<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2021.1112161</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-114031</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Materno-Foetal Morbidity in the Second Stage of Labour: A Cohort Study in Primiparous Women in Yaounde
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Félix</surname><given-names>Essiben</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Khadidja</surname><given-names>Bayero</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hapsatou</surname><given-names>Ahmadou Djoulatou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maye</surname><given-names>Ange Ngo Dingom</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Julius</surname><given-names>Sama Dohbit</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cliford</surname><given-names>Ebontane Ebong</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pascal</surname><given-names>Foumane</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Yaoundé Central Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yaounde Gyneco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Central Maternity, Yaoundé Central Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, the University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1725</fpage><lpage>1734</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>27,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: 
  Prolonged Second Stage of Labor (SSL) is known to increase maternal and foetal morbidity. We, therefore, aimed to assess for the occurrence of complications of the SSL in relation to its duration in primiparous women in Yaounde. <b>Methods:</b> It was a cohort study carried out at the Yaounde Gynaeco-Obstetric and Paediatric Hospital over a period of 6 months, from December 19, 2018 through May 3, 2019. We included for the study nulliparous pregnant women with singleton pregnancies and normal uteri. Data collected were analysed using EPI info 7 and SPSS version 2.0 software.<b> Results:</b> Amongst 327 nulliparas, the SSL lasted more than one hour in 120 (36.7%), and more than two hours in 42 (12.8%). The most common maternal complications observed were genital lacerations (23.6%; 28/120), instrumental deliveries (20.2%, 24/120), post-partum haemorrhage (8.9%). Foetal complications included caput succedaneum (15.2%; 18/120) and perinatal asphyxia (7.5%; 9/120). Maternal complications were significantly increased in women with an SSL lasting 1
   
  -
   
  2 hours (44.9% versus 22.7%; p
   &lt; 
  0.001) and &gt;2 hours (42.9% versus 22.7%; p
   
  =
   
  0.007). Similarly, for foetal complications 23.1% occurred with SSLs between 1
   
  -
   
  2 hours (versus 6.3%; p
   &lt; 
  0.001) and 19.0% for SSLs &gt;
   
  2 hours (versus 6.3%; p
   
  =
   
  0.007).<b> Conclusion:</b> Maternal and foetal complications increase when the SSL exceeds 1 hour in primiparas. Identifying factors that predispose to a prolonged SSL and indicating appropriate interventions could help prevent morbidity.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Second Stage of Labour</kwd><kwd> Duration</kwd><kwd> Primiparas</kwd><kwd> Morbidity</kwd><kwd> Yaounde</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Many authors define the Second Stage of Labour (SSL) as the interval between full cervical dilatation and the delivery of the foetus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref1">1</xref>]. There is no universal consensus regarding the acceptable maximum duration of this stage of labour. Various factors may influence the length of the SSL including maternal factors such as the size and shape of the pelvis, the intensity of the expulsive effort, and especially, the history of past deliveries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref2">2</xref>]. The duration of the SSL also depends on a woman’s parity, and the use or non-use of epidural analgesia. The SSL tends to last longer in primiparas or following the administration of peridural analgesia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref1">1</xref>]. These aspects are therefore factored into the acceptable duration of the SSL. The SSL is said to be protracted when it lasts longer than 2 hours in nulliparas or longer than 1 hour in multiparas absent epidural anaesthesia. Following the administration of epidural anaesthesia, however, the threshold is 3 hours in nulliparas and 2 hours in multiparous women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>In general, the proportion of spontaneous vaginal births without major complications drops significantly as the SSL prolongs, irrespective of the parity and/or the use of epidural analgesia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref4">4</xref>]. Evaluating for complications after a certain duration should be considered and the ensuing management should depend on the patient and the technical plateau of the care setting, even though the tendency is to allow labour to continue to achieve vaginal delivery, especially in nulliparas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref5">5</xref>]. Although the optimum duration for the SSL is not known, the diagnosis of prolonged SSL should only be made after 2 and 3 hours of expulsive effort for nulliparas and multiparas, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref6">6</xref>]. However, this approach depends on the availability of adequate maternal and foetal monitoring. Prolonged SSL is associated with high rates of vaginal delivery but also an increased risk of maternal and foetal complications including post-partum haemorrhage, infections, and perineal trauma, poor Apgar scores, perinatal asphyxia and increased neonatology admissions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>We aimed to observe clinical practices and outcomes in our setting, where the tendency is to intervene after 1 hour. In one meta-analysis, Abolos et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref1">1</xref>] found that the median SSL with good maternal and perinatal prognosis varied between 14 to 66 minutes, and 6 to 12 minutes for nulliparas and multiparas respectively. While there is no consensus for such an empirical approach in our setting it could nonetheless be justified by the need for timely referrals to appropriate health facilities. The objective of this study is to assess the incidence of maternal and foetal complications when the SSL lasts longer than 1 hour.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Research Method</title><p>The study was a prospective cohort study carried out at the maternity of the Yaounde Gynaeco-Obstetric and Paediatric Hospital (YGOPH) over 6 months, between December 19 2018 and May 3 2019. We recruited all nulliparas admitted in labour with a singleton term pregnancy (37 completed weeks and above) and with foetus in cephalic presentation. Parturients who presented with maternal complications (preeclampsia/eclampsia, uterine malformations, scarred uteri), foetal complications (intrauterine growth restriction, foetal malformations, intrauterine foetal demise), or placental anomalies were excluded. The parturients were distributed into 3 groups: group I was for parturients whose SSL lasted less than 1 hour; group II for those whose SSL lasted between 1 and 2 hours and group III was for those whose SSL lasted &gt;2 hours. We carried out random sampling.</p><p>The variables of interest included demographic characteristics (age, marital status), clinical characteristics (gestational age, body mass index, mode of delivery, duration of SSL), maternal outcomes (vaginal and perineal lacerations, post-partum haemorrhage, puerperal sepsis) and foetal outcomes (APGAR scores at the 5th minute, admission into the neonatal care unit). The SSL was timed beginning from when the diagnosis of full cervical dilatation was made and the parturient asked to bear down.</p><p>After obtaining administrative authorisation and ethical clearance from the YGOPH, we collected data from all eligible parturients following direct interviews and physical examination onto pre-existing data collection forms.</p><p>After we obtained the patients’ consent, we consulted their antenatal care records to verify for any non-inclusion criteria. All those who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were followed up during labour and delivery, and through the first 3 days (72 hours) following delivery in the maternity wards. Regarding the neonates, we collected information on their anthropometric measurements and APGAR scores in the delivery room, and information concerning their progress and outcome during their mothers’ stay in the maternity ward.</p><p>Data collection was done on an individual basis, using a standardised questionnaire. We analysed the data using Epi Info 7 and the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20.0. We estimated the frequency of complications in each of the groups formed and we compared the frequencies of the aforementioned complications in groups II and III with that of group I (reference group). The Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare the frequencies with a significance level α set at 5%. P values &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>We recorded 1023 deliveries amongst which we had 354 deliveries by primiparas. We however excluded 27 primiparas from the study because, in these parturients, the duration of the second stage of labour could not be ascertained. Thus, we retained 327 primiparas for the study.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Duration of Labor</title><p>The SSL lasted &lt; 1 hour (group I) in 63.3% (207/327) of the parturients, between 1 - 2 hours (group II) in 23.9% (78/327) of the parturients and &gt;2 hours (group III) in 12.8% (42/327) of the parturients.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Frequency of Maternal and Fetal Complications</title><p>Maternal complications were significantly higher in group II compared to group I (44.9% (35/78) versus 22.7% (47/207); p &lt; 0.001) and in group III compared to group I (42.9% (18/42) versus 22.7% (47/207); p = 0.007). The same was true of foetal complications which were significantly higher in group II compared to group I (23.1% (18/78) versus 6.3% (13/207); p &lt; 0.001) and in group III compared to group I (19% (8/42) versus 6.3% (13/207); p = 0.007).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Types of Complications</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the maternal and foetal complications found in groups I, II and III. When the duration of SSL was between 1 - 2 hours, the most common maternal complications were episiotomies (44.9% (35/78) and instrumental deliveries (12.8%; 10/78); while the foetal complications were asphyxia (11.5%; 9/78) and the presence of caput succedaneum (23.1%; 18/78). When the duration of the SSL was greater than 2 hours, additional maternal complications included genital tract lacerations (38.1%; 16/42), postpartum haemorrhage (16.8%; 7/42) and caesarean deliveries (12.6%; 5/42). For the foetus, foetal asphyxia (23.8%; 10/42) and caput (19.0%; 8/42), occurred frequently.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Comparison of Frequency of Complications in the Different Groups</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the comparison of maternal and foetal complications between groups I and III. Episiotomies were more frequently performed when the SSL lasted between 1 - 2 hours (p &lt; 0.001), with increased frequencies of birth asphyxia (p = 0.002), and caput succedaneum (P &lt; 0.001) amongst the newborn in this group. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> reveals the comparison between maternal and foetal complications in groups I and III. When the SSL was greater than 2 hours, the following</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Maternal and foetal complications</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group I N = 207 (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group II N = 78 (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group III N = 42 (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Maternal complications</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lacerations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (24.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (15.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (38.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Episiotomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47 (25.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (44.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (42.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphincter involvement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (3.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (10.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-partum haemorrhage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (5.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (5.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (16.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Instrumental delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (11.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (12.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (34.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caesarean deliveries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (5.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (7.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (12.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-partum pyrexia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (3.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (1.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (4.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Foetal complications</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Birth asphyxia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (2.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (11.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (23.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caput succedaneum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (6.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (23.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (19.0)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of the frequency of complications between groups I and III</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group III N = 42 (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group I N = 207 (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Maternal complications</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genital tract lacerations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (38.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (20.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Episiotomies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (42.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47 (22.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphincter involvement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (10.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (3.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.058</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-partum haemorrhage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (16.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (5.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Instrumental delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (34.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (11.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caesarean deliveries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (12.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (5.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.082</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-partum pyrexia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (4.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (3.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.811</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Foetal complications</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Birth asphyxia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (23.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (2.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caput succedaneum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (19.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (6.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of the frequencies of complications between groups I and II</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group II N = 78 (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group I N = 207 (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Maternal complications</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genital lacerations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (15.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (20.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.348</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Episiotomies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (44.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47 (22.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphincter involvement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (3.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.341</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-partum haemorrhage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (5.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (5.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.946</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Instrumental delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (12.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (11.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.781</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caesarean deliveries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (7.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (5.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.446</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-partum pyrexia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (1.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (3.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.331</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Foetal complications</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Birth asphyxia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (11.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (2.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caput succedaneum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (23.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (6.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>complications increased significantly: genital tract lacerations (p = 0.013), episiotomies (p = 0.007), postpartum haemorrhage (p = 0.007), instrumental deliveries (p &lt; 0.001), birth asphyxia (p &lt; 0.000) and caput (p &lt; 0.001).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The duration of the second stage of labour in a parturient whose pelvis has no prior exposure to the process of childbirth is an important topic, and its determinants are still to be identified. By observing the outcome in a population of nulliparas during the SSL, this study showed that 36.7% of them gave birth more than 1 hour after full cervical dilatation. The proportion of women whose SSL lasted over 1 hour is variable. Several factors could influence the duration of the SSL. These include foetal factors such as weight and position, or maternal factors such as the type of maternal pelvis, the quality of expulsion efforts, the existence of comorbidities such as high blood pressure or diabetes and the history of previous deliveries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref2">2</xref>]. Le Ray et al., in 2009 in Canada [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref11">11</xref>] reported a similar frequency to ours at 34.2%. Conversely, other authors have observed a lower proportion of parturients in whom the SSL exceeded 1 hour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref7">7</xref>]. After 1 hour in SSL, maternal and foetal complications become more frequent as labour lasts longer. Many authors have reported similar results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>The fact that the duration of the SSL considered normal in our context is set at less than 1 hour often leads practitioners to intervene after this duration by carrying out either an episiotomy, or instrumental delivery when vaginal delivery is possible. Episiotomies are indicated either to facilitate delivery of the foetal head or prior to instrumental deliveries. The distress caused by labour pains, especially considering the systematic unavailability of epidural analgesia in our context favours these interventions during the SSL. Our results show that when the SSL lasts more than an hour, the frequency of instrumental and caesarean deliveries increase two to three-fold. It appears clearly from our results that the frequency of instrumental and caesarean deliveries increases with increasing time spent at full dilatation and markedly so after 2 hours. In the literature, many authors have reported results similar to ours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref17">17</xref>]. According to Le Ray et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref11">11</xref>], the rate of instrumental and caesarean deliveries increased 2-fold for SSL durations between 1 - 2 hours, 9-fold between 2 - 3 hours, and 30-fold after 3 hours.</p><p>It seems obvious that a certain number of unnecessary interventions and/or caesarean deliveries are induced by limiting the duration of the second stage to 1 hour. This is because a good proportion of women still give birth beyond 1 hour of waiting time without complications. However, there should be adequate maternal and foetal monitoring and due consideration must be given to referral considerations (time, challenges) towards the adequate health facilities.</p><p>Epidural analgesia tends to prolong the duration of the SSL [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref18">18</xref>]. It creates a sensory and motor blockade, which affects the rotation of the foetal head and the quality of the expulsive effort. Epidural analgesia, therefore, would have an impact on the frequency of normal deliveries, given the practitioners’ tendency to over intervene when faced with a protracted SSL rather than by the objective confirmation of maternal or foetal complications.</p><p>Prolonged SSL was associated with a significant increase in the frequency of perineal lacerations even though there was no increase in the frequency of sphincter damage compared to women in the reference group (SSL duration of less than one hour). The frequency of these tears increased steadily for each hour spent beyond 2 hours following complete dilatation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref15">15</xref>]. According to Laughon et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref7">7</xref>] the frequency of perineal lacerations increases significantly after 3 hours in the SSL.</p><p>Postpartum haemorrhage could result not only from birth canal trauma but also and especially from uterine atony. Prolonged labour could lead to uterine atony due to the failure of uterine muscles to contract after foetal expulsion, leading to critical blood loss. In our study population, postpartum haemorrhage increased significantly beyond 1 hour of the SSL and even more after 2 hours. Some authors reported that the rate of postpartum haemorrhage increased from 4.2%, when the second stage lasts between 1 hour and 2 hours, to 14.8% after 3 hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref19">19</xref>]. Postpartum haemorrhage is a major cause of maternal death in our setting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>The foetal complications such as caput succedaneum and birth asphyxia, appear as soon as the duration of the SSL exceeds 1 hour and tend to increase over time. These complications can compromise perinatal survival. Prolongation of the SSL beyond 3 hours leads to an increase in foetal acidosis with no real impact on the neurological prognosis of the newborn [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref22">22</xref>]. Limited access to quality newborn care is a limiting factor for extending the SSL.</p><p>Foetal asphyxia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref23">23</xref>]. It is responsible for about 16% of perinatal deaths in Cameroon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref24">24</xref>]. Chiabi et al. reported an incidence of 80.5 per 1000 livebirths in the urban setting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref25">25</xref>]. Prolonged labour increases the risk of birth asphyxia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref26">26</xref>] since it is associated with foetal acidosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref27">27</xref>]. The requirements for newborn resuscitation in cases of birth asphyxia in terms of trained personnel and appropriate equipment and consumables, are quite significant, thus preference is given to measures that prevent prolonged labour. Birth asphyxia is also associated with instrumental and caesarean deliveries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref28">28</xref>]. Caesarean deliveries increase the risk of foetal asphyxia compared to vaginal deliveries, especially amongst primigravidas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref29">29</xref>]. This may be explained by the fact that caesarean deliveries usually follow prolonged labour or the advent of other complications. Therefore, limiting the duration of the second stage of labour could consequently avert additional morbidity.</p><p>Caput succedaneum is a subcutaneous swelling caused by the collection of blood and serum in the scalp of the neonate. It is caused by the pressure of the head against the uterine cervix or the bony pelvis. It resolves within a week from delivery. It may lead to anaemia or exacerbate neonatal jaundice if it is very severe. Jaundice requires special medical care as the risk of death and irreversible neurological complications are considerable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.114031-ref30">30</xref>].</p><p>Our study presented some limitations. First, we were not always certain as to the exact time when the parturient achieved complete cervical dilatation. Next, some women began bearing down prior to full cervical dilatation. Furthermore, maternal challenges due to fatigue, prolonged fasting and dehydration could influence maternal bearing down efforts and hence our overall findings, this especially considering the fact that a significant proportion of our parturients were referred to us from health facilities where obstetrical practices do not reflect WHO recommendations. Finally, the variability of pain threshold across different women could have influenced our results as the subjective appreciation of a woman’s pain is key to the clinical diagnosis of the SSL.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>There is an increased frequency of maternal and foetal complications when the SSL exceeds 1 hour in primiparous women. The frequency of SSL complications increases proportionally with time, with potentially severe maternal morbidity occurring after 2 hours. Identifying factors that predispose to a prolonged SSL and intervening appropriately could help to reduce such morbidity.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Authors’ Approval</title><p>All authors agree to the submission of this article.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Authors’ Contribution</title><p>Bayero Khadidja designed the study and undertook data collection. Essiben F&#233;lix, Dohbit Julius and Foumane Pascal participated in the study design, performed data edits and statistical analyses, wrote the draft, and reviewed and finalized the manuscript. Djalatou Hapsatou, Ngo Dingom Madye and Ebong Cliford participated in statistical analyses, and edited and reviewed the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Competing Interest</title><p>The authors declared no competing interests.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Essiben, F., Bayero, K., Dljoulatou, H.A., Ngo Dingom, M.A., Dohbit, J.S., Ebong, C.E. and Foumane, P. (2021) Materno-Foetal Morbidity in the Second Stage of Labour: A Cohort Study in Primiparous Women in Yaounde. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11, 1725-1734. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2021.1112161</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.114031-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abalos, E., Oladapo, O.T., Chamillard, M., Díaz, V., Pasquale, J., Bonet, M., Souza, J.P. and Gülmezoglu, A.M. (2018) Duration of Spontaneous Labour in ‘Low-Risk’ Women with ‘Normal’ Perinatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 223, 123-132.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.02.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hutchison, J., Mahdy, H. and Hutchison, J. (2021) Stages of Labor. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey, A.B., Cahill, A.G., Guise, J.M. and Rouse, D.J. (2014) Safe Prevention of the Primary Cesarean Delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 210, 179-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hasegawa, J., Farina, A., Turchi, G., Hasegawa, Y., Zanello, M. and Baroncini, S. (2013) Effects of Epidural Analgesia on Labor Length, Instrumental Delivery, and Neonatal Short-Term Outcome. Journal of Anesthesia, 27, 43-47.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1480-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rouse, D.J., Weiner, S.J., Bloom, S.L., Varner, M.W., Spong, C.Y., Ramin, S.M., Caritis, S.N., Peaceman, A.M., Sorokin, Y., Sciscione, A., Carpenter, M.W., Mercer, B.M., Thorp Jr., J.M., Malone, F.D., Harper, M., Iams, J.D., Anderson, G.D. and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (2009) Second-Stage Labor Duration in Nulliparous Women: Relationship to Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 201, 357.e1-357.e7.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Foumane, P., Dohbit, J.S., Meka, E.N., Nkada, M., Minkandé, J.Z. and Mboudou, E. (2015) Etiologies of Maternal Mortality in the Yaounde Gynaeco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital: A Series of 58 Deaths. Health Sciences and Diseases, 16, 1-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nana, P., Essiben, F., Sama, J., Koh Koh, E., Lifanji, M., Eko, F, Fouedjio, J., Esiene, A. and Mbu, R. (2016) Epidemiologic Profile of Maternal Deaths in Two Referral Hospitals in Cameroon. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6, 365-372.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2016.66047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zipori, Y., Grunwald, O., Ginsberg, Y., Beloosesky, R. and Weiner, Z. (2019) The Impact of Extending the Second Stage of Labor to Prevent Primary Cesarean Delivery on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 220, 191.e1-191.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sendeku, F.W., Azeze, G.G. and Fenta, S.L. (2020) Perinatal Asphyxia and Its Associated Factors in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Pediatrics, 20, Article No. 135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02039-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mah-Mungyeh, E., Chiabi, A., Tchokoteu, F.L., Nguefack, S., Bogne J.B., Siyou, H.H., Soh, F.F., Enoh, J., Mbonda, E. and Tchokoteu, P.F. (2014) Neonatal Mortality in a Referral Hospital in Cameroon over a Seven-Year Period: Trends, Associated Factors and Causes. African Health Sciences, 14, 517-525.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v14i3.4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chiabi, A., Nguefack, S., Mah, E., Nodem, S., Mbuagbaw, L., Mbonda, E., Tchokoteu, P.F. and Doh, A.S. (2013) Risk Factors for Birth Asphyxia in an Urban Health Facility in Cameroon. Iranian Journal of Child Neurology, 7, 46-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmed, R., Mosa, H., Sultan, M., Helill, S.E., Assefa, B., Abdu, M., Ahmed, U., Abose, S., Nuramo, A., Alemu, A., Demelash, M. and Delil, R. (2021) Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Birth Asphyxia among Neonates Delivered in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE, 16, Article ID: e0255488.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255488</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pérez, M., Hernández Garre, J.M. and Pérez, P.E. (2021) Analysis of Factors Associated with Variability and Acidosis of the Umbilical Artery pH at Birth. Frontiers in pediatrics, 9, Article ID: 650555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.650555</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kune, G., Oljira, H., Wakgari, N., Zerihun, E. and Aboma, M. (2021) Determinants of Birth Asphyxia among Newborns Delivered in Public Hospitals of West Shoa Zone, Central Ethiopia: A Case-Control Study. PLoS ONE, 16, Article ID: e0248504.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248504</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tefera, M., Assefa, N., Roba, K.T. and Gedefa, L. (2021) Adverse Neonatal Outcome are More Common among Babies Born by Cesarean Section than Naturally Born Babies at Public Hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia: A Comparative Prospective Follow-Up Study at Eastern Ethiopia. Global Pediatric Health, 8, Article ID: 2333794X211018350.  
https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X211018350</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miltra, S. and Rennie, J. (2017) Neonatal Jaundice: Aetiology, Diagnostic and Treatment. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 78, 699-704. 
https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2017.78.12.699</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Altman, M.R. and Lydon-Rochelle, M.T. (2006) Prolonged Second Stage of Labor and Risk of Adverse Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Birth, 33, 315-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00129.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gerber, S., Vial, Y. and Hohlfeld, P. (1999) Maternal and Neonatal Prognosis after a Prolonged Second Stage of Labor. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 28, 145-150.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naime-Alix, A.F., Fourquet, F., Sigue, D., Potin, J., Descriaud, C. and Perrotin, F. (2008) How Long Can We Wait at Full Dilatation. A Study of Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity Related to the Duration of the Second Stage of Labour in Nulliparous Women. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 37, 268-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.12.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moon, J.M., Smith, C.V. and Rayburn, W.F. (1990) Perinatal Outcome after a Prolonged Second Stage of Labor. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 35, 229-231.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names> W.R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1977</year>)<article-title>Influence of the Duration of Second Stage Labor on Perinatal Outcome and Puerperal Morbidity</article-title><source> Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology</source><volume> 49</volume>,<fpage> 266</fpage>-<lpage>269</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Allen, V.M., Baskett, T.F., O’Connell, C.M., McKeen, D. and Allen, A.C. (2009) Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes with Increasing Duration of the Second Stage of Labor. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 113, 1248-1258.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a722d6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le Ray, C., Audibert, F., Goffinet, F. and Fraser, W. (2009) When to Stop Pushing: Effects of Duration of Second-Stage Expulsion Efforts on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Nulliparous Women with Epidural Analgesia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 201, 361.e1-361.e7.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheng, Y.W., Hopkins, L.M. and Caughey, A.B. (2004) How Long Is Too Long: Does a Prolonged Second Stage of Labor in Nulliparous Women affect Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 191, 933-938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heng, Y.W., Hopkins, L.M., Laros Jr., R.K. and Caughey, A.B. (2007) Duration of the Second Stage of Labor in Multiparous Women: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 196, 585.e1-585.e6.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Infante-Torres, N., Molina-Alarcón, M., Arias-Arias, A., Rodríguez-Almagro, J. and Hernández-Martínez, A. (2020) Relationship between Prolonged Second Stage of Labor and Short-Term Neonatal Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, Article No. 7762. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217762</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laughon, S.K., Berghella, V., Reddy, U.M., Sundaram, R., Lu, Z. and Hoffman, M.K. (2014) Neonatal and Maternal Outcomes with Prolonged Second Stage of Labor. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 124, 57-67.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000278</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel (2010) National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Vaginal Birth after Cesarean: New Insights. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 115, 1279-1295.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e459e5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gimovsky, A.C. and Berghella, V. (2016) Randomized Controlled Trial of Prolonged Second Stage: Extending the Time Limit vs Usual Guidelines. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 214, 361.e1-361.e6.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.114031-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grantz, K.L., Sundaram, R., Ma, L., Hinkle, S., Berghella, V., Hoffman, M.K. and Reddy, U.M. (2018) Reassessing the Duration of the Second Stage of Labor in Relation to Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 131, 345-353.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002431</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>