<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Environmental Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-2197</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2021.1211048</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEP-113043</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Anthracene Adsorption to Particles and Water-Stable Aggregates of Mangrove Sediment in Jiulong River Estuary, China
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Wu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bigui</surname><given-names>Lin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>Pan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Beibei</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Institute of Environment and Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Hainan Key Laboratory of Tropical Eco-Circuling Agriculture, Haikou, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>11</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>809</fpage><lpage>823</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>23,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>10,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) pollution in mangroves has drawn much attention, but knowledge of the sorption of PAHs in mangrove sediment is limited. This study investigated the particles and water-stable aggregates (WSA) of mangrove sediment in Jiulong River Estuary, China, and the characteristics of anthracene adsorption to them. The adsorption of anthracene was strongly influenced by the physicochemical and structural properties of sediment particles and WSA. The main sorbents of mangrove sediment were carbonized particles and clays. The porous structure of carbonized particles made it easy to sequestrate sequester the anthracene, and the aging allowed anthracene to move into deeper sites of the carbonized particles. Clays had high anthracene-fixing capacities, and they included organic matters and formed aggregates. The sorption contents coefficient 
  K<sub>f</sub> of anthracene with WSA of different sizes increased in the order 0.063 - 0.25 mm &gt; 0.063 mm &gt; 0.25 - 1.0 mm &gt; 1.0 mm. The order was correlated with which due to the contents and characteristics of organic matters in the aggregates.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>PAH</kwd><kwd> Mangrove</kwd><kwd> Sediment</kwd><kwd> Particle</kwd><kwd> Aggregates</kwd><kwd> Sorption</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a group of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) that are ubiquitous in the environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref2">2</xref>]. They have been of particular concern due to their carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and toxicity to biota. Mangroves are important inter-tidal estuarine wetlands along the coastlines of tropical and subtropical regions with important environmental protection functions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref4">4</xref>]. Human activities in coastal areas extremely increased in recent years and made mangroves suffer great environmental pressures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref6">6</xref>]. Over the past few decades, mangrove wetlands have been exposed to multiple poisonous PAHs due to various kinds of human activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>Biodegradation by indigenous degrading microbes and phytoremediation are important processes for PAHs-contaminated mangrove sediments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref14">14</xref>]. However, the feasibility and effectiveness of biodegradation are strongly affected by the accessibility and bioavailability of PAHs in sediment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref16">16</xref>], which were depended on the particle size distribution and aggregation of soil and sediment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref18">18</xref>]. The previous study showed different sized particles perform as different “pools” for PAHs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref20">20</xref>]. Thus, the distribution of PAHs in soil particles could affect the bioremediation of these pollutants. Especially after long years of aging, these compounds can move into the inaccessible compartments of soil particles and lead to sequestration, which may reduce extractability and result in low bioavailability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref25">25</xref>]. Therefore, it is important to study the sorption of PAHs in mangrove sediment particles and aggregates. Many studies have focused on the distribution of PAHs in different particles of surface soils or sediments, but the results are various because of different sampling sites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref26">26</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref31">31</xref>].</p><p>The mangrove sediment has unique properties such as organic-rich matters and fine grains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref3">3</xref>]. It was also under a flooded condition which can damage its physical structures through physical dispersion. So that, the particles and water-stable aggregates of mangrove sediment are important for the sorption of PAHs and then influence their degradation. However, the physical composition and structural properties of the mangrove sediments were not reported and its relationship with the sorption of PAHs in sediments was unknown. This study aims at investigating the particles and water-stable aggregates of mangrove sediments and the sorption of a typical PAH, anthracene in these particles and water-stable aggregates.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Chemicals</title><p>Standard of anthracene (&gt;99% purity) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (USA). The stock solution of anthracene was prepared by dissolving an appropriate amount of regent in anhydrous ethanol, with a final concentration of 100 mg/L. The stock solution was kept in a brown bottle at 4˚C and wrapped with aluminium foil to avoid any light exposure prior to use. Working solutions of anthracene were prepared by transferring small aliquots of each stock solution into several glass tubes. After allowing evaporation of the solvent by a gentle flow of high-purity nitrogen gas (≥99.99%), Mill-Q water was added to the mark of all the colorimetric tubes to obtain a series of the PAHs working solutions for sorption experiment. The trichloromethane and methanol used for PAH analysis were HPLC-grade solvents purchased from Tedia (USA). The calcium chloride (CaCl<sub>2</sub>) used for adsorption experiment was analysis grade purchased Sigma Aldrich (USA).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sediment</title><p>The surface (0 - 10 cm) sediment sample was collected from the mangrove wetland (24˚29'N, 117˚55'E) in Jiulong River Estuary, which is one of the largest river/estuary systems in south China and is the major drinking water source for Xiamen and the main freshwater source for its sea area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref11">11</xref>]. The wet sediment was brought back to the laboratory and used for separating particles and water-stable aggregates immediately. The other portion of sampled sediment was air-dried and passed through a 2 mm sieve and the dry sieved sediment was used for the anthracene sorption experiment.</p><p>Selected properties of the mangrove sediment were determined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref32">32</xref>] and as follows: pH (in H<sub>2</sub>O) 6.66, organic matter 28.4 g/kg, total N 1.13 g/kg, total P 0.85 g/kg, and total K 19.2 g/kg. The background concentrations of the studied PAHs in the sediment proved to be &lt;2% of the lab-added concentrations.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Sediment Particle Separation</title><p>The sediment was physically separated by a size and density separation method as described by Ghosh (2000) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref26">26</xref>]. Wet sieving was first performed to separate the sediment into four size fractions (&gt;1.0, 1.0 - 0.25, 0.25 - 0.063, and &lt;0.063 mm). The larger size fractions (&gt;0.063 mm) comprised primarily of sand grains, coal-derived particles, and woody material. It was possible to wash off the lighter fractions (coal and wood) from the heavier sand by swirling with water in a beaker and draining off the entrained lighter particles. Materials in the fine fraction (&lt;0.063 mm) were density separated using a cesium chloride solution having a specific gravity of 1.8. Five grams of wet sediment and 40 mL of cesium chloride solution were centrifuged at 200 rpm for 10 min in 50 mL glass centrifuge tubes. The fine coal-derived and wood particles floated, were decanted, and were collected on filter paper and rinsed with water several times. The heavy clay and silt fractions were similarly washed several times to remove cesium chloride. Each of these sizes and density separated fractions was then weighted and investigated for particle structures by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, HITACHI S-4800 FE-SEM).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Sediment Water-Stable Aggregates (WSA) Separation</title><p>The WSA of the sediment was analyzed by using a slight modification of the wet-sieving technique described by Elliott (1986) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref33">33</xref>]. Briefly, the moist sediment samples were wet sieved manually through a series of three sieves to obtain four size fractions: (&gt;1.0, 1.0 - 0.25, 0.25 - 0.063, and &lt;0.063 mm). The WSA in each size fraction was collected, dried and weighed.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. PAH Sorption in Sediment Particles</title><p>The PAH contaminated sediments were prepared according to the method described by Hatzinger and Alexander (1995) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref34">34</xref>]. The dry sieved sediments were sterilized by an autoclave at 103.4 kPa and 121.3˚C for 2 h to prevent any microbial activity during the sorption experiment. 500 ng/mL anthracene was prepared by taking 250 μL of anthracene stock solutions to a 50 mL brown volumetric flask; methanol was added to the mark after allowing evaporation of the solvent by a gentle flow of high-purity nitrogen gas (≥99.99%). Then 20.00 g portions of sterilized sediments were added to sterilized 50 mL screw-cap test tubes. To each tube was added 2 mL anthracene solution. The liquid was added dropwise to bring the anthracene concentration to 50 ng/g dry weight (dw) sediment.</p><p>Several tubes were placed in a hood for 1 h, and the samples were shaken to allow the methanol to evaporate and to ensure thorough mixing of PAH with the sediments. Deionized water was then added to bring the moisture level of sediments to 50% (W/W); and the other tubes with PAH contaminated sediments incubated in the dark at 20˚C &#177; 1˚C for aging 100 d [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref36">36</xref>].</p><p>The fresh and aged PAH contaminated sediments were size and density separated by the method described above, each of these sizes and density separated fractions were then analyzed for PAH concentration by GC-MS.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. PAHs Sorption in WSA</title><p>The WSA of sediment with four size fractions (&gt;1.0, 1.0 - 0.25, 0.25 - 0.063, and &lt;0.063 mm) were obtained by wet sieving and each aggregate fraction was air-dried and sterilized at 103.4 kPa, 121.3˚C for 2 h to remove the effect of microorganisms. The sorption isotherm experiments of anthracene on each size of WSA were conducted. According to the preliminary experiment, the appropriate ratio of water to soil was 25 to 1; the initial concentrations of anthracene in 0.01 mol/L CaCl<sub>2</sub> solutions were between 5.0 μg/L to 100.0 μg/L, and the equilibration time was 48 h. 100 μg/mL HgCl<sub>2</sub> was contained in each colorimetric tube to inhibit microbial activity during the experimental process. Transfer 0.20 g dried sediment aggregate sample into a series of 10 mL glass tubes with caps, and then each of them was spiked with 5 mL individual anthracene solution. The tube caps were sealed tightly with Parafilm to prevent the loss of PAH from solvent evaporation. The sealed tubes were rotated in a rocking bed in dark with a speed of 45 rpm for 48 h at room temperature. After 48 h, samples were centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 25 min. The supernatants were transferred to the amber glass vials, and the concentrations of anthracene in supernatants were determined by the GC-MS.</p><p>All of the sorption isotherm experimental data were fitted to two sorption models: the Linear model and Freundlich model, which were usually used to describe sorption behaviour of organic pollutants in soil or sediment. Linear model is described as the equation q<sub>e</sub> = K<sub>d</sub>C<sub>e</sub> and the Freundlich model is described as the equation q e = K f C e n , where q<sub>e</sub> (μg/kg) is the amount of the anthracene adsorbed by sediment, C<sub>e</sub> (μg/L) is the anthracene concentration remaining in equilibrium in the solution, K<sub>d</sub> (L/kg) is the partition coefficient of the Linear model, K<sub>f</sub> (μg/kg)/(μg/L)<sup>n</sup> and n are Freundlich constants (K<sub>f</sub> related to sorption capacity and n related to the sorption intensity). q<sub>e</sub> is calculated by the equation q<sub>e</sub> = (C<sub>0</sub> − C<sub>e</sub>) &#215; V/m, where C<sub>0</sub> is the initial concentration of anthracene in solution, V is the volume of solution and m was the mass of sediment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref37">37</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. PAH Analysis</title><p>PAH in sediments were extracted by a method reported by Tam et al. (2001) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref38">38</xref>]. Ten grams of freeze-dried sediment sample was ultrasonicated with 50 mL mixture of trichloromethane and methanol (2:1 v/v) in an ultrasonic bath for 15 min. The second extraction was conducted with 50 mL mixture of trichloromethane and methanol (1:2 v/v). The two extracts were combined and 45 mL Milli-Q water was added to discard the methanol phase. The extract was concentrated to around 1 mL by rotary evaporation at 23˚C. The PAH in supernatants was also ultrasonicated with trichloromethane (1:1 v/v) twice and the two extracts were mixed.</p><p>The obtained extracts were dehydrated with anhydrous sodium sulfate, then reduced by a rotary evaporator to about 1 mL and cleaned up with silica gel columns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref39">39</xref>] and then determined by a GC-MS (Thermo TSQ Quanum GC, USA). The determination conditions were as follows, the column was TR-5MS (30 m &#215; 0.25 mm &#215; 0.25 μm), the injector temperature was 260˚C, the oven temperature was to increase from 60˚C to 200˚C at 25˚C/min and then to 310˚C at 8˚C/min, under the selected ions monitoring mode, the mass to charge ratio was set at 128 m/z in the first eight minutes, at 178 m/z from the eighth minute to the fourteenth minute, and 252 m/z from the fourteenth minute to the twenty-third minute, the solvent delay was set at four minutes, helium was used as the carrier gas, and the flowing rate of carrier gas was 1 mL/min. The recoveries of PAHs in water and soil were 97% - 105% and 87.3% - 91.66% respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Statistical Analyses</title><p>All of these experiments were performed in triplicates and the results presented were average values of the three replicates. Data were analyzed statistically using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range tests were employed to determine the significance of the differences between the parameters. The statistical package used was the SPSS statistical software package (Version 11.0) and the confidence limit was 95%.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Sediment Particle Characterization</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> presents the proportions of each size and density separated fraction in the sediment. Heavy fractions in the sediment constituted about 99% of the</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Type and mass percentage of particles in different sizes and density fractions of sediment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Size (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Heavy fraction</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Light fraction</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Particle type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of whole sediment mass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Particle type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of whole sediment mass</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plant residue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.310</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25 - 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plant debris</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >fine sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.063 - 0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coal, coke</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.735</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >dilt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.063</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silt, clay</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>sediment mass, while light fractions constituted the remaining 1% of the sediment weight. The most abundant component in the mangrove sediment is &lt;0.063 mm heavy fraction which occupied 92% of the whole sediment weight. The content of the light fraction with the size of 0.063 - 0.25 mm was higher than the other size light fractions.</p><p>Particle structures in each size and density separated fraction were then investigated using SEM, and the results are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows that the particles in the light fractions of the mangrove sediment are mainly structural organic materials, including plant residues and fragments and carbonaceous particles (such as coal dust, coke, and so on). Plant residues and fragments is the plant residue suffering natural wear and decay which retained some plant tissue structure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)); Carbonaceous particles are the product of coal in the use of leakage and transportation or by the product of high-temperature combustion which is irregular globular and has obvious porosity structure, and with the size of 0.063 - 0.25 mm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(d)).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows that the particles in the heavy fractions of the mangrove sediment are mainly sand, silt, clay and other inorganic minerals. The sand particles are single grains, and with larger grain size which is more distributed in the fractions of &gt;0.25 mm size (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)); the clay particles are composite grain and have laminated structure; the particle size is small and is more distributed in the fraction of &lt;0.063 mm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)).</p><p>In addition, sediment aggregates particles were observed in &gt;1.0 mm heavy fractions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c)) which indicates a stable structure contrary to the unconsolidated sediment. According to the development model of aggregates proposed by Tisdall and Oades (1982) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref40">40</xref>], the formation of aggregates maybe because the mangrove sediment had a high content of organic matters and clays which offer a wealth of organic and inorganic colloid to form organic substance-inorganic mineral aggregates.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. The Distribution of PAH in Sediment Particles</title><p>The concentrations of unaged and aged anthracene in each size and density separated fraction were analyzed and the results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The heavy fractions sorbed 83% of anthracene and the light fractions sorbed 17% of anthracene. But from the weight of each component, the amounts of sorbed anthracene per light fraction unit were much higher than that of heavy fraction. After aging, the proportion of sorbed anthracene in &lt;0.063 mm fraction decreased, but the proportion of sorbed anthracene in &gt;1.0 mm heavy fraction obviously increased. The proportion of sorbed anthracene in each light fraction all increased.</p><p>Plant residues and detritus had large sizes and visible porous structures, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b). Coal-derived particles had smaller sizes (mostly existed in the 0.063 - 0.25 mm fractions), and deeper pores (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(g), and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(h)). The large surface area and porous structures of these particles were easy to sequestrate PAH molecules, and this is why light fractions absorbed more PAHs than heavy fractions. The previous studies also found coal and coal-derived particles were dominant geosorbents for PAHs in a river floodplain soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref43">43</xref>]. And with the time increased, PAH molecules may move into deeper positions of the particles and difficult to be extracted, thus, the</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution proportions and weight values* of unaged and aged anthracene in different size and density separated fractions</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Size and density separated fractions</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Unaged anthracene</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Aged anthracene</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of the total amount</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of the total amount</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heavy &lt; 0.063 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heavy 0.063 - 0.25 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heavy 0.25 - 1.0 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heavy &gt; 1.0 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sum of heavy fractions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Light 0.063 - 0.25 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Light 0.25 - 1.0 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Light &gt; 1.0 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sum of light fractions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.12</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Weight = Proportions of anthracene distributed to each fraction (%)/Proportions of each fraction in sediment mass (%).</p><p>contents of the PAH in this fraction increased after aging.</p><p>The main particles in 0.063 - 0.25 mm and 0.25 - 1.0 mm heavy fractions, sand and silt, had low sorption capacity of PAHs. That is why the contents of PAHs in these fractions were smaller than others. Clays that existed in &lt;0.063 mm fraction have stratified structures and large surface areas, thus easy to absorb PAHs. Moreover, the clays made up a high proportion of the mangrove sediment and thus they absorbed most of PAHs. After aging, the contents of the PAHs decreased in &lt;0.063 mm fraction, but increased in &gt;1.0 mm, heavy fraction. It was probably because aging caused the PAHs to penetrate deeper into sediment aggregates, which were observed in &gt;1.0 mm, heavy fraction.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. The Physical Structure and Chemical Properties of Sediment Aggregates</title><p>The above experiment results showed that sediment aggregates affected the PAHs sorption obviously. So we did further study focused on the characters of sediment aggregates and PAHs sorption in which. The microstructure of WSA with different sizes of the sediment was investigated by using SEM, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows that the inorganic mineral particles in the sediment bond together or adhere to the skeleton particles and shape microorganisms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)); then the microaggregate bond together and form macroaggregate which is arranged by single grain and have pore between crumb (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d)). Tisdall and Oades (1982) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113043-ref40">40</xref>] proposed an aggregate development model, which described that the primary mineral particles and bacteria, fungi and plants debris first cemented to microaggregates, then these free microaggregate was bound together by instantaneous degeneration</p><p>cementing agent (microorganisms and plant polysaccharides) and temporary cementing agent (root and fungal mycelium) and formed macroaggregate. The result was consistent with our experimental observation results.</p><p>The chemical properties of sediment aggregate are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows that TOC content of aggregate with different size were decreased in the order 0.063 - 0.25 mm &gt; 0.25 - 1.0 mm &gt; 1.0 mm &gt; 0.063 mm. This phenomenon can be explained by the particle components of the sediment as discussed above. The plant debris and carbonaceous particles mainly distribute in the fraction of 0.25 - 1.0 mm and 0.063 - 0.25 mm (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), which made the higher TOC content of the aggregates with these two sizes. The value of C/N of the aggregates is in accordance with the TOC content. The BC content of aggregate with different size decreased in the order 0.063 - 0.25 mm &gt; 0.063 mm &gt; 0.25 - 1.0 mm &gt; 1.0 mm, which are different with the order of TOC content. It indicated that the organic components of the aggregates with different size are different; and the aggregates with the size of 0.063 - 0.25 mm and &lt;0.063 mm had more compactness organic matter. The specific surface area of aggregate increased with the particle size.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. PAH Sorption in Sediment Aggregates</title><p>The sorption isotherm data for anthracene in different size aggregates are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. The fitting parameters from the Linear model and Freundlich model are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, it can be seen that both Linear and Freundlich models fit the experimental data very well. For most of the four aggregate sizes, the Freundlich model had higher R<sup>2</sup> values, which indicated that Freundlich model fit the data better than Linear model. Based on Freundlich model parameters, the sorption capacities of these different aggregates were observed to follow the order: 0.063 - 0.25 mm aggregate &gt; 0.25 - 1.0 mm aggregate &gt; 0.063 mm aggregate &gt; 1.0 mm aggregate. From the TOC and C/N values of different size aggregates, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, it can be seen that, the higher sorption capacity of 0.063 - 0.25 mm aggregate can be explained by its higher TOC and C/N.</p><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, it can also be seen that the n values of Freundlich model for most types of aggregates were less than 1, which indicated that the sorption of PAHs on these aggregates was nonlinear. The n value of &gt; 1.0 mm aggregates was smaller than that of others, which indicated that the non-Linearity of the sorption of PAH in &gt; 1.0 mm aggregates was higher than that of others. That may be</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Selected characteristics of sediment aggregates with different sizes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Size (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TOC (g/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N (g/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C/N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BC (g/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Specific surface area (m<sup>2</sup>/g)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.36<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.04<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.35<sup>d </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25 - 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.76<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.37<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.063 - 0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.07<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.44<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.51<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.51<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.063</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.18<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.95<sup>a</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The different superscript lower-case letters in each column indicate significant differences.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> The sorption parameters of anthracene in sediment aggregates with different sizes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Aggergate size</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Linear model</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Freundlich model</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>d</sub>(L/kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>f</sub>(μg/kg)/(μg/L)<sup>n</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;1.0 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >231.73 &#177; 25.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9821</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >470.92 &#177; 72.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71 &#177; 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9844</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25 - 1.0 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >361.43 &#177; 25.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9920</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >536.93 &#177; 37.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9963</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.063 - 0.25 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >690.08 &#177; 65.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9862</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >863.72 &#177; 78.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83 &#177; 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9854</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.063 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >315.53 &#177; 18.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9943</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >529.15 &#177; 17.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9993</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>caused by the heterogenic surfaces of the bigger aggregates, which were the combinations of organic matters and minerals.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The results showed that the sorption of anthracene was strongly influenced by the physicochemical and structural properties of sediment particles and WSA. The main sorbents of mangrove sediment were carbonized particles and clays. The porous structure of carbonized particles made it easy to sequestrate the PAH, and the aging made the PAH come into deeper sites of the carbonized particles; clays had good PAH-fixing capacities and they always combined by organic matters and formed aggregates; the sorption contents K<sub>f</sub> of the PAH in WSA with different size increased in the order 0.063 - 0.25 mm &gt; 0.063 mm &gt; 0.25 - 1.0 mm &gt; 1.0 mm , and the differences were due to the contents and characters of organic matters in aggregates.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the Hainan Provincial Key Research and Development Projects (ZDYF2021SHFZ066, ZDYF2019221), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41301555).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Wu, L., Lin, B.G., Pan, P. and Liu, B.B. (2021) Anthracene Adsorption to Particles and Water-Stable Aggregates of Mangrove Sediment in Jiulong River Estuary, China. Journal of Environmental Protection, 12, 809-823. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2021.1211048</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.113043-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shen, H.Z., Huang, Y., Wang, R., Zhu, D., Li, W., Shen, G.F., Wang, B., Zhang, Y.Y., Chen, Y.C., Lu, Y., Chen, H., Li, T.C., Sun, K., Li, B.G., Liu,W.X., Liu, J.F. and Tao, S. (2013) Global Atmospheric Emission of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from 1960 to 2008 and Future Prediction. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 47, 6415-6424. https://doi.org/10.1021/es400857z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bayen, S. (2012) Occurrence, Bioavailability and Toxic Effects of Trace Metals and Organic Contaminants in Mangrove Ecosystems: A Review. Environment International, 48, 84-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.07.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Z.W., Xu, X.R., Sun, Y.X., Yu, S., Chen, Y.S. and Peng, J.X. (2014) Heavy metal and Organic Contaminants in Mangrove Ecosystems of China: A Review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21, 11938-11950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3100-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Y.S. and Gu, J.D. (2021) Ecological Responses, Adaptation and Mechanisms of Mangrove Wetland Ecosystem to Global Climate Change and Anthropogenic Activities. International Biodeterioration &amp; Biodegradation, 162, Article ID: 105248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2021.105248</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raza, M., Zakaria, M.P., Hashim, N.R., Yim, U.H., Kannan, N. and Ha, S.Y. (2013) Composition and Source Identification of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Mangrove Sediments of Peninsular Malaysia: Indication of Anthropogenic Input. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70, 2425-2436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2279-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neba, G., Anyinkeng, N., Mumbang, C. and Fonge, A. (2021) Benthic Algal Community in Relationship to Perturbation in the Tiko Mangrove Estuary Cameroon. Open Journal of Ecology, 11, 540-564. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2021.117035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qiu, Y.W., Qiu, H.L., Li, J. and Zhang, G. (2018) Bioaccumulation and Cycling of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Typical Mangrove Wetlands of Hainan Island, South China. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 75, 464-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-018-0548-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balu, S., Bhunia, S., Gachhui, R. and Mukherjee, J. (2020) Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Contamination in the Sundarbans, the World’s Largest Tidal Mangrove Forest and Indigenous Microbial Mixed Biofilm-Based Removal of the Contaminants. Environmental Pollution, 266, Article ID: 115270.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115270</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Verane, J., dos Santos, N.C.P., da Silva, V.L., de Almeida, M., de Oliveira, O.M.C. and Moreira, í.T.A. (2020) Phytoremediation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Mangrove Sediments Using Rhizophora mangle. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 160, Article ID: 111687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111687</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garcia, M.R. and Martins, C.C. (2021) A Systematic Evaluation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in South Atlantic Subtropical Mangrove Wetlands under a Coastal Zone Development Scenario. Journal of Environmental Management, 277, Article ID: 111421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111421</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tian, Y., Liu, H.J., Zheng, T.L., Kwon, K.K., Kim, S.J. and Yan, C.L. (2008) PAHs Contamination and Bacterial Communities in Mangrove Surface Sediments of the Jiulong River Estuary, China. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 57, 707-715.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.03.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wongwongsee, W., Chareanpat, P. and Pinyakong, O. (2013) Abilities and Genes for PAH Biodegradation of Bacteria Isolated from Mangrove Sediments from the Central of Thailand. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 74, 95-104.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moghadam, M.S., Ebrahimipour, G., Abtahi, B., Ghassempour, A. and Hashtroudi, M.S. (2014) Biodegradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by a Bacterial Consortium Enriched from Mangrove Sediments. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 12, Article No. 114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40201-014-0114-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bacosa, H.P. and Inoue, C. (2015) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Biodegradation Potential and Diversity of Microbial Consortia Enriched from Tsunami Sediments in Miyagi, Japan. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 283, 689-697.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.068</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, J.L., Wong, Y.S. and Tam, N.F.Y. (2009) Static and Dynamic Sorption of Phenanthrene in Mangrove Sediment Slurry. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 168, 1422-1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, J.L., Wong, M.H., Wong, Y.S. and Tam, N.F.Y. (2011) Modeling Sorption and Biodegradation of Phenanthrene in Mangrove Sediment Slurry. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 190, 409-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weissenfels, W.D., Klewer, H.J. and Langhoff, J. (1992) Adsorption of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) by Soil Particles: Influence on Biodegradability and Biotoxicity. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 36, 689-696.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183251</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lu, Z., Zeng F.G., Xue, N.D. and Li, F.S. (2012) Occurrence and Distribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Organo-Mineral Particles of Alluvial Sandy Soil Profiles at a Petroleum-Contaminated Site. Science of the Total Environment, 433, 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Müller, S., Wilcke, W., Kanchanakool, N. and Zech, W. (2000) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Particle-Size Separates of Urban Soils in Bangkok, Thailand. Soil Science, 165, 412-419.https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-200005000-00005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krauss, M. and Wilcke, W. (2002) Sorption Strength of Persistent Organic Pollutants in Particle-Size Fractions of Urban Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 430-437. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.4300</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reid, B.J., Jones, K.C. and Semple, K.T. (2000) Bioavailability of Persistent Organic Pollutants in Soils and Sediments—A Perspective on Mechanisms, Consequences and Assessment. Environmental Pollution, 108, 103-112.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00206-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amellal, N., Portal, J.M. and Berthelin, J. (2001) Effect of Soil Structure on the Bioavailability of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons within Aggregates of a Contaminated Soil. Applied Geochemistry, 16, 1611-1619.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00034-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amellal, N., Portal, J.M., Vogel, T. and Berthelin, J. (2001) Distribution and Location of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and PAH-Degrading Bacteria within Polluted Soil Aggregates. Biodegradation, 12, 49-57.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011909107858</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, Q., Li, F.S. and Hong, C. (2007) Aging Behaviour of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Organo-Mineral Aggregates from Black Soil. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 27, 937-940.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haritash, A.K. and Kaushik, C.P. (2009) Biodegradation Aspects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): A Review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 169, 1-15.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.137</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghosh, U., Gillette, J.S., Luthy, R.G. and Zare, R.N. (2000) Microscale Location, Characterization, and Association of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons on Harbor Sediment Particles. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 34, 1729-1736.https://doi.org/10.1021/es991032t</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, X.C., Zhang, Y.X. and Chen, R.F. (2001) Distribution and Partitioning of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Different Size Fractions in Sediments from Boston Harbor, United States. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42, 1139-1149.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00129-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rockne, K.J., Shor, L.M., Young, L.Y., Taghon, G.L. and Kosson, D.S. (2002) Distributed Sequestration and Release of PAHs in Weathered Sediment: The Role of Sediment Structure and Organic Carbon Properties. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 36, 2636-2644. https://doi.org/10.1021/es015652h</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Talley, J.W., Ghosh, U., Tucker, S.G., Furey, J.S. and Luthy, R.G. (2002) Particle-Scale Understanding of the Bioavailability of PAHs in Sediment. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 36, 477-483. https://doi.org/10.1021/es010897f</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ni, J.Z., Luo, Y.M., Wei, R. and Li, X.H. (2008) Distribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Particle Size Separates and Density Fractions of Typical Agricultural Soils in the Yangtze River Delta, East China. European Journal of Soil Science, 59, 1020-1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01066.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, Y., Ligouis, B., Pies, C., Grathwohl, P. and Thilo, H. (2008) Occurrence of Coal and Coal-Derived Particle-Bound Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in a River Floodplain Soil. Environmental Pollution, 151, 121-129.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.02.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Page, A.L. (1982) Methods of Soil Analysis. 2nd Edition, ASA Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elliott, E.T. (1986) Aggregate Structure and Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus in Native and Cultivated Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50, 627-633.https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030017x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hatzinger, P.B. and Alexander, M. (1995) Effects of Aging of Chemicals in Soil on Their Biodegradability and Extractability. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 29, 537-545. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00002a033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, J.G., Sun, H.W. and Zhang, Y. (2007) Desorption of Pyrene from Freshly-Amended and Aged Soils and Its Relationship to Bioaccumulation in Earthworms. Soil and Sediment Contamination, 16, 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320380601079665</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maliszewska-Kordybach, B. (2005) Dissipation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Freshly Contaminated Soils—The Effect of Soil Physicochemical Properties and Aging. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 168, 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-0940-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mechlińska, A., Gdaniec-Pietryka, M., Wolska, L. and Namie&amp;sacute;nik, J. (2009) Evolution of Models for Sorption of PAHs and PCBs on Geosorbents. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 28, 466-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2009.01.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tam, N.F.Y., Ke, L., Wang, X.H. and Wong, Y.S. (2001) Contamination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Surface Sediments of Mangrove Swamps. Environmental Pollution, 114, 255-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00212-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, J., Cai, L.Z., Yuan, D.X. and Chen, M. (2004) Distribution and Sources of Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Mangrove Surficial Sediments of Deep Bay, China. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 49, 479-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.02.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tisdall, J.M. and Oades, J.M. (1982) Organic Matter and Water-Stable Aggregates in Soils. Journal of Soil Science, 33, 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01755.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Flores-Cervantes, D.X., Plata, D.L., MacFarlane, J.K., Reddy, C.M. and Gschwend, P.M. (2009) Black Carbon in Marine Particulate Organic Carbon: Inputs and Cycling of Highly Recalcitrant Organic Carbon in the Gulf of Maine. Marine Chemistry, 113, 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2009.01.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sánchen-García, L., Cato, I. and Gustafsson, &amp;Ouml;. (2010) Evaluation of the Influence of Black Carbon on the Distribution of PAHs in Sediments from along the Entire Swedish Continental Shelf. Marine Chemistry, 119, 44-51.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2009.12.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113043-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xia, X.H., Li, Y.R., Zhou, Z. and Feng, C.L. (2010) Bioavailability of Adsorbed Phenanthrene by Black Carbon and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes to Agrobacterium. Chemosphere, 78, 1329-1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.01.007</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>