GEPJournal of Geoscience and Environment Protection2327-4336Scientific Research Publishing10.4236/gep.2021.911004GEP-113156ArticlesEarth&Environmental Sciences Statistical Analyses and Geotechnical Evaluation of Nubia Sandstone, Golden Triangle Area, Egypt HeshamAhmed Hussein Ismaiel1MohamedMohamed Askalany1AliIsmail Ali1*Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt091120210911466010, October 202113, November 2021 16, November 2021© Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 2014This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Great efforts had been made to use indirect non-destructive tests in the geotechnical evaluation of rocks, especially sandstones, employing different empirical equations. However, most of these equations have been derived from hard and compacted sandstones data ; therefore, the focus of this research is on weak and weakly compacted sandstones, aiming firstly to obtain empirical equations for estimating their characteristics, secondly to demonstrate and visualize the correlations between the studied variables, and finally to cluster the studied samples based on their characteristics. To attain these aims , twenty oriented block samples were collected from Nubia sandstone, central Eastern Desert, Golden Triangle area, Egypt. These samples were prepared and tested according to standard test methods, including uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian tensile strength (BTS), Schmidt rebound number (SRN), porosity (<i>n</i>), bulk density (ρ), and ultrasonic P-wave velocity (UPV). The loss on ignition (LOI) was also employed as a physicochemical test for classifying the studied samples and indicating pores filling materials. The results revealed that these sandstones are characterized mainly by high <i>n</i>, low ρ, and low UPV values and these give an indication of weakly compacted and weakly cemented sandstone with shallow burial diagenetic conditions. Based on UCS and elastic modulus values, these sandstones are mainly classified as very low strength and highly yielding rocks. The results of regression analysis show satisfactory correlations between physical and mechanical characteristics, indicating the suitability of obtained empirical equations to deduce these properties. Principal component analysis revealed that the LOI, BTS, SRN, and USC have a positive correlation to each other and weakly correlated with <i>ρ</i> and UPV, which positively correlated to each other and negatively correlated to <i>n</i>. The results of agglomerative hierarchical clustering revealed that the studied samples can group into three main clusters depending on their USC, LOI, and <i>n</i> values.

Geotechnical Evaluation Empirical Equations Statistical Analyses Nubia Sandstone Non-Destructive Test1. Introduction

Significant efforts had been made to use indirect non-destructive tests instead of direct destructive tests in geotechnical applications, such as tunnels, dams, rock excavation or drilling, roads, slope stability assessment, and building. This is due to the direct destructive tests, such as the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test, which are mostly overworked, time consumed and more expensive, as it requires special sample preparation and depends on rigorous standards (Ceryan et al., 2013; Ozcelik, Bayram, & Yasitli, 2013).

Moreover, these direct tests are mostly not suitable for weathered rocks, friable, jointed, foliated, and laminated rocks (Mishra & Basu, 2012). It also may not be possible in the oil industry (Garia et al., 2019) and the historical building stones evaluation (Dan et al., 2010). Therefore, indirect non-destructive tests are frequently employed to obtain empirical equations to estimate the mechanical properties of rocks (Minaeian & Ahangari, 2013). Ultrasonic P-wave velocity (UPV) test for example is one of the essential non-destructive tests, which is employed to investigate some properties of rocks, such as degree of rock weathering (Schmidt, 1951), tensile strength (Hosseini & Shirin, 2015), UCS (Kurtulus et al., 2018), elastic properties (Abdullah et al., 2019), slake durability index (Hosseini, 2016), and the physical properties of rocks (Kurtuluş et al., 2016).

Numerous empirical equations have been obtained for estimating the geotechnical and physical properties of sedimentary rocks “especially sandstones” employing different indirect tests (Table 1). Most of these equations have been derived from hard and compacted sandstone data. Moreover, (Garia et al., 2019) concluded that the empirical equations derived by various researchers are valid only to the data set for which the relationship is derived, because of the chemical and mineralogical composition, pores geometry, grain size, cementing material not considered when evaluating these equations. For this reason, the loss on ignition (LOI) at high temperature (1000˚C) is employed as a physicochemical test in this work for indicating the nature of pores filling materials, which increase the strength of weakly compacted (shallow burial) sandstones and reduce their porosity and permeability. The LOI values are greatly influenced by volatiles such as sulfur, carbon dioxide, chlorine, and lattice water that forms the pore filling carbonate minerals (calcite and dolomite), salts, sulfates minerals (Gypsum and anhydrite), and clay minerals (Dabrio et al., 2004). The LOI determination is simple, inexpensive, and faster than the other geochemical and petrographical analyses, so that the LOI test can be very useful for obtaining empirical equations, understanding the mechanical behavior of the weak sandstones, and classifying the studied sandstone.

Equations for predicting some physical and mechanical prosperity of sandstones and other sedimentary rocks from several areas in the world with their references, input data, units, and regression coefficient (R)
Input dataReferenceEquationUnitR
UPV & n %(Soroush et al., 2011)n = −7.415 ln(UPV) + 64.96m/s0.78
UPV & ρ(Soroush et al., 2011)ρ = −2 × 10−8 UPV2 + 0.0002 UPV + 1.93g/cm3, m/s0.71
UPV & UCS(Kurtuluş et al., 2016)UCS = 8.1−6 UPV2-0.024 UPV + 31.92MPa, m/s0.89
(Kahraman, 2007)UCS = 9.95 UPV1.21MPa, km/s0.69
(Sharma & Singh, 2008)UCS = 0.0642 UPV − 117.99MPa, m/s0.9
(Chary et al., 2006)UCS = 0.0144 UPV – 24.8560.71
(Altindag, 2012)UCS = 12.746 UPV1.1940.79
UPV & TS(Kurtuluş et al., 2016)TS = 0.008 UPV + 3.84MPa, m/s0.78
UPV & SRNSRN = 0.006 UPV + 9.520.8
SRN & UCS(Gökçeoğlu, 1996)UCS = 0.0001 SRN3.2658MPa0.84
n % & UCS(Palchik, 1999)UCS = 74.4e(−0.04n)MPa0.78
(Kılıç & Teymen, 2008)UCS = 147.16e(−0.0835n)0.93
E & UCS(Bradford et al., 2007)UCS = 2.28 + 4.1089EUCS MPa, E (GPa)---
(Lacy, 1997)UCS = 0.2787E2 + 2.4582EE (Mpsi), UCS (kpsi)0.84

The main aims of this study are first to obtain empirical equations for estimating the physical and mechanical properties of weakly compacted and weakly cemented sandstone employing Schmidt rebound number (SRN), porosity (n), bulk density (ρ), LOI, and UPV measurements. Secondly, to understand and visualize the correlation between the tested variables using the principal component analysis (PCA). Thirdly, to group the studied sandstone samples depending on their physical and mechanical properties, using cluster analysis (CA).

The present research has a general significance, because most previous workers conduct their studies on hard and compacted sandstone. Besides, Nubia sandstone has a high variability of sandstone and could represent the most suitable bedrock of buildings and infrastructures of industrial, tourism, and new urban zones in the studied area (Figure 1(a)).

2. Geological Setting and Location

Nubia sandstone (Taref sandstone Formation) is the most widely distributed sandstone unit having a considerable thickness in the Golden Triangle area, central Eastern Desert, Egypt. This area is covered in its western part by clastic sedimentary rock successions ranging in age from Upper Cretaceous to Quaternary (Said, 1981) (Figure 1(b)). The Nubia sandstone lies unconformably on the Precambrian basement complex and forms the basal unit of the platform sediment succession. In the study area, it composed mainly of massive and cross-bedded sandstone, which was divided into three, four, or five lithologically distinct Facies (Abbass, 1962; Abdel-Wahab & Turner, 1991; Ghanem et al., 1970; Van Houten et al., 1984; Mansour, 1985; Ward & McDonald, 1979) with different nomenclatures and boundaries.

According to Van Houten et al. (1984) Taref sandstone Formation consists mainly of massive and cross-bedded sandstone and can be divided into three lithologically distinct Facies. The lower Facies consists of a succession trough cross-bedded, fining-upward sequences composed of kaolinite-rich, very coarse-grained quartzose sandstone (60 - 70 m thick). The middle Facies consists of thin-bedded, generally finer-grained deposits (15 to 20 m thick), overlain by three parallel-bedded coarsening-upward sequences (5 to 18 m thick) begin with laminated greenish-gray claystone and pass upward through silty clay into ripple- and cross-bedded, fine-grained sandstone. The upper Facies consists of uniform large-scale, tabular-planar-cross-bedded member (15 to 30 m thick), overlain by tens meters of ripple-bedded siltstone and mudstone, which grades upward into Quseir Formation (Van Houten et al., 1984).

3. Materials and Methods3.1. Materials

A total of twenty oriented block sandstone samples were selected based on preliminary stratigraphic observations to ensuring the representation of each litho-type in Nubia sandstone. Macroscopic descriptions of petrographic features of the collected samples were listed in Table 2. A representative sample comprises three specimens of cylindrical and disc-shaped were prepared according to ISRM (Bieniawski & Hawkes, 1978; Fairhurst & Hudson, 1999). The axes of specimens were chosen perpendicular to the bedding planes. The average length to diameter ratios (L/D) is 2.24 and 0.50 for cylindrical and disc-shaped specimens, respectively. Their average diameter is 4.33 cm.

3.2. Methods

In this work, the ρ and n values were determined by saturation and caliper technique, according to ISRM (Brown, 1981). The LOI values were determined

Macroscopic description of petrographic features for the collected block samples
Block IDFaciesMacroscopic description of petrographic featuresLitho-type
U4UpperLight brown bedded, oolitic fine sandstone, inter-bedded with siltstone, bonded with clay matrix and calcareous cementWacke
U3Dark brown massive fine sandstone, bonded with clay matrix, iron oxides, and calcareous cements
U2Light brown bedded fine sandstone, inter-bedded with siltstone, bonded with clay matrix and calcareous cement
U1Light to dark brown, oolitic fine sandstone, inter-bedded with siltstone, bonded with clay matrix and calcareous cement
M6MiddleYellow-dark brown bedded medium sandstone, poorly cemented with silica and iron oxide cementsArenite
M5Brown-grey fine to medium sandstone, well cemented by iron oxides and very frequent calcareous cement concentration
M4White massive fine to medium sandstone, poorly cemented with silica cement
M3Brown-light brown bedded, fine to medium grained sandstone, well cemented by iron oxides cement
M2Yellow violet bedded medium sandstone, well cemented with silica iron oxide and calcareous cements
M1Dark brown fine sandstone, well cemented by iron oxides cement
L10LowerYellow-dark brown bedded medium sandstone, poorly cemented with silica and iron oxides cementsArenite
L9Yellow fine to medium sandstone, poorly cemented with iron oxides cement
L8Mottled creamy white-reddish brown fine sandstone, very frequent iron oxide nodules and clay pockets, bonded with clay matrix and iron oxides cementWacke
L7Light brown bedded fine to medium sandstone, poorly cemented by iron oxides cementArenite
L6Yellow-light red bedded coarse to medium sandstone, weakly cemented by silica and iron oxides cements
L5Dark violet-yellow bedded fine to medium sandstone, well cemented by iron oxides and silica cements
L4Dark violet-white bedded fine to medium sandstone, well cemented by iron oxides and silica cements
L3Yellow - dark grey bedded coarse to medium sandstone, poorly cemented with Iron oxides and silica cements
L2Reddish brown bedded medium to coarse sandstone, with coarse grained small lenses, poorly cemented by Iron oxides and silica cements
L1Mottled yellow-violet fine to coarse sandstone, interbedded with siltstone, very frequent iron oxides nodules, bonded with clay matrix and iron oxide cementWacke

according to Dabrio et al. (2004). The UPV measurements are performed using V-Meter TM (Mark III) ultrasonic tester with a 54 kHz transducer, depending on ISRM standard (Aydin, 2014). UCS of the studied samples was measured using Impact TM loading machine (1000 KN, maximum load), according to ISRM (Fairhurst & Hudson, 1999). The load rate was 0.15 mm/min for most of the tested specimens. The tangential elastic modulus at 50% strain (Et50) was measured and calculated for each specimen according to ISRM (Fairhurst & Hudson, 1999). The Brazilian test was carried out according to ISRM (Bieniawski & Hawkes, 1978), using Matest TM multi-tester (50 KN, maximum load). The Schmidt hammer test was performed directly at several points on each block sample according to ISRM (Aydin, 2009). All tests were conducted in the engineering geology laboratory of South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.

4. Results and Discussions4.1. Physical and Mechanical Results

The results of the physical and mechanical characterization are listed in Table 3.

The results of physical and mechanical properties, LOI, and their descriptive statics
SampleFaciesUPV (m/s)ρ (g/cm3)n (%)LOI (%)Log (LOI)LOI G.SRNUCS (MPa)Et50 (GPa)BTS (MPa)Litho-type
U4Upper1516.701.8328.863.350.53G330.2313.661.851.02Wacke
U33683.102.421.4716.571.22G350.6794.8114.1611.53
U21295.401.8427.884.110.61G327.0812.851.281.51
U11753.101.9822.5212.441.09G330.3319.311.641.91
M6Middle2917.201.8820.002.550.41G234.4424.732.542.06Arenite
M52350.801.9523.080.65−0.19G233.0021.502.142.48
M42107.401.8629.410.20−0.70G130.5216.171.931.56
M32234.501.9424.121.500.18G231.4717.212.031.57
M22574.301.8528.140.08−1.10G131.6414.412.082.41
M12286.901.9825.501.690.23G230.6214.022.671.43
L10Lower2614.302.0620.000.58−0.24G227.9212.192.161.22Arenite
L92457.801.9823.010.55−0.26G229.6412.282.491.41
L82667.102.3112.534.580.66G328.9114.931.171.48Wacke
L72229.501.9724.480.96−0.02G226.6012.033.340.88Arenite
L6---1.9220.001.950.29G222.00---------
L52376.101.9722.370.82−0.09G228.8611.662.791.73
L42355.701.9325.040.70−0.15G227.009.691.961.20
L32407.901.9322.621.750.24G223.145.570.700.74
L22943.701.9818.171.490.17G226.319.562.591.91
L12944.302.2912.554.750.68G336.3223.713.943.62Wacke
Min.1295.401.831.470.08--23.145.570.700.74-
Max.3683.102.4129.4116.57--50.6794.8114.1611.53-
Mean2406.101.1021.703.12--30.7718.972.812.12-
Std. dev.539.280.176.794.32--5.7119.002.852.36-
KMO0.660.720.690.79--0.820.800.850.92Total (0.786)

It is obvious that the average n of the middle Facies samples is mainly higher than that of the lower and the upper Facies, and their average values are 25.04%, 20.08%, and 20.18%, successively. The ρ values are in the range of 1.84 g/cm3 to 2.29 g/cm3 for the studied samples, their average values are 2.03, 1.91, and 2.01 g/cm3 for lower, middle, and upper Facies, successively. Anyway, the studied samples are mainly characterized by low density and high porosity; these give an indication of weakly compacted and weakly cemented sandstones with a shallow burial diagenetic condition.

The integration between LOI, litho-types, and macroscopic description of the studied samples revealed that the LOI values (Table 3) are higher in sandstone samples which characterized by clay or carbonate minerals cement (low silica content samples), these samples include L1, L8, and all samples of upper Facies (U1, U2, U3, and U4). The common logarithmic values (Log) of LOI are used to classify the studied sample into three groups; the first group (G1), the second group (G2) and the third group (G3), these groups have the following Log (LOI) values; “less than - 0.5”, “−0.5 to +0.5” and “more than +0.5”, respectively. Based on this classification, all wacke litho-type samples belong to G3, while all arenite litho-type samples belong to G2, except the high silica content samples (low LOI) belong to G1.

The UPV values of the studied samples are mainly low and ranging from 1295.4 to 3683.1 m/s. Their average values are 2555.2, 2411.9, and 2062.1 m/s for lower, middle, and upper Facies, successively. The UCS values are in the range of 5.57 and 94.81 MPa, while Et50 values are in the range of 0.7 to 14.2 GPa. Based on these values, the tested samples are mainly classified as very low strength rocks (Bieniawski, 1973) with a very low Et50 (Highly yielding), except the U3 sample which is classified as medium strength rock. The BTS values are mainly low and extend from 0.74 to 11.53 MPa. The SRN values are varying between 23.14 and 50.67.

4.2. Statistical Analysis Results4.2.1. Regression Analysis

The linear regression between n and ρ shows a high regression coefficient (R2 = 0.87), the linear regression between UPV and n of all samples shows a high regression coefficient (R2 = 0.64) and this value increased to be 0.974 for G1 samples and 0.825 for G2 samples (Figure 2) when each group correlated separately.

The relationship of LOI with UPV and n can be explained by the truth of the LOI values of sandstone, especially surface sandstone, positively correlated with pores filling materials such as carbonates, sulfates, and clay. These pores filling materials decrease the porosity of sandstone in a dramatic way, and additionally, it increases the strength of uncompacted sandstones.

The linear regression between UPV and ρ does not show a high regression coefficient (0.47), because the relation between UPV and ρ depends on numerous factors such as rock strength and integrity, effective stress, mineral composition, granular structure, cementation, porosity, lithology, saturation, micro-cracks,

fluid pressure, depth of burial, geological age, and many other factors (Horsfall et al., 2017). A moderate correlation (R2 = 0.346) is observed between UPV and UCS, so that the UPV measurement alone does not suitable to predict the strength and deformability of weakly compacted and weakly cemented sandstone, while the SRN has a very high regression coefficient (R2 = 0.94) with UCS, BTS (R2 = 0.78), and Et50 (R2 = 0.85). There is also a high regression of LOI with UCS (R2 = 0.62) and n % (R2 = 0.59), indicating the suitability of these empirical equations to deduce these properties. The values of these properties are represented in correlation point diagrams (Figure 3). The most suitable empirical equations with the highest regression coefficient (R2) are obtained and listed in Table 4.

4.2.2. Principal Components Analysis

To conduct PCA, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measurement is firstly performed (Table 3) to assess sample adequacy. The total KMO value is 0.786. This value gives an indication of sampling adequacy. Secondly, descriptive statics of the studied variables are calculated, these include mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum, their values are also listed in Table 3. Finally, the variables correlation matrix is determined (Table 5) to deduce eigenvalues (Table 6), eigenvectors and factor loadings.

A two-component solution was suggested, based on the correlation between variables and factors “components matrix” (Table 7). The first principal component (F1), which clarifies the largest part of the total variance, has an eigenvalue of 6.17 and represents 77.14% of the total variance. The second principal component (F2) has a variance of 0.94 and accounts for a further 11.77% of the variance. F1 positively correlated with all variables and negatively correlated only with n, while F2 is positively correlated with both ρ and UPV, and negatively correlated with the other variables.

The principal components plot (Figure 4(a)) helps visualize the relations between the studied variables. These variables were illustrated as arrows, and the position to each other explains the relation between them.

The proposed equations for predicting some physical and mechanical prosperity with their input data, units, and regression coefficient (R)
Input dataEmpirical equationRegression
UPV (m/s) & n (%)All samplesn (%) = −10.089 (UPV) + 45.940.641
G1 Samplesn (%) = −0.002 (UPV) + 35.14---
G2 Samplesn (%) = −0.008 (UPV) + 43.280.825
G3 Samplesn (%) = −0.011 (UPV) + 43.590.974
UPV (m/s) & ρ (g/cm3)ρ = 0.2094 (UPV) + 1.49350.468
UPV (m/s) & UCS (MPa)UCS = 20.72 (UPV) − 30.8990.346
SRN & UCS (MPa)UCS = 0.0002 (SRN)3.37090.944
SRN & Et50 (GPa)Et50 = 0.4409 (SRN) − 10.7550.782
SRN & BTS (MPa)BTS = 0.0917e0.0955 (SRN)0.852
n (%) & UCS (MPa)UCS = −26.472 ln(n) + 97.2640.864
LOI (%) & UCS (MPa)UCS = 3.4616 (LOI) + 8.15530.619
LOI (%) & n (%)n (%) = 27.881e−0.119 (LOI)0.589
 Correlation matrix between the studied variables
VariablesUPVρnLOISRNUCSEt50TS
UPV1.0000.688−0.8010.2560.5880.5880.6460.644
ρ0.6881.000−0.9330.5960.6030.6370.6500.671
n−0.801−0.9331.000−0.661−0.680−0.744−0.742−0.773
LOI0.2560.596−0.6611.0000.6890.7870.6970.760
RN0.5880.603−0.6800.6891.0000.9420.8840.928
UCS0.5880.637−0.7440.7870.9421.0000.9580.980
Et500.6460.650−0.7420.6970.8840.9581.0000.963
TS0.6440.671−0.7730.7600.9280.9800.9631.000
 Eigenvalues of correlation matrix
ComponentsF1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8
Eigenvalue6.170.940.570.140.110.030.020.01
Variability (%)77.1511.777.121.771.400.370.280.15
Cumulative %77.1588.9296.0497.8099.2099.5799.85100.00
 Correlations between variables and factors “component matrix”
VariablesF1F2F3F4F5
UPV0.7360.571−0.305−0.170−0.088
ρ0.8160.4030.3470.2080.060
n−0.897−0.359−0.2180.0520.013
LOI0.780−0.3890.446−0.177−0.082
SRN0.909−0.229−0.2080.187−0.204
UCS0.954−0.254−0.1140.0000.019
Et500.940−0.155−0.189−0.0160.221
TS0.965−0.179−0.131−0.0160.053

The arrows of LOI, Et50, BTS, SRN, and USC are pointing in the same direction, so they have a positive relation to each other, and the same for the arrows of ρ and UPV. In contrast, the arrow of n is pointing in the opposite direction of ρ and UPV, so it exhibits a negative relation to them. The arrows of n, ρ, and UPV are stand semi-perpendicular to other variables, so there is a weak relation between them and other variables.

The studied samples depict as points and the coordinates within the diagram, in this multidimensional system are calculated via scores, which are based on the loadings of the components.

4.2.3. Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering

The results of agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC) revealed that the studied samples could cluster into four clusters as shown in the dendrogram (Figure 4(b)). The PCA analyses (Figure 4(a)) help to deduce the factors controlling this classification. Cluster C1 comprises two samples of lower Facies (L1 and L8), the common factors for cluster C1 samples are relatively medium strength, combined with relatively high Log LOI and relatively low porosity. Cluster C2 comprises the rest of Lower and all the Middle Facies samples. The common factors for cluster C2 samples are relatively medium strength, combined with relatively low LOI and relatively high porosity. Clusters C3 comprise all Upper Facies samples except one sample (U3) and its common factors are relatively medium strength, high porosity, and high LOI. While Cluster C4 comprises only one sample (U3), which has relatively high strength, low porosity, and high LOI.

5. Conclusion

Based on the experimental investigation and statistical analysis for physical and mechanical properties of weak Nubia sandstones, the following conclusions are drawn:

1) The studied samples are mainly characterized by low density and high porosity, and these give an indication of weak compaction and weak cementation with shallow burial diagenetic conditions.

2) LOI values are employed to group the studied samples into three groups, G1, G2 and G3. All wacke litho-type samples belong to G3, arenite litho-type samples belong to G2, while very high silica content samples belong to G1. This LOI grouping is very helpful to easily correlate the physical and mechanical properties of similar lithological sandstones with each other and to evaluate the nature of pores filling materials. LOI values are also highly correlated with UCS (R2 = 0.62) and n % (R2 = 0.59).

3) The studied samples are mainly classified as very low strength rocks with low Et50 (Highly yielding).

4) Results of regression analysis showed satisfactory correlations between physical and mechanical characteristics, indicating the suitability of obtained empirical equations to deduce these properties.

5) The UPV measurement alone is not suitable to predict the strength and deformability of weakly compacted and weakly cemented sandstone, while the SRN values are more suitable and highly correlated with UCS (R2 = 0.937), BTS (R2 = 0.976) and Et50 (R2 = 0.944) values.

6) PCA results revealed that the LOI, BTS, SRN, and USC have a positive correlation to each other and weakly correlated with ρ and UPV, which positively correlated to each other and negatively correlated to n. In addition, there is a weak relation of n, ρ and UPV with other variables.

7) The results of AHC revealed that the studied samples cluster into four clusters depending on their USC, LOI, and n %.

Acknowledgements

Sincere thanks to South Valley University, Qena, Egypt, for fully funding this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Cite this paper

Ismaiel, H. A. H., Askalany, M. M., & Ali, A. I. (2021). Statistical Analyses and Geotechnical Evaluation of Nubia Sandstone, Golden Triangle Area, Egypt. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 9, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2021.911004

ReferencesAbbass, H. L. (1962). A Monograph on the Egyptian Cretaceous Pelecypods. United Arab Republic, Ministry of Industry, Geological Survey and Mineral Research De-partment, Geological Museum.Abdel-Wahab, A. A., & Turner, P. (1991). Diagenesis of the Nubia Formation, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 13, 343-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(91)90098-JAbdullah N. H., Sazaly N. N., Awang H., & Hamid N. H. ,et al. (2019). Characterizing P-Wave Velocity and Elastic Properties of Sedimentary Rocks for Foundation of Building Journal of Mechanical Engineering 16, 199-210.Altindag R. ,et al. (2012). Correlation between P-Wave Velocity and Some Mechanical Properties The Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 112, 229-237.Aydin, A. (2009). ISRM Suggested Method for Determination of the Schmidt Hammer Rebound Hardness: Revised Version. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 46, 627-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.01.020Aydin A. ,et al. (2014). Upgraded ISRM Suggested Method for Determining Sound Velocity by Ultrasonic Pulse Transmission Technique Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineer-ing 47, 255-259.Bieniawski Z. T. ,et al. (1973). Engineering Classification of Jointed Rock Masses Civil En-gineer in South Africa 15, 335-343.Bieniawski, Z. T., & Hawkes, I. (1978). Suggested Methods for Determining Tensile Strength of Rock Materials Part 1. Suggested Method for Determining Direct Ten-sile Strength. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 15, 99-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(78)90003-7Bradford, I. D. R., Fuller, J., Thompson, P. J., & Walsgrove, T. R. (2007). Benefits of Assessing the Solids Production Risk in a North Sea Reservoir Using Elastoplastic Modelling. In SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering (pp. 261-269). OnePetro.Brown, E. T. (1981). Rock Characterisation, Testing and Monitoring. ISRM Suggested Methods (211 p). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Ceryan, N., Okkan, U., & Kesimal, A. (2013). Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Carbonate Rocks Using Artificial Neural Networks. Environmental Earth Sciences, 68, 807-819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1783-zChary, K. B., Sarma, L. P., Lakshmi, K. J. P., Vijayakumar, N. A., Lakshmi, V. N., & Rao, M. V. M. S. (2006). Evaluation of Engineering Properties of Rock Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Uniaxial Compressive Strength. In National Seminar on Non-Destructive Evaluation (pp. 379-385). Indian Society for Non-Destructive Testing Hyderabad Chapter.Conoco (1987). Geological Map of Egypt, 1: 500,000, NG36NW-(ASYUT), NG36SW- (LUXOR), NG36NE-(QUSEIR) and NG36SE-(GEBEL HAMATA). The Egyptian Pe-troleum Cooperation.Dabrio, C. J., Santisteban, J. I., Mediavilla, R., Lo, E., Castan, S., Zapata, M. B. R., & Jose, M. (2004). Loss on Ignition: A Qualitative or Quantitative Method for Organic Mat-ter and Carbonate Mineral Content in Sediments. Journal of Paleolimnology, 32, 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPL.0000042999.30131.5bDan, M. B., P&#345;ikryl, R., & T&#246;r&#246;k, á. (Eds.). (2010). Materials, Technologies, and Prac-tice in Historic Heritage Structures. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2684-2Fairhurst C. E., & Hudson J. A. ,et al. (1999). Draft ISRM Suggested Method for the Com-plete Stress-Strain Curve for Intact Rock in Uniaxial Compression International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 36, 281-289.Garia, S., Pal, A. K., Ravi, K., & Nair, A. M. (2019). A Comprehensive Analysis on the Relationships between Elastic Wave Velocities and Petrophysical Properties of Sedimentary Rocks Based on Laboratory Measurements. Journal of Petroleum Ex-ploration and Production Technology, 9, 1869-1881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-0675-0Ghanem, M., Zalata, A., Abd El-Razik, T., Mikhailov, I., Razraliaev, A., & Mirtov, Y. (1970). Stratigraphy of the Phosphate-Bearing Cretaceous and Paleogene Sedi-ments of the Nile Valley between Idfu and Qena (pp. 109-134). Studies on Some Mineral Deposits of Egypt, Geological Survey of Egypt.G&#246;k&#231;eo&#287;lu C. ,et al. (1996). Schmidt sertlik cekici kullan&#305;larak tahmin edilen tek eksenli bas&#305;nc dayan&#305;m&#305; verilerinin guvenirligi uzerine bir degerlendirme Jeoloji Mühendisli&#287;i Dergisi 48, 78-81.Horsfall O. I., Uko E. D. et al. ,et al. (2017). Rock-Physics and Seismic-Inversion Based Reservoir Characterization of AKOS Field, Coastal Swamp Depobelt, Niger Delta, Nigeria IOSR Journal of Applied Geology and Geophysics (IOSR-JAGG) 5, 59-67.Hosseini, M. (2016). The Relationship between P-Wave Velocity and Slake Durability Index. International Journal of Geography and Geology, 5, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.10/2016.5.2/10.2.34.43Hosseini, M., & Shirin, D. (2015). An Estimate of the Tensile Strength Based on P-Wave Velocity and Schmidt Hardness Rebound Number. International Journal of Geography and Geology, 4, 24-36. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.10/2015.4.2/10.2.24.36Kahraman, S. (2007). The Correlations between the Saturated and Dry P-Wave Ve-locity of Rocks. Ultrasonics, 46, 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2007.05.003K&#305;l&#305;&#231;, A., & Teymen, A. (2008). Determination of Mechanical Properties of Rocks Us-ing Simple Methods. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 67, 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-008-0128-3Kurtulu&#351;, C., Sert&#231;elik, F., & Sert&#231;elik, I. (2016). Correlating Physico-Mechanical Properties of Intact Rocks with P-Wave Velocity. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 51, 571-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-015-0145-1Kurtulu&#351;, C., Sert&#231;elik, F., & Sert&#231;elik, I. (2018). Estimation of Unconfined Uniaxial Compressive Strength Using Schmidt Hardness and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity. Tehnicki Vjesnik, 25, 1569-1574. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20170217110722Lacy, L. L. (1997). Dynamic Rock Mechanics Testing for Optimized Fracture Designs. In The SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (pp. 23-36). Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/38716-MSMansour, A. M. (1985). Sedimentological Studies on the Nubia Sandstone, Red Sea, Egypt. Master’s Thesis, Qena: South Valley University.Minaeian, B., & Ahangari, K. (2013). Estimation of Uniaxial Compressive Strength Based on P-Wave and Schmidt Hammer Rebound Using Statistical Method. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6, 1925-1931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-011-0460-yMishra, D. A., & Basu, A. (2012). Use of the Block Punch Test to Predict the Com-pressive and Tensile Strengths of Rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 51, 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.01.016Ozcelik, Y., Bayram, F., & Yasitli, N. E. (2013). Prediction of Engineering Properties of Rocks from Microscopic Data. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6, 3651-3668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0625-3Palchik, V. (1999). Influence of Porosity and Elastic Modulus on Uniaxial Compres-sive Strength in Soft Brittle Porous Sandstones. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engi-neering, 32, 303-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s006030050050Said, R. (1981). The Geological Evolution of the River Nile. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5841-4Schmidt E. ,et al. (1951). A Non-Destructive Concrete Tester Concrete 59, 34-35.Sharma, P. K., & Singh, T. N. (2008). A Correlation between P-Wave Velocity, Impact Strength Index, Slake Durability Index and Uniaxial Compressive Strength. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 67, 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-007-0109-ySoroush, H., Qutob, H., Oil, W., & Me, T. (2011). Evaluation of Rock Properties Using Ultrasonic Pulse Technique and Correlating Static to Dynamic Elastic Constants. In The 2nd South Asian Geoscience Conference and Exhibition, (pp. 12-14). GEO In-dia.Van Houten, F. B., Bhattacharyya, D. P., & Mansour, S. E. I. (1984). Cretaceous Nubia Formation and Correlative Deposits, Eastern Egypt: Major Regres-sive-Transgressive Complex (Natash Basin). Geological Society of America Bulletin, 95, 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1984)95<397:CNFACD>2.0.CO;2Ward, W. C., & McDonald, K. C. (1979). Nubia Formation of Central Eastern Desert, Egypt—Major Subdivisions and Depositional Setting. American Association of Pe-troleum Geologists Bulletin, 63, 975-983. https://doi.org/10.1306/2F9184AF-16CE-11D7-8645000102C1865D