<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2022.121009</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-114892</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnant Women with Heart Disease in Three Yaound&#233; Referral Hospitals
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jean</surname><given-names>Dupont Kemfang Ngowa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Calixte</surname><given-names>Galilée Fotsing Kengne</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christiane</surname><given-names>Nsahlai</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Boombhi</surname><given-names>Jérôme</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Felix</surname><given-names>Essiben</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wilfried</surname><given-names>Loic Tatsipie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jovanny</surname><given-names>Tsuala Fouogue</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pascal</surname><given-names>Foumane</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Maternal Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences of the University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences of the University of Yaounde 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences of the University of Yaounde 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>01</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>93</fpage><lpage>103</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Heart disease in pregnancy is the cause of significant maternal and perinatal morbidity. We wanted to evaluate the maternal and perinatal outcomes 
  
  of pregnant women with heart disease in Yaound&#233;, Cameroon. This was a cross sectional study with retrospective data collection of 45 pregnancies in 42 women with heart disease followed at three Yaound&#233; referral hospitals in Yaound&#233;, Cameroon from January 1
  <sup>st</sup>
   2015 to December 31
  <sup>st</sup>
   2020. We collected data on maternal obstetrical and perinatal outcomes. The frequency of pregnancies with heart diseases was 0.1%. The mean maternal age was 29.05 &#177; 6.5 years. At first antenatal visit, all patients were in class I (84.4%) and II (15.6%) of the New-York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Valvular heart disease (51.1%) was the most common type followed by cardiomyopathy (37.7%). Over half of the deliveries were vaginal (51.1%). A cesarean section was generally indicated for the usual obstetrical reasons (54.5%) and for heart disease (31.8%). Complications included 17 (37.7%) cases of heart failure, 6 (13.3%) cases of pulmonary edema, 2 (04.4%) cases of pulmonary 
  embolism, 3 (06.6%) maternal deaths and 3 (06.3%) perinatal deaths, 14 (29.7%)
   premature births and 3 cases of (6.3%) intrauterine growth retardation. The maternal deaths were cases complicated by pulmonary edema and all had di
  lated cardiomyopathy. The maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with heart disease 
  are
   marked in our environment by increased
   morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the prenatal, per partum and postpartum management of this high-risk group.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Heart Disease</kwd><kwd> Pregnancy</kwd><kwd> Perinatal</kwd><kwd> Delivery</kwd><kwd> Cesarean Section</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Heart disease involves a broad spectrum of pathologies which might be congenital or acquired, functional or structural, cyanotic or acyanotic, or may include endocardial, myocardial or pericardial defects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>Cardiac diseases in pregnancy are rare. In the 1930s, it was estimated that 1% to 2% of all pregnancies were complicated by maternal cardiac disease and that 6% of these women died during pregnancy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref2">2</xref>]. Current estimates of heart disease in pregnancy report a prevalence of 4% in the United States of America and worldwide estimates of 0.1% to 1.4% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref4">4</xref>]. Congenital heart disease is reported to be the most common cause of cardiac disease in pregnant women in developed countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref5">5</xref>]. A major reason for this increase is that recent advances in medical and surgical treatment have improved long-term outcomes of children with congenital heart disease and consequently, more women with congenital heart disease are reaching childbearing age and conceiving [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref5">5</xref>]. Sub-Saharan Africa is characterized by a high prevalence of rheumatic fever and rheumatic valvular heart disease (VHD). Prevalence of rheumatic heart disease has been estimated at two to three cases per 1000 among school-age children in Africa who underwent clinical screening, and was recently reported to be about 10 fold higher if they also had an ultrasound examination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>Pregnancy leads to increased cardiac output, as a result of increased heart rate and stroke volume, increased circulating blood volume and decreased peripheral vascular resistance. At the time of delivery, uterine contraction and maternal effort further increase cardiac output. These hemodynamic changes might result in adverse maternal and fetal outcomes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref8">8</xref>]. Cardiovascular modifications during pregnancy can worsen cardiac disease compromising maternal vital prognosis during labor and delivery and even in the postpartum period. Previous studies performed in industrialized countries have shown that pregnancy in women with heart disease is associated with significant cardiac and neonatal complications, despite optimum obstetrical and cardiac care [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref6">6</xref>]. The management of pregnant women with heart disease in developing countries is a medical challenge due to financial constraints, inadequate hospital equipment, cultural and social barriers.</p><p>In Cameroon, no formal study has been done on the subject. We thus set out to evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes of 45 pregnant women with heart disease in three Yaound&#233; referral hospitals.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>This study was a cross sectional study with retrospective evaluation of materno-fetal outcome of pregnancies with heart disease followed at three Yaound&#233; referral hospitals including: the Yaound&#233; Central Hospital, the Gyneco-obstetrics and Pediatrics Yaound&#233; Hospital and the Essos Hospital Center, from January 1<sup>st</sup> 2015 to December 31<sup>st</sup> 2020. We included pregnant patient files with pre-existent or newly diagnosed heart disease during pregnancy approved by a cardiologist based on clinical and paraclinical (echocardiography and electrocardiogram (ECG) anomaly) evidence of heart disease. We excluded pregnant patients’ files which were unusable. Ethical clearance was obtained from the institutional review board of the Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences of the University of Yaound&#233; I and research authorization obtained from the directorate of the above-mentioned hospitals. Thereafter, we collected data from patients’ files during pregnancy, delivery, postpartum and from birth registers.</p><p>In the present study, each pregnancy was considered an independent event in case the patient had been pregnant on different occasions during our study period. Variables were recorded from the antepartum, peripartum and post-partum periods. These included: maternal age, parity, gravidity, monthly revenue, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, cardiac intervention prior to pregnancy, cardiac medication, cardiac lesion type, echocardiographic and electrocardiogram lesion details, the delivery mode and materno-fetal outcome. Maternal outcome was assessed based on complications during pregnancy, labor, postpartum or maternal death. Perinatal outcome (preterm birth, birth weight, Apgar score, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), neonatal respiratory distress, still birth and neonatal death) was noted in each case.</p><p>Data collected were entered in CSPro 7.3 and analysed with SPSS 23.0. Data were presented as frequencies, proportions and mean &#177; S.D. Statistical significance was considered at the 95% confidence level (p &lt; 0.05). The x<sup>2</sup>-test was applied for the association between certain variables and materno-fetal outcome.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>We recorded 45 cases of pregnant women with heart disease from 45,546 deliveries giving a frequency of 0.1% heart disease during pregnancy. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the basic maternal characteristics. The mean maternal age was 29.05 &#177; 6.5 years with a modal age class of 30 - 35 years and ages ranging between 18 and 44 years. A little more than half of patients (53.3%) earned less than 100 USD per month with a few of them having a health insurance coverage (only 11.1% of pregnancies were covered by health insurance). Heart disease was diagnosed before pregnancy in 55.6% of cases. At first antenatal visit, all patients were in class I or II of the NYHA functional class.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows heart disease distribution. Valvular heart disease (51.1%) was the most common type of heart disease followed by cardiomyopathy (37.7%). Mitral insufficiency (33.3%) was the most common valvular lesion while dilated cardiomyopathy (24.4) was the most common cardiomyopathy type. We had one case of ventricular tachychardia and one case of ventricular extra-systoles.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Mode of Delivery</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the different modes of delivery and indications of cesarean section. About half of deliveries were by the vaginal route and none of these were instrumental. Most of the cesarean sections were done for the usual obstetrical reasons. In 31.8% cardiac disease was the only indication for a cesarean delivery. Labor induction was done in 12.9% of cases.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Basic maternal characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number; N = 45</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Age (years)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[15 - 25[</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[25 - 35[</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[35 - 45[</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Estimated monthly revenue of patients (USD)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 - 300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 - 500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Health insurance coverage during pregnancy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Obstetrical history</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Time of heart disease discovery with respect to current pregnancy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Before pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >During pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Postpartum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >NYHA functional class at first ANC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Heart diseases treatment before pregnancy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgical treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>NYHA: New York Heart Association functional class; ANC: antenatal care.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of study population according to heart disease type 2</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Heart disease type</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number; N = 45</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Valvular heart disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Mitral stenosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Mitral insufficiency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Aortic stenosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Aortic insufficiency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congenital heart disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ventricular septal defect</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Patent ductus arteriosus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cardiomyopathy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dilated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypertrophic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peripartum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arrhythmia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Ventricular tachycardia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Ventricular extrasystoles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ischemic heart disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Association of heart disease type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >VHD + IHD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >VHD + CM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CM + arrythmia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>CM: cardiomyopathy; VHD: valvular heart disease.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Mode of delivery and Cesarean section indications</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number; N = 45</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mode of delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vaginal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cesarean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Indication of C/S; n = 22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obstetrical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-eclampsia/eclampsia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fetal distress</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cephalopelvic disproportion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cardiac disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obstetrical + cardiac disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type of labor; n = 31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spontaneous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Induction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Induction method of labor; n = 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pharmacologic (misoprostol)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pharmacologic + mechanical (foley catheter)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>C/S: cesarean/section.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Maternal Outcome</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows the maternal outcomes of pregnancies with heart diseases in our study. We recorded 17 heart failures cases, 6 pulmonary edema cases and 2 thrombo-embolic events. As concerns obstetrical complications, pre-eclampsia was most common followed by post-partum hemorrhage. Also, we noted 3 maternal deaths (06.6%). All three women died in a context of pulmonary edema and all had a dilated cardiomyopathy.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Perinatal Outcome</title><p>Perinatal outcome is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. The mean gestational age (SD) at delivery was 35.77 weeks &#177; 5 with maximum and minimum of 21 and 41 weeks, respectively. The mean birth weight was 2780.36 &#177; 647 g. Most newborns (76.5%) weighed &gt; 2.5 kg. Furthermore, we recorded 14 preterm deliveries (29.7%), 3 IUGR (06.3%), 3 newborns had RDS (06.3%) at delivery and 3 perinatal deaths (06.3%) occurred. One congenital anomaly (laparoschisis) case was recorded. Ten percent of newborns had an Apgar score less than 7 requiring neonatal intensive care unit admission.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Factors Associated to Materno-Fetal Outcome</title><p>There is an association between heart disease type and the occurrence of preterm delivery, and between maternal death and heart disease type (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p><p>Concerning the association between materno-fetal outcome and NYHA functional class, there is no significant association between these two variables. Preterm delivery is more frequent in NYHA II than NYHA I but this difference is not statistically significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Maternal outcome, N = 45</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >During pregnancy n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >During delivery; n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Postpartum; n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >All cases</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Medical complications</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart failure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (15.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (11.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (11.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (37.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pulmonary edema</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (02.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (02.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (08.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (13.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thrombo-embolic event</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (4.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (04.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart failure + Pulmonary edema</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (2.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (02.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (80)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37 (82.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (80)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Obstetrical complications</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-eclampsia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (13.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (24.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (37.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eclampsia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (02.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (02.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Postpartum hemorrhage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (08.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (08.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wound Infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (02.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (02.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (13.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (13.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal death</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (06.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (06.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (62.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Perinatal outcome</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Perinatal outcome</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number; N = 47</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total newborns</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Live born</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perinatal death</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Birth weight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Birth weight &lt; 2500 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Birth weight &gt; 2500 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Period of delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Preterm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Term</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post term</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fetal complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IUGR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RDS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congenital anomaly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apgar score 5<sup>th</sup> min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>IUGR: intra uterine growth retardation; RDS: respiratory distress syndrome.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Association between heart disease type and materno-fetal outcome</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >VHD n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CHD n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CM n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IHD n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Arrhythmia n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal outcome</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart failure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (21.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (52.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.228</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pulmonary edema</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (17.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.437</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thrombo-embolic event</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (5.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.335</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal death</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (17.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.048</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perinatal outcome</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Preterm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (47.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (33.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (23.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.045</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perinatal deaths</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (11.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (5.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IUGR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (17.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RDS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (11.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (16.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congenital anomaly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (16.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>IUGR: Intra Uterine Growth Retardation; RDS: Respiratory Distress Syndrome, CHD: Congenital Heart Disease; CM: cardiomyopathy; VHD: valvular heart disease; IHD: Ischemic Heart Disease.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Association between materno-fetal outcome and NYHA functional class</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NYHA I n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NYHA II n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NYHAIII n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NYHAIV n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal outcome</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart failure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (26.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (28.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.904</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pulmonary edema</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (10.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (14.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.771</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thrombo-embolic event</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (5.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.535</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal death</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (5.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (14.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.379</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perinatal outcome</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Preterm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (23.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (71.42)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perinatal deaths</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (8.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (14.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IUGR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (8.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RDS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (8.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congenital anomaly</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (2.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>In the present study we found that the materno-fetal outcome of pregnancies with disease was generally poor in our setting. Our study population showed a frequency 0.1% of heart disease in pregnancy. This result is close to those found by Khemiri et al. in Tunisia (0.285%) and Lima et al. in the U.S (0.2%). Meanwhile, other authors such as Diao et al. in Senegal report a 2.7% rate of heart disease rate in pregnancy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref11">11</xref>]. This high rate could be explained by the difference in the study populations; Diao et al. carried out their study in a specialized cardiology unit and reported the frequency with respect to this population group, compared to ours which was carried in an obstetrics unit and the frequency calculated with respect to the number of deliveries.</p><p>The mean age in our study population was 29.05 &#177; 6.5 years. This young age corresponds to data found in literature where the mean age at first birth in Cameroon is 20.1 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>The financial accessibility to health care is a major problem in the African milieu. Social health care insurance is absent and thus patients are responsible for all healthcare related expenses. In the present study, only a few pregnancies were covered by health insurance and most patients had an estimated monthly revenue less than 100 USD. This goes along the same line with limited access to healthcare services in African settings due to multiple reasons including that of low socio-economic level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>Valvular lesions are usually the consequence of poorly treated rheumatic fever. Valvular heart disease (46%) was the most common heart disease type found which is similar to those found in other African countries and different from those in developed countries where CHD were most frequent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref15">15</xref>]. In contrast to developed countries, the high rate of valvular heart disease could be explained by the higher rate of rheumatic fever in the African setting as a result of low primary prevention during procedures and poor management of patients with rheumatic fever which could lead to heart lesions.</p><p>Delivery is a critical period of the occurrence of cardiac complications in pregnant women with heart disease. Scientific organizations recommend vaginal delivery, with shortening of the expulsion period, be the mode of delivery of choice in this group of women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref17">17</xref>]. In this study, cesarean delivery represented 48.9% of cases, with non-obstetrical indications representing 31.8% thereof, and vaginal delivery 51.1%, none of which was instrumental. Our cesarean rate is slightly greater than those reported by other authors such as Diao et al. in Senegal, Subbaiah et al. in India, Bonnet et al. in France having 37%, 30%, 37% cesarean section rates, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref18">18</xref>]. The high cesarean rate in our study could be explained by the high rate of non-obstetrical indications and also due to a lack of multidisciplinary management of patients during delivery (absence of a cardiologist). This situation results in more indications of cesarean section by the obstetrician because of the heart disease and its complications.</p><p>Previous studies in industrialized countries have shown that the increased risk associated with pregnancy in women with heart disease depends on the underlying cardiac condition, and the presence of risk factors, such as, older age, tobacco smoking, multiple gestations, anticoagulant therapy, poor functional class, cyanosis and left heart obstruction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref23">23</xref>]. Maternal and fetal death are the worst outcomes we can get during pregnancy which should be avoided by preventive and curative measures. In the present study we noted 3 maternal deaths which were all secondary to pulmonary edema and these women all had a dilated cardiomyopathy. Also, we registered 3 perinatal deaths and a late abortion case in our study. These results challenge us to improve patient care and follow-up in our environment. There should be a multidisciplinary follow-up of these patients during labor including an obstetrician, neonatologist, cardiologist, anesthesiologist and improvement of technical facilities (provision for oxygen availability and resuscitation equipment in the different rooms).</p><p>We observed a significant association between heart disease types and prematurity, and between maternal death and heart disease types. Our results are similar to those reported by several authors in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114892-ref14">14</xref>]. Our study had several limitations. It was a retrospective cohort study using administrative data. Data on maternal-fetal outcome were not always complete. However, the present study provided data on maternal-fetal outcome of pregnancies complicated by heart disease in our setting.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>There are adverse materno-fetal outcomes of pregnant women with heart disease in our setting as seen by the high maternal and neonatal mortality rate. Valvular lesions are the most common heart disease type in pregnant women in our setting. Dilated cardiomyopathy is the most frequent heart disease type associated with maternal death. The Cesarean rate is high amongst these pregnant women with heart disease in our setting in contrast to the different scientific society recommendations. There is a great need to set up a multidisciplinary management of pregnant patients with heart disease in our setting to improve the outcome of these pregnancies. There is also a need to improve the infrastructure in our different referral hospitals for better management of these pregnancies with high risk of materno-fetal complications.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ngowa, J.D.K., Kengne, C.G.F., Nsahlai, C., J&#233;r&#244;me, B., Essiben, F., Tatsipie, W.L., Fouogue, J.T. and Foumane, P. (2022) Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnant Women with Heart Disease in Three Yaound&#233; Referral Hospitals. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12, 93-103. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2022.121009</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.114892-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Millington, S., Arstall, M., Dekker, G., Magarey, J. and Clark, R. (2020) Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines for South Australian Pregnant Women with Cardiac Conditions between 2003 and 2013. PLoS ONE, 15, e0230459.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230459</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Klein, L.L. and Galan, H.L. (2004) Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 31, 429-459.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2004.03.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martin, S. and Arafeh, J. (2018) Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 29, 295-302. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2018615</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faivre, J., Verroust, N., Ghiglione, S. and Mignon, A. (2009) Cardiopathies et grossesse. Réanimation, 18, 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reaurg.2009.02.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Subbaiah, M., Sharma, V., Kumar, S., Rajeshwari, S., Kothari, S.S., Roy, K.K., et al. (2013) Heart Disease in Pregnancy: Cardiac and Obstetric Outcomes. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 288, 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2730-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diao, M., Kane, A., Ndiaye, M.B., Mbaye, A., Bodian, M., Dia, M.M., et al. (2011) Pregnancy in Women with Heart Disease in Sub-Saharan Africa. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases, 104, 370-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2011.04.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kimbally-Kaky, G., Gombet, T., Voumbo, Y., Ikama-Méo, S., Elenga-Mbola, B., Mbika-Cardorelle, A., et al. (2008) Rheumatic Heart Disease in Schoolchildren in Brazzaville. Médecine Tropicale: Revue du Corps de Santé Colonial, 68, 603-605.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Isogai, T., Matsui, H., Tanaka, H., Kohyama, A., Fushimi, K. and Yasunaga, H. (2018) Clinical Features and Peripartum Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Cardiac Disease: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan. Heart Vessels, 33, 918-930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-018-1137-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, J., Ye, Y., Lu, A., Chen, L., Mai, Y., Huang, G., et al. (2020) Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients with Heart Disease in China. American Journal of Cardiology, 125, 1718-1724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lima, F.V., Yang, J., Xu, J. and Stergiopoulos, K. (2017) National Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Heart Disease in the United States. American Journal of Cardiology, 119, 1694-1700.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khemiri, K., Jenayah, A.A., Boudaya, F., Hamdi, A., Meskhi, S., Sfar, E., et al. (2015) Epidemiological Profile of Cardiac Pregnant Women at Tunis Maternity Center: A Service Experience. The Pan African Medical Journal, 21, Article No. 140.  
https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2015.21.140.5915</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cameroon Mother’s Mean Age at First Birth—Demographics [Internet].  
https://www.indexmundi.com/cameroon/mother_s_mean_age_at_first_birth.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gelson, E. and Johnson, M. (2010) Effect of Maternal Heart Disease on Pregnancy Outcomes. Expert Review of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 5, 605-617.  
https://doi.org/10.1586/eog.10.49</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">European Society of Gynecology (ESG), Association for European Paediatric Cardiology (AEPC), German Society for Gender Medicine (DGesGM), Regitz-Zagrosek, V., Blomstrom Lundqvist, C., Borghi, C., et al. (2011) ESC Guidelines on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy: The Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal, 32, 3147-3197.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr218</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdel-Hady, E.-S., El-Shamy, M., El-Rifai, A.-A., Goda, H., Abdel-Samad, A. and Moussa, S. (2005) Maternal and Perinatal Outcome of Pregnancies Complicated by Cardiac Disease. International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics, 90, 21-25.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.03.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">PTF on Pregnancy (2019) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 212: Pregnancy and Heart Disease. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 133, e320.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003243</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cauldwell, M., Cox, M., Gatzoulis, M., Nelson-Piercy, C., O’Brien, P., Roos-Hesselink, J.W., et al. (2017) The Management of Labour in Women with Cardiac Disease: Need for More Evidence? BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynaecology, 124, 1307-1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14547</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonnet, V., Simonet, T., Labombarda, F., Dolley, P., Milliez, P., Dreyfus, M., et al. (2018) Neonatal and Maternal Outcomes of Pregnancy with Maternal Cardiac Disease (the NORMANDY Study): Years 2000-2014. Anaesthesia Critical Care &amp; Pain Medicine, 37, 61-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2017.01.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hameed, A., Karaalp, I.S., Tummala, P.P., Wani, O.R., Canetti, M., Akhter, M.W., et al. (2001) The Effect of Valvular Heart Disease on Maternal and Fetal Outcome of Pregnancy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 37, 893-899.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01198-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Almange</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2002</year>)<article-title>Pregnancy and Congenital Heart Disease</article-title><source> Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux</source><volume> 95</volume>,<fpage> 1040</fpage>-<lpage>1044</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Drenthen, W., Pieper, P.G., Roos-Hesselink, J.W., van Lottum, W.A., Voors, A.A., Mulder, B.J.M., et al. (2007) Outcome of Pregnancy in Women with Congenital Heart Disease: A Literature Review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 49, 2303-2311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siu, S.C., Colman, J.M., Sorensen, S., Smallhorn, J.F., Farine, D., Amankwah, K.S., et al. (2002) Adverse Neonatal and Cardiac Outcomes Are More Common in Pregnant Women with Cardiac Disease. Circulation, 105, 2179-2184.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000015699.48605.08</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114892-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kologo, K., Millogo, G., Kinda, G., Adoko, H., Kambiré, Y., Thiam/Tall, A., Yaméogo, R., Samadoulougou, A. and Zabsonré, P. (2016) Valvular Heart Diseases and Pregnancy in Delivery Room at University Hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo. Open Access Library Journal, 3, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103201</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>