<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Environmental Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-2197</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2021.1212070</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEP-114035</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Trace Elements in Mollusks, Crustaceans and Fish Commonly Consumed by the Catfish &lt;i&gt;Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus&lt;/i&gt; Lac&#233;p&#232;de, 1803 from the Lake Togo-Lagoon of An&#233;ho Hydrosystem (Southern Togo)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kamilou</surname><given-names>Ouro-Sama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Komlan</surname><given-names>Mawuli Afiademanyo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hodabalo</surname><given-names>Dheoulaba Solitoke</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gnon</surname><given-names>Tanouayi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tchaa</surname><given-names>Esso-Essinam Badassan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koudjo</surname><given-names>Adje</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koudjo</surname><given-names>Adje</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sadikou</surname><given-names>Agbere</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kissao</surname><given-names>Gnandi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Gestion, Traitement et Valorisation des Déchets, Département de Géologie et Environnement, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Lomé, Lomé, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratoire d’Ecologie Animale et d’Ecotoxicologie, Département de Zoologie et Biologie Animale, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Lomé, Lomé, Togo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1185</fpage><lpage>1203</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>15,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The omnivorous fish species, 
  C. nigrodigitatus feeds mainly on benthic organisms and may therefore consume contaminated food throughout its food web. This can lead to the bioaccumulation of contaminants such as trace elements in their tissues. However, fish consumption is a major pathway of human exposure to contaminants which may cause public health problems. The aim of the present study is to assess trace elements contamination in some species from the food web of 
  C. nigrodigitatus. For this, 10 main food items of the silver catfish were collected at two sites from February to July 2017 and analyzed using an Atomic Absorption Spectrometer coupled with a hydride and cold vapour generator. The concentrations of trace elements varied greatly from one species to another and within each species. These values ranged from 0.007 mg/kg for Hg in C hippos to 354.84 mg/kg for Mn in 
  P. fusca. The most contaminated species by trace elements were benthic organisms: 
  M. perna (Cd, Pb, Hg), 
  Pagurus sp. (Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn), 
  G. paradoxa (As) and 
  P. fusca (Mn). The average concentrations of trace elements found in species were, for the most part, above WHO standards except Hg in 
  M. perna and 
  G. paradoxa. The water-based bioconcentration factors (BCFw) reach 92.58 for Cd, 44.72 for Pb, 382.49 for Hg and 1514.34 for As in 
  M. perna. It is therefore necessary to pay particular attention to this ecosystem and to put in place a better management plan.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;/i&gt;C. nigrodigitatus&lt;/i&gt; Preys</kwd><kwd> Trace Elements</kwd><kwd> Contamination</kwd><kwd> Lake Togo</kwd><kwd> An&#233;ho Lagoon</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Most parts of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems are now affected in one way or another by anthropogenic activities such as the rapid industrialization and demographic pressure during the last decades which lead to continental and aquatic ecosystems contamination by trace elements. Indeed, in aquatic environments, significant amounts of trace elements are introduced by industries, mining, fossil fuel combustion, run-off from agricultural lands, house hold sewages, atmospheric deposition and rocks weathering. These metals pose high environmental risks due to their longtime persistence in nature and possible bioaccumulation and biomagnification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref6">6</xref>]. These inputs have greatly altered the biogeochemical cycles of trace metals and enhanced their bioavailability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref7">7</xref>]. Consequently, it follows permanent disturbances in aquatic ecosystems leading to environmental and ecological degradation and which constitute a potential risk to a number of flora and fauna species, including human through food web [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>Aquatic organisms have been reported to contain higher concentrations of trace element in their tissues compared to the levels in the surrounding environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref11">11</xref>]. Coastal aquatic ecosystems are of considerable ecological and socio-economic importance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref12">12</xref>]. They are the habitats and nurseries for many larval and juvenile stages of fish species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref14">14</xref>]. Thus, trace element contamination of these ecosystems includes that of the fish food web species presenting a serious public health issue because these fish are finally consumed by humans.</p><p>The Silver Catfish C. nigrodigitatus from the Lake Togo-Lagoon of An&#233;ho hydrosystem is highly appreciated as protein source by local populations and contributes to their socio-economic well-being [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref16">16</xref>]. It is well established that this hydrosystem and its basin includes the most contaminated coastal areas in Togo. Several workers reported the presence of harmful pollutants in waters, soils, sediments, biota and vegetables from the basin mainly due to phosphorites mining in the region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref21">21</xref>]. The Silver catfish which is known to be omnivorous feeding mainly on benthic organisms may therefore consume contaminated food throughout its food web. This can lead to the bioaccumulation of contaminants such as trace elements in its tissues. Knowing that fish consumption is the major pathway of human exposure to contaminants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref22">22</xref>], human health may be highly threatened. The aim of the present study is to assess trace element contamination levels in some species from the food items of C. nigrodigitatus.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The study area is represented by the Lake Togo-Lagoon of An&#233;ho hydrosystem (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). It is a continuous body of water along the Togolese coast between the phosphorite mining area in the North and the phosphorite processing plant on the beach in the south. It is located between the North latitudes (6˚17'37''; 6˚14'38'') and the East longitudes (1˚23'33''; 1˚37'38'') and is composed of three lagoons: Lake Togo (46 km<sup>2</sup>), between the village of D&#233;kpo in the North and Agbodrafo in the South, is 13 km long in its largest diagonal (NW-SE) and 6 km in its smaller diagonal (NE-SW), the Togoville lagoon (13 km long and 150 to 900 m wide) which is parallel to the coast between the villages of Togoville and Zaliv&#233; and the An&#233;ho lagoon which is a network of narrow channels from Zaliv&#233; to its mouth at An&#233;ho [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref23">23</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sampling and Laboratory Analysis</title><p>Based on the work of Ouro-Sama et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref24">24</xref>], the main species composing the diet of C. nigrodigitatus in the Lake Togo-Lagoon of An&#233;ho hydrosystem were collected from two sites during the months of February to July 2017 in collaboration</p><p>with fishermen from the lagoon complex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref25">25</xref>]. The samples were wrapped in batches of species in sterile polyethylene bags and placed in coolers in the presence of a refrigerating equipment and then transported to the laboratory where they were stored at −20˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref26">26</xref>]. Due to their small size, five batches of composite samples of 4 to 10 individuals for each species were carried out according to Pascal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref27">27</xref>] (the smallest making at least 75% of the largest). After identification, the samples were dried at 65˚C in an oven, finely ground in an agate mortar. The grinding equipment has always been cleaned before and after each sample. These samples were then digested using a mixture of reagents composed of 30% hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) and 67% nitric acid (HNO<sub>3</sub>) in the proportions of 1 H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>: 3 HNO<sub>3</sub> at 90˚C on a hot plate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref32">32</xref>]. For the determination of mercury, the samples were digested at room temperature for 72 - 96 hours while stirring them regularly in order to allow good attack by the reagents. Simultaneously, the blanks were prepared and processed under the same conditions as the two series of samples. Then, each solution from the digestion was filtered, completed to 20 ml with distilled water and stored at room temperature. Trace elements were determined in these solutions, by atomic absorption spectrometer (AAS) with flame (Thermo Electron S. Series type), for Cd, Pb, Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mn and by the same AAS coupled to a hydride and cold vapour generator (Thermo Scientific VP100 type), with flame for As and without flame for Hg. The reagents used for this purpose are analytical grade from Sigma-Aldrich for H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and HNO<sub>3</sub> and from SCPScience for trace element standards.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Accuracy and Quality Control</title><p>The quality of the analytical methods has been verified by internal control. A procedural blank was prepared with the same reagents and the same experimental conditions as the main samples. The blank allowed zeroing the device and was analyzed after each 10 samples batch during the analysis. This allowed to determine possible contaminations and eliminate the quantization errors. The standard solutions prepared for each trace element were also analyzed at regular intervals in order to verify the accuracy of the results. In addition, the repeatability of the results was checked by the analysis of duplicates which were randomly incorporated among the samples.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Bioconcentration Factors of Trace Elements</title><p>In order to assess the level of transfer of trace elements from the medium to the organism, bioconcentration factors (BCF) were calculated in relation to both water and sediment. These BCF are expressed according to the following equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref34">34</xref>].</p><p>BCF = C tissue C water / sediment</p><p>where C tissue is the concentration of the trace element in the tissue and C water / sediment is the concentration of the same trace element in water or sediment. Trace element concentrations in waters and sediments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) used for the calculations were from simultaneous studies in the same hydrosystem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref5">5</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The analysis of variances (ANOVA) followed by the Newman-Keuls test made it possible to evaluate the interspecies variations in trace element contamination of the prey species of C. nigrodigitatus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref31">31</xref>]. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was carried out to assess the typology of trace element contamination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref37">37</xref>]. Pearson’s correlation analysis demonstrated the links between trace elements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref34">34</xref>]. These analyses were performed using the STATISTICA 6.1 software.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Bioaccumulation of Trace Elements in C. nigrodigitatus’ Preys</title><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Trace Element Contents in C. nigrodigitatus’ Preys</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> indicates that all trace elements are highly concentrated by the species studied except Hg. In addition, it is generally noted that the lowest levels of trace elements were recorded at the level of fish species. Cadmium (Cd) concentrations ranged from 0.04 mg/kg obtained in Tilapia zillii to 3.98 mg/kg in Callinectes amnicola. The Pb contents of the preys are between 0.02 mg/kg observed in C. amnicola and 7.42 mg/kg found in Mytilus perna. The lowest Cr content (0.02 mg/kg) is obtained in T. zillii while the highest content (5.17 mg/kg) is recorded in Pagurus sp. The crustacean species Farfantepenaeus notialis has the lowest Ni content (0.27 mg/kg) while the highest is recorded in the hermit crab Pagurus sp. with a value of 42.44 mg/kg. As for Cu contents, they vary from 0.25 mg/kg in T. zillii to 78.25 mg/kg obtained in F. notialis. The Hg contents vary from 0.006 mg/kg recorded in Caranx hippos to 0.183 mg/kg in M. perna. The As contents vary between 0.18 mg/kg in T. zillii and 4.66 mg/kg observed in Galatea paradoxa. The species with the lowest Zn content (4.47 mg/kg) was T. zillii and the highest Zn content was obtained from Pagurus sp. (152.60 mg/kg). Mn concentrations, are between 0.78 mg/kg in T. zillii and 494.16 mg/kg in Pachymelania fusca. The levels of trace elements in these species are generally above WHO standards for consumption with the exception of Hg concentrations which are above standards only in G. paradoxa and M. perna.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Trace elements in waters and sediments from the hydrosystem</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >As</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="10"  >Waters (&#181;g/l)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry season</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >216.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >197.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rainy season</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >348.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >396.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="10"  >Sediments (mg/kg)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry season</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >766.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rainy season</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >910.08</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Statistical values of the trace element contents of C. nigrodigitatus’ preys</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Concentrations of trace elements (mg/kg)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >F. notialis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08 - 0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04 - 0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07 - 0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27 - 5.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.54 - 78.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008 - 0.013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48 - 0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.01 - 48.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.90 - 42.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32 &#177; 0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13 &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 &#177; 0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72 &#177; 2.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.05 &#177; 26.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53 &#177; 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.14 &#177; 15.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.10 &#177; 14.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >C. amnicola</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84 - 3.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02 - 0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83 - 1.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86 - 1.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.01 - 71.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011 - 0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44 - 0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.38 - 75.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.88 - 189.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.41 &#177; 0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34 &#177; 0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19 &#177; 0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37 &#177; 0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.32 &#177; 13.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.12 &#177; 3.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >166.24 &#177; 27.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >E. melanopterus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06 - 0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06 - 0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41 - 0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84 - 0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45 - 3.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011 - 0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49 - 0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.35 - 71.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.78 - 76.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13 &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 &#177; 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56 &#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90 &#177; 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.81 &#177; 0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.020 &#177; 0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.92 &#177; 5.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.39 &#177; 11.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >E. fimbriata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10 - 0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29 - 0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 - 0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69 - 1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10 - 5.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023 - 0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62 - 0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.98 - 72.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.95 - 60.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21 &#177; 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48 &#177; 0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34 &#177; 0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98 &#177; 0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.49 &#177; 1.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68 &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.80 &#177; 6.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.22 &#177; 8.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >C. hippos</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08 - 0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30 - 1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09 - 0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51 - 0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31 - 2.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006 - 0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02 - 1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.96 - 64.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57 - 13.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69 &#177; 0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18 &#177; 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67 &#177; 0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55 &#177; 0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30 &#177; 0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.10 &#177; 21.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.15 &#177; 4.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P. fusca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.28 - 1.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57 - 1.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.43 - 4.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36 - 5.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.03 - 51.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013 - 0.029</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55 - 0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.58 - 54.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283.3 - 494.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47 &#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82 &#177; 0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.52 &#177; 1.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.43 &#177; 1.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.24 &#177; 2.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018 &#177; 0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62 &#177; 0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.38 &#177; 3.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >354.84 &#177; 84.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >M. perna</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58 - 3.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.18 - 7.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29 - 4.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.48 - 14.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.78 - 27.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.064 - 0.183</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.50 - 4.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.05 - 130.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.90 - 119.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96 &#177; 0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.33 &#177; 1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.77 &#177; 1.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.38 &#177; 3.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.46 &#177; 2.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.146 &#177; 0.048</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.72 &#177; 0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.65 &#177; 14.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.29 &#177; 18.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Pagurus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64 - 1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14 - 3.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.27 - 5.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.23 - 42.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.28 - 143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014 - 0.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79 - 2.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.25 - 152.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >193.2 - 216.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98 &#177; 0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83 &#177; 0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90 &#177; 0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.82 &#177; 5.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137.41 &#177; 6.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.020 &#177; 0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.15 &#177; 0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137.80 &#177; 9.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >206.33 &#177; 9.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >G. paradoxa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87 - 3.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82 - 6.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85 - 3.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.04 - 6.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.30 - 22.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.056 - 0.095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96 - 4.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.34 - 102.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.17 - 150.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83 &#177; 0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.07 &#177; 1.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.76 &#177; 0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.27 &#177; 0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.54 &#177; 2.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.081 &#177; 0.015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75 &#177; 0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.55 &#177; 16.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.18 &#177; 35.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >T. zillii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04 - 0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20 - 0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02 - 0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30 - 0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25 - 3.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007 - 0.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18 - 0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.47 - 26.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78 - 24.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33 &#177; 0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17 &#177; 0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45 &#177; 0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88 &#177; 1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25 &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.95 &#177; 8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.09 &#177; 8.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WHO Standard</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. Interspecific Variations in Trace Element Concentrations in Fish’s Preys</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> indicates that the trace element contents are unevenly distributed in the prey species. These interspecific variations in trace element levels are confirmed by analysis of variances (ANOVA) which were found to be significant at the 5% level for all elements (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). However, this ANOVA is followed by the Newman-Keuls test which revealed several significant differences between the prey species considered in pairs and allowed them to be classified into homogeneous groups according to their levels of trace element accumulation. Thus, species bearing the same letter indices form a homogeneous group (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>In accordance with the trace element contents, the decreasing order of contamination of the prey species for each trace element is presented as indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. It is observed that the lowest levels are found most often in the fish species (C. hippos and T. zillii) while the highest levels are more recorded in species of Bivalves (M. perna) and Crustaceans (Pagurus sp.).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Analysis of variances (ANOVA) and Newman-Keuls test</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Analysis of variances (ANOVA) followed by Newman-Keuls test</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F. notialis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.05<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.10<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. amnicola</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.41<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.32<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.12<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >166.24<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. melanopterus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13<sup>ac</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.81<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.020<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.92<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.39<sup>aij</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. fimbriata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.49<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.80<sup>bdi</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.22<sup>ai</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. hippos</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19<sup>ad</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55<sup>bd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.10<sup>acdi</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.15<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. fusca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.52<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.43<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.24<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.38<sup>acd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >354.84<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. perna</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.33<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.77<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.38<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.46<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.146<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.72<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.65<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.29<sup>dgi</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pagurus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98<sup>cdf</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83<sup>bd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.82<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137.41<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.020<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.15<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137.80<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >206.33<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. paradoxa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.07<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.76b<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.27<sup>be</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.54<sup>eg</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.081<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75<sup>ce</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.55<sup>bg</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.18<sup>fgj</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. zillii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07<sup>af</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45<sup>bf</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88<sup>bh</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.95<sup>h</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.09<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F Values</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p Values</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values with different letters indicate a significant difference between species’ concentrations.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Decreasing order of prey species contamination for each trace element</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Trace elements</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Decreasing order of contamination in prey species</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mp &gt; Gp &gt; Ca &gt; Pf &gt; Psp &gt; Fn &gt; Ef &gt; Ch &gt; Em &gt; Tz</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mp &gt; Gp &gt; Psp &gt; Pf &gt; Ch &gt; Ef &gt; Ca &gt; Tz &gt; Em &gt; Fn</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Psp &gt; Mp &gt; Gp &gt; Pf &gt; Ca &gt; Em &gt; Fn &gt; Ef &gt; Ch &gt; Tz</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Psp &gt; Mp &gt; Gp &gt; Pf &gt; Fn &gt; Ca &gt; Ef &gt; Em &gt; Ch &gt; Tz</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Psp &gt; Fn &gt; Ca &gt; Pf &gt; Mp &gt; Gp &gt; Ef &gt; Em &gt; Tz &gt; Ch</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mp &gt; Gp &gt; Ef &gt; Psp &gt; Em &gt; Pf &gt; Ca &gt; Fn &gt; Tz &gt; Ch</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gp &gt; Mp &gt; Psp &gt; Ch &gt; Ef &gt; Pf &gt; Em &gt; Fn &gt; Ca &gt; Tz</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Psp &gt; Mp &gt; Gp &gt; Ca &gt; Em &gt; Ef &gt; Pf &gt; Ch &gt; Fn &gt; Tz</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pf &gt; Psp &gt; Ca &gt; Gp &gt; Mp &gt; Em &gt; Ef &gt; Fn &gt; Tz &gt; Ch</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Fn: F. notialis; Ca: C. amnicola; Em: E. melanopterus; Ef: E. fimbriata; Ch: C. hippos; Pf: P. fusca; Mp: M. perna; Psp: Pagurus sp.; Gp: G. paradoxa; Tz: T. zillii.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_3"><title>3.1.3. Intraspecific Variations in Trace Elements Concentration in Fish’s Preys</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows that the lowest element accumulated in all species is Hg. Its levels vary from 0.007 mg/kg observed in C hippos to 0.146 mg/kg obtained in M. perna. The highest levels of trace elements recorded are those of Cu in F. notialis, of Zn in the species Eucinostomus melanopterus, E. fimbriata, C. hippos, M. perna and T. zillii and of Mn in C. amnicola, P. fusca, Pagurus sp. and G. paradoxa. It therefore emerges that there is a variation in the levels of accumulation of trace elements in all the species studied. The order of accumulation of trace elements in each species was therefore established and presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_4"><title>3.1.4. Bioconcentration Factors Relative to Water (BCFw)</title><p>With the exception of Pb in the species F. notialis (BCFw = 0.90) and E. melanopterus (BCFw = 0.99), the other bioconcentration factors (BCFw) obtained are all greater than 1 and vary from 1, 26 for Cr in T. zillii to 12342.19 for Mn in P. fusca (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). The species which have accumulated more trace elements are those that lead a benthic life in direct contact with the sediments and are sedentary. These are the species P. fusca, M. perna, Pagurus sp., G. paradoxa. The least accumulators are exclusively composed of fish species (E. melanopterus, E. fimbriata, C. hippos, T. zillii).</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_5"><title>3.1.5. Bioconcentration Factors Relative to Sediments (BCFsed)</title><p>The bioconcentration factors of trace elements relative to sediment (BCFsed) are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>. They vary from 1.02 for Zn in C. hippos to 13.40 for Cu in Pagurus sp. Zn accumulation was observed in 80% of species with BCFsed between 1.02 obtained in C. hippos and 3.18 found in Pagurus sp. In addition, 60% of the species exhibited Cu BCFsed ranging from 2.48 in M. perna to 13.40 in Pagurus sp. Cd is accumulated by 50% of species with BCFsed varying from 1.63 in Pagurus sp. to 4.90 obtained in M. perna. Hg BCFsed greater than 1 were only found in M. perna (BCFsed = 3.33) and G. paradoxa (BCFsed = 1.84). Accumulation of Ni was observed only in Pagurus sp. with a BCFsed = 1.14.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Correlation Matrix between Trace Elements</title><p>Pearson’s correlations between trace elements in C. nigrodigitatus prey are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>. It indicates that all significant correlations between trace elements are positive. Thus, Cd is significantly correlated with Pb, Cr, Hg, As, Zn and Mn. As for Pb, it is significantly correlated with Cr, Hg, As and Zn. In addition,</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Order of accumulation of trace elements in each prey species</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Descending order of accumulation of trace elements</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F. notialis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu &gt; Zn &gt; Mn &gt; Ni &gt; As &gt; Cr &gt; Cd &gt; Pb &gt; Hg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. amnicola</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn &gt; Zn &gt; Cu &gt; Cd &gt; Ni &gt; Cr &gt; As &gt; Pb &gt; Hg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. melanopterus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn &gt; Mn &gt; Cu &gt; Ni &gt; Cr &gt; As &gt; Pb &gt; Cd &gt; Hg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. fimbriata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn &gt; Mn &gt; Cu &gt; Ni &gt; As &gt; Pb &gt; Cr &gt; Cd &gt; Hg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. hippos</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn &gt; Mn &gt; Cu &gt; As &gt; Pb &gt; Ni &gt; Cd &gt; Cr &gt; Hg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. fusca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn &gt; Zn &gt; Cu &gt; Ni &gt; Cr &gt; Cd &gt; Pb &gt; As &gt; Hg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. perna</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn &gt; Mn &gt; Cu &gt; Ni &gt; Pb &gt; As &gt; Cd &gt; Cr &gt; Hg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pagurus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn &gt; Zn &gt; Cu &gt; Ni &gt; Cr &gt; As &gt; Pb &gt; Cd &gt; Hg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. paradoxa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn &gt; Zn &gt; Cu &gt; Ni &gt; Pb &gt; As &gt; Cd &gt; Cr &gt; Hg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. zillii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn &gt; Mn &gt; Cu &gt; Ni &gt; Pb &gt; As &gt; Cr &gt; Cd &gt; Hg</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Bioconcentration factors of trace elements relative to water (BCFw)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Bioconcentration factors relative to water (BCFw)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F. notialis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >646.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >216.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2044.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >803.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. amnicola</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >638.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >204.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3621.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5782.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. melanopterus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >222.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3255.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2135.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. fimbriata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >277.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3147.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1781.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. hippos</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >527.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2245.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >353.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. fusca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >578.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2565.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12342.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. perna</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >382.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1514.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5686.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3349.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pagurus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >394.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1614.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >873.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7017.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7176.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. paradoxa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >229.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >211.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1524.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4051.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3623.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. zillii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1016.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >559.66</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Bioconcentration factors of trace elements relative to sediments (BCFsed)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Bioconcentration factors relative to sediments (BCFsed)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F. notialis.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. amnicola</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. melanopterus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. fimbriata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. hippos</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P. fusca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. perna</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pagurus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. paradoxa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. zillii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Pearson correlation matrix between preys’ trace elements</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >As</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Figures in bold show significant correlations with a: p &lt; 0.001; b: p &lt; 0.01; c: p &lt; 0.05.</p><p>significant correlations were obtained between Cr and other trace elements except Cd and Pb. Significant correlations were recorded between Ni and each of Cu, As, Zn and Mn. Cu shows a good correlation with Zn and Mn. Also, significant correlations were obtained between Hg and the elements As, Zn and between As and Zn.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Principal Components Analysis of Trace Element in C. nigrodigitatus’ Preys</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref> shows that the first 3 components explain 88.31% of the total variance with F1: 52.95%; F2: 24.97%; F3: 10.39%. However, the two components (F1 &#215; F2) alone explain 77.92% of the total variance. Thus, this map can explain most of the information contained in the data regarding the distribution of trace elements in the different prey species of C. nigrodigitatus.</p><p>The component F1 (52.95%) is determined in its negative part by the elements Cd, Pb, Cr, Ni, Hg, As and Zn with correlation coefficients presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>. Component F1 therefore indicates, from right to left, a contamination gradient in trace elements (Cd, Pb, Cr, Ni, Hg, As and Zn). The component F2 (24.97%) is determined in its negative part by the Cu (r = −0.77) and the Mn (r = −0.51) indicating, from top to bottom, a contamination gradient in Cu and Mn (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)).</p><p>Four groups of species can be distinguished in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b). The first group (G1) is essentially composed of fish (E. melanopterus, E. fimbriata, C. hippos and T. zillii) and shrimps (F. notialis). This group is characterized by the lowest levels of trace elements with Ni and Cu concentrations obtained in F. notialis which are much higher than those recorded in fish. The second group (G2) includes crabs (C. amnicola) and gastropods (P. fusca) which are characterized by fairly high levels of trace elements. However, the average Ni content of P. fusca is higher than that of C. amnicola. As for Cu contents, they are rather higher in C. amnicola than in P. fusca. The third (G3) and fourth (G4) groups have the highest levels of trace elements. The G3 group is formed from Pagurus sp. and presents the highest contents of Cr, Zn, Ni and Cu while group (G4) consists of M. perna and G. paradoxa characterized by the highest contents of Cd, Pb, Hg and As.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The preys of C. nigrodigitatus in the Lake Togo-Lagoon of An&#233;ho hydrosystem are diverse and includes fish, gastropods, crustaceans, bivalves, plants etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref24">24</xref>]. However, it is known that the accumulation of trace elements in the tissues of aquatic organisms, such as fish, also depends on their feeding behavior [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref38">38</xref>]. Thus, a few individuals from each taxon were assessed for their metallic contents. In fish species, the average concentrations recorded are higher than the quality standards of fishery products for Cd, Pb, Ni, Cu, As, Zn, Mn with the exception of Zn and Ni in T. zillii and Pb at E. fimbriata [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref43">43</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation between components and variables</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Components</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eugenvalues</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Total variance explained</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Cumulated variances</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.31</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>However, the average concentrations of Cr and Hg in fish are within quality standards [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref43">43</xref>]. With regard to shrimps (F. notialis) and crabs (C. amnicola), their average trace element contents do not meet quality standards with the exception of Hg for both species and Pb and Cr for F. notialis.</p><p>It appears that all species accumulated high concentrations of trace elements in their tissues with variations depending on the species. Indeed, the highest concentrations of trace elements were recorded in species of sedentary benthic macroinvertebrates such as molluscs and crustaceans P. fusca, Pagurus sp., M. perna, G. paradoxa and in another crustacean (C. amnicola) while the lowest concentrations were mainly observed in fish species which are more mobile and benthopelagic. This strong accumulation of trace elements in molluscs and crustaceans compared to fish has also been observed by Ali and Fishar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref44">44</xref>] in Lake Qarun (Egypte), by Ouro-Sama et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref45">45</xref>] in the Togolease lagoon system and by Zhang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref34">34</xref>] in marine environment in China. The difference in trace element accumulation between fish and benthic macroinvertebrates was demonstrated by principal component analysis (PCA). This confirms that the accumulation of trace elements varies widely depending on the species, food habits and lifestyle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref34">34</xref>]. Thus, these interspecific variations in the accumulation of trace elements may be due to differences in their physiology (absorption, biotransformation and excretion) and their feeding behavior in the ecosystem. Indeed, in most cases, the concentration of trace elements in organisms depends on the physiological properties and biological functions of the trace elements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref46">46</xref>]. Among other things, bivalves are benthic, fixed or free and live buried or on the surface of sediments which are considered as reservoirs of pollutants such as trace elements in aquatic ecosystems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref48">48</xref>]. In addition, being microphagous and filterers of large quantities of water, bivalves and certain crustaceans have the capacity to accumulate at high concentrations, numerous trace elements present in their immediate environment, both from water and from the particulate phase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref50">50</xref>]. These toxic trace elements can be accumulated in their tissues at high concentrations and without harmful effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref51">51</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref52">52</xref>]. The high accumulation of all trace elements is due to the fact that mollusks have a poor ability to discriminate between elements which are similar in certain characteristics such as the valence of ions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref53">53</xref>]. However, these mollusks have effective detoxification mechanisms that reduce the toxicity of the trace elements absorbed despite their high concentrations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref44">44</xref>].</p><p>The intraspecific variations of the recorded element contents can be explained by the fact that the accumulation of trace elements in the tissues of aquatic organisms depends not only on the species but also on the chemical nature of the element concerned (molecular size, speciation chemical, bioavailability, etc.) and the physicochemical characteristics of the medium (temperature and pH, salinity) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref33">33</xref>]. Indeed, whatever the route of entry of pollutants into the body, the intensity of absorption is extremely variable from one pollutant to another. This has been h attributed to the characteristics of the membrane barriers in contact with the external environment (branchial epithelium, digestive wall) and to those of the pollutants themselves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref55">55</xref>].</p><p>Results also indicate that bioconcentration factors relative to water (BCFw) are significantly higher than those relative to sediments (BCFsed). It can be inferred that, trace elements accumulated in the tissues of these aquatic organisms come mainly from water. These results corroborate those of other authors who believe that the levels of trace elements in tissues are largely influenced by their concentrations in water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref56">56</xref>]. Overall, the BCF values were higher for Cu, Zn As and Mn. These high accumulations may be due to physiological needs since these elements are essential for the unfolding of biological processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref57">57</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref59">59</xref>]. The significant correlations recorded between the trace elements indicate that these elements come from the same source and that their absorption, distributions and accumulations in each individual would respect the same physicochemical and biological processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref60">60</xref>]. The correlations between the different trace elements were confirmed by the results of the PCA thus indicating their common accumulation processes.</p><p>Contamination of these species is a threat to their consumers in general and to C. nigrodigitatus in particular. Thus, the consumption of these species can contribute to the accumulation of trace elements in their tissues leading to problems of toxicity and survival of the species and a perturbation of the ecological balance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114035-ref61">61</xref>]. Furthermore, humans at the end of the food chain cannot be spared the toxic effects of these trace elements.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>It emerges from this study that most of the species overall present concentrations higher than the WHO standards for all trace elements with the exception of Hg. Nevertheless, only M. perna and G. paradoxa recorded levels higher than the standard for Hg. The species most contaminated by trace elements are: M. perna (Cd, Pb, Hg), Pagurus sp. (Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn), G. paradoxa (As) and P. fusca (Mn) while the least contaminated are mainly composed of fish species notably T. zillii (Cd, Cr, Ni, As, Zn) and C. hippos (Cu, Hg and Mn). The concentrations of trace elements varied greatly from species to species and within species. Bioconcentration factors relative to water (BCFw) showed that these species strongly accumulated trace elements in their tissues with BCFw that reached 92.58 for Cd, 44.72 for Pb, 382.49 for Hg and 1514.34 for As in M. perna. This contamination of preferred prey by catfish exposes the species and humans being to contamination by trace elements following its consumption. It is therefore imperative to pay particular attention to this ecosystem and to put in place a better management plan.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was co-funded by the International Foundation for Science (IFS) in Sweden, the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons (OPCW) in (Netherland) (IFS Scholarship: I-2-A-6056-1). We also wish to express our gratitude to the Laboratory of Management, Treatment and Valorization of Waste (Laboratoire de Gestion, Traitement et Valorisatiuon des D&#233;chets (GTVD)) of the University of Lom&#233; (Togo).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ouro-Sama, K., Afiademanyo, K.M., Solitoke, H.D., Tanouayi, G., Badassan, T.E.-E., Adje, K., Agbere, S. and Gnandi, K. (2021) Trace Elements in Mollusks, Crustaceans and Fish Commonly Consumed by the Catfish Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus Lac&#233;p&#232;de, 1803 from the Lake Togo-Lagoon of An&#233;ho Hydrosystem (Southern Togo). Journal of Environmental Protection, 12, 1185-1203. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2021.1212070</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.114035-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gnandi, K., Rezaie, B. and Edorh, A.P. (2009) The Geochemical Characterization of Mine Effluents from the Phosphorite Processing Plant of Kpémé (Southern Togo). Mine Water Environment, 28, 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-008-0058-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Monroy, M., Maceda-Veiga, A. and De Sostoa, A. (2014) Metal Concentration in Water, Sediment and Four Fish Species from Lake Titicaca Reveals a Large-Scale Environmental Concern. Science of the Total Environment, 487, 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.134</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jayaprakash, M., Kumar, R.S., Giridharan, L., Sujitha, S.B., Sarkar, S.K. and Jonathan, M.P. (2015) Bioaccumulation of Metals in Fish Species from Water and Sediments in Macrotidal Ennore Creek, Chennai, SE Coast of India: A Metropolitan City Effect. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 120, 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.05.042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouro-Sama, K., Solitoke, H.D., Tanouayi, G., Lazar, I.M., Bran, P., Nadejde, M., Ahoudi, H., Badassan, T.E.-E., Nyametso, A.Y., Gnandi, K. and Lazar, G.O. (2020) Spatial and Seasonal Variation of Trace Elements Contamination Level of the Waters from the Hydrosystem Lake Togo-Lagoon of Aného (South of Togo). SN Applied Sciences, 2, Article No. 811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2593-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouro-Sama, K., Solitoke, H.D., Tanouayi, G., Lazar, I.M., Bran, P., Nadejde, M., Badassan, T.E.-E., Ahoudi, H., Nyametso, A.Y., Gnandi, K. and Lazar, G.O. (2021) Spatial and Seasonal Variation of Trace Elements Contamination in the Sediments of a Tropical Lagoon System: The Lake Togo-Lagoon of Aného Complex (Southern Togo). Environmental Earth Sciences, 80, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09390-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Uysal, K., K&amp;ouml;se, E., Bülbül, M., D&amp;ouml;nmez, M., Erdogan, Y. and Koyun, M. (2009) The Comparison of Heavy Metal Accumulation Ratios of Some Fish Species in Enne Damme Lake (Kütahya/Turkey). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 157, 355-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0540-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andem, A.B., George, U.U. and Eyo, V.O. (2013) Length Frequency Distribution of (Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus) (Lecepede, 1803) (Chrysichthys, Bagridae) from Itu Head Brigde, in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. International Journal of Science and Research, 2, 258-266.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Babalola, O.A. and Fiogbe, D.E. (2017) Metal Pollutants Distribution and Bioaccumulation in Two Ecological Important Fisheries Resources; Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus and Callinectes latimanus from Porto-Novo Lagoon Ecosystem, Benin Republic. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 5, 162-167.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abhijit, M., Prabal, B., Sufia, Z. and Kakoli, B. (2012) Analysis of Trace Metals in Commercially Important Crustaceans Collected from UNESCO Protected World Heritage Site of Indian Sundarbans. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 12, 53-66.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ben Salem, Z., Capelli, N., Laffray, X., Elise, G., Ayadi, H. and Aleya, L. (2014) Seasonal Variation of Heavy Metals in Water, Sediment and Roach Tissues in a Landfill Draining System Pond (Etueffont, France). Ecological Engineering, 69, 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.072</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Monferran, M.V., Garnero, P.L., Wunderlin, D.A. and Bistoni, M.d.L.A. (2016) Potential Human Health Risks from Metals and As via Odontesthes bonariensis Consumption and Ecological Risk Assessments in a Eutrophic Lake. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 129, 302-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.03.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harley, C.D.G., Randall Hughes, A., Hultgren, K.M., Miner, B.G., Sorte, C.J.B., Thornber, C.S., Rodriguez, L.F., Tomanek, L. and Williams, S.L. (2006) The Impacts of Climate Change in Coastal Marine Systems. Ecology Letters, 9, 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00871.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, G.C. and Parrish, J.D. (2002) Estuaries as Nurseries for the Jacks Caranx ignobilis and Caranx melampygus (Carangidae) in Hawaii. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 55, 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2001.0909</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gning, N. (2008) écologie trophique des juvéniles de quatre espèces de poissons dans l’estuaire inverse du Sine-Saloum (Sénégal): Influence des conditions de salinité contrastées. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Montpellier II, Montpellier.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ekanem</surname><given-names> S.B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>Some Reproductive Aspects of Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus (Lacépède) from Cross River, Nigeria. Naga</article-title><source> The ICLARM Quarterly</source><volume> 23</volume>,<fpage> 24</fpage>-<lpage>28</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Affourmou, K., Nobah, C.S.K. and Alla, Y.L. (2014) Aquacultural Potential of Silver Catfish Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus (Lacepede, 1803) Bred in Fresh and Brakish Water in Three Rearing Systems: Enclosures, Cement Tanks and Earth Ponds. Advances Bioresearch, 5, 165-171.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mélila, M., Poutouli, W., Amouzou, K.S., Tchangbédji, G., Tchaou, M. and Doh, A. (2012) Evaluation de l’impact du rejet des déchets phosphates dans la mer sur la biodiversité marine dans trois localités c&amp;ocirc;tières au Togo à partir des biomarqueurs du stress oxydatif chez Sphyraena barracuda (Heckel, 1843). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 6, 820-831. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v6i2.24</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bouka, E., Lawson-Evi, P., Eklu-Gadegbeku, K., Aklikokou, K. and Gbeassor, M. (2013) Heavy Metals Concentration in Soil, Water, Manihot esculenta Tuber and Oreochromis niloticus around Phosphates Exploitation Area in Togo. Research Journal of Environmental Toxicology, 7, 18-28. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjet.2013.18.28</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aduayi-Akue, A.A. and Gnandi, K. (2014) Evaluation de la pollution par les métaux lourds des sols et de la variété locale du ma&amp;iuml;s Zea mays dans la zone de traitement des phosphates de Kpémé (Sud du Togo). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 8, 2347-2355. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v8i5.37</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tanouayi, G., Gnandi, K., Ahoudi, H. and Ouro-Sama, K. (2015) La contamination métallique des eaux de surface et des eaux souterraines de la zone minière d’exploitation des phosphates de Hahotoé-Kpogamé (Sud-Togo): Cas du Cadmium, Plomb, Cuivre et Nickel. Larhyss Journal, 21, 35-50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gnandi, K. (2002) L’impact de l’exploitation des phosphates sédimentaires de Hahotoé-Kpogamé sur la pollution chimique des sédiments du fleuve Haho et du lac (Sud Togo). Journal de la Recherche Scientifique de l’Université de Lomé, Série A, 6, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.4314/jrsul.v6i2.17085</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bortey-Sam, N., Nakayama, S.M.M., Ikenaka, Y., Akoto, O., Yohannes, Y.B., Baidoo, E., Mizukawa, H. and Ishizuka, M. (2015) Human Health Risks from Metals and Metalloid via Consumption of Food Animals near Gold Mines in Tarkwa, Ghana: Estimation of the Daily Intakes and Target Hazard Quotients (THQs). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 111, 160-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.09.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Millet, B. (1986) Hydrologie et hydrochimie d’un milieu lagunaire tropical: Le lac Togo. Collection Etudes et Thèses, Edition ORSTOM, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouro-Sama, K., Afiademanyo, K.M., Solitoke, H.D., Tanouayi, G., Badassan, T.E.-E., Ahoudi, H. and Gnandi, K. (2020) Diet and Food Consumption of the African Catfish, Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus Lacépède (1803) (Silu-Riformes: Claroteidae), from the Hydrosystem Lake Togo-Lagoon of Aného (South of Togo). Journal of Environmental Protection, 11 954-976. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2020.1111060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dhanakumar, S., Solaraj, G. and Mohanraj, R. (2015) Heavy Metal Partitioning in Sediments and Bioaccumulation in Commercial Fish Species of Three Major Reservoirs of River Cauvery Delta Region, India. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 113, 145-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.11.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">USEPA (2000) Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use in Fish Advisories, Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis, 3rd Edition. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 823-B-00-007, Office of Water (4305), Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pascal, M., Heyman, C., De Baudouin, C. and Pirard, P. (2008) Comment intégrer l’objectif d’exposition des consommateurs dans les prélèvements et analyses des poissons d’eaux douces: Eléments méthodologique. Environnement, Risques &amp; Santé, 8, 57-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taghipour, V. and Azizi, S.N. (2010) Determination of Trace Elements in Muscle Tissue of Caspian Roaches (Rutilus rutilus caspicus) Collected in Iranian Coastal Waters of the Caspian Sea. Iranica Journal of Energy &amp; Environment, 2, 47-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Morhit, M., Belghity, D. and El Morhit, A. (2013) Contamination métallique de Pagellus acarne, Sardina pilchardus et Diplodus vulgaris de la c&amp;ocirc;te atlantique sud (Maroc). Larhyss Journal, 14, 131-148.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fathi, H.B., Othman, M.S., Mazlan, A.G., Arshad, A., Amin, S.M.N. and Simon, K.D. (2013) Trace Metals in Muscle, Liver and Gill Tissues of Marine Fishes from Mersing, Eastern Coast of Peninsular Malaysia: Concentration and Assessment of Human Health Risk. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advance, 8, 227-2236. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2013.227.236</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bastami, K.D., Afkhami, M., Mohammadizadeh, M., Ehsanpour, M., Chambari, S., Aghaei, S., Esmaeilzadeh, M., Neyestani, M.R., Lagzaee, F. and Baniamam, M. (2015) Bioaccumulation and Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in the Sediments and Mullet Liza klunzingeri in the Northern Part of the Persian Gulf. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 94, 329-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.01.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trevizani, T.H., Figueira, R.C.L., Ribeiro, A.P., Theophilo, C.Y.S., Majer, A.P., Petti, M.A.V., Corbisier, T.N. and Montone, R.C. (2016) Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in Marine Organisms and Sediments from Admiralty Bay, King George Island, Antarctica. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 106, 366-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.02.056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Casas, S. (2005) Modélisation de la bioaccumulation de métaux traces (Hg, Cd, Pb, Cu et Zn) chez la moule, Mytilus galloprovincialis en milieu méditerranéen. Thèse de Doctorat, Université du Sud Toulon Var, Toulon.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, L., Shi, Z., Jiang, Z., Zhang, J., Wang, F. and Huang, X. (2015) Distribution and Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals in Marine Organisms in East and West Guangdong Coastal Regions, South China. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 101, 930-937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.10.041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spanos, T., Simeonov, V., Simeonova, P., Apostolidou, E. and Stratis, J. (2008) Environmetrics to Evaluate Marine Environment Quality. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 143, 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9970-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jamshidi-Zanjani, A. and Saeedi, M. (2013) Metal Pollution Assessment and Multivariate Analysis in Sediment of Anzali International Wetland. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70, 1791-1808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2267-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Varol, M. (2011) Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in Sediments of the Tigris River (Turkey) Using Pollution Indices and Multivariate Statistical Techniques. Journal of Hazard Materials, 195, 355-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karadede, H., Oymak, S.A. and ünlü, E. (2004) Heavy Metals in Mullet, Liza abu, and Cat-Fish, Silurus triostegus, from the Atatürk Dam Lake (Euphrates), Turkey. Environment International, 30, 183-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(03)00169-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OMS/FAO (1995) Norme générale codex pour les contaminants et les toxines présents dans les produits de consommation humaine et animale. OMS/FAO, Codex standard 193-1995.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OMS/FAO (2005) Liste provisoire des principales espèces de poissons faisant l’objet d’un commerce international (y compris propositions concernant des concentrations maximales de plomb dans différentes espèces de poissons). Programme mixte FAO/ OMS sur les normes alimentaires comite du codex sur les additifs alimentaires et les contaminants. Trente-septième session, La Haye, Pays-Bas.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FEPA (2003) Guidelines and Standards for Environmental Pollution Control in Nigeria. Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA), Abuja.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CE (2001) Règlement Commission Européenne (CE) No 466/2001 de la commission portant fixation de teneurs maximales pour certains contaminants dans les denrées alimentaires. Commission Européenne (CE).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EU (2008) Commission Regulation (EC) No. 629/2008. Setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in food stuffs European Union (EU), Official Journal of the European Union, L173.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, M.H.H. and Fishar, M.R.A. (2005) Accumulation of Trace Metals in Some Benthic Invertebrate and Fish Species Relevant to Their Concentration in Water and Sediment of Lake Qarun, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 31, 289-301.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouro-Sama, K., Solitoke, H.D., Gnandi, K., Afiademanyo, K.M. and Bowessidjaou, E.J. (2014) évaluation et risques sanitaires de la bioaccumulation de métaux lourds chez des espèces halieutiques du système lagunaire togolais. VertigO-la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement, 14, 2-18. https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.15093</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sfakianakis, D.G., Renieri, E., Kentouri, M. and Tsatsakis, A.M. (2015) Effect of Heavy Metals on Fish Larvae Deformities: A Review. Environmental Resources, 137, 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.12.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, K.M., Metongo, B.S., Trokourey, A. and Boka, Y. (2009) Assessment of Sediments Contamination by Heavy Metals in a Tropical Lagoon Urban Area (Ebrié Lagoon, C&amp;ocirc;te d’Ivoire). European Journal of Scientific research, 34, 280-289.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bastami, K.D., Bagheri, H., Haghparast, S., Soltani, F., Hamzehpoor, A. and Bastami, M.D. (2012) Geochemical and Geo-Statistical Assessment of Selected Heavy Metals in the Surface Sediments of the Gorgan Bay, Iran. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 64, 2877-2884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.08.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gagnon, C. and Fisher, N.S. (1997) Bioavailability of Sediment Bound Methyl Mercury and Inorganic Mercury to a Marine Bivalve. Environnement, Science et Technologie, 31, 993-998. https://doi.org/10.1021/es960364k</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taleb, M.Z. and Boutiba, Z. (2007) La moule Mytilus galloprovincialis: Bioindicatrice de pollution marine—Cas du port D’Oran. Sciences &amp; Technologie C, 25, 59-64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lobel, P.B., Belkhode, S.P., Jackson, S.E. and Longerich, H.P. (1990) Recent Taxonomic Discoveries Concerning the Mussel Mytilus: Implications for Biomonitoring. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 19, 508-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059068</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Metcalfe-Smith, J.L., Merriman, J.C. and Batchelor, S.P. (1992) Relationships between Concentrations of Metals in Sediment and Two Species of Freshwater Mussels in the Ottawa River. Water Pollution Research Journal of Canada, 27, 845-869. https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.1992.051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jeffree, R.A., Markich, S.J. and Brown, P.L. (1993) Comparative Accumulation of Alkaline-Earth Metals by Two Freshwater Mussel Species from the Nepean River, Australia: Consistencies and a Resolved Paradox. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Resources, 44, 609-634. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9930609</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Baran, E. (1999) R&amp;ocirc;le des estuaires vis-a-vis de la ressource halieutique c&amp;ocirc;tiere en Guinée. In: Domain, F., Chavance, P. and Diallo, A., Eds., La pêche c&amp;ocirc;tière en Guinée: ressources et exploitation, Editions IRD, La Chapelle-Montligeon, 137-157.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Monod, G. (2001) Le poisson: Cible et révélateur de la pollution chimique. In: Neveu, A., Riou, C., Bonhomme, R., Chassin, P. and Papy, F., Eds., L’eau dans l’Espace Rural: Vie et milieu aquatiques, INRA, Paris, 174-197.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dsikowitzky, L., Mengesha, M., Dadebo, E., de Carvalho, C.E. and Sindern, S. (2013) Assessment of Heavy Metals in Water Samples and Tissues of Edible Fish Species from Awassa and Koka Rift Valley Lakes, Ethiopia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185, 3117-3131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2777-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crossgrove, J. and Yokel, R. (2005) Manganese Distribution across the Blood-Brain barrierIV. Evidence for Brain Influx through Store-Operated Calcium Channels. Neuro-Toxicology, 26, 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2004.09.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">&amp;Ccedil;ifti, N., Ay, &amp;Ouml;., Karayakar, F., Cicik, B. and Erdem, C. (2015) Effects of Zinc and Cadmium on Condition Factor, Hepatosomatic and Gonadosomatic Index of Oreochromis niloticus. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 24, 3871-3874.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fafioye, O.O., Oladunjoye, R.Y., Bamidele, T.T. and Ige, T.A. (2017) Determination of Heavy Metal Levels in Oreochromis niloticus and Chrysichthys nigrodigitatus from Ogun River, Nigeria. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture, 9, 86-91. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJFA2015.0491</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nguyen, H.L., Leermakers, M., Elskensa, M., De Ridder, F., Doan, T.H. and Baeyens, W. (2005) Correlations, Partitioning and Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals between Different Compartments of Lake Balaton. Science of the Total Environment, 341, 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114035-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farombi, E.O., Adelowo, O.A. and Ajimoko, Y.R. (2007) Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress and Heavy Metal Levels as Indicators of Environmental Pollution in African Cat Fish (Clarias gariepinus) from Nigeria Ogun River. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 4, 158-165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2007040011</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>