<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MSA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Materials Sciences and Applications</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-117X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/msa.2022.131002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MSA-114761</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Dye Regeneration Kinetics of C343-Sensitized Nickel Oxide Investigated by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anshebo</surname><given-names>Getachew Alemu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Physics, Faculty of Natural and Computational Science, Samara University, Samara, Ethiopia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>01</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>22</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2022</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) feedback mode has been used to investigate kinetics of dye regeneration in DSSC. Organic dye C343 and CW1 are used as sensitizers for nickel oxide (NiO) photoelectrochemical cells. The influence of film thickness on dye regeneration kinetics in the films for NiO/C343 for six different films was investigated. SECM was used to analyze effective rate constant, 
  <em>k</em>
  <sub>eff</sub> and reduction rate 
  <em>k</em>
  <sub>red</sub>, absorption cross section, 
  <em>Φ</em>
  <sub>hv</sub> for the dye regeneration process. The data reveal a significant variation of 
  <em>k</em>
  <sub>eff</sub> and 
  <em>k</em>
  <sub>red</sub> with a variation of light intensity, sample thickness and dye difference. This research found remarkable dependence of the dye regeneration kinetic parameters on illumination flux, dye types and film thickness of electrode.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Nanoprecipitation</kwd><kwd> PLA</kwd><kwd> Clove Oil</kwd><kwd> Antioxidant</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Recently dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC) have got much attention due to low production cost, flexibility and transparency relative to other solar cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref3">3</xref>]. Until now a lot of research had been done on sensitization of n-type oxides such as titanium dioxide (TiO<sub>2</sub>) and Zinc oxide (ZnO) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref5">5</xref>]. In n-type sensitized oxides an electron is injected into conduction band of semiconductor (n-SC) from the excited state sensitizer. During the past three decades, DSSCs have got much attention as another concept to p-n junction photovoltaics, because they bargain significantly reduced production costs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref7">7</xref>]. Recently P-DSSC, has emerged as new generation of photoelectrochemical cells. In p-type DSSC, the photo-excited sensitizer (HOMO) is reductively quenched by hole injection into the valence band of a p-type semiconductor (p-SC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>The operation principles of P-type DSSC depend on process, the sensitizer excited state dye D<sup>*</sup> injects a hole into the valence band (VB) of the semiconductor leading to the reduction of the dye D. If the charge recombination reaction between D<sup>−</sup> and the hole in the valence band (h<sup>+</sup>/VB p-SC) is slow enough; the reduced sensitizer can be intercepted by the redox mediator (M). The injected holes diffuse to the back transparent conducting electrode (TCO) pass into the external circuit and reach the counter electrode where they oxidize the redox mediator back to its original state [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref11">11</xref>]. A lot of research has been done to explore the parameters that determine the overall performance conversion efficiency and stability. The efforts were made to develop P-type nanostructure films such as NiO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref12">12</xref>], CuO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref13">13</xref>], CuSCN [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref14">14</xref>], CuGaO2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref15">15</xref>], CuCrO2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref16">16</xref>], and K-doped ZnO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref18">18</xref>], with compared to that given to n-type DSSC. Among the P-type semiconductors, NiO has got attention because of wide bandgap Eg 3.6 to 4 eV with good stability.</p><p>Dye regeneration is a crucial step to avoid charge recombination between photo oxidized dye and the injected electron to minimize dye degradation. The interfacial kinetic process is clearly crucial to the operation of a photoelectrochemical cell. In P-type DSSC, regeneration depends on hole injection and recombination of electrons with holes in valance band of p-type oxides. The film thickness can significantly influence the regeneration kinetics and photovoltaic performance of dye sensitized solar cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref20">20</xref>]. The time-resolved spectroscopy (TRTS) was developed to analyze kinetics of electron transfer at dye-sensitized solar cells to describe the rate constant of electron transfer of interface [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref24">24</xref>]. Moreover, scanning electrochemical microscopy has been demonstrated to be an effective technique for determining ET kinetics at various interfaces, including polymer/liquid, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref25">25</xref>] and liquid/liquid ones, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref26">26</xref>] and redox enzymes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref27">27</xref>]. Recently Prof. G. Wittstock group at University of Oldenburg Germany reported scanning electrochemical microscopy is a new tool to study electron transfer at dye sensitized semiconductor/electrolyte interface. They reported ZnO/Eosin Y, ruthenium (II)-sensitized TiO<sub>2</sub>, and ZnO/D149 interface regeneration kinetics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref29">29</xref>].</p><p>In this study, we NiO/C343 films of different film thicknesses were prepared by varying the NiO dip coating deposition method overnight in the C343. In addition, the kinetics of C343 and CW1 regeneration by iodide ions in the electrolyte was studied using an SECM feedback mode approach for different thickness and different illumination intensity. The reduced electrolyte (I<sup>−</sup>) in acetonitrile solvent with supporting electrolyte LiTFS is used as a mediator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref29">29</xref>]. This paper’s first section presented a comparative study of SECM dye regeneration of C343 and CW1 dyes as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The second section discussed SECM kinetic parameters of C343 dye sensitized NiO film with different thicknesses.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Section</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Preparation of the NiO/Dye Film</title><p>Nickel Oxide (NiO) nanoparticles (particle size ~20 nm, 99.9%, Informant Advanced Materials) were ball-milled in ethanol with few droplets of acetate. The mixture of above colloidal solution, ethyl cellulose (Aldrich) and terpinol anhydrous (≥99.5%, Fluka) were sonicated and stirred alternatively to obtain a fine dispersion. A paste was made by evaporating the ethanol from the mixture on a rotary evaporator. FTO glass (Nippon sheet glass, resistance 13 Ω/square) were coated with nickel acetate (+98%, Alfa Aesar) ethanol (≥99.7%, Merck) solution (0.05M) by dip coating and subsequently dried before screen print [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref31">31</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. SECM Apparatus and Procedure</title><p>SECM experiments were performed on cell contained a Pt wire counter electrode and a Pt wire quasi-reference electrode. Positioning was performed with an x-y-z stepper motor system. A Pt wire radius 12.5 &#181;m was sealed into a 5 cm Pyrex glass capillary under vacuum. The UME was polished and shaped conically by a wheel with 180-grid Carbimet paper disks and micro polishing cloths with 0.3 μm for 3 minuties. The UME was sharpened to RG ~ 10, where RG is the ratio of the diameters of the glass sheath and the Pt wire. Before each experiment, the UME was polished with 0.3 μm powder, rinsed with water and ethanol. The sensitized NiO electrode was placed at the bottom of a small volume electrochemical cell and short circuited by a Pt wire to the electrolyte. The emission spectra of the LEDs compared with the absorption spectrum of NiO/C343 and NiO/CW1 film. The LEDs were placed close to the cell and focused on the dye-sensitized film by an objective lens (so that the photo-illuminated spot had a diameter of about (0.0785 cm<sup>2</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref35">35</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3.Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. SECM Measurement of the Dye Regeneration Rate</title><p>According to various applications SECM has been a prevailing technique for probing interface kinetics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref37">37</xref>]. SECM feedback mod based on an ultra microelectrode (UME) to substrate and subsequent its current response as a function of the distance from the surface provide dye regeneration kinetics in sensitized solar cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref41">41</xref>]. In feedback mode scanning probe based on the motion of ultra microelectrode (tip) close to the surface of conductive or non-conducting (insulting) substrate. For the UME, tip reaction for charge transfer reaction and the study state current of given by Equation (1a) and Equation (1b) respectively</p><p>O + n e − → R (1a)</p><p>I T ∞ = 4 n F ( k eff κ ) C r T 2 (1b)</p><p>where, F: Faraday’s constant, n is number of electrons transferred in reaction Equation (1b), k<sub>eff</sub> reaction rate constant, C is concentration of electrolyte, r<sub>T</sub> is UME radius and κ, normalized rate constant.</p><p>The photon induces electrochemical reaction on the NiO/dye surface a change of the tip current as the UME approaches the interface. In order to scrutinize the kinetics of dye regeneration we measured SECM current-distance curves of dye sensitized NiO film with blue illumination in different wavelengths. The effect of illumination intensity on the kinetics of dye regeneration was studied by measuring approach curves at different J<sub>hv</sub>, its value increases clearly as the J<sub>hv</sub> is increased. The kinetics of regeneration by the electrolyte was studied using SECM feedback mode approach on the NiO films with two dyes of C343 and CW1 different intensity as documented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref>.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a) shows the normalized curve at UME to CW1/NiO under blue LED illumination photon flux increased from 2.2 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> mol&#183;cm<sup>−2</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup> to 22.4 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> mol&#183;cm<sup>−2</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup>. The rate constant k<sub>eff</sub> increased from 1.45 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> to 8.18 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> cm&#183;s<sup>−1</sup> in blue LED for CW1/NiO. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b) shows the normalized curve at NiO/C343 under illumination with blue LED at different intensities. The rate constant k<sub>eff</sub> of NiO/C343, increased from 0.92 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> to 4.93 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> cm&#183;s<sup>−1</sup> in blue LED as documented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) shows the normalized approach curve on C343/NiO under red illumination flux density increased from 2.12 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> mol&#183;cm<sup>−2</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup> to 14.7 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> mol&#183;cm<sup>−2</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup> its rate constant k<sub>eff</sub> increased from 2.43 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> to 7.39 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> cm&#183;s<sup>−1</sup>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b) shows the approach curve on NiO/CW1 under illumination with red illumination at different intensities rate constant increased from 1.82 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> to 5.64 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> cm&#183;s<sup>−1</sup> in red LED as documented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref>.</p><p>Generally, according to several studies illuminated dye excited (D<sup>*</sup>) injects a hole into the valence band (VB) of the P-type semiconductor succeed to the reduction of the dye (D<sup>−</sup>). There are a number of reactions mechanism of dye regeneration in P-type DSSCmost likely by 2a-e [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref43">43</xref>]. The regeneration of the dye at the dye-sensitized electrode-electrolyte interface. Therefore, at the illuminated D-sensitized NiO electrode-electrolyte-UME probe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref45">45</xref>]:</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref></label><caption><title> Normalized rate constants k<sub>eff</sub> of CW1/NiO and C343/NiO in blue illumination D = 1.86 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup> cm<sup>2</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup>, r<sub>T</sub> = 12.5 lm, k<sub>eff</sub> = κD/r<sub>T</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >J<sub>hv</sub>/10<sup>−9</sup> mol&#183;cm<sup>−2</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Curve #</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >k</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >k<sub>eff</sub>/10<sup>−3</sup> cm&#183;s<sup>−1</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(a) CW1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.067</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.189</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.214</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.219</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b) C343</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.065</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.205</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.213</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.93</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref></label><caption><title> Normalized rate constants k<sub>eff</sub> of C343/NiO and CW1/NiO in red illumination D = 1.86 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup> cm<sup>2</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup>, r<sub>T</sub> = 12.5 μm, k<sub>eff</sub> = κD/r<sub>T</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >J<sub>hv</sub>/10<sup>−9</sup> (mol&#183;cm<sup>−2</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Curve #</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >k</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >k<sub>eff</sub>/10<sup>−3</sup> cm&#183;s<sup>−1</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(a) C343</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0484</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0457</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0444</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0401</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0342</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0271</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b) CW1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0379</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0363</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0352</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0317</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0271</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.82</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>NiO / D + hv → D * / NiO : excitation (2a)</p><p>NiO / D * → hv D − → h + / NiO : chargrseparation (2b)</p><p>NiO ( h + ) + D − → NiO / D : germinaterecombination (2c)</p><p>NiO ( h + ) / D − + I 3 − → D / NiO ( + ) + I 2 − + I − : regeneration (2d)</p><p>3 I − − e − → I 3 − : regenerationontheUME (2e)</p><p>when illuminated dye is excited there is charge separation and a hole injection into the NiO valence band, and the dye is reduced. Then dye will react with the oxidized species of the electrolyte ( I 3 − ) and regenerate to its ground state. Under illumination excited dye injects holes to valance band NiO oxide (charge separation) represented by Equation (2b) heterogeneous electron transfer (regeneration) I 3 − / D − Equation (2d). In order to rationalize influence of light on dye regeneration we performed measurement at two different dyes in blue LED in different intensity as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the plot k<sub>eff</sub> vs J<sub>hν</sub> for CW1 and C343 sensitized (a) in blue illumination and (b) in red illumination. An experiment values of k<sub>red</sub> = 6.95 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> mol<sup>−1</sup>&#183;cm<sup>3</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup> and Φ<sub>hv</sub>(λ) = 3.16 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> cm<sup>2</sup>&#183;mol<sup>−1</sup> for C343 blue, LED, respectively. An experiment values of k<sub>red</sub> = 7.95 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> mol<sup>−1</sup>&#183;cm<sup>3</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup> and Φ<sub>hv</sub>(λ) = 3.32 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> cm<sup>2</sup>&#183;mol<sup>−1</sup> for CW1 in the blue, LED, respectively <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref>. When the sensitized NiO film back-illuminated, the ground state dye is denoted by D, photo-reduced dyes D<sup>−</sup> and photo excited dye molecules D<sup>*</sup>. The mathematical expression for excited dye D<sup>*</sup> can be derivative from the mass conservation and the steady-state approximations for surface concentrations of the photo excited dye represented by Equation (3a) the reduced dye Equation (3b)</p><p>∂ Γ D * ∂ t = ϕ hv J hv Γ D − k inj Γ D * (3a)</p><p>∂ Γ D − ∂ t = k red Γ D − [ I 3 − ] S 1 / 2 + k inj Γ D * (3b)</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref></label><caption><title> Regeneration parameters for C343/NiO and CW1/NiO in blue illumination</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dye</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >k<sub>red</sub>/mol<sup>−1</sup>&#183;cm<sup>3</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Φ<sub>hv</sub>/cm<sup>2</sup>&#183;mol<sup>−1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Illumination</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C343</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.95 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.16 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blue</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CW1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.95 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.32 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blue</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Thus, the rate constants k<sub>red</sub> for the regeneration of the reduced dye after injection the hole into the valance band of P-type semiconductor by the reduced state of redox at incident light of given by Equation (4). A kinetic analysis rate constant k<sub>eff</sub>, for regeneration processes expressed in terms of reduction rate constant k<sub>red</sub>, absorption cross-section of dye ϕ<sub>hv</sub>, thickness of sample L, dye concentration on NiO film D<sup>o</sup> and electrolyte concentration [I<sup>−</sup>] as</p><p>1 k red = 2 L D o ( [ I − ] ϕ hv J hv + 1 k eff ) (4)</p><p>where, k<sub>eff</sub> represents the regeneration rate, and Φ<sub>hv</sub> absorption rate.</p><p>Due to dependence of regeneration on illumination wave length, result in different values of k<sub>eff</sub> of the different wavelengths. Under illumination of the thin film with blue LED incident photon fluxes the rate constants extracted by fitting k<sub>red</sub> of 7.95 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> mol<sup>−1</sup>&#183;cm<sup>3</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup> for CW1 Φ<sub>hv</sub> of 3.3 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> cm<sup>2</sup>&#183;mol<sup>−1</sup> and 6.73 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> mol<sup>−1</sup>&#183;cm<sup>3</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup> for C343, Φ<sub>hv</sub> of 2.3 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> cm<sup>2</sup>&#183;mol<sup>−1</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. SECM Approach Curves of Different Thickness</title><p>A number of studies on film thickness state to macroscopic characteristics of dye sensitized solar cells parameters depend on the rate of charge transfer reactions. SECM feedback analysis permitted to investigate dye regeneration kinetics at a microscopic sample [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref49">49</xref>]. The film thickness has implicitly affected on the performance of dye sensitized solar cells which increase the accumulation probability, which promotes more light absorption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref20">20</xref>]. In order to investigate the effect of dye thickness absorption spectra of C343 adsorbed on the porous NiO films of varied thickness as shown in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4</xref>). In this work, we used six samples with t thickness (2.8 μm, 34 μm, 3.8 &#181;m, 4.4 &#181;m 5.4 μm, and 5.8 μm respectively). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a) shows absorption spectra of C343 adsorbed on the porous NiO films in different thicknesses. The spectra clearly show broad absorption bands peaking at approximately 490 nm, superimposed to a background signal due to scattering of light by the nickel oxide film. This proves the successful saturation of the films with the dye of the pores for all films. The film thickness is in line with the trend of peak heights in the solid-state absorption on the surface NiO spectra, pick highest for 5.8 μm and minimum spectra pick for 2.8 μm.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b) shows the normalized SECM approach curves recorded with Pt UME (r<sub>T</sub> = 12.5 mm) approaching to C343/NiO films of thickness of 38 μm illuminated at different J<sub>hν</sub>. The k<sub>eff</sub> value obtained at the illuminated C343/NiO film, increases as the J<sub>hv</sub> increased. Increasing J<sub>hv</sub> increased hence k<sub>eff</sub>, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref>. As J<sub>hv</sub> increased from 2.21 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> mol&#183;cm<sup>−2</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup> to 22.4 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> mol&#183;cm<sup>−2</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup>, the cross ponding increased from 1.87 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> cm&#183;s<sup>−1</sup> to 7.73 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> cm&#183;s<sup>−1</sup>. The result revealed that the normalized approach curves depend on the thickness of the film. SECM approach curves of the other films recorded on supporting information. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(d) shows the L (10<sup>−6</sup> m) vs k<sub>red</sub>,Φ<sub>hv</sub> for six samples as shown <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>5</xref>. As film thickness increases the absorption crossection increases because when thickness of sample increases the dye deposition increase, it provides probability of much light absorption as shown <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(d). In contrary as film</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4</xref></label><caption><title> Normalized rate constants k<sub>eff</sub> of C343/NiO for different film thickness in blue illumination</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >J<sub>hv</sub>/10<sup>−9</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S<sub>28</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S<sub>34</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S<sub>38</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S<sub>44</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S<sub>54</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S<sub>58</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>5</xref></label><caption><title> Regeneration parameters Φ<sub>hv</sub> and k<sub>red</sub>, of C343 by I-for different film thickness</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >L/10<sup>−6</sup> m</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Φ<sub>hv</sub>/10<sup>6</sup> (cm<sup>2</sup>&#183;mol<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >k<sub>red</sub>/10<sup>5</sup> (mol<sup>−1</sup>&#183;cm<sup>3</sup>&#183;s<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.713</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.647</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.893</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.457</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.275</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.979</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.979</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.547</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.269</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.947</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.579</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.877</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>thickness increases the regeneration rate constant decrease due to, the dye concentration increases on surface of film, the reaction rate on the sample surface is faster than the UME reaction.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The dye regeneration kinetics were studied on different film thicknesses of C343-sensitized NiO photoelectrodes. The clear difference of regeneration parameters was analyzed for CW1/NiO and C343/NiO, and there was significant variation for both dyes regeneration parameters in different wave length of illumination. It was found that SECM feedback approach curve analysis, considerably different rate constants k<sub>red</sub>, and absorption cross section area Φ<sub>hv</sub> for the C343/NiO were measured for the photoelectrodes of systematically varied NiO thickness. Investigation of SECM kinetic model shows significant different effective C343 regeneration rate constants k<sub>red</sub> and absorption cross section Φ<sub>hv</sub> for C343–NiO electrodes of systematically varied film thickness.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Dr. Anshebo Getachew Alemu thanks Chinese Scholarship Counsel (CSC) for PhD fellowship. The authors thank Prof. Dr. Mingkui Wang, and Prof. Dr. Yen Shen for their helpful comments.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Alemu, A.G. (2022) Dye Regeneration Kinetics of C343-Sensitized Nickel Oxide Investigated by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Materials Sciences and Applications, 13, 22-38. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2022.131002</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Supporting Information</title>SI.1. Fitting of Steady-State SECM Approach Curves<p>Normalized heterogeneous rate constants κ andk<sub>eff</sub> have been extracted from experimental approach curves by fitting them to an analytical approximation of simulated data evaluated by Cornut and Lefrou [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref3">3</xref>]. The analytical approximation of Cornut and Lefrou1 was used for calculating a theoretical current I<sub>T</sub> for each experimental, normalized distance. The formula of Amphlett and Denuault given for RG = 10. Constants for other selected RG are also available [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref4">4</xref>]. Normalized approach curves I<sub>T</sub> vs. L have been calculated from each experimental approach curves i<sub>T</sub>(z) using I<sub>T</sub> = i<sub>T</sub>/i<sub>T</sub><sub>,∞</sub> and L = d/r<sub>T</sub>.</p><p>The fitting of the normalized approach curves yields a dimensionless normalized rate constant k. With the knowledge of r<sub>T</sub> and the diffusion coefficient of I<sub>3</sub> in the electrolyte, an effective heterogeneous first order rate constant k<sub>eff</sub> [cm&#183;s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>] is obtained.</p><p>k eff = κ D r T (1)</p>SI.2. SECM Approach Curves on C343/NiO Sample<p>In NiO DSSCs, visible light absorption by dyes is followed by hole injection from the excited dye to valence band of the semiconductor. The dye is then regenerated by electron transfer from the reduced dye to the oxidized species ( I 3 − ) in the electrolyte. If the reduced dye cannot react with the electrolyte within the charge-separated lifetime, it may recombine with the hole in the semiconductor geminate recombination. The holes in the semiconductor move to the back collector of the working electrode and the reduced species (I<sup>−</sup>) in the electrolyte diffuses to the Pt electrode. This charge collection gives rise to a cathodic photocurrent in the external circuit. On the basis of the former studies, the following mechanism can be proposed: Upon excitation of the dye, charge separation occurs.</p><table-wrap-group id="6"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S1</label><caption><title> Normalized rate constants rate constants k<sub>eff</sub> = kD/r<sub>T</sub> obtained for the reduction of photo excite</title></caption><table-wrap id="6_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >J<sub>hv</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >k<sub>eff</sub>/10<sup>−3</sup> cm&#183;s<sup>−1</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jhv/10<sup>−9</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8 μm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 μm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 μm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44 μm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54 μm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 μm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.87</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="6_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6.21</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >7.19</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6.39</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6.22</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >8.24</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >8.92</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >k<sub>red</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.89 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.15 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.46 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.14 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Γ<sub>D</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.21 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.2 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.31 &#215; 10<sup>−7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.872 &#215; 10<sup>−7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.916 &#215; 10<sup>−7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.264 &#215; 10<sup>−7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.612 &#215; 10<sup>−7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.566 &#215; 10<sup>−7</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>A hole is injected into the NiO valence band, and the dye is reduced. The reduced dye will react with the oxidized species ( I 3 − ) of the electrolyte and regenerate to its ground state. In this case, I 2 &#183; − would be generated, which is also a common intermediate in NiO based solar cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114761-ref6">6</xref>] (TableS1 &amp; FigureS1).</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.114761-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O’Regan, B. and Gratzel, M. (1991) A Low-Cost, High-Efficiency Solar Cell Based on Dye-Sensitized Colloidal TiO2 Films. Nature, 353, 737-740. https://doi.org/10.1038/353737a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gratzel, M. (2005) Solar Energy Conversion by Dye-Sensitized Photovoltaic Cells. Inorganic Chemistry, 44, 6841-6851. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic0508371</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gratzel, M. (2001) Photoelectrochemical Cells. Nature, 414, 338-344. https://doi.org/10.1038/35104607</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Q. and Cao, G. (2011) Nanostructured Photoelectrodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar cells. Nanotoday, 6, 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2010.12.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Q., Dandeneau, C.S., Zhou, X. and Cao, G. (2009) ZnO Nanostructures for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Advanced Materials, 21, 4087-4108. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200803827</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yella, A., Lee, H.-W., Tsao, H.N., Yi, C., Chandiran, A.K., Nazeeruddin, M.K., Diau, E.W.-G., Yeh, C.-Y., Zakeeruddin S.M. and Gratzel, M. (2011) Porphyrin-Sensitized Solar Cells with Cobalt (II/III)–Based Redox Electrolyte Exceed 12 Percent Efficiency. Science, 334, 629-634. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22053043/ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1209688</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haque, S.A., Palomares, E., Cho, B.M., Green, A.N.M., Hirata, N., Klug, D.R. and Durant, J.R. (2005) Charge Separation versus Recombination in Dye-Sensitized Nanocrystalline Solar Cells: The Minimization of Kinetic Redundancy. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127, 3456-3462. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0460357</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gibson, E.A., Plux, L.L., Fortage, J., Pellegrin, Y., Blart, E., Odoble, F., Hagfeldt, A. and Boschloo, G. (2012) Role of the Triiodide/Iodide Redox Couple in Dye Regeneration in p-Type Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Lagmuir, 28, 6485-6493. https://doi.org/10.1021/la300215q</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Z.Y., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Guo, J.N., Li, H. and Yan, Y. (2017) Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Based on Cobalt Containing Room Temperature Ionic, Liquid Redox Shuttles. RSC Advances, 7, 13689-13695. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA26402F</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Odobel, F., Pleux, L., Pellegrin, Y. and Blart, L (2010) New Photovoltaic Devices Based on the Sensitization of p-Type Semiconductors: Challenges and Opportunities. Accouncts of Chemical Research, 43, 1063-1071. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar900275b</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nattestad, A., Ferguson, M., Kerr, R., Cheng, Y.B. and Bach, U. (2008) Dye-Sensitized Nickel(II) Oxide Photocathodes for Tandem Solar Cell Applications. Nanotechnology, 19, Article No. 295304. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/19/29/295304</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernando, C.A.N., Kitagawa, A., Suzuki, M., Takahashi, K. and Komura, T. (1994) Photoelectrochemical Properties of Rhodamine-C18 Sensitized p-CuSCN Photoelectrochemical Cell (PEC). Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 33, 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0248(94)90233-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, M.Z, Natu, G., Ji, Z.Q. and Wu, Y.Y. (2012) p-Type Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Based on Delafossite CuGaO2 Nanoplates with Saturation Photovoltages Exceeding 460 mV. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 3, 1074-1078. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz3003603</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Euser, T.G., Harding, P.J. and Vos, W.L. (2009) Broadband Sensitive Pump-Probe Setup for Ultrafast Optical Switching of Photonic Nanostructures and Semiconductors. Review of Scientific Instruments, 80, 073104. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3156049</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nechay, B.A., Siegner, U., Achermann, M., Bielefeldt, H. and Keller, U. (1999) Femtosecond Pump-Probe Near-Field Optical Microscopy. Review of Scientific Instruments, 70, Article No. 2758. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1149841</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azima, A., Düsterer, S., Radcliffe, P., Redlin, H., Stojanovic, N., Li, W., Schlarb, H., Feldhaus, J., Cubaynes, D., Meyer, M., Hayden, P., Hough, P., et al. (2009) Time-Resolved Pump-Probe Experiments beyond the Jitter Limitations at FLASH. Applied Physics Letters, 94, Article ID: 144102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3111789</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xiong, D.H., Xu, Z., Zeng, X.W., Zhang, W.J., Chen, W., Xu, X.B., Wang, M.K. and Cheng, Y.B. (2012) Hydrothermal Synthesis of Ultrasmall CuCrO2 Nanocrystal Alternatives to NiO Nanoparticles in Efficient p-Type Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 22, 24760-24768. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm35101c</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cui, J., Li, P.F., Chen, Z.F., et al. (2016) Phosphor Coated NiO-Based Planar Inverted Organometallic Halide Perovskite Solar Cells with Enhanced Efficiency and Stability. Applied Physics Letters, 109, Article ID: 171103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4965838</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Keis, K., Magnusson, E., Lindstrom, H., Lindquist, S.-E. and Hagfeldt, A. (2002) A 5% Efficient Photo Electrochemical Solar Cell Based on Nanostructured ZnO Electrodes. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 73, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(01)00110-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ito, S., Zakeeruddin, S.M., Humphry-Baker, R., Liska, P., Charvet, R., Comte, P., Nazeerudd in, M.K., Pechy, P., Taketa, M., Miura, H., Uchida, S. and Gratzel, M. (2006) High-Efficiency Organic-Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Controlled by Nanocrystalline-TiO2 Electrode Thickness. Advanced Materials, 18, 1202-1205. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200502540</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martini, L.A., Moore, G.F., Milot, R.L., et al. (2013) Modular Assembly of High-Potential Zinc Porphyrin Photosensitizers Attached to TiO2 with a Series of Anchoring Groups. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 117, 14526-14533. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4053456</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turner, G.M., Beard, M.C. and Schmuttenmaer, C.A. (2002) Carrier Localization and Cooling in Dye-Sensitized Nanocrystalline Titanium Dioxide. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 106, 11716-11719. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp025844e</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heimer, T.A., Heilweil E.J., et al. (2000) Electron Injection, Recombination, and Halide Oxidation Dynamics at Dye-Sensitized Metal Oxide Interfaces. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 104, 4256-4262. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp993438y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kuciauskas, D., Monat, J.E., Villahermosa, R., Gray, H.B., Lewis, N.S. and McCusker, J.K. (2002) Transient Absorption Spectroscopy of Ruthenium and Osmium Polypyridyl Complexes Adsorbed onto Nanocrystalline TiO2 Photoelectrodes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 106, 9347-9358. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp014589f</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, C. and Wittstock, G. (2004) Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy of Quinoprotein Glucose Dehyd Rogenase. Analytical Chemistry, 76, 3145-3154. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac035492n</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tefashe, U.M., Nonomura, K., Vlachopoulos, N., Hagfeldt, A. and Wittstock, G. (2012) Effect of Cation on Dye Regeneration Kinetics of N719-Sensitized TiO2 Films in Acetonitrile-Based and Ionic-Liquid-Based Electrolytes Investigated by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 116, 4316-4323. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp207671w</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tefashe, U.M., Rudolph, M., Miura, H. and Wittstock, D.S. (2010) Photovoltaic chara Cteristics and Dye Regeneration Kinetics in D149-Sensitized ZnO with Varied Dye Loading and Film Thickness. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 7533-7542. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cp40798a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shen, Y., Nonomura, K., Schlettwein, D., Zhao, C. and Wittstock, G. (2006) Photoelectrochemical kinetics of Eosin Y-sensitized zinc oxide films investigated by scanning electrochemical Microscopy. Chemistry: A European Journal, 12, 5832-5839. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200501241</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shen, Y., Tinashe, U.M., Nonomurab, K., Loewenstein, T., Schlettwein, D. and Witt stock, G. (2009) Photoelectrochemical Kinetics of Eosin Y-Sensitized Zinc Oxide Films Investigated by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy under Illumination with Different LED. Electrochimica Acta, 55, 458-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.08.062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, X.L., Huang, F.Z., Nattestad, A., et al. (2011) Enhanced Open-Circuit Voltage of p-Type DSC with Highly Crystalline NiO Nanoparticles. Chemical Communications, 47, 4808-4810. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cc05445c</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alemu, A.G. and Alemu, T. (2021) Dye Regeneration Kinetics of Sensitized Nickel Oxide Films under Illumination Investigated by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry, 11, 78-92. https://doi.org/10.4236/ampc.2021.114008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, X., Leddy, J. and Bard, A.J. (1985) Dependence of Rate Constants of Heterogeneous Electron Transfer Reactions on Viscosity. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 107, 3719-3721. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00298a054</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cornut, R. and Lefrou, C. (2008) New Analytical Approximation of Feedback Approach Curves with a Micro Disk SECM Tip and Irreversible Kinetic Reaction at the Substrate. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 621, 178-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2007.09.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mirabel, A. and Barton, S.C. (2021) Numerical Correction of in Situ AFM-SECM Measurements. Analytical Chemistry, 93, 12495-12503. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00770</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wittstock, G., Burchardt, M., Pust, S.E., Shen, Y. and Zhao, C. (2007) Scanning Electrochemical Microcopy for Direct Imaging of Reaction Rates. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 46, 1584-1617. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200602750</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liljeroth, P., Vanmaekelbergh, D., Ruiz, V., Kontturi, K., Jiang, H., Kauppinen, E. and Quinn, B.M. (2004) Electron Transport in Two-Dimensional Arrays of Gold Nanocrystals Investigated by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 126, 7126-7132. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0493188</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, B., Bard, A.J., Mirkin, M.V. and Creager, S.E. (2004) Electron Transfer at Self-Assembled Mono Layers Measured by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 126, 1485-1492. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja038611p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bozic, B. and Figgemeier, E. (2006) Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy under Illumination: An Elegant Tool to Directly Determine the Mobility of Charge Carriers within Dye-Sensitized Nanostructured Semiconductors. Chemical Communications, 2268-2270. https://doi.org/10.1039/b601587e</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Figgemeier, E., Kylberg, W.H. and Bozic, B. (2006) Scanning Photo-Electrochemical Microscopy as a Versatile Tool to Investigate Dye-Sensitized Nano-Crystalline Surfaces for Solar cells. SPIE: The International Society for Optical, 6197, 619711. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.662726</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haram, S.K. and Bard, A.J. (2001) Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. 42. Studies of the Kinetic and Photoelectrochemistry of Thin Film CdS/Electrolyte Interfaces. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 105, 8192-8195. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp011068j</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tefashe, U.M., Loewenstein, T., Miura, H., Schlettwein, D. and Wittstock, G. (2010) Scanning Electrochemical Microscope Studies of Dye Regeneration in Indoline (D149)-Sensitized ZnO Photoelectrochemical Cells. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 650, 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.09.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morandeira, A., Boschloo, G., Hagfeldt, A. and Hammarstro, L. (2008) Coumarin 343-NiO Films as Nanostructured Photocathodes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Ultrafast Electron Transfer, Effect of the I3-/I- Redox Couple and Mechanism of Photocurrent Generation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 112, 9530-9537. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp800760q</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morandeira, A., Boschloo, G., Hagfeldt, A. and Hammarstrom, L. (2005) Photoinduced Ultrafast Dynamics of Coumarin 343 Sensitized p-Type-Nanostructured NiO Films. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 109, 19403-19410. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp053230e</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Borgstrom, M., Blart, E., Boschloo, G., Mukhtar, E., Hagfeldt, A., Hammarstrom, L. and Odobel, F. (2005) Sensitized Hole Injection of Phosphorus Porphyrin into NiO: Toward New Photovoltaic Devices. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 109, 22928-22934. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp054034a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peng, Q., Joanna, W., Elizabeth, A., Gibson, E.A., Linder, M., Li, L., Brinck, L., Hagfeldt, A., Albinsson, B. and Sun, L.C. (2010) Synthesis and Mechanistic Studies of Organic Chromophores with Different Energy Levels for p-Type Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 114, 4738-4748. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp911091n</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alemu, G., Zhang, B., Li, J., Xu, X., Cui, J., Shen, Y. and M. Wang (2014) Investigation of Dye Regeneration Kinetics at dye-Sensitized p-Type Cucro2 Film/Electrolytes Interface with Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. NANO: Reports and Reviews, 9, 1440008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793292014400086</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alemu, G., Cui, J., Cao, K., Li, J., Shen, Y. and Wang, M. (2014) Investigation of the Regeneration Kinetics of Organic Dyes with Pyridine Ring Anchoring Groups by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. RSC Advances, 4, 51374-51380. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA07908F</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alemu, G., Li, J.P., Cui, J., Xu, X.B., et al. (2015) Investigation on Regeneration Kinetics at Perovskite/Oxide Interface with Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 3, 9216-9222. https://www.researchgate.net/  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA06126H</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114761-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morandeira, A., Fortage, J., Edvinsson, T., Le Pleux, L., Blart, E., Boschloo, G., Hagfeldt, A., Hammarstrom, L. and Odobel, F. (2008) Improved Photon-to-Current Conversion Efficiency with a Nanoporous p-Type NiO Electrode by the Use of a Sensitizer-Acceptor dyad. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 112, 1721-1728. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp077446n</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>