<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJMH</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Modern Hydrology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2163-0461</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojmh.2022.121001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJMH-114883</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Ocean Forcing on Titicaca Lake Water Volume
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eleazar</surname><given-names>Chuchón Angulo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Augusto</surname><given-names>José Pereira Filho</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Departamento de Ciências Atmosféricas, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosférica, Universidade de S&amp;amp;#227;o Paulo, S&amp;amp;#227;o Paulo, Brasil</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>01</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>10</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>3,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The time series of water level of Titicaca Lake (TL) was compared to the time series of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and El Ni?o/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) indexes between 1914 and 2014 and 1969 and 2014, monthly and daily, respectively. Results indicate TL water level decreased (increased) during positive (negative) PDO phases. ENSO positive (negative) phase results were similar. Positive (negative) PDO and ENSO phases yielded negative (positive) precipitation anomalies and concomitant decrease (increase) of TL water level. These long-term relationships among TL water levels and both oceanic indexes can be useful and prognostic. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>PDO</kwd><kwd> ENSO</kwd><kwd> Titicaca Lake</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The Peruvian Altiplano Region (PAR) is a high plateau at 3800 m altitude surrounded by the western and eastern ranges of the Andes Cordilleras. PAR is part of a larger drainage system with three main tributaries, namely, Poop&#243;, Coipasa, and Uyuni basins that flow into Lake Titicaca [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref1">1</xref>] shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. TL water level has been reduced gradually from its normal level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref3">3</xref>]. The water level varied 5 m between extremes between 1944 (3806.7 m) and 1986 (3811.6 m). TL main water sources are over the lake rainfall (47%) and tributaries inflows (35%), especially from Ramis River [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref4">4</xref>], while the main water sinks are over the lake evaporation (91%) and outflow from Desaguadero River (9%). The surface lake temperature fluctuates between 7˚C and 10˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>Droughts have major societal and economic impacts on millions of people around the world, especially in arid and semi-arid regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref6">6</xref>]. Changes in drought patterns are the focus of many recent studies though uncertainties remain. For instance, simulated TL temperature and precipitation with HadRM3</p><p>and ETA CSS models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref7">7</xref>] suggest a temperature increase between 2˚C and 4˚C and a slight rainfall reduction by the late 21st century. The scenario suggests a 6 mm&#183;day<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> reduction in rainfall rates over southwestern TL in Summer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref7">7</xref>]. However, observed precipitation trends are systematically positive in western and negative eastern, southern and central PAR slopes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>On the other hand, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref9">9</xref>] has shown natural variability such as the one related to ENSO is the primary cause of many episodes of droughts around the world as well as extensive research on ENSO induced dry/wet anomalies over various regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref13">13</xref>]. Nevertheless, the interannual variability between ENSO and the global climate is regulated by the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref15">15</xref>]. It modulates ENSO and its main teleconnections within the intertropics such as over South and North America [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref16">16</xref>], Mexico [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref17">17</xref>], Australia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref18">18</xref>], and East Asia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref20">20</xref>]. Thus, the main objective of the study is to analyze the variability of TL water levels and relationships with the PDO and ENSO episodes.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title>Data and Material Used<p>This work was based on monthly TL water level (m) measurements between 1914 and 2014 and available datasets of thirty-four conventional meteorological stations between 1969 to 2014 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Monthly and yearly PDO and ENSO indexes were used for the respective LT water levels and meteorological datasets. The spectral analysis technique was used to analyze the TL level time series. It provides a measure of the variance in the frequency domain by decomposing the total variance into frequency bands. The total variance results from overlapping mutually independent harmonics.</p><p>The relationship between TL water levels, PDO, and ENSO index was analyzed with a composite analysis of precipitation mean patterns associated with El Ni&#241;o and La Ni&#241;a episodes during the rainy season (DJF). The precipitation anomalies were obtained from the monthly rainfall accumulation mean of all-weather stations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Seven + ENSO (El Ni&#241;o) and eight − ENSO (La Ni&#241;a) were</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> General data analyzed of the meteorological network of the Peruvian Altiplano</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Station</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lat</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Long</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Alt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Station</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lat</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Long</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Alt</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ananea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−14.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4660.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Juliaca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3820.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arapa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3920.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lagunillas</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4250.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ayaviri</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−14.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3920.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lampa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3900.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Azangaro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−14.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3863.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Laraqueri</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−16.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3970.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cabanillas</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3890.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Llally</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−14.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4111.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Capachica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3819.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Los Uros</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3808.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chuquibambilla</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−14.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3910.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mazo Cruz</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−16.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3970.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cojata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4344.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mu&#241;ani</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−14.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4119.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crucero</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−14.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4130.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pampahuta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4320.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Desaguadero</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−16.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3860.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pizacona</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−16.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3940.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Huancane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3860.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progreso</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−14.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3905.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Huaraya Moho</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3890.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pucara</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3885.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ilave</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−16.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3850.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Puno</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3840.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isla Soto</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3853.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Putina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−14.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3878.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isla Suana</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−16.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−68.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3845.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Santa Rosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−14.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−70.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3940.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isla Taquile</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3815.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tahuaco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−16.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3860.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Juli</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−16.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3825.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Taraco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3820.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>identified between 1969 and 2014 based on [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref21">21</xref>]. The PDO index was calculated with SST anomalies of the North Pacific normalized with the average in the period between 1947 and 1995 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref14">14</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title>TL Water Levels<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows TL water level time evolution between 1914 and 2014 relative to an altitude of 3800 m. The water level varied 6.31 m from April 1943 to December 1986. It reached a record high during the 1985/1986 rainy season, causing severe flooding and losses in many cities around TL in Peru [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref22">22</xref>]. Record low levels in the 1940s were caused by successive + ENSO events between 1936 and 1943 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref23">23</xref>]. The time evolution of TL water levels shows no trends but long-term fluctuations with highs and throughout decades. The longer negative water level oscillations occurred between 1933 and 1944 (−6.0 m) and between 1986 and 1997 (−4.2 m).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows three periods of very high evaporation. The decadal-scale depletion of water resulted from droughts when evaporation was increased. The estimated annual average evaporation rate between MAR 1934 and DEC 1943,</p><p>between APR 1963 and DEC 1970, and between APR 1986 and DEC 1996 was 4.82 m, 2.77 m, and 4.43 m or estimated volumes of 4.55 &#215; 10<sup>7</sup> m<sup>3</sup>, 2.64 &#215; 10<sup>7</sup> m<sup>3</sup>, and 4.24 &#215; 10<sup>7</sup> m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref24">24</xref>] showed regional climate scale variation causes water level oscillations related to the changes in net water inflow/outflow, precipitation, and evapotranspiration. A rainy season index was established by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref3">3</xref>] from lake level differences between April and December.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows monthly averages of precipitation and water level for the periods of 1914-2014 and 1969-2014, respectively, similar to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref3">3</xref>]. The water level is minimum in December and maximum in April. The average monthly water level lags three months behind the average precipitation during the rainy season and the minimum level occurs five months after the minimum rainfall in June and July.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows the monthly time evolution of the TL watershed area average precipitation and TL water level between 1969 and 2014. TL water level variations lag behind the average precipitation over the TL watershed.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows the spectral analysis for TL water level a maximum density at 12-year cycle and another smaller one at 6-year cycle probably related to a</p><p>frequency leakage from the first cycle. This peak in spectral density is most probably related to the PDO. This ocean wide forcing is closely related to the 11-year solar cycle.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> shows the time evolution of PDO and TL water level anomalies between 1914 and 2014. Negative (positive) PDO anomalies tend to be associated with positive (negative) TL water level anomalies. For both positive and negative PDO anomalies the TL water level lags behind (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> shows a similar analysis by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref3">3</xref>] for LT water level and the level difference between April and December from 1915 to 2009. In this work, no increase in NLT was detected between 1941 and 1983 for +ENSO events.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> shows precipitation anomalies fields for −ENSO events (La Ni&#241;a) between 1969 and 2014. For strong (moderate) La Ni&#241;a events in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(b) there are positive (negative) precipitation anomalies. Strong −ENSO events induce higher positive precipitation anomalies towards the South over the whole area of TL. For very strong + ENSO events (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(b)), negative precipitation anomalies prevail over most TL basins, and for the moderate events (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(a)), anomalies are slightly positive.</p><p>Therefore, negative precipitation anomalies over the TL basin occur during El Ni&#241;o events. They tend to reduce TL water levels during +PDO phases, similar</p><p>to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref3">3</xref>] for +ENSO events. On the other hand, −ENSO during −PDO phases yields positive precipitation anomalies, especially in the south part of the TL basin.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>This work demonstrates a strong relationship between PDO and ENSO (La Ni&#241;a &amp; El Ni&#241;o) anomalies with the TL water level. La Ni&#241;a events precipitation anomalies are positive northeast of TL basin and for moderate and very strong El Ni&#241;o events, positive precipitation anomalies are found in the central TL</p><p>basin. On the other side [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114883-ref3">3</xref>] suggested TL water level oscillates in response to oceans thermal anomalies in tropical regions and negative SST northern tropical Atlantic Ocean would be related with TL water levels rises. This relationship between TSS and water levels allows us to better understand the PDO-ENSO relationship.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The analysis of the behavior of Lake Titicaca, for the period from 1914 to 2014 by spectral analysis of the TL, shows a period of variability of 12 years that was associated with the PDO climate index. The results indicate an inverse relationship between TL and PDO, with the increase in NLTs being related to the negative phase of PDO. Likewise, the behavior of precipitation in the ENSO events was evaluated through composition analysis since the precipitation is related to the variation of the TL. The analysis showed negative precipitation anomalies in most of the RAP in the El Ni&#241;o years, on the other hand for La Ni&#241;a years, precipitation anomalies were positive. Thus, in the positive phase (negative) of the PDO, with a higher probability of positive phase (negative) ENSO events, precipitation presents negative (positive) anomalies that may be associated with the decrease (increase) in TL.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>E.C.A. received a M.Sc. scholarship from Coordena&#231;&#227;o de Aperfei&#231;oamento de Pessoal de N&#237;vel Superior (CAPES) to develop this research work. A.J.P.F was sponsored by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#237;fico e Tecnol&#243;gico (CNPq) under grant 302349/2017-6.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Angulo, E.C. and Pereira Filho, A.J. (2022) Ocean Forcing on Titicaca Lake Water Volume. Open Journal of Modern Hydrology, 12, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmh.2022.121001</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.114883-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Choquehuanca, H.A. (2011) Lago Titicaca, gran maravilla del mundo, 31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Satgé, F., Bonnet, M., Gosset, M., Molina, J., Lima, W., Pillco, R., Timouk, F. and Garnier, J. (2017) Assessment of satellite rainfall products over the Andean plateau. Atmospheric Research, 167, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.07.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">RonchaiL, J., Espinoza, J., Labat, D., Callède, J. and Lavado, W. (2014) Evolución del nivel del Lago Titicaca durante el siglo XX. Línea base de conocimientos sobre los recursos hídricos e hidrobiológicos en el sistema TDPS con enfoque en la Cuenca del lago Titicaca.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Roche, M.A., Bourges, J., Cortes, J. and Mattos, R. (1992) Climatology and hydrology of the Lake Titicaca basin. In: Dejoux, C. and Litis, A., Eds., Lake Titicaca, Monographiae Biologicae, Vol. 68, Springer, Dordrecht, 63-88.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2406-5_4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, J., Guan, X. and Ji, F. (2012) Enhanced Cold-Season Warming in Semi-Arid Regions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 12, 5391-5398.  
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5391-2012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, J., Ji, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, L. and Gong, D. (2013) An Overview of Arid and Semi-Arid Climate Change. Advances in Climate Change Research, 9, 9-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanabria, J., Marengo, J., Valverde, M. and Paulo, S. (2009) Escenarios de Cambio Climático con modelos regionales sobre el Altiplano Peruano Departamento de Puno. Revista Peruana Geo Atmos férica, 149, 134-149.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Servicio Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología Del Perú (SENAMHI) (2009) Escenarios de Cambio Climático con modelos regionales sobre el Altiplano Peruano. Departamento de Puno, Collao Plateau, 134-149</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trenberth, K.E., Aiguo, D., Gerard, V.D.S., Philip D.J. and Barichivich, J. (2014) 2013. Global Warming and Changes in Drought. Nature Climate Change, 4, 17-22.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2067</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dai, A. (2013) Increasing Drought under Global Warming in Observations and Models. Nature Climate Change, 3, 52-58. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1633</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ropelewski, C.F. and Halpert, M.S. (1987) Global and Regional Scale Precipitation Patterns Associated with the El Ni&amp;#241;o/Southern Oscillation. Monthly Weather Review, 115, 1606-1626.  
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115%3C1606:GARSPP%3E2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dai, A. and Wigley, T.M.L. (2000) Global Patterns of ENSO-Induced Precipitation. Geophysical Research Letters, 27, 1283-1286.  
https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL011140</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dai, A. (2011) Drought under Global Warming: A Review. WIREs Climate Change, 2, 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.81</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mantua, N.J., Hare, S.R., Zhang, Y., Wallace, J.M. and Francis, R.C. (1997) A Pacific Interdecadal Climate Oscillation with Impacts on Salmon Production. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78, 1069-1079.  
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078%3C1069:APICOW%3E2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gershunov, A. (1998) ENSO Influence on Intraseasonal Extreme Rainfall and Temperature Frequencies in the Contiguous United States: Implications for Long-Range Predictability. Journal of Climate, 11, 3192-3203.  
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011%3C3192:EIOIER%3E2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andreoli, R.V. and Kayano M.T. (2005) ENSO-Related Rainfall Anomalies in South America and Associated Circulation Features during Warm and Cold Pacific Decadal Oscillation Regimes. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 2017-2030.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1222</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pavia, E.G., Graef, F. and Reyes, J. (2006) PDO-ENSO Effects in the Climate of Mexico. Journal of Climate, 19, 6433-6438. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4045.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Power, S., Casey, T., Folland, C., Colman, A. and Mehta, V. (1999) Interdecadal Modulation of the Impact of ENSO on Australia. Climate Dynamics, 15, 319-324.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050284</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, L., Chen, W. and Huang, R. (2008) Interdecadal Modulation of PDO on the Impact of ENSO on the East Asian Winter Monsoon. Geophysical Research Letters, 35, Article ID: L20702. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035287</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, J.W., Yeh, S.W. and Chang, E.C. (2013) Combined Effect of El Ni&amp;#241;o-Southern Oscillation and Pacific Decadal Oscillation on the East Asian Winter Monsoon. Climate Dynamics, 42, 957-971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1730-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prado, F.L. (2010) Oscila&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o interdecadal do Pacífico e seus impactos no regime de precipita&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o no Estado de Sao Paulo. Tese de Mestrado en Meteorologia. IAG/Universidade de S&amp;#227;o Paulo, S&amp;#227;o Paulo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sztorch, I., Gicquel, V. and Desenclos, J.C. (1898) The Relief Operation in Puno District, Peru, after the 1986 Floods of Lake Titicaca. Disasters, 13, 33-34.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1989.tb00693.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martin, L., Fournier, M., Mourguiart, P., Sifeddine, A., Turcq, B., Flexor, J. and Absy, M. (1993) Southern Oscillation Signal in South American Paleoclimatic Data of the Last 7000 Years. Quaternary Research, 39, 338-346.  
https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.1993.1040</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114883-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carmouze, J., Aquize, J., Arce, C. and Quintanilla, J. (1983) Le bian énergétique du lac Titicaca. Revue d’Hydrobiologie Tropicale, 16, 135-144.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>