<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MSCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-6045</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/msce.2021.911002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MSCE-113188</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of High-Energy Vibrating Ball Milling in the Reduction of the Crystallite Size of TiO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Particles
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ganbat</surname><given-names>Batdemberel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dugerjav</surname><given-names>Otgonbayar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gonchigsuren</surname><given-names>Munkhsaikhan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Physics, School of Applied Sciences, Mongolian University of Science and Technology, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>11</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>7</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>3,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this work, TiO
  <sub>2</sub> powders were prepared by high energy vibrating ball milling. X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Photon cross correlation spectroscopy (PCCS with Nanophox) were used to determine the crystallite size of anatase TiO
  <sub>2</sub>. Depending on the grinding conditions (short grinding time, ball diameter, stainless steel ball and grinding powder ratio), the crystallite size decreased from 34 nm to 8 nm. The average diameter of a TiO
  <sub>2</sub> particle with 8 nm crystals was ~221 nm. No structural phase transition was observed during milling.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>X-Ray Diffraction</kwd><kwd> Scanning Electron Microscopy</kwd><kwd> Anatase</kwd><kwd> Nanoparticle</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The TiO<sub>2</sub> compound has two main modifications, anatase and rutile, and at high temperatures the anatase phase is converted to the rutile phase. TiO<sub>2</sub> powder is used to produce white paint. Nanostructured TiO<sub>2</sub> is widely used in photocatalysis, electronics, energy and environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref3">3</xref>]. In recent years, much research has been conducted on the use of nanostructured rutile TiO<sub>2</sub> as a phase transition material for latent heat energy storage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref7">7</xref>]. TiO<sub>2</sub> has been used to improve some parameters of phosphate glass for solid state batteries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref9">9</xref>]. Long-term (up to 100 h) grinding of anatase TiO<sub>2</sub> in a high-energy vibrating ball mill has been shown to lead to structural phase changes, but not to an amorphous process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref10">10</xref>]. In the mechanochemical synthesis of TiO<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles, it has been observed that the anatase phase transforms into the rutile phase with increasing temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>In this work, we aim to reduce the crystal size of anatase-type TiO<sub>2</sub> powder using a high-energy ball mill for the study of heat storage materials.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><p>1) Milling process: High purity (99.8%) anatase type TiO<sub>2</sub> (IV) powder was used in the present study. The 10 g powder sample was placed in a dry 80 ml steel cylindrical container with a high-purity steel ball in a 1200 rpm/min. Table-top high-energy vibrating ball mill (Across International, Material Processing Equipment-ISO 9001:2015) manufactured in the United States. To avoid the agglomeration process of particle and device overheating, it was milled for 5 minutes and cooled for 1 h at −35˚C temperature. This milling procedure is an advanced part of our work. Milling was carried out between 15 minutes and 8 hours and 25 minutes. The milling process of TiO<sub>2</sub> powder is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>Eight large steel balls with a diameter of 1 mm were used for 15 and 30 minutes of grinding. The total weight of these balls was 65.71 g. At this time, the mass ratio between the powder sample and the steel ball was 1:6. 17 small steel balls with a diameter of 0.5 mm and a total weight of 58.05 g were used during the 1- and 3-hour grinding periods. The mass ratio between the powder sample and the steel ball was 1:5. Also, 36 small steel balls with a diameter of 0.3 mm were ground for 5, 6, and 7 hours. The total weight of these balls was 34.52 g. In this case, the mass ratio between the powder sample and the steel ball was 1:3. Then, a mixture of balls with different diameters (2 steel balls with a diameter of 1 mm, 4 steel balls with a diameter of 0.8 mm, 3 steel balls with a diameter of 0.5 mm, 7 steel balls with a diameter of 0.3 mm) was used during the milling period of 8 hours and 25 minutes. Their total weight was 41.9 g and the mass ratio between the powder sample and the steel ball was 1:4. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the grinding process and the tools used in the study.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Number, diameter, powder/balls mass ratio, and total weight of steel balls at different meals</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Milling time</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of steel balls</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diameter of steel balls, mm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mass ratio of powder/balls</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >The total weight of the balls, g</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 h and 25 min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(2 + 4 + 3 + 7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 + 0.8 + 0.5 + 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.90</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The grinding method we used reduced the crystallite size in a short time, and this grinding method is slightly different from the grinding methods used by other reseachers.</p><p>2) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM): The study samples were measured by scanning electron microscope with EDX. The measurement results are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, large particles with a size of 5 &#181;m can be seen. Due to the low resolution of SEM, the shape and size of the particles could not be observed well. In the section marked with the letter A in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, the analysis only detected the elements Ti.</p><p>The elemental analysis did not reveal any elements other than only Ti.</p><p>3) X-ray diffraction study (XRD): XRD measurements were performed at ambient conditions using an X-ray powder diffractometer (Enraf Nonius Delft). A step size of 0.02<sup>0</sup>, an integration time of 2 s per step and a scan range of 13<sup>0</sup> to 70<sup>0</sup> were used. The program “FullProf. Suite” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref12">12</xref>] was used to calculate peak position, peak width and peak intensity in the X-ray patterns. The X-ray diffraction spectrum of the non-milled primary sample is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>X-ray phase analysis revealed that the primary sample TiO<sub>2</sub> is a tetragonal symmetric anatase-type titanium oxide (TiO<sub>2</sub> (IV)) with space group I41/amd. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the Miller indices (hkl) corresponding to the diffraction peaks of the anatase type of TiO<sub>2</sub>, with the numbers in parentheses. This shows that the diffraction peak with the highest intensity is the Miller index (101). The extension of the diffraction line analysis was performed on an actual peak profile with an index (101). No phase changes and no amorphization were observed in the X-ray pattern during the milling period of up to 8 hours. However, in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref8">8</xref>], two structural phase transitions (metastable phase TiO<sub>2</sub> (II) and high pressure TiO<sub>2</sub> (B)) were observed during milling of anatase-type TiO<sub>2</sub> powder for up to 100 hours. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> compares the X-ray patterns of TiO<sub>2</sub> samples measured at different times using an X-ray diffractometer. As can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, the intensity of the diffraction peaks decreases and the width of the peaks increases with increasing grinding time.</p><p>The following Scherrer’s equation was used to determine the crystallite size of the samples:</p><p>D c = K ⋅ λ cos θ ⋅ Δ B ( 2 θ ) (1)</p><p>where λ is the wavelength of the X-rays (Cu/K<sub>α</sub> = 0.154 nm), Δ B ( 2 θ ) is the full width corresponding to half the height of the highest intensity peak in the X-ray pattern, θ is the Bragg angle. The factor K depends on the shape of the particle and is 0.94 in the case of spherical particles.</p><p>The crystallite sizes of TiO<sub>2</sub> were determined using Equation (1). The values of the full width at half height of the highest peak on the X-ray pattern of the samples (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) were used. The results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>As can be seen from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, the corresponding crystallite size in the original sample was fixed at 34 nm. After grinding for 15 to 30 minutes, the crystallite size was reduced to 27 nm. However, during 1 hour grinding, it increased</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The relationship between grinding time and crystallite size of TiO<sub>2</sub> powder</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Milling time</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >θ<sub>0</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >cos θ 0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Δ B ( 2 θ 0 )</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >λ, nm (Cu/K<sub>α</sub>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>c</sub>, nm</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (unmilled)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9757</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.690</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9755</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.670</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9756</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.690</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9755</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.670</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9756</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.380</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.670</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9756</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.830</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9757</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.030</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.660</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9756</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.530</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 h 25 min.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.690</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9755</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.490</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>slightly to 28 nm. The sample was further ground for 6 hours to reduce the crystallite size to ~8 nm. When the sample was ground for 7 hours and 8 hours and 25 minutes, there was a tendency that the crystallite size in the samples increased again. In the work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113188-ref11">11</xref>], the reason for the increase in particle size was explained by the electrostatic effect of very fine particles.</p><p>Investigation of particle size of powdered TiO<sub>2</sub>: Photon cross correlation spectroscopy (PCCS with Nanophox) is an instrument that simultaneously makes accurate measurements of particle size and stability of opaque suspensions and emulsions in the range of 1 nm to 10,000 nm. The powdered TiO<sub>2</sub> sample was prepared in the form of suspension samples by immersion in double distilled water, depending on the grinding time. KS 900F ultrasonic generator was used to disperse the suspension for 1 minute. The suspension sample for PCCS measurements was prepared in a 12.5 mm wide, 12.5 mm deep, and 36 mm high disposable clear plastic cuvette (Eppendorf UVette@, Sympatec part No. NZ0020) with a filling volume of 50 μl to 2000 μl. The cuvette was placed in a thermostatically adjusted container of clean water so that it is orthogonal to the beam path of the 632.8 nm HeNe laser. Then the thermostat was filled with 0.22 μm filtered double distilled water to a level of 3/4. Windox 5 software was used to process the measurement results. As an example, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows the density distributions of a TiO<sub>2</sub> powder sample. Similar plots as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> were also obtained for other milled samples.</p><p>The particle size, which is 50% of the cumulative distribution, indicates the average particle size of the sample. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>, the average particle size is 221 nm, the range of particle size distribution is 41 nm - 343 nm, and the specific surface area is 27.35 (m<sup>2</sup>/cm<sup>3</sup>). The number of nanoparticles (&lt;100 nm) was 0.04% by volume. The shape of the density distribution curve is Gaussian symmetric. The particle sizes measured with the PCCS device at different meals were taken from the graphs of experimental results and summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Particle size parameters of TiO<sub>2</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Grinding time (t)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >The average particle size ( x &#175; 50 )</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Particle size distribution</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Specific surface area (m<sup>2</sup>/cm<sup>3</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (unmilled)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133 nm &#247; 7.7 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429 nm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >319 nm &#247; 6.5 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >381 nm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296 nm &#247; 530 nm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >470 nm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >368 nm &#247; 659 nm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280 nm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238 nm &#247; 368 nm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >406 nm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >319 nm &#247; 570 nm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >221 nm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 nm &#247; 343 nm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.35</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The surface area to surface volume ratio increases drastically with the decrease of particle size. After the TiO<sub>2</sub> sample was ground for 6 hours, the specific surface area increased from 1.30 to 27.35 (m<sup>2</sup>/cm<sup>3</sup>). This indicates an increase in the chemical activity of the TiO<sub>2</sub> powder. The average particle size of the TiO<sub>2</sub> sample was reduced from 4.6 μm to 221 nm. The lack of PCCS measurements for ground samples up to 7 and 8 hours is due to the inability to prepare water stable suspensions.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Conclusions</title><p>Based on the above analysis, the conclusions were summarized as follows:</p><p>1) Short-time grinding and slow cooling can be an effective way to rapidly reduce the crystallite size of powder materials.</p><p>2) X-ray diffraction analysis showed that no phase transition was observed in anatase TiO<sub>2</sub> as a function of the short grinding time.</p><p>3) The crystallite sizes of the anatase TiO<sub>2</sub> powder sample were reduced from 34 nm to 8 nm as a function of milling time.</p><p>4) Photon cross-correlation spectroscopic measurements revealed that the average particle size of a TiO<sub>2</sub> particle with ~8 nm was 221 nm. The number of nanoparticles (&lt;100 nm) was 0.04% of the volume.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was funded by the basic research project “Study of Thermal Storage Nanomaterials” of Mongolian Science and Technology Foundation. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from Mongolian Science and Technology Foundation.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Batdemberel, G., Otgonbayar, D. and Munkhsaikhan, G. (2021) Effect of High-Energy Vibrating Ball Milling in the Reduction of the Crystallite Size of TiO<sub>2</sub> Particles. Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, 9, 7-14. https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2021.911002</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.113188-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hanaor, D.A.H. and Sorrell., C.C. (2011) Review of the Anatase to Rutile Phase Transformation. Journal of Materials Science, 46, 885-874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5113-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113188-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ge, M., Cao, C., Huang, J., Shuhui, L. and Chen, Z. (2016) A Review of One-Dimensional TiO2 Nanostructured Materials for Environmental and Energy Applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 4, 6772-6801. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA09323F</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113188-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Theivasanthi, T. (2017) Review on Titania Nanopowder—Processing and Applications. arXiv:1704.00981 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113188-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ohkoshi, S., Tsunobuchi, Y., Matsuda, T., et al. (2010) Synthesis of a Metal Oxide with a Room-Temperature Photoreversible Phase Transition. Nature Chemistry, 2, 539-545. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.670</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113188-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, G.N. and Reddy, G.B. (2017) Experimental Analysis on Nano-Based Phase Change Material for Cooling Applications in Tropical Buildings. Journal of Science and Technology, 13, 101-116.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113188-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Daou, I., El-Kaddadi, L., Zegaoui, O., Asbik, M. and Zari, N. (2017) Structural, Morphological and Thermal Properties of Novel Hybrid-Microencapsulated Phase Change Materials Based on Fe2O3, ZnO and TiO2 Nanoparticles for Latent Heat Thermal Energy Storage Applications. Journal of Energy Storage, 17, 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2018.02.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113188-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Kayiem, H.H., Lin, S.C. and Lukmon, A. (2013) Review on Nanomaterials for Thermal Energy Storage Technologies. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology-Asia, 3, 60-71. https://doi.org/10.2174/22113525113119990011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113188-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Es-Soufi, H. and Bih, L. (2021) Effect of TiO2 on the Chemical Durability and Optical Properties of Mo-Based Phosphate Glasses. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 558, Article ID: 120655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.120655</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113188-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Es-Soufi, H., Bih, L., Lima, A.R.F., et al. (2021) Investigation DSC and XRD on the Crystallization Kinetics in the Phosphate Li2O-Li2WO4-TiO2-P2O5 Glassy Ionic System. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 32, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-190511/v1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113188-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sen, S., Ram, M.L., Roy, S. and Sarkar, B.K. (1999) The Structural Transformation of Anatase TiO2 by High-Energy Vibrational Ball Milling. Journal of Materials Research, 14, 841-848. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1999.0112</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113188-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salari, M., Rezaee, M., Mousavi Koie, S.M., Marashi, P. and Aboutalebi, H. (2008) Effect of Milling Time on Mechanochemical Synthesis of TiO2 Nanoparticles. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 22, 2955-2961. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979208047808</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113188-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roisnel, T. and Rodriguez-Carvajal, J. (2014) FullProf Suite: Winplotr, A Graphic Tool for Powder Diffraction. Version: April 2014.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>