<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2021.1211085</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-113448</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Chemical Composition and Nutritional Evaluation of Cake Made with Flour Mixture of Pigeonpea and Rice
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ferlando</surname><given-names>Lima Santos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wagna</surname><given-names>Santos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bruna</surname><given-names>Machado</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Karina</surname><given-names>Fonseca</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Merian</surname><given-names>Oliveira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adriana</surname><given-names>Nascimento</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Federal University of Reconcavo da Bahia (UFRB), Cruz das Almas, Brazil</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>11</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1164</fpage><lpage>1176</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This study aimed to develop and characterize a cake based on a flour mixture 
  of pigeonpea and rice. Four cake formulations of different percentages of pigeonpea flour (PF) and Rice Flour (RF) (0% PF + 100% RF, 10% PF + 90% RF, 20% PF + 80% RF, 30% PF + 70% RF) were developed based on a traditional formulation. Microbiological, physicochemical and sensory evaluations 
  were performed. The tasters preferred the mix formulation containing 30% pigeonpea and 70% rice (p &lt; 0.05). This formulation presented adequate physicochemical and microbiological characteristics. The study also showed 90% acceptance and 70% purchase intention by the tasters. It is concluded that the use of a flour mixture of pigeonpea and rice allows an innovative, nutritious 
  product, with good acceptance and technological potential. This product meets the needs of the food industry, such as: 1) it is gluten-free; 2) contributes for 
  the adoption of healthy eating habits; 3) promotes family farming; and 4) 
  stimulates the consumption of regional vegetables that can be incorporated into school meals menus, rescuing the consumption habits of rice and beans 
  and eventually valuing the traditional Brazilian diet. It is worth noting the 
  low lipid, high fiber, iron and zinc content characteristic of the developed product.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Legumes</kwd><kwd> Sensory Evaluation</kwd><kwd> Food Technology</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Grains legumes are a group of food with great relevance in the national and international scenario due to their nutritional and socioeconomic value. In terms of variety, Brazil is the third producer of legumes worldwide, accounting for 12% of the world’s production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref1">1</xref>]. In Brazil, family farming is the main staple food supplier and plays a decisive role in food cultivation for the domestic market. According to the 2011 Agricultural Census, family farming is responsible for 83% of the production of beans consumed by the population of the state of Bahia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>The pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp) is a legume (family Fabaceae) brought from India to Brazil and Guianas, where it has gained the status of an important source of human food. It is popularly known as “guandu”, “guando”, “gandu”, “andu” or pigeon pea, depending on the region where it is cultivated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>From the nutritional point of view, this legume is a source of proteins, carbohydrates, vitamins and minerals, (calcium, iron, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, zinc and manganese). It contains considerable amounts of fiber and is rich in lysine, phenylalanine, valine, arginine, aspartic acid and glutamic acid; it is, however, deficient in methionine and cysteine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref4">4</xref>]. Pigeon pea also presents medicinal action against Sickle cell disease by inhibiting sickling of red blood cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is also a staple food in many countries and represents a source of vitamins, mainly of the B complex, fibers and minerals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref6">6</xref>]. Legumes are relatively low in protein, hence if consumed as the only source of protein, can lead to food deficiency. The combination of pigeonpea, rich in lysine and poor in sulfur amino acids (methionine and cysteine) with rice, deficient in lysine but rich in methionine, offers a supply of proteins of higher nutritional value, with a more suitable amino acids composition to human needs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>Thus, the incorporation of rice flour into recipes is an excellent strategy, adding functional characteristics to gluten-free products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref8">8</xref>]. One such food option is cake, which consumption and commercialization has been growing in Brazil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>It is worth noticing that, according to data from the Household Budget Survey (HBS) of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), between 2002 and 2009, there was a reduction of 40.5% in the participation of rice and of 26.4% of beans in the household diet of Brazilians [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref10">10</xref>]. The 2014 Food Guide for the Brazilian Population recommends a proportion of 2:1 in the daily consumption of rice and beans. This recommendation favors an ideal combination in terms of essential amino acids and acts to correct nutritional problems and to foster the traditional Brazilian diet, which is based on the combination of cereals and legumes (rice and beans), fruits and vegetables [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>Attentive to this reduction in the consumption of rice and beans by Brazilians, the present study developed a cake recipe with bean and rice flours and performed sensorial and physicochemical analyses of the product. The bean used is produced by family farms, thus valuing the traditional Brazilian diet.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sampling and Acquisition of Pigeonpea Flour (PF)</title><p>The grains of the legume Pigeonpea (immature seed) were obtained from family farmers of the city of Santo Ant&#244;nio de Jesus-Bahia. The grains were selected, washed and bleached in the Food Technology Laboratory at the University of Reconcavo da Bahia.</p><p>To obtain the flour, the pigeonpea grains were dried in an oven (Biopar, Porto Alegre, Brazil) at 50˚C for 30 h and ground in a food processor (Philips, S&#227;o Paulo, Brazil). The powder was then sieved using a 21 mm mesh, packed in plastic containers, and stored at 25˚C.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Technological Functional Properties of the Pigeonpea Flour</title><p>To determine the gelling capacity of the Pigeonpea Flour (PF), we adapted the method proposed in Coffmann and Garcia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref12">12</xref>]. The water absorption index (WAI) was determined according to Beuchat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref13">13</xref>] and the water solubility index (WSI) was obtained based on Okezie and Bello [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref14">14</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Cake Formulations</title><p>Based on previous laboratory results, we adapted a traditional recipe using four different percentages of PF and Rice Flour (RF) (0% PF + 100% RF, 10% PF + 90% RF, 20% PF + 80% RF, 30% PF + 70% RF) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Initially, all ingredients were weighed in a semi-analytical balance (Marte, S&#227;o Paulo, Brazil). Eggs, margarine and sugar were mixed with a mixer (Arno, S&#227;o Paulo, Brazil). Then, a mixture of RF and PF was added to the dough, which was homogenized for 15 min. Finally, milk, salt and baking powder were added gradually. The dough was poured into an aluminum tray, greased with margarine and sparkled with RF, and baked in an oven (Metalmaq, Duque de Caxias, Brazil) preheated at 180˚C for 1 h.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Sensory Evaluation</title><p>Ethical clearance for this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of the University of Reconcavo da Bahia (Process n. 31797114 00000056). All participants signed the Informed Consent Form (ICF).</p><p>Ranked-preference test</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Cake recipes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ingredients (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >10%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >20%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >30%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pigeonpea flour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-----</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice flour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >262.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >237.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >204.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Margarine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sugar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Egg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wholemilk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bakingpoder</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The test was conducted in individual booths with 40 untrained tasters who were offered four cake samples, in random order, displayed on disposable dishes coded with three-digits codes. The tasters were asked to taste the four samples from left to right and to order them from best to worst, according to their preference. Results were analyzed by Friedman’s non-parametric test at the 5% significance level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>Acceptance test and purchase intent</p><p>The acceptance and purchase intent tests with potential consumers were conducted based on the results obtained in the previous test, which was used to select the most preferred sample. The test was conducted with 100 untrained tasters (employees, teachers and students of the University).</p><p>The 9-point hedonic scale was used in the acceptance test, that ranged from disliked extremely (1) to liked extremely (9). The same scale was used to evaluate flavor, color, texture and overall acceptance.</p><p>A structured 5-point scale was adopted in the purchase intention test, that ranged from certainly would not buy (1) to certainly would buy (5) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref15">15</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Physicochemical Evaluation</title><p>The cake selected according to the ranked-preference test was characterized in relation to moisture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref16">16</xref>], water activity (Dec&#225;gono Lab Master, Novasina<sup>&#174;</sup>), pH, total titratable acidity, proteins, iron, zinc [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref17">17</xref>], lipids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref18">18</xref>], and fibers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref19">19</xref>]. Carbohydrates were determined by difference and total caloric value by the Atwater System [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref20">20</xref>]. Color parameters (a<sup>*</sup>, b, L<sup>*</sup>, C<sup>*</sup> and h) were determined by the CIELAB System. All evaluations were performed in triplicates.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Microbiological Evaluation</title><p>Samples were analyzed for total and thermotolerant coliforms at 45˚C, detection of Salmonella sp., and yeasts and molds, according to the methodology described in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref21">21</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Functional and Technological Properties</title><p>WAI is a parameter that indicates the integrity of starch granules and the ability to absorb water when gelatinized [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref22">22</xref>]. The average WAI found in our sample was 3.8 g/g (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). In the industry, this parameter is essential for bakery products, because it allows the maintenance of moisture and softness of the final product [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref23">23</xref>].</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Functional properties of PF</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Scores</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water Absorption Index (gel/g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8 &#177; 0.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gelification capacity (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water Solubility Index (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 &#177; 3.46</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Regarding gelling ability, gel formation was observed at a concentration of 12% of PF. Cowpea flour started to form gel at a concentration of 4% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref24">24</xref>]. Gel formation is associated with starch gelatinization, mainly provided by the amylose content, and by the ability of proteins to form three-dimensional networks capable of holding water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref25">25</xref>].</p><p>The Water Solubility Index (WSI) of PF is 8% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), lower than those found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref26">26</xref>] for five commercial cultivars of cowpea, that ranged from 17% to 23%. Another study found higher values, ranging from 9.22% to 14.83%, when evaluating the absorption and solubilization properties of mixed flour extrudates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref27">27</xref>]. The authors explained the high values by the mixture of flours whose solubility depends not only on the starch content, but also on the interaction with other nutrients such as proteins and their structural modifications post gelatinization.</p><p>It is worth mentioning that the solubility of a product depends on its chemical constitution, structural conformation and the presence of polar amino acids. Globulins are present in higher concentration in beans, mainly in the cotyledon. Because of their partial solubility in water, they are easily denatured, which can directly influence the final solubility. Moreover, the higher the proportion of amylose in the starch granules of mature beans, the more abundant the water connections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref28">28</xref>]. However, it is worth stressing that the flours used in the present study were obtained from immature grains with tegument, which may have influenced our results.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Sensory Evaluation</title><p>Ranked-preference test</p><p>There was no significant difference between the samples containing 10%, 20% and 30% PF and the control cake (P &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Based on these results, PF 30% sample was selected for the acceptance test, physicochemical and microbiological analysis due to its highest concentration of PF and, consequently, highest nutritional value.</p><p>The ages of participants of the acceptance test were distributed as: from 15 to 20 years old (25%), from 21 to 29 years old (43%), from 30 to 39 years old (21%), from 40 to 49 years old (9%) and from 50 to 59 (2%). Most participants were females (71%).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Ranked-preference test</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Scores</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PF10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PF20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PF30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100<sup>a</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>CF = Rice flour cake used as control (0% PF + 100% RF); PF10 = 10% PF + 90% RF; PF20 = 20% PF + 80% RF; PF30 = 30% PF + 70% RF. Scores followed by the same letter did not differ from each other at the 5% of significance. Total taste score attributed by tasters.</p><p>Among the studied population, 32% consume cake on a monthly basis, 20% on a fortnightly basis, 1% 2 to 3 times a week, and 26% once a week. According to this, consumption of cakes by this population is not usual. The tasters approved the PF30% recipe with 90% of positive acceptance, i.e., scores in the acceptance zone (6 to 9) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(A)).</p><p>These results resemble those found in Borges et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref29">29</xref>], when partially replacing wheat flour with oat flour. They found a better acceptance of the formulation containing 30% of oat flour in comparison with 15% and 45%. Cowpea flour (CF) was also used in enriched baked goods such as biscuit and Brazilian rolls (10%, 20% and 30% of CF), with a better acceptance of the recipe with 10% CF (84.4%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref30">30</xref>]. A cake recipe developed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref31">31</xref>] with 20% CF plus 20% flour without teguments and with teguments obtained 89.2% and 85.1% of acceptance, respectively.</p><p>It is worth noting that gluten-free products (GFP) are currently found in markets, but they are often not well accepted by consumers. Furthermore, many GFP still present some nutritional imbalances and inadequacies and are costly in comparison to products that contain gluten. This makes GFP hardly accessible to economically disadvantaged populations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref33">33</xref>].</p><p>Therefore, the incorporation of rice flour in product formulations is an excellent strategy to confer functional characteristics to gluten-free products without increasing the final product’s cost, meeting the needs of individuals with nutritional diseases such as celiac disease and consumers who are increasingly looking for healthier foods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>The purchase intention test obtained 70% of positive intention—would probably buy or would certainly buy the product (values 4 and 5). The negative intention, that is, people who certainly or probably would not buy (values 1 and 2) totaled 7% (values 1 and 2), while 23% of testers were not sure (value 3) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(B)).</p><p>According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref34">34</xref>], the consumer’s intention to buy a food product is guided by a very complex process, influenced by different variables such as price, convenience and marketing, but the sensorial attributes of the product are essential to confirm the decision.</p><p>Sensorial attributes of flavor, color, texture and overall acceptance obtained averages of 7.17, 6.79, 6.41, 7.34, respectively, varying between the terms “liked slightly” and “liked moderately”. Results indicate, in general, good sensorial acceptance of the cake. A study on the acceptability of biscuits prepared with cowpea, andu and mangalo beans, considered the same attributes and obtained lower averages: 5.16, 6.47, 6.85, 5.85, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref35">35</xref>].</p><p>Results indicate that the product presents acceptable sensorial characteristics, showing the viability of the use of RF and CF in the development of cakes. In addition to the incorporation of raw materials from RF in food processing, it can be included in school menus, according to the guidelines of the National School Feeding Program [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref36">36</xref>]. Additionally, the proposed flour mixture meets the demand for celiac patients (gluten-free foods) and represents a complementary/ alternative option for the treatment of patients with sickle cell disease through the improvement of their prognosis and health status [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref5">5</xref>]. Moreover, since the annual per capita household consumption of beans and rice has dropped in Brazil, it promotes their consumption in the daily diet as recommended by the Brazilian Food Guide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref11">11</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Physicochemical and Microbiological Evaluations</title><p>Results of the centesimal analysis of the PF30% formulation are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>The cake can be classified as of low acidity, since its pH is higher than 4.5 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Therefore, it is extremely important to control this product characteristic during storage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref37">37</xref>]. The average acidity of the product is 0.94. Cake recipes</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Physicochemical analysis of the cake made with flour mixture of rice and Pigeon flour</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average &#177; SD</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.08 &#177; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acidity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94 &#177; 0.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water activity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92 &#177; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.25 &#177; 3.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fibers (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.53 &#177; 1.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lipids (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.44 &#177; 0.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proteins (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.85 &#177; 0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ashes (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.75 &#177; 0.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbohydrates (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.18 &#177; 4.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron (mg/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.50 &#177; 0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zinc (mg/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.80 &#177; 0.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy value (kcal/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >246.10 &#177; 4.46</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>developed with 7% and 30% of watermelon inner skin flour found “after cooking” pH of 7.65 and 6.66, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref38">38</xref>]. However, the formulations showed higher acidity (1.0 and 4.56) than the product developed in the present study.</p><p>The average Water Activity (WA) of the product is 0.92, slightly higher than that found by other authors. One study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref39">39</xref>] found WA ranging from 0.716 to 0.918 for different types of chocolate cake toppings, while [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref40">40</xref>] obtained average values ranging from 0.880 to 0.900, when evaluating the influence of oat and fat contents on the technological and functional characteristics of cakes. The moisture content of the studied product was 27.25%. This value is lower than the one found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref41">41</xref>], for cakes made with white bean flour (32.83%). In the study mentioned, it was observed that high levels of moisture are found in cakes with dietary fiber, which is explained by the property of the fibers to retain and maintain water in their structure during the cooking process. The content of fibers observed in our product is 12.53, which is much higher than the values found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref41">41</xref>] in cakes containing 50% of white bean flour (5.18%).</p><p>This product showed lower lipid content (6.44) when compared to the findings in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref37">37</xref>], which evaluated 3 cake formulations using 8.87% wheat flour (F1) and mixed wheat flour substitute as follows: 12.13%(F2), 10.09% (F3).</p><p>The carbohydrate content of our product is 37.18%, which is similar to that found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref42">42</xref>] for standard and optimized cakes (59.32% and 59.30%, respectively). Regarding protein content, the product is composed of 9.85% of this macronutrient, which is higher than that reported in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref38">38</xref>], which found 6.47% of protein in a cake made with wheat flour. In addition to the increase in the protein content, the partial substitution of rice flour by bean flour improves the product’s amino acid profile [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>Most of the studies cited here lack the determination of micronutrients levels. Here, we quantified two important micronutrients, iron and zinc, and compared our results with a few existing studies. The iron content of our product is 3.5 mg/100g, which is higher than that found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref43">43</xref>], for cakes made with refined wheat flour (0.14 mg). The zinc content is 2.80 mg/100g. Biscuits and Brazilian rolls with 10% of cowpea flour presented 0.70 mg/100g and 0.42 mg/100g of zinc, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref31">31</xref>].</p><p>The addition of PF to cake recipes can increase the iron and zinc intake. This makes it a good option to be included in school meals, benefiting mainly the children, who are the most affected by micronutrient deficiency.</p><p>The iron and zinc content of our product is within the recommendations of the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) for children between 4 and 8 years of age. Iron and zinc vary equally in 35%. For children between 9 and 13 years of age, our product account for 43.75% and 35% of the DRI for iron and zinc, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref44">44</xref>].</p><p>Based on these results, we believe that the addition of PF to cakes can increase the intake of iron and zinc and, hence, it is worth including in the school feeding program. Schoolers represent a group of great vulnerability due to their rapid growth, physiological and immunological immaturity and inadequacies in nutrient intake, which may compromise their nutritional status and lead to nutritional deficiencies or excesses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref45">45</xref>].</p><p>Regarding energetic value, the cake has 289.69 kcal, a result lower than the one (321.3 kcal) found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref37">37</xref>].</p><p>Regarding the chromaticity parameters, we found a<sup>*</sup> = 2.77 &#177; 0.170 and b<sup>*</sup> = 18.65 &#177; 0.421, luminosity (L<sup>*</sup>) = 53.223 &#177; 0.456, C<sup>*</sup> = 18.860 &#177; 0.407 and h = 51.547 &#177; 0.633. These last two parameters indicate that the product is yellowish, with low saturation. The addition of PF reduced L<sup>*</sup> and increased b<sup>*</sup>, indicating a shift from white to yellow. Higher L<sup>*</sup> and a<sup>*</sup> values and lower b<sup>*</sup> were found in cakes made with rice bran flours and extruded bean bread flour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref46">46</xref>].</p><p>According to the microbiological evaluation, the cake sample complies with the standards established by the Brazilian Legislation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113448-ref47">47</xref>], for Salmonella sp., contamination by yeasts and molds (&lt;1 log CFU/g), Total Coliforms (&lt;3 NMP/g) and Coliforms at 45˚C (&lt;3 NMP/g).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>This work found that it is possible to incorporate RF and PF in the development of baked goods, creating a product with adequate sensorial, microbiological and physicochemical characteristics. The developed cake meets the needs of the food industry as a gluten-free, affordable, nutritionally rich product with organoleptic characteristics that favors consumer’s taste. It also incorporates products from family farming into the food processing and stimulates the adoption of healthy eating habits. The studied flour mixture formulation can be included into menus of School Meals Programs.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are thankful to CNPq for their financial support.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Santos, F.L., Santos, W., Machado, B., Fonseca, K., Oliveira, M. and Nascimento, A. (2021) Chemical Composition and Nutritional Evaluation of Cake Made with Flour Mixture of Pigeonpea and Rice. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 12, 1164-1176. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2021.1211085</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.113448-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wander, A.E. (2017) Cenário Nacional e novas oportunidades de Mercado. Embrapa Arroz e Feij&amp;#227o, Goiás. https://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/1078887/1/CNPAF2017conafep292.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brasil (2014) Plano Safra 2014-2015: Agricultura familiar na Bahia, da assistência técnica à comercializa&amp;#231&amp;#227o. Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento, SEAGRI/SUAF.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Embrapa (2012) Informa&amp;#231&amp;#245es técnicas para o cultivo do feijoeiro-comum na Regi&amp;#227o Central Brasileira: 2012-2014. Embrapa, Arroz e Feij&amp;#227o, Santo Ant&amp;#244nio de Goiás. http://www.cnpaf.embrapa.br/transferencia/informacoestecnicas/publicacoesonline/seriedocumentos_272.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azevedo, R.L., Ribeiro, G.T. and Azevedo, C.L.L. (2010) Feij&amp;#227o guandu: Uma planta multioso. Revista Fapese, 3, 81-86.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cordovil, K., Cople-Rodrigues, C.S., Santos, I.N., et al. (2015) Revis&amp;#227o das Propriedades Medicinais de Cajanus cajanna Doen&amp;#231a Falciforme. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, 17, 1169-117. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-084x/14_139</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walter, M., Marchezan, E. and Avila, L.A. (2008) Arroz: Composi&amp;#231&amp;#227o e características nutricionais. Ciência Rural, 38, 1184-1192. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782008000400049</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mesquita, F.R., Corrêa, A.D., Abreu, C.M.P., et al. (2007) Linhagens de feij&amp;#227o (phaseolus vulgaris L.): Composi&amp;#231&amp;#227o química e digestibilidade protéica. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 31, 1114-1121. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542007000400026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mariani, M., Oliveira, V.R., Faccin, R., et al. (2015) Elabora&amp;#231&amp;#227o e avalia&amp;#231&amp;#227o de biscoitos sem glúten a partir de farelo de arroz e farinhas de arroz e de soja. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology, 18, 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-6723.6514</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zavareze, E.R., Moraes, K.S. and Salas-Mellado, M.L.M. (2010) Qualidade tecnológica e sensorial de bolos elaborados com soro de leite. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 30, 100-105. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612010000100015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IBGE (2011) Pesquisa de Or&amp;#231amentos Familiares 2008-2009 POF, Rio de Janeiro. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv50063.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brasil (2014) Guia alimentar para a popula&amp;#231&amp;#227o brasileira. Ministério da Saúde, Brasília.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coffmann, C.W. and Garcia, V.V. (1977) Functional Properties and Amino Acid Content of a Protein Isolate from Mung Bean Flour. Journal of Food Technology, 12, 473-484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1977.tb00132.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beuchat, L.R. (1977) Functional and Electrophoretic Characteristics of Succinylated Peanut Flour Protein. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 25, 258-261. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60210a044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okezie, B.O. and Bello, A.B. (1988) Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Winged Bean Flour and Isolate Compared with Soy Isolate. Journal of Food Science, 53, 450-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb07728.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meilgaard, M.R., Civille, G.V. and Carr, B.T. (2007) Sensory Evaluation Techniques. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16452</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AOAC (1997) International Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IAL (2008) Métodos físico-químicos para análise de alimentos. Instituto Adolfo Lutz, S&amp;#227o Paulo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bligh, E.G. and Dyer, W.J. (1959) A Rapid Method of Total Lipid Extraction and Purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology, 37, 911-917. https://doi.org/10.1139/o59-099</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. (1991) Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber and Non-Starch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Watt, B. and Merril, A.L. (1963) Composition of Foods: Raw, Processed, Prepared. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">APHA (2001) Committee on Microbiological for Foods. Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. American Public Health Association, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, E.M.M., Ascheri, J.L.R., Ascheri, D.P.R., et al. (2013) Efeito da extrus&amp;#227o termoplástica nas características de viscosidade de pasta, solubilidade e absor&amp;#231&amp;#227o de água de farinhas pré-gelatinizadas de milho e feij&amp;#227o carioca. Boletim CEPPA, 31, 99-114. https://doi.org/10.5380/cep.v31i1.32707</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, K., Lu, F., Li, Z., et al. (2017) Recent Developments in Gluten-Free Bread Baking Approaches: A Review. Food Science and Technology, 37, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-457x.01417</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pereira, R.N. (2013) Caracteriza&amp;#231&amp;#227o bioquímica, nutricional efuncional de Genótipo selite de feij&amp;#227o caupi Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Disserta&amp;#231&amp;#227o, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, N., Singh, J., Kaur, L., et al. (2003) Morphological, Thermal and Rheological Properties of Starches from Different Botanical Sources. Food Chemistry, 81, 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00416-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rios, M.J.B.L., Lugo, L.M.N., Sampaio, J.P.M., et al. (2016) Parametros físicos de farinhas de cinco cultivares de feij&amp;#227o-caupi [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. IV Congresso Nacional de Feij&amp;#227o-Caupi, Embrapa, Sorriso.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moura, L.S.M., Ascheri, J.L.R., Silva, C.C.O., et al. (2011) Propriedades de absor&amp;#231&amp;#227o e solubiliza&amp;#231&amp;#227o de extrudados de farinha mista de feij&amp;#227o, milho e arroz biofortificados. IV Reuni&amp;#227o de biofortifica&amp;#231&amp;#227o, Teresina.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salgado, S.M., Guerra, N.B., Andrade., S.A.C., et al. (2005) Caracteriza&amp;#231&amp;#227o físico-química do granulo do amido do feij&amp;#227o caupi. Revista Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 25, 525-530. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612005000300022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Borges, J.T.S., Pirozi, M.R., Lucia, S.M.D., et al. (2006) Utiliza&amp;#231&amp;#227o de farinha mista de aveia e trigo na elabora&amp;#231&amp;#227o de bolos. Boletim CEPPA, 24, 145-162. https://doi.org/10.5380/cep.v24i1.5286</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frota, K.M.G., Morgano, M.A., Silva, M.G., et al. (2010) Utiliza&amp;#231&amp;#227o da farinha de feij&amp;#227o-caupi (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) na elabora&amp;#231&amp;#227o de produtos de panifica&amp;#231&amp;#227o. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 30, 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612009005000003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nascimento, A.S., Oliveira, M.C., Portela, A.C.C., et al. (2017) Análise sensorial de bolos desenvolvidos com farinha de feij&amp;#227o da agricultura familiar. VIII Congresso latino americano, XIV Congresso brasileiro de higienistas de alimentos e VI encontro do sistema brasileiro de inspe&amp;#231&amp;#227o de produtos de origem animal. Revista de Higiene Alimentar, 31, 266-267.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Missbach, B., Schwingshackl, L., Billmann, A., et al. (2015) Gluten-Free Food Database: The Nutritional Quality and Cost of Packaged Gluten-Free Foods. PeerJ, 3, .1-18. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1337</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Khoury, D., Balfour-Ducharme, S. and Joye, J.I. (2018) A Review on the Gluten-Free Diet: Technological and Nutritional Challenges. Nutrients, 10, 1410. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101410</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walter, E.H.M., Fontes, L.C.B., Osawa, C.C., et al. (2010) A influência de coberturas comestíveis na aceita&amp;#231&amp;#227o sensorial e inten&amp;#231&amp;#227o de compra de bolos de chocolate. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 30, 335-341. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612010000200008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farias, L.C., Santos, W.P.C., Benevides, C.M.J., et al. (2016) Avalia&amp;#231&amp;#227o da aceitabilidade de biscoitos elaborados com os feij&amp;#245es caupi, andu e mangal&amp;#244. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos. Anais XXV Congresso Brasileiro de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Gramado.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferigollo, D., Kirsten, V.R., Heckler, D., et al. (2017) Aquisi&amp;#231&amp;#227o de produtos da agricultura familiar para alimenta&amp;#231&amp;#227o escolar em municípios do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista de Saúde Pública, 51, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1518-8787.2017051006648</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, L.A.A., Freitas, F.V., Vieira, T.S., et al. (2017) Utiliza&amp;#231&amp;#227o de ingredientes sucedaneos ao trigo na elabora&amp;#231&amp;#227o de bolos sem glúten. Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz, 76, 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guimaraes, R.R., Freitas, M.C.J. and Silva, V.M. (2010) Bolos simples elaborados com farinha da entrecasca de melancia (Citrullus vulgaris, sobral): Avalia&amp;#231&amp;#227o química, física e sensorial. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 30, 354-363. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612010000200011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Osawa, C.C., Fontes, L.C.B., Miranda, E.H.W., et al. (2009) Avalia&amp;#231&amp;#227o físico-química de bolo de chocolate com coberturas comestíveis à base de gelatina, ácido esteárico, amido modificado ou cera de carnaúba. Ciência e Tecnologia Alimentos, 29, 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612009000100015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gutkoski, L.C., Teixeira, D.M.F., Durigon, A., et al. (2009) Influência dos teores de aveia e de gordura nas características tecnológicas e funcionais de bolos. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 29, 254. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612009000200003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carvalho, V.S., Damiani, C., Brand&amp;#227o, C.C., et al. (2011) Avalia&amp;#231&amp;#227o da composi&amp;#231&amp;#227o química do bolo elaborado com farinha de feij&amp;#227o branco. Anais Congresso Nacional de pesquisa de feij&amp;#227o, Goiania.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, I.C.V., Santos, A.A.O., Alves, A.R., et al. (2012) Fécula de mandioca e farinha de albedo de laranja na formula&amp;#231&amp;#227o de bolos de chocolate. Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (impresso), 71, 111-117.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pinki, A. and Pratima, A. (2014) Sensory and Nutritional Evaluation of Value Added Cakes Formulated by Incorporating Beetroot Powder. International Journal of Food and Nutritional Sciences, 3, 145-148.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IOM (2002) Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Proteinand Aminoácidos. National Academy Press, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carvalho, C.A., Fonsêca, P.C.A., Priore, S.E., et al. (2015) Consumo alimentar e adequa&amp;#231&amp;#227o nutricional em crian&amp;#231as brasileiras: Revis&amp;#227o sistemática. Revista Paulista de Pediatria, 33, 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpped.2015.03.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gomes, L.O.F., Santiago, R.A.C., Koakuzu, S.N., et al. (2014) Estabilidade microbiológica e físico-química de misturas para bolo sem glúten e qualidade dos bolos prontos para consumo. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology, 17, 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-6723.0914</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113448-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brasil (2001) Resolu&amp;#231&amp;#227o RDC no. 12 de 02 de janeiro de 2001. Agência Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitária, Ministério da Saúde, ANVISA/MS.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>