevea brasiliensis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ig1_Neogenin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd05722</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.26E−03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288 - 335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288 - 335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5E−27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cnidaria</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >XP_021662681.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref67">67</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Atrophin-1 SF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cl26464</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.49E−19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 - 490</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >**CoALIgdom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PTKc_Src_like</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd05034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.57E−36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >763 - 961</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PTKc_VEGFR3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd05102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.05E−11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >763 - 961</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOC105056499</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ig1_IL1R_like</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd05756</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >228 - 267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.8E−13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aves</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Elaeis guineensis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >XP_010937019.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref68">68</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref69">69</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref70">70</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOC25498589</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DUF674</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cl04913</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >404.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.55E−138</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 - 445</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medicago truncatula</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IgV_H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >d04981</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299 - 353</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299 - 353</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mollusca</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >XP_013448976.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref71">71</xref>] **CoALIgdom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >potassium channel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ank_2 SF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cl26073</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >398.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45E−127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65 - 697</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KOR2-like i.X1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ig1_PVR_like</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd05718</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >633 - 650</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >604 - 655</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8E−16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amphibia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Musa acuminate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ig</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pfam00047</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >604 - 655</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9E−51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fungi</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >XP_018679675.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref72">72</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOC109149200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >STKc_IRAK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd14066</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >281.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13E−85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >505 - 770</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ipomoea nil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IGv</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >smart00406</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 - 106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7E−03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cyanobacteria</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >XP_019152409.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref73">73</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B_lectin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd00028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40E−37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 - 151</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PTKc_Src_like</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd05034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18E−37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >504 - 698</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PTKc_VEGFR3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd05102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.00E−11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1416 - 1589</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOC108207541</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-incomp_S1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pfam05938</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.96E−30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 - 137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Daucus carota</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ig5_Contactin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd05852</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67 - 109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7E−11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mollusca</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >XP_017233469.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref74">74</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref75">75</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LRR STRK RCH1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PLN00113 SF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cl26793</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >497.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.31E−159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 - 1075</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hevea brasiliensis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ig3_L1-CAML</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd05731</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429 - 457</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9E−31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fungi</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >XP_021677865.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref67">67</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PTKc_Src_like</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd05034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18E−28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >798 - 1066</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >**CoALIgdom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PTKc_VEGFR3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd05102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.04E−12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >797 - 1081</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G-type lectin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >STKc_IRAK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd14066</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >282.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.77E−89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >504 - 770</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-STRK At2g19130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IGv</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >smart00406</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 - 96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6E−07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrospira</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brachypodium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B_lectin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pfam01453</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09E−30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76 - 193</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >distachyon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PTKc_Src_like</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd05034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06E−28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >503 - 696</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >XP_010228837.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref76">76</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PTKc_VEGFR3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cd05102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.91E−09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >504 - 694</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>For additional description of plant Ig-domain-related segments see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]. **CoALIgdom: co-localized occurrence of 1) similarities with ALPS++ containing IgV-like segments (cf. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) and 2) conserved Ig domain similarities. <sup>b</sup>Together with the monitored conserved Ig domain similarities (Ig-cds), we show here maximum conserved domain similarity present in each molecule-related CDD record and the molecular maxima related to similarities of catalytic kinase domains STYK-CD mentioned in the chapter 3. For more detailed information about the displayed conserved domains see the special option in the menu on NCBI web page. <sup>c</sup>Pairs or triplets of restricted intervals present in grey elements - chimeras of co-locating recessive conserved Ig-cds and dominant non-Ig cds. <sup>d</sup>AC-NRI: numbers and group-related maximum edge positions of all reciprocally co-locating or (if the number is one) solely found Ig-cds, whose Expects achieved at least NRI level (i.e. E &lt; 4.605) mentioned in chapter 3. <sup>e</sup>We searched the maxima of HMMER-derived similarities between the selected Ig-domain-related segments of higher plant (Embryophyta) origin and the complementary set comprising sequences of all living organisms except for higher plants. WTG: well-known taxonomy group comprising species producing the most similar molecules restricted by HMMER searches; bold: Expect and taxonomy group of hot candidate segments for recent horizontal transfer (these segments were selected based on our empirical statistics; cf. the chapter 3 and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]).</p><p>with a segment close to Ig-domains of IL1-receptors (unique molecule selected by three independent methods and in addition exhibiting significant specificity of top non-chimerical NRX similarity with the corresponding Ig domain), 2) an XP_013448976.1 molecule with maximum similarity to the IgV-H domain and two other colocalized Ig domain similarities at the NRX level, 3) a potassium channel molecule XP_018679675.1 selected by two NRX-limited Ig domain similarities. The similarities of potassium channel sequences to Ig domains have so far been described in mammals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref63">63</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref64">64</xref>].</p><p>Furthermore, Kubrycht and Sigler (2020) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>] considered five molecules with an interesting context. Four of them formed chimerical similarities with vertebrate conserved Ig domains at the NRX level. This means that minor Ig-domain similarities were usually part of segments achieving more extensive dominant significant conserved domain similarities with non-Ig domains. This was the case for the dominant similarities with conserved domains of 1) B-lectins in molecules XP_019152409.1 and XP_010228837.1, 2) self-incomp_S1, i.e. domains causing so-called self-incompatibility preventing inbred pollination of plants (cf. XP_017233469.1 in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) and 3) leucine-rich-repeat-associated kinases PLN00113 (cf. RCH1 molecule with ID: XP_021677865.1). In the last case, PLN00113-related segment separately contained in its two different parts two differently similar subsegments. More precisely, this concerned a) a more N-terminally located subsegment similar to the Ig3_L1-CAML domain, and b) a subsegment simultaneously significantly similar to many catalytic conserved domains of STY-kinases including such Ig-domain-associated catalytic domains (these catalytic kinase domains are otherwise described in the three terminal paragraphs of this chapter). For further details regarding the description of the Ig-domain similarities mentioned here see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> (for the sequencing projects associated with the displayed sequence items see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref65">65</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref76">76</xref>] and NCBI database of protein sequences).</p><p>A feedback database projection of all Ig-domain related segments at the NRI similarity level was performed by Hidden Markov related HMMER and provided a bimodal frequency distribution within the scale of the logarithms of the corresponding Expect values (cf. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). In agreement with this bimodal (two-peak) distribution the Expect limitation (E &lt; E<sup>#</sup> = 10<sup>−</sup><sup>26</sup>) was derived based on inferior values of the peak comprising the values determining superior similarities. Four Ig-domain related segments displayed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> achieved the corresponding limited very high similarities (VHS). Due to unusually high similarity-related values of E<sup>#</sup>, these segments appeared to be hot candidates for products of recent horizontal transfer of genes or gene segments (cf. web supplement to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>] and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> in the same paper). As can be expected based on simple skeptic objections assuming horizontal transfer of Ig domains from the metazoans, VHS to metazoan proteins included both selected peptide segments forming significant conserved domain similarities to vertebrate Ig domains, i.e. segments of ALE2 and Gamete expressed 2. More precisely, these important VHS were indicated when comparing the Ig-domain related segments of ALE2 and Gamete expressed 2 with proteins of stony corals Pocillopora (primitive metazoans belonging to clade Cnidaria) and insect origin, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]. On the other hand, two selected HMMER-derived VHS to sequences of Fungi origin can be classified evolutionarily interesting with respect to future supplementary investigation of Ig-domain-related molecules in yet belittled clades of Opisthokonta [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref77">77</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref78">78</xref>]. These VHS were composed of already mentioned Ig-domain-related segments of the potassium channel and the RCH1 molecule (see the previous two paragraphs and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>An analysis of the sequences encoding multi-domain plant receptor/receptor-like kinases (RKs) provided also some orientation in the molecular evolution of signaling by cell-surface immune receptors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]. These 121 sequences were restricted with the help of Ig-like similarities described above. Concerning the relationship to ALPS++, majority of RKs (104 of 121 sequences) were selected with combinatory contribution of IgV-related sequences including ALPS++, i.e. using always one of two MQP mentioned above. Consistently with records of significant conserved domain similarities or the literature, majority or at least some of the selected RKs appeared to be involved in plant antiviral immunity, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref79">79</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref84">84</xref>]. In accordance with possible signaling role and name of RKs, their protein sequences frequently contained region or even regions achieving simultaneously many co-localized robust (extremely significant) conserved domain similarities with different model serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase catalytic domains (STYK-CD; cf. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref19">19</xref>]). This means that the corresponding plant protein segments of RKs represented common similarity regions (CSR) which gave evidence about their undiversified structure with respect of indicated familial group of STYK-CD (a superfamily subset). Consequently, the conserved domain similarities indicated a slowed down (or even frozen) evolution of STYK-CD-related segments in plants.</p><p>The domain group of model STYK-CD included representative subset of nine special conserved tyrosine kinase domains (with robust average domain similarities in the range of 60 - 120 bits), which were often associated with IgV (cdigvtk) forming joint peptide chains of metazoan proteins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>]. In accordance with our data, cdigvtk represented primarily a reasonably defined domain set due to their model-validated IgV association in primitive Metazoa and minimized redundancy of the domain set (cf. section 2.9 and Fig. 4 in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]). In 112 cases of the Ig-like RKs, these segments were significantly similar to at least one cdigvtk and in 102 cases to all nine cdigvtk. However, the other conserved domains than cdigvtk attained superior similarities with the STYK-CD-related segments of molecules from the set of RKs. This concerned mainly maximum similarities of CSR to conserved catalytic kinase domain associated with the interleukin 1 receptor (IRAK, i.e. cd14066; presented robust maximum mean bit score 286 bits) which occurred in 113 cases comprising CSR of 112 molecules participating in significant conserved domain similarities selected by cdigvtk. In accordance with the slowed down evolution of the STYK-CDs mentioned above, the dominantly similar IRAK could be assumed as a domain close to the molecular ancestor of STYK-CD, probably occurring earlier than the last common ancestor of plants and animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]. In addition, CSR of 118 RKs molecules, including CSR of 113 molecules significantly similar to IRAK, were significantly similar to the conserved domain of the leucine-rich-repeat-associated kinase PLN00113. The corresponding robust mean similarities with RKs were smaller than for IRAK but higher than for cdigvtk. However, certain segments immediately N-terminally adjacent to CSR of the compared plant sequences were sometimes also similar to PLN00113. Such very robust extended similarities in some cases exceeded 450 bits, which corresponded to an overall similarity much higher than any IRAK domain similarity. This fact, together with the more frequent occurrence of the significant CSR-related conserved domain similarities in the set of RKs mentioned above, could indicate the similarity of PLN00113 with the domain ancestor of STYK-CD even older than the considered ancestor close to IRAK (cf. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>]). This would explain the lower conserved domain similarity of CSR to PLN00113 than to IRAK as a consequence of higher phylogenic distance when assuming scarcely maintained original functional importance of the critical N-terminally adjacent segments in some cases of PLN00113-related sequences.</p><p>The apparently controversial point in terms of the evolutionary relationship between the discussed IgV-associated cdigvtk domains and Ig domains was noticed. This point consisted in the fact that the set of forty nine molecules achieving superior Ig domain NRI similarities comprised only six or seven molecules with significant conserved domain similarities to all cdigvtk or at least one cdigvtk, respectively. The corresponding fraction was therefore significantly and markedly lower than the already mentioned fractions of significant cdigvtk similarities in the case of the set of RKs. Perhaps we could still consider the possibility of 1) slowed down development of STYK-CD and thus also their slower gradual evolution of gene-gene interactions with Ig domain ancestors or 2) interesting but not yet verified alternative of evolution from ancestor structures resembling some Ig-domain-related subsegment of PLN00113 to Ig domains (cf. RCH1 mentioned above and in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Perspectives</title><p>The volume of sequence data and repertoire of the tools important for their processing keeps enlarging. In twenty years, super-smart computers can globally solve the problems we have listed here. Until then, however, we need to know a wide range of answers that will help physicians treat better and super-smart computers calculate, search or select better and more objectively.</p><p>We consider a more detailed study of the corresponding subset of cancer-related molecules to be a suitable for continuation of our effort. In this more detailed study, we would like to include the re-evaluation of selected segments using 1) database mapping of cancer-related mutations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref85">85</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref86">86</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref87">87</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref88">88</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref89">89</xref>], tumor neo-epitopes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref90">90</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref95">95</xref>] or other important relationships [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref96">96</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref97">97</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref98">98</xref>] and 2) prediction of cancer-driving sites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref99">99</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref100">100</xref>] or immunogenic epitopes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref101">101</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref107">107</xref>] comprising also more specific cancer related neo-epitopes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref108">108</xref>]. Based on literature data, the corresponding phylogenic studies could also include sequence sets of non-metazoan Unikonta (Amoebozoa, Apusomonadida, Breviata) more specifically evaluating non-metazoan Opisthokonta (including Fungi mentioned above). The reason for the proposed choice of the target organisms consists in the fact that a large number of early Ig domains and Ig-like segments occur in non-opisthokontal Unikonta, whereas structures close to IgV can be found in non-metazoan Opisthokonta [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref109">109</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref110">110</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref111">111</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref112">112</xref>] (see also <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and cf. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref113">113</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref120">120</xref>]). Due to our data and their statistical evaluation present in the preceding chapter and in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>], we assume that the corresponding future investigation could moreover expand to certain additional taxonomic groups of species than follows from literature. More precisely, this extension concerns yet not considered part of Neozoa representing close descendants of last common ancestor of higher plants and IgV-containing metazoans (cf. bottom branch following limiting dark brown division in the tree displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The</p><p>proposed taxonomy-based extensions of compared sequences would require a feasible usage of more invasive and specific search strategies than those used in our previous paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref14">14</xref>], when respecting the recent frames of taxonomy relationships following from taxonomic databases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref121">121</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref122">122</xref>] and recent knowledge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref77">77</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref123">123</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref130">130</xref>]. The possible relationships of at least some ALPS+ to aging have been also discussed here and in our last but one paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.116300-ref6">6</xref>]. We suppose that also this context of our investigation will meet with better bioinformatic and more specific factual background in this decade.</p><p>We also hope that at least some of our methodological procedures and approaches, described so far mostly in publication supplements (e.g. our BLAST-related evaluation of multiple sequence alignments, an approximation determining the specificity of conserved domain similarities and several contributions to odds ratio evaluations), will be made publicly available in the future. In addition, the important methodic question for future consists evidently in deeper structural description of the observed sequence relationships.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Authors gratefully acknowledge their families.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Kubrycht, J. and Sigler, K. (2022) Antibody-Like Phosphorylation Sites. Theme for Studies of Cancer, Aging and Evolution. Computational Molecular Bioscience, 12, 58-83. https://doi.org/10.4236/cmb.2022.121004</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.116300-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kubrycht, J. and Sigler, K. (1997) Animal Membrane Receptors and Adhesive Molecules. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 17, 123-147.  
https://doi.org/10.3109/07388559709146610</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kubrycht, J., Boreck&amp;#253;, J. and Sigler, K. (2002) Sequence Similarities of Protein Kinase Peptide Substrates and Inhibitors: Comparison of Their Primary Structures with Immunoglobulin Repeats. Folia Microbiologica, 47, 319-358.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02818689</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kubrycht, J. and Boreck&amp;#253;, J. (1998) Matrix Formalization for Simple Sequence Comparison and Visualization of Short Sequence Relationships. Imunologick&amp;#253; Zpravodaj, 27, 21-27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kubrycht, J., Boreck&amp;#253;, J., Sou&amp;#269;ek, P. and Je&amp;#382;ek, P. (2004) Sequence Similarities of Protein Kinase Substrates and Inhibitors with Immunoglobulins and Model Immunoglobulin Homologue: Cell Adhesion Molecule from the Living Fossil Sponge Geodia cydonium. Mapping of Coherent Database Similarities and Implications for Evolution of CDR1 and Hypermutation. Folia Microbiologica, 49, 219-246.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kubrycht, J., Sigler, K., R&amp;#367;&amp;#382;i&amp;#269;ka, M., Sou&amp;#269;ek, P., Boreck&amp;#253;, J. and Je&amp;#382;ek, P. (2006) Ancient Phylogenetic Beginnings of Immunoglobulin Hypermutation. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 63, 691-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-006-0051-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kubrycht, J., Sigler, K., Sou&amp;#269;ek, P. and Hude&amp;#269;ek, J. (2016) Antibody-like Phosphorylation Sites in Focus of Statistically Based Bilingual Approach. Computational Molecular Bioscience, 6, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4236/cmb.2016.61001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kubrycht, J., Sigler, K., Sou&amp;#269;ek, P. and Hude&amp;#269;ek, J. (2013) Structures Composing Protein Domains. Biochimie, 95, 1511-1524.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2013.04.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tram, E., Savas, S. and Ozcelik, H. (2013) Missense Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Altering the Phosphorylation Patterns of BRCA1 and BRCA2. PLoS One, 8, e62468. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062468</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Y., Cheng, H., Pan, Z., Ren, J., Liu, Z. and Xue, Y. (2015) Reconfiguring Phosphorylation Signaling by Genetic Polymorphisms Affects Cancer Susceptibility. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Biology, 7, 187-202.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjv013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, S., Menon, R., Poulos, R.C. and Wong, J.W.H. (2017) Proteogenomic Analysis Prioritises Functional Single Nucleotide Variants in Cancer Samples. Oncotarget, 8, 95841-95852. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21339</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, H.P., Ho, H.M., Chang, C.W., Yeh, S.D., Su, Y.W., Tan, T.H. and Lin, W.J. (2019) DUSP22 Suppresses Prostate Cancer Proliferation by Targeting the EGFR-AR Axis. The FASEB Journal, 33, 14653-14667.  
https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201802558RR</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, G., Weiner, H.L., Pederson, W.C., Davies, L. and Buchanan, E.P. (2019) Beta-Catenin Mutation with Complex Chromosomal Changes in Desmoid Tumor of the Scalp: A Case Report. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma &amp; Reconstruction, 12, 146-149.  
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676078</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, S., Wang, C., Zhou, J., Shi, Y., Ruan, C., Tu, Y., et al. (2021) EPSD: A Well-Annotated Data Resource of Protein Phosphorylation Sites in Eukaryotes. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22, 298-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz169</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kubrycht, J. and Sigler, K. (2020) Conserved Immunoglobulin Domain Similarities of Higher Plant Proteins. Computational Molecular Bioscience, 10, 12-44.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/cmb.2020. 101002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hanks, S.K., Quinn, A.M. and Hunter, T. (1988) The Protein Kinase Family: Conserved Features and Deduced Phylogeny of the Catalytic Domains. Science, 241, 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3291115</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirayama, T. and Oka, A. (1992) Novel Protein Kinase of Arabidopsis thaliana (APK1) that Phosphorylates Tyrosine, Serine and Threonine. Plant Molecular Biology, 20, 653-662. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046450</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rudrabhatla, P., Reddy, M.M. and Rajasekharan, R. (2006) Genome-wide Analysis and Experimentation of Plant Serine/Threonine/Tyrosine-Specific Protein Kinases. Plant Molecular Biology, 60, 293-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-005-4109-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Klaus-Heisen, D., Nurisso, A., Pietraszewska-Bogiel, A., Mbengue, M., Camut, S., Timmers, T., et al. (2011) Structure-Function Similarities between a Plant Receptor-Like Kinase and the Human Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinase-4. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 286, 11202-11210.  
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.186171</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stancik, I.A., &amp;#352;estak, M.S., Ji, B., Axelson-Fisk, M., Franjevic, D., Jers, C., et al. (2018) Serine/Threonine Protein Kinases from Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya Share a Common Evolutionary Origin Deeply Rooted in the Tree of Life. Journal of Molecular Biology, 430, 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2017.11.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blom, N., Gammeltoft, S. and Brunak, S. (1999) Sequence- and Structure-Based Prediction of Eukaryotic Protein Phosphorylation Sites. Journal of Molecular Biology, 294, 1351-1362. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1999.3310</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wong, Y.H., Lee, T.Y., Liang, H.K., Huang, C.M., Wang, T.Y., Yang, Y.H., et al. (2007) KinasePhos 2.0: A Web Server for Identifying Protein Kinase-Specific Phosphorylation Sites Based on Sequences and Coupling Patterns. Nucleic Acids Research, 35, W588-W594. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm322</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kubrycht, J. and Sigler K. (2008) Length of the Hypermutation Motif DGYW/ WRCH in the Focus of Statistical Limits. Implications for a Double-Motif or Extended Motif Recognition Models. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 255, 8-15.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.07.039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roberts, S.A. and Gordenin, D.A. (2014) Hypermutation in Human Cancer Genomes: Footprints and Mechanisms. Nature Reviews on Cancer, 14, 786-800.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3816</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dinkel, H., Chica, C., Via, A., Gould, C.M., Jensen, L.J., Gibson, T.J. and Diella, F. (2011) Phospho.ELM: A Database of Phosphorylation Sites—Update 2011. Nucleic Acids Research, 39, D261-D267. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gnad, F., Gunawardena, J. and Mann, M. (2011) PHOSIDA 2011: The Posttranslational Modification Database. Nucleic Acids Research, 39, D253-D260.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1159</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okazaki, N., Kikuno, R., Ohara, R., Inamoto, S., Hara, Y., Nagase, T., et al. (2002) Prediction of the Coding Sequences of Mouse Homologues of KIAA Gene: I. The Complete Nucleotide Sequences of 100 Mouse KIAA-homologous cDNAs Identified by Screening of Terminal Sequences of cDNA Clones Randomly Sampled from Size-Fractionated Libraries. DNA Research, 9, 179-188.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/9.5.179</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bayona-Bafaluy, M.P., Acín-Pérez, R., Mullikin, J.C., Park, J.S., Moreno-Loshuertos, R., Hu, P., et al. (2003) Revisiting the Mouse Mitochondrial DNA Sequence. Nucleic Acids Research, 31, 5349-5355. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg739</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Church, D.M., Goodstadt, L., Hillier, L.W., Zody, M.C., Goldstein, S., She, X., et al. (2009) Lineage-Specific Biology Revealed by a Finished Genome Assembly of the Mouse. PLoS Biology, 7, e1000112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000112</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steward, C.A., Humphray, S., Plumb, B., Jones, M.C., Quail, M.A., Rice, S., et al. (2010) Genome-Wide End-Sequenced BAC Resources for the NOD/MrkTac and NOD/ShiLtJ Mouse Genomes. Genomics, 95, 105-110.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2009.10.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Church, D.M., Schneider, V.A., Graves, T., Auger, K., Cunningham, F., Bouk, N., et al. (2011) Modernizing Reference Genome Assemblies. PLoS Biology, 9, e1001091.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001091</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maruyama, Y., Wakamatsu, A., Kawamura, Y., Kimura, K., Yamamoto, J., Nishikawa, T., et al. (2009) Human Gene and Protein Database (HGPD): A Novel Database Presenting a Large Quantity of Experiment-Based Results in Human Proteomics. Nucleic Acids Research, 37, D762-D766. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn872</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beausoleil, S.A., Jedrychowski, M., Schwartz, D., Elias, J.E., Villén, J., Li, J., et al. (2004) Large-Scale Characterization of HeLa Cell Nuclear Phosphoproteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 12130-12135. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404720101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Denoeud, F., Kapranov, P., Ucla, C., Frankish, A., Castelo, R., Drenkow, J., et al. (2007) Prominent Use of Distal 5’ Transcription Start Sites and Discovery of a Large Number of Additional Exons in ENCODE Regions. Genome Research, 17, 746-759.  
https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.5660607</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schmutz, J., Martin, J., Terry, A., Couronne, O., Grimwood, J., Lowry, S., et al. (2004) The DNA Sequence and Comparative Analysis of Human Chromosome 5. Nature, 431, 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02919</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kennedy, J.M., Fodil, N., Torre, S., Bongfen, S.E., Olivier, J.F., Leung, V., et al. (2014) CCDC88B is a Novel Regulator of Maturation and Effector Functions of T Cells during Pathological Inflammation. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 211, 2519-2535. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20140455</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Distler, U., Schmeisser, M.J., Pelosi, A., Reim, D., Kuharev, J., Weiczner, R., et al. (2014) In-Depth Protein Profiling of the Postsynaptic Density from Mouse Hippocampus Using Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics. Proteomics, 14, 2607-2613. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201300520</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bosserhoff, A.K., Moser, M. and Buettner, R. (2004) Characterization and Expression Pattern of the Novel MIA Homolog TANGO. Gene Expression Patterns, 4, 473-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modgep.2003.12.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okabe, H., Furukawa, Y., Kato, T., Hasegawa, S., Yamaoka, Y. and Nakamura, Y. (2004) Isolation of Development and Differentiation Enhancing Factor-like 1 (DDEFL1) as a Drug Target for Hepatocellular Carcinomas. International Journal of Oncology, 24, 43-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Albrecht, D.E. and Froehner, S.C. (2004) DAMAGE, a Novel Alpha-Dystrobrevin-Associated MAGE Protein in Dystrophin Complexes. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279, 7014-7023. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M312205200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chae, T.H., Allen, K.M., Davisson, M.T., Sweet, H.O. and Walsh, C.A. (2002) Mapping of the Mouse hyh Gene to a YAC/BAC Contig on Proximal Chromosome 7. Mammalian Genome, 13, 239-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-001-2144-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Terman, B.I., Carrion, M.E., Kovacs, E., Rasmussen, B.A., Eddy, R.L. and Shows, T.B. (1991) Identification of a New Endothelial Cell Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase. Oncogene, 6, 1677-1683.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stagni, V., Cirotti, C. and Barilà, D. (2018) Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated Kinase in the Control of Oxidative Stress, Mitochondria, and Autophagy in Cancer: A Maestro with a Large Orchestra. Frontiers in Oncology, 8, Article No. 73.  
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shiloh, Y. (2020) The Cerebellar Degeneration in Ataxia-Telangiectasia: A Case for Genome Instability. DNA Repair, 95, Article ID: 102950.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102950</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stagni, V., Ferri, A., Cirotti, C. and Barilà, D. (2021) ATM Kinase-Dependent Regulation of Autophagy: A Key Player in Senescence? Frontiers in Cellular and Developmental Biology, 8, Article ID: 599048. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.599048</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barzilai, A., Rotman, G. and Shiloh, Y. (2002) ATM Deficiency and Oxidative Stress: A New Dimension of Defective Response to DNA Damage. DNA Repair, 1, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1568-7864(01)00007-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crawford, T.O., Skolasky, R.L., Fernandez, R., Rosquist, K.J. and Lederman, H.M. (2006) Survival Probability in Ataxia Telangiectasia. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 91, 610-611. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.094268</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boohaker, R.J. and Xu, B. (2014) The Versatile Functions of ATM Kinase. Biomedical Journal, 37, 3-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-4170.125655</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Choy, K.R. and Watters, D.J. (2018) Neurodegeneration in Ataxia-Telangiectasia: Multiple Roles of ATM Kinase in Cellular Homeostasis. Developmental Dynamics, 247, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.24522</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhagwat, A.S., Hao, W., Townes, J.P., Lee, H., Tang, H. and Foster, P.L. (2016) Strand-Biased Cytosine Deamination at the Replication Fork Causes Cytosine to Thymine Mutations in Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 2176-2181.  
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522325113</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haradhvala, N.J., Polak, P., Stojanov, P., Covington, K.R., Shinbrot, E. and Hess, J.M., et al. (2016) Mutational Strand Asymmetries in Cancer Genomes Reveal Mechanisms of DNA Damage and Repair. Cell, 164, 538-549.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.050</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoopes, J.I., Cortez, L.M., Mertz, T.M., Malc, E.P., Mieczkowski, P.A. and Roberts S.A. (2016) APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B Deaminate the Lagging Strand Template During DNA Replication. Cell Reports, 14, 1273-1282.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morganella, S., Alexandrov, L.B., Glodzik, D., Zou, X., Davies, H., Staaf, J., et al. (2016) The Topography of Mutational Processes in Breast Cancer Genomes. Nature Communications, 7, Article ID: 11383. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11383</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Seplyarskiy, V.B., Soldatov, R.A., Popadin, K.Y., Antonarakis, S.E., Bazykin, G.A. and Nikolaev, S.I. (2016) APOBEC-Induced Mutations in Human Cancers Are Strongly Enriched on the Lagging DNA Strand during Replication. Genome Research, 26, 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.197046.115.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saini, N. and Gordenin, D.A. (2020) Hypermutation in Single-Stranded DNA. DNA Repair, 91-92, Article ID: 102868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102868</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Derelle, R., Torruella, G., Klime&amp;#352;, V., Brinkmann, H., Kim, E., Vl&amp;#269;ek, &amp;#268;., et al. (2015) Bacterial Proteins Pinpoint a Single Eukaryotic Root. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, E693-E969.  
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420657112.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Plattner, H. and Verkhratsky, A. (2015) The Ancient Roots of Calcium Signalling Evolutionary Tree. Cell Calcium, 57, 123-132.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2014.12.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beckmann, L., Edel, K.H., Batisti&amp;#269;, O. and Kudla, J. (2016) A Calcium Sensor-Protein Kinase Signaling Module Diversified in Plants and is Retained in All Lineages of Bikonta Species. Science Reports, 6, Article No. 31645.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31645</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Plattner, H. (2018) Evolutionary Cell Biology of Proteins from Protists to Humans and Plants. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 65, 255-289.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12449</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marchler-Bauer, A., Panchenko, A.R., Shoemaker, B.A., Thiessen, P.A., Geer, L.Y. and Bryant, S.H. (2002) CDD: A Database of Conserved Domain Alignments with Links to Domain Three-Dimensional Structure. Nucleic Acids Research, 30, 281-283.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.1.281</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marchler-Bauer, A., Derbyshire, M.K., Gonzales, N.R., Lu, S., Chitsaz, F., Geer, L.Y., et al. (2015) CDD: NCBI’s Conserved Domain Database. Nucleic Acids Research, 43, D222-D226. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1221</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, D., Deng, Z., Qin, B., Liu, X. and Men, Z. (2012) De Novo Assembly and Characterization of Bark Transcriptome Using Illumina Sequencing and Development of EST-SSR Markers in Rubber Tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.). BMC Genomics, 13, Article No. 192. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-192</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Light, S., Sagit, R., Ithychanda, S.S., Qin, J. and Elofsson, A. (2012) The Evolution of Filamin—A Protein Domain Repeat Perspective. Journal of Structural Biology, 179, 289-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2012.02.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fallen, K., Banerjee, S., Sheehan, J., Addison, D., Lewis, L.M., Meiler, J. and Denton, J.S. (2009) The Kir Channel Immunoglobulin Domain is Essential for Kir1.1 (ROMK) Thermodynamic Stability, Trafficking and Gating. Channels, 3, 57-68.  
https://doi.org/10.4161/chan.3.1.7817</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yereddi, N.R., Cusdin, F.S., Namadurai, S., Packman, L.C., Monie, T.P., Slavny, P., et al. (2013) The Immunoglobulin Domain of the Sodium Channel β3 Subunit Contains a Surface-Localized Disulfide Bond that Is Required for Homophilic Binding. The FASEB Journal, 27, 568-580. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.12-209445</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ming, R., Van Buren, R., Liu, Y., Yang, M., Han, Y., Li, L.T., et al. (2013) Genome of the Long-Living Sacred Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.). Genome Biology, 14, Article No. R41. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-r41</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bohlmann, J., Stauber, E.J., Krock, B., Oldham, N.J., Gershenzon, J. and Baldwin, I.T. (2002) Gene Expression of 5-epi-Aristolochene Synthase and Formation of Capsidiol in Roots of Nicotiana attenuata and N. sylvestris. Phytochemistry, 60, 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9422(02)00080-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tang, C., Yang, M., Fang, Y., Luo, Y., Gao, S., Xiao, X., et al. (2016) The Rubber Tree Genome Reveals New Insights into Rubber Production and Species Adaptation. Nature Plants, 2, Article No. 16073. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.73</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Low, E.T., Alias, H., Boon, S.H., Shariff, E.M., Tan, C.Y., Ooi, L.C., et al. (2008) Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) Tissue Culture ESTs: Identifying Genes Associated with Callogenesis and Embryogenesis. BMC Plant Biology, 8, Article No. 62.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-8-62</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Uthaipaisanwong, P., Chanprasert, J., Shearman, J.R., Sangsrakru, D., Yoocha, T., Jomchai, N., et al. (2012) Characterization of the Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Gene, 500, 172-180.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2012.03.061</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, R., Ong-Abdullah, M., Low, E.T., Manaf, M.A., Rosli, R., Nookiah, R., et al. (2013) Oil Palm Genome Sequence Reveals Divergence of Interfertile Species in Old and New Worlds. Nature, 500, 335-339. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12309</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pecrix, Y., Staton, S.E., Sallet, E., Lelandais-Brière, C., Moreau, S., Carrère, S., et al. (2018) Whole-Genome Landscape of Medicago truncatula Symbiotic Genes. Nature Plants, 4, 1017-1025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0286-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lescot, M., Piffanelli, P., Ciampi, A.Y., Ruiz, M., Blanc, G., Leebens-Mack, J., et al. (2008) Insights into the Musa Genome: Syntenic Relationships to Rice and Between Musa Species. BMC Genomics, 9, Article No. 58.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-58</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoshino, A., Jayakumar, V., Nitasaka, E., Toyoda, A., Noguchi, H., Itoh, T., et al. (2016) Genome Sequence and Analysis of the Japanese Morning Glory Ipomoea nil. Nature Communications, 7, Article No. 13295.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13295</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iorizzo, M., Senalik, D.A., Grzebelus, D., Bowman, M., Cavagnaro, P.F., Matvienko, et al. (2011) De Novo Assembly and Characterization of the Carrot Transcriptome Reveals Novel Genes, New Markers, and Genetic Diversity. BMC Genomics, 12, Article No. 389. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-389</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iorizzo, M., Ellison, S., Senalik, D., Zeng, P., Satapoomin, P., Huang, J., et al. (2016) A High-Quality Carrot Genome Assembly Provides New Insights into Carotenoid Accumulation and Asterid Genome Evolution. Nature Genetics, 48, 657-666.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3565</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mochida, K., Uehara-Yamaguchi, Y., Takahashi, F., Yoshida, T., Sakurai, T. and Shinozaki, K. (2013) Large-Scale Collection and Analysis of Full-Length cDNAs from Brachypodium distachyon and Integration with Pooideae Sequence Resources. PLoS ONE, 8, e75265. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075265</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shalchian-Tabrizi, K., Minge, M.A., Espelund, M., Orr, R., Ruden, T., Jakobsen, K.S. and Cavalier-Smith, T. (2008) Multigene Phylogeny of Choanozoa and the Origin of Animals. PLoS ONE, 3, e2098. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002098</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tikhonenkov, D.V., Hehenberger, E., Esaulov, A.S., Belyakova, O.I., Mazei, Y.A., Mylnikov, A.P., et al. (2020) Insights into the Origin of Metazoan Multicellularity from Predatory Unicellular Relatives of Animals. BMC Biology, 18, Article No. 39.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-0762-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sakamoto, T., Deguchi, M., Brustolini, O.J., Santos, A.A., Silva, F.F. and Fontes, E.P. (2012) The Tomato RLK Superfamily: Phylogeny and Functional Predictions about the Role of the LRRII-RLK Subfamily in Antiviral Defense. BMC Plant Biology, 12, Article No. 229. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-229</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zorzatto, C., Machado, J.P., Lopes, K.V., Nascimento, K.J., Pereira, W.A., Brustolini, O.J., et al. (2015) NIK1-Mediated Translation Suppression Functions as a Plant Antiviral Immunity Mechanism. Nature, 520, 679-682.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14171</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calil, I.P. and Fontes, E.P.B. (2017) Plant Immunity against Viruses: Antiviral Immune Receptors in Focus. Annals of Botany, 119, 711-723.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gouveia, B.C., Calil, I.P., Machado, J.P., Santos, A.A. and Fontes, E.P. (2017) Immune Receptors and Co-Receptors in Antiviral Innate Immunity in Plants. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, Article No. 2139. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02139</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Teixeira, R.M., Ferreira, M.A., Raimundo, G.A.S., Loriato, V.A.P., Reis, P.A.B and Fontes, E.P.B. (2019) Virus Perception at the Cell Surface: Revisiting the Roles of Receptor-Like Kinases as Viral Pattern Recognition Receptors. Molecular Plant Pathology, 20, 1196-1202. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12816</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, X., Wang, X., Xu, K., Jiang, Z., Dong, K., Xie, X., et al. (2021) The Serine/Threonine/Tyrosine Kinase STY46 Defends against Hordeivirus Infection by Phosphorylating γb Protein. Plant Physiology, 186, 715-730.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bamford, S., Dawson, E., Forbes, S., Clements, J., Pettett, R., Dogan, A., et al. (2004) The COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) Database and Website. British Journal of Cancer, 91, 355-358. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601894</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, P.J., Chiu, L.Y., Lee, C.C., Yeh, Y.M., Huang, K.Y., Chiu, C.H. and Tang, P. (2018) mSignatureDB: A Database for Deciphering Mutational Signatures in Human Cancers. Nucleic Acids Research, 46, D964-D970.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1133</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tate, J.G., Bamford, S., Jubb, H.C., Sondka, Z., Beare, D.M., Bindal, N., et al. (2019) COSMIC: The Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer. Nucleic Acids Research, 47, D941-D947. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krassowski, M., Pellegrina, D., Mee, M.W., Fradet-Turcotte, A., Bhat, M. and Reimand, J. (2021) ActiveDriverDB: Interpreting Genetic Variation in Human and Cancer Genomes Using Post-Translational Modification Sites and Signaling Networks (2021 Update). Frontiers in Cellular and Developmental Biology, 9, Article ID: 626821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.626821</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, T., Ruan, S., Zhao, X., Shi, X., Teng, H., Zhong, J., et al. (2021) OncoVar: An Integrated Database and Analysis Platform for Oncogenic Driver Variants in Cancers. Nucleic Acids Research, 49, D1289-D1301.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakamura, Y., Komiyama, T., Furue, M., Gojobori, T. and Akiyama, Y. (2010) CIG-DB: The Database for Human or Mouse Immunoglobulin and T Cell Receptor Genes Available for Cancer Studies. BMC Bioinformatics, 11, Article No. 398.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-398</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, S., Chaudhary, K., Dhanda, S.K., Kumar, R., Kumar, S., Sehgal, M., et al. (2016) A Platform for Designing Genome-Based Personalized Immunotherapy or Vaccine Against Cancer. PLoS ONE, 11, e0166372.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166372</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olsen, L.R., Tongchusak, S., Lin, H., Reinherz, E.L., Brusic, V. and Zhang, G.L. (2017) TANTIGEN: A Comprehensive Database of Tumor T Cell Antigens. Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy, 66, 731-735.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-017-1978-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, J., Zhao, W., Zhou, B., Su, Z., Gu, X., Zhou, Z. and Chen, S. (2018) TSNAdb: A Database for Tumor-Specific Neoantigens from Immunogenomics Data Analysis. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics, 16, 276-282.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2018.06.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xia, J., Bai, P., Fan, W., Li, Q., Li, Y., Wang, D., et al. (2021) NEPdb: A Database of T-cell Experimentally-Validated Neoantigens and Pan-Cancer Predicted Neoepitopes for Cancer Immunotherapy. Frontiers in Immunology, 12, Article ID: 644637.  
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021. 644637</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, G., Chitkushev, L., Olsen, L.R., Keskin, D.B. and Brusic, V. (2021) TANTIGEN 2.0: A Knowledge Base of Tumor T Cell Antigens and Epitopes. BMC Bioinformatics, 22, Article No. 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-03962-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">He, Y., Racz, R., Sayers, S., Lin, Y., Todd, T., Hur, J., et al. (2014) Updates on the Web-Based VIOLIN Vaccine Database and Analysis System. Nucleic Acids Research, 42, D1124-D1132. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1133</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, P., Zhao, J., Lu, P. and Zhao, Z. (2017) mutLBSgeneDB: Mutated Ligand Binding Site Gene DataBase. Nucleic Acids Research, 45, D256-D263.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw905</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, R., Xu, H., Jia, P. and Zhao, Z. (2021) KinaseMD: Kinase Mutations and Drug Response Database. Nucleic Acids Research, 49, D552-D561.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa945</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ryslik, G.A., Cheng, Y., Cheung, K.H., Bjornson, R.D., Zelterman, D., Modis, Y. and Zhao, H. (2014) A Spatial Simulation Approach to Account for Protein Structure when Identifying Non-Random Somatic Mutations. BMC Bioinformatics, 15, Article No. 231. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-231</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, W., Yang, J., Wu, J., Cai, G., Zhang, Y., Haltom, J., et al. (2021) CanDriS: Posterior Profiling of Cancer-Driving Sites Based on Two-Component Evolutionary Model. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22, bbab131.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab131</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garcia-Boronat, M., Diez-Rivero, C.M., Reinherz, E.L. and Reche, P.A. (2008) PVS: A Web Server for Protein Sequence Variability Analysis Tuned to Facilitate Conserved Epitope Discovery. Nucleic Acids Research, 36, W35-W41.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn211</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stranzl, T., Larsen, M.V., Lundegaard, C. and Nielsen, M. (2010) NetCTLpan: Pan-Specific MHC Class I Pathway Epitope Predictions. Immunogenetics, 62, 357-368.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-010-0441-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tung, C.W., Ziehm, M., K&amp;#228;mper, A., Kohlbacher, O. and Ho, S.Y. (2011) POPISK: T-Cell Reactivity Prediction Using Support Vector Machines and String Kernels. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, Article No. 446. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-446</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oyarzún, P., Ellis, J.J., Bodén, M. and Kobe, B. (2013) PREDIVAC: CD4+ T-Cell Epitope Prediction for Vaccine Design that Covers 95% of HLA Class II DR Protein Diversity. BMC Bioinformatics, 14, Article No. 52.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-52</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Dimitrov, I., Atanasova, M., Patronov, A., Flower, D.R. and Doytchinova, I. (2016) A Cohesive and Integrated Platform for Immunogenicity Prediction. In: Thomas, S., Ed., Vaccine Design. Methods in Molecular Biology, Humana, New York, 761-770.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3389-1_50</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fleri, W., Paul, S., Dhanda, S.K., Mahajan, S., Xu, X., Peters, B. and Sette, A. (2017) The Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource in Epitope Discovery and Synthetic Vaccine Design. Frontiers in Immunology, 8, Article No. 278.  
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00278</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, S., Chen, J., Hong, P., Li, J., Tian, Y., Wu, Y. and Wang, S. (2020) PromPDD, a Web-Based Tool for the Prediction, Deciphering and Design of Promiscuous Peptides that Bind to HLA Class I Molecules. Journal of Immunological Methods, 476, Article ID: 112685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2019.112685</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, Z., Lyu, X., Wu, J., Yang, X., Wu, S., Zhou, J., et al. (2017) TSNAD: An Integrated Software for Cancer Somatic Mutation and Tumour-Specific Neoantigen Detection. Royal Society Open Science, 4, Article ID: 170050.  
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170050</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Popowicz, G.M., Müller, R., Noegel, A.A., Schleicher, M., Huber, R. and Holak, T.A. (2004) Molecular Structure of the Rod Domain of Dictyostelium Filamin. Journal of Molecular Biology, 342, 1637-1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hsu, S.T., Cabrita, L.D., Fucini, P., Dobson, C.M. and Christodoulou, J. (2009) Structure, Dynamics and Folding of an Immunoglobulin Domain of the Gelation Factor (ABP-120) from Dictyostelium discoideum. Journal of Molecular Biology, 388, 865-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.02.063</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirose, S., Chen, G., Kuspa, A. and Shaulsky, G. (2017) The Polymorphic Proteins TgrB1 and TgrC1 Function as a Ligand-Receptor Pair in Dictyostelium Allorecognition. Journal of Cell Science, 130, 4002-4012. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.208975</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Junqueira Alves, C., Yotoko, K., Zou, H. and Friedel, R.H. (2019) Origin and Evolution of Plexins, Semaphorins, and Met Receptor Tyrosine Kinases. Science Reports, 9, Article No. 1970. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38512-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Torruella, G., de Mendoza, A., Grau-Bové, X., Antó, M., Chaplin, M.A., del Campo, J., et al. (2015) Phylogenomics Reveals Convergent Evolution of Lifestyles in Close Relatives of Animals and Fungi. Current Biology, 25, 2404-2410.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.053</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burki, F., Kaplan, M., Tikhonenkov, D.V., Zlatogursky, V., Minh, B.Q., Radaykina, L.V., et al. (2016) Untangling the Early Diversification of Eukaryotes: A Phylogenomic Study of the Evolutionary Origins of Centrohelida, Haptophyta and Cryptista. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 283, Article ID: 20152802.  
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2802</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hug, L.A., Baker, B.J., Anantharaman, K., Brown, C.T., Probst, A.J., Castelle, C.J., et al. (2016) A New View of the Tree of Life, 2016. Nature Microbiology, 1, Article No. 16048. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hehenberger, E., Tikhonenkov, D.V., Kolisko, M., Del Campo, J., Esaulov, A.S., Mylnikov, A.P. and Keeling, P.J. (2017) Novel Predators Reshape Holozoan Phylogeny and Reveal the Presence of a Two-Component Signaling System in the Ancestor of Animals. Current Biology, 27, 2043-2050.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gitzendanner, M.A., Soltis, P.S., Wong, G.K., Ruhfel, B.R. and Soltis, D.E. (2018) Plastid Phylogenomic Analysis of Green Plants: A Billion Years of Evolutionary History. American Journal of Botany, 105, 291-301.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1048</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cavalier-Smith, T. (2018) Kingdom Chromista and Its Eight Phyla: A New Synthesis Emphasising Periplastid Protein Targeting, Cytoskeletal and Periplastid Evolution, and Ancient Divergences. Protoplasma, 255, 297-357.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-017-1147-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strassert, J.F.H., Jamy, M., Mylnikov, A.P., Tikhonenkov, D.V. and Burki, F. (2019) New Phylogenomic Analysis of the Enigmatic Phylum Telonemia further Resolves the Eukaryote Tree of Life. Molecular Biology of Evolution, 36, 757-765.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, L., Wang, S., Wang, H., Sahu, S.K., Marin, B., Li, H., et al. (2020) The Genome of Prasinoderma coloniale Unveils the Existence of a Third Phylum within Green Plants. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 4, 1220-1231.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1221-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Federhen, S. (2012) The NCBI Taxonomy Database. Nucleic Acids Research, 40, D136-D143. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1178</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schoch, C.L., Ciufo, S., Domrachev, M., Hotton, C.L., Kannan, S., Khovanskaya, R., et al. (2020) NCBI Taxonomy: A Comprehensive Update on Curation, Resources and Tools. Database, 2020, baaa062. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baaa062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lang, B.F., O’Kelly, C., Nerad, T., Gray, M.W. and Burger, G. (2002) The Closest Unicellular Relatives of Animals. Current Biology, 12, 1773-1778.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01187-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Torruella, G., Derelle, R., Paps, J., Lang, B.F., Roger, A.J., Shalchian-Tabrizi, K. and Ruiz-Trillo, I. (2012) Phylogenetic Relationships within the Opisthokonta Based on Phylogenomic Analyses of Conserved Single-Copy Protein Domains. Molecular Biology of Evolution, 29, 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr185</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suga, H., Dacre, M., de Mendoza, A., Shalchian-Tabrizi, K., Manning, G. and Ruiz-Trillo, I. (2012) Genomic Survey of Premetazoans Shows Deep Conservation of Cytoplasmic Tyrosine Kinases and Multiple Radiations of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases. Science Signaling, 5, ra35. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2002733</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paps, J., Medina-Chacón, L.A., Marshall, W., Suga, H. and Ruiz-Trillo, I. (2013) Molecular Phylogeny of Unikonts: New Insights into the Position of Apusomonads and Ancyromonads and the Internal Relationships of Opisthokonts. Protist, 164, 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2012.09.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cao, L., Chen, F., Yang, X., Xu, W., Xie, J. and Yu, L. (2014) Phylogenetic Analysis of CDK and Cyclin Proteins in Premetazoan Lineages. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 14, Article No. 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sebé-Pedrós, A., Degnan, B.M. and Ruiz-Trillo, I. (2017) The Origin of Metazoa: A Unicellular Perspective. Nature Reviews Genetics, 18, 498-512.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.21</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naranjo-Ortiz, M.A. and Gabaldón, T. (2019) Fungal Evolution: Major Ecological Adaptations and Evolutionary Transitions. Biological Reviews, 94, 1443-1476.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12510</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.116300-ref130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arroyo, A.S., Iannes, R., Bapteste, E. and Ruiz-Trillo, I. (2020) Gene Similarity Networks Unveil a Potential Novel Unicellular Group Closely Related to Animals from the Tara Oceans Expedition. Genome Biology and Evolution, 12, 1664-1678.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaa117</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>