<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1108042</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-114327</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Evaluation of Improved and Selected Brachiaria Grass Cultivars in DRC
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Musale</surname><given-names>M. D. Katunga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mbusa</surname><given-names>Tshikoly</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Losimba</surname><given-names>M. Bofunga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dhengo</surname><given-names>Ngona</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Katunga</surname><given-names>F. Balemirwe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Balemirwe</surname><given-names>Mushagalusa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mukengere</surname><given-names>P. Nshokano</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ntumulo</surname><given-names>P. Mugisho</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Programme National de Recherche Sur l’élevage (PNRE), Institut National Pour l’Etude et la Recherche Agronomiques (INERA), Mulungu, Democratic Republic of the Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université du Cinquantenaire de Lwiro, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Programme National de Recherche Sur l’élevage (PNRE), Institut National Pour l’Etude et la Recherche Agronomiques (INERA), Nioka, Democratic Republic of the Congo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Food security has become a major concern in DRC. Animal production decreases dramatically due to wars while still managed in an extensive system. Productivity is low due especially to low diseases control, lack of animal feed and low extension services. Meanwhile, the DRC has a huge agricultural potential characterized by sufficient rainfall, a major river system, a high diversity of soils and broad sunshine. To contribute to face this malnutrion, three Brachiaria varieties: 
  B. decumbens CV. Basilisk, 
  B. brizantha (CVs. Xaraes, Piat&#227;) and two controls: 
  Pennisetum purpureum and 
  Brachiaria ruziziensis were evaluated in the multi-location trials in Nioka and Mulungu in Randomized Complete Block Design with 4 replications. Space between replication was 1m. Basal manure was applied at 8 t/ha in both sites. After land preparation, each hole received one plantlet of forages evaluated. Parameters observed every 4 weeks in the plot randomly placed over the 2 central rows during one year were: pests and diseases attacks; number of tillers; plant height. To assess the dry matter yield, cutting was randomly placed over the 2 central rows of the herbage every 8 weeks. Harvested fresh material was weighed and sub-sample (400 g) collected and dried at 105&#176;C for 48 hours for dry weight determination. Data were analyzed by Statistix 0.8 software. Results showed that pests and diseases attacks were not significantly important for all the forage species and cultivars. Brachiaria Cultivars’ evaluation showed successively that the two best forages based on a number of tillers were 
  B. decumbens CV. Basilisk 78.4 and 
  B. ruziziensis 54.5, on the height there were 
  P. purpureum 279.7 cm and 
  B. brizantha CV. Piata, 100.9 cm and on weight biomass 
  B. decumbens CV. Basilisk 3320.3 Kg DM ha
  <sup>-1</sup> and 
  P. purpureum 3175.5 Kg DM ha
  <sup>-1</sup>. The two other Brachiaria Cultivars introduced can be also recommended to the farmers according to their good yield.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Forages</kwd><kwd> Brachiaria</kwd><kwd> Adaptation</kwd><kwd> Growth</kwd><kwd> Yield</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Located in Central Africa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has 2.345.409 km<sup>2</sup> of national territory, 71.712.867 inhabitants with 65% in the rural area. Rate of population increasing is 3.5% per year. Contribution of agriculture to GDP is 43% in 2009 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref1">1</xref>] and as proportion of livestock GDP 9.2% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref2">2</xref>]. Major livestock species and their numbers are: cattle 755,500, sheep 900,470, goats 4,027,950, swine 961,090 chickens and 19,080,437 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Mulungu soils are from recent volcanic eruption with pH (water) 5.2, K (EXK100G) 0.4, Ca (EXK100G) 7.5 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref4">4</xref>] when in Nioka, soils origin is from granite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref5">5</xref>]. Food security has become a major concern for the entire population in DRC. This is particularly the case of animal proteins and crops which are not enough to nourish people. Animal production decreases considerably due to recent wars while it remains managed in an extensive system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref4">4</xref>]. Productivity is low due especially to low diseases control, lack of animal feed and low extension services [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref6">6</xref>]. Meanwhile, the Democratic Republic of the Congo has a huge agricultural potential characterized by sufficient rainfall, a major river system, a high diversity of soils and broad sunshine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref7">7</xref>]. Despite this importance, in South Kivu, consumption of red meat, pork and chicken was low in all Mandate Areas with an exception of Ruzizi plains where the average consumption frequency of red meat was 4 times a month [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>To contribute to facing the problems of lack of animal proteins in DRC, Bec’A-ILRI decided in this work to reintroduce in Sud-Kivu and Ituri provinces, some cultivars of improved brachiaria from CIAT in South America.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Treatments: The Brachiaria in this evaluation included three varieties: B. decumbens CV. Basilisk, B. brizantha (CVs. Xaraes, Piat&#227;) and two controls; Napier grass Pennisetum purpureum (P. purpureum) and Brachiaria ruziziensis (B. ruziziensis) were evaluated in the multi-location trials in Nioka, Mahagi territory, Ituri province and at Mulungu in Kabare territory, Sud-Kivu province. Nioka is located in North Hemisphere while Mulungu is in South Hemisphere of DRC.</p><p>Design: Randomized Complete Block Design with 4 replications.</p><p>Plot size: 4 m &#215; 5 m = 20 m<sup>2</sup> (10 rows per plot), the space between replication was 1 m.</p><p>Basal fertilizer: Manure was applied at 8 ton/ha in both sites.</p><p>Land preparation: Plough and harrow the land twice to a fine tilth. All other grasses were eliminated by weeding using hand hoe.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Forages Establishment Phase</title><p>Sowing/transplanting: was done with more than 4 seeds per hole. In Mulungu site, sowing was done in June, 2017, the seedling emergence was observed in August, 2017. In Nioka, sowing was done in December, 2018, seedling emergence observed in January, 2018. After the seedling’s emergence was observed, all the holes were planted and only one plantlet per hole was kept in all the sites. Following parameters were observed every 4 weeks in the plot randomly placed over the 2 central rows during one year:</p><p>Pests and diseases: Assess pests and diseases incidences;</p><p>Number of tillers: Number of tillers was counted per plant from 4 plants within the 1 &#215; 1 m;</p><p>Plant height: Height of 4 plants within the 1 &#215; 1 m frame.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Forages Production Phase</title><p>Dry matter yield: Cutting was randomly placed over the 2 central rows every 8 weeks the herbage from 1 &#215; 1 m<sup>2</sup> net harvest area. Cutting regulation in Nioka was done in May 2019 and harvest times from November 2019 to September 2020. In Mulungu the cutting regulation was done in November 2019 and harvest times were from January 2020 to November 2020. In both two sites, cuttings were done every 8 weeks for one year. Harvested fresh material was weighed and sub-sample (400 - 500 g) collected and dried at 105˚C for 48 hours for dry weight determination. Data were analyzed by Statistix 0.8 software.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Seedling Emergence</title><p>The rates of seedlings emergence were generally good in Mulungu than in Nioka. At all, 100% of holes were planted with one plantlet per hole (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Rates of seedling emergence</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Species and Cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Repetitions/Nioka</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Repetitions/Mulungu</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup> rep.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> rep.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3<sup>rd</sup> rep.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4<sup>th</sup> rep.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup> rep.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> rep.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3<sup>rd</sup> rep.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4<sup>th</sup> rep.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean rate</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. decumbens CV Basilisk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. brizantha CV Piata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. brizantha CV Xaraes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. purpureum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. ruziziensis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Insects and Diseases Attacks</title><p>The means of insect and diseases attacks were not important for all the forage species and Cultivars (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Number of Tillers</title><p>The number of tillers was respectively in ascendant order B. decumbes CV. Basilisk (BdecBasili) 78.4, B. ruziziensis (Br) 54.5, B. brizantha CV. Xaraes (BbrizXarae) 38.4, B. brizantha CV. Piata (BbrizPiata) 38.2, and P. purpureum (Pp) 35.9 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>There was significant difference (P &lt; 0.001) between the means of forage species and Brachiaria Cultivars tiller numbers.</p><p>According to the sites, Mulungu realized a mean of 60.4 tillers when Nioka had only 29.2 tillers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). There was significant difference (P &lt; 0.001) between the means of the number of tillers in the sites. Mulungu counted many tillers than Nioka.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Insects and diseases</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Nioka</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Mulungu</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Insect inci*1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ext insect d*2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dise inci*3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ext disease*4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Insect inci*1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ext insect d*2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dise inci*3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ext disease*4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. decumbens CV Basilisk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. brizantha CV. Piata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. brizantha CV. Xaraes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. purpureum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. ruziziensis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Insect inci*1 = insect incidence, Ext insect d*2 = extent of insect damage, Dise inci*3 = disease incidence and Ext disease*4 = extent of disease.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Forages Height</title><p>Heights presented in ascending order were for the tallest P. purpureum 279.7 cm followed by B. brizantha CV. Piata 100.9 cm, B. decumbens Basilisk 96.7 cm, B. brizantha CV. Xaraes 92.8 cm and B. ruziziensis 54.5 cm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>There was significant difference (P &lt; 0.001) between the height means of the forage species and Brachiaria Cultivars in Nioka than in Mulungu site, Pennisetum purpureum was the tallest.</p><p>There was no significant difference between the means heights (P &gt; 0.05) by the Student’s t-test of heights forage species and Cultivars between the two sites.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Dry Matter Yield</title><p>Means dry matter of the forage species and Brachiaria Cultivars were significantly different P &lt; 0.0001 between the means of forages and Brachiaria Cultivars respectively in ascendant order for B. CV. decumbens Basilisk 3320.3 Kg DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, P. purpureum 3175.5 Kg DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, B. CV. brizantha Piata 2914.5 Kg DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, B. brizantha CV. Xaraes 2837.5 Kg DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> and B. ruziziensis 1677.7 Kg DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). These results showed that the high weight of biomass was recorded by B. decumbens CV. Basilisk followed by P. purpureum.</p><p>Compare to the sites, there was a highly significant difference P &lt; 0.0001 between the means of dry matter yield of forages and Brachiaria Cultivars in the sites. Mulungu site recorded to produce more biomass 3064.8 Kg DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> than Nioka with 2505.4 Kg DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Insects and Diseases Attacks</title><p>Pests and diseases attack don’t have a negative influence on the development of</p><p>the forages observed. However, according to the monthly observations some nematodes attacked especially the leaves of Brachiaria ruziziensis and in certain conditions B. decumbens CV. Basilisk, B. brizantha CV. Piata, B. brizanha CV. Xaraes. Only P. purpreum resisted to these attacks. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref9">9</xref>] observed that red spider mites attacked the underside of the leaves while the grass midge and shoot fly attacked the young growing tillers.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Number of Tillers</title><p>B. decumbens CV. Basilisk had the big number of tillers, 78.4 followed by B. ruziziensis with 54.5. In Brazil, B. decumbens CV. Xaraes had 41.5, B. brizantha</p><p>CV. Piata 48.7 and B. ruziziensis had 46.5 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref10">10</xref>]. The number of tillers compared to the sites, Mulungu had the big number than Nioka.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Height</title><p>The tallest forage was P. purpureum in both the two sites even if there were any differences of heights between the sites. At 8 weeks after emergence, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref11">11</xref>] observed that P. purpureum 9.2 cm was tallest followed in ascendant order by B. brizantha CV. Xaraes 5.3 cm, B. decumbens CV. Basilisk 4 cm and B. brizantha CV. Piata 3.5 cm.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Dry Matter Yield</title><p>B. decumbens CV. Basilisk produced more dry matter yield in all the sites and was followed by one of the control P. purpureum. In Rwanda P. purpureum produced 17.2 t DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> under legume intercropping and mulch on yield [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref12">12</xref>] which is so high than in DRC where we observed 3.2 t DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref10">10</xref>] observed that the dry matter yield after mineral fertilizer application on B. decumbens CV. Xaraes was 11,636 kg DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, B. brizantha CV. Piata 6708 kg DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, B. ruziziensis 8940 kg DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. Various dry matters yields were observed in Msabaha (Kenya) on B. decumbens CV. Basilisk 3700 kg DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, Brazil, B. decumbens CV. Xaraes 2000 kg DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, B. brizantha CV. Piata 2600 kg DM ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, they were rather less than those implemented in DRC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114327-ref13">13</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>Results of Brachiaria Cultivars evaluation in DRC showed that based on number of tillers B. decumbens CV. Basilisk was the first. According to the height, the three cultivars introduced followed P. purpureum. The high weight of biomass was recorded on B. decumbens CV. Basilisk followed by the control P. purpureum.</p><p>The two other Brachiaria Cultivars can also be recommended to the farmers according to their good yield.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) who funded this research via Bec’A-ILRI Hub. Special thanks are also addressed to Dr Sita Ghimire who chose INERA to implement this research in DRC. As a leader of the project, he monitored and evaluated all activities and revised the manuscript of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Katunga, M.M.D., Tshikoly, M., Bofunga, L.M., Ngona, D., Balemirwe, K.F., Mushagalusa, B., Nshokano, M.P. and Mugisho, N.P. (2021) Evaluation of Improved and Selected Brachiaria Grass Cultivars in DRC. Open Access Library Journal, 8: e8042. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108042</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.114327-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">[FAO] Food Agriculture Organization (2013) Democratic Republic of the Congo BEFS Country Brief.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114327-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">[FAO] Food Agriculture Organization (2005) Livestock Sector Brief Democratic Republic of the Congo Livestock Sector Brief Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAO Livestock Information, Sector Analysis and Policy Branch AGAL.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114327-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">[SNSA] Service national des statistiques agricoles juillet 2012: Annuaire des statistiques agricoles (2000-2006) Ministère national de l’agriculture et du développement rural Secrétariat général à l’agriculture, pêche et élevage RDC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114327-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Katunga, M.M.D. (2014) Evaluation des légumineuses fourragères dans un système d’élevage Editions universitaires européennes (08-07-2014) ISBN: 976-613-1-58478-7. PhD Thesis, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, RDC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114327-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liben, L. and Sperry, T. (1954) Soils and Vegetation Map of Belgian Congo, Rwanda and Burundi, 4 Nioka Explanation, Note of Soils and Vegetations Map of Ituri A,B,C. Publications of INEAC, Bruxelles, 31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114327-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SNSA Service national des statistiques agricoles RDC. Annuaire des statistiques agricoles (2011) Ministère national de l’agriculture et du développement rural Secrétariat général à l’agriculture, pêche et élevage RDC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114327-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Minagridral (2013) Ministère de l’agriculture et du développement rural, plan national d’investissement agricole PNIA 2013-2020 Ministère Agriculture et développement rural RDC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114327-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouma, E., Birachi, E., Pypers, P., Van Lauwe, B., Ekesa, B., Blomme, G., Chianu, J., Bouwmeester, H., Van Asten, P., Van Schagen, B., Nyagaya, M., Hakizimana, S., Bizimana, S., Gahigi, A., Ndayitegeye, O., Kantengwa, S., Lodi, L.J., Katunga, M.M., Bishikwabo, K. and Vigheri, N.P. (2011) CIALCA Baselines Report. 142 p.  
https://www.cialca.org/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114327-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Njarui, D.M.G., Gatheru, M., Ghimire, S.R. and Mureithi, J.G. (2016) Effects of Seasons and Cutting Intervals on Productivity and Nutritive Value of Brachiaria Grass Cultivars in Semi-Arid Eastern Kenya. Climate Smart Brachiaria Grasses for Improving Livestock Production in East Africa—Kenya Experience Proceedings of the Workshop, Naivasha, Kenya, 14-15 September 2016, 46-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114327-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodrigues, R.C., Sousa, T.V.R., Melo, M.A.A., Araújo, J.S., Lana, R.P., Costa, C.S., Oliveira, M.E., Parente, M.O.M. and Sampaio, I.B.M. (2014) Agronomic, Morphogenic and Structural Characteristics of Tropical Forage Grasses in Northeast Brazil. Tropical Grasslands—Forrajes Tropicales, 2, 214-222.  
https://doi.org/10.17138/TGFT(2)214-222</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114327-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kifuko-Koech, M.N., Mutoko, M.C. and Ndung’U-Magiroi, K.W. (2016) Establishment and Early Growth of Brachiaria Grass Cultivars in Acidic Soils of Western Kenya. Climate Smart Brachiaria Grasses for Improving Livestock Production in East Africa—Kenya Experience Proceedings of the Workshop, Naivasha, Kenya, 14-15 September 2016, 80-89.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114327-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barahenda, M., Shem, M.N., Kanuya, N.L., Ntakabeza, I., Gasana, J., Uwimana, G., Umunezero, O. and Uwumukiza, D. (2007) Yield Potential Grass-Legume Pastures under Different Management Conditions. Research Journal of Animal Sciences, 1, 59-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114327-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ondiko, C.N., Njunie, M.N. and Ngode, L. (2016) Establishment and Growth of Brachiaria Grass Cultivars in the Coastal Lowlands of Kenya. Climate Smart Brachiaria Grasses for Improving Livestock Production in East Africa—Kenya Experience Proceedings of the Workshop, Naivasha, Kenya, 14-15 September 2016, 37-45.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>