<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AID</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Infectious Diseases</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-2648</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aid.2021.114038</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AID-114123</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Knowledge of Health Workers in Public Health Centers of the Health District of Lom&#233; Commune on Dengue
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lidaw</surname><given-names>Deassoua Bawe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Akouda</surname><given-names>Akessiwe Patassi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Awereou</surname><given-names>Kotosso</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bawoubadi</surname><given-names>Abaltou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdou-Razak</surname><given-names>Moukaïla</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dosseh</surname><given-names>Dandogan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Majeste</surname><given-names>Ihou Wateba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Sylvanus Olympio Teaching Hospital, Lomé, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Army Hospital of Lomé, Lomé, Togo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>09</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>430</fpage><lpage>440</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Dengue is under-reported in the indicators and directories of health statistics in Togo and the diagnostic hypothesis of dengue during medical consultations is often not mentioned. 
  Objective: The objective is to assess healthcare workers’ knowledge of dengue and its management in public health centers in the health district of Lom&#233; Commune. 
  Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional and descriptive study that took place from November 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020 in the health district of Lom&#233; Commune. 
  Results: This study involved 280 healthcare workers out of 310 concerned, 
  <em>i.e.</em>, a participation rate of 90.32%, distributed over the 22 public health centers of the health district of Lom&#233; Commune. The age of the healthcare workers ranged from 18 to 58 years with an average age of 33 years (&#177;8.14). The age group [25 - 35 years] was more represented with 53.20%. Physicians were more represented with 46.07%. The majority of healthcare professionals were aware of the existence of dengue (90.36%). The essential clinical signs were more or less known, especially by the physicians. Dengue hemorrhagic fever was the most known clinical form and represented 70%. Treatment was symptomatic according to the majority (63.21%) and was based on analgesics (71.43%) and antipyretics (65%). The existence of a vaccine is not well known and represented 16.79%; the use of impregnated mosquito net is more cited as a secondary means of prevention, 77.86%. 
  Conclusion: Dengue is not well known by the health professionals involved in the survey. Nevertheless, physicians have a more or less good knowledge compared to paramedics. In practice, the diagnosis of dengue is often not mentioned.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Dengue</kwd><kwd> Knowledge</kwd><kwd> Healthcare Worker</kwd><kwd> Lom&#233; Commune</kwd><kwd> Togo</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Dengue or tropical influenza is currently the main arbovirus of the tropical regions surrounding the globe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref1">1</xref>] and is one of the neglected tropical diseases, constituting a major public health concern [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>Arboviruses are zoonotic diseases usually transmitted from vertebrate to vertebrate via a hematophagous arthropod, which is most often a mosquito or a tick [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref3">3</xref>]. A modeling estimates indicate that 390 million dengue virus infections occur annually, of which 96 million are clinically manifested (all severities) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref4">4</xref>]. Over the past two decades, the number of dengue cases reported to WHO has increased more than eightfold, from 505,430 cases in 2000 to 4.2 million cases in 2019 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref4">4</xref>]. Most infections are encountered in urban areas in tropical and subtropical regions, but imported dengue cases have been reported in non-tropical regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref5">5</xref>]. In Africa, the incidence of dengue is largely unknown due to poor surveillance and non-reporting of cases and epidemics to WHO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>In Togo, the first cases of dengue were reported between the years 1987 and 2000 in expatriate travelers after a stay in Togo without identification of the serotype involved [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref7">7</xref>]. In 2017, a few cases of dengue were identified and confirmed by the National Institute of Hygiene according to the Ministry of Health without any recorded deaths [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref8">8</xref>]. Two studies were conducted at the Sylvanus Olympio Teaching Hospital in 2017; one about 2 hospitalized cases of dengue hemorrhagic fever and the other concerned the search for NS1-Dengue antigen in febrile patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref10">10</xref>]. Dengue is under-reported or almost not reported in the indicators and directories of health statistics in Togo. Moreover, the diagnostic hypothesis of dengue during medical consultations is often not mentioned. It is in this perspective that the said study was initiated in order to evaluate the knowledge of healthcare staff on this plague in order to participate in its elimination.</p><p>The main objective of this study was to evaluate the knowledge of healthcare workers on dengue and its management in the public health centers of the health district of Lom&#233; commune.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>This is a descriptive and cross-sectional study from November 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020 concerning healthcare workers providing medical consultation in public health facilities in the health district of Lom&#233; Commune. It involved general practitioners and specialists, medical assistants, nurses, midwives and birth attendants practicing in the infectious diseases, medical emergencies, internal medicine, general medicine, maternity and pediatrics departments of the Teaching Hospitals, district hospitals and medico-social centers of the health district of Lom&#233; Commune.</p><p>The health district of Lom&#233; commune has five health districts composed of public, private and religious healthcare facilities. The public healthcare facilities are composed of 2 Teaching Hospitals (CHU), 1 Regional Hospital (CHR), 5 District Public Hospitals (HD), 13 Public Socio-Medical Centers (CMS) and 1 polyclinic.</p><p>All healthcare workers working in the public health facilities of the health district of Lom&#233; commune, who were present on the day of the survey and who agreed to participate in the study were included.</p><p>The sampling was exhaustive and the total number of healthcare workers who participated in the study was 280, excluding those on leave, healthcare workers on administrative leave and those not available.</p><p>The data were collected through an anonymous questionnaire with closed and open questions given to each healthcare worker and filled in immediately after an explanation of the study objectives. The variables studied were sociodemographic (age, sex, occupation, professional experience), epidemiological (causal agent and mode of transmission), clinical (clinical signs, clinical forms, complications and differential diagnosis), biological (referral and confirmatory biological tests for dengue) and therapeutic. For reliability and validity of the questionnaire, a pre-test was conducted on a small sample of healthcare workers in a health facility outside the study area.</p><p>The level of knowledge was judged as good, average or poor. Knowledge was good when the percentage of correct answers obtained was ≥80%; knowledge was average when the percentage of correct answers was between 50% and 79%, and poor when the percentage was &lt;50%.</p><p>The Chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>) test was the primary statistical test used for categorical variables of interest at the 95% significance level. The significance level was set at 5%.</p><p>Participation in the study required informed verbal consent and did not require any compensation since the voluntary nature of the study was emphasized. The directors of the various health districts were informed by a request through the hierarchy and gave their agreement by memos to the various healthcare facilities to be surveyed in their health area.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The participation rate was 90.32%, i.e., 280 healthcare workers surveyed out of 310 in 22 public health facilities in the health district of Lom&#233; Commune.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Socio-Professional Characteristics</title><p>The median age was 30 years (&#177;12) and the age group [25 - 45 years] represented 74.60%. Medical staff (physicians and medical assistants) were in the majority as was professional experience ranging from 0 to 10 years for most (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. General Knowledge about Dengue</title><p>v Knowledge about the existence of dengue, the causative agent and the means of transmission</p><p>Dengue was known by the majority of healthcare workers (90.36%). Medical school training and media information were the most cited sources of knowledge about dengue. More than half of the healthcare workers (54.29%) knew that dengue is caused by a virus and 81.79% also knew the means of transmission due to mosquito bite. There was a significant difference in the knowledge of the existence, causative agent and mode of transmission of dengue among the different professional categories (p &lt; 0.001). Physicians are more familiar with the existence of the disease and its causative agent and mode of transmission than paramedics (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>v Knowledge about clinical signs</p><p>Headache (80.36%), fever (80.00%), arthralgia (63.57%), myalgia (61.07%), hemorrhagic manifestations (50.71%) were the clinical signs most cited by the healthcare workers with a significant difference (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>v Knowledge about clinical forms</p><p>Dengue hemorrhagic fever was mentioned in 70.00% of cases, followed by classical dengue (61.43%). And dengue with shock syndrome (41.43%), there was a significant difference in knowledge about clinical forms (p &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of healthcare workers in public health centers in the health district of Lom&#233; Commune according to socio-professional characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number (n)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤25 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[26 - 45 years]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >209</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[46 - 60 years]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >professionnal Category</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >General Practitioner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Specialist</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical Assistant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nurse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife/Birth Attendant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Work Experience</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[0 - 10 years]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[11 - 20 years]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of healthcare workers in the public health centers of the health district of Lom&#233; Commune according to their knowledge of the existence of dengue, the causal agent and the mode of transmission</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Awareness of the existence of dengue</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Physician</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129 (100.00%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00 (0.00%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical Assistant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 (94.29%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02 (05.71%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nurse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (88.89%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05 (11.11%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife/Birth Attendant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 (71.83%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (28.17%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >253 (90.36%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (09.64%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Knowledge about the causative agent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good answer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bad answer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Physician</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89 (68.99%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (31.01%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical Assistant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (57.14%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (42.86%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nurse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (48.89%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (51.11%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife/Birth Attendant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (29.58%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 (70.42%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152 (54.29%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128 (45.71%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Knowledge about the means of transmission</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good answer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bad answer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Physician</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123 (95.35%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06 (04.65%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical Assistant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (88.57%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (45.32%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nurse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (77.78%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (22.22%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife/Birth Attendant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (56.34%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (43.66%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >229 (81.79%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 (18.21%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of healthcare workers in public health centers in the health district of Lom&#233; Commune according to their knowledge about the clinical signs of dengue</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Headache</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fever</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Arthralgia</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Myalgia</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nausea and vomiting</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hemorrhagic manifestation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Skin rash</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Low Back Pain</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Don’t know</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Physician</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123 (95.35%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124 (96.12%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112 (86.82%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99 (7674%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84 (65.12%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99 (76.74%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90 (69.77%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (27.13%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06 04.65%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical Assistant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (82.86%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (82.86%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (68.57%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (71.43%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (48.57%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (48.57%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (45.71%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06 (17.14%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09 (25.71%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nurse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (75.56%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (77.78%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (48.89%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (55.56%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (51.11%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (35.56%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (35.56%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (28.89%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (36.56%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midw/BA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (55.00%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (50.70%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (28.17%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (31.00%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (26.76%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (22.53%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (22.53%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (14.08%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (56.34%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >225 (80.36%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224 (80.00%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >178 (63.57%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171 (61.07%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143 (51.07%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138 (49.29%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138 (49.29%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64 (22.86%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71 (25.36%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.056</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Midw = midwife; BA = Birth Attendant.</p><p>v Knowledge of confirmatory biological tests</p><p>Over the 280 healthcare workers, 205 (73.21%) were aware that the confirmatory diagnosis of dengue is provided by RT-PCR and serology with higher rates among medical staff (Physicians and medical assistants, n = 164) or 90.24% (n = 148). There was a significant difference in knowledge of confirmatory biological tests (p &lt; 0.001).</p><p>v Knowledge about dengue treatment</p><p>Medical staff knew that treatment of dengue is symptomatic in the majority of cases. There was a significant difference in knowledge about the type of treatment (p &lt; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>Analgesics (71.43%), antipyretics (65%) and bed rest (48.21%) were the most cited means of symptomatic treatment with a significant difference in knowledge of analgesics and antipyretics (p &lt; 0.05).</p><p>v Knowledge of dengue prevention</p><p>The existence of a vaccine against dengue was known by only 16.79% of the healthcare workers.</p><p>Other means of dengue prevention were well known in the majority of cases with a significant difference (p &lt; 0.05): sleeping under a mosquito net (77.86%); destruction of larval breeding sites (73.21%); use of repellent cream (57.50%).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Socio-Professional Characteristics</title><p>Healthcare professionals in Togo are relatively young as shown by the median age and their work experience of this study. This finding was made in Tanzania where a similar study conducted on the issue found that the majority of healthcare professionals (n = 86) were between 25 and 40 years old (48%) with work experience ranging from 0 to 10 years for most (n = 62) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref11">11</xref>]. The predominance of paramedics was also noted in Burkina Faso (89% nurses) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref12">12</xref>] and Tanzania (75.3% nurses) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref11">11</xref>]. Paramedics still make up the majority of the health workers in Togo for several reasons. The country has several training schools for medical assistants and midwives. In addition, in peripheral health facilities outside hospitals, paramedics are the first actors who play the role of physician.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of healthcare workers in public health centers in the health district of Lom&#233; Commune according to knowledge about the type of dengue treatment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Symptomatic treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Curative treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Symptomatic and curative Treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Don’t know</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Physician</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112 (86.82%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03 (02.33%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05 (03.88%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09 (06.98%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical Assistant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (71.43%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00 (00.00%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06 (17.14%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04 (11.43%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nurse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (48.89%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01 (02.22%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09 (20.00%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (28.89%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midw/BA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (25.35%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (5.63%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (19.72%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (49.30%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177 (63.21%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08 (02.86%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (12.14%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61 (21.79%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Midw = midwife; BA = Birth Attendant.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. General Knowledge about Dengue</title><p>Dengue is known to most healthcare workers as a viral infectious disease and its means of transmission; however, the causal agent, which is a virus, was not well known among physicians. Sondo et al. in Burkina Faso had reported a high proportion of knowledge of dengue but 62.50% for knowledge about the causal agent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref12">12</xref>]. In Tanzania, according to Kajeguka et al. the majority of healthcare professionals knew about dengue through the media [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref11">11</xref>]. The fact that malaria and dengue are transmitted by mosquito bite may be confusing for some who are unaware that dengue is caused by a virus. The level of knowledge is not the same among all caregivers. Physicians had a much higher level of knowledge than other socio-professional categories with a significant difference (p &lt; 0.05). The level of study of physicians is in favor of their better knowledge of the disease, especially since the teaching modules are not the same with paramedics.</p><p>The clinical signs of dengue were well known among physicians and medical assistants who have better knowledge because they are the ones who often provide consultations in healthcare facilities. A few years ago, a study on the detection of dengue in consultations conducted by the National Institute of Hygiene in certain health centers in the city of Lom&#233; also enabled this good knowledge of clinical signs similar to malaria. Dengue hemorrhagic fever is the most frequently cited clinical form and this is also explained by the fact that dengue is known by most healthcare professionals as viral hemorrhagic fever.</p><p>Confirmatory tests for dengue such as molecular biology and serology are better known in Burkina Faso (71.10%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref12">12</xref>] and Guadeloupe (75%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref13">13</xref>]. Medical staff (especially physicians) are more familiar with these additional confirmatory examinations compared to other professional categories, thanks to the teaching of this pathology at the faculty of medicine. The rates are higher in Sondo et al. in Burkina Faso (71.10%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref12">12</xref>] and in H&#233;l&#232;ne-P&#233;lage et al. in Guadeloupe (75%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref13">13</xref>]. Molecular biology is indeed a new or difficult term for paramedics to understand, especially if it was never covered during their training. In reality, paramedics, especially nurses, are trained to provide nursing care and midwives are trained to monitor pregnancy, delivery and post-partum. They are not trained to diagnose pathologies like my doctors. It is the lack of doctors that causes some paramedics to substitute for doctors in some health facilities.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Knowledge of Dengue Treatment and Prevention</title><p>It is well known among healthcare providers that most viral diseases such as dengue are managed symptomatically, which explains the high use of analgesics/antipyretics (81.3%) in a study in Burkina Faso [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref12">12</xref>]. This high level of use is explained by the fact that signs such as fever, headaches, aches and pains and diffuse pain are in the foreground; in addition, analgesics and antipyretics are widely used in the treatment of febrile diseases. In general, anti-inflammatory drugs were less used and the avoidance of Aspirin and Ibuprofen were mentioned in Guadeloupe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref13">13</xref>]. This proves that the majority of caregivers are aware that anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of aggravating the inflammatory reaction in viral pathologies and should be avoided as much as possible.</p><p>In terms of prevention, the existence of a vaccine against dengue is not well known among healthcare workers, because the vaccine is not widely used and because of its recent development. As the means of transmission of dengue is similar to that of malaria, other means of prevention have been well reported in our series and in Burkina Faso in high proportions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114123-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>The limitations of this study are that the administration of the questionnaire was not straightforward because of the workload. This situation required the interviewer to distribute the questionnaire to staff and return on another day to collect the completed questionnaire. This certainly allowed some of the respondents to go and get the answers to the questions. As a result, the actual assessment of knowledge may be biased.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>Dengue is the most common arbovirus in the world and is considered by the World Health Organization to be an emerging disease in urban areas of tropical and subtropical regions.</p><p>This study reveals that healthcare workers in public health centers in the health district of Lom&#233; Commune do not have good knowledge of dengue. However, this knowledge is better among physicians than among other socio-professional categories. In practice, the diagnosis or assumption of dengue is often not made, considering that dengue is relatively rare due to the absence of an epidemic in the country. Malaria is over-treated in cases of fever and cases of classical dengue would be treated as malaria. However, caution is required to diagnose severe dengue cases early and to identify outbreaks.</p><p>At the end of this study, we suggest the recommendation to the nursing staff to think of dengue during medical consultations or in case of febrile episode and especially to ask for complementary examination for its confirmation.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Bawe, L.D., Patassi, A.A., Kotosso, A., Abaltou, B., Mouka&#239;la, A.-R., Dandogan, D. and Wateba, M.I. (2021) Knowledge of Health Workers in Public Health Centers of the Health District of Lom&#233; Commune on Dengue. Advances in Infectious Diseases, 11, 430-440. https://doi.org/10.4236/aid.2021.114038</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Appendix</title><p>Knowledge of healthcare workers on the management of dengue in the health district of</p><p>Lom&#233; commune (Togo)</p><p>Survey form</p><p>I. Socio-professional characteristics</p><p>1. Age: / _ /</p><p>2. Sex: / _ /</p><p>3. Occupation: Physician / _ / Physician’s Assistant /_ / Nurse / _ / Midwife / _ / Birth attendant / _ / If Physician: Specialist / _ / General Practitioner /</p><p>4. Year of service: / _ /</p><p>5. Workplace: CHU / _ / CHR / _ / DISTRICT HOSPITAL / _ / CMS / _ / USP /_ /</p><p>II. General knowledge of dengue</p><p>5. Have you ever heard of dengue fever? Yes / _ / No / _ /</p><p>If Yes Media / _ / Medical schools / _ / Training institute / _ / Workplace / _ / From a colleague / _ /</p><p>6. What is the causative agent of dengue fever?</p><p>Don’t know / _ / Parasite / _ / Fungus / _ / Bacteria / _ / Virus / _ /</p><p>7. What is the mode of transmission of dengue fever?</p><p>Mosquito bite / _ / Sexual intercourse / _ / Dirty hands /_ / Oral / _ / Flies / _ / Don’t know /_ /</p><p>8. Name the clinical signs of dengue</p><p>Headache / _ / Retro-orbital pain / _ / Abdominal pain / _ / Myalgias / _ / Arthralgias / _ / Skin rash / _ / Shock syndrome / _ / Bleeding manifestations / _ / fever / _ / nausea / _ / vomiting / _ / don’t know / _ /</p><p>9. Name the clinical forms of dengue</p><p>Classic dengue / _ / Hemorrhagic dengue / _ / Dengue with shock syndrome / _ / Don’t know / _ /</p><p>10. Name the biological tests used to diagnose dengue fever</p><p>Dengue serology / _ / RT-PCR Dengue / _ /Blood Test / _ / CBC / _ / Transaminases / _ / CRP / _ / Blood culture / _ / PT / _ / SV / _ / Don’t know / _ /</p><p>11. Confirmatory biological tests for dengue: Serology / _ / RT-PCR / _ / Don’t know / _ /</p><p>12. Name the complications of dengue fever: Hemorrhage / _ / Shock syndrome / _ / Cardiovascular collapse / _ / Death / _ / Don’t know / _ /</p><p>13. Differential diagnosis</p><p>What diseases should not be confused with dengue fever?</p><p>Malaria / _ / Typhoid fever / _ / Yellow fever / _ / Meningitis / _ / Ebola / _ / Sepsis / _ / Leptospirosis / _ / Influenza / _ / Chikungunya / _ / Zika / _ / Eruptive fevers / _ / Infectious mononucleosis / _ / Cytomegalovirus / _ / Other hemorrhagic fevers / _ / Don’t know / _ / Other: .........................................................</p><p>14. Is the treatment for dengue fever Symptomatic / _ / Curative / _ / Symptomatic and Curative / _ / ?</p><p>15. Name the means of treatment for dengue fever</p><p>Anti-inflammatory / _ / Antibiotic / _ / Analgesic / _ /</p><p>Antihistamines / _ / Bed rest / _ / Antiviral / _ / Blood transfusion / _ / Plenty of fluids / _ / Anti-malarial /_ / Antipyretic / _ / Don’t know / _ /</p><p>16. How to prevent dengue fever?</p><p>Sleeping under mosquito net / _ / Use repellent creams / _ / / _ / Vaccination / _ / Destruction of mosquito breeding grounds / _ / Don’t know / _ /</p><p>Others: .............................................................................................................................</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.114123-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diallo, I., Sondo, K.A., Tieno, H., Tamelokpo, E.Y., Zoungrana, J., Diendéré, E.A., et al. (2017) à propos de 98 cas de dengue hospitalisés dans une clinique privée de Ouagadougou: aspects épidémiologiques, diagnostiques et évolutifs. Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie Exotique, 110, 291-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13149-017-0585-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114123-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">CMIT (2012) Arbovirose. In: Pilly, E., Ed., Maladies Infectieuses et tropicales, Collège des Universitaires de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Paris, 418-419.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114123-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (2009) Dengue Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control: New Edition. World Health Organization, Geneva, 147 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114123-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Organisation Mondiale de la Santé (2020) Dengue et dengue sévère. Organisation Mondiale de la Santé, Genève.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114123-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faye, O., Ba, Y., Faye, O., Talla, C., Diallo, D., Mondo, M., et al. (2014) Urban Epidemic of Dengue Virus Serotype 3 Infection, Senegal, 2009. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 20, 456-459. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2003.121885</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114123-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gubler, D.J. and Kuno, G. (1997) Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. CAB International, New York, 477 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114123-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amarasinghe, A., Kuritsk, J.N., Letson, G.W. and Margolis, H.S. (2011) Dengue Virus Infection in Africa. Emerging Infectious Disease, 17, 1349-1354. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1708.101515</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114123-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministère de la Santé et de la Protection Sociale (2017) Apparition de la dengue: le ministre de la santé rassure les populations. Portail officiel de la République togolaise.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114123-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salou, M., Zida-Compaoré, W.I.K., Gbéassor-Komlanvi, F.A., Folly-Gbogboè, M., Konou, A.A., Dossim, S., Mama, Z., Douffan, M., Ekouévi, D.K. and Dagnra, A.Y. (2021) Prévalence de la dengue chez les patients présentant un syndrome fébrile au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire SylvanusOlympio de Lomé (Togo) en 2017. MTSI, 1, No. 4. https://doi.org/10.48327/mtsi.2021.183</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114123-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Watéba, I.M., Bawé, L.D., Patassi, A.A., Kotosso, A., Balaka, A., Abaltou, B., et al. (2018) Dengue hémorragique: à propos de 2 cas observés dans le service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales du CHU Sylvanus Olympio, Lomé (Togo). Revue Tunisienne d’Infectiologie, 12, 1-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114123-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kajeguka, D.C., Desrochers, R.E., Mwangi, R., Mgabo, M.R., Alifrangis, M., Kavishe, R.A., Mosha, F.W. and Kulkarni, M.A. (2017) Knowledge and Practice Regarding Dengue and Chikungunya: A Cross-Sectional Study among Healthcare Workers and Community in Northern Tanzania. Tropical Medicine and International Health 22, 583-593. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12863</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114123-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sondo, K.A., Diendéré, E.A., Diallo, I., Zoungrana, J., Poda, A., Sawadogo, M., et al. (2018) Connaissance des agents de santé sur la prise en charge de la dengue à Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). Journal de la Recherche Scientifique de l'Université de Lomé, 41, 17-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114123-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hélène-Pélage, J. and Zami-Rinaldo, F. (2005) Connaissances et attitudes pratiques des médecins généralistes guadeloupéens: à propos des dengues sévères. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses, 35, S67-S68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-077X(05)80884-4</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>