<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2021.1112160</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-113970</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Risk Factors for Preterm Delivery in Asymptomatic Singleton Pregnant Women with a Sonographic Short Cervix
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Satoshi</surname><given-names>Yoneda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Noriko</surname><given-names>Yoneda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shigeru</surname><given-names>Saito</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1711</fpage><lpage>1724</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>21,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objectives: 
  Although an asymptomatic short cervix is a risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB), the risk factors for SPTB among those with short cervix remain unknown. We herein investigated risk factors for preterm delivery (PTD) at &lt;34 weeks of gestation in pregnant women with a short cervix. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective study. Seventy-three asymptomatic pregnant women with a sonographic short cervix (excluding visible bulging fetal membranes) were selected, and the relationship between clinical or biochemical risk factors and preterm delivery (PTD) at &lt;34 weeks was examined.<b> Results: </b>Thirteen cases (17.8%) had PTD at &lt;34 weeks. A univariate analysis showed that a history of SPTD, gestational weeks on admission, cervical length, cervical mucus interleukin (CM-IL)-8 and amniotic fluid interleukin (AF-IL)-8 in PTD at &lt;34 weeks significantly differed from those in delivery at ≥34 weeks (p &lt; 0.05, respectively). A multiple logistic regression analysis identified CM-IL-8 ≥ 803.5 ng/mL [21.3 (3.0 - 260), p = 0.002] and cervical length ≤15 mm [17.1 (1.9 - 517), p = 0.008] as independent risk factors for PTD at &lt;34 weeks.<b> Conclusions:</b> Evaluation for cervical inflammation may be necessary for appropriate treatment strategies in asymptomatic pregnant women with a short cervix. Cervical inflammation warrants further study.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Amniotic Fluid</kwd><kwd> Cervical Mucus</kwd><kwd> Interleukin-8</kwd><kwd> Preterm Delivery</kwd><kwd> Sonographic Short Cervix</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>A sonographic short cervix ≤25 mm in the second trimester of pregnancy is a pre-sign of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref1">1</xref>].<sup> </sup>Regarding the clinical characteristics of SPTB and its problems; 1) since it is just a sonographic sign, a short cervix is only detected in asymptomatic pregnant women using ultrasonography; 2) the positive predictive value of SPTB before 35 weeks was previously reported to be 17.8% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref1">1</xref>], however, the majority of pregnant women delivered after 36 weeks; 3) it may be a pre-sign of cervical ripening with bag formation of visible bulging fetal membranes (cervical insufficiency) without clinical symptoms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref3">3</xref>], but does not necessarily develop visible bag formation, it might be a pre-sign of preterm labor (PTL) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref4">4</xref>] or preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref5">5</xref>]; and 4) the etiology of a sonographic short cervix may be multifactorial [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref6">6</xref>], such as vaginal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref8">8</xref>], cervical [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref10">10</xref>], and intra-amniotic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref15">15</xref>] inflammation/infection, a history of cervical surgery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref16">16</xref>], low cervical collagen concentrations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref17">17</xref>], and uterine anomalies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref18">18</xref>]. Therefore, the individualized management of asymptomatic pregnant women with a short cervix is needed. However, further studies are needed to clarify which risk factors for SPTB are important.</p><p>Intra-amniotic inflammation/infection has been strongly implicated in SPTB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref21">21</xref>], and is more severe in the earlier gestational weeks of SPTB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref24">24</xref>]. The cause of intra-amniotic inflammation/infection is mainly considered to be an ascending bacterial infection from the vagina through the cervix into the uterine cavity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref25">25</xref>]. Therefore, a short cervix may be one of the conditions caused by vaginal, cervical, and/or intra-amniotic inflammation/infection. However, in clinical settings, it currently remains unclear which inflammation/infection is the most important risk factor for SPTB in asymptomatic pregnant women with a short cervix.</p><p>In our hospital, when a pregnant woman at risk of SPTB is hospitalized, clinical or chemical risk markers of SPTB, such as the preterm labor index (PLI) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref26">26</xref>], maternal body temperature, white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), cervical length, Nugent score of vaginal secretions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref27">27</xref>], fetal fibronectin (fFN) in vaginal secretions, cervical mucus interleukin (CM-IL)-8, amniotic fluid interleukin (AF-IL)-8 (amniocentesis was administered to asymptomatic pregnant women with a short cervix until March 2008), AF glucose, and AF granulocytes are measured. We previously identified PLI, AF-IL-8, AF glucose, and fFN in vaginal secretions as independent risk factors for PTD at &lt;34 weeks in preterm labor (PTL) patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref28">28</xref>].</p><p>In the present study, we retrospectively investigated which risk factors correlate with PTD at &lt;34 weeks of gestation in asymptomatic pregnant women with a short cervix.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials &amp; Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Population</title><p>In total, 378 pregnant women before 28 weeks of gestation at risk of SPTB were hospitalized at Toyama University Hospital between April 2000 and March 2008. We excluded patients with multiple pregnancies, fetal growth restriction (less than −1.5 S.D.), congenital fetal anomalies, an abnormal fetal karyotype, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, a history of cervical surgery, uterine anomalies, and steroid users. We also excluded patients with PTL and pPROM.</p><p>Cases in which bag formation of visible bulging membranes was detected in a digital speculum (Cuzco) examination were also excluded. In the present study, cervical insufficiency was defined as visible bulging fetal membranes from the cervix in asymptomatic pregnant women with or without a previous history of SPTB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref2">2</xref>]. And “asymptomatic” was defined as a pregnant woman who visited hospital for routine pregnancy check-up. Therefore, the study population was considered to be normal pregnant women without an evaluation by a sonographic examination.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Management of Asymptomatic Pregnant Women with a Short Cervix</title><p>Cervical length was routinely measured every 2 weeks between 20 and 28 weeks of gestation with or without clinical symptoms, such as genital bleeding. The length between the internal and external os was assessed by transvaginal ultrasonography.</p><p>When asymptomatic pregnant women with a sonographic short cervix were identified in the outpatient clinic, hospitalization for physical rest was recommended. Generally, hospitalization is an exaggerated management (overtreatment), however, our treatment policy was to perform cervical cerclage immediately, when the cervix is suddenly shorter. After hospitalization, we evaluated cervical length every day for first week, and one or two times per week after the first week. Cardiotocogram (CTG) monitoring was also performed one or two times per day. Management strategies, such as therapeutic cerclage (McDonald’s cerclage), and maintenance tocolysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref30">30</xref>] were carried out in each case at the discretion of the attending obstetricians. Vaginal progesterone was not administered because it was not covered by the national health insurance system of Japan. Patients were hospitalized from admission to 28 - 30 weeks of gestation. Cases without clinical symptoms, such as regular uterine contractions, were discharged from the hospital and managed in the outpatient clinic.</p><p>Transabdominal amniocentesis for research purpose was performed within 2 days of admission after informed written consent had been obtained. The Ethics Committee (No.187) of Toyama University Hospital approved amniocentesis for patients at risk of SPTB to evaluate the AF-IL-8 and infection. Intra-amniotic microbes were evaluated by culture system. Approximately 5 - 10 mL of amniotic fluid (AF) was obtained. Amniocentesis was only performed on asymptomatic pregnant women with a sonographic short cervix until March 2008 because of the rarity of asymptomatic cases with severe intra-amniotic inflammation and/or infection.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Study Procedures and Statistical Analysis</title><p>Demographic and clinical data [maternal age, nullipara, a history of SPTB, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), smoking during pregnancy, gestational weeks on admission, maternal body temperature, WBC, CRP, cervical length, Nugent score, fFN in vaginal secretions, CM-IL-8, AF-IL-8, AF-glucose, AF-WBC, AF-microbes, tocolysis, cerclage, gestational weeks at birth, neonatal birth weight, still birth, Apgar scores, and admission to the NICU] were collected and compared between delivery at &lt;34 weeks and ≥34 weeks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref31">31</xref>].</p><p>Risk factors associated with preterm delivery at &lt;34 weeks of gestation (PTD at &lt;34 weeks) were assessed using a univariate analysis, which was performed using the χ<sup>2</sup>-test or Mann-Whitney U test, where appropriate. Cut-off values for risk factors were analyzed using a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, and independent risk factors were investigated using a multiple regression logistic analysis. All analyses were performed using statistical analysis software (JMP, version 11.2.0; SAS Institute Inc., Tokyo, Japan). A p-value &lt; 0.05 was considered to be significant.</p><p>We also discussed the pathology and management strategy for asymptomatic pregnant women with a short cervix based on the results of this retrospective study.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Seventy-three asymptomatic pregnant women with a sonographic short cervix ≤25 mm were selected in the present study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), and 13 cases delivered at &lt;34 weeks (17.8%: 13/73)</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows a comparison of clinical characteristics between asymptomatic pregnant women with a sonographic short cervix with PTD at &lt;34 weeks and delivery at ≥34 weeks. A history of PTB (57.1%), CM-IL-8 [803.5 (26.9 - 2785.9) ng/mL], AF-IL-8 [6.4 (0.3 - 138) ng/mL], and tocolytis (100%) in PTD at &lt;34 weeks were significantly higher than those [15.8%, 154.8 (1.9 - 2229.5) ng/mL, 2.2 (0.1 - 30.8) ng/mL, and 60%, respectively] in Delivery at ≥34 weeks. On the other hand, gestational age on admission [21 (19 - 26) weeks] and cervical length on admission [13 (5 - 24) mm] in PTD at &lt;34 weeks was significantly lower than those [25 (16 - 28) weeks and 17 (5 - 25) mm, respectively] in Delivery at ≥34 weeks.</p><p>Gestational weeks on admission ≤23 weeks (AUC = 0.762), AF-IL-8 ≥2.4 ng/mL (AUC = 0.706), CM-IL-8 ≥803.5 ng/mL (AUC = 0.729), and cervical length ≤15 mm (AUC = 0.726) were cut-off values that correlated with PTD at &lt;34 weeks using the ROC curve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows independent risk factors for PTD at &lt;34 weeks identified by a multiple logistic regression analysis. CM-IL-8 ≥803.5 ng/mL [21.3 (3.0 - 260), p = 0.002] and CL on admission ≤15 mm [17.1 (1.9 - 517), p = 0.008] were independent risk factors.</p><p>Diagnostic values for predicting PTD at &lt;34 weeks were sensitivity of 53.8% and specificity of 93.3% for CM-IL-8 (≥803.5 ng/mL), and 76.9% and 63.3%, respectively, for CL on admission (≤15 mm) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Positive predictive values</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Clinical characteristics of asymptomatic pregnant women with sonographic short cervix between PTD at &lt; 34 weeks and Delivery ≥ 34 weeks of gestation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >PTD at &lt; 34 weeks (N = 13)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Delivery at ≥ 34 weeks (N = 60)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >(N = 73)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p -value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years old)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (27 - 40)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (20 - 39)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.171</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nullipara (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.1 (6/13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.7 (22/60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.524</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >History of SPTB (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.1 (4/7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8 (6/38)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prepregnancy BMI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.2 (17.4 - 34.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3 (17.0 - 35.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.820</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Smoking (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0/13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7 (4/60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.338</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GW on admission</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (19 - 26)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (16 - 28)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.005</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MBT (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.8 (35.9 - 37.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.9 (35.6 - 37.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.487</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WBC (/mm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8840 (4800 - 11,930)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9260 (4600 - 15,640)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.320</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CRP (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2 (0.1 - 0.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 (0.1 - 1.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.454</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL on admission (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (5 - 24)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (5 - 25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nugent score (points)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (0 - 8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0 - 9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.553</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >fFN in VS (ng/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 (4 - 145)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (0 - 873)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.133</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CM-IL-8 (ng/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >803.5 (26.9 - 2785.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154.8 (1.9 - 2229.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF-IL-8 (ng/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4 (0.3 - 138)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 (0.1 - 30.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.029</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF-glucose (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (19 - 84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (10 - 127)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.366</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF-WBC (/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6000 (800 - 49,000)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5000 (500 - 100,000)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.302</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF-microbes by culture (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7 (1/13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7 (1/60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.227</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tocolysis (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 (13/13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.0 (36/60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.005</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cerclage (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.2 (9/13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.3 (32/60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.295</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GW at birth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (21 - 33)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37 (34 - 40)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >neonatal BW (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1158 (326 - 2249)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2966 (1916 - 3680)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Still birth (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.1 (3/13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0/60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >APS (1 min) (points)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (3 - 8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (5 - 9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >APS (5 min) (points)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (5 - 9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (9 - 10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Admission at NICU (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 (10/10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0 (6/60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>PTD; preterm delivery, SPTB; spontaneous preterm birth, BMI; body mass index, GW; gestational weeks, MBT; maternal body temprature, WBC; white blood cell count, CRP; C-reactive protein, CL; cervical length, fFN; fetal fibronectin, VS; vaginal secretions, CM; cervical mucus, IL; interleukin, AF; amniotic fluid, BW; body weight, APS; Apgar score, NICU; neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p>were 63.6% for CM-IL-8 and 31.2% for CL on admission. On the other hand, negative predictive values were 90.3% for CM-IL-8 and 92.7% for CL on admission.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Independent risk factors for PTD at &lt;34 weeks of gestation by multiple logistic regression analysis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Factor</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Odd Ratio</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >95% CI</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >(N = 73)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p -value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >History of PTB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76 - 400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.079</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GW on admission (≤23 weeks)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92 - 57.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.062</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AF-IL-8 (≥2.4 ng/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90 - 61.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.065</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CM-IL-8 (≥803.5 ng/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0 - 260</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL on admission (≤15 mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9 - 517</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>PTD; preterm delivery, PTB; preterm birth, CI; confidence interval, GW; geatational weeks, AF; amniotic fluid, IL; interleukin, CM; cervical mucus, CL; cervical length.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Diagnostic values for predicting PTD at &lt; 34 weeks of gestation (n = 73)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sensitivity (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Specificity (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PPV (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NPV (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CM-IL-8 (≥803.5 ng/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.8 (7/13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.3 (56/60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.6 (7/11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.3 (56/62)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL on admission (≤15 mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.9 (10/13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.3 (38/60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.2 (10/32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.7 (38/41)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CM-IL-8 &amp; CL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.5 (5/13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.0 (57/60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.5 (5/8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.7 (57/65)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>PTD; preterm delivery, PPV; positive predictive value, NPV; negative predictive value, CM; cervical mucus, IL; interleukin, CL; cervical length.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Clinical Significance</title><p>We generally examine cervical length using ultrasonography in the outpatient clinic between 22 to 24 weeks of gestation because a short cervix is a pre-sign of SPTB. The early detection of this pre-sign before the appearance of clinical symptoms, such as cervical insufficiency (visible bag formation), PTL, or pPROM, looks to be beneficial.</p><p>Management strategies for asymptomatic pregnant women with a short cervix include the administration of progesterone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref34">34</xref>], therapeutic cerclage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref37">37</xref>], a vaginal pessary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref40">40</xref>]. However, these treatment strategies had not been administered according to each etiology. The strategy based on the pathological condition may improve the prognosis. On the other hand, previous studies pointed out that the pregnant women with a short cervix had delivered at term without treatment in most cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref43">43</xref>]. Therefore, observation without treatment would be better choice in some cases.</p><p>In the present study, the following 5 risk factors for PTD at &lt;34 weeks were identified in the univariable analysis; a history of SPTB, gestational weeks on admission ≤23 weeks, AF-IL-8 ≥2.4 ng/mL, CM-IL-8 ≥803.5 ng/mL, and cervical length ≤15 mm. Therefore, management strategies according to each risk factor are possible. In particular, CM-IL-8 and cervical length were identified as independent risk factors.</p><p>Although there was a significant difference in amniotic inflammation by univariable analysis, the level of inflammation was extremely low [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref24">24</xref>]. It is clinically important that the intra-uterine environment is still maintained in asymptomatic pregnant women with short cervix.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Cervical Inflammation</title><p>Based on our previous findings, CM-IL-8 ≥803.5 ng/mL indicates severe cervical inflammation (cervicitis &gt;360 ng/mL) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref44">44</xref>], which may be strongly associated with SPTB. In the pathology of asymptomatic short cervical cases, cervical inflammation may play a crucial role in shortening mechanisms.</p><p>Progesterone exerts anti-inflammatory effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref46">46</xref>], and natural progesterone is often used in the treatment of asymptomatic short cervical cases to prevent SPTB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref47">47</xref>]. Therefore, the present results may indicate its efficacy against local severe inflammation in the cervix.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Short Cervix ≤15 mm</title><p>Decreases in cervical length may increase the risk of SPTB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref48">48</xref>]. In the present study, cervical length ≤15 mm was identified as an independent risk factor for PTD at &lt;34 weeks with or without a history of SPTB. Previous studies reported a correlation between a short cervix ≤15 mm and SPTB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref50">50</xref>], which is consistent with the present results.</p><p>The efficacy of therapeutic cerclage has been suggested for patients with a short cervix ≤15 mm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref51">51</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref53">53</xref>]. Therapeutic cerclage was recently shown to significantly reduce PTD at &lt;35 weeks of gestation in patients with a short cervix &lt;10 mm and no history of SPTB, who are at a high risk of SPTB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref37">37</xref>]. Considering these reports and our results, the therapeutic cerclage is not necessary for cases with cervical length more than 16 mm.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Strengths and Limitations of the Present Study</title><p>The present study had the following strengths: 1) Although the etiology of or risk factors for SPTB in asymptomatic short cervical pregnant women have been extensively examined, there is no report that which factors associated with SPTB is more important by a multiple regression analysis. 2) This is the first study to clarify whether cervical or intra-amniotic inflammation is more important using inflammatory markers, such as IL-8. 3) The present results advocate the clinical concept that manages patients with a short cervix according to each individual cause. Therefore, the present results may lead to be a new logical and novel management strategy. For example, hospitalization, progesterone, and cerclage may not be necessary in asymptomatic short cervical cases at a low risk of SPTD. We previously reported that elevated CM-IL-8 in cerclage cases was an indicator of SPTD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref35">35</xref>].</p><p>The present study had the following limitations: 1) The number of patients examined was small (73 cases), the 95% confidence interval (CI) was larger, and clinical data were gathered from a single hospital; however, further studies with a large number of patients will increase its significance. 2) Although severe cervicitis is significant risk factor for PTD at &lt;34 weeks, the cause of cervicitis was not identified in the present study. Vaginal microbes, such as bacteria and/or Ureaplasma/Mycoplasma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref54">54</xref>], which have recently been reported to correlate with SPTB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113970-ref56">56</xref>], may contribute to severe cervicitis; however, the Nugent score was not related in this study. 3) Although the rate of therapeutic cerclage for a short cervix was high, a significant difference was not observed between the two groups (PTD at &lt;34 weeks vs. Delivery at ≥34 weeks).</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Proposals for Future Research</title><p>In the management of asymptomatic pregnant woman with a short cervix, we propose the selection of suitable strategies based on each etiology. Therefore, the mechanisms contributing to cervical shortening without clinical symptoms need to be elucidated. Furthermore, large clinical studies, such as randomized controlled trials, are needed to clarify the ascending mechanisms of vaginal, cervical, and intra-amniotic inflammation and/or infection.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Risk factors for SPTD at &lt;34 weeks in asymptomatic pregnant women with a sonographic short cervix include a history of SPTD, a shorter cervix (≤15 mm), and cervical and/or amniotic inflammation. However, the value of AF-IL-8 was very low in most cases. Appropriate treatment strategies need to be planned according to each risk factor. Especially, severe cervical inflammation and shorter cervix (≤15 mm) were independent risk factors. It is clinically important that the inflammation in cervix rather than in amnion was more significant. Further studies are also needed to assess cervical inflammation.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank the mothers who participated in this study. This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (JSPS KAKENHI No. 21K09535).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Date Availability Statement</title><p>The data used to support the present results are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Authors’ Contributions</title><p>Satoshi Yoneda conceptualized the study design. Satoshi Yoneda and Noriko Yoneda gathered and statistically analyzed clinical data. Satoshi Yoneda wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Shigeru Saito provided further technical and editorial inputs. The manuscript was reviewed and approved by all authors before its submission.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>There is no financial or other relationship that may lead to a conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Yoneda, S., Yoneda, N. and Saito, S. (2021) Risk Factors for Preterm Delivery in Asymptomatic Singleton Pregnant Women with a Sonographic Short Cervix. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11, 1711-1724. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2021.1112160</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.113970-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iams, J.D., Goldenberg, R.L., Meis, P.J., Mercer, B.M., Moawad, A., et al. (1996) The Length of the Cervix and the Risk of Spontaneous Premature Delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. New England Journal of Medicine, 334, 567-572.  
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199602293340904</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2014) Practice Bulletin No.142: Cerclage for the Management of Cervical Insufficiency. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 123, 372-379. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000443276.68274.cc</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lidegaard, O. (1994) Cervical Incompetence and Cerclage in Denmark 1980-1990. A Register Based Epidemiological Survey. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 73, 35-38. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349409013390</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Romero, R., Dey, S.K. and Fisher, S.J. (2014) Preterm Labor: One Syndrome, Many Causes. Science, 345, 760-765. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251816</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tchirikov, M., Schlabritz-Loutsevitch, N., Maher, J., Buchmann, J., Naberezhnev, Y., Winarno, A.S., et al. (2018) Mid-Trimester Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes (PPROM): Etiology, Diagnosis, Classification, International Recommendations of Treatment Options and Outcome. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 46, 465-488.  
https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2017-0027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guimaraes Filho, H.A., Araujo Junior, E., Pires, C.R., Nardozza, L.M. and Moron, A.F. (2013) Short Cervix Syndrome: Current Knowledge from Etiology to the Control. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 287, 621-628. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2740-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sendag, F., Kazandi, M., Akercan, F., Kazandi, A.C., Karadadas, N. and Sagol, S. (2010) Vaginal Fluid pH, Cervicovaginitis and Cervical Length in Pregnancy. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 37, 127-130.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kindinger, L.M., Bennett, P.R., Lee, Y.S., Marchesi, J.R., Smith, A., Cacciatore, S., et al. (2017) The Interaction between Vaginal Microbiota, Cervical Length, and Vaginal Progesterone Treatment for Preterm Birth Risk. Microbiome, 5, Article No. 6.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0223-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Choi, S.R., Hong, S.S., Kim, J. and Lee, K.Y. (2018) Neutrophil Elastase in Cervical Fluid in Women with Short Cervical Length. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 57, 407-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2018.04.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yoo, H.N., Park, K.H., Jung, E.Y., Kim, Y.M., Kook, S.Y. and Jeon, S.J. (2017) Non-Invasive Prediction of Preterm Birth in Women with Cervical Insufficiency or an Asymptomatic Short Cervix (≤25 mm) by Measurement of Biomarkers in the Cervicovaginal Fluid. PLoS ONE, 12, e0180878.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180878</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassan, S., Romero, R., Hendler, I., Gomez, R., Khalek, N., Espinoza, J., et al. (2006) A Sonographic Short Cervix as the Only Clinical Manifestation of Intra-Amniotic Infection. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 34, 13-19.  
https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2006.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tarca, A.L., Fitzgerald, W., Chaemsaithong, P., Xu, Z., Hassan, S.S., Grivel, J.-C., et al. (2017) The Cytokine Network in Women with an Asymptomatic Short Cervix and the Risk of Preterm Delivery. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 78, e12686. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12686</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kiefer, D., Keeler, S., Rust, O., Chow, S.S.W., Craig, M.E., Peltier, M.R., et al. (2012) Amniotic Fluid Inflammatory Score Is Associated with Pregnancy Outcome in Patients with Mid Trimester Short Cervix. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 206, 68.e1-68.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.08.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kiefer, D.G., Keeler, S.M., Rust, O.A., Wayock, C.P., Vintzileos, A.M. and Hanna, N. (2009) Is Midtrimester Short Cervix a Sign of Intraamniotic Inflammation? American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 200, 374.e1-374.e5.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vaisbuch, E., Hassan, S.S., Mazaki-Tovi, S., Nhan-Chang, C.-L., Pedro Kusanovic, J., Chaiworapongsa, T., et al. (2010) Patients with an Asymptomatic Short cervIx (≤15 mm) Have a High Rate of Subclinical Intra-Amniotic Inflammation: Implications for Patient Counseling. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 202, 433.e1-433.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boelig, R.C., Villani, M., Jiang, E., Orzechowski, K.M. and Berghella, V. (2018) Prior Uterine Evacuation and the Risk of Short Cervical Length: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 37, 1763-1769.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14529</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sundtoft, I., Langhoff-Roos, J., Sandager, P., Sommer, S. and Uldbjerg, N. (2017) Cervical Collagen Is Reduced in Non-Pregnant Women with a History of Cervical Insufficiency and a Short Cervix. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 96, 984-990. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crane, J.M. and Hutchens, D. (2008) Transvaginal Sonographic Measurement of Cervical Length to Predict Preterm Birth in Asymptomatic Women at Increased Risk: A Systematic Review. Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 31, 579-587.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goldenberg, R.L., Culhane, J.F., Iams, J.D. and Romero, R. (2008) Epidemiology and Causes of Preterm Birth, Lancet, 371, 75-84.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Purisch, S.E. and Gyamfi-Bannerman, C. (2017) Epidemiology of Preterm Birth. Seminars in Perinatology, 41, 387-391.  
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frey, H.A. and Klebanoff, M.A. (2016) The Epidemiology, Etiology, and Costs of Preterm Birth. Seminars in Fetal &amp; Neonatal Medicine, 21, 68-73.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2015.12.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Romero, R., Miranda, J., Chaiworapongsa, T., Korzeniewski, S.J., Chaemsaithong, P., Gotsch, F., et al. (2014) Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Sterile Intra-Amniotic Inflammation in Patients with Preterm Labor and Intact Membranes. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 72, 458-474.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12296</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lahra, M.M. and Jeffery, H.E. (2004) A Fetal Response to Chorioamnionitis Is Associated with Early Survival after Preterm Birth. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 190, 147-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.07.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yoneda, S., Shiozaki, A., Ito, M., Yoneda, N., Inada, K., Yonezawa, R., et al. (2015) Accurate Prediction of the Stage of Histological Chorioamnionitis before Delivery by Amniotic Fluid IL-8 Level. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 73, 568-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12360</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, L., Oza, S., Hogan, D., Perin, J., Rudan, I., Lawn, J.E., et al. (2015) Global, Regional, and National Causes of Child Mortality in 2000-13, with Projections to Inform Post-2015 Priorities: An Updated Systematic Analysis. Lancet, 385, 430-440.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sakai, M., Sasaki, Y., Yamagishi, N., Tanebe, K., Yoneda, S. and Saito, S. (2003) The Preterm Labor Index and Fetal Fibronectin for Prediction of Preterm Delivery with Intact Membranes. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 101, 123-128.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200301000-00024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nugent, R.P., Krohn, M.A. and Hillier, S.L. (1991) Reliability of Diagnosing Bacterial Vaginosis Is Improved by a Standardized Method of Gram Stain Interpretation. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 29, 297-301.  
https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.2.297-301.1991</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yoneda, S., Sakai, M., Sasaki, Y., Shiozaki, A., Hidaka, T. and Saito, S. (2007) Interleukin-8 and Glucose in Amniotic Fluid, Fetal Fibronectin in Vaginal Secretions and Preterm Labor Index Based on Clinical Variables Are Optimal Predictive Markers for Preterm Delivery in Patients with Intact Membranes. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 33, 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00474.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yoneda, S. (2020) Method to Evaluate Intravenous Maintenance Tocolysis for Preterm Labor. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 46, 2518-2525.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14484</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yoneda, S., Yoneda, N., Fukuta, K., Shima, T., Nakashima, A., Shiozaki, A., et al. (2018) In Which Preterm Labor-Patients Is Intravenous Maintenance Tocolysis Effective? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 44, 397-407.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13547</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kramer, M.S., Demissie, K., Yang, H., Platt, R.W., Sauvé, R. and Liston, R. (2000) The Contribution of Mild and Moderate Preterm Birth to Infant Mortality. Fetal and Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. JAMA, 284, 843-849. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.7.843</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fonseca, E.B., Celik, E., Parra, M., Singh, M. and Nicolaides, K.H., for the Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group (2007) Progesterone and the Risk of Preterm Birth among Women with a Short Cervix. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 462-469. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa067815</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Conde-Agudelo, A., Romero, R., Da Fonseca, E., O’Brien, J.M., Cetingoz, E., Creasy, G.W., et al. (2018) Vaginal Progesterone Is as Effective as Cervical Cerclage to Prevent Preterm Birth in Women with a Singleton Gestation, Previous SPTB, and a Short Cervix: Updated Indirect Comparison Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 219, 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Romero, R., Conde-Agudelo, A., Da Fonseca, E., O’Brien, J.M., Cetingoz, E., Creasy, G.W., et al. (2018) Vaginal Progesterone for Preventing Preterm Birth and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Singleton Gestations with a Short Cervix: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 218, 161-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.576</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alfirevic, Z., Stampalija, T. and Medley, N. (2017) Cervical Stitch (Cerclage) for Preventing Preterm Birth in Singleton Pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 6, Article No. CD008991.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Romero, R., Espinoza, J., Erez, O. and Hassan, S. (2006) The Role of Cervical Cerclage in Obstetric Practice: Can the Patient Who Could Benefit from This Procedure Be Identified? American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 194, 1-9.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.12.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berghella, V., Ciardulli, A., Rust, O.A., To, M., Otsuki, K., Althuisius, S., et al. (2017) Cerclage for Sonographic Short Cervix in Singleton Gestations without Prior Spontaneous Preterm Birth: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Using Individual Patient-Level Data. Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 50, 569-577. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17457</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nicolaides, K.H., Syngelaki, A., Poon, L.C., Picciarelli, G., Tul, N., Zamprakou, A., et al. (2016) A Randomized Trial of a Cervical Pessary to Prevent Preterm Singleton Birth. New England Journal of Medicine, 374, 1044-1052.  
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1511014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saccone, G., Maruotti, G.M., Giudicepietro, A., Martinelli, P., Italian Preterm Birth Prevention (IPP) Working Group (2017) Effect of Cervical Pessary on Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Women with Singleton Pregnancies and Short Cervical Length: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 318, 2317-2324.  
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.18956</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dugoff, L., Berghella, V., Sehdev, H., Mackeen, A.D., Goetzl, L. and Ludmir, J. (2018) Prevention of Preterm Birth with Pessary in Singletons (PoPPS): Randomized Controlled Trial. Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 51, 573-579.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18908</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Orzechowski, K.M., Boelig, R., Nicholas, S.S., Baxter, J. and Berghella, V. (2015) Is Universal Cervical Length Screening Indicated in Women with Prior Term Birth? American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 212, 234.e1-234.e5.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Facco, F.L. and Simhan, H.N. (2013) Short Ultrasonographic Cervical Length in Women with Low-Risk Obstetric History. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 122, 858-862.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a2dccd</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">van der Ven, J., van Os, M.A., Kazemier, B.M., Kleinrouweler, C.E., Verhoeven, C.J., de Miranda, E., et al. (2015) The Capacity of Mid-Pregnancy Cervical Length to Predict Preterm Birth in Low-Risk Women: A National Cohort Study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 94, 1223-1234.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12721</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sakai, M., Sasaki, Y., Yoneda, S., et al. (2004) Elevated Interleukin-8 in Cervical Mucus as an Indicator for Treatment to Prevent Premature Birth and Preterm, Pre-Labor Rupture of Membranes: A Prospective Study. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 51, 220-225.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0897.2004.00145.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hung, T.H., Chen, S.F., Wu, C.P., Li, M.J., Yeh, Y.L. and Hsieh, T.T. (2017) Micronized Progesterone Pretreatment Affects the Inflammatory Response of Human Gestational Tissues and the Cervix to Lipopolysaccharide Stimulation. Placenta, 57, 1-8.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2017.05.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yoshino, O., Osuga, Y., Hirota, Y., Koga, K., Hirata, T., Yano, T., et al. (2003) Endometrial Stromal Cells Undergoing Decidualization Down-Regulate Their Properties to Produce Proinflammatory Cytokines in Response to Interleukin-1 Beta via Reduced p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphorylation. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism, 88, 2236-2241.  
https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-021788</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Furcron, A.E., Romero, R., Plazyo, O., Unkel, R., Chaemsaithong, P., Mahajan, A., et al. (2015) Vaginal Progesterone, but Not 17α-Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate, Has Antiinflammatory Effects at the Murine Maternal-Fetal Interface. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 213, 846.e1-846.e19.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shiozaki, A., Yoneda, S., Nakabayashi, M., Takeda, Y., Takeda, S., Sugimura, M., et al. (2014) Multiple Pregnancy, Short Cervix, Part-Time Worker, Steroid Use, Low Educational Level and Male Fetus Are Risk Factors for Preterm Birth in Japan: A Multicenter, Prospective Study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 40, 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12120</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassan, S.S., Romero, R., Berry, S.M., Dang, K., Blackwell, S.C., Treadwell, M.C., et al. (2000) Patients with an Ultrasonographic Cervical Length &lt; or = 15 mm Have Nearly a 50% Risk of Early Spontaneous Preterm Delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 182, 1458-1467. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.106851</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heath, V.C., Daskalakis, G., Zagaliki, A., Carvalho, M. and Nicolaides, K.H. (2000) Cervicovaginal Fibronectin and Cervical Length at 23 Weeks of Gestation: Relative Risk of Early Preterm Delivery. BJOG, 107, 1276-1281.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11620.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Skupski, D.W., Lin, S.N., Reiss, J. and Eglinton, G.S. (2014) Extremely Short Cervix in the Second Trimester: Bed Rest or Modified Shirodkar Cerclage? Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 42, 55-59. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2013-0092</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Szychowski, J.M., Berghella, V., Owen, J., Hankins, G., Iams, J.D., Sheffield, J.S., et al. (2012) Cerclage for the Prevention of Preterm Birth in High Risk Women Receiving Intramuscular 17-α-Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal &amp; Neonatal Medicine, 25, 2686-2689.  
https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.717128</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berghella, V., Rafael, T.J., Szychowski, J.M., Rust, O.A. and Owen, J. (2011) Cerclage for Short Cervix on Ultrasonography in Women with Singleton Gestations and Previous Preterm Birth: A Meta-Analysis. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 117, 663-671.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820ca847</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luusk, M.J., Garden, F.L., Rawlinson, W.D., Naing, Z.W., Cumming, R.G. and Konecny, P. (2016) Cervicitis Aetiology and Case Definition: A Study in Australian Women Attending Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinics. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 92, 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2015-052332</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Capoccia, R., Greub, G. and Baud, D. (2013) Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 26, 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0b013e328360db58</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113970-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Breugelmans, M., Vancutsem, E., Naessens, A., Laubach, M. and Foulon, W. (2010) Association of Abnormal Vaginal Flora and Ureaplasma Species as Risk Factors for Preterm Birth: A Cohort Study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 89, 256-260. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016340903418769</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>