<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJCD</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-5329</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wjcd.2022.121003</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJCD-114770</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Exploring the Role of Nutraceuticals (Red Yeast Rice) in Secondary Prevention: A New Pathway Can Be Opened
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Santiago</surname><given-names>de Dios</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eduardo</surname><given-names>Fernandez Carrion</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Javier</surname><given-names>Antona Makoshi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Juan</surname><given-names>Jose Parra Fuertes</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hector</surname><given-names>Fleites</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eduardo</surname><given-names>Zatarain</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jose</surname><given-names>Luis Zamorano Gomez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Maths, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Department of Cardiology, Hospital Gregorio Mara&amp;amp;ntilde;ón, Madrid, Spain</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario de la Zarzuela, Madrid, Spain</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Cardiology, Hospital Conde Valle-Suchil, Madrid, Spain</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Cardiology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>01</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>24</fpage><lpage>29</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background:
   Long
  -
  term survival in acute coronary syndrome has increased steadily in the last decades. Follow-up studies developed in this patient clearly reveal that they are at risk of suffering a new event, placing them in a new stage, secondary prevention. Assuming this increased risk, the control target of their cardiovascular risk factors become more ambitious. In this field, control of Cholesterol levels, particularly LDL-C, ha
  s
   arisen as a priority objective in patients with coronary arterial disease. In this sense, management of 
  dyslipidemia 
  guidelines, recently recognise
  s
   the role of functional food, highlighting among them 
  is 
  the Red Yeast Rice (RYR). The aim of the study is to establish the potential role of functional food, in secondary prevention
  ,
   while deter
  mining its additional capacity to reduce LDL-C in patients that despite optimal classic treatment (maximum tolerated dose of stain plus Ezetimibe) 
  is
   still out of control objectives. <b>Results and Discussion:</b> 88 patients were included and after 3 months of treatment with RYR, their lipid profiles were compared with the baseline. The variation of T-Col, LDL-C and Trig were statistically significant. A reduction in LDL-C was 10.73
   
  mg/dL, which means a 10.93% of additional reduction over the standard therapy the patients were receiving. Concerning security, no relevant side effects were reported when adding RYR, even in a relevant percentage (35.4%)
  ,
   myalgia disappeared (especially when reduc
  ing the 
  titrating dose 
  of 
  the statin). <b>Conclusion:</b> Adding
   RYR in secondary prevention patients in combination with the usual treatment, seems 
  to be 
  an effective alternative to optimi
  z
  e LDL levels and thus get
  s
   closer to the target set in the
   
  guidelines, without adding relevant side effects, 
  and 
  even improving tolerance to the statins.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Lipids</kwd><kwd> Nutraceuticals</kwd><kwd> Coronary Artery Disease</kwd><kwd> Secondary Prevention</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The survival rate of the acute coronary syndrome has increased in a relevant and sustained way over recent decades. On the one hand, the appearance of new treatments (new antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, new generation of stents), as well as the implementation of clinical guidelines and management strategies (generalization of primary angioplasty, heart attack code), leave us with a new scenario which is initially more favourable; in which our patients survive their first coronary event.</p><p>Follow-up studies of these patients clearly reveal that they are at risk of suffering another event, placing them in a new stage, secondary prevention.</p><p>Assuming this increased risk, cardiovascular risk factor control targets become more ambitious. In this stage, the control of Cholesterol, particularly LDL-C, has become one of the priority objectives in cardiology in patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114770-ref1">1</xref>]. Important studies carried out with statins have shown that reductions in LDL-C have a prognostic impact for which they have become the cornerstone of lipid-lowering treatment, especially in secondary prevention.</p><p>Recently, other lipid-lowering agents (Ezetimibe in the IMPROVE-IT study, evolocumab and alirocumab in Fourier and Odyssey) have shown that reductions in LDL (in addition to or substitution of statins) also achieve reductions in events, and even in mortality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114770-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114770-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Therefore, it seems that regardless of the drug used, if LDL-C reductions are obtained, a prognostic improvement in this group of patients will be achieved.</p><p>In this sense, the guidelines focused on the management of dyslipidemia, including as part of the treatment, along with the use of drugs, the improvement of general measures, such as diet and exercise. Recently, the relevance of so-called functional foods has also been recognized and increased, highlighting among them is Red Yeast Rice (RYR) or berberine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114770-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>Despite the availability of various options for reducing LDL-C, a significant percentage of patients in secondary prevention is outside the control target, explained in part by the frequent intolerance to high doses of existing drugs (statins) or the difficulty in accessing new ones (iPCSK9) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114770-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114770-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>Therefore, it seems relevant to have new strategies available to optimize the lipid profile of patients in secondary prevention.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Objectives</title><p>There is sufficient evidence of the ability of red yeast to lower LDL-C levels in primary prevention, but its efficacy in secondary prevention is currently unknown [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114770-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>The aim of the study is to determine the role of functional foods, in particular red yeast rice, in secondary prevention.</p><p>To determine the additional capacity to reduce LDL-C in patients who, despite optimized classical lipid-lowering therapy (maximum tolerated dose of statins together with ezetimibe), are not within control targets.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Methodology</title><p>It is a prospective observational study.</p><p>Secondary prevention patients were included (had suffered an acute coronary event or had established Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)) and were on statin treatment at the maximum tolerated dose at the time of inclusion.</p><p>Data was collected from clinical history (CVRF, comorbidities, CAD).</p><p>After starting treatment with a nutraceutical composed of red yeast, berberine and Coenzyme Q10, LDL-C levels were compared retrospectively before and after starting treatment with RYR (after 3 months of treatment).</p><p>The appearance (or disappearance) of side effects prior to starting and during treatment was reflected.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussion</title><p>Eighty-eight patients who met the inclusion criteria were included, of which 83 completed the follow-up. The baseline characteristics of the patients are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The mean follow-up was 132 days (&#177;37).</p><p>29.54% of the patients were on concomitant treatment with ezetimibe and 60.22% had received high-intensity statins (atorvastatin &gt; 40 mg, or rosuvastatin &gt; 10 mg).</p><p>In almost 10% of patients, the statin dose was reduced (due to side effects)</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Basal characteristic of the sample population</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hypertension</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >62.5%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stroke</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >11.36</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >27.27%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High intensity statin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.22%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Renal failure</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.95%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Concomitant treatment with ezetimibe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.54%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Tabaquism</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Current</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.36%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Side effects</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >35.22% (87.09% Myalgia)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Former</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.90%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A fibrillation</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >15.90%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Event last year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >CAD</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Stable angina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.31%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Unstable angina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >NSTEMI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.13%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >STEMI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.50%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>when starting RYR treatment.</p>Statistic Analysis<p>The different variables in the blood samples were studied in relation to the lipid profile (to assess the efficacy) and the possible side effects of the treatment (safety): Total cholesterol (ColT), LDL.C HDL.C, triglycerides (Trig), GOT, GPT, GGT, CPK, creatinine (creat), glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbglicA1c), blood glucose (gluc).</p><p>An analysis was carried out using the Wilcoxon non-parametric test (WSR), carried out for a confidence interval of 5%: a p-value &lt; 0.05 rejects the hypothesis that the objective variable has a similar distribution before and after the study.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the changes in the mean values of the parameters analysed.</p><p>The baseline LDL-C level was 97.33 mg/dL. The variation of ColT-LDL-C and Trig was statistically significant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The reduction in LDL.C was 10.73 mg/dL, which means an additional 10.93% reduction over the standard therapy that patients were already receiving. If those patients in whom the baseline statin dose was modified (reduced due to side effects) were excluded from the analysis, the reduction was similar. In fact, exclusively analysing these patients, (they were only 9.1%), they also presented a reduction in LDL.C (12.35 mg/dL, 9.84%), but in this they almost did not reach significance statistics. With this reduction in LDL levels, an additional 16.8% of the patients entered the LDL-C control target, which at the time the study was designed was 70 mg/dL according to the ESC guidelines).</p><p>Col-T was reduced by 10.25 mg/dL. The reduction in Trig was 12.35 mg/dL. There was no statistically significant variation in HDL-C or any other parameter analysed.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Mean value (and standard deviation) at baseline and at the end. Significance value of Wilcoxon Signed-Rank (WSR) test</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Baseline</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Final</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Difference</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Units</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-value (WSR)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T-Col</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >175.47 (31.64)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165.22 (36.21)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/dL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000115</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDL-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.09 (24.02)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.36 (2.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/dL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000017</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HDL-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.9 (15.51)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.21 (15.32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/dL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trig</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125.44 (60.23)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.09 (55.39)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−12.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/dL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00097</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Creat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97 (0.25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99 (0.29)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/dL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HbGlicA1c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.92 (0.56)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.02 (0.95)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/dL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gluc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.23 (17.92)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.58 (23.12)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/dL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GOT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.99 (14.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.24 (10.35)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GPT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.63 (13.23)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.23 (11.49)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123.98 (67.84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124.27 (73.81)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >U/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDL-C (dose change)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.38 (17.61)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.62 (12.98)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/dL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In relation to safety, 35.2% of the patients presented side effects at baseline (mainly myalgia). This is certainly a higher percentage than that observed in other studies with statins, but this is probably due to the fact that the selection of patients for the study has favoured the fact that since they already have side effects, the statin dose titration was not considered (or attempts were even made to reduce it), but the possibility of adding RYR was. In no patient were there side effects or significant alterations at the analytical level of liver function, kidney function, or blood glucose levels. Myalgias were also not reported (no CPK elevation was shown), they even disappeared in several patients (especially when the statin dose was reduced): in 35.4% of the patients the side effects (elevated transaminases, myalgias) that they presented disappeared.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Adding red yeast rice in secondary prevention patients in combination with the usual treatment, seems to be an effective alternative to optimize LDL levels and thus gets closer to the target set in the guidelines, without adding relevant side effects, and even improving tolerance to the statins. Although the number of patients included in the study is undoubtedly limited and it is an observational study, it could represent an alternative for those patients who are not at target levels and are not candidates for PCSK9 inhibitors, or for those whose statin dose may not be titrated or even reduced (and kept on target) for side effects. Randomised studies with a larger population are necessary to confirm these claims.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>de Dios, S., Carrion, E.F., Makoshi, J.A., Fuertes, J.J.P., Fleites, H., Zatarain, E. and Gomez, J.L.Z. (2022) Exploring the Role of Nutraceuticals (Red Yeast Rice) in Secondary Prevention: A New Pathway Can Be Opened. World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, 12, 24-29. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcd.2022.121003</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.114770-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reiner, Z., Catapano, A.L., De Backer, G., Graham, I., et al. (2011) ESC/EAS Guidelines for Management of Dyslipidaemias: The Task Force for the Management of Dyslipi- daemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). European Heart Journal, 32, 1769-1818.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr158</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114770-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cannon, C.P., Blazing, M.A., Giugliano, RP., et al. (2015) Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 2387-2397. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1410489</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114770-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sabatine, M.S., Giugliano, R.P., Keech, A.C., et al. (2017) Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. The New England Journal of Medi- cine, 376, 1713-1722. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1615664</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114770-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cordero, A., Galve, E., Bertomeu-Martínez, V., Bueno H., Fácila, L., Alegría, E., Cequier, á., Ruiz, E. and González-Juanatey, J.R. (2016) Trends in Risk Factors and Treatments in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Seen at Cardiology Clinics between 2006 and 2014. Revista Espanola de Cardiología (English Edition), 69, 401-407. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2015.08.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114770-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Serban, M.-C., Colantonio, L., Manthripragada, A., et al. (2017) Statin Intolerance and Risk of Coronary Heart Events and All-Cause Mortality Following Myocardial Infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 69, 1386-1395. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.12.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114770-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pirro, M., Mannarino, R.M., Bianconi, V., Simental-Mendía, L.E., Bagaglia, F., Mannarino, E. and Sahebkar, A. (2016) The Effects of a Nutraceutical Combination on Plasma Lipids and Glucose: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pharmacological Research, 110, 76-88.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2016.04.021</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>