<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2021.912012</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-114303</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Fractional Crystallization and Crustal Contamination of Doleritic and Trachytic Dykes Crosscutting the Cretaceous Sedimentary Basins from Figuil (North Cameroon) and L&#233;r&#233; (South-Western Chad): Geodynamic Implications
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moussa</surname><given-names>Ngarena Klamadji</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Merlin</surname><given-names>Gountié Dedzo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rigobert</surname><given-names>Tchameni</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Djamilatou</surname><given-names>Diddi Hamadjoda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pierre</surname><given-names>Christel Biakan à Nyotok</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gervais</surname><given-names>Onana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Maroua, Maroua, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Life and Earth Sciences, High Teachers’ Training College, University of Maroua, Maroua, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Ngaoundéré, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Département des Sciences de la Vie et de la Terre, Faculté des Sciences Techniques et de la Technologie, Université de Pala, 
Pala, Tchad</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>190</fpage><lpage>210</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Magmatism in the Cretaceous sedimentary basins of the Figuil and L&#233;r&#233; regions constitutes one of the fundamental parameters in the reconstruction of the history of the Cretaceous sedimentary basins. The main objective of this paper is to constrain the petrogenetic processes of hypovolcanic rocks and to determine their geodynamic context of emplacement. The petrographic study of mafic hypovolcanic and trachytic rocks was carried out under a polarizing microscope on thin sections. For the geochemical study, the major oxides and some trace elements were analyzed by ICP-AES. Trace and rare earth elements were analyzed by ICP-MS. The dolerites of the Cretaceous sedimentary basins are composed of dykes of amphibole bearing dolerites, biotite and pyroxene bearing dolerite, pyroxene bearing dolerites and trachytes. The dykes are in the order of 20 to 100 m wide by several kilometers long and oriented from N23
  &amp;#176;E to N90
  &amp;#176;E. The textures of these rocks are sub-ophitic to intergranular for dolerites and trachytic for evolved rocks (trachytes). The geochemical study shows that the dolerites are basaltic in composition with alkaline to subalkaline character. The sampled dykes have an evolution dominated by fractional with the minor impact of the crustal assimilation characterized by low Rb/Y ratios for dolerites (0.36 - 0.97) and high values of Rb/Y for the Pan-African granitoid
  s’
   samples (1.95 - 4.01).
   
  The nature of doleritic and trachytic magma sources is supported by their (Tb/Yb)N &gt; 1.9 (1.91 - 3.79) and Dy/Yb &gt; 2 (2.32 - 3.50) ratios of most samples, which suggests melting in a garnet-bearing mantle. Concerning the geodynamic context of the studied rocks, doleritic samples are classified as within-plate tholeiite and volcanic arc basalt, and within-plate alkali basalts.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Dolerites</kwd><kwd> Trachyte</kwd><kwd> Sedimentary Basins</kwd><kwd> Continental Tholeiites</kwd><kwd> Figuil and L&#233;r&#233;</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Magmatic intrusions usually made up of basic and ultrabasic rocks generally exploit fracturing networks to set up (Srivastava, 2011; Silpa et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2021). The geochemical characteristics of these magmatic intrusions provide, on the one hand, elements in the reconstruction of regional geodynamic contexts, synchronous for their establishment and, on the other hand, information on the source zones of the magmas (Halls, 1987). In Central Africa, magmatic intrusions of a doleritic nature are represented by two subsets: the dolerites of the extension basins and the so-called continental tholeiite dolerites. Dolerites from extension basins have been identified in Anambra in Nigeria (Coulon et al., 1996) and in northern Cameroon, in the region of Mayo Oulo-L&#233;r&#233; and Babouri-Figuil (Ngounouno et al., 2001). The formation of basic to intermediate intrusions which very often outcrop in dykes and sills is considered to be a direct consequence of tectonic events that have affected the Pan-African basement (Toteu et al., 1987, 1990). In Cameroon, mafic dykes have been studied in southern Cameroon in many localities: 1) Biden in the south-east of Ngaound&#233;r&#233; (Vicat et al., 2001); 2) Mayo Oulo-L&#233;r&#233; (Ngounouno et al., 2001); 3) Bangant&#233;, Maham, Kendem, Dschang, Bangoua and Manjo (Tchouankou&#233; et al., 2012, 2014); 4) Mbaoussi (Nkouandou et al., 2016); 5) Likok (Nkouandou et al., 2015); 6) Mongo in Central Chad (Nkouandou et al., 2017); 7) Temte (Poli) in North Cameroon (Atour et al., 2020); 8) Figuil and L&#233;r&#233; (Far North Cameroon and SW of Chad) where these dykes intersect the Pan-African basement (Klamadji et al., 2020). In the Cretaceous sedimentary basins of the study area, straddling Cameroon and Chad (Figuil and L&#233;r&#233;), basic intrusions of a doleritic nature have so far not been the subject of a detailed petrological study. The main objective of this study is to constrain the petrogenetic processes of these hypovolcanic rocks and to determine their geodynamic context using major and trace elements’ data.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Geological Background of Cretaceous Sedimentary Basins from Figuil and L&#233;r&#233; (Mayo-Oulo-L&#233;r&#233;)</title><p>The Mayo Oulo-L&#233;r&#233; basin, in which the dykes studied are located, is a semi-graben with an asymmetric syncline structure belonging to the intracontinental basins of North Cameroon (Dejax &amp; Brunet, 1996). It is made up of the other small sedimentary basins (Babouri-Figuil, Hama-koussou and Koum) with Wealidian facies of the Lower Cretaceous whose history is linked to the formation of the B&#233;nou&#233; ditch. The main geological units in the area include the Precambrian basement dated Meso to Neo-Proterozoic between −700 to −1000 Ma (Dawa&#239;, 2014); a thick sedimentary layer dated from the Lower Cretaceous which lies in discordance on the Precambrian basement and post-Pan-African magmatic occurrences (Schwoerer, 1965). The magmatic rocks of L&#233;r&#233; and Figuil intersected a basement of Middle to Upper Proterozoic age, covered with sediments of Lower Cretaceous age which were deposited in the two basins of 1000 km<sup>2</sup> surface (Schwoerer, 1965). The sedimentary cover formations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>)</p><p>consist of two series: 1) the L&#233;r&#233; series in the western extension of Lake L&#233;r&#233;, and 2) the Lam&#233; series west of Pala in the region by Lam&#233; (Wacrenier, 1952). In the South and South-East, these formations are made up of the tertiary ferruginous sandstone of Pala (Maurin &amp; Guiraud, 1990).</p><p>The L&#233;r&#233; series contains formations from the Lower Cretaceous (Aptian-Albian). These formations are made up of thin thickness conglomerates, surmounted by coarse sandstone more or less arkosic and fine and tender sandstone, sometimes with ripple marks (elongated ridge forming a relief) alternating with greenish marls which contain some traces of limestone. Dolerite sills are interbedded there. These conglomerates, arkosic sandstones alternate with schists. In Figuil (North Cameroon), bituminous shales occupy a graben which continues east of Lake L&#233;r&#233; and develops on Cameroonian territory.</p><p>The Lam&#233; series is made up of formations of marine and continental origin from the Upper Cretaceous (Albian-Cenomanian) (Maurin &amp; Guiraud, 1990). The formations consist of coarse conglomerates surmounted by arkoses, sandstones, limestone sandstones, marls, clays and lenses with lumachelles of lagoon origin. The conglomerates found along the border of the basin, north of Pala contain pebbles and boulders up to 30 cm in diameter. The limestones appearing mainly between Baoar&#233; and Louga, near the Cameroon border, provided molluscs (Gastropods). It is crosscut by veins and laccolites of basalt and olivine bearing dolerites.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Sampling and Analytical Methods</title><p>A total of seven (7) samples were collected from the different dykes outcropping in the area. They were then carefully cleaned and, labeled. The preparation of thin sections was realized at Key laboratory Coalbeb Methane Resource and Reservoir Training in China. These samples were then also sent to Bureau Veritas Mineral Laboratories in Vancouver, Canada for major and trace element geochemical analyzes according to the techniques described by Klamadji et al. (2020). Rock powder of each sample (0.2 g) was added to lithium metaborate/lithium tetraborate flux (0.90 g), well mixed and fused in a furnace at 1000˚C. The resulting melt was then cooled and dissolved in 100 ml of 4% nitric acid and 2% hydrochloric acid. This solution was then analyzed by a combination of ICP-MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry) and ICP-AES (inductively-coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry) to determine major and trace element compositions of the samples. The obtained results were corrected for spectral inter-element interferences. Oxide concentration was calculated from the determined elemental concentration and the result was reported in that format. Loss on ignition (LOI) was measured by weight difference after ignition at 1000˚C. To certify data quality (95% confidence level) and to calibrate the equipment for optimal precision, a replicate, standard and blank was measured. For the major oxides, the analytical uncertainties were about 0.01 wt%, apart from Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (0.04%). The detection limits for trace elements were variable as follow (in ppm): Ni (20); V (8); Ba, Sc, Be, Sn (1); Ga, Sr, W (0.5); Nd (0.3); Co, Th (0.2); Cs, Hf, Nb, Rb, Ta, U, Zr, Y, La, Ce (0.1); Sm, Gd, Dy, Yb (0.05); Er (0.03); Pr, Eu, Ho (0.02); Tb, Tm, Lu (0.01). Results of petrography and geochemistry analysis are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Petrography</title><p>The hypovolcanic and volcanic dykes that are the subject of this work are dolerites and trachytes with length varying from 0.38 to 9.5 km and width ranging</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Petrographic and structural characteristics of the studied dykes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BPD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Trachyte</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orientation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >–</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N23˚E - N45˚E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N30˚ - 60˚E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N90˚E</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 35 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 100 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 - 100 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 - 75 m</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Length</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 - 40 m in diameter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 9.5 km</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 7 km</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 4 km</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mineralogy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pl + Cpx + Amp + Afs + Bt + Opq + Ap + Ep + Chl + Ttn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pl + Afs + Cpx + Bt+ Qtz + Opq + Ep + Chl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pl + Afs + Cpx + Qtz + Opq + Ep + Ch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pl + Sa + Bt + Opq Ep + Chl</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>AD: amphibole bearing dolerites; BPD: biotite and pyroxene bearing dolerites; PD: pyroxene bearing dolerites. Cpx: clinopyroxene; Pl: plagioclase; Opq: opaque; Amp: amphibole; Bt: biotite; Afs: alkali feldspar; Sa: sanidine; Qtz: quartz; Ap: apatite; Ttn: titanite; Ep: epidote; Chl: chlorite.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Whole-rock major and trace element composition of the Figuil and L&#233;r&#233; dykes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample ID</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DiM3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ZaM1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T2M3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T2M1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DjM2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FtgM3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FmsM1</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rock type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trachyte</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Major (Wt%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg#</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traces (ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Be</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >178.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >196.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >199.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >360</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >390</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >360</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ga</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >761.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >379.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >301.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >313.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1099.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >557.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >498.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >708.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >La</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ce</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ho</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Er</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >U</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eu/Eu*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nb/Nb*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>AD: amphibole bearing dolerites; BPD: biotite and pyroxene bearing dolerites; PD: pyroxene bearing dolerites.</p><p>from 30 to 100 m (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The petrographic study reveals mineral assemblage characteristics of dolerites and trachyte. For instance, we have assemblages of plagioclase, clinopyroxene, amphibole, alkali feldspar, quartz, biotite, oxides and apatite that characterize dolerites, and assemblage of plagioclase, sanidine, biotite and opaques minerals characterizing trachytes. All the rock-types present chlorites and epidotes as secondary minerals.</p><sec id="s4_1_1"><title>4.1.1. Amphibole-Bearing Dolerites</title><p>At Dissing, amphibole bearing dolerites (AD) outcrop in the form of decimetric and metric blocks with an annular shape of 38 to 40 m diameter. AD are characterized by a sub-ophitic texture. The minerals observed are phenocrysts and microcrystals of plagioclase, clinopyroxenes, amphiboles, biotite, alkali feldspars, opaque. Plagioclases which are the most abundant minerals appear in phenocrysts which are generally quite automorphic and in microliths (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a)).</p><p>Inclusions of accessory minerals such as apatite and titanite have been observed in some sections.</p></sec><sec id="s4_1_2"><title>4.1.2. Pyroxene-Bearing Dolerites</title><p>The pyroxene bearing dolerites (PD) of Tchintchou Golomb&#233; outcrop in the form of a rectilinear dyke oriented N30˚ - 60˚E (75 to 100 m width and &gt;5000 m long) with blocks of centimetric (10 to 24 cm) to metric (1.2 &#215; 2.8 m) in diameter. The PD have a sub-ophitic texture (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)) and are made up of plagioclase, clinopyroxene, alkali feldspars, quartz, opaque minerals, epidote and chlorite. Damourite also occurs as a secondary mineral of plagioclase alteration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)).</p></sec><sec id="s4_1_3"><title>4.1.3. Biotite and Pyroxene-Bearing Dolerites</title><p>The biotite and pyroxene bearing dolerites (BPD) are observed in blocks (up to 3.7 m diameter) and flagstones at Zalbi, Teuch&#233;n&#233; and Djalingo. They outcrop in the form of rectilinear dyke with N23˚E to N45˚E orientation, 50 - 100 m width and approximately 9.5 km long. Under microscope, the BPD show an intergranular texture (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c)) characterized by plagioclase, alkali feldspars, clinopyroxenes, biotite, quartz, opaque minerals, epidote and chlorite.</p></sec><sec id="s4_1_4"><title>4.1.4. Trachyte</title><p>The trachyte also outcrops in the form of a rectilinear dyke (E-W) in the Cretaceous sedimentary basins of Babouri-Figuil and consists of large decimetric (9 &#215; 12 dm) to metric (1.5 &#215; 4.2 m) blocks and flagstones. Porphyrtic texture of this trachytic dolerite is made up of alkali feldspar, plagiocalse and amphibole (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d)).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Geochemical Characterization</title><sec id="s4_2_1"><title>4.2.1. Major Elements Geochemistry</title><p>The geochemical analyzes of the dolerite and trachyte samples are reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>Using the TAS diagram (Le Bas et al., 1986), dolerites are mainly basaltic, except the FmsM1 sample which is placed in the trachyte fields (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The pyroxene bearing dolerites (PD) and biotite and pyroxene bearing dolerites (BPD) are sub-alkaline while trachyte and amphibole bearing dolerites (AD) are alkaline. The overall chemical composition is relatively homogeneous for dolerites: 48.25 wt% &lt; SiO<sub>2</sub> &lt; 52.59 wt%; 2.73 wt% &lt; Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O &lt; 4.86 wt%; 10.62 &lt; Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> &lt; 12.05 wt%; 5.40 wt% &lt; MgO &lt; 6.95 wt%; 1.67% &lt; TiO<sub>2</sub> &lt; 2.63 wt%; 14 wt% &lt; Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> &lt; 14.72 wt%.</p><p>AS suggested by the Th/Ta ratio (1.40 - 1.66) (Cabanis &amp; Thieblemont, 1988), these dolerites belong to the continental tholeiite series. In fact, in the AFM diagram (Irvine &amp; Baragar, 1971), all the dolerite samples are placed in the tholeiitic domain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a)) except for the trachyte sample which is found in the calc-alkaline field. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(c) confirm the fact that studied dolerites have tholeiitic composition. The silica content is within</p><p>the range of continental tholeiites described elsewhere (Carmichael et al., 1974): Karoo dolerites (SiO<sub>2</sub> = 50.6% to 53.6%), middle diabases of eastern North America North (SiO<sub>2</sub> = 51.1%), Columbia River basalts (SiO<sub>2</sub> = 50.0 to 54.4%), Mayo Oulo-L&#233;r&#233; and Babouri-Figuil dolerites (SiO<sub>2</sub> = 51.72%; (Ngounouno et al., 2001).</p><p>Harker diagrams for major elements present each oxide plotted against MgO wt% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Negative correlations are observed for Na<sub>2</sub>O, K<sub>2</sub>O, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> (Figures 6(a)-(e)) while positive correlations are visible for Fe<sub>2</sub>O, TiO<sub>2</sub>, MnO and CaO (Figures 6(f)-(i)). These major element trends are compatible with an evolution of the magmas through the fractionation.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_2"><title>4.2.2. Trace Elements Geochemistry</title><p>Transitional metal like Cr, Co, Ni, and V varies from one facies to another: amphibole bearing (Cr: 290 ppm; Co: 43.5 ppm; Ni: 94 ppm; V: 190 ppm), biotite and pyroxene bearing dolerites (Cr: 120 - 390 ppm; Co: 33.1 - 40.3 ppm; Ni: 50 - 122 ppm; V: 168 - 199 ppm), pyroxene bearing dolerites (Cr: 360 ppm; Co: 37.3 ppm; Ni: 121 ppm; V: 171 ppm). Trachyte has high levels Ba, Sr, Rb and Th, and low in Sc, V, Ni and Co. The Sc, Ni, Cr and Sr contents increase with increasing MgO (Figures 7(a)-(d)) while the contents of Rb, Nb, La and Zr decrease with the increase of MgO (Figures 7(e)-(i)).</p><p>The rare earth elements spectra normalized to chondrites (Sun &amp; McDonough, 1989) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a)) of AD, BPD and PD attest to the low fractionation of rare earth elements (ΣREE = 45.95 - 130, 32 ppm) for dolerites; ΣREE for trachyte is approximately 212.8 ppm. They also show a regular negative slope characterized by a low enrichment in LREE ((La/Yb) N = 3.33 - 65.99) similar to the fractionation of HREE ((Gd/Yb) N = 2.22 - 5.36). These rocks exhibit a slight positive Europium anomaly (Eu/Eu* = 1.01 - 1.08). Primitive-mantle normalized (Sun &amp; Mc- Donough, 1989) spider diagrams of the dolerites and trachyte are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b) and display a strongly negative slope characterized by a strong enrichment</p><p>in LILE (Rb, Ba, Th) compared to HFSEs (Hf, Zr, Y). The dolerites show negative anomalies in U, Th, Ce and Nd, and positive anomalies in Ba,K, Nb and Sr.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Fractional Crystallization</title><p>The major and trace elements systematics together with the petrographic observations of the studied samples suggest important level of continuous crystallization of mineral phases from their parental magmas. For example, the low contents of (Ni &lt; 122 ppm), (Co &lt; 43 ppm), MgO (average of 6.02%) and Mg# (&lt;58) testify that the parental magmas would have undergone a significant fractionation of ferromagnesian minerals (Arth, 1976; Frey et al., 1978; Xu et al., 2001) within the magma chamber or as they ascend to the surface of the earth’s crust. The negative correlation in P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> would be compatible with the presence of apatite which was unfortunately not observed in thin sections. The decrease in Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and Sr contents is the result of the significant fractionation of plagioclase feldspars. The continuous decrease in Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> associated with regularly decrease in Mgo, indicates a stage of fractionation of Fe-Ti oxides during the evolution of the magma. The crystallization of clinopyroxene is characterized by a decrease in CaO (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(i)), Sc and Cr (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a), (c)) concentrations at decreasing MgO contents. La/Sm vs. La diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(a)) show nearly linear trend expressing fractional crystallization and high gradient lines demonstrating partial melting (Stephen, 2006). Despite a relative dispersion of the data in some cases, the different plots show an almost linear positive correlation between the incompatible elements (Figures 9(b)-(d)). The Nb vs. La, Zr and Rb diagrams of mafic magmatic rocks in the study area suggest an alignment of points on a line passing through the origin. On the other hand, lines not passing through the origin reflect the evolution of magmas from multiple sources and/or variable modalities of magmatic mixtures or crustal contamination. The behavior of the data in these different diagrams confirms that the hypovolcanic rocks of Figuil and L&#233;r&#233; evolved through fractional crystallization. The collinear variations of the trace elements also indicate the probable development of fractional crystallization processes operating in more or less enriched and/or contaminated mantel-derived magmas.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Crustal Contamination</title><p>In the Th/Yb vs. Ta/Yb diagram of Pearce (1982) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(a)) the samples are cluster at the initial point of the fractional crystallization process. They plot within the mantle array and seem to have a positive correlation similar to that of</p><p>uncontaminated lavas. The low effect of contamination by crustal fragments can be also evidenced in the Rb/Y vs. Nb/Y diagram of Cox &amp; Hawkesworth (1985) and Leeman &amp; Hawkesworth (1986) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(b)). In this diagram, the studied dolerites (Rb/Y: 0.36 - 0.97) are plotted far from Pan-African granitoids’ samples (Rb/Y: 1.95 - 4.01) suggesting the minor impact of the crustal assimilation compared to the fractional crystallization on magma compositions.</p><p>The dolerite samples chemical compositions also show Nb/U (28.33 - 47.00), La/Nb (0.65 - 1.55), and Th/Nb (0.06 - 0.10) ratios like those of MORB characterized by high values of the Nb/U ratio (&gt;45) and low values of the La/Nb ratio (0.8 - 1.1) and Th/Nb (&lt;0.1) (Sun &amp; McDonough, 1989; Hofmann et al., 1986; Hollanda et al., 2006), and far from the continental crust that has a low value of the ratio Nb/U (4.4 - 25) and high values of the ratios of La/Nb (1.6 - 2.6) and Th/Nb (0.24 - 0.88) according to Rudnick et al. (2003). These features indicate a negligible effect of crustal contamination. The positive Nb-Ta anomalies (Nb/Nb*: 1.04 - 1.25) in all dolerites also signify the nonexistence of contamination by crustal materials.</p></sec><sec id="s5_3"><title>5.3. Mantle Source and Melting</title><p>Given that the magma migrated through continental basement rocks, consequently the origin of the dolerites and trachyte from the melting of the continental Pan African granitoids cannot be excluded. However, trace elements ratios, principally incompatible ones, Ba/Nb and Rb/Zr (LILE/HFSE) are superior in the Pan-African granitoids rocks from Zabili (south-western Chad) (9.88 - 45.89 and 0.19 - 1.29, respectively; (Isseini et al., 2012) than those of L&#233;r&#233; and figuil dolerites (8.84 - 22.02 and 0.02 - 0.06, respectively) and thus disqualify the derivation of the studied samples from the melting of the crustal rocks.</p><p>The nature of doleritic and trachytic magma source is supported by their (Tb/Yb)N &gt; 1.9 (1.91 - 3.79) and Dy/Yb &gt; 2 (2.32 - 3.50) ratios of most samples, which suggests melting in a garnet-bearing mantle (Wang et al., 2002; Jung et al., 2006). The normalizing values are of Sun &amp; MCDonough (1989). The Nb/Ta and Zr/Hf ratios of dolerites (14.60 - 19.32 and 34.35 - 41.84), respectively) are analogous to those of trachyte (14.34 and 46.48), respectively), signifying that doleritic and trachytic magmas are co-genetic.</p></sec><sec id="s5_4"><title>5.4. Geodynamic and Geotectonic Context</title><p>Following the classifications of Ivrine &amp; Baragar (1971), Miyashiro (1974) and Floyd &amp; Winchester (1975) (Figures 5(a)-(c)), the dolerites was previously classified in tholeiitic series. The geodynamic and geotectonic context of the doleritic samples is approved in the Zr/4 - 2Nb-Y triangular diagram of Meschede (1986) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1(a)) where almost all of the mafic magmatic hypovolcanic rocks were plotted in the field of within-plate tholeiite and volcanic arc basalt. Only the amphibole bearing dolerite is classified as within-plate alkali basalts and trachyte is not classified. This geotectonic context is also confirmed by a binary Zr/Y vs. Zr diagram of geotectonic discrimination (Pearce &amp; Norry, 1979) of basaltic rocks where the dolerites are plot in within-plate basalts field (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1(b)); only the trachyte sample which is characterized by high Zr/Y</p><p>(55.78) is not classified. Continental tholeiites were also identified in other localities in Cameroon and Chad (crosscutting the Pan-African basement) at Figuil and L&#233;r&#233; (Klamadji et al., 2020), Mayo Oulo-L&#233;r&#233; and Babouri-Figuil (Ngounouno et al., 2001), Balch&#233; and Mangba&#239; (B&#233;a et al., 1990), Biden (Vicat et al., 2001), Dschang, Bangangt&#233; and Manjo (Tchouankou&#233; et al., 2012), Mbaoussi (Nkouandou et al., 2016), Bafoussam (Kouankap Nono et al., 2013).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>The chemical study of studied dykes shows that mafic samples (dolerites) are predominantly basaltic in composition, while the felsic one is trachytic. Based on the mineralogical geochemical compositions, three groups of dolerites are identified: the pyroxene bearing dolerites (PD) and biotite and pyroxene bearing dolerites (BPD) are sub-alkaline while amphibole bearing dolerites (AD) and trachyte are alkaline. The rocks of the studied area have an evolution dominated by a fractional process with negligible impact of the crustal contamination characterized by low Rb/Y ratios for dolerites (0.36 - 0.97) and high values of Rb/Y for the Pan-African granitoids’ samples (1.95 - 4.01). The nature of doleritic and trachytic magma sources is supported by their (Tb/Yb)N &gt; 1.9 (1.91 - 3.79) and Dy/Yb &gt; 2 (2.32 - 3.50) ratios of most samples, which suggests melting in a garnet-bearing mantle. Regarding the geodynamic and geotectonic context of the studied rocks, doleritic samples are classified as 1) Within-plate tholeiite and volcanic arc basalt; 2) Within-plate alkali basalts.</p><p>In the future, we plan to increase the number of analyzes in these dolerite formations in order to better characterize them geochemically. Isotopic data will be needed to better characterize the source of these rocks. In order to insert the dolerite dykes studied in the context of CPAC, radiogenic dating will be also necessary.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This paper is a part of doctoral research being done by Klamadji Moussa Ngarena. Boris Chako-Tchamab&#233; and anonymous reviewers are thanked for useful remarks which helped us to improve the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Klamadji, M.N., Gounti&#233; Dedzo, M, Tchameni, R., Diddi Hamadjoda, D., Biakan &#224; Nyotok, P. C., &amp; Onana, G. (2021). Fractional Crystallization and Crustal Contamination of Doleritic and Trachytic Dykes Crosscutting the Cretaceous Sedimentary Basins from Figuil (North Cameroon) and L&#233;r&#233; (South-Western Chad): Geodynamic Implications. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 9, 190-210. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2021.912012</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.114303-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Arth</surname><given-names> J. G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1976</year>)<article-title>. Behavior of Trace Elements during Magmatic Processes-Summary of Theoretical Models and Their Applications. Journal of Research of the U.S</article-title><source> Geological Survey</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 41</fpage>-<lpage>47</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atour, M. M., Bardinntzeff, J. M., Mefire, A. F., Nkouandou, O. F., Tchameni, R., &amp; Dinamou, A. (2020). Petrology and Geochemical Framework of Dolerites Dykes of Temté, North Cameroon, Central Africa. Acta Geochimica, 40, 287-299.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-020-00432-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Béa, A. Cochemé, J. J., Trompette, R., Affaton, P., Soba, D., &amp; Sougy, J. (1990). Grabens d’age paléozo&amp;#239;que inférieur et volcanisme tholéiitique associé dans la région de Garoua au Nord-Cameroun. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 10, 657-667.https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(90)90032-A</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bouyo, H. M., Zhao, Y., Penaye, J., Zhang, S. H., &amp; Njel, U. O. (2015). Neoproterozo&amp;#239;c Subduction Related Metavolcanic and Metasedimentary Rocks from the Rey Bouba Greenstone Belt of North-Central Cameroon in the Central African Fold Belt: New Insights into a Continental Arc Geodynamic Setting. Precambrian Research, 261, 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.01.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cabanis, B., &amp; Thiéblemont, D. (1988). La discrimination des tholéiites continentales et des basaltes arrièrearc; Proposition d’un nouveau diagramme, le triangle Th-3xTb-2xTa. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 86, 927-935.https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.IV.6.927</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carmichael, I. S. E., Turner, F. J., &amp; Verhoogen, J. (1974). Modal and Chemical Compositions of the Granitic Rocks Related to the Major Molybdenum. Journal of the Geology Society of Japan, 77, 441-452. https://doi.org/10.5575/geosoc.77.441</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coulon, C., Vidal, P., Dupuy, C., Popoff, B., Popoff, M., Maluski, H., &amp; Hermitte, D. (1996). The Mesozoic to Early Cenozoic Magmatism of the Benue Trough (Nigeria); Geochemical Evidence for the Involvement of the St Helena Plume. Journal of Petrology, 34, 1341-1358. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/37.6.1341</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cox, K. G., &amp; Hawkesworth, C. J. (1985). Relative Contribution of Crust and Mantle to Flood Basalt Magmatism, Mahabaleshwar, Deccan Traps. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 310, 627-641. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1984.0011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dawa&amp;#239;, D. (2014). Les plutons de Guider et de Bossoum-Pologozom (Cha&amp;#238;ne Panafricaine au Nord du Cameroun): Analyse pétrographique, structurale, magnétique et géochronologique et implication géodynamique. Thèse de Doctorat en Géosciences. Environnement, Université de Toulouse, 260 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dejax</surname><given-names> J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Brunet</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1996</year>)<article-title>. Les flores fossiles du bassin d’Hama-koussou, Crétacé-inférieur du Nord-Cameroun: Corrélations biostratigraphiques avec le fossé de la Bénoué, implications paléogéographiques</article-title><source> Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration-Production Elf-Aquitaine</source><volume> 16</volume>,<fpage> 145</fpage>-<lpage>173</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Floyd, P. A., &amp; Winchester, J. A. (1975) Magma Type and Tectonic Setting Discrimination Using Immobile Elements. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 27, 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(75)90031-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frey, F. A., Green, D. H., &amp; Roy, S. D. (1978). Integrated Models of Basalt Petrogenesis: A Study of Quartz Tholéiites to Olivine Melilitites from South Eastern Australia Utilizing Geochemical and Experimental Petrological Data. Journal of Petrology, 19, 463-513. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/19.3.463</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Halls, H. C. (1987). Introduction. In H. C. Halls, &amp; W. F. Fahrig (Eds.), Mafic Dyke Swarms (pp. 1-3). Geological Association of Canada.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hofmann, A. W., Jochum, K. P., Seufert, M., &amp; White, W. M. (1986). Nb and Pb in Oceanic Basalts: New Constraints on Mantle Evolution. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 79, 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(86)90038-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hollanda, M. H. B. M., Pimentel, M. M., Custodio Oliveira, D., &amp; Jardim de Sa, E. F. (2006). Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Interaction and the Origin of Cretaceous Tholeiitic Magmatism in Northeastern Brazil: Sr-Nd-Pb Isotopic Evidence. Lithos, 86, 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2005.04.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, Q., Zheng, H., Sun, X., Yang, Q., Cai, Z., &amp; Xia, B. (2021). Compositional Signatures of Dolerite Dykes from the Purang Ultramafic Massif, Tibet: Implications for Garnet-Bearing Components in the Neo-Tethyan Mantle. Lithos, 392-393, Article ID: 106157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106157</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Irvine, T. N., &amp; Baragar, W. R. (1971). A Guide to the Chemical Classification of Common Volcanic Rocks. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 8, 523-548.https://doi.org/10.1139/e71-055</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Isseini, M., André-Mayer, A. S., Vanderhaeghe, O., Barbey P., &amp; Deloule, E. (2012). A-Type Granites from the Pan-African Orogenic Belt in Southwestern Chad Constrained Using Geochemistry, Sr-Nd Isotopes and U-Pb Geochronology. Lithos, 153, 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2012.07.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jung, C., Jung, S., Hoffer, E., &amp; Berndt, J. (2006). Petrogenesis of Tertiary Mafic Alkaline Magmas in the Hocheifel, Germany. Journal of Petrology, 47, 1637-1671.https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egl023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Klamadji, M. N., Gountié Dedzo, M., Tchameni, R., &amp; Dawa&amp;#239;, D. (2020). Petrography and Geochemical Characterization of Dolerites from Figuil (Northern Cameroon) and Léré (Southwestern Chad). International Journal of Geosciences, 11, 459-482. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2020.117023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouankap Nono, G. D., Wotchoko, P., Ganno, S., Ngong Njinchuki, D., Nzenti, J. P., &amp; Suh Cheo, E. (2013) Petrochemical Characterization of Two Distinct Types of Dolerites from Bafoussam Area, West Cameroon. International Journal of Geosciences, 4, 1131-1144. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2013.48107</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le Bas, M. J., Le Maitre, R. W., Streckeisen, A., &amp; Zanettin, B. (1986). A Chemical Classification of Volcanic Rocks Based on the Total Alkali-Silica Diagram. Journal of Petrology, 27, 745-750. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/27.3.745</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leeman, W. P., &amp; Hawkesworth, C. J. (1986). Open Magma System: Trace Element and Isotopic Constraints. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 91, 5901-5912. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB06p05901</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maurin, J. C., &amp; Guiraud, R. (1990). Relationships between Tectonics and Sedimentation in the Barremo-Aptian Intracontinental Basins of Northern Cameroon. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 10, 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(90)90064-L</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meschede, M. (1986). A Method of Discriminating between Different Types of Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalts and Continental Tholeiites with Nb-Zr-Y Diagram. Chemical Geology, 56, 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(86)90004-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miyashiro, A. (1974) Volcanic Rocks Series in Island Arcs and Active Continental Margins. American Journal of Science, 274, 321-355. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.274.4.321</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngounouno, I., Déruelle, B., Guiraud, R., &amp; Vicat, J. P. (2001). Magmatismes tholéiitique et alcalin des demigrabens crétacés de Mayo Oulo-Léré et de Babouri-Figuil (Nord du Cameroun-Sud du Tchad) en domaine d’extension continentale. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences-Series IIA-Earth and Planetary Sciences, 333, 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1251-8050(01)01626-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nkouandou, O. F., Bardintzeff, J. M., Dourwe, P., Dogsaye, I., &amp; Fagny, M. A. (2016). Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Mafic Doleritic Dykes at Mbaoussi (Adamawa Plateau, Cameroon, Central Africa). Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, 8, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.9734/JGEESI/2016/28198</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nkouandou, O. F., Bardintzeff, J. M., Mahamat, O., Mefire, A. F., &amp; Ganwa, A. A. (2017). The Dolerites Dyke Swarm of Mongo, Guéra Massif (Chad, Central Africa): Geological Setting, Petrography and Geochemestry. Open Geosciences, 9, 138-150.https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2017-0012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nkouandou</surname><given-names> O. F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Bardintzeff</surname><given-names> J. M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mefire</surname><given-names> A. F.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Bardintzeff</surname><given-names> J. M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>. Petrology and Geochemistry of Doleritic Dyke of Likok (Cameroon, Central Africa)</article-title><source> Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences</source><volume> 10</volume>,<fpage> 121</fpage>-<lpage>132</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Pearce, J. A. (1982). Trace Elements Characteristics of Lavas from Destructive Plate Boundaries. In R. S. Thorpe, Ed., Andesite (pp. 525-548). John Wiley and Sons.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pearce, J. A., &amp; Norry, M. J. (1979). Petrogenetic Implications of Ti, Zr, Y and Nb Variations in Volcanic Rocks. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 69, 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375192</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rudnick, R. L., Gao, S., Holland, H. D., &amp; Turekian, K. K. (2003). Composition of the Continental Crust. Treatise on Geochemistry, 3, 1-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043751-6/03016-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwoerer, P. (1965). Carte géologique de reconnaissance à l’échelle du 1/500 000: Notice explicative sur la feuille Garoua-Est, Dir. Mines Géol. Impr. Nationale.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silpa, A. S., Satish-Kumar, M., &amp; Takahashi, T. (2021). Sr-Nd Isotopic Study of Dolerite Dykes in the Western Dharwar Craton, Southern India: Implications for the Evolution of the Subcontinental Lithospheric Mantle in Late Archean. Lithos, 388-389, Article ID: 106023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Srivastava, R. K. (2011). Dyke Swarms: Keys for Geodynamic Interpretation. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12496-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stephen, A. N. (2006) Structure of the Earth and the Origin of Magmas. Tulane University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Sun, S. S., &amp; McDonough, W. F. (1989). Chemical and Isotopic Systematics of Oceanic Basalts: Implications for the Mantle Composition and Processes. In: Saunders, A.D., Norry, M.J. IEds.), Magmatism in the Ocean Basins. Geological Society, London, Special Publication, 42, 313-345. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tchouankoué, J. P., Simeni Wambo, A. N., Kagou Dongmo, A., &amp; Worner, G. (2012). Petrology, Geochemistry, and Geodynamic Implications of Basaltic Dyke Swarms from the Southern Continental Part of the Cameroon Volcanic Line, Central Africa. The Open Geology Journal, 6, 72-84. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874262901206010072</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tchouankoué, J. P., Simeni Wambo, N. A., Kagou Dongmo, A., &amp; Li, X. H. (2014). 40Ar/39Ar Dating of Basaltic Dykes Swarm in Western Cameroon: Evidence of Late Paleozoic and Mesozoic Magmatism in the Corridor of the Cameroon Line. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 93, 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.01.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toteu, S. F. (1990). Geochemical Characterization of the Main Petrographical and Structural Units of Northern Cameroon, Implication for Pan-African Evolution. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 10, 615-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(90)90028-D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toteu, S. F., Michard, A., Bertrand, J. M., &amp; Rocci, G. (1987). U/Pb Dating of Precambrian Rocks from Northern Cameroon, Orogenic of the Pan-African Belt of Central Africa. Precambrian Research, 37, 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(87)90040-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vicat, J. P., Ngounouno, I., &amp; Pouclet, A. (2001). Existence de dykes doléritiques anciens à composition de tholéiites continentales au sein de la province alcaline de la ligne du Cameroun: Implication sur le contexte géodynamique. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences-Series IIA-Earth and Planetary Science, 332, 243-249.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1251-8050(01)01526-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wacrenier, P. (1952). Rapport de fin mission Garoua-La&amp;#239;. Direction des mines. A.E.F., 24 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, K., Plank, T., Walker, J. D., &amp; Smith, E. I. (2002). A Mantle Melting Profile across the Basin and Range, SW USA. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 107, ECV5-1-EVC5-21. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000209</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114303-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, Y., Chung, S. L., Jahn, B., &amp; Wu, G. (2001). Petrologic and Geochemical Constraints on the Petrogenesis of Permian-Triassic Emeishan Flood Basalts in South-western China. Lithos, 58, 145-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-4937(01)00055-X</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>