In Japan, the total allowable catch (TAC) is determined based on the results of simulations that are conducted assuming the future values of reproductive success (RPS) and by setting several options that determine the reduced rate for the current fishing mortality coefficient, F. The future values of the spawning stock biomass (SSB) and catch are then calculated [1] . In general, however, the average past RPS values are used for the simulation, because the future RPS values are not known. However, this procedure has a serious problem when the future RPS value is lower than the average. Estimating the future values of RPS will thus provide useful information for fishery resource management.

Sakuramoto [2] showed that the RPS of 12 stocks around Japan could be reproduced using only environmental factors. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate a case in which the future values of RPS can be forecast using the method that Sakuramoto showed [2] - [8] .

The data for the stocks used in this study were provided by the Fisheries Agency and Fisheries Research Agency of Japan [1] . The environmental factors used in this study were the monthly index of the Arctic oscillation (AO) [9] and the monthly index of the Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO). However, the PDO data that Sakuramoto used [2] were not the newest version. In the present study, the PDO data were replaced by the newest version. [10] The PDO data that were selected here to reproduce the RPS are thus different from those of Sakuramoto [2] .

The model that reproduces the RPS herein is essentially the same as that described by Sakuramoto [2] .

The model used in this paper is as follows:

R P S t = exp ( a 0 + a 1 A O t − 4 , 7 + a 2 A O t − 6 , 3 + a 3 P D O t − 3 , 3 + a 4 P D O t − 3 , 4     + a 5 P D O t − 3 , 7 + a 6 P D O t − 5 , 12 )

where RPS_t denotes the reproductive success in year t, AO_t−i,m represents the AO in month m of year t − i, and PDO_t−k,m is the PDO in month m of year t − k. a_i are the partial regression coefficients, the estimated values of which are: a₀ = −1.01640, a₁ = 0.37528, a₂ = 0.14709, a₃ = 0.15714, a₄ = −0.31603, a₅ = −0.10595, and a₆ = −0.08927.

Figure 1 shows the observed and reproduced RPS values (see Appendix). The entire tendency is well reproduced. Further, the RPS abruptly decreased in 2018 and 2019, and these sudden and rapid decreases were well reproduced with the model. This indicates that the model proposed here is reasonable.

At this time (September 2021), the values of RPS and SSB are published from 1999 to 2019 [1] . As mentioned above, the environmental data up to July in year t − 3 are necessary to calculate the RPS in year t. As of September 2021, the AO and PDO data are available up until August 2021 [9] [10] . Therefore, the future values of RPS until 2024 can be reproduced.

The top of Figure 2 shows the forecasted RPS from 2020 to 2024. The RPS value recovered in 2020 and became significantly high in 2021. The average RPS value for the period from 2020 to 2024 is 0.370, which is not significantly different from 0.361, which is the average RPS from 1999 to 2019.

The middle of Figure 2 shows the trajectories of the AO in July of year t − 4 and March of year t − 6, that were used to reproduce the RPS. The bottom of Figure 2 shows the trajectories of PDO in March, April and July of year t − 3, and December of year t − 5 that were used to reproduce the RPS.

The RPS was high around 2003 and 2014, and it was low around 2008 and 2019. The AO was high around 2003 and 2014 and low around 2007 and 2019. The PDO was low around 2003 and 2014 and high around 2007 and 2019. It can thus be said that the RPS has a positive correlation with the AO and a negative correlation with the PDO. Regarding future values of RPS, the AO values in September 2017 and March 2015 (which are plotted at 2021 in the x-axis of the middle of Figure 2) were both high, and the PDO data in March, April and July of 2018, and December 2016 (which are plotted at 2021 in the x-axis of the bottom of Figure 2) were low. This is the reason why the forecasted value of RPS in 2021 was evaluated as high.

The results of this study demonstrate that the RPS can be reproduced using only the AO and PDO indexes by month. As shown in Figure 2, the RPS has a positive correlation with the AO and a negative correlation with the PDO. The case of the Pacific stock of Splendid alfonsino is a special case because their life span is very long; their maximum age is 26 years, and their maturity age is also high. Approximately 50% of 4-year-old Splendid alfonsino are mature, and 100% of the ≥5-year-old and older fish are mature. The approach described herein can therefore not be adopted to many other stocks of fish in which the life span and maturity age are short. However, if the target species has similar features, it is worthwhile to try to use this approach to forecast future values of RPS to reduce the uncertainty of the species’ management.

I thank anonymous reviewers for their useful comments that improved this manuscript.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Sakuramoto, K. (2021) A Model That Forecasts Future Values of Reproductive Success for the Pacific Stock of Splendid Alfonsino. Open Access Library Journal, 8: e8213. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108213

Model used is:

R P S t = exp ( a 0 + a 1 ∗ A O t − 4 , 7 + a 2 ∗ A O t − 6 , 3 + a 3 ∗ P D O t − 3 , 3 + a 4 ∗ P D O t − 3 , 4                     + a 5 ∗ P D O t − 3 , 7 + a 6 ∗ P D O t − 5 , 12 )