EBP is a term that was used to represent a systematic approach to improving healthcare and clinical decision-making that is based on the most recent research evidence available at the time. When basing practice on research and evidence, it is critical to convey and accept the evidence; yet, nurses frequently depend on tradition or intuitive processes as the explanation for treatments [1] . A consequence is that nursing interventions may be dictated by what the nurse has already learnt via formal education and practical experience; as a result, differences in practice will be found that are not supported by logic [2] .

Clinical decision-making should be informed by the most recent research information available, which is referred to as “evidence-based practice.” To address evolving clinical difficulties, it may be employed as a problem-solving strategy and as a decision-making framework that takes into consideration the patient’s values as well as the practitioner’s own opinions. It may be used to offer solutions to new clinical problems as they arise in the field [2] . As a result of its influence on nurses’ knowledge and practice, EBP has gained prominence in the nursing profession. Therefore, EBP is increasingly acknowledged as a critical component of improving the quality of healthcare and nursing care services, as well as achieving patient care excellence. As a result, it is widely regarded as an important component of healthcare quality, particularly in the United States [3] .

Nurses’ clinical talents and patient preferences must be combined with the best available clinical data from systematic research, as well as readily available resources, in order to conduct EBP [4] . When it comes to using EBP, nurses must possess a variety of abilities, including the ability to perform literature searches and evaluate evidence [3] . Researchers have discovered that nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding EBP can have a considerable influence on the amount to which EBP is implemented in the clinical setting [5]

It is common for people to believe that evidence-based practice means that intuition and personal experience are no longer valid, although this is not always the case. Several studies, including one conducted in Saudi Arabia to examine nurses’ knowledge, attitude, and practice toward evidence-based practice, found that the nurses lacked the necessary knowledge and practice of evidence-based practice, and that they lacked the necessary attitude and practice [6] .

Different factors related to individual, professional, and organizational characteristics are perceived as barriers to translating evidence-based practice into various clinical applications among nurses, including a lack of access to electronic databases and expensive scientific articles, a lack of knowledge about how to handle those databases and critically appraise research results, a lack of time for documentary research, and the difficulty of transferring research results into practicum settings [7] .

In their study of EBP among nurses, researchers reached the conclusion that the most major obstacle to its adoption is a lack of time to conduct research, as well as to understand and analyze research data [8] [9] .

The purpose of this integrative review is to synthesise existing material regarding EBP among nurses, using the integrative review approach developed by Whittemore and Knafl [10] .

As a nursing resource, an integrated review is a systematic approach to acquiring scientific knowledge that is then evaluated and summarized. It’s comparable to what you’d find in a systematic review. Because it allows for the inclusion of primary research that uses a variety of methodological approaches and study designs for analysis, rather than only randomized clinical trials as the systematic review suggests, this approach differs from the traditional systematic review [10] . Among the components of the thorough evaluation are a critical examination of the data and a determination of the current state of knowledge about the subject of interest [11] .

Each of the six processes of the current review was completed: formulation of a research topic for the review, search for primary studies in the literature, data extraction, assessment of primary studies, interpretation of results, and presentation of the review results [10] . The issue that guided the construction of the review was: What Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices are prevalent in the application of EBP among care nurses in hospitals? The review was conducted to answer this question.

EBP has been a major emphasis throughout the world for many years; both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Commission emphasize that health and social services should be based on the most up-to-date research findings that are currently available [12] . It is vital when it comes to healthcare that evidence-based practice is followed. Current nursing practice may be criticized for failing to take use of the availability of current evidence in order to provide healthcare based on such data and to assess the effectiveness of nursing treatments [12] .

As a result, there will be a lack of implementation of such an issue in Saudi Arabia, which will result in the provision of nursing care that is not based on current evidence, which will ultimately result in a worsening of the overall quality of healthcare that is provided to all patients in the country. It is also possible that failure to adopt EBP may lead to an increase in the complications of some diseases as a consequence of a lack of evidence in the care provided, which might result in an increase in the financial costs of the Saudi healthcare system as well.

Evidence-practice gaps also result in underutilization of proven therapies and overutilization of erroneous treatments, as previously stated. As a result, it is vital to incorporate nurses in evidence-based practice (EBP) and to strengthen the infrastructure for the provision of EBP in order to increase the scientific rigor of nursing care and to modify the quality of nursing care. Accordingly, a better understanding of nurses’ beliefs about evidence-based practice, as well as whether and how they use it, is essential for increasing its use and providing safe, high-quality health care for all patients [8] .

All English-language studies published between 2006 and 2019 were found using the electronic databases Cochrane Collaboration, MEDLINE, CINAHL, AVOID, EMBASE (Science Direct), Science Direct ASSIA (Web of Science), Scopus (Scopus), PubMed (JSTOR), and JSTOR, which were searched between 2012 and 2019. The search was conducted using the keywords evidence-based practice, knowledge-based practice, attitude-based practice, nurses, Evidence-Based Nursing, Nursing, Evidence-Based, connected with Evidence-Based Practice and [Nursing research], as well as [Attitudes toward research] and [Barriers to research] in order to find relevant results. There were several terms that were utilized in regard to LILACS, including [Evidence-Based Nursing] or [Evidence-Based Clinical Practice] in conjunction with and [Nursing Research], and [Attitudes], and [Barriers].

Upon further investigation, it was discovered that 182 of the 220 research articles initially retrieved using the search parameters were irrelevant, and 125 were judged to be duplicates based on the titles of the research papers. In the following step, the abstracts of these 59 papers were reviewed, and 52 papers were chosen to be read in their entirety. After reading all of the submissions, 29 were eliminated from consideration.

The remaining 20 were thoroughly read and reviewed for quality assurance. Six articles were discarded after reading the complete text, and six papers were rejected based on the quality of the writing in the papers themselves. It was decided to include them in the evaluation after thoroughly reading the whole text of eight books (Figure 1). It was only primary empirical research publications that met the study’s inclusion requirements, which included those that had been published in English, were relevant to nurses, had the entire text available, and were published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Table 1 illustrates the findings of included studies in this integrative review. The main aim, design, and measures are also included in the table.

Overall, the findings of the research included in this review revealed that nurses had good attitudes toward EBP, despite the fact that they possessed little understanding of the topic. Researchers have identified nurses’ lack of knowledge of research and statistical processes, as well as their lack of education and experience in research and statistics, as significant factors in their poor performance in EBP [19] [20] . As a result of this research, nurses demonstrate a general deficiency in clinical inquiry production, access to evidence, critical evaluation, and practical application, all of which are crucial to the profession.

Nurses must be aware of continually developing scientific information and have the ability to make critical judgements about such research, according to EBP professionals, in order to carry out EBP procedures [19] . Individual attempts by nurses to increase their EBP competence, on the other hand, are unlikely to yield significant results; as a result, organizational assistance is required [20] . According to the findings of several previous studies, appropriate learning environments and amenities are required for the effective implementation of EBP in nursing organizations [19] [21] .

Organizations require a knowledge management system, information systems, and databases that are linked to nursing in order to obtain the information needed for clinical decision-making as quickly and efficiently as possible. To improve nurses’ EBP knowledge, an educational method that encourages organizational team learning and continual learning opportunities might be implemented. A recent study conducted by [19] stressed the need of employing a learning framework as an alternative to standard lecture methodologies for imparting knowledge. It is recommended that, rather than a lecture-style teaching program, a workshop-based educational program that combines debates and brainstorming sessions be implemented at the ward level in order to achieve this goal. Developing targeted educational initiatives, such as journal clubs on wards that focus on clinical concerns that are specific to each ward, is also crucial to success. A learning organization with an EBP preceptor or a mentorship program for EBP practitioners may also be taken into consideration. It is believed that including the EBP concept into the preceptor training program at the organizational level will aid in the development of knowledge and positive attitudes about EBP among preceptors [21] .

Additionally, encouraging nurses to attend the conference and establishing incentives for them to submit their findings at the conference will be crucial success factors. A training program for human resources, such as EBP mentors, would be required in order for them to function as EBP facilitators and EBP Champions on the ward. As part of the design of EBP education programs, it is necessary to establish and implement a hands-on education component in collaboration with librarians, so that practical performance may now be carried out outside of the EBP concept, or the importance of practical performance should be stressed. In the study by [21] intense training programs such as a four-hour workshop each day, computer-based training consisting of three modules that each take 15 - 20 minutes to complete, and team-based training programs of 2 - 3 hours per week were shown to be beneficial in enhancing EBP knowledge. The creation of EBP-related scenarios for each clinical condition, as well as the implementation of a simulation-based EBP training program, would be two options.

Positivity toward evidence-based practice (EBP) serves as a good basis for designing suitable nursing techniques to improve the implementation of this practice. Nursing attitudes toward evidence-based practice (EBP) and knowledge of its utility in clinical settings are most likely to have been influenced by the Hawthorne observer effect, as well as regular exposure to EBP workshops and training programs, according to the findings [22] [23] .

The research covered in this study has been published for more than five years, and it is vital to inspire fresh research to determine whether there have been any changes in hospital nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and actions in EBP during that time period. Alternatively, the most significant health (PubMed) and nursing (CINAHL) databases were selected as a backup option. As a result of the limited number of studies included in this review, it is possible that there will be gaps in the scientific production of findings on knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors in the implementation of EBP among nursing assistants working in hospitals, as only cross-sectional studies were included in this review. Given the small number of studies included in this evaluation, this may not be a major source of concern.

Despite the fact that hospital nurses have positive attitudes toward evidence-based practice and believe that research contributes to nurses’ advancement, developing an evidence-driven role from scientific research is a global challenge; this is especially true when considering that the most frequently used terms as sources of evidence by hospital nurses are: personal experience and local care protocols. More research on this topic is recommended in order to identify and compare the factors that may influence EBP knowledge, attitude, and practices around the world in order to identify similarities that can support global strategies for the transfer of research results to the nursing side of the bed hospital.

The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Zammar, A.M.A. (2022) Nurses’ Knowledge and Attitude Regarding Evidence-Based Practice: An Integrative Review. Open Journal of Nursing, 12, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2022.122007