<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2022.131006</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-114897</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Variety and Growth Regulator Concentration on Success of Air Layering in Plum
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shailendra</surname><given-names>Nath Mozumder</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Md.</surname><given-names>Iqbal Haque</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Md.</surname><given-names>Masudul Haque</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dristi</surname><given-names>Sarkar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muhammad</surname><given-names>Shahiduzzaman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Bangladesh Maize and Wheat Research Institute, Nashipur, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Regional Spices Research Center, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>01</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>65</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>22,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The experiment was conducted at the Regional Spices Research Center, BARI, Gazipur during June 2016 to October 2017 to evaluate the effect of genotype and growth regulator (IBA) on the success and performance of plum air layering. Air layering was done on two plum varieties (BARI Alubokhara-1 and PD Gaz 004) using seven levels of IBA concentration (viz. 0, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000 and 6000 ppm) under a complete randomized (factorial) design (CRD). Significant variation was observed on rooting, establishment and death of layers due to variety and IBA concentrations except rooting and separation time. The un-fruiting line PD Gaz 004 showed outstanding performance in rooting and survivability of layers over BARI Alubokhara-1. Poor rooting and lower establishment caused very high mortality of layers in BARI Alubokhara-1. Rooting and survivability, number of roots, length of roots and leaf production increased with the increasing levels of IBA concentration up to 5000 ppm. The maximum (10 out of 10) rooting success of layer with 65.83% and 59.17% establishment from PD Gaz004 was obtained when 3000 and 4000 ppm IBA was used, respectively. In BARI Alubokhara-1, the highest rooting success (3.08), establishment rate (29.42%), number of root (4.28/layer) and root length (5.08 cm) were recorded with 4000 ppm IBA concentration.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Growth Regulator</kwd><kwd> Layering</kwd><kwd> Plum</kwd><kwd> Success</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Alubokhara or Plum (Prunus domestica) is a valued species in the family Rosaceae native to Europe and Asia. Prunus domestica is believed to have originated in the area of the Caucusus and Asia Minor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref1">1</xref>]. Plums and their juice contain mild laxatives including phenolic compounds, sorbitol, dietary fiber that are thus common home remedies for constipation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref2">2</xref>]. Plums also have a high antioxidant content which retards aging [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref3">3</xref>]. In Bangladesh, the demands of plum usually meet up by importing from other countries like India, China, Turkey, South Korea and Pakistan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref4">4</xref>]. After several years evaluation of various germplasm, one was found superior in respect of adaptability, yield and yield attributes, quality, pest and disease tolerance and released as “BARI Alubokhara-1” from the Spices Research Center of Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute in 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref5">5</xref>]. This variety produces more number of fruits (1221/plant/year) in June-July and yielded 10.29 kg/plant or 6.43 t/ha. Fruits are attractive dark red colored, sour sweet taste (TSS 10.6%), medium size (3 &#215; 2.74 cm, 8.67 g) and globular shape having high nutritive and medicinal properties. This variety performed well in past five years and adopted well in the environment of Bangladesh with low disease and pest infestation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref4">4</xref>]. The description of BARI Alubokhara-1 is published in the BARI website http://www.bari.gov.bd/ and broadcasted several times on Bangladesh Television in 2014 to 2016. Huge demands of saplings are observed after mass media broadcasting and website publication. Vegetative propagation is essential to disseminate this variety for increasing its cultivation maintaining genetic purity of the variety. Air layering and cutting are most used and popular means of Alubokhara propagation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref6">6</xref>]. In rainy season of Bangladesh, many fruit plants showed good shoot and root growth in cuttings and air layering. Little information is available on successful use of plant growth regulator i.e. Indole-3 butyric acid (IBA) for root initiation in Plums in various countries, but no such reports are available in Bangladesh condition. IBA 1000 mg&#183;L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> was the best in the rooting of plum cuttings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref7">7</xref>]. Vegetative propagation using IBA is eco-friendly and no harmful reports so far are known on use of IBA for cuttings and layering establishment. The alternate way of vegetative propagation is grafting on seedlings of the same species. But Alubokhara seeds showed shy germination and death rate of germinated seedlings are very high. Therefore, the present study was designed for development of a successful vegetative propagation of plum with a view to increase its production and profitability through rapid dissemination of BARI Alubokhara-1. The main objectives of experiment were:</p><p>1) Standardization of IBA concentration for air layering propagation techniques of Alubokhara (plum) in the environmental condition of Bangladesh.</p><p>2) To increase success of layering using growth regulators and appropriate variety.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The experiment was conducted at the Regional Spices Research Center, BARI, Gazipur located in about 40 km North to Dhaka city with 23˚59'29&quot; North latitude and 90˚24'50&quot; East longitude and an elevation of 8.50 m from the sea level during June 2016 to October 2017. The experiment was conducted using a complete randomized design (factorial) using two factors comprising two plum varieties/lines (BARI Alubokhara-1 and PD Gaz 004) and seven levels of IBA concentration (0, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000 and 6000 ppm). Soil mixture was prepared with 50% loamy soil and 50% well decomposed cow dung and kept for 2 weeks before use for layering. Treatment wise hormone solution was taken with a dropper bottle and applied 3/4 drops on the cut surface (from where bark was removed) of the shoot. No hormone was applied for control treatment. Each replication of a single treatment was consisting of 10 layering shoots and a total of 30 for 3 replications was used for each treatment and tagged properly. A total of 420 layering were done for seven IBA concentrations. The cut portions was surrounded with 150 - 200 g of moist soil mixture, covered with polythene and tied tightly with jute rope thus called the “stool” or “mount”. When a number of roots were established and seen over polythene, the air layering seems suitable to separate from the mother plant. A half cut was given at 2 - 3 cm below the cut portion or just below the stool of air layering. After one week the layering was separated by final cut from the previous cut place and extra branches and leaves were trimmed out. The trimmed layering shoot was planted in previously prepared 7&quot; &#215; 10&quot; polythene bag removing the layering polythene and kept one week under shade followed by 2 weeks in partial shade for establishment. When a number of roots and shoots were established, the air layering seems suitable to plant in the field. Data on length and number of roots per layering was counted breaking the stool at time of separation while success of detached layers and number of leaves was counted at 30 days after separation. The sample of 5 layers was broken and the numbers of roots were counted and lengths of roots were measured with a digital slide calipers. After separation from the mother plants, success of detached layers and number of leaves were counted at 30 days of planting in the polythene bag. The data were compiled properly and analyzed statistically by MSTAT and MS-Excel Program and mean comparison was done following Dancan’s Multiple Range Test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref8">8</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Both the factors, variety and growth regulator showed different extent of variations in respect of rooting time and success as well as growth of root and shoot in plum layering during two years experimentation.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Effect of Variety on Success of Air Layering</title><p>BARI Alubokhara-1 was significantly reluctant in rooting compared to the line PD Gaz 004 for successful layering (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). BARI Alubokhara-1 took more time for rooting (41.15 days) and separation (51.8 days) while PD Gaz-004 showed early rooting (33.9 days) and separation (44.2 days). The maximum number of successful layers (8.77) was recorded in PD Gaz-004 but it was much</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of variety on success on rooting time and success of plum layering</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Days to rooting</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Days to cut</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Successful layers (no)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >% Dead layers</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BARI Alubokhara-1 PD GAZ004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.0a 33.5b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.3a 34.3b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.15a 33.90b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.0a 42.5b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.6a 45.8b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.8a 44.2b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11b 9.53a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.40b 8.02a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.76b 8.77a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.89a 4.72b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.14a 9.30 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.65a 7.01b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Significance level CV (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS 3.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 4.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 4.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 4.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 5.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 5.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 12.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 12.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 12.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 14.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 14.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 14.67</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means having same letter(s) or without letter are not significantly different by DMRT. “ns”, “*” and “**” means not significant, significant at 5% and 1% probability level, respectively.</p><p>lower (2.76) in BARI Alubokhara-1 out of 10 layering. The death rate of BARI Alubokhara-1 was very high (61.65%) while in PD Gaz-004 only 7.01% layer was died after separation. Early and profuse rooting resulted less death percentage in PD Gaz 004 while delayed and shy rooting caused higher death rate in BARI Alubokhara-1 may be due to the varietal characteristics under Bangladesh environment.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> showed the varietal effect on rooting, establishment and growth performances of layering. PD Gaz 004 also showed significantly higher establishment rate (61.38%) better rooting (4.38/layer), longer roots (5.46 cm) and leaf initiation (14.1/plant) compared to BARI Alubokhara-1 which had only 22.26% success, 3.76 roots/layer, 4.44 cm root length and 12.1 leaves/layer.</p><p>Better root growth resulted higher success rate in PD Gaz-004 might be due to the cumulative deposited energy because this line flowered only but it does not produce any fruits.</p><p>One the other hand, BARI Alubokhara-1 had profuse bearing with very good number of fruits which used some photosynthetic energy and food materials during fruit production.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effect of IBA Concentration</title><p>IBA concentration had significant effect on the success of layering (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Control treatment and lower dose of IBA took more times to initiate roots compared to higher doses of IBA concentration. Days to separation of layers from the mother plant was very close among the concentration though it was significant at 5% level. The number of successful layer was significantly higher ((≥6)) with the concentration of IBA 2000 ppm to 6000 ppm and it was lower in control (4.29/10). These findings are partially resembled with the findings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref9">9</xref>] where the highest rooting percentage in plum was obtained with IBA treatment of cuttings with 2000 mg&#183;l<sup>−1</sup> during summer. But these findings are differed in respect of IBA concentration with the report [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref7">7</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref10">10</xref>] who obtained the highest success using 1000 ppm IBA in plum cutting and layering. Another findings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref11">11</xref>] showed he maximum success (87.5%) of plum cuttings from 1500 ppm K-IBA solution.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of variety on establishment and growth performance of plum layering</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >% Established</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >No. of roots/layer</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Length of root (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Leaves/plant</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BARI Alubokhara-1 PD GAZ004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.00b 51.81a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.52b 70.95a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.26b 61.38a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5b 4.5a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.01 4.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.76 4.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.16b 5.63a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.72 5.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.44b 5.46a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.20b 13.10a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.00 15.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.10b 14.10a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Significance level CV (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 14.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 15.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 14.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS 11.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS 5.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS 8.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 9.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS 4.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 7.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 12.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS 5.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 9.14</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means having same letter(s) or without letter are not significantly different by DMRT. “ns”, “*” and “**” means not significant, significant at 5% and 1% probability level, respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of IBA concentration on success of rooting time and plum layering</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >IBA</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Days to rooting</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Days to cut</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Successful layers (no)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >% Dead layers</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.96a 35.92 b 35.25bc 34.63cd 34.17de 33.91e 33.75e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.79a 41.00b 38.75c 38.08c 37.92c 38.17c 37.96c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.38a 38.46b 37.00b 36.36b 36.05b 36.04b 35.86b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.63a 44.75b 44.54b 43.17c 43.29c 43.14c 43.00c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.04a 52.38a 50.92a 50.21a 49.79a 49.71a 49.75a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.84a 48.57ab 47.73b 46.69b 46.54b 46.43b 46.38b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.29d 5.46c 6.33ab 6.25ab 6.50a 6.29ab 6.08b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96d 4.88c 6.04b 7.00a 6.79a 6.33b 6.00b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.63b 5.17ab 6.19a 6.63a 6.65a 6.31a 6.04a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.08a 45.42b 36.67d 37.50cd 35.00cd 39.10cd 39.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.40b 20.25b 24.35ab 28.90ab 30.00a 34.85a 22.75b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.24a 32.83b 30.51b 38.20a 32.50b 35.96ab 30.96b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Significance. CV (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 3.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 4.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 4.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 4.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 5.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 5.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 12.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 12.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 12.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 14.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 14.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 14.68</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means having same letter(s) or without letter are not significantly different by DMRT. “ns”, “*” and “**” means not significant, significant at 5% and 1% probability level, respectively.</p><p>There was significant variation on number of dead layers after separation from the mother plant, rooting and leaf production with various levels of IBA treatment. Indole-butyric-acid (IBA) enhanced root development and root growth by enhancing cell division resulted the maximum success of layering compared to control and lower level of IBA concentration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>IBA concentration significantly affected on the establishment and growth of plum layering (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Higher concentration of IBA resulted more number (≥4) of longer (≥5 cm) roots compared to control and lower concentration of IBA. Number of leaves was increased with increasing IBA concentration up to 4000 ppm.</p><p>The highest number of leaves (13.89/layer) was recorded from the application of 4000 ppm IBA and the lowest (11.07/layer) was found from control. IBA helps to accelerate cell division and root initiation in upper parts of the cut portion of the plant resulted more rooting and leaves with higher doses of IBA. Previous report [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref11">11</xref>] showed that growth regulator enhanced rooting and germination</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of IBA concentration on establishment and growth of plum layering</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >IBA</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >% Established</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >No. of roots/layer</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Length of root (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Leaves/plant</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.50d 27.90c 37.50ab 42.10a 41.30a 37.60b 34.20b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.00d 43.33c 55.00b 61.25a 60.42a 54.58b 52.08b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.25c 35.62b 46.25a 51.68a 50.86a 46.09a 43.14ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.36c 3.71bc 4.30a 4.27a 4.46a 4.25a 4.03ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.83d 4.02c 4.11bc 4.25a 4.29a 4.28a 4.19ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.60b 3.87ab 4.21a 4.26a 4.38a 4.27a 4.11a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.98b 4.47b 5.25a 5.19a 5.43a 5.24a 5.05a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.59d 4.86c 5.02b 5.14ab 5.134ab 5.174a 5.10ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.29b 4.67ab 5.14a 5.17a 5.28a 5.21a 5.08a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.29c 11.03bc 12.71a 11.95abc 12.57ab 11.97abc 11.27abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.84d 14.15c 14.81b 14.90ab 15.21ab 15.37a 11.90f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.07b 12.59ab 13.76a 13.43a 13.89a 13.67a 11.59c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Significance CV (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 14.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 15.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 14.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 11.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 5.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 8.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 9.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 4.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 7.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 12.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 5.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 9.14</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means having same letter(s) or without letter are not significantly different by DMRT. “ns”, “*” and “**” means not significant, significant at 5% and 1% probability level, respectively.</p><p>increasing α-amylase activities in the seeds and plant.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Combined Effect of Variety and IBA Concentration</title><p>Both the variety and line showed incremental rate of rooting and success of layers with increasing IBA concentration up to a certain level (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). BARI Alubokhara-1 took the maximum time for rooting (46.5 days) and detachment (57.1 days) of layers in control treatment (without IBA). Early rooting (32.5 days) and cut time (42.8 days) was observed in PD Gaz 004 with 6000 ppm IBA application. The maximum (9.59 out of 10) rooting success of layer was obtained from PD Gaz 004 with 3000 IBA concentration while it was very poor (0.96/10) in BARI Alubokhara-1 in control. The Highest percentage of dead layers (71%) was recorded in BARI Alubokhara-1 with 3000 ppm IBA and it was the lowest (3.35%) in PD Gaz 004 with 2000 ppm IBA treatment.</p><p>Establishment rate and rooting significantly affected with the combined effect of variety and IBA but number of leaves was similar (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). The highest establishment rate (73.33%) was recorded in PD Gaz 004 with 3000 ppm IBA but it was only 5.42% in BARI Alubokhara-1 without IBA. The line PD Gaz 004 showed better rooting (4.58 roots/layer) root length (5.68 cm) and leaf production (14.60/layer) with higher doses (5000 - 6000 ppm) of growth regulator (IBA).</p><p>The number of leaves per layer at 30 days after separation showed insignificant variation with different level of IBA or varieties. Among BARI Alubokhara-1, the highest establishment rate (34.29.42%), number of roots (4.21/layer) and root length (4.99 cm) and leaves (13.30/layer) was recorded with 4000 ppm solution.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Combined effect of variety and IBA concentration on success of plum layering</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Var.</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >IBA</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Days to rooting</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Days to cut</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Successful layers (no)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >% Dead layers</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BARI Alubokhara-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.9 37.8 37.0 36.3 35.8 35.6 35.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.0a 46.9ab 44.3ab 43.3b 43.1b 43.5b 43.2b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.5a 42.4a 40.7ab 39.8ab 39.5ab 39.6ab 39.3ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.1 52.8 51.9 50.2 50.1 50.0 50.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83f 1.42f 2.67c 2.50de 3.08cd 2.63de 2.17e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08g 2.58f 3.58e 4.83d 4.42d 3.83e 3.50e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96d 2.00cd 3.13c 3.67c 3.75c 3.23c 2.84cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.67a 85.83a 73.33c 75.00bc 69.17cd 73.75bc 78.33b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.0c 33.0c 42.0c 67.0b 50.0bc 58.0bc 33.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.34b 59.42b 57.67b 71.00a 59.59b 65.88ab 55.67b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PD GAZ004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.0 34.0 33.5 33.0 32.6 32.3 32.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.6bc 35.1c 33.3c 32.9c 32.8c 32.8c 32.8c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.3ab 34.6b 33.4b 32.9b 32.7b 32.6b 32.5b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.6 44.4 43.6 43.2 43.0 42.8 42.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.75b 9.50a 10.0a 10.0a 9.92a 9.96a 10.00a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.83d 7.17c 8.50b 9.17a 9.17a 8.83ab 8.50b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.29b 8.34ab 9.25a 9.59a 9.55a 9.39a 9.25a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.50e 5.00f 0.00f 0.00f 0.83f 0.40f 0.00f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.80bc 7.50b 6.70b 10.80ab 10.00ab 11.70a 12.50a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.15c 6.25d 3.35d 5.40d 5.42d 6.05d 6.25d</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Significance. CV (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS 3.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 4.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 4.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS 5.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 12.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 12.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 12.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 14.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 14.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 14.68</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means having same letter(s) or without letter are not significantly different by DMRT. “ns”, “*” and “**” means not significant, significant at 5% and 1% probability level, respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Combined effect of variety and IBA concentration on establishment and growth of plum layering</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >IBA</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >% Established</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >No. of roots /layer</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Length of root (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Leaves/ plant</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BARI Alubokhara-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33g 9.17g 18.33f 18.33f 29.42f 23.33f 17.50f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.50d 22.50d 31.67cd 41.67bcd 39.17bcd 32.50cd 31.67cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.42h 15.84g 25.00f 30.00de 34.29d 27.92e 24.59ef</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.52e 3.08de 4.13ab 3.88bc 4.28ab 3.80bc 3.31cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.69 3.90 4.02 4.13 4.13 4.10 4.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.11b 3.49ab 4.08a 4.01a 4.21a 3.95ab 3.72ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78e 3.36e 4.85bcd 4.64cd 5.09a-d 4.67cd 4.25d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.24 4.57 4.77 4.89 4.89 4.84 4.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.51b 3.97b 4.81ab 4.77ab 4.99ab 4.76ab 4.54ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.70 11.37 13.23 12.65 13.30 12.70 11.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PD GAZ004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.67e 46.67d 56.67bc 65.83a 59.17ab 55.00bc 50.83cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.50bcd 64.17abc 78.33a 80.83a 81.67a 76.67a 72.50ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.09d 55.42c 67.50ab 73.33a 70.42a 65.84ab 61.67b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.21ab 4.34ab 4.48ab 4.65ab 4.64ab 4.68a 4.74a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96 4.13 4.20 4.36 4.45 4.47 4.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.09a 4.24a 4.34a 4.51a 4.55a 4.58a 4.50a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.18abc 5.57ab 5.65ab 5.75ab 5.76ab 5.85a 5.86a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.95 5.14 5.26 5.38 5.37 5.50 5.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.07ab 5.36a 5.46a 5.57a 5.57a 5.68a 5.62a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.40 13.80 14.40 14.18 14.48 14.55 14.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Significance CV (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 14.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 15.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 14.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 11.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS 5.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 8.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >** 9.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS 4.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >* 7.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS 9.14</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means having same letter(s) or without letter are not significantly different by DMRT. “ns”, “*” and “**” means not significant, significant at 5% and 1% probability level, respectively.</p><p>IBA accelerates cell division and root initiation at high humidity and temperature resulted more rooting and leaves with higher doses of IBA in layering. The result from this observation was partially resembled with some findings such as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref9">9</xref>] gets maximum success with 2000 ppm IBA. Another researcher [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref11">11</xref>] obtained from 1500 ppm IBA while [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref9">9</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref7">7</xref>] got the maximum success with 1000 ppm IBA concentration. All the findings were varied because those experiments were conducted in different environment, soils, climates and times. These findings are resembled with the findings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114897-ref12">12</xref>] observed versatile variation of plums rooting with various weather and chemical treatments. Saplings produced from layering of the un-fruiting line PD Gaz-004 is kept for cleft grafting of BARI Alubokhara-1 scions in next season for the production of grafted saplings of BARI Alubokhara-1.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Variety and IBA concentration significantly influenced on the success and rooting of layers under Bangladesh condition. Plum layering using 3000 to 4000 ppm IBA solution seems better for successful vegetative propagation in Bangladesh.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mozumder, S.N., Haque, M.I., Haque, M.M., Sarkar, D. and Shahiduzzaman, M. (2022) Effect of Variety and Growth Regulator Concentration on Success of Air Layering in Plum. Agricultural Sciences, 13, 65-73. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2022.131006</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.114897-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eryomine, G.V. (2013) New Data on Origin of Prunus domestica L. International Symposium on Plum and Prune Genetics, Breeding and Pomology, 283, 4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114897-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mileti&amp;#263;, N., Popovi&amp;#263;, B., Mitrovi&amp;#263;, O. and Kandi&amp;#263;, M. (2012) Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Capacity of Fruits of Plum cv. “Stanley” (Prunus domestica L.) as Influenced by Maturity Stage and On-Tree Ripening. AJCS, 6, 681-687.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114897-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stacewicz, S.M., Bowen, P.E., Hussain, E.A., Wood, B.I.D. and Farnsworth, N.R. (2001) Chemical Composition and Potential Health Effects of Prunes: A Functional Food. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 41, 251-286.https://doi.org/10.1080/20014091091814</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114897-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mozumder, S.N., Hoque, M.I., Akter, S. and Banik, B.R. (2014) Bangladeshe Alubokhara chash (Booklet in Bengali = Cultivation of plum in Bangladesh). BARI Agro. techbklt no. 04/2014., 1-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114897-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anonymous (2014) Annual Report 2013-14. Spices Research Center, BARI, Shibganj, Bogra, p. 169.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114897-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Food &amp; Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2011) The State of Food and Agriculture 2010-2011. Rome, Italy.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114897-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neto M., Telles, U.R., Allan, C. and Antonio, B.L. (2006) Rooting of Hardwood Cuttings from Plum Treated with Indol Butiric Acid. Ciência Rural, 36, 448-452. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782006000200014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114897-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zaman, S.M.H., Rahim, K. and Hawlader, M. (1987) Simple Lessons from Biometry. Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, 29-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114897-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, S.D. and Aier, N.B. (2002) Seasonal Rooting Behaviour of Cuttings of Plum Cultivars as Influenced by IBA Treatments. Scientia Horticulturae, 40, 297-303.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(89)90103-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114897-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Canli, F.A. and Sefer, B. (2009) Effects of Indolebutyric Acid on Adventitious Root Formation from Semi-Hardwood Cuttings of “Sarierik” Plum. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 3, 45-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114897-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andrea, L.S. and Dirr, M.A. (1996) Timing and K-IBA Treatments Affect Rooting of Stem Cuttings of Koch (Japanese Plum). HortScience, 31, 222-223.https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.31.2.222</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114897-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nacheva, L., Nacheva, A., Rankova, Z., Gercheva, P. and Zlatev, Z. (2012) Stress Responses of the Cherry Dwarf Rootstock Gisela 5-Prunus cerasus L. × Prunus canescens L. Fruit Growing Institute, Agricultural University, Plovdiv.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>