The fly ash used in this work comes from the thermal power of the Chemical Industries of Senegal in Thies region (Figure 1). Fly ash is a fine grey powder and is the principal by-product generated during coal combustion process. It has an absolute density of 2.4 g/cm³.

The lime, as an important material used in the building construction, has an apparent density varying between 0.6 and 0.75 g/cm³ while its absolute density is in the range of 2.6 and 2.9 g/cm³.

Samples were weighed and then introduced in oven at 105˚C for 24 h to remove moisture prior to the preparation of pellets made by mixing them with 10 wt% of a binder called Licowax [17] [18].

We use several mixtures by combining fly ash and lime at different proportion (Table 1).

The obtained mixture was homogenized in a mortar and the technology press VANEOX FLUXANA considering a force of 10 N on a surface of a disk of a radius of 11 mm was used to form the pellets. After obtaining the pellets, we used an X-ray portable fluorescence Niton XLT900s (P-XRF) for our X-ray analyzes with a measurement time of 350 s.

XRF was performed with 100% normalization and full fundamental parameter quantification techniques: see Table 2 for specification and operating conditions.

The experimental methods used for the physical and chemical characterization of ashes are shown in Table 3 [14] [19]. It also gives the experimental program concerning the study of the activity of FA in lime-based materials.

For the thermal test, the hot plate transient method was used in an asymmetrical configuration to determine simultaneously the thermal conductivity and thermal effusivity of samples [20]. The different elements that make up the experimental device are represented in Figure 2 as follows.

A portable XRF device Niton XLT900s was used to analyze the chemical composition of the ashes in terms of major and minor elements (Table 4). Oxides are the major elements and are expressed in%, while the minor elements are given in mg/kg (ppm).

The chemical analysis of the fly ash of the Chemical Industries of Senegal using X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy showed that it contained the pozzolanic material SiO₂, Al₂O₃ and Fe₂O₃. It is known that these oxides compose the reactive part of pozzolanic materials [21] [22]. The sum of SiO₂, Al₂O₃ and Fe₂O₃ represent more than 70% of FA. So this fly ash is in Class F Fly ashes based on the standard classification [23]. ASTM 618 C classifies fly ash chemically and by coal rank. Class F fly ash content is at least 70% by weight of SiO₂ + Al₂O₃ + Fe₂O₃ and are typically the product of burning high rank coals (bituminous and anthracite).

Class C Fly ashes contain a minimum of 50% by weight of SiO₂ + Al₂O₃ + Fe₂O₃ and a cementitious component, and are normally a product of burning low rank coal (lignite and sub bituminous).

So the Fly ash used in this study is bituminous and we list the work from other different authors in order to give a comparative asset in term of elemental composition with the samples we have used Table 5.

From the chemical analysis of the coal ashes, it is obvious that some elements fingerprint the different regional geological settings between coal fly ash. Thus, the ash of bituminous coal from the Chemical Industries of Senegal shows lower

concentrations of Al than the other ashes. The chemical composition of bituminous coal ashes from literature data compared in Table 5 shows that the other elements are in the same range. Clearly, the results of the present work are in agreement with these data. As concerns the concentrations of the main ash oxides in the mixtures, they vary between the values corresponding to the individual ashes, but not proportionally [26]. The similarity of these ashes with ours is important to highlight as they are both used in the processing of cement and concrete. Indeed, our ashes show some similarities with one type of cement in Senegal having the following chemical composition: SiO₂ (19.53), Al₂O₃ (7.12), Fe₂O₃ (2.22), CaO (65.5) [27]. This suggests that the coal fly ash presented in this work may be used in civil engineering.

To assess the hydraulic and pozzolanic activity of FA, several mixtures: FA with water and FA with lime and water were prepared and analysed using XRD and mechanical behavior (Table 6).

The mineralogical characterization was carried out by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) using a PW1840 diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation operating at 30 mA and 40 kV.

The analysis was done in the continuous scanning mode with a speed of 0.05˚ per second within the range of 10˚ ≤ 2θ ≤ 70˚. The diffractometer is linked to a computer equipped with APD software. For data processing we used X Pert High Score software.

Figure 3 shows the diffractogram of lime. The phases identified in lime are portlandite and calcite. Portlandite comes from the slaking of lime. The presence of calcite could be due to the carbonation of porlandite due to its exposure to air.

The diffractogram of the fly ash shows the existence of a complex polyphasic material composed of several crystalline phases and a glass phase [28].

Besides glass, the main minerals identified are quartz (SiO₂), anhydrite (CaSO₄)

and calcium aluminium oxide (Ca₃Al₂O₆) and minor phases (Figure 4).

Quartz is the most common mineral, it is found in ash, cement, and sand. CaSO₄ anhydrite is similar to less dense and softer gypsum. It is used as retardant in Portland cement clinker. Gypsum, hydrated anhydrite is a mineral added to clinker to form cement Portland. It reacts with calcium aluminates in order to regulate the setting by forming ettringite (Ca₆Al₂(SO₄)₃(OH)₁₂·26H₂O). Its presence in the ashes is beneficial because we have more need to add it to form a binder based on ash and hydrated lime.

In contact with water, tricalcium silicates (Ca₃SiO₅) and dicalcium silicates (Ca₂SiO₄) dissolve in the form of ions. These interact with each other and form hydrated calcium silicates (C-S-H) and portlandite (Ca(OH)₂) Figure 5. These reactions give off a lot of heat, so they are exothermic and can act as a catalyst for the hydration reaction. In the case of C₂S, the hydration kinetics are slower and so is the amount of Portlandite formed. The strength of a binder is due to the entanglement of the C-S-H gel. The C-S-H develop on the surface of the

grains of the non-hydrated binder and gradually fill in the capillary interstices between the grains. This slows down, after a few hours, the diffusion of ions and water to the anhydrous components of the system. In our binder, a small amount of hydrated calcium silicate was observed on the binder L₃ at 28 days. This weakness could be due to the non-presence of these silicates in our ash [29].

The carbonation of lime is due to the reaction of two compounds: 1) CO₂ from the atmosphere, and 2) the calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂. First, CO₂ dissolves in the water of the pores forming carbonate ions. Then, these carbonate ions can react with the Ca ions of the pore solution leading to calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) precipitation. The CaCO₃ coming from the carbonation of other hydration products and/or anhydrous silicates and aluminates phases [30].

We show the compressive strengths of mortars according to age with the samples we have used Figure 6.

At 100% (L₅) of fly ash at 3 days (COM3d) we have very low resistance compared to others formulations. The hydration of the ash alone has not given a new phase that participates in compression resistance. In this case we can say that only ashes cannot be taken as binders even if their resistance increases over time. And they also have a weak hydraulic character.

When the percentage of ash is low, the amount of silica, alumina and gypse is not sufficient to react with calcium hydroxide. This is the origin of the low resistance observed for sample L₁.

As the percentage of ash increases, compression resistance increases, which shows that there are new phases formed that are responsible for the strength of the binders L₂, L₃ and L₄ binders of the material.

We also note that between 40% and 80% (L₃, L₂ and L₁) of lime in the mixtures with fly ash, we have a drop in resistance. This proves that the greater the quantity of lime, the less we have good resistance in this interval. So in the presence of lime, the fly ash reacts and hardens slightly so we can approve that our ashes have a power pozzolanic.

Mortar L₃ containing 60% of fly ash and 40% of lime has the greatest resistance at any age.

The setting start time measured with the Vicat apparatus is 5 h 20 min while for cement it is of the order of 2 h. There is therefore a delay in setting the binder which can be attributed to the presence of phosphorus and the non-negligible Zinc content because these elements are known as powerful cement retarders [31].

The presence of gypsum in the coal fly ash can also explain this delay in setting. In addition, the lime has a very slow start of setting which is 10 hours.

As for the tests on pure paste, the mortar containing 60% fly ash and 40% lime is used for this test.

We carried out a series of three tests on the material for more precision and we obtained the results reported in Table 7.

The results on thermal tests allowed us to obtain the thermal conductivity and effusivity of the binders.

The possible dangerousness of the ash depends essentially on their heavy metal content concerning the limits of regulated hazardous substances on one hand, and on the other hand of the overall ecotoxicity of the ash (criterion H14 of Directive 91/689/EEC).

In this Directive the material is toxic if its content in heavy metal is higher to some thresholds as defined in Annex III (Table 8).

Except for the Cr, all the heavy metal contents of these ashes are below the threshold concentration in Table 8, so the ashes cannot therefore be a priori considered dangerous on the basis of these criteria.

The classification of ashes can vary according to the criteria used, depending on the geographic location as well. However some researchers differ on the definition of toxicity of ashes. Some will put them in landfill if there are considered dangerous while others who consider them non-dangerous will value them.

Thus a study of the dangerousness of the ash is necessary to see their possible compatibility with the recovery in construction.