<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2021.1112173</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-114349</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Gynecological and Obstetrical Emergencies at the University Clinic of Gynecology-Obstetrics of the National Hospital Donka Guinea
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mamadou</surname><given-names>Hady Diallo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fatoumata</surname><given-names>Bamba Diallo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Massa</surname><given-names>Keita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Djénabou</surname><given-names>Binta Baldé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alpha</surname><given-names>Boubacar Barry</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ibrahima</surname><given-names>Sory Baldé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Telly</surname><given-names>Sy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Namory</surname><given-names>Keita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>University Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, National Hospital Ignace Deen, Conakry, Guinea</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>University Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics, National Hospital Donka, Conakry, Guinea</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1862</fpage><lpage>1874</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Gynecological and obstetrical emergencies are found all over the world, especially in developing countries where women pay a heavy price for giving birth. They can occur at any time during pregnancy and outside of pregnancy often in a socio-economic context. The objectives of this study were to describe the sociodemographic characteristics and the maternal and fetal prognosis
   of gynecological and obstetric emergencies. <b>Patients an</b>
  <b>d Methods: </b>
  This was a descriptive cross-sectional study with prospective data collection, conducted at the University Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the Donka National Hospital between June 1 and September 30, 2015. It involved all patients admitted to our department in emergency for a gynecological or obstetrical complaint. 
  <b>Results:</b>
   We collected 361 cases of gynecological and obstetrical emergencies out of a total of 1779 consultations, 
  i.e
  . a frequency of 20.29%. Obstetrical emergencies were predominant with 91.41% and gynecological emergencies represented 8.59%. The average age of patients was 29.5 with extremes of 14 and 47. Nulliparous women were the most numerous (34.35%). More than half of the patients did not attend school (52.08%) and 56.70% were evacuees. Abdominopelvic pain and hemorrhage were the main reasons for consultation (54.29% and 49.58%). Admission diagnoses were dominated by acute fetal distress and hemorrhage in the last quarter of pregnancy (52.3% and 36.01%). The caesarean section rate was high (82.12%). Maternal and perinatal lethality rates were high (5.2% and 30.3%). 
  <b>Conclusion:</b>
   Gynecological and obstetrical emergencies are a public health issue because of the severity of the prognosis they impose on the mother and child. Maternal and perinatal mortality was very high. The prevention of these serious emergencies must be done through good quality prenatal consultations. Laparoscopy equipment and staff training are necessary for a minimal invasive surgery of gynecological emergencies.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Gynecological Emergencies</kwd><kwd> Obstetrical</kwd><kwd> Donka</kwd><kwd> Guinea</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Gynecological and obstetrical emergencies are dramatic clinical situations involving the short-term vital prognosis of the mother and/or the foetus. They can occur at any time during pregnancy and often in an unfavorable socioeconomic context [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>Pregnant women are at risk for obstetrical complications that are often unpredictable and often fatal. Cataclysmic rupture of an ectopic pregnancy is not uncommon in our setting. Prenatal screening for high-risk pregnancies does not identify all women who will experience the emergency, and women who are not identified as being in the high-risk groups may nevertheless present obstetrical complications during labor, and these have a guarded maternal and fetal prognosis. If the pregnancy is well managed, it leads to a live birth and constitutes for women a criterion of social valorization. However, for millions of women, the outcome of pregnancy can be fatal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>The WHO estimates that every year in the world at least half a million women die as a result of obstetric complications and 3% of the approximately 120 million children born each year have fetal distress and about 90,000 of them die from this respiratory distress [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>Sub-Saharan Africa is the region of the world with the highest maternal mortality rate. Of 536,000 maternal deaths recorded, more than a half (270,000) occurred in Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>Several emergencies can therefore be encountered during pregnancy, delivery and postpartum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>Maternal mortality and stillbirth are the dramatic outcomes of these complications.</p><p>The objectives of this study were to describe the sociodemographic characteristics and the maternal and fetal prognosis of these emergencies.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Method</title><p>This was a descriptive cross-sectional study with prospective data collection, conducted at the University Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Donka National Hospital of the University Hospital of Conakry between June 1 and September 30, 2015. It involved all patients admitted to our department in emergency for a gynecological or obstetrical complaint.</p><p>Gynecological and obstetrical emergencies are dramatic clinical situations involving the maternal and/or fetal vital prognosis in the short term.</p><p>We proceeded to an exhaustive recruitment of all patients admitted in emergency in gynecological or obstetrical consultation during the study period.</p><p>We included in this study all patients admitted for a gynecological or obstetrical emergency and managed in the department during the study period.</p><p>The study population consisted of all women admitted to the gynecology-obstetrics department of Donka National Hospital for an acute gynecological pathology or one that occurred during pregnancy, delivery, or within 42 days of delivery and for which a precise diagnosis and a treatment were necessary to preserve the vital maternal and/or fetal prognosis. We followed the patients from admission to discharge. Data were collected using a survey form. The variables studied were sociodemographic, clinical, therapeutic and prognostic characteristics. The data were entered and processed using the epi info version 7 software.</p><p>Results were presented in tabular forms, expressed as percentages and averages.</p><p>The study protocol was approved by hospital authorities and informed consent was obtained from participants.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Overall Frequency</title><p>During the study period we collected 361 cases of gynecological and obstetrical emergencies out of a total of 1779 consultations, i.e. a frequency of 20.29%.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Specificity of the Emergencies</title><p>Obstetrical emergencies largely dominated with 91.41% and gynecological emergencies represented 8.59% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>The average age of patients was 29.5 with extremes of 14 and 47. The average parity was 1.9 with extremes of 0 and 11 years. Housewives and the uneducated were the most numerous. Most of our patients were married.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Mode of Admission</title><p>More than half of the patients were evacuated (56.70%) compared to 43.3% who came on their own.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Means of Transport</title><p>The transfer was not medicalized in any of the 100% cases and was done by public transport or in a private car. No venous lines were taken.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Prenatal Follow-Up</title><p>More than half of the patients (53%) received between 1 and 3 ANCs, 24.4% more than 4 ANCs and 22.3% no ANC (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>In more than half of cases abdominopelvic pain was the reason for admission.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. General Condition at Admission</title><p>The general condition was considered satisfactory in 84% of cases and poor in</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Socio-demographic characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Socio-demographic characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pourcentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 - 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average age: 29.5 Average age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Extremes: 14 et 47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nulliparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pauciparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Large multiparous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Socio-professional category</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Housewives</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.44%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liberal profession</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary school and university students</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Civil servants</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Educational Level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non educated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary school level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary school level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Higher education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marrital Status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >337</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.65</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>16% of cases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>Obstetrical emergencies were dominated by an acute fetal distress and hemorrhage in the last quarter of the pregnancy.</p><p>Gynecological emergencies represented 8.59% and were dominated by hemorrhagic abortions, followed by a cataclysmic rupture of the ectopic pregnancy, the hemorrhagic fibromyoma and the ovarian cyst torsion.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients by reason for admission</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reasons for admission</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 361</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominopelvic pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >196</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemorrhage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dizziness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Headache</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epigastric pain in bar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pelvic pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Loss of fluid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tonicoclonic seizures</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nausea and vomiting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Diagnosis on admission of patients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diagnosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number (N = 361)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obstetrical Emmergencies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SFA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HRP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Placenta pr&#230;via</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Placenta previa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Delivery hemorrhage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pelvic anomalies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eclampsia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Severe pre-eclampsia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RPM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pulsatile cord prolapse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-rupture syndrome</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DFP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >J2 retention</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gynacological Emmergencies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ruptured EPs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemorrhagic fibromyoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovarian cyst torsion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.39</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Caesarean Section Rate</title><p>We recorded 271 cases of caesarean sections out of 330 obstetrical emergencies, i.e. a rate of 82.12%.</p></sec><sec id="s3_8"><title>3.8. Therapeutic Data</title><p>In our series, 12% of patients were transfused for severe anemia. All patients received crystalloids (lactated Ringer’s or isotonic saline), colloids (macromolecules) in 62.2% of cases. The antibiotic therapy was systematic in all patients, in most cases 1 g injectable ampicillin was associated with 500 mg infusable metronidazole. Hypertensive attacks were treated with alpha methyldopa and injectable nicardipine. Magnesium sulfate was used to treat or prevent seizures in 43.6% of cases.</p><p>In addition to the caesarean section (82.12%), an exploratory laparotomy was performed either for uterine rupture in 3.6% of cases, ectopic pregnancies in 2.49%, hemorrhagic fibromyoma in 1.94%, cyst torsion in 1.39%. Eight hysterectomies for hemostasis were performed, i.e. 2.21% for the worsening of hemorrhage. Laparoscopy was not performed due to the lack of equipment.</p><p>Regarding the management of abortions, manual intrauterine aspirations were performed in 2.77% of patients. A uterine revision was necessary in 17.3% of cases.</p><p>The average length of hospitalization was 3.2 days with extremes of 1 and 17 days.</p></sec><sec id="s3_9"><title>3.9. Maternal Lethality Rate</title><p>We recorded 19 cases of maternal death, i.e. a maternal lethality of 5.26%. Causes of death were dominated by hemorrhage, 16 cases out of 19, i.e. 84.21%. Other causes were represented by complications of vasculorenal syndromes, 3 cases out of 19, i.e. 15.79%. All cases of death were related to obstetrical emergencies.</p></sec><sec id="s3_10"><title>3.10. Perinatal Lethality Rate</title><p>The perinatal mortality was 30.3%.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Frequency</title><p>Gynaecological and obstetrical emergencies were frequent in our study. These emergencies were essentially obstetrical (91.41%) with an acute fetal distress as the main entity in our setting, followed by last pregnancy quarter hemorrhage. This high frequency of gynecological and obstetrical emergencies in our series could be explained by the fact that the university clinic of gynecology and obstetrics of the Donka National Hospital is the largest hospital in the country intended to receive all the severe cases evacuated. by peripheral health structures and birthing centers in Conakry.</p><p>Our frequency is much higher than those observed in Togo (2.65%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref7">7</xref>] and in Gabon (3.15%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>It is also higher than those observed in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref12">12</xref>]. The high proportion of obstetrical emergencies was due not only to the geographical location of Donka maternity hospital in relation to the 4 urban communes of Conakry, but also to the high number of complicated deliveries evacuated to the maternity hospital of Donka. Gynaecological emergencies represented 8.59% and were dominated by haemorrhagic abortions, followed by the cataclysmic rupture of ectopic pregnancy, haemorrhagic fibromyoma and ovarian cyst torsion. These complications were mainly related to the late discovery of these various pathologies. All cases of ectopic pregnancy were received in a cataclysmic rupture picture with peritoneal flooding.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Sociodemographic Characteristics</title><p>The average age of patients was 29.5 with extremes of 14 and 47. Tchaou B A et al reported an average age of 26.7 &#177; 6.2 with extremes of 15 and 45 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>For Kadima M C et al. the 20 - 35 age group was the target of obstetrical emergencies with 77.63% of cases, the average age was 29.19 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>For Samak&#233; et al. the average age was 26 with extremes of 15 and 44 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>Andriamudy C L et al. reported extremes of 15 and 48 with an average age of 29 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>S&#233;pou A et al. found an average age of 24 with extremes of 13 and 60. In the latter study, gynecological pathologies were included [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>The average gestational age was 2.9 with extremes of 0 and 12.</p><p>For Samak&#233; A et al., primiparous women represented 60.4% of the sample and multiparous women 39.51% for an average parity of 4 with extremes of 1 and 14 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>Tchaou B A et al. reported an average gestity of 3.2 &#177; 12.16 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>At the University Hospital of Brazzaville, admissions to gynecological and obstetrical emergencies were more represented by primiparous women (42%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref16">16</xref>]. In their series, primiparity was associated with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia in most of the cases admitted.</p><p>In Benin, multiparous women (34.59%) and primiparous women (27.83%) were in the majority.</p><p>The high percentage of nulliparous and primiparous women among obstetric emergencies also confirms the notion of risk of gravidopuerperium in young women. It is in this group that a high frequency of vasculorenal syndromes and mechanical dystocia is observed. Thus, gravidopuerperium in this category of pregnant women is marked with obstetrical problems due to the immaturity and the inexperience of primiparous women on the one hand, and the fragility of the uterus of multiparous women on the other [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref18">18</xref>].</p><p>More than half of the patients were not educated (52.08%). A high level of education would help to understand the usefulness of prenatal consultations in the detection and the prevention of complications. Early detection of EPs allows therapeutic actions to be taken to avoid cataclysmic rupture.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Prenatal Consultations</title><p>In 53% of cases, patients admitted for obstetrical emergencies received between 1 and 3 ANCs. Most pregnancies with obstetrical emergencies were poorly followed up. Prenatal consultations were not of good quality.</p><p>This observation was also made in Gabon in Libreville where the average ANC was 2 &#177; 1.8 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>We note that most of these parturient with obstetrical emergencies did not receive any ANCs and showed up only during labor. Although prenatal monitoring is an effective preventive activity that improves the outcome of the pregnancy, the number of ANCs is not sufficient and quality must be added to improve the effectiveness of prenatal monitoring [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>Clinically, abdominopelvic pain of the UC type and hemorrhage were the main reasons for consultation.</p><p>The diagnoses of severity on admission were mainly acute fetal distress and hemorrhage in the last quarter of the pregnancy.</p><p>For Tchaou B A et al., signs of clinical severity on admission were: hypertensive crisis (21.1%), hyperthermia (12.3%), anemia (11.2%), shock (5.4%), coma (3.8%), seizures (1.4%) and jaundice (1%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref2">2</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Therapeutic Data</title><p>In terms of treatment, our patients received either a medical, an obstetrical or a surgical treatments or both or all three of them at the same time.</p><p>In the Tchaou B 17 series, 5% of patients received transfusions for severe anemia and 60.2% of patients received vascular filling. Hypertensive crises were treated with Nicardipine in 12.2% of cases. Magnesium sulfate was used to treat or prevent seizures in 9.3% of cases. Three hundred and thirty-seven deliveries were performed, 53.4% by vaginal delivery and 46.6% by cesarean section. One case of caesarean section was followed by a hysterectomy for delivery hemorrhage due to uterine atony. In addition to cesarean sections, 12.9% of patients underwent laparotomy either for an extra uterine pregnancy (12.4%) or for pelviperitonitis (0.05%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref2">2</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Maternal Mortality</title><p>Maternal case fatality in our series was 5.2%. Our rate was higher than the 2.63% reported by Kadima M C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>Our rate, although high, is lower than those found in other African countries: 13.08% in Mali [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref6">6</xref>], 13.11% in Togo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref7">7</xref>], 5.79% at the University Hospital of Bouak&#233; in C&#244;te d'Ivoire with uterine rupture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>The main causes of these deaths were related to hemorrhage. The poor general condition of patients, aggravated by the conditions of transfer, could be the explanation for the high rate of maternal mortality in our environment.</p></sec><sec id="s4_6"><title>4.6. Perinatal Mortality</title><p>The perinatal prognosis was severe in our study (30.3%). Indeed, this rate remains high compared to those of the authors: 15.44% at the CNHHU of Cotonou [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref12">12</xref>], 11.6% at the CHU of Cocody of Abidjan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>It should be noted that higher rates are reported in the literature, particularly in the series of the maternity hospital of the Malagasy District where it was 51.57% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref1">1</xref>] and in that of the regional hospital of Sokod&#233; in Togo, 52.45% with a very high prevalence of uterine rupture (83.33) and HRP (80%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref7">7</xref>]. In Bouak&#233;, the perinatal prognosis was catastrophic with 92.6% of fetal death during uterine rupture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114349-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>Our high rates of maternal and perinatal deaths could be explained not only by the poor health coverage of the country in quality emergency obstetric and neonatal care but also by the three delays leading to death.</p><p>We also note a poor organization of the referral.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Limitations and Difficulties</title><p>The closure of Donka National Hospital of the University Hospital of Conakry was our main difficulty.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>Gynaecological and obstetrical emergencies are a real public health issue in our environment because of the severity of the prognosis they impose on mothers and children. The maternal and perinatal mortality was very high in our environment. The prevention of these serious emergencies must be done through good quality prenatal consultations, rigorous monitoring of labor (partogram) and timely evacuation to referral centers equipped with the required number and quality of equipment and staff, which is cruelly lacking in many medical facilities in developing countries. All efforts should be focused on increasing the capacity of health care providers to provide a quality pregnancy monitoring, early diagnosis of emergencies and referral of patients to appropriate centers in a timely manner for a rational management. Laparoscopic equipment and staff training are necessary for a minimal invasive surgery in gynecological emergencies.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Diallo, M.H., Diallo, F.B., Keita, M., Bald&#233;, D.B., Barry, A.B., Bald&#233;, I.S., Sy, T. and Keita, N. (2021) Gynecological and Obstetrical Emergencies at the University Clinic of Gynecology-Obstetrics of the National Hospital Donka Guinea. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11, 1862-1874. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2021.1112173</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Fiche D’Enquete</title><p>I-Interrogatoire:</p><p>Date d’entr&#233;e: ………; Date de sortie: ……………</p><p>1-Age …………ans</p><p>2-R&#233;sidence: a-Kaloum □ b-Dixinn □ c-Matam □ d-Ratoma □</p><p>e-Matoto □ f- Si autre (&#224; pr&#233;ciser)……………………….</p><p>3-Niveau d’instruction: a-N&#233;ant □ b-Primaire □ c-Secondaire □ d-Sup&#233;rieur □</p><p>4- Profession: a-M&#233;nag&#232;re □ b-El&#232;ve/&#233;tudiante □ c-Fonctionnaire □</p><p>d-m&#233;nag&#232;re □ f-Autres (&#224; pr&#233;ciser)………………………..</p><p>5-Statut matrimonial: a-Mari&#233;e □ b-c&#233;libataire □ c-Divorc&#233;e □ Veuve □</p><p>6-Mode d’admission: a-Evacu&#233;e □ b-Venue d’elle-m&#234;me □ c-R&#233;f&#233;rence □</p><p>Si &#233;vacu&#233;e; motif: 1-Dystocie □ 2-H&#233;morragie □ 3-Eclampsie □ 4-SFA □</p><p>5-H&#233;morragie de la d&#233;livrance □ 6-Douleur pelvienne □ 7-GEU □</p><p>8-An&#233;mie sur grossesse □ 9-Autres…………………</p><p>Si venue d’elle-m&#234;me ; motif: 1-H&#233;morragie □ 2-Douleur pelvienne □</p><p>3-Crise convulsive □ 4-Autres……………………</p><p>7-Support de r&#233;f&#233;rence: a-Partogramme □ b-Fiche d’&#233;vacuation □ c-Lettre □</p><p>d-Sans documents □</p><p>II-Rubrique Ant&#233;c&#233;dents:</p><p>A-Ant&#233;c&#233;dent m&#233;dicaux: 1-HTA □ 2-An&#233;mie □ 3-Bilharziose □ 4-Diab&#232;te □</p><p>5-Tuberculose □ 6-Autres………………………….</p><p>B-Ant&#233;c&#233;dents chirurgicaux: 1-Appendicectomie □ 2-P&#233;ritonite □ 3-C&#233;sarienne □</p><p>4-Myomectomie□ 5-Curetage □ 6-Autres……………….</p><p>C-Ant&#233;c&#233;dent gyn&#233;co-obst&#233;tricaux: 1-Fibrome ut&#233;rin □ 2-Salpingectomie □</p><p>3-kystectomie □ 4-Infection g&#233;n&#233;rale □ 5-Avortement □ 6-Plastie tubaire □</p><p>7-Malformation g&#233;nitale □ 8-Autres……………….</p><p>D-Gestit&#233;:…………………..</p><p>E-Parit&#233;:……………….</p><p>F-Nombre d’enfant vivant:………………enfant(s)</p><p>G-Nature de la grossesse actuelle: 1-Pathologique □ 2-Non pathologique □</p><p>H-Age gestationnel:………SA</p><p>I-Nombre de CPN:……………….</p><p>III Plaintes &#224; l’admission: Pelvialgie: a-Mod&#233;r&#233;e □ b-Intense □ c-Tr&#232;s intense □</p><p>III-a-Examen clinique:</p><p>A-Signes g&#233;n&#233;raux: 1-Etat g&#233;n&#233;ral: a-Bon □ b-Passable □ c-Alt&#233;r&#233;</p><p>2-Coloration des conjonctives: a-Color&#233;s □ b-Hypocolor&#233;s □ c-P&#226;les □</p><p>3-Temp&#233;rature:…………˚C</p><p>4-Tension art&#233;rielle:………….cmHg</p><p>5-Pouls:……………puls/mn</p><p>B-Examen obst&#233;trical:</p><p>a-HU:………cm; b-CA:………..cm; c-PP:…….g; d-BCF:………bat/mn</p><p>1-Examen au sp&#233;culum: Col sain: a- Oui □ b- Non □</p><p>2-Toucher Vaginal: a-Dilatation incompl&#232;te □ b-Dilatation compl&#232;te □ c-Col ferme □</p><p>2-1-M&#233;trorragie: a-Minime □ b-Moyenne □ c-Abondante □ d-Tr&#232;s abondante □</p><p>e-Pas de m&#233;trorragie □</p><p>B-Signes cardio-vasculaires: 1-Tachycardie: a-Oui □ b-Non □</p><p>2-Etat de choc: a- Oui □ b- Non □</p><p>C-signes neurologiques 1-Agitation: a-Oui □ b-Non □</p><p>2-Obnubilation: a-Oui □ b-Non □</p><p>3-Coma: a-Oui □ b-Non □</p><p>D-Etat de la femme en travail:</p><p>1-Dur&#233;e du travail: ………heure</p><p>IV Examens compl&#233;mentaires:</p><p>1-Tx d’H&#233;moglobine en urgence: ………….g/dl</p><p>2-Groupage- rh&#233;sus en urgence: a-Oui □ b- Non □</p><p>3-Echographie: pr&#233;ciser r&#233;sultat (anomalie):…………………………………………..</p><p>V- Diagnostic: a-SFA □ b-Rupture ut&#233;rine □ c-PPH □ d-HRP □ e-Dystocie □</p><p>f-H&#233;morragie de la d&#233;livrance □ g-L&#233;sion des parties molles □ h-DFP □ i-Eclampsie □</p><p>j-Pr&#233;sentation dystocique □ k-Procidence du cordon □ l- GEU □</p><p>m-Torsion de kyste □ n-Avortement □ o-Autres &#224; pr&#233;ciser……………………………………….</p><p>VI Modes th&#233;rapeutiques</p><p>A-H&#233;morragie de la d&#233;livrance:</p><p>1-R&#233;vision ut&#233;rine □ 2-Examens sous valve □ 3-Transfusion sanguine □</p><p>4-Perfusion de macromol&#233;cules □ 5- Administration d’ut&#233;rotoniques □</p><p>B-L&#233;sion des parties molles: 1-Suture sous anesth&#233;sie □ 2-Perfusion de solut&#233; □</p><p>3-Transfusion sanguine □ 4: Suture sans anesth&#233;sie □</p><p>C-Eclampsie: 1-Administration d’anticonvulsivant □ 2-Administration d’anti-hypertenseur □</p><p>3-C&#233;sarienne □ 4-R&#233;animation □</p><p>D- PPH: 1-Amniotomie □ 2-Perfusion d’ocytocine □ 3-C&#233;sarienne □</p><p>E-HRP: 1-Amniotomie □ 2-Perfusion d’ocytocine □ 3-C&#233;sarienne □</p><p>4-Accouchement par voie basse □</p><p>F- SFA: 1-Forceps □ 2-C&#233;sarienne □</p><p>G-GEU: 1-Laparotomie □ 2-Perfusion de solut&#233; □ 3-Transfusion sanguine □</p><p>H- Torsion de kyste: 1-Antalgique (pr&#233;ciser).......................................................</p><p>2-Laparotomie □ 3- Perfusion de solut&#233; □</p><p>I-Avortement: 1-Expulsion spontan&#233;e □ 2-Curage/curetage □ 3 Administration d’ocytocique □</p><p>VII- Evolution et pronostic:</p><p>A-Pour l’enfant: 1-Vivant □ 2-Mort-n&#233; □ 3-D&#233;c&#232;s n&#233;onatal □</p><p>Si vivant, APGAR &#224; la naissance: ………………………………………</p><p>1-R&#233;anim&#233;: a- Suites bonnes □ b -D&#233;c&#232;s n&#233;onatal □</p><p>Si mort-n&#233; cause: a- SFA □ b -RU □ c-PPH □ d-HRP □ e-Eclampsie □ f- Procidence □</p><p>g-Pr&#233;sentation dystocique □</p><p>B-Pour la m&#232;re vivante: a-Suites simples □ b-suites compliqu&#233;es □</p><p>1-Nature des suites de couche: a- Endom&#233;trite □ b-An&#233;mie □ c-Septic&#233;mie □</p><p>d-Thrombophl&#233;bite □ e- Suppuration + l&#226;chage □ f- P&#233;ritonite □ g-Pelvip&#233;ritonite □</p><p>2-M&#232;re d&#233;c&#233;d&#233;e, cause: a-H&#233;morragie □ b-An&#233;mie □ c-Arr&#234;t cardiaque □</p><p>d-HTA et complication □ e-Septic&#233;mie □</p><p>-Voie d’accouchement des m&#232;res d&#233;c&#233;d&#233;es:</p><p>1-Voie basse □ 2-Voie haute □ 3-Avant accouchement □</p><p>-Dur&#233;e de l’hospitalisation en jour:.........................jour(s)</p><p>-Besoin de transfusion: 1-oui □ 2-non □</p><p>-Besoin satisfait: 1-oui □ 2-non □</p><p>Si oui besoins satisfait en quantit&#233; par ml de sang:………..ml</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.114349-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Solofomalala, G.D., Randriamalalaarijaona, R.T., Rasendramino, M.H., Ratsivalaka, R. and Canonne, F. (2007) Les urgences gynéco-obstétricales dans une Maternité de District Malgache. Revue tropicale de chirurgie, 1, 67-70</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tchaou, B.A., Hounkponou, N.F.M., Salifou, K., Zoumenou, E. and Chobli, M. (2015) Les urgences obstétricales à l’h&amp;ocirc;pital universitaire de Parakou au Bénin: Aspects cliniques, thérapeutiques et évolutifs. European Scientific Journal, 11, 260-272.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OMS (World Health Organization) (2009) Rapport synthése du lancement du guide des recommandations pour la pratique clinique des soins obstétricaux et néonataux d’urgence en Afrique. Bamako, Mali, du 21 juillet 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fourn, L., Lokossou, F.E.B. and Yacoubou, M. (2000) Mortalité maternelle évitable en milieu hospitalier dans un département au Benin. Médecine d’Afrique Noire, 47, 23-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mafart, B.Y. (1996) Approche de la mortalité maternelle au moyen age en Provence. Actes des 6é journées anthropologiques. Dossiers de documentation archéologique No 17, Centre National de rechercche sur la santé. édit, Paris .</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kadima</surname><given-names> M.C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mumba</surname><given-names> M.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Biayi</surname><given-names> M.J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>profil et pronostic des urgences obstétricales en salle de travail de la maternité de Bonzola à Mbujimayi</article-title><source> Mali médical</source><volume> 30</volume>,<fpage> 65</fpage>-<lpage>73</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akpadza, K., Baeta, S. and Hodonou, A.K.S. (1996) Fréquence et pronostic de quatre grandes urgences médico-obstétricales au centre hospitalier régional de Sokode. Médecine d’Afrique Noire, 43, 593-595.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mayi-Tsonga, S., Meye, J.F., Tagne, A., Ndombi, I., Diallo, T., Oksana, L., Mendome, G. and Mounanga, M. (2007) Audit de la morbidité obstétricale grave (near miss) au Gabon. Cahiers d’études et de recherches francophones/Santé, 17, 111-115.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouakou, P., Djanhan, Y., Doumba, Y., Djanhan, L. and Ouatara, M. (2007) Les ruptures utérines: Aspects épidémiologiques et pronostic f&amp;#339;to-maternel à la maternité du CHU de Bouaké, édition CAMES-série A, Vol. 5, CAMES, cote d’ivoire</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pete, Y., Ouattara, A., Koffi, N., Abhe, C., Sanou, J., Iteke, F. and Kane, M. (2012) Césariennes en urgence: Pronostic materno-f&amp;#339;tal au CHU de Cocody d’Abidjan. SARANF. RAMUR, 17, 65-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Bechir, M. and El Hafed, D.M. (2011) La prévalence de la césarienne à l’h&amp;ocirc;pital régional de Zouerate. Université de Nouakchott, Nouakchott.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tshabu-Aguemon, C., Denakpo, J., Adisso, S., Mampassi, E. and De Souza, J. (2012) Mortalités maternelles et périnatales liées aux références obstétricales à la C.U.G.O du CNHU-HKM de Cotonou. SARANF. RAMUR, 17, 1-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samaké, A., Traore, S.O., Keita, M., Doumbia, S., Diallo, M., Konaté, M., Diarra, L., Maiga, M., Traoré, O.M., Traoré, M.A., Diakité, N., et al. (2020) Les évacuations sanitaires obstétricales dans un H&amp;ocirc;pital de deuxième niveau de référence du district de Bamako. Health Sciences and Disease, 21, 96-99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andriamady Rosoarimahandry, C.L., Rakotoarimanana, M. and Ranjalahy, R.J. (2000) Mortalité maternelle à la maternité de Befelatanana. Journal de gynécologie obstétrique et Biologique de la Reproduction, 29, 501-508.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sepou</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Yanza</surname><given-names> M.C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Nguembi</surname><given-names> E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Dotte</surname><given-names> G.R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Nali</surname><given-names> M.N. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>Analyse des évacuations sanitaires en gynécologie obstétrique à Bangui, Centrafrique</article-title><source> Cahiers d’études et de recherches francophones/Santé</source><volume> 10</volume>,<fpage> 399</fpage>-<lpage>405</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otiobanda, G.F., Mahoungou-Guimbi, K.C., Itoua, C., Ellenge Mbolla, F.B. and Soussa, R.G. (2012) Morbidité et mortalité gravido-puerpérale dans un service de réanimation polyvalente. SARANF. RAMUR, 17, 1-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tebeu, P.M., Major, A.L., Ludicke, F., Obama, A.M.T., Kouam, L. and Doh, A.S. (2004) Devenir de l’accouchement aux ages extr&amp;ecirc;mes de la vie reproductive. Revue médecine Liége, 59, 455-459.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114349-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boyoma, B.M. (2011) Etude de la fréquence des urgences obstétricales à l’h&amp;ocirc;pital général de référence de Kamina. Université de Kamina RDC, Kamina.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>