<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Environmental Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-2197</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2021.1212069</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEP-113977</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Influence of Land Use and Fish Farming on the Contents of Ca&lt;sup&gt;2+&lt;/sup&gt;, Mg&lt;sup&gt;2+&lt;/sup&gt;, K&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; and Na&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; in Pond and Reservoir Ecosystems in an Agricultural Small Watershed, China
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jiaogen</surname><given-names>Zhou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Caiyun</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Huaiyin Normal University, Huaian, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Jiangsu Provincial Engineering Research Center for Intelligent Monitoring and Ecological Management of Pond and Reservoir Water Environment, Huaian, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1174</fpage><lpage>1184</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  It is not understood well that how the effects of land use and fish farming on the contents of alkali metals (Ca
  <sup>2+</sup>, Mg
  <sup>2+</sup>, K
  <sup>+</sup> and Na
  <sup>+</sup>) in small water bodies of pond and reservoir ecosystems at the watershed scale. In this study, the concentrations of Ca
  <sup>2+</sup>, Mg
  <sup>2+</sup>, K
  <sup>+</sup> and Na
  <sup>+</sup> in water bodies were measured for 103 ponds and reservoirs used as fish farming or surrounded by different agricultural land use types in the subtropical hilly watershed of Jinjing (105 km
  <sup>2</sup>), China. The two important environmental factors of fishing farming and agricultural land use influenced the spatial variation the contents of alkali metals. The ponds and reservoirs in residential area had significantly higher concentrations of Ca
  <sup>2+</sup> and Na
  <sup>+</sup> than those with other land use types, reflecting the influence of domestic wastewater. Compared with those of natural ponds with non-fish farming, no significant increase of alkali metal contents occurred in fish farming ponds, due to the regular cleaning of ponds by farmers. However, the effect of fish culture on alkali metal contents was still supported indirectly by the fact that the alkali metal contents significantly correlated with nitrate contents in fish farming ponds and but high related with that of DIP in natural ponds. The suitability assessment for irrigation on the pond water indicated that almost all of ponds were suitable for irrigation except some ponds surrounded by residential area and tea plantation. Generally, our results demonstrated that fish farming and agricultural land use affected the contents of alkali metals in ponds and reservoirs. The agricultural water irrigation would be with caution from the ponds with tea plantation and residential area in the subtropical hilly watershed.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Land Use</kwd><kwd> Alkali Metals</kwd><kwd> Fish Farming</kwd><kwd> Agricultural Small Watershed</kwd><kwd> Pond and Reservoir</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Ponds and reservoirs are generally small surface depressions that hold still and shallow water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref2">2</xref>]. The global number of small ponds (&lt;0.001 km<sup>2</sup>) is estimated to be 5.47 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> - 3.2 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup>, with great uncertainty owing to failure to be detected by traditional satellite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref3">3</xref>]. Thus, the importance of ponds has been ignored in the ecosystems. In recent years, the ecological function of ponds for ecosystems and climate change has gained more and more attention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref5">5</xref>]. Farming ponds serve as ecological functions of hydrological regulation, pollution mitigation, biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic benefits in China [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref1">1</xref>].</p><p>Water quality of ponds and reservoirs is of great importance for aquaculture production and the growth and yield of crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref8">8</xref>]. In China, ponds and reservoirs provide irrigation water for 39% of the total agricultural land [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref1">1</xref>]. Thus, it is important to assess the irrigation suitability of pond water so as to make appropriate management decisions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref6">6</xref>]. Previous studies demonstrated that land use change and fish farming are important factors of affecting surface water quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref13">13</xref>]. Farming land was generally linked to excessive nutrients of surface water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref14">14</xref>]. Residential land use exerts a major effect on nutrients as well as alkali (earth) metals owing to animal and human excreta and the use of table salts, disinfectants, and food additives in daily life. Intensified fish breeding ponds posed serious threat to the surface water quality since a large portion of biogenic elements in the fodder was not utilized by fish. In addition, agrichemicals like quick lime, calcium hypochlorite and potassium permanganate were used as disinfectants to prevent fish disease, which led to high levels of major metal cations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>Many studies focus on the cycling of nutrients in ponds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref17">17</xref>], whereas much less attention is paid to alkali metal and alkaline earth metal cations such as Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup> and K<sup>+</sup>. These metal cations are necessary to maintain the normal function of living organisms. For example, the ions of Mg<sup>2+</sup> is involved in some enzyme-catalyzed reactions in the human body and also essential to chlorophyll synthesis in plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref18">18</xref>]. However, excessive contents of these cations in water bodies would have adverse impact on human health and ecosystem. For example, high levels of Na<sup>+</sup> in soil tend to displace Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup>, which would reduce the soil permeability and consequently affect the growth and yield of crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref21">21</xref>].</p><p>Ponds and reservoirs are widely distributed across southern China due to its abundant precipitation and agricultural demand, such as fish farming and paddy planting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref1">1</xref>]. To explore the impacts of land use and fish farming on the geochemical behaviors of alkali (earth) metals, we determined the concentrations of alkali metals (Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup> and K<sup>+</sup>) of water bodies from 103 ponds under the influence of different land use and/or used for fish farming in southern China. The suitability of pond water for irrigation was finally assessed to the help farmers and policy-makers make related management strategies to better play valuable role of ponds.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The headwater watershed of Jinjing (105 km<sup>2</sup>) was selected as the study area in a hilly subtropical region of the Hunan Province, China. The annual precipitation in the study area ranges from 1200 to 1500 mm, and the elevation ranges from 56 m to 434.8 m. The land use in the study area is dominated by three major types, namely forest, paddy fields, and tea plantations, which account for 58.5%, 31.6%, and 4.3% of the total area, respectively. 5.6% of the remaining areas are waters and residential ones. In areas like this, agricultural products and aquaculture are generally the main sources of income for farmers. In the study area, there are approximately 2010 ponds with a density of 20 ponds per km<sup>2</sup>, and more than 60% of these are used for aquaculture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref22">22</xref>]. In our study, 103 ponds and reservoirs were randomly selected to observe the alkali metal contents of the pond water bodies</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Water Sample Collection and Analysis</title><p>The water samples were collected below the surface of 30 - 50 cm in July 2019 from 103 ponds and reservoirs with different land use (32 for forest, 10 for tea plantation, 22 for farmland, 25 for residential area and 14 for mixed area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The 60 ponds are used for fish farming. The remaining 43 ponds are natural ponds without fish farming. All water samples were filtered through 0.45 μm membrane filters to Remove non-dissolved solid particulate matter within 24h after sampling and stored at −20˚C until analysis. The concentrations of alkali (earth) metals (Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup> and K<sup>+</sup>) were measured by inductively-coupled optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, 720-ES, USA) with an error of ≤5%. Water samples were transported to the laboratory where various N and P fractions, such as total nitrogen (TN), ammonium (NH4-N), nitrate (NO3-N), particulate nitrogen (PN), total phosphorus (TP), and particulate phosphorus (PP), were determined. The alkaline potassium persulfate digestion-UV spectrophotometric method was used to measure the contents of N fractions, and sulfuric/perchloric acid digestion-spectrophotometric method for ones of P fractions.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Statistical Description of Alkali Metal Contents</title><p>In order to examine the influence of human activities, the data of alkali metals</p><p>concentrations was classified into two groups. One group was used as natural ponds versus fish farming ponds. The other one was for natural ponds surrounded by the different land use types (tea plantation, residential area, forest and agricultural land). High variability of the concentrations of Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup> and K<sup>+</sup> occurred in water bodies of ponds, with the corresponding average values of 12.00 &#177; 5.68 mg&#183;L<sup>−1</sup>, 10.61 &#177; 6.55 mg&#183;L<sup>−1</sup>, 2.47 &#177; 1.05 mg&#183;L<sup>−1</sup> and 5.44 &#177; 2.87 mg&#183;L<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Fish farming ponds increased the contents of each of the four alkali metals than the natural ponds, but the increase was not all significant (P &gt; 0.05). The effect of land use types on each of the alkali metal contents varied considerably. There were not significant differences of K<sup>+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> levels among the land use types of tea plantation, residential area, forest and agricultural land. In contrast, the ponds had higher concentrations of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup> in residential land than those with other land use types.</p><p>In summary, the ponds in residential area had significantly higher Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+ </sup>concentrations. Many studies revealed that increase in Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup> reflected the influence of domestic and industrial wastes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref25">25</xref>]. Domestic wastewater is characterized by high Na<sup>+</sup> contents, which resulted mainly from the animal and human excreta as well as the use of table salts, disinfectants, and food additives. Thus, the higher Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup> concentrations of ponds in residential area indicated the impact of domestic wastewater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref24">24</xref>]. Fish farming ponds were expected to show significantly higher contents of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup>, because the disinfectants of quick lime, calcium hypochlorite, potassium permanganate and salt, were used to prevent fish disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref9">9</xref>]. However, the Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup> contents were not consistent with the above hypothesis in the study watershed. One reason might be related to regular clearing of ponds by fishermen. In our study area, the management practices that fishman often change pond water, effectively reduced the accumulation of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup></p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Impacts of Anthropogenic Activities on Geochemical Behavior of Alkali Elements</title><p>Although the pool of alkali metals did not show significant variations, the geochemical behaviors could be altered due to the changes in redox conditions and fishing disturbance. Thus, the correlation matrix analyses were used to explore the response of geochemical behaviors of alkali elements to the different human activities.</p><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Impacts of Fish Farming</title><p>Quick lime and salt are commonly used as disinfectants in fishponds to prevent fish disease. Moreover, the feeding stuff is thought to be a major contributor to increase in nitrogen and phosphorus of fishponds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref9">9</xref>]. These kinds of fishing practice might affect the geochemical behavior of alkali metals. To study the influence of fishing practices on alkali elements, the correlation of alkali elements and different N and P components was presented in the context of forest land use with fish farming ponds vs. natural ponds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Pearson’s correlation coefficient between alkali elements and nutrient elements in the context of forest land use</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DOC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO 3 −</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NH 4 +</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TN</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DIP</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.693<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.704<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.516<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.281</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.433<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.042</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.079</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.114</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.830<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.146</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.039</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.049</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.115</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.776<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.540</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.544<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.694<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.168</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.372</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.073</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.263</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.916<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.674<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.897<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.381</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.561<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.476<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.134</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DOC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.610</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.698<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.449</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.560<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.695<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.706<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.717<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.635<sup>**</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO 3 −</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.704<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.456</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.278</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.391</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.074</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.068</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NH 4 +</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.529</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.704<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.774<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.263</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.646</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.866<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.632<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.666<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.502<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.502</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.276</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.614</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.722<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.376</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.588</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.960<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.763<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.747<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.713<sup>**</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.487</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.385</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.484</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.589</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.531</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.478</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.779<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.910<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.952<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.720<sup>**</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.646</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.331</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.766<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.775<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.404</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.777<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.869<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.884<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.840<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.675<sup>**</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DIP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.746<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.587</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.736<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.864<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.654</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.488</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.865<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.891<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.838<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.865<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The right upper part and left lower part represent fish farming ponds and natural ponds, respectively. **significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed), *significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).</p><p>In the natural ponds, the alkali elements were also positively correlated with dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP), like Ca<sup>2+</sup>-DIP (r = 0.75), Mg<sup>2+</sup>-DIP (r = 0.74) and Na<sup>+</sup>-DIP (r = 0.86), indicating the existence of alkali metal phosphates, for example CaHPO<sub>4</sub>, Ca(H<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> and NaH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>. These kinds of phosphate are common in the soil solutes, suggesting the terrestrial origins of alkali metals caused by the surface runoff to the natural ponds. In contrast, alkali elements did not show significant correlation with phosphorus in the fish farming ponds, like Ca<sup>2+</sup>-DIP (r = 0.11), Mg<sup>2+</sup>-DIP (r = 0.26) and Na<sup>+</sup>-DIP (r = 0.13). The significant positive correlation was observed between alkali metals and nitrogen components, like Ca 2 + -NO 3 − (r = 0.52), Mg 2 + -NO 3 − (r = 0.69) and Na + -NO 3 − (r = 0.48), indicating the existence of nitrate of alkali metals. As previous studies indicated, the nitrogen in the fishponds was mainly derived from feeding stuff [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref9">9</xref>]. Hence, the positive correlation of alkali metals and nitrogen in the fishponds suggested the influence of fishing practices on the geochemical behaviors of alkali metals.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Impacts of Land Use</title><p>Previous studies indicated that land use was an important factor of water chemistry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref14">14</xref>]. For example, agricultural land led to increase in K<sup>+</sup>, nitrogen and phosphorus. Rivers have higher Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup> nitrogen and phosphorus in residential and industrial areas. To study the influence of land use types on alkali elements, the correlation of alkali elements with N and P commenting the ponds without fish farming (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). In residential area, the significant positive correlation was observed among Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup>, like Ca<sup>2+</sup>-Na<sup>+</sup> (r = 0.78) and Mg<sup>2+</sup>-Na<sup>+</sup> (r = 0.66), suggesting a common origin from domestic wastewater combined with the significantly high contents of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup> in residential area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). In agricultural land, alkali metals showed weak correlation between each other, for example, Ca<sup>2+</sup>-Mg<sup>2+</sup> (r = 0.37), Ca<sup>2+</sup>-Na<sup>+</sup> (r = 0.57, p &gt; 0.05) and K<sup>+</sup>-Na<sup>+</sup> (r = 0.08). This suggested that the geochemical behavior of alkali metals might be altered by the agricultural activities like tillage, extensive usage of pesticides and fertilizers.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Suitability Assessment for Irrigation</title><p>The suitability of pond water for irrigation was assessed according to the three indexes of sodium absorption ratio (SAR), sodium percentage (Na%), magnesium hazard (MH), which were calculated as the following equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref26">26</xref>]:</p><p>SAR = Na + Ca 2 + + Mg 2 + 2 (1)</p><p>Na% = ( Na + + K + ) &#215; 100 Ca 2 + + Mg 2 + + Na + + K + (2)</p><p>MH = Mg 2 + &#215; 100 Ca 2 + + Mg 2 + (3)</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Pearson’s correlation coefficient between alkali elements and nutrient elements in the context of agricultural land and residential land</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DOC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO 3 −</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NH 4 +</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TN</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DIP</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.413</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.722**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.782**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.446</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.397</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.476</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.510</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.434</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.617*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.726*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.386</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.544</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.217</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.042</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.061</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.365</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.659*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.239</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.690**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.598*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.759**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.650*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.628*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.732**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.572</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.078</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.533</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.403</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.657*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.441</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.369</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.572*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DOC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.576</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.650*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.485</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.439</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.362</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.314</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.299</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO 3 −</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.381</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.253</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.091</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.474</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.707**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.480</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.519</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.562*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NH 4 +</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.706*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.499</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.648*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.860**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.952**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.926**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.906**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.253</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.134</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.750**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.082</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.619*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.549</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.967**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.825**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.779**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.865**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.064</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.607*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.362</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.763**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.872**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.813**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.986**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.965**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.066</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.651*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.179</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.404</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.638*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.941**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.937**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.911**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.934**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DIP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.499</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.081</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.735**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.860**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.801**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.764**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.860**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The right upper part and left lower part represent the ponds surrounded by residential and agricultural land, respectively.</p><p>where the concentrations of alkali metals are expressed in meq&#183;L<sup>−1</sup>.</p><p>High levels of Na<sup>+</sup> contents lead to displacement of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> in soil and affect soil structure, aeration and infiltration, which will cause a drop of crop yield [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref21">21</xref>]. SAR accounts for the effects of Na<sup>+</sup> and is usually used as an assessment index of water quality for irrigation, with high levels of SAR affecting the growth and yield of crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref20">20</xref>]. SAR can be classified into 3 categories as follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref20">20</xref>]: good (0 - 6 meq&#183;L<sup>−1</sup>), doubtful (6 - 9 meq&#183;L<sup>−1</sup>) and unsuitable (&gt;9 meq&#183;L<sup>−1</sup>). SAR in this study ranged from 0.08 to 0.87 meq&#183;L<sup>−1</sup>, which is much lower than the reference value unsuitable for irrigation. This indicated that the pond water was suitable for crops growth with respect to SAR.</p><p>Different from SAR, sodium percentage (Na%) incorporates the effects of Na<sup>+</sup> and K<sup>+</sup> since K<sup>+</sup> is reported to affect the concentration of exchangeable Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref27">27</xref>]. Na% can be classified into 5 categories as follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref26">26</xref>]: excellent (&lt;20%), good (20% - 40%), permissible (40% - 60%), doubtful (60% - 80%) and unsuitable (&gt;80%). Na% in this study varied from 13% to 78%, falling into the “Excellent” category to “Doubtful” category. In all, 38% of samples were marginally suitable for irrigation. Pond water in residential area had higher level of Na% than other land use types. Fishponds had higher Na% than those of natural ponds without fish.</p><p>The high levels of Mg<sup>2+</sup> have adverse effect on soil hydraulic properties when Mg<sup>2+</sup> is 50% larger than Ca<sup>2+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113977-ref27">27</xref>]. MH can be classified into 2 categories as follows: suitable (&lt;50 meq&#183;L<sup>−1</sup>) and unsuitable (&gt;50 meq&#183;L<sup>−1</sup>). In this study area, MH of pond water ranged from 9.91 to 57.91 meq&#183;L<sup>−1</sup>, with 5% of samples falling into “Unsuitable” category (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The highest MH value was located in ponds distributed in the tea plantation and forest land. Overall, most of the pond water is suitable for irrigation with respect to SAR, Na% and MH. However, some of ponds in residential area and tea gardens should be of concern when considering that ~40% of ponds were marginally suitable for irrigation in terms of Na% and ~5% of ponds was unsuitable in terms of MH.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>This study explored the impacts of fish farming and land use types on the contents of alkali (earth) metals (Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup>) for pond and reservoir ecosystems in a subtropical agricultural watershed, China. In the context of forest land, the fishponds have higher contents of alkali (earth) metals than natural ponds without fish, but the difference is not significant as expected since quick lime and salt were used as disinfectants in fishponds. As for land use, the ponds and reservoirs in residential area have significantly higher Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup> concentration than other land use types, reflecting the impact of domestic wastewater. The suitability of pond and reservoir water for irrigation was assessed using SAR, Na% and MH. Although most of pond and reservoir water bodies are suitable for irrigation, some pond water bodies in residential area and tea gardens should be paid attention since levels of Na% and MH were marginally suitable for irrigation.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Fund</title><p>This study is supported by National Natural Science Fund (41877009).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Zhou, J.G. and Zhang, C.Y. (2021) The Influence of Land Use and Fish Farming on the Contents of Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup> in Pond and Reservoir Ecosystems in an Agricultural Small Watershed, China. Journal of Environmental Protection, 12, 1174-1184. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2021.1212069</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.113977-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, W., He, B., Nover, D., Lu, H., Liu, J., Sun, W. and Chen, W. (2019) Farm Ponds in Southern China: Challenges and Solutions for Conserving a Neglected Wetland Ecosystem. Science of the Total Environment, 659, 1322-1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.394</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fu, B., Xu, P., Wang, Y., Yan, K. and Chaudhary, S. (2018) Assessment of the Ecosystem Services Provided by Ponds in Hilly Areas. The Science of the Total Environment, 642, 979-987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.138</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Holgerson, M.A. and Raymond, P.A. (2016) Large Contribution to Inland Water CO2 and CH4 Emissions from Very Small Ponds. Nature Geoscience, 9, 222-226. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2654</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Downing</surname><given-names> J.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Emerging Global Role of Small Lakes and Ponds: Little Things Mean a Lot</article-title><source> Limnetica</source><volume> 29</volume>,<fpage> 9</fpage>-<lpage>23</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Downing, J.A. and Duarte, C.M. (2009) Abundance and Size Distribution of Lakes, Ponds and Impoundments. In: Encyclopedia of Inland Waters, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370626-3.00025-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xie, Y., Wang, Z., Guo, X., Lakthan, S., Chen, S., Xiao, Z. and Alhaj Hamoud, Y. (2019) Effects of Different Irrigation Treatments on Aquaculture Purification and Soil Desalination of Paddy Fields. Water, 11, 1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071424</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naigaga, S., Boyd, C.E., Gaillard, P., Abdelrahman, H.A. and Molnar, J.J. (2017) Assessing the Reliability of Water-Test Kits for Use in Pond Aquaculture. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 48, 555-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12377</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yavuzcan Yildiz, H., Robaina, L., Pirhonen, J., Mente, E., Domínguez, D. and Parisi, G. (2017) Fish Welfare in Aquaponic Systems: Its Relation to Water Quality with an Emphasis on Feed and Faeces—A Review. Water, 9, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9010013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bian, W. (2013) Study on Pollution Load and Control of Aquaculture in Baiyangdian Lake. China University of Geosciences, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dunea, D., Bretcan, P., Tanislav, D., Serban, G., Teodorescu, R., Iordache, S., Petrescu, N. and Tuchiu, E. (2020) Evaluation of Water Quality in Ialomita River Basin in Relationship with Land Cover Patterns. Water, 12, 735. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030735</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vizza, C., Zwart, J.A., Jones, S.E., Tiegs, S.D. and Lamberti, G.A. (2017) Landscape Patterns Shape Wetland Pond Ecosystem Function from Glacial Headwaters to Ocean. Limnology and Oceanography, 62, S207-S221. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10575</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fraterrigo, J.M. and Downing, J.A. (2008) The Influence of Land Use on Lake Nutrients Varies with Watershed Transport Capacity. Ecosystems, 11, 1021-1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-008-9176-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bu, H., Meng, W., Zhang, Y. and Wan, J. (2014) Relationships between Land Use Patterns and Water Quality in the Taizi River Basin, China. Ecological Indicators, 41, 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, S., Gu, S., Tan, X. and Zhang, Q. (2009) Water Quality in the Upper Han River Basin, China: The Impacts of Land Use/Land Cover in Riparian Buffer Zone. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 165, 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.123</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fan, Y. (2009) Influence of High-Speed Urbanization on the Hydrochemical Characteristics of Beijing Area and the Preliminary Study on Beijing Water Safety Evaluation. Capital Normal University, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Porrello, S., Lenzi, M., Persia, E., Tomassetti, P. and Finoia, M.G. (2003) Reduction of Aquaculture Wastewater Eutrophication by Phytotreatment Ponds System. Aquaculture, 219, 515-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00656-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pouil, S., Samsudin, R., Slembrouck, J., Sihabuddin, A., Sundari, G., Khazaidan, K., Kristanto, A.H., Pantjara, B. and Caruso, D. (2019) Nutrient Budgets in a Small-Scale Freshwater Fish Pond System in Indonesia. Aquaculture, 504, 267-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.01.067</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fairchild, G.W. and Velinsky, D.J. (2006) Effects of Small Ponds on Stream Water Chemistry. Lake and Reservoir Management, 22, 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/07438140609354366</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khanoranga and Khalid, S. (2019) An Assessment of Groundwater Quality for Irrigation and Drinking Purposes around Brick Kilns in Three Districts of Balochistan Province, Pakistan, through Water Quality Index and Multivariate Statistical Approaches. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 197, 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2018.11.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pant, R.R., Zhang, F., Rehman, F.U., Wang, G., Ye, M., Zeng, C. and Tang, H. (2018) Spatio-Temporal Variations of Hydro-Geochemistry and Its Controlling Factors in the Gandaki River Basin, Central Himalaya Nepal. The Science of the Total Environment, 622-623, 770-782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.063</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdollahi, Z., Kavian, A., Sadeghi, S.H.R., Khosrovyan, A. and DelValls, A. (2019) Identifying Environmental Risk Associated with Anthropogenic Activities in Zanjanrud River, Iran, Using an Integrated Approach. Catena, 183, Article ID: 104156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104156</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, J.G., Wang, Y. and Lei, Q.L. (2020) Using Bioinformatics to Quantify the Variability and Diversity of Microbial Community Structure in Pond Ecosystems of a Subtropical Catchment. Current Bioinformatics, 15, 1178-1186. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574893615999200422120819</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feng, Z., Shi, Z., Su, B. and Xiao, D. (2019) Water Chemistry in the Primary Tributaries of Dianchi Lake and Effect on the Water Environment of Dianchi Lake. Journal of Hydroecology, 40, 18-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, A.K., Mahato, M.K., Neogi, B. and Singh, K.K. (2010) Quality Assessment of Mine Water in the Raniganj Coalfield Area, India. Mine Water and the Environment, 29, 248-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-010-0108-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vetrimurugan, E., Elango, L. and Rajmohan, N. (2013) Sources of Contaminants and Groundwater Quality in the Coastal Part of a River Delta. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 10, 473-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0138-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raghunath, H.M. (1987) Geochemical Survey and Water Quality. Groundwater Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi, 343-347.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113977-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, C.J., Oster, J.D. and Sposito, G. (2015) Potassium and Magnesium in Irrigation Water Quality Assessment. Agricultural Water Management, 157, 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.09.003</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>