Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis is an infectious agent that occurs in small ruminants causing caseous lymphadenitis, and more rarely in humans causing lymphadenitis and pneumonia. The breeding small ruminants have great economic importance in Brazil. Rural farm workers and veterinary students who acquired this disease suffered from weakening symptoms for weeks, and the identification of the etiological agent was time-consuming and complex. Due to the low prevalence of case records, there is probably no available commercial diagnostic kit for
C. pseudotuberculosis infection in humans. This study aimed to describe human seroreactivity to secreted antigens from
C. pseudotuberculosis. Reactivity of serum from farm workers (n = 14), individuals who work with the bacillus at laboratory (n = 8) or individuals without contact (n = 25) was tested with secreted proteins from PAT10 strain of
C. pseudotuberculosis by Western blotting. Samples of all (100%) farm workers showed reactivity to 31 kDa, 71 kDa and 164 kDa proteins, while laboratory workers showed 87.5%, 62.5 % and 37.5%, and no-contact 20%, 0% and 16%, respectively. All sera recognized the 275 kDa protein. Our data suggest that
C. pseudotuberculosis secreted proteins are antigenic in humans and the recognition profiles allowed the identification of individuals with and without prior contact with this bacillus. This is the first paper which describes human reactivity to
C. pseudotuberculosis in serum samples of workers in Brazil.
Human Immunoreactivity Antigenicity <i>Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis</i> Secreted Proteins Western Blot1. Introduction
Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis is a pleomorphic, gram-positive, facultative anaerobic and non-motile pathogen that causes pneumonia and lymphadenitis in humans [1] [2]. The first report of human infection by C. pseudotuberculosis was a 37-years-old man from Panama in 1966 with no known contact with small ruminants [3]. Since then, new infections have been reported in Australia, the United States, France, New Zealand, Belgium, Spain, Switzerland, China, the United Kingdom and Norway [1] [2] [4]. All of them reported direct or indirect contact with small ruminants or direct contact with the C. pseudotuberculosis. The infection is widely described in goats and sheep [5] and other small ruminants [2]. C. pseudotuberculosis is endemic in Brazil, including in northeastern states [6]. Human infection, as far as we know, has not yet been reported in Brazil.
Among the main symptoms of this infection in humans are inguinal lymphadenopathy or eosinophilic pneumonia with fever, pain, fatigue, malaise, globus sensation, dysphagia, and dry cough; and lymph node or lung biopsy analyzes from patients showed granulomatous, necrotizing non-specific inflammation without signs of malignancy, non-specific vasculitis, infiltrates of eosinophilic granulocytes and focal necroses [4] [7] [8].
Currently, the C. pseudotuberculosis infection diagnosis in humans is not commercially available. In the case reports described in the literature, patients are submitted to several diagnostic tests for various infections and treatments against the disease for several months without knowing the etiologic agent [1] [3] [4]. Besides that, the diagnosis as it has been carried out through invasive methods such as excision or puncture of affected lymph node followed by bacterial culture and biochemical or molecular processes [4], is considered complex. In this paper we describe the human seroreactivity to C. pseudotuberculosis and a simple method to identify this infection.
2. Methods2.1. Ethical Aspects
This project was approved by the Ethics Research Council of the Health Sciences Institute of the Federal University of Bahia. CAAE: 57018116.9.0000.5662.
2.2. Study Population
To meet the criteria for non reactivity inclusion with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the participants of the two groups had a tuberculin skin test (TST) (TST/PPD—Statens Denmark) and Interferon-γ release assay (IGRA/QTF-TB—Qiagen) negatives. In the study, the following groups were analyzed: Contact Group (CG)—composed of adult individuals who showed or referred a work history with small ruminants on a farm (n = 14) or with C. pseudotuberculosis in a microbiology laboratory of the Federal University of Bahia (n = 8); non-contact group (nCG)—composed of individuals who reported no contact with small ruminants or their raw meat and food derivatives, and without a clinical history of an infectious process characteristic of M. tuberculosis or C. pseudotuberculosis (n = 25).
2.3. Culture Conditions of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis
The strain PAT10 of C. pseudotuberculosis [9] from the bacterial culture collection of the Laboratory of Microbiology Applied to Biotechnology and Immunology (LAMABI) of the Federal University of Bahia was used. For protein secretion, the bacteria were cultured in 500 mL of brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (DIFCO) at 37˚C for 72 h [10].
2.4. Three-Phase Partitioning (TPP) of the Secreted Fraction of C. pseudotuberculosis Proteins
Purification and concentration of secreted proteins were performed according to the protocol by Paule et al. [10], with few modifications: after centrifugation and collection of the culture supernatant, ammonium sulfate (Synth, Brazil) was added and mixed. The pH was adjusted to 4.0 with HCl solution and then n-butanol was added. This mixture was stirred for 10 minutes and allowed to rest for 1 hour. The interfacial precipitation was collected, centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min, and the interfacial precipitation was collected again and dissolved in a small volume of 20 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4.
2.5. SDS-PAGE of Secreted Proteins of C. pseudotuberculosis
A polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with a 4% stacking gel and a 12% running gel was carried out in 0.124 M Tris, 0.96 M glycine, and 0.5% SDS, pH 8.3 migration buffer. The C. pseudotuberculosis excreted-secreted antigen was added to wells of 6.6 cm by 1 mm and subjected to a current of 15 milliamperes (mA) (Mini-protean—BioRad). The proteins were stained by silver (Amersham Biosciences). The electrophoretic migration pattern of the proteins was analyzed with Gel Analyzer 2010 software.
2.6. Western Blotting with Proteins of C. pseudotuberculosis
Secreted proteins were transferred to 0.45 μm nitrocellulose membranes (BioRad) in 25 mM Tris buffer with 192 mM glycine and 20% methanol, with a fixed voltage at 100 V for one hour. The membrane was stained with Ponceau-S (Vetec, Brazil), cut into strips, washed in sodium phosphate buffer 0.15 M with 0.05% Tween20 (SPB-Tween20) pH 7.2, and blocked with 5% dry skimmed milk in SPB-Tween20, overnight at 4˚C under shaking. The serum of CG and nCG participants was diluted 1:10 in SPB-Tween20 and incubated for 1 h at 37˚C. The membrane strips were washed four times and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-human IgG (Life technologies) diluted 1:250 for 1 h at 37˚C. After five washes the membrane strips were immersed in a developing solution (8 mL of methanol, 0.024 g of 4-Chloro-α-Naphthol (Sigma), 32 mL of SPB and 13.3 mL of hydrogen peroxide 37%) under shaking for about 50 min and rinsed with distilled water. The pattern of the bands was analyzed with Gel Analyzer 2010 software.
3. Results3.1. Electrophoretic Profile of Secreted Proteins of C. pseudotuberculosis on SDS-PAGE
Secreted proteins of C. pseudotuberculosis recovered by TPP revealed twenty-five proteins with a molecular mass ranging from 19 to 268 kDa, on the silver-stained 12% SDS-PAGE gel (Figure 1).
3.2. Reactivity of Human IgG to Secreted Proteins of C. pseudotuberculosis by Western Blotting
Serum reactivity of the individuals from the CG to C. pseudotuberculosis secreted
proteins showed a different profile than the one observed in the nCG by Western blotting (Figure 2(a)). The frequencies of bands with higher occurrences are shown in Figure 2(b).
It was observed in samples from the CG subgroup of farm workers, a higher frequency of approximately 31, 71, 164 and 275 kDa proteins (Figure 2(a)). Among the CG subgroup of laboratory workers samples, it was seen a higher frequency of approximately 31, 71 and 275 kDa proteins and a lower frequency of about 164 kDa protein (Figure 2(a)). On the other hand, in the samples of nCG group, it was observed the presence of 275 kDa protein was constant, with a lower frequency and intensity of 164 and 31 kDa proteins, and no occurrence of 71 kDa protein (Figure 2(a)).
4. Discussion
It was observed that CG participants sera showed reactivity with several proteins of C. pseudotuberculosis, highlighting the proteins with 31 kDa, 71 kDa, 164 kDa, and 275 kDa, which presented a frequency of 100% in the individuals that manipulated goats and sheep on the farm. The veterinary community knows the protein of approximately 31 kDa as phospholipase D (PLD), a molecule that gives high virulence and contributes to the pathogenicity of the C. pseudotuberculosis infection [11]. The protein with a molecular weight close to 71 kDa is described as neuraminidase H (NanH) or extracellular sialidase and is related to bacterial growth and pathogenicity through the recognition of sialic acid residue in host cells, also found in other species like C. ulcerans and C. diphtheria [9] [12] [13]. Despite this correlation, further analysis must be done to confirm the protein identity of these bands. References to proteins at 164 kDa and 275 kDa were not found, requiring a biochemical analysis to characterize them.
The protein of approximately 71 kDa was reactive exclusively with the samples of CG individuals, not appearing in nCG ones. A nearby band of about 75 kDa was found by Join-lambert et al. [11] when they performed a Western blotting serological reactivity test to diagnose the cause of necrotizing lymphadenitis in a 12-year-old child who had contact with sheep. These findings may indicate that this protein has high immunogenicity and can differentiate, in the serological test, individuals who had and who had no contact with C. pseudotuberculosis.
In the last decades, several studies carried out in Brazil evidenced the reactivity of infected goats and sheep against C. pseudotuberculosis antigens prepared in the laboratory. Vale et al. [14] found reactivity of goat sera with these bacteria proteins between 21 kDa to 92 kDa, including 31.5 kDa and 72 kDa. In another work with naturally infected animals, the 31 kDa and 72 kDa proteins were also found [15]. In Germany, a group of researchers testing C. pseudotuberculosis antigens in sera from animals with caseous lymphadenitis identified proteins close to 71 kDa with 70% frequency in sheep and 100% in goats, and proteins close to 31 kDa with a rate of 71% in sheep and 100% in goats [16].
In this work, all individuals of the nCG showed reactivity with protein of 275 kDa. Also were found four sera that showed reactivity with a protein of approximately 164 kDa and, five sera that reacted with a protein of about 31 kDa. These reactivities may result from a cross-reaction of proteins conserved in other bacteria that individuals may have come into contact with, or possible contact with C. pseudotuberculosis, unknown to the participant, as occurred in a Panamanian man in 1965 [3].
In the descriptive analysis from the protein profile of the purified extract of C. pseudotuberculosis PAT10 strain were found 25 proteins in 12% SDS-PAGE stained with silver salts. Several of these proteins were described in studies of different research groups, with more reference to the proteins between 19 and 94 kDa [10] [14] [15] [16]. These studies were performed using other strains than the one used in our study, where 11 proteins above 100 kDa were found. The variation in the number of proteins found in other papers may be due to the number of microorganisms collected for bacterial growth, media volume or the staining method used, once silver nitrate staining is 100 times more sensitive than the Coomassie blue used by many researchers [6].
In the current socio-geographical context of infection by C. pseudotuberculosis of small ruminants in northeastern Brazil, and the consequent handling by workers that come in contact with these animals, or in the laboratory sector with the manipulation of this pathogenic bacteria, of biological risk NB-2, there is a current demand for infection serological diagnosis in the occupational environment. Its current inexistence is possibly due to the absence of studies aimed at the identification of specific antigenic molecules for human infection. The existence of an immunodiagnostic test, less invasive method if compared to those described in the literature for human [1] [4] [7], may allow epidemiological and occupational studies, besides making the infectology specialty care more efficient. Despite not being a prevalent disease in the general population, the potential risk, although low and preventable, by biosafety measures, for the worker and for the consumers of contaminated meat and derivatives, can have an advance in the diagnosis, with more vision of the one health that should be a goal for everyone.
The professional risk for rural farm workers may reside mainly in the deficient biosafety in the routine activities handling and slaughter infected animals and contaminated products. The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) such as goggles, mask, cap, lab coat, gloves, pants, overalls and boots is essential to prevent contamination by C. pseudotuberculosis in livestock activity or working at laboratory with the bacillus. As seen reactivity here in this study population and as referred to in articles dealing with human infection in localities with these diseases in small ruminants. There are also reports of infection by consumers of raw milk and meat from infected animals [2] [17], and boiling or good cooking of these foods must be practiced, preventing the entry of viable bacilli.
5. Conclusions
C. pseudotuberculosis secreted proteins are antigenic for human sera. The electrophoretic profile of the proteins recognized in western blotting by the sera of individuals with C. pseudotuberculosis contact or with infected animals differs from the individuals without these contacts.
Further studies should be performed for identification and production of 31 kDa and especially 71 kDa proteins as they are potential indicators of C. pseudotuberculosis infection and can be used as a diagnostic tool.
Acknowledgements
We thank Sérgio Daltro, Paulo Daltro, the management and staff of Fazenda Casa Nova in Iaçu/BA—Brazil, and all who participated as volunteers in this project.
This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.
Ethics Approval Statement
This project was approved by the Ethics Research Council of the Health Sciences Institute of the Federal University of Bahia. CAAE: 57018116.9.0000.5662.
Funding Statement
This work counted on all the necessary reagents that came from researches of the group of the Laboratory of Immunology and Molecular Biology (Laboratório de Imunologia e Biologia Molecular—LABIMUNO) with residual resources of projects in the phase of conclusion and concluded.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Cite this paper
dos Santos, R.M., Cerqueira, S.M.A., Andrade, C.L.B., Müller, G.S., de Menezes Santos, V.C., Araújo, H., Queiroz, S., Conceição, R.R., Oliveira, L.G.F., Borges, M.R., Marchioro, S., de Moura-Costa, L.F., de Sousa, F.S.C., da Conceição Aquino de Sá, M., Filho, J.T.R.R., Trindade, S.C., Netto, E.M., Meyer, R. and Freire, S.M. (2022) Human Seroreactivity to Secreted Molecules of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. Advances in Microbiology, 12, 150-158. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2022.123012
ReferencesPaule, B.J.A., Meyer, R., Moura-Costa, L.F., et al. (2004) Three-Phase Partitioning as an Efficient Method for Extraction/Concentration of Immunoreactive Excreted-Secreted Proteins of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. Protein Expression and Purification, 34, 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2003.12.003Join-Lambert, F.O., Ouache, M., Canioni, D., et al. (2006) Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Necrotizing Lymphadenitis in a Twelve-Year-Old Patient. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 25, 848-851. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000234071.93044.77Seyffert, N., Silva, F.R., Jardin, J., et al. (2014) Serological Proteome Analysis of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Isolated from Different Hosts Reveals Novel Candidates for Prophylactics to Control Caseous Lymphadenitis. Veterinary Microbiology, 174, 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.08.024Trost, E., Ott, L., Schneider, J., et al. (2010) The Complete Genome Sequence of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis FRC41 Isolated from a 12-Year-Old Girl with Necrotizing Lymphadenitis Reveals Insights into Gene-Regulatory Networks Contributing to Virulence. BMC Genomics, 11, 728. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-728Vale, V., Freire, S., Ribeiro, M., Regis, L., Bahia, R., Carminati, R. and Meyer, R. (2003) Reconhecimento de antígenos por anticorpos de caprinos naturalmente infectados ou imunizados contra Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. Revista de Ciências Médicas e Biológicas, 2, 192-200. https://doi.org/10.9771/cmbio.v2i2.4286Rebouas, M.F., Loureiro, D., Bastos, B.L., Moura-Costa, L.F., Hanna, S.A., Azevedo, V. and Portela, R.W. (2013) Development of an Indirect ELISA to Detect Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Specific Antibodies in Sheep Employing T1 Strain Culture Supernatant as Antigen. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 33, 1296-1302. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2013001100002Hoelzle, L.E., Scherrer, T., Muntwyler, J., Wittenbrink, M.M., Philipp, W. and Hoelzle K. (2013) Differences in the Antigen Structures of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and the Induced Humoral Immune Response in Sheep and Goats. Veterinary Microbiology, 164, 359-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.02.031Goldberger, A.C., Lipsky, B.A. and Plorde, J.J. (1981) Suppurative Granulomatous Lymphadenitis Caused by Corynebacterlumovis (Pseudotuberculosis). American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 76, 486-490. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/76.4.486Cerdeira, L.T., Pinto, A.C., Schneider, M.P.C., et al. (2011) Whole-Genome Sequence of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis PAT10 Strain Isolated from Sheep in Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Bacteriology, 193, 6420-6421. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.06044-11Keslin, M.H., McCoy, E.L., McCusker, J.J. and Lutch, J.S. (1979) Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis: A New Cause of Infectious and Eosinophilic Pneumonia. The American Journal of Medicine, 67, 228-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(79)90395-4Thomas, B., Helmut, O. and Werner, Z. (1997) Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Infection in a Butcher. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 3, 696-698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.1997.tb00482.xSwitzer III, R.C., Merril, C.R. and Shifrin, S. (1979) A Highly Sensitive Silver Stain for Detecting Proteins and Peptides in Polyacrylamide Gels. Analytical Biochemistry, 98, 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(79)90732-2Meyer, R., Carminati, R., Cerqueira, R.B., et al. (2002) Avaliaão da resposta imune humoral em caprinos inoculados com uma vacina viva atenuada liofilizada contra Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. Revista de Ciências Médicas e Biológicas, 1, 42-48. https://doi.org/10.9771/cmbio.v1i1.4093Heggelund, L., Gaustad, P., Håvelsrud, O.E., et al. (2015) Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Pneumonia in a Veterinary Student Infected during Laboratory Work. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2, ofv053. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofv053Lopez, J.F., Wong, F.M. and Quesada, J. (1966) Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. First Case of Human Infection. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 46, 562-567. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/46.5.562Bastos, B.L., Portela, R.W.D., Dorella, F.A., et al. (2012) Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis: Immunological Responses in Animal Models and Zoonotic Potential. Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology, 4, 5.Peel, M.M., Palmer, G.G., Stacpoole, A.M. and Kerr, T.G. (1997) Human Lymphadenitis Due to Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis: Report of Ten Cases from Australia and Review. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 24, 185-191. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/24.2.185