<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJAA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-4717</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijaa.2021.114025</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJAA-113134</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Relativistic Motion with Viscosity: II Stokes’s Law of Resistance
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lorenzo</surname><given-names>Zaninetti</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Physics Department, Turin, Italy</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>10</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>481</fpage><lpage>488</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>15,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>15,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The deduction of a relativistic and mildly relativistic equation of motion in the presence of a drag force proportional to the velocity is presented. The obtained results are used to model the trajectory of the supernova SN1993J and the light curves of gamma-ray bursts.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Supernovae</kwd><kwd> General Supernovae</kwd><kwd> Individual (SN 1993J) ISM</kwd><kwd> Supernova Remnants GRB</kwd><kwd> Individual (GRB 130427A) GRB</kwd><kwd> Individual (GRB 120521C) GRB</kwd><kwd> Individual (GRB 130606A)</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>A relativistic treatment of the equation of motion in the presence of a resistive force proportional to the velocity has been investigated in the following models: a model for the Newtonian scattering of photons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113134-ref1">1</xref>], a motion through a uniform adiabatic medium on the steady-state accretion of matter onto a Schwarzschild black hole [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113134-ref2">2</xref>], an extreme mass-ratio inspirals around strongly accreting supermassive black holes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113134-ref3">3</xref>], and ultra-relativistic detonations in the framework of the cosmological first-order phase transitions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113134-ref4">4</xref>]. In Section 2, this paper explores the relativistic law of motion in the presence of viscosity proportional to the velocity. Section 3 is devoted to the astrophysical applications.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Equation of Motion</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. The Classic Case</title><p>We assume a one-dimensional motion with a resistive force of Stokes type [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113134-ref5">5</xref>], F r e s = − A m v ( t ) , where A is a constant, m is the considered mass and v ( t ) is the velocity. The differential equation which governs the motion is</p><p>v ( t ) = v 0 e − A t e − t 0 A , (1)</p><p>which has an analytical solution in an explicit form</p><p>v ( t ; A , v 0 , t 0 ) = v ( t ) = v 0 e − A t e − t 0 A , (2)</p><p>where v 0 is the velocity at t = t 0 . The equation of motion in the explicit form is</p><p>r ( t ; A , v 0 , t 0 , r 0 ) = − v 0 ( e − A t − e − t 0 A ) e t 0 A A + t 0 (3)</p><p>where r 0 is the distance at t = t 0 . The numerical value of the constant A is</p><p>A = ln ( v 1 v 0 ) t 0 − t 1 , (4)</p><p>where v 1 is the velocity at t = t 1 .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. The Relativistic Case</title><p>We assume a one-dimensional motion with a resistive force of Stokes type, F r e s = − A m 0 v ( t ) , where A is a constant, m 0 is the considered rest mass and v ( t ) is the velocity. Newton’s second law in special relativity is:</p><p>F = d d t ( m 0 v ( t ) 1 − v ( t ) 2 c 2 ) , (5)</p><p>where F is the force, m 0 is the rest mass, c is the velocity of light and v ( t ) is the velocity; see Equation (7.16) in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113134-ref6">6</xref>]. The first order differential equation in the velocity which governs the relativistic motion is</p><p>d d t v ( t ) ( 1 − ( v ( t ) ) 2 c 2 ) 3 2 = − A ( v ( t ) ) . (6)</p><p>An analytical solution to the above first order differential does not exist; however, a solution exists for v ( t ) in an implicit form for the time</p><p>t = N D , (7)</p><p>N = ( − 2 c 3 + 2 c v 0 2 ) c 2 − v 2 − ( ( − 2 t 0 A + ln ( c 2 − v 2 − c )     − ln ( c + c 2 − v 2 ) − ln ( c 2 − v 0 2 − c ) + ln ( c + c 2 − v 0 2 ) ) c 2     − 2 c c 2 − v 0 2 − v 0 2 ( − 2 t 0 A + ln ( c 2 − v 2 − c ) − ln ( c + c 2 − v 2 )     − ln ( c 2 − v 0 2 − c ) + ln ( c + c 2 v 0 2 ) ) ) ( c − v ) ( c + v ) . (8)</p><p>and</p><p>D = 2 A ( c 2 − v 2 ) ( c 2 − v 0 2 ) , (9)</p><p>where v 0 is the velocity at t = t 0 . The constant A can be derived from the following formula</p><p>A = N N D D , (10)</p><p>where</p><p>N N = ( − 2 c 3 + 2 c v 1 2 ) c 2 − v 0 2 + ( c + v 0 ) ( c − v 0 ) ( ( ln ( c 2 − v 1 2 − c )     − ln ( c + c 2 − v 1 2 ) − ln ( c 2 − v 0 2 − c ) + ln ( c + c 2 − v 0 2 ) ) c 2     + 2 c 2 − v 1 2 c − v 1 2 ( ln ( c 2 − v 1 2 − c ) − ln ( c + c 2 − v 1 2 )     − ln ( c 2 − v 0 2 − c ) + ln ( c + c 2 − v 0 2 ) ) ) , (11)</p><p>and</p><p>D D = 2 ( t 0 − t 1 ) ( c 2 − v 1 2 ) ( c 2 − v 0 2 ) , (12)</p><p>where v 1 is the velocity at t = t 1 .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. The Mildly-Relativistic Case</title><p>The first order differential equation for the mildly-relativistic motion is</p><p>d d t v ( t ) + 3 v ( t ) 2 ( d d t v ( t ) ) 2 c 2 = − A v ( t ) , (13)</p><p>which has solution</p><p>v ( t ; t 0 , v 0 ) = e − A t − W ( 3 2 c 2 ( e B ) 2 ( e A t ) 2 ) 2 − B , (14)</p><p>where W is the Lambert W function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113134-ref7">7</xref>] and</p><p>B = − 4 t 0 A c 2 + 4 ln ( v 0 ) c 2 + 3 v 0 2 4 c 2 , (15)</p><p>with v 0 being the velocity at t = t 0 . The trajectory in the mildly relativistic case is</p><p>r ( t ; t 0 , r 0 , v 0 ) = − e t 0 A c 2 v 0 ( W ( D ) + 3 ) ( e v 0 2 c 2 ) 3 4 − 3 e A t e W ( D )   ( ( A r 0 + v 0 ) c 2 + v 0 3 2 ) 3 e W ( D ) e A t c 2 A , (16)</p><p>where</p><p>D = 3 v 0 2 e − 4 ( t − t 0 ) c 2 A + 3 v 0 2 2 c 2 2 c 2 , (17)</p><p>with r 0 being r at t = t 0 . The constant A can be derived in the mildly relativistic case by the following formula</p><p>A ( t 0 , t 1 , v 0 ) = − v 0 2 ( 4 ln ( v 0 v 1 ) c 2 + 3 v 0 2 − 3 v 1 2 ) 4 v 0 2 c 2 ( t 0 − t 1 ) , (18)</p><p>where v 1 is the velocity at t = t 1 .</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Astrophysical Luminosity</title><p>The mechanical relativistic luminosity is</p><p>L m , r = 4 π r ( t ) 2 1 1 − β ( t ) 2 ρ 0 ( r 0 r ) d c 3 β ( t ) , (19)</p><p>where r ( t ) is the temporary radius of the expansion, r 0 is the radius at t = t 0 , ρ 0 is the density at t = t 0 , d is a shape parameter and β ( t ) = v ( t ) c . The observed luminosity, L o b s , is assumed to scale as</p><p>L o b s = C o b s   L m , r   ( 1 − e − τ ν ) , (20)</p><p>where C o b s is a constant that allows the match between theory and observations, and − τ ν is the optical thickness.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Astrophysical Applications</title><p>The astrophysical units are chosen to be pc for the length and years for the time: the constant A is therefore expressed in 1 yr . A test for the quality of the fits is represented by the merit function χ 2</p><p>χ 2 = ∑ j ( r t h − r o b s ) 2 σ o b s 2 ,</p><p>where r t h , r o b s and σ o b s are the theoretical radius, the observed radius and the observed uncertainty, respectively.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Application to SN 1993J</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> reports the numerical trajectory, of SN 1993J for which observational parameters are available [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113134-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113134-ref9">9</xref>] with data as in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Application to GRBs</title><p>A first example is applied to the light curve (LC) of GRB 130427A , which was the most luminous gamma-ray burst in the last 30 years; see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113134-ref10">10</xref>]. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> reports the X-flux as a function of the time and the relative theoretical data, with data as in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Numerical values for the parameters of Stokes’s theoretical model applied to SN 1993J</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >model</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >values</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >χ 2</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stokes’s</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r 0 = 3.0 &#215; 10 − 3     pc ; v 0 = 13800   km / s ; A = 0.07 1 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>A second example is applied to the LC in X-ray of GRB 120521C 2, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113134-ref11">11</xref>], which is reported in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, with temporal behavior of the optical depth as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>A third example is given by the LC in X-ray of GRB 130606A, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113134-ref11">11</xref>], which is reported in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, with the temporal behavior of the optical depth as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Numerical values of the parameters for the theoretical model</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >GRB name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >theoretical parameters</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GRB 130427A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r 0 = 9.9 &#215; 10 − 5     pc ; t 0 = 1.0 &#215; 10 − 3     year ; β 0 = 0.9 ; A = 1 1 pc ; d = 3.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GRB 120521C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r 0 = 1.0 &#215; 10 − 4     pc ; t 0 = 1.0 &#215; 10 − 6     year ; β 0 = 0.9 ; A = 10000 1 pc ; d = 3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GRB 130606A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r 0 = 1.0 &#215; 10 − 4     pc ; t 0 = 1.0 &#215; 10 − 6     year ; β 0 = 0.9 ; A = 1000 1 pc ; d = 2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>We analyzed the one-dimensional relativistic motion in the presence of a resistive force proportional to the velocity. An analytical solution for the velocity was derived in an implicit form, see Equation (7). In the mildly relativistic case, we derived an analytical solution for both the velocity, see Equation (14), and the distance, see Equation (16), in terms of the Lambert W function.</p><p>A first test to evaluate the constant A in an astrophysical environment is on SN 1993J. A full relativistic treatment of the LC for GRBs was done for GRB 130427A, GRB 120521C and GRB 130606A in the framework of the optical thickness with a time dependence.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Zaninetti, L. (2021) Relativistic Motion with Viscosity: II Stokes’s Law of Resistance. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 11, 481-488. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2021.114025</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.113134-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Syer, D. (1994) Relativistic Dynamical Friction in the Weak Scattering Limit. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 270, 205-208. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/270.1.205</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113134-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Petrich, L.I., Shapiro, S.L., Stark, R.F. and Teukolsky, S.A. (1989) Accretion onto a Moving Black Hole: A Fully Relativistic Treatment. Astrophysical Journal, 336, p. 313. https://doi.org/10.1086/167013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113134-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barausse, E. (2007) Relativistic Dynamical Friction in a Collisional Fluid. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 382, 826-834. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12408.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113134-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leitao, L. and Mégevand, A. (2016) Hydrodynamics of Ultra-Relativistic Bubble Walls. Nuclear Physics B, 905, 45-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.02.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113134-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stokes, G.G., et al. (1851) On the Effect of the Internal Friction of Fluids on the Motion of Pendulums. Pitt Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113134-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">French, A.P. (1968) Special Relativity. CRC, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113134-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lambert, J.H. (1758) Observations variae in Mathesin Puram. Acta Helvitica, physico-mathematico-anatomico-botanico-medica, 3, 128.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113134-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marcaide, J.M., Mart-Vidal, I., Alberdi, A., Pérez-Torres, M.A., et al. (2009) A Decade of SN 1993J: Discovery of Radio Wavelength Effects in the Expansion Rate. Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics, 505, 927-945. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912133</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113134-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mart-Vidal, I., Marcaide, J.M., Alberdi, A., Guirado, J.C., Pérez-Torres, M.A. and Ros, E. (2011) Radio Emission of SN1993J: The Complete Picture. II. Simultaneous Fit of Expansion and Radio Light Curves. Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics, 526, Article No. A143. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014517</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113134-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Pasquale, M., Page, M., Kann, D., Oates, S., Schulze, S., Zhang, B., Cano, Z., Gendre, B., Malesani, D., Rossi, A., Gehrels, N., Troja, E., Piro, L., Bo&amp;euml;r, M. and Stratta, G. (2017) Challenging the Forward Shock Model with the 80 Ms Follow up of the X-Ray Afterglow of Gamma-Ray Burst 130427A. Galaxies, 5, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies5010006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113134-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yasuda, T., Urata, Y., Enomoto, J. and Tashiro, M.S. (2017) Hard X-Ray Spectral Investigations of Gamma-Ray Bursts 120521C and 130606A at High-Redshift z ~ 6. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 466, 4558-4567. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw3130</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>