<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2022.102009</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-115557</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Contribution of Nutrients and Water Properties to the Carbonate System in Three Particular Areas of the Tropical Atlantic (NE-BRAZIL)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Leonardo</surname><given-names>Bertini</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elisabete</surname><given-names>de Santis Braga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Oceanographic Institute, University of S&amp;amp;#227;o Paulo, S&amp;amp;#227;o Paulo, Brazil</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>02</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>161</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2022</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Tropical waters show different regional aspects due to specificities in their nutrient biogeochemical cycles, which can affect the carbon system and influence their regional role as sinks or sources of CO
  <sub>2</sub>. This study was performed on particular tropical areas that present a different seasonal behaviour related to the carbon cycle observed in the late rainy season (July 2013). Understanding the CO
  <sub>2</sub> drawdown and outgassing potential in these areas is needed to call attention to more long-term monitoring efforts and protect understudied tropical coastal systems more efficiently. This study is focused on nutrient values, hydrological data, biogeochemical carbon behaviour linked to the carbonate system and includes estimates of CO
  <sub>2</sub> fluxes in three contrasting areas off the northeastern Brazilian shelf: 
  1
  ) an urbanised estuary (Recife-REC), 
  2)
   a coastal Island (Itamarac&#225;-ITA) and 
  3
  ) an oceanic archipelago (Fernando de Noronha-FN). In general, REC acted as a source, while ITA and FN as carbon sinks. In ITA, despite the high DIC and Total Alkalinity observed (mean ~2360 μmol&amp;#183;kg<sup>-1</sup>), the sink is associated with an effective cascading of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> associated with turbulent shallow waters coupled with biogenic removal of  and precipitation of CaCO<sub>3</sub> by coralline algae. FN acted as a sink, linked to minor decreases in Total Alkalinity (mean~2295 μmol&amp;#183;kg<sup>-1</sup>) influenced by ammonium-based primary production, nitrogen fixation and sporadic entrainment of nutrient rich waters in the upper thermocline. More studies in different western tropical Atlantic coastal systems can improve the knowledge of tropical shelf seas and their contribution to the ocean carbon budget under specific regional trophic regimes.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>N/P/Si Ratios</kwd><kwd> Total Alkalinity</kwd><kwd> CO2 Flux</kwd><kwd> Dissolved Inorganic Carbon</kwd><kwd> Trophic Conditions</kwd><kwd> Western Tropical Atlantic</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Recent cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> data from Friedlingstein et al. (2019) showed that around 25% of all anthropogenic carbon emissions (160 &#177; 20 GtC) had been taken up by the global ocean since the preindustrial era, i.e. from 1850 and 2019. The same study also showed that the average ocean sink has reduced over the last decade (from 2009 to 2018) to approximately 22.5% of anthropogenic emissions, highlighting the global ocean is losing its capacity to take up and store anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub>. As little as the human CO<sub>2</sub> footprint might seem (655 &#177; 65 GtC) compared to the total inventory of oceanic carbon ~40,000 GtC (Le Qu&#233;r&#233; et al., 2015; Ussiri &amp; Lal, 2017; Friedlingstein et al., 2019), marine ecosystems are already responding to the rise in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> levels. Increasing trends of acidification in the surface ocean and worldwide changes in the relative proportions of the chemical species that form the Dissolved Inorganic Carbon pool are being reported (DIC, i.e., the sum of [CO<sub>2(aq)</sub>], [ HCO 3 – ] and [ CO 3 2 − ]) (Winn et al., 1998; Bates, 2007; Bates et al., 2014).</p><p>Due to the dissociation of the carbonate system species, only CO<sub>2(aq)</sub> is directly related to air-sea exchange. The other 2 species, bicarbonate and carbonate ions ( HCO 3 – and CO 3 2 − , respectively), are proton acceptors and form the major acid-base system controlling seawater total alkalinity (TA) (Wolf-Gladrow et al., 2007). These DIC forms can participate in processes within the ocean, and be transported away from the regions of enhanced gas exchange (such as zones of deep water formation—a carbon sinking process known as the solubility pump), and are eventually removed by chemical precipitation with Ca<sup>2+</sup>/Mg<sup>2+</sup> or take part in biological processes such as carbon fixation into living tissue and calcification of rigid structures. The biogeochemical processes that remove C from the DIC pool into other compartments (e.g., particulate matter by assimilation, precipitation, mineralization) form a gradient between the surface and subsurface waters, enabling the action of carbonate and the biological pumps.</p><p>However, as more DIC enters the carbonate system due to anthropogenic pressure, pH lowers as a result of H<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> and HCO 3 – formation and their dissociations, leading to a decrease in seawater alkalinity by increasing the relative proportions CO<sub>2(aq)</sub> and HCO 3 – , whilst decreasing that of CO 3 2 − (Doney et al., 2009). These changes in the carbonate system’s ionic proportions result in the attenuation of the carbonate pump. This process is further affected by the synergic outgassing caused by sea surface warming, resulting in the weakening of the solubility pump as well. The overall outcome is a carbonate system shifted towards CO<sub>2(aq)</sub> formation and increased pCO<sub>2sw</sub> levels, leading to the global ocean losing its buffering and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> uptake capacities.</p><p>The buffering itself can be measured by the Revelle Factor (R), which is the ratio between the relative change in pCO<sub>2atm</sub> and the relative change in DIC. It indicates the percentage of increase in pCO<sub>2atm</sub> that is necessary to increase DIC by 1%. R usually varies from 8 to 15, for warm and cold waters respectively (Broecker et al., 1979; Egleston et al., 2010) and is given as:</p><p>R = ( p CO 2 atm / p CO 2 atm ) / ( Δ DIC / DIC ) (1)</p><p>where:</p><p>(∆pCO<sub>2atm</sub>/pCO<sub>2atm</sub>) is the instantaneous change in pCO<sub>2atm</sub>.</p><p>(∆DIC⁄DIC) is the instantaneous change in DIC.</p><p>Changes in CO<sub>2</sub> solubility linked to acidification and sea surface warming can also have cascading effects on calcification rates of marine calcifiers (Hutchins et al., 2007; Riebesell et al., 2000). The reduced contribution of CO 3 2 − to the DIC pool causes the shallowing of the lysocline (depth at which the aragonite saturation state—Ω<sub>ar</sub>—equals 1), resulting in habitat loss for mesopelagic calcifiers. Ω<sub>ar</sub> decreased on average 20% since the Industrial Revolution and was chosen as a threshold parameter for ocean acidification when a study by Rockstr&#246;m et al. (2009) defined planetary boundaries that, once trespassed, are not likely to be recovered. Ω<sub>ar</sub> is given as:</p><p>Ω ar = [ Ca 2 + ] [ CO 3 2 − ] / K s p a r (2)</p><p>where:</p><p>Ω<sub>ar</sub> is the aragonite saturation state.</p><p>[Ca<sup>2+</sup>] and [ CO 3 2 − ] are the concentrations of calcium and carbonate ions.<sub> </sub></p><p>Ksp<sub>ar</sub> is the solubility product constant for aragonite, which increases with increasing pressure and decreasing temperature.</p><p>Despite the broad consensus of how the excess of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> is impacting the oceans, little is known as to how specific marine systems are responding to such pressures in terms of local imbalances in the carbonate system and nutrient biogeochemical shifts. Regarding tropical regions, especially the Tropical Western Atlantic, regional observational studies regarding their role in the ocean carbon cycle are scarce. According to Schuster and Gruber (2012), the Equatorial Atlantic is a source of about 0.12 &#177; 0.04 Pg C∙yr<sup>−1</sup> to the atmosphere, agreeing with other studies that show the Tropical Atlantic is a source of CO<sub>2</sub> (Oudot et al., 1995; Takahashi et al., 2002; Takahashi et al., 2009; Landsch&#252;tzer et al., 2014). However, Schuster and Gruber (2012) highlight that their outgassing estimate is inferior to what it used to be during pre-industrial times, when it was twice as large. Results from Goyet et al. (1998) suggest that the superficial layers of the Tropical Atlantic have become weaker sources of CO<sub>2</sub> to the atmosphere. This decrease in the Equatorial Atlantic CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing is mainly attributed to the counteracting effect of anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> uptake by the Tropical Atlantic as described by Gruber et al. (2009).</p><p>While most studies suggest the Equatorial and Tropical Atlantic as overall CO<sub>2</sub> sources, recent studies show that the atmospheric balance can be shifted towards CO<sub>2</sub> uptake at regional scales due to particularities with respect to ocean circulation, significant freshwater inputs and salinity-driven subsidence of seawater parcels. A few examples include the Amazon River plume (Ternon et al., 2000; K&#246;rtzinger, 2003; Cooley &amp; Yager, 2006; Cooley et al., 2007; Lef&#233;vre et al., 2017), the subsidence of highly-saline (i.e. dense) lenses formed by increased evaporation (de Souza et al., 2013) as well as precipitation regimes which are associated with the migration of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) (Bonou et al., 2016). Furthermore, a recent study using pCO<sub>2</sub> trends has also highlighted how equatorial sectors of the Atlantic off north and northeastern Brazil are prone to shift towards CO<sub>2</sub> sink in areas far from the influence of the Amazon plume (Araujo et al., 2019).</p><p>Despite the increasing amount of evidence showing tropical seas as potential seasonal sinks of anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> and the fact that these areas are one of the most biogeochemically active in the oceans, regional estimates of CO<sub>2</sub>flux remain limited and bound to studies based on large-scale modelling approaches. This includes the northeastern Brazilian coast and its overlooked wide range of tropical ecosystems such as estuaries, mangroves, tidal plains, coral reefs, and shallow calcareous algae banks. There is still great uncertainty as to what extent these environments can buffer increasing atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> levels and their role in the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> sink. Regional-scale studies in this part of the Atlantic are increasingly important to bridge the gaps and fine-tune large-scale modelling approaches, as well as improve our understanding of how the carbonate system and CO<sub>2</sub> flux are mediated by nutrient cycling and trophic regimes while also responding to anthropogenic activity and the associated impacts on the overall carbon budget.</p><p>This study is based on assessing the carbonate system and the associated nutrient biogeochemical processes in three distinct regions off northeastern Brazil. The overall goal was to test whether shelf regions off northeastern Brazil are distinct enough to not be treated homogeneously in studies looking at meso and large-scale anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> retention in the Tropical South Atlantic, due to their seasonal biogeochemical and trophic regimes. These contrasting areas were chosen to represent marine ecosystems that are found along the northeastern Brazilian coast and included: an urbanized estuarine metropolitan region (Recife-REC), a coastal island (Itamarac&#225;-ITA) and a pristine oceanic archipelago (Fernando de Noronha-FN). Focus is given to differences in terms of nutrient data, CO<sub>2</sub> buffering capacities, Ωar and estimates of CO<sub>2</sub> flux during the end of the rainy season in July of 2013.</p>Study Areas<p>Fernando de Noronha (FN) is an oceanic archipelago 550 Km off Recife, in the Equatorial Atlantic (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a) &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)). The area comprises a Marine Park around its main island and is delimited by the 50 m isobath. The archipelago belongs to one of the western branches of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (Gomes et al., 2000; Almeida, 2007) and is composed of 21 islands, covering an area of 113 km<sup>2</sup>. In FN, the population density is 170 inhabitants∙km<sup>−2</sup> (IBGE, 2015a) and occupation is restricted to 35% of the main island, where population and tourist numbers are controlled. The FN region is surrounded by coral reefs with relatively warmer water, where evaporation exceeds precipitation throughout the year. The ocean dynamics around FN is influenced by circulation patterns in the Equatorial Atlantic, mainly controlled by large-scale variability in trade winds and the migration of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) (Lumpkin &amp; Garzoli, 2005). The South Equatorial Current (SEC) flows westward and brings relatively high salinity and high temperature waters to FN at surface (S~36 and T~28˚C) while, underneath, between 150 - 350 m deep and flowing the opposite direction, the South Equatorial Undercurrent (SEUC) can be found between 3˚S - 5˚S, which is an eastward branch of the western boundary undercurrent known as North Brazil Undercurrent (NBUC) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)). The SEUC maximum geostrophic velocities have been estimated at 25˚W - 28˚W ranging from 20 - 40 cm∙s<sup>−1</sup> with its nucleus at about 150 m deep (Marin, 2009; Schott et al., 2002). Across the 35˚W meridian and closer to the location of FN, the SEUC flow was detected as deep as ~400 m with (Arhan et al., 1998; Schott et al., 2005). The Archipelago is an oasis to many migratory species, it is one of the main nesting grounds for marine birds in the entire Atlantic Ocean. The archipelago is partially protected as a no-take MPA and recognized by the UNESCO as a World Heritage Site. It also represents the only Brazilian oceanic island with a large permanent human population (3000 people), mass tourism (up to 90,000 people per year) and a permanent small-scale fishing community (Matheus et al., 2019).</p><p>Itamarac&#225; Island (ITA) is a coastal island located 56 km north of Recife (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(c)) with a population density of 370 inhabitants∙km<sup>−2</sup> (IBGE, 2015b). In front of the Island, the continental shelf is approximately 39 km wide with a maximum depth of 50 m (Ara&#250;jo et al., 2004). There are no significant riverine inputs and its coast is characterized by a shallow water column with seagrasses, Halodule wrightii, thriving closer to the shore and calcareous algae banks of Lithothamnium sp and Halimeda sp covering the sea bed from the 15 m isobath and deeper. In its shallow waters, the expected pattern is a higher productivity at higher irradiance levels, as demonstrated for another species of Lithothamnium, which had a 70% reduction in its productivity when submitted to a 30% reduction in incident light, about 30 &#181;mol photons∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙s<sup>−1</sup> (Riul et al., 2008). In fact, other calcareous algae that form rhodoliths or cover coastal reefs in shallow waters are more productive at higher irradiance levels, around 100 &#181;mol photons m<sup>2</sup>∙s<sup>−1</sup> (Villas-Boas et al., 2005). Rhodolith beds, like many other marine ecosystems, are affected by ongoing global change due to the increase in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (CO<sub>2</sub> in particular) and all its associated consequences, such as increases in seawater temperatures (1˚C - 4˚C by 2100), decreases in seawater pH (by ~0.3 - 0.5 units), shifts in carbon chemistry, sea level rise, and the increase in strength and frequency of extreme weather events (Gibbard et al., 2005; IPCC, 2014).</p><p>Recife (REC) is the main urban centre in northeastern Brazil. It is the 6th most populated metropolitan region, reaching a population density of 1400 inhabitants∙km<sup>−2</sup> (IBGE, 2015c) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(d)). The region lies partly on the mainland and partly on an island, thus being crossed by a series of waterways and connected by bridges. It is an area of great environmental and socio-economic importance in terms of shipping activity and fisheries. The water bodies flowing through REC, especially the Capibaribe and Beberibe rivers, are heavily polluted due to the dumping of domestic and industrial effluents and shipping traffic. According to the Pernambuco State Water Resources Agency, at the Capibaribe river mouth, eutrophic waters are found with DO values reaching 0 mL∙L<sup>−1</sup> and elevated values of ammonium, phosphate and thermo-tolerant coliforms (CPRH-PE, 2012). The continental shelf of REC is approximately 37 km wide, with a maximum depth of 65 m (Ara&#250;jo et al., 2004). Sandstone reefs are found along the coast, protecting the shoreline in the event of surges. However, these reefs have lost their size and biodiversity over time, due to eutrophication, increase in turbidity caused by the penetration of the river plume, ocean acidification and human activities (Flores Montes et al., 2011).</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sampling</title><p>Due to its tropical character, temperatures along the northeastern Brazilian coast do not vary significantly, with precipitation being the main factor responsible for determining the two main seasons: rainy and dry. Our study was carried out in the late rainy season, in July of 2013. In FN, one station was done off its south side (station 14) and two stations off its north side (stations 15 and 16), comprising an area of approximately 100 Km<sup>2</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)). At least five depths were sampled at each station. On the way to FN, an additional single oceanographic station was done in the open ocean (depth &gt; 4000 m) southeast off FN, nearly halfway from ITA, where the deepest sampling was done, with ten sampled depths, the deepest at 500 m (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). In ITA, seawater sampling was carried out along its shelf, one satiation down south (Station 10) and other two up north (stations 11 and 12), with at least three sampled depths at each one, comprising an area of approximately 36 Km<sup>2</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(c)). In REC there were nine oceanographic stations (stations 1 - 9), most of them with at least three sampled depths, comprising an area of approximately 28 Km<sup>2</sup> in front of the Port of Recife, which is also where the Capibaribe River meets the ocean (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(d)). See <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> for detailed information on all stations and sampled depths.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Seawater Chemical Analyses</title><p>Seawater was collected aboard R/V Alpha Delphini (Oceanographic Institute of the University of S&#227;o Paulo) during its inaugural oceanographic campaign using</p><p>a Seabird<sup>&#174;</sup> rosette with 12-bottles and a CTD module attached (model SBE 19 plus). Seawater temperature was retrieved from the CTD (&#177;0.001˚C). Salinity determination was conducted using a Beckman<sup>&#174;</sup> RS-10 salinometer (&#177;0.001) and the Dissolved Oxygen concentration (DO) was determined by potentiometric determination using al Titrando, Metrohm<sup>&#174;</sup>, with precisions of &#177;0.02 mL∙L<sup>−1</sup> for levels up to 2 mL∙L<sup>−1</sup> and &#177;0.04 mL∙L<sup>−1</sup> for higher levels, following the recommendations of Grasshoff et al. (1999). The pH was measured in the total scale using a portable combined glass electrode (model PHM 203) in a Thermo Orion pH meter model P-210A Radiometer<sup>&#174;</sup>, calibrated with standard buffers and stored in a KCl solution, following Aminot and Chaussepied (1983) and the recommendations of Dickson et al. (2007) with a precision of &#177;0.001.</p><p>Seawater for dissolved nutrients analysis was filtered through 0.45 μm GF/F</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Location and sampled depths of all oceanographic stations along the northeastern coast of Brazil. (Western Tropical South Atlantic, late rainy season, July 2013)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study Region</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Station</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lat. (˚)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Long. (˚)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sampled depths (m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  >REC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8.05952</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−34.85380</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8.04645</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−34.78270</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 10, 15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8.04645</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−34.82490</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8.04775</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−34.84000</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8.03692</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−34.84050</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8.03600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−34.79880</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0,5,10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8.02453</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−34.79230</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 10, 15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8.03558</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−34.82680</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8.04742</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−34.85370</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >ITA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.72890</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−34.77890</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.72980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−34.74800</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 10, 15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.80000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−34.77850</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OPEN OCEAN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.00410</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−33.15000</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 200, 300, 500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >FN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.89950</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−32.43340</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 10, 15, 25, 50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.80910</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−32.42750</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 10, 15, 25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.78750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−32.36330</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0, 5, 10, 15, 25, 40</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Whatman<sup>&#174;</sup> glass fiber membranes and kept frozen at −20˚C before chemical analyses. Dissolved silicate (Si-Si(OH)<sub>4</sub>) and dissolved phosphate ( P-PO 4 3 − ) were determined by the colorimetric method described by Grasshoff et al. (1999). The absorbance was measured using a Genesis II Bauch &amp; Lomb<sup>&#174;</sup> digital spectrophotometer and precisions were &#177;0.01 &#181;mol∙L<sup>−1</sup> and &#177; 0.02 &#181;mol∙L<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) was obtained from the sum of N-ammonium, N-nitrite and N-nitrate. N-ammonium was determined by the colorimetric method as described by Solorzano (1969) with the proposed adaptations by Tr&#233;guer and Le Corre (1975). The absorbance was read at 630 nm using a Genesis II Bauch &amp; Lomb<sup>&#210;</sup> digital spectrophotometer with a precision of &#177;0.05 μM. Dissolved nitrite and nitrate were determined as described by Tr&#233;guer and Le Corre (1975). The analysis was determined in a continuous flux system using a Bran-Luebbe<sup>&#174;</sup> AutoAnalyser II, following recommendations proposed by Grasshoff et al. (1999), Tr&#233;guer and Le Corre (1975) and Braga (1997a, 1997b) with precisions for nitrite and nitrate of &#177;0.01 μM and &#177;0.02 μM, respectively.</p><p>Total Alkalinity (TA) analysis was carried out by an open-cell potentiometric titration with a solution of 0.01 M HCl in NaCl media to account for seawater ionic strength and to ensure stable activity coefficients (Dickson et al., 2007). Titrations were performed using a Methrom<sup>&#174;</sup> Dosimat 700 doser, a Methrom<sup>&#174;</sup> 827 pH lab and a Methrom<sup>&#174;</sup> Unitrode glass electrode. The titrant solution was calibrated using an ultrapure TRIS primary standard solution following the recommendations of Grasshoff et al. (1999) and a SRM 423 reference. This method is cost-effective while also maintaining uncertainties at acceptable levels of 1.5% (Anes et al., 2018). Readings of pH, electric potential and temperature of seawater samples were obtained throughout the titration in a temperature-controlled dark chamber and then used to determine the equivalence volume (Veq) on a Gran plot based on inflexion points. The seawater density was calculated from T and S using the seawater state equation (UNESCO, 1981) and TA was calculated in gravimetric units of μmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>.</p><p>Seawater samples for Chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) determination were filtered in 0.45 μm GF/F Whatman<sup>&#174;</sup> glass fiber membranes. Chl-a was extracted from the filters using a 90% acetone solution and concentrations were determined by spectrophotometry as recommended by Strickland and Parsons (1972), using a Genesis II Bauch &amp; Lomb<sup>&#174;</sup> digital spectrophotometer, with a precision of &#177;0.01 mg∙m<sup>3</sup>. Seawater samples for dissolved Calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>) were also filtered using 0.45 μm GF/F Whatman<sup>&#174;</sup> glass fiber membranes and the Ca<sup>2+</sup> concentration was determined by chelatometric titration using EDTA following Grasshoff et al. (1999) with a precision of &#177;2 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Carbonate System and CO<sub>2</sub> Flux</title><p>The parameters of the carbonate system were estimated using CO<sub>2</sub> calc (Robbins et al., 2010), in which the inputs were pH and TA, along with pressure, salinity and dissolved nutrients. The set of equilibrium constants used was the one proposed by Millero (2010) for the CO<sub>2</sub> species, Dickson (1990) for the silicic acid and Lee et al. (2000) for total boron. Values of DIC, pCO<sub>2</sub>sw, R, Ω<sub>ar</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> flux were generated by the software. The atmospheric partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> was required (pCO<sub>2atm</sub>) as an input along with wind speed to obtain the air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux (CO<sub>2</sub> flux). The pCO<sub>2atm</sub> was estimated as follows:</p><p>p CO 2 atm = CO 2 mixingratio &#215; ( P a t m − P v a p o r ) (3)</p><p>where: the CO<sub>2</sub> <sub>mixing</sub><sup> </sup><sub>ratio</sub> is the relative concentration of CO<sub>2</sub> in the atmosphere, P<sub>atm</sub> is the atmospheric pressure at sea level and P<sub>vapor</sub> is the water vapor pressure.</p><p>The atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> mixing ratio (CO<sub>2mixing ratio</sub>) was set at 393 ppm, which represents the 20 m-high averaged atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration obtained from the time series record for the city of Natal, the closest to REC at the time of sampling, approximately 250 Km away (NOOA/ESRL in: Dlugokencky et al. (2015)) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Values of atmospheric pressure (P<sub>atm</sub>) and wind speed were obtained from the meteorological station of R/V Alpha Delphini. The negative contribution of water vapor pressure (P<sub>vapor</sub>) was calculated according to Weiss and Price (1980).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Analysis</title><p>The data were processed using the Grubb’s test (significance level α = 0.05) and</p><p>the outliers were removed. Statistical treatment was applied to the dataset by conducting a one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) to parameters that followed normal distribution, which was checked previously via Anderson-Darling probability plots (α = 0.05). If differences in the means were statistically significant, Tukey tests were applied to identify significant pair-wise differences. R version 3.5.3 was used to perform statistical analyses and to generate Box-Whisker plots.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Biogeochemistry and the Carbonate System</title><p>Recife (REC)—Coastal Waters</p><p>The largest range of T and S was found in REC (25.46˚C - 27.08˚C and 33.93˚C - 36.49˚C, respectively). REC was also the region where the lowest values of S were registered (&lt;35) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)). This is common in an environment where river inputs are constant, forming a salinity gradient of distribution. Santiago et al. (2010) detected values much lower in samples collected 4 km upstream the channel of the Recife port, where the riverine influence is even greater than in the river mouth (S maxima ~9.50). This riverine salinity clearly has an influence on the components of the carbonate system, however it is still unclear to which extent in REC when compared to S-driven fluctuations registered by studies on other impacted tropical estuaries, such as in the estuaries of the Yangtze by Zhai et al. (2007) and the Pearl River estuary, as showed by Guo et al. (2008).</p><p>In REC, pH variability was the highest (8.08 - 8.20) in relation to ITA and FN (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)), reef and open ocean areas respectively. The lowest limit highlights the interplay between the intrusion of seawater into the estuarine system and ebb flow carrying continental runoff. In addition to the riverine input in REC, the relatively low pH values might also result from ammonium-rich sewage discharge and excessive remineralization of organic matter from the metropolitan area (Braga et al., 2018a). N-ammonium comprised the major fraction</p><p>of the total DIN pool at the Capibaribe River mouth, where most of the stations registered values higher than 50%.</p><p>The intensified remineralization in REC was confirmed by the decreasing DO and Chl-a minima found at the bottom, close to the river mouth (3.87 mL∙L<sup>−1</sup> and 0.10 mg∙m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively). On the other hand, at the surface and subsurface levels, specially at station 2, values for DO and Chl-a maxima were respectively 5.38 mL∙L<sup>−1</sup> and 4.9 mg∙m<sup>−3</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(h)) showing the positive effect of the nutrient fertilization at the mentioned point, northward.</p><p>In terms of total dissolved nutrients, REC showed the highest values associated with the lowest salinities (DIN/ PO 4 3 − /Si(OH)<sub>4</sub>: maxima of 16.10/0.58/35.91 μmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>), which is expected from estuarine systems (Figures 3(e)-(g)). Santiago et al. (2010) reported even higher nutrient concentrations inside the mooring area of the port of REC DIN/ PO 4 3 − /Si(OH)<sub>4</sub>: 59.75/16.40/133.39 &#181;M, where riverine influence is pronounced with anthropogenic contribution. This indicates that nutrients are diluted by seawater and consumed on their way out of the port channel, possibly fuelling algal blooms.</p><p>In general, Chl-a values in REC were higher than in ITA and FN, with concentrations &gt; 2.00 mg∙m<sup>−3</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(h)) and increasing closer to the river mouth and towards the surface. Such vertical variability in terms Chl-a as well as DO content in REC can be explained by relatively high photosynthetic activity within the upper layer followed by contribution of pronounced remineralization rates at depth. REC also showed the largest range of pCO<sub>2</sub>sw (~200 μatm), with the highest mean (282 μatm) and a maximum of 340 μatm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)). Sutton et al. (2019)</p><p>reported a range from 60 to 337 matm in coastal areas measured in different mooring locations. The range of results in REC is influenced by freshwater input associated with tidal action on the seafloor associated with the intrusion of remineralized nutrients even under a strong salinity gradient, which contribute to the retention of newly introduced CO<sub>2(aq)</sub> into the water column and fuels new production locally. Similar correlations were also found by Guo et al. (2008) in the outer estuary of the Pearl River.</p><p>Additionally, a relatively high Revelle factor (R) in REC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)), suggests the water column in this region is less efficient in terms of buffering pCO<sub>2atm</sub> changes into seawater through an increase in DIC when compared to other two regions studied (ITA and FN). However, it is important to note that the waters studied in REC were twice as efficient when it comes to converting CO<sub>2</sub>atm into DIC in relation to other estuarine systems, especially those located in temperate regions, such as the Juan de Fuca Strait studied by Feely et al. (2010), where typically high R values reached around 15.6.</p><p>Itamarac&#225; Island (ITA)—Coastal waters</p><p>Seawater temperatures in ITA, the zone with calcareous benthic community, were the most homogenous, with values ranging from 26.45˚C - 26.68˚C, while salinity values varied from 35.4 - 36.3, comprising the highest values amongst the studied regions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)).</p><p>DO concentrations in ITA were similar to the values registered in REC and slightly lower when compared to open sea area (FN) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d)). Results for dissolved nutrients in ITA showed slightly lower mean values of DIN/ PO 4 3 − /Si(OH)<sub>4</sub>: 0.72/0.08/3.81 μmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, when compared to the values registered in REC (Figures 3(e)-(g)). Relatively low values of Chl-a (range 0.64 - 1.90 mg∙m<sup>−3</sup>) found in ITA indicate productivity partially based on regenerated processes limited by inorganic N availability.</p><p>ITA waters were the most alkaline of the three studied regions, with a TA maximum of 2470 μmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)). The relatively high values in ITA can be explained by the higher contribution of dissolved carbonate ( CO 3 2 − ) as a member of carbonate system. This is supported by the relatively high values of pH as well as by Ω<sub>ar</sub>, with slightly higher Ω<sub>a</sub> registered in ITA especially closer to the bottom (~4.8) followed by FN (4.6, see the next section) and REC (4.0) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(e)).</p><p>The 15% higher TA in ITA is likely to be a result of a series of synergic factors, all of which result in an increase of Ω<sub>ar</sub>. An insignificant freshwater input combined with a shallow and well-ventilated water column, as well as slightly higher T and S contributed to the reduction of Kspar, while the constant supply of CO<sub>2(aq)</sub> from the atmosphere is coupled to an efficient biogenic precipitation, leading to the excess of Ca ligands (i.e. carbonate ions) with respect to dissolved ionic Ca<sup>2+</sup> that is removed from the water column due to the local calcareous algae banks. This is reflected in the mean ratio of dissolved CO 3 2 − /Ca<sup>2+</sup>, which was relatively higher in ITA (2.35 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup>), in relation to 2.06 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup> and 2.27 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup> in REC and FN respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Concentrations of dissolved calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>) and carbonate ions ( CO 3 2 − ) and the CO 3 2 − /Ca<sup>2+</sup> ratio at Recife-REC, Itamarac&#225; Island-ITA and Fernando de Noronha-FN. The precision for Ca<sup>2+</sup> is &#177;2 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup> and for CO 3 2 − is &#177;1% (Grasshoff et al., 1999)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study region</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Station</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Depth (m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+ </sup> (mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Density (kg∙m<sup>−3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+ </sup> (&#181;mol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CO 3 2 − <sup> </sup> (&#181;mol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CO 3 2 − /Ca<sup>2+</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="13"  >REC</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1022.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9971.880</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >199.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0200</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >411.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1023.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,047.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0226</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >435.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1023.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,621.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0178</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >419.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1022.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,235.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >167.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0164</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >425.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1023.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,363.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >188.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0181</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >424.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1023.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,348.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >194.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0188</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >420.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1023.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,249.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0203</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >426.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1023.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,386.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >206.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0198</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1022.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9976.110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0180</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >417.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1022.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,183.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >222.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0219</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >432.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1023.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,533.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >192.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0183</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >430.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1024.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,482.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >205.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0196</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >431.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1024.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,518.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >229.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0218</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >430.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1024.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,492.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0240</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1024.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,463.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0225</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >434.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1024.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,595.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >222.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0210</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >437.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1024.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,641.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >239.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0225</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >437.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1024.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,648.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >222.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0209</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >420.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1024.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,253.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0214</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >419.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1024.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,219.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >236.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0231</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >407.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1023.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9938.860</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >225.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0227</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >424.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1024.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,334.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0212</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="10"  >ITA</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >430.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1024.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,496.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0191</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >425.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1024.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,366.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >181.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0175</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >426.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1024.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,389.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >232.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0224</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >435.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,594.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >249.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0235</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >440.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,723.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >269.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0251</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >431.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,506.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0258</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >436.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,630.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0236</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >434.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,581.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >278.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0264</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >438.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,671.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >254.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0239</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >433.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,556.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0274</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >FN</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >438.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,678.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >273.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0256</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >441.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,732.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >260.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0243</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >438.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,672.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0226</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >440.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,717.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >237.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0221</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >438.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,663.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0214</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >439.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,683.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >249.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0234</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >428.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,416.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0206</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >431.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1025.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,502.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0219</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Results for pCO<sub>2</sub>sw in ITA showed a narrower range when compared to REC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)), which reflects its oceanic and more oligotrophic conditions supported by little remineralization of organic matter inducing a new injection CO2aq. Furthermore, the relatively high TA and DIC signals in ITA indicate a water column prone to CO<sub>2(aq)</sub> saturation, leading to shifts in the carbonate system towards the formation of HCO 3 – and CO 3 2 − .</p><p>Overall, these results suggest that ITA is the system that sits at the optimal part of the spectrum for CO<sub>2</sub> take-up when compared to the other regions investigated. This is mainly attributed to new production and fixation of C by calcareous algae closely coupled with wind-driven and turbulent mixing in a shallow water column, which seem to be the main processes influencing the cascading of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> (see wind speed record in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(c)).</p><p>Fernando de Noronha (FN)—Oceanic Waters Around the Archipelago</p><p>Seawater temperatures were significantly higher in FN than in ITA and REC (one-way ANOVA, F(2.52) = 143.13, P ≤ 0.01; post-hoc Tukey: P<sub>FN-ITA</sub> ≤ 0.01 and P<sub>FN-REC</sub> ≤ 0.01), where the warmest waters were found (FN mean temperature of 27.60˚C) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a)). This is a result of its equatorial oceanic location, where solar radiation is constant throughout the year. Salinity values in FN were the most homogeneous, with little variation detected across depths and stations (35.90 - 36.15) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)).</p><p>Chl-a concentrations were the most homogenous, with values ranging from 0.15 - 0.50 mg∙m<sup>−3</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(h)), the lowest between the three studied regions. A study at the Rocas Atoll, located 145 km east of FN showed a similar range in terms of Chl-a (0.30 - 1.07 mg∙m<sup>−3</sup>) (Jales et al., 2015). However, de Souza et al. (2013) reported patches of high Chl-a (&gt;0.70 mg∙m<sup>−3</sup>) nearby the archipelago of FN, which might indicate some occasional nuclei of more evident production. In general, the lowest values of dissolved nutrients were found in FN (DIN/ PO 4 3 − / Si ( OH ) 4 : maxima of 0.28/0.08/4.99 μmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>) (Figures 3(e)-(g)). The low Chl-a results combined with low dissolved nutrients suggest that primary production is maintained by regenerative processes (i.e., regenerated primary production) and likely supported by nitrogen fixers. A study by Queiroz et al. (2015)on the composition of phytoplankton in the Equatorial Atlantic around the archipelago of Saint Peter and Saint Paul, located 600 km NE of FN (0˚55'10&quot;N 29˚20'33&quot;W—<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)) showed that nitrogen fixers (Trichodesmium thiebautii) comprised an important fraction of the phytoplankton biomass in the Equatorial Atlantic.</p><p>Studies on the so-called “island mass effect” (IME) have highlighted its role in driving the spatial distribution of Chl-a and nutrients at some parts of the Fernando de Noronha Ridge (FNR) in the Tropical Western Atlantic, such as Jales et al. (2015) and Cordeiro et al. (2013), both studies carried out at the Rocas Atoll, located 145 km east off FN (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). Regarding the presence of this effect in FN, de Souza et al. (2013) reported there was evidence of upwelling occurring at seamounts with summits located below the thermocline close to FN. This suggests a topography-flow interaction can occur and disrupt thermohaline structures, consequently causing upward entrainment of deep nutrient-rich water to the top of the thermocline. Even though the intrusion of nutrient-rich water around FN leading to enhanced nutrient assimilation was not investigated in this study. Silva et al. (2019) showed evidence for an uplift of the thermohaline structure during the late rainy season of July 2010, which was associated with an increase of Chl-a concentrations of up to 1 mg∙m<sup>−3</sup> downstream the Archipelago. However, the same authors highlighted that the observed IME was not strong enough to significantly change the carbonate system to further induce biological carbon uptake or cause a supply of CO<sub>2</sub>-rich deep waters.</p><p>The obtained results for TA show similar means between FN and ITA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a); one-way ANOVA, F(2,52) = 4.44, post-hoc Tukey: P<sub>FN-REC</sub> = 0.11). However, a larger spread was detected in FN with water tending to be less alkaline (mean TA 2294 μmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)) despite the oceanic character of FN and the lowest variability both in terms of S and pH (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b) &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c)). The lower end values of the TA range (~2150 μmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>) in FN indicate that the carbonate system is partially influenced by other processes associated with the release of hydrogen protons (H<sup>+</sup>) within the subsurface layer and the top of the thermocline in FN, consequently reacting with proton acceptors such as CO 3 2 − and decreasing overall TA values.</p><p>Three main processes involving nitrogen fixation at surface levels and a rapid assimilation of nutrients at subsurface levels could help explain the observed mean difference in TA observed between ITA and FN (ΔTA of ~70 μmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>). The nitrification of recycled nitrogen from NH 4 + to NO 3 − followed by rapid NO 3 − assimilation is responsible for a decrease in TA of 2 moles per mole of NO 3 − formed. Secondly, the remineralization of newly formed NH 4 + produced via N fixation followed by nitrification is responsible for a further decrease in TA of 1 mole per mole of N fixed. Another process that also reduces TA is the assimilation of NH 4 + itself, which results in a decrease in TA of 1 mole per mole of NH 4 + used, following the so-called nutrient-H<sup>+</sup>-compensation principle (Wolf-Gladrow et al., 2007).</p><p>Results for the DIN pool composition in FN show relatively high fractional values of N-ammonium particularly at shallower depths. NH 4 + comprised more than 60% of the DIN pool at Station 14 and more than 40% at Stations 15 and 16 for surface and subsurface depths. Recent studies also show there is enhanced recycling of NH 4 + associated with productive regimes and a TA drawdown around the main island in FN and close to the shore (Braga et al., 2018a; Braga et al., 2018b).</p><p>Furthermore, a quantitative assessment as to whether these nutrient-assimilation mechanisms could have caused such a drawdown is presented based on results shown here and values found in the literature.</p><p>Considering nitrification of upwelled NH 4 + at station 13 and given that the observed mean concentration of NO 3 − below the thermocline was ~20 μmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, it is hypothesized that at least 20 μmol of recycled NH 4 + would have been nitrified to NO 3 − in the upper thermocline and readily assimilated in the oligotrophic water column of FN, producing a ΔAT of ~40 μmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>. N fixation estimates in the equatorial South Atlantic are very scarce. However, considering that most studies in the equatorial North Atlantic have estimated the integrated N fixation at approximately ~200 μmol N∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙d<sup>−1</sup> (Gruber &amp; Sarmiento, 1997; Capone et al., 2005; Moore et al., 2009), values for the upper thermocline in the southern portion of the equatorial Atlantic would likely agree. Therefore, as a first approximation, a 100 m homogenous upper thermocline in the equatorial South Atlantic would represent a ΔAT of 2 μmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup> due to remineralization of fixed N into NH 4 + followed by nitrification. Lastly, to account for the total ΔAT of ~70 μmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, the direct assimilation of a further 28 μmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup> of remineralised nitrogen in the form of NH 4 + would have to have occurred. This is plausible given that NH 4 + constituted a significant part of the DIN pool, which reflects that productivity in FN could also rely on ammonium-based carbon fixation. However, there might be additional contributions driving the observed decrease in TA, which can be, for example, via the release of sulphates during remineralization (Wolf-Gladrow et al., 2007), nevertheless this needs further investigation as the local processes driving the sulphur as well as the nitrogen and carbon cycles in this part of the Atlantic are still poorly understood.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. ∆pCO<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> Flux</title><p>Surface and subsurface pCO<sub>2</sub>sw data from REC showed relatively high values (&gt;280 μatm) in front of the Capibaribe river mouth (stations 1 and 2), causing the lower differences between estimated pCO<sub>2atm</sub> and pCO<sub>2sw</sub> (~100 μatm). These high pCO<sub>2</sub>sw values reflect the role of the river plume in injecting DIC-rich water into the system. Additionally, this coincides with the observed Chl-a maxima at surface levels, showing that this region favours patches of high productivity to develop. In contrast, at stations more offshore (6, 7 and 8) the lowest pCO<sub>2</sub>sw values and the highest differences between estimated pCO<sub>2atm</sub> and pCO<sub>2sw</sub> were registered (~180 μatm). This region of the estuarine system is relatively less dynamic in terms of water movement, which allows for the settlement of organic matter that had been produced at the river mouth. This means that, even with moderate to low primary production levels happening at the surface layers, there is significant remineralization in this portion of the system close to the bottom that drives the observed increase in pCO<sub>2</sub>sw. In ITA, pCO<sub>2</sub>sw values ranged from 250 - 300 μatm. Station 10 showed the maximum value at the surface, followed by station 12 (300 μatm and 280 μatm, respectively). These points differed from the estimated pCO<sub>2atm</sub> by approximately 80 and 100 μatm, respectively. Even though, the range of pCO<sub>2</sub>sw observed in REC was larger than that of ITA, no significant difference in mean pCO<sub>2</sub>sw between REC and ITA was found. On the other hand, pCO<sub>2</sub>sw values differed significantly between REC and FN, this is mainly due to surface values in FN being significantly lower, highlighting the relatively less saturated and oligotrophic water column of FN (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a)).</p><p>Overall, CO<sub>2</sub>flux estimates suggest that the three regions acted as sinks (negative fluxes) during the sampling campaign in the late rainy season of July 2013 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b)). However, values of CO<sub>2</sub>flux from REC were significantly lower than in ITA and FN, with data from stations 1,5, 8 and 9 indicating practically atmospheric equilibrium (fluxes &gt; −2 mmol C∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙d<sup>−1</sup>). This suggests that the CO<sub>2</sub>flux into the ocean in REC coastal waters is attenuated by high pCO<sub>2</sub>sw, which might be a result of the combined effects of eutrophication, remineralization, low pH and high freshwater and DIC inputs, all of which counteract a further dissolution of CO<sub>2atm</sub>, shifting the carbonate system towards CO<sub>2(aq)</sub> formation and outgassing. Most studies concerning CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes in estuarine systems along the Brazilian northeastern coast show that these systems typically act sources of CO<sub>2</sub></p><p>when their entire catchment area is considered (Araujo et al., 2013; Noriega &amp; Araujo, 2014; Noriega et al., 2015). Nonetheless, local studies investigating the interface between estuary and shelf waters are scarce and the complexity of biological processes taking place in these areas makes the carbonate system variability in the downstream portion of estuarine environments poorly understood. There is also seasonality, which can be an important agent contributing to the variability in the carbonate system (Sutton et al., 2019), adding to the complexity of this area.</p><p>Additional uncertainty occurs when pCO<sub>2</sub> estimates and other parameters of the carbonate system are derived from linear relationships with, for example, sea surface salinity (SSS). Bonou et al. (2016) emphasized that this is particularly the case when SSS-based pCO<sub>2</sub> values are lower than 250 &#181;atm in regions off the northeastern coast of Brazil as SSS expressions fail to consider the high biological activity observed along the shelf. These deviations might be understood as noise when first analysed altogether in the context of the linear relationships based on large collated datasets. However, by looking closely at the processes that might be driving these deviations, the role of high biological activity becomes evident in differentiating each of these coastal systems, ultimately setting them aside from the general trends. The results presented here suggest that both ITA and FN are systems where biological processes underpinning the carbonate biogeochemistry are very distinct from other areas along the shelf and more offshore. This means that studies involving estimates for the carbonate system parameters relying on SSS in these locations should be considered with caution and factor in biogeochemical processes and seasonal conditions.</p><p>The present values for CO<sub>2</sub>flux were generally lower than −12 mmol C∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙day<sup>−1</sup> in ITA and FN. Stations 14 in FN and 10 in ITA, showed the highest influxes (~−20 mmol C∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙day<sup>−1</sup>). Rain, wind speed and sea roughness are thought to be the main factors responsible for the injection of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> at these stations, as these contribute to the dissolution of CO<sub>2</sub> into seawater by lowering the salinity of the air-sea layer and forming undulations and turbulence. In fact, at the time waters of ITA and FN were sampled at stations 10 and 14, wind speed and sea roughness were the highest registered (wind speeds &gt; 10 m∙s<sup>−1</sup>). Relatively high wind gusts were also observed at stations 15, 12 and 11 (&gt;8 m∙s<sup>−1</sup>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(c)). The observed fluxes result from a water column saturated with atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> being efficiently coupled with biological processes that remove DIN species. Particularly, results suggest that ITA is marked by efficient biological precipitation of calcium carbonate by the calcareous algae matts while the uptake in FN is mainly characterized by ammonium-based productivity and intermittent bursts of moderate production following the entrainment of nutrient-rich water within the thermocline.</p><p>An estimated uptake of approximately 9.46 Gt C∙yr<sup>−1</sup> was found when all surface in situ values of CO<sub>2</sub>flux were averaged within each region and then integrated in space (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). This estimate would represent only a 1.7% offset on the so-called Brazilian Current marginal catchment area outgassing (+0.567</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Spatially-averaged fluxes ( CO 2 flux &#175; ) within each region and the estimated annual uptake (CO<sub>2</sub> uptake) based on their surface area. Pernambuco, Brazil. (Western Tropical South Atlantic, late rainy season, July 2013)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Site</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C O 2 f l u x &#175; (mmol C∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙day<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Surface area (m<sup>2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C O 2 f l u x &#175; (gC∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙yr<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CO<sub>2</sub> uptake (gC∙yr<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >REC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8 &#215; 10<sup>7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.45 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ITA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−14.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6 &#215; 10<sup>7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−65.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.34 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ST13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−11.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6 &#215; 10<sup>−2 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−48.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.85 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−66.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.68 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−44.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.64 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−196.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−9.46 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>TgC∙yr<sup>−1</sup>) reported by Laruelle et al. (2014). However minimal this offset might represent when compared to the overall outgassing estimation, it is important to note that this study covered an area over 3000 times smaller than that considered by the referred authors. This highlights how important regional-scale observations are to improving our understanding of the biogeochemical processes which alter the carbonate system. They also contribute to fine tuning large-scale approaches in tropical shelf seas.</p><p>It is important to highlight that measurements were based on single observations during the late rainy season, thus they do not represent net fluxes over seasonal cycles and that results were compared to studies based on monthly or seasonally-averaged measurements. This also reinforces the need of further in situ seasonal research to be conducted in the tropical part of the Western South Atlantic to assess whether the patterns observed remain year-round. The need for monitoring efforts addressing the state of Brazilian waters in face of increasing atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and ocean acidification has been recognized and initiatives are being implemented towards the establishment of a more cohesive and integrative network, able to share information at regional, national, and international stages (Kerr et al., 2016). This study further emphasizes the role of regional-scale studies in the identification of important sites to gain a better understanding of the carbon cycle in shelf seas and long-term shifts in the carbonate system in the equatorial Atlantic off northeastern Brazil.</p><p>In FN, even though low Chl-a and DO values indicated the occurrence of remineralization associated with high temperatures, which are factors that induce CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing, relatively high CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes into the ocean were also detected where typically high seawater temperatures occur throughout the year. de Souza et al. (2013) suggested that, as greater evaporation takes place in FN, surface water salinity tends to increase thus becoming denser. As a result, surface water parcels tend to sink to the base of the thermocline, where they meet lower temperatures and become even denser. This might indicate there are other factors participating in the CO<sub>2</sub> sink in the waters surrounding FN and further investigations as to how this sink is driven must be carried out. Additionally, while this study highlights possible effects caused by the North Brazil Undercurrent bifurcation along and off the shelf up to FN’s location, observations from Olivier et al. (2021) also highlight the importance of biogeochemistry, biological activity, low-salinity plumes and the role of the North Brazil Current rings in driving variability in productivity, affecting the carbonate system and modulating CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes in this portion of the Atlantic.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Despite being considered homogenous in terms of CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes by meso and large-scale modelling studies, this study demonstrates that three Brazilian tropical regions showed specificities in physical and biogeochemical processes as well as trophic conditions that can induce variability in the carbonate system and change CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes locally. This shows that parts of the tropical Atlantic can act as CO<sub>2</sub> sinks at seasonal scales (in this case considering observations in late rainy season). More studies are needed to determine whether this drawdown is an intermittent pattern or remains year-round. This study also highlights the importance of biological processes in controlling TA and DIC levels in regions of high salinity and low pCO<sub>2sw</sub>, besides the influence of freshwater input and SSS in the domain of the South Equatorial Current.</p><p>The urbanized estuarine area (REC) is prone to sewage runoffs, eutrophication and intense organic matter decomposition associated with river inputs reaching adjacent areas. REC showed CO<sub>2</sub> emission/sequestration tendencies close to atmospheric equilibrium. However, the proximity to the Capibaribe river mouth, an area of low DO values, high freshwater and DIC inputs and elevated remineralization rates, indicate that the carbonate system is prone to shift towards CO<sub>2(aq)</sub> formation and outgassing. In contrast, different scenarios were observed in ITA and FN. ITA showed the highest CO<sub>2</sub> drawdown flux, which was mediated by shallow, turbulent mixed waters and biogeochemical processes linked to efficient calcification (high Ω<sub>ar</sub>). The carbonate system in FN was mainly driven by a water column biogeochemically based on oligotrophic characteristics, associated with high T and S at the surface and primary production predominantly based on recycled inorganic nitrogen coupled with both enhanced N fixation and NH 4 + assimilation. The region is further influenced by Equatorial Atlantic underwater circulation at deeper layers above the thermocline, where nutrient-rich water is brought up and allows for some localized production. However, it is still unclear to what extent these processes can alter seawater biogeochemistry over seasonal timescales, highlighting the need for further studies.</p><p>More observations are needed to better understand how these systems can respond to and cope with anthropogenic pressures. ITA has the potential to be an ideal site for the study of carbonate system long-term variability and ocean acidification in the continental shelf of this part of the Equatorial Atlantic, given that 1) calcareous algae banks act as sessile bio-indicators and respond to ocean acidification via changes in their calcification rates, 2) ITA is characterized by a relatively shallow, turbulent and well-mixed water column with low variability in pH, S and T with respect to values found offshore, all of which reflect the rapid cascading with respect to changes in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and ultimately due to 3) its convenient location with easy access to laboratory facilities. Finally, more regional studies are also needed to promote long-term monitoring efforts and better understand the role of the shelf seas and coastal marine systems in the cycling and sinking of anthropogenic carbon at key regions in the tropical Atlantic.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank FAPESP for the financial support provided as part of the Scientific Initiation internship (grant ref. no. 2012/17656-3) and Project CaReCos (grant ref. no. 2011/5058-2). We would like to thank the IOUSP R/V Alpha Delphini crew, who assisted with logistic support and onboard safety, the IOUSP technician Mr Wilson Natal, who provided the meteorological data, all the collaborators from LABNUT-IOUSP who carried out all the laboratory analyses and organized datasets for T, S, pH, DO and nutrients. We thank our colleagues from the Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE) for enabling chlorophyll readings. We also thank the anonymous reviewers, who also added positive contributions to the accomplishment of this work.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Bertini, L., &amp; Braga, E. S. (2022). The Contribution of Nutrients and Water Properties to the Carbonate System in Three Particular Areas of the Tropical Atlantic (NE-BRAZIL). Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 10, 135-161. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2022.102009</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.115557-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Almeida, F. F. M. (2007). Ilhas oceanicas brasileiras e suas rela&amp;#231;&amp;#245;es com a tect&amp;#244;nica atlantica. Terrae Didatica, 2, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.20396/td.v2i1.8637462</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aminot, A., &amp; Chaussepied, M. (1983). Manuel des Analyses Chimiques en Milieu Merin (395 p). Centre National Pour L’Explotation des Océans (CNEXO).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anes, B., Silva, R. J. B., Oliveira, C., &amp; Cam&amp;#245;es, M. F. (2018). Uncertainty Evaluation of Alkalinity Measurements on Seawater Samples. Measurement, 129, 395-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.07.042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Araujo, M., Noriega, C., Medeiros, C., Lefèvre, N., Ibanhez, J. S. P., Flores Montes, M. et al. (2019). On the Variability in the CO2 System and Water Productivity in the Western Tropical Atlantic off North and Northeast Brazil. Journal of Marine Systems, 189, 62-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2018.09.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Araujo, M., Noriega, C., Veleda, D., &amp; Lefèvre, N. (2013). Nutrient Input and CO2 Flux of a Tropical Coastal Fluvial System with High Population Density in the Northeast Region of Brazil. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 5, 362-375. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2013.53A037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Araújo, T. C. M., Seoane, J. C. S., &amp; Coutinho, P. N. (2004). Geomorfologia da plataforma continental de Pernambuco. In E. Eskinazi-Le&amp;#231;a, S. Neumann-Leit&amp;#227;o, &amp; M. F. Costa (Eds.), Oceanografia: um cenário tropical. (pp. 39-58). Baga&amp;#231;o.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arhan, M., Mercier, H., Bourlès, B., &amp; Gouriou, Y. (1998). Hydrographic Sections across the Atlantic at 7&amp;#176;30N and 4&amp;#176;30S. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 45, 829-872. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(98)00001-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bates, N. R. (2007). Interannual Variability of the Oceanic CO2 Sink in the Subtropical Gyre of the North Atlantic Ocean over the Last 2 Decades. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 112, C09013. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003759</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bates, N. R., Astor, Y. M., Church, M. J., Currie, K., Dore, J. E., González-Dávila, M. et al. (2014). A Time-Series View of Changing Surface Ocean Chemistry Due to Ocean Uptake of Anthropogenic CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and Ocean Acidification. Oceanography, 27, 126-141. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonou, F. K., Noriega, C., Lefèvre, N., &amp; Araujo, M. (2016). Distribution of CO2 Parameters in the Western Tropical Atlantic Ocean. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 73, 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2015.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Braga, E. S. (1997a). Determina&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o automática de nitrato. In: A. R. Wagener, &amp; R. Carreira (Org.). Métodos analíticos de referência em Oceanografia Química (Vol. 1, pp. 31-35). REVIZEE, MMA, SMA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Braga, E. S. (1997b). Determina&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o automática de nitrato. In: A. R. Wagener, &amp; R. Carreira (Org.). Métodos analíticos de referência em Oceanografia Química (Vol. 1, pp. 27-29). REVIZEE, MMA, SMA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Braga, E. S., Berbel, G. B. B., &amp; Chiozzini, V. G. (2018a). Dissolved Organic Matter (C, N, P) on the Pernambuco Coast and Fernando de Noronha archipelago (Tropical Zone of Western South Atlantic, Brazil)—A Contribution to the Evaluation of Environmental Impact. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, 66, 30-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-87592018147906601</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Braga, E. S., Chiozzini, V. G., &amp; Berbel, G. B. B. (2018b). Oligotrophic Water Conditions Associated with Organic Matter Regeneration Support Life and Indicate Pollution on the Western Side of Fernando de Noronha Island-NE, Brazil (3&amp;#176;S). Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, 66, 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-87592018148306601</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Broecker, W. S., Takahashi, T., Simpson, H., &amp; Peng, T.-H. (1979). Fate of Fossil Fuel Carbon Dioxide and the Global Carbon Budget. Science, 206, 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.206.4417.409</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Capone, D. G., Burns, J. A., Montoya, J. P., Subramaniam, A., Mahaffey, C., Gunderson, T. et al. (2005). Nitrogen Fixation by Trichodesmium spp.: An Important Source of New Nitrogen to the Tropical and Subtropical North Atlantic Ocean. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19, GB2024. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002331</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cooley, S. R., &amp; Yager, P. L. (2006). Physical and Biological Contributions to the Western Tropical North Atlantic Ocean Carbon Sink Formed by the Amazon River Plume. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 111, C08018. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC002954</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cooley, S., Coles, V., Subramaniam, A., &amp; Yager, P. (2007). Seasonal Variations in the Amazon Plume-Related Atmospheric Carbon Sink. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 21, GB3014. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002831</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cordeiro, T. A., Brandini, F. P., Rosa, R. S., &amp; Sassi, R. (2013). Deep Chlorophyll Maximum in Western Equatorial Atlantic—How Does It Interact with Islands Slopes and Seamounts. Marine Science, 3, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ms.20130301.03</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CPRH-PE (2012). Relatório de Bacias Hidrográficas.http://www.cprh.pe.gov.br/ARQUIVOS_ANEXO/K_Relat12-CB.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">de Souza, C. S., da Luz, J. A. G., Macedo, S., Flores Montes, M. J., &amp; Mafalda, P. (2013). Chlorophyll a and Nutrient Distribution around Seamounts and Islands of the Tropical South-Western Atlantic. Marine and Freshwater Research, 64, 168-184. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF12075</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dickson, A. G. (1990). Thermodynamics of the Dissociation of Boric Acid in Synthetic Seawater from 273.15 to 318.15 K. Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers, 37, 755-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(90)90004-F</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dickson, A. G., Sabine, C. L., &amp; Christian, J. R. (2007). Guide to Best Practices for Ocean CO2 Measurements. North Pacific Marine Science Organization.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dlugokencky, E., Lang, P., Masarie, K., Crotwell, A., &amp; Crotwell, M. (2015). Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Dry Air Mole Fractions from the NOAA ESRL Carbon Cycle Cooperative Global Air Sampling Network, 1968-2014. NOAA ESRL Global Monitoring Division.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doney, S. C., Balch, W. M., Fabry, V. J., &amp; Feely, R. A. (2009). Ocean Acidification: A Critical Emerging Problem for the Ocean Sciences. Oceanography, 22, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2009.93</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Egleston, E. S., Sabine, C. L., &amp; Morel, F. M. M. (2010). Revelle Revisited: Buffer Factors that Quantify the Response of Ocean Chemistry to Changes in DIC and Alkalinity. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 24, GB1002. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003407</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Flores Montes</surname><given-names> M. J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Paulo</surname><given-names> J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Nascimento Filho</surname><given-names> G.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Gaspar</surname><given-names> F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Feitosa</surname><given-names> F. A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Santos</surname><given-names> A. et al. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>. The Trophic Status of an Urban Estuarine Complex in Northeast Brazil</article-title><source> Journal of Coastal Research</source><volume> 64</volume>,<fpage> 408</fpage>-<lpage>411</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Friedlingstein, P., Jones, M., O’sullivan, M., Andrew, R., Hauck, J., Peters, G. et al. (2019). Global Carbon Budget 2019. Earth System Science Data, 11, 1783-1838. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gibbard, S., Caldeira, K., Bala, G., Phillips, T. J., &amp; Wickett, M. (2005). Climate Effects of Global Land Cover Change. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L23705. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024550</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gomes, P. O., Gomes, B. S., Palma, J., Jinno, K., &amp; De Souza, J. M. (2000). Ocean-Continent Transition and Tectonic Framework of the Oceanic Crust at the Continental Margin off NE Brazil: Results of LEPLAC Project. Geophysical Monograph-American Geophysical Union, 115, 261-292. https://doi.org/10.1029/GM115p0261</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goyet, C., Adams, R., &amp; Eischeid, G. (1998). Observations of the CO2 System Properties in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean. Marine Chemistry, 60, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(97)00081-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grasshoff, K., Kremling, K., &amp; Erhardt, M. (1999). Methods of Seawater Analysis (3rd ed., 600 p). Wiley-VCH Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527613984</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gruber, N., &amp; Sarmiento, J. L. (1997). Global Patterns of Marine Nitrogen Fixation and Denitrification. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 11, 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB00077</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gruber, N., Gloor, M., Mikaloff Fletcher, S. E., Doney, S. C., Dutkiewicz, S., Follows, M. J. et al. (2009). Oceanic Sources, Sinks, and Transport of Atmospheric CO2. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 23, GB1005. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003349</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, X., Cai, W.-J., Zhai, W., Dai, M., Wang, Y., &amp; Chen, B. (2008). Seasonal Variations in the Inorganic Carbon System in the Pearl River (Zhujiang) Estuary. Continental Shelf Research, 28, 1424-1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2007.07.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hutchins, D., Fu, F.-X., Zhang, Y., Warner, M., Feng, Y., Portune, K. et al. (2007). CO2 control of Trichodesmium N2 Fixation, Photosynthesis, Growth Rates, and Elemental Ratios: Implications for Past, Present, and Future Ocean Biogeochemistry. Limnology and Oceanography, 52, 1293-1304. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.4.1293</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IBGE (2015a). Fernando de Noronha/Pernambuco. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. http://cod.ibge.gov.br/FTA</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IBGE (2015b). Ilha de Itamaracá/ Pernambuco. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. http://cod.ibge.gov.br/CWJ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IBGE (2015c). Recife/Pernambuco. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.http://cod.ibge.gov.br/BDM</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">IPCC (2014). Summary for Policymakers. In C. B. Field et al. (Ed.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1-32).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jales, M. C., Feitosa, F. A. N., Koening, M. L., Montes, M. J. F., Araújo Filho, M. C., &amp; Silva, R. A. (2015). Phytoplankton Biomass Dynamics and Environmental Variables around the Rocas Atoll Biological Reserve, South Atlantic. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, 63, 443-454. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-87592015093906304</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kerr, R., da Cunha, L. C., Kikuchi, R. K. P., Horta, P. A., Ito, R. G., Müller, M. N. et al. (2016). The Western South Atlantic Ocean in a High-CO2 World: Current Measurement Capabilities and Perspectives. Environmental Management, 57, 740-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0630-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K&amp;#246;rtzinger, A. (2003). A Significant CO2 Sink in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean Associated with the Amazon River Plume. Geophysical Research Letters, 30, 2287. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018841</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., Bakker, D. C., &amp; Schuster, U. (2014). Recent Variability of the Global Ocean Carbon Sink. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 28, 927-949. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004853</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laruelle, G. G., Lauerwald, R., Pfeil, B., &amp; Regnier, P. (2014). Regionalized Global Budget of the CO2 Exchange at the Air-Water Interface in Continental Shelf Seas. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 28, 1199-1214. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004832</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le Quéré, C., Moriarty, R., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Sitch, S., Korsbakken, J. I. et al. (2015). Global Carbon Budget 2015. Earth System Science Data, 7, 349-396. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-349-2015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, K., Millero, F. J., Byrne, R. H., Feely, R. A., &amp; Wanninkhof, R. (2000). The Recommended Dissociation Constants for Carbonic Acid in Seawater. Geophysical Research Letters, 27, 229-232. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL002345</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lefévre, N., Diverrés, D., &amp; Gallois, F. (2017). Origin of CO2 Undersaturation in the Western Tropical Atlantic. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 62, 595-607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2010.00475.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lumpkin, R., &amp; Garzoli, S. L. (2005). Near-Surface Circulation in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 52, 495-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2004.09.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marin, F. de O. (2009). A Subcorrente Norte do Brasil ao largo da Costa do Nordeste. Universidade de S&amp;#227;o Paulo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matheus, Z., Francini-Filho, R. B., Pereira-Filho, G. H., Moraes, F. C., Moura, R. L., et al. (2019). Benthic Reef Assemblages of the Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, Tropical South-West Atlantic: Effects of Depth, Wave Exposure and Cross-Shelf Positioning. PLoS ONE, 14, e0210664. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210664</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Millero, F. J. (2010). Carbonate Constants for Estuarine Waters. Marine and Freshwater Research, 61, 139-142. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF09254</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moore, C. M., Mills, M. M., Achterberg, E. P., Geider, R. J., LaRoche, J., Lucas, M. I. et al. (2009). Large-Scale Distribution of Atlantic Nitrogen Fixation Controlled by Iron Availability. Nature Geoscience, 2, 867-871. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo667</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Noriega, C., &amp; Araujo, M. (2014). Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Estuaries of Northern and Northeastern Brazil. Scientific Reports, 4, Article No. 6164. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06164</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Noriega, C., Araujo, M., Lefevre, N., Montes, M. F., Gaspar, F., &amp; Veleda, D. (2015). Spatial and Temporal Variability of CO2 Fluxes in Tropical Estuarine Systems near Areas of High Population Density in Brazil. Regional Environmental Change, 15, 619-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0671-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olivier, L., Boutin, J., Reverdin, G., Lefèvre, N., Landschützer, P., Speich, S. et al. (2021). Impact of North Brazil Current Rings on Air-Sea CO2 Flux Variability in Winter 2020. Biogeosciences Discussions, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-269</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oudot, C., Ternon, J.-F., &amp; Lecomte, J. (1995). Measurements of Atmospheric and Oceanic CO2 in the Tropical Atlantic: 10 Years after the 1982-1984 FOCAL Cruises. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 47, 70-85. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v47i1-2.16032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Queiroz, A. R., Montes, M. F., Castro Melo, P. A. M., Silva, R. A., &amp; Koening, M. L. (2015). Vertical and Horizontal Distribution of Phytoplankton around an Oceanic Archipelago of the Equatorial Atlantic. Marine Biodiversity Records, 8, e155. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175526721500130X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riebesell, U., Zondervan, I., Rost, B., Tortell, P. D., Zeebe, R. E., &amp; Morel, F. M. (2000). Reduced Calcification of Marine Plankton in Response to Increased Atmospheric CO2. Nature, 407, 364-367. https://doi.org/10.1038/35030078</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riul, P., Targino, C. H., Farias, J. D. N., Visscher, P. T., &amp; Horta, P. A. (2008). Decrease in Lithothamnion sp. (Rhodophyta) Primary Production Due to the Deposition of a Thin Sediment Layer. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 88, 17-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315408000258</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Robbins, L., Hansen, M., Kleypas, J., &amp; Meylan, S. (2010). CO2calc: A User-Friendly Seawater Carbon Calculator for Windows, Mac OS X, and iOS (iPhone). Open-File Report 2010-1280. USGS. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1280/pdf/ofr_2010-1280.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rockstr&amp;#246;m, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, &amp;#197., Chapin III, F. S., Lambin, E. F. et al. (2009). A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature, 461, 472-475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Santiago, M. F., Silva-Cunha, M. G. G., Neumann-Leit&amp;#227;o, S., Costa, K. M. P. Palmeira, G. C. B., Neto, P. et al. (2010). Phytoplankton Dynamics in a Highly Eutrophic Estuary in Tropical Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, 58, 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-87592010000300002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schott, F. A., Brandt, P., Hamann, M., Fischer, J., &amp; Stramma, L. (2002). On the Boundary Flow off Brazil at 5 - 10&amp;#176;S and Its Connection to the Interior Tropical Atlantic. Geophysical Research Letters, 29, 21-1-21-4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL014786</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schott, F. A., Dengler, M., Zantopp, R., Stramma, L., Fischer, J., &amp; Brandt, P. (2005). The Shallow and Deep Western Boundary Circulation of the South Atlantic at 5&amp;#176; - 11&amp;#176;S. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 35, 2031-2053. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO2813.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Schuster</surname><given-names> U.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Gruber</surname><given-names> N. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>. Atlantic and Arctic Sea-Air CO2 Fluxes, 1990-2009</article-title><source> Biogeosciences Discussions</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> 10669</fpage>-<lpage>10724</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, B. J., Gaspar, F. L., Tyaqui&amp;#231;&amp;#227;, P., Lefèvre, N., &amp; Flores Montes, M. J. (2019). Carbon Chemistry Variability around a Tropical Archipelago. Marine and Freshwater Research, 70, 767-780. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF18011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Solorzano, L. (1969). Determination of Ammonia in Natural Waters by the Phenolhypochlorite Method. Limnology and Oceanography, 14, 799-801. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1969.14.5.0799</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stramma, L., &amp; Schott, F. (1999). The Mean Flow Field of the Tropical Atlantic Ocean. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 46, 279-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(98)00109-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strickland, J. D. H., &amp; Parsons, T. R. (1972). A Parctical Handbook of Seawater Analysis. Bulletin 167 (2nd ed., 328 p.). Fisheries Research Board of Canada.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sutton, A. J., Feely, R. A., Maenner-Jones, S., Musielwicz, S., Osborne, J., Dietrich, C. et al. (2019). Autonomous Seawater pCO2 and pH Time Series from 40 Surface Buoys and the Emergence of Anthropogenic Trends. Earth System Science Data, 11, 421-439. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-421-2019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Sweeney, C., Poisson, A., Metzl, N., Tilbrook, B. et al. (2002). Global Sea-Air CO2 Flux Based on Climatological Surface Ocean pCO2, and Seasonal Biological and Temperature Effects. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 49, 1601-1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00003-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Wanninkhof, R., Sweeney, C., Feely, R. A., Chipman, D. W. et al. (2009). Climatological Mean and Decadal Change in Surface Ocean pCO2, and Net Sea-Air CO2 Flux over the Global Oceans. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 56, 554-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ternon, J.-F., Oudot, C., Dessier, A., &amp; Diverres, D. (2000). A Seasonal Tropical Sink for Atmospheric CO2 in the Atlantic Ocean: The Role of the Amazon River Discharge. Marine Chemistry, 68, 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00077-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tréguer, P., &amp; Le Corre, P. (1975). Manuel d’analyse des sels nutritifs dans l’eau de mer. Laboratoire d’Océanographie Chimique, Université de Bretagne Occidentale.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNESCO (1981). The Practical Salinity Scale 1978 and the International Equation of State of Seawater 1980. In Tenth Report of the Joint Panel on Oceanographic Tables and Standards (JPOTS) (25 p). UNESCO Technical Papers in Marine Science No. 36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ussiri, D. A. N., &amp; Lal, R. (2017). The Global Carbon Inventory. In Carbon Sequestration for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation (pp. 77-102). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53845-7_4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Villas-B&amp;#244;as, A. B., Figueiredo, M. O., &amp; Villa&amp;#231;a, R. C. (2005). Colonization and Growth of Crustose Coralline Algae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) on the Rocas Atoll. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, 53, 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-87592005000200005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weiss, R., &amp; Price, B. (1980). Nitrous Oxide Solubility in Water and Seawater. Marine Chemistry, 8, 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(80)90024-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Winn, C. D., Li, Y.-H., Mackenzie, F. T., &amp; Karl, D. M. (1998). Rising Surface Ocean Dissolved Inorganic Carbon at the Hawaii Ocean Time-Series Site. Marine Chemistry, 60, 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(97)00085-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wolf-Gladrow, D. A., Zeebe, R. E., Klaas, C., K&amp;#246;rtzinger, A., &amp; Dickson, A. G. (2007). Total Alkalinity: The Explicit Conservative Expression and Its Application to Biogeochemical Processes. Marine Chemistry, 106, 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.01.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.115557-ref82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhai, W., Dai, M., &amp; Guo, X. (2007). Carbonate System and CO2 Degassing Fluxes in the Inner Estuary of Changjiang (Yangtze) River, China. Marine Chemistry, 107, 342-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.02.011</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>