<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2021.1111132</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-113000</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Surgical Management of Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Women: Outcome and Quality of Life Assessment
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dana</surname><given-names>Sawan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cyril</surname><given-names>Touboul</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Barbara</surname><given-names>Hersant</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jean</surname><given-names>Paul Meningaud</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Aesthetic and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Unit of Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Gynaecology and Reproduction Medicine Unit of Tenon Hospital, Paris, France</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>11</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1425</fpage><lpage>1436</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background
  :
   Hidradenitis suppurativa
   
  (HS) or Acne inversa sometimes referred to as Verneuil’s disease
  ,
   is a rare and debilitating condition arising in the intertriginous folds that bear apocrine glands (axillae, groin, perineum, pubis, ano-genital area). It has a deleterious impact on the life of affected persons who tend to be more depressive and poorly socially and sexually connected because of pain, malodor and stigmatization. <b>Methods</b>
  <b>:</b>
  <b> </b>
  We conducted a retrospective study in Henri Mondor Hospital in Cr&#233;teil, France, in order to assess the effectiveness of surgery as a radical treatment and also assess the factors related to recurrence and the surgical and sexual satisfaction in women operated for severe HS of perineum and genitalia.
   
  <b>Results</b>
  <b>:</b>
   Fifty-five women were included. We got a recurrence rate of 23.6%. 66.7% of recurrence occurred after localized excision. 83% of patients were satisfied with surgery results and would undergo a revision surgery or recommend it. The factors significantly associated with recurrence were overweight (p = 0.0046), location in groin (p = 0.0040), localized excision (p = 0.02), total excision (p = 0.009), healing via secondary intention (p = 0.001) and disability due to HS (p = 0.006). Assessment of sexual response thanks to the FSFI showed an alteration of all the domains of sexual response but the composite index of 18.51 was below the threshold to diagnose pathologic sexual condition.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Hidradenitis Suppurativa</kwd><kwd> Acne Inversa</kwd><kwd> Wide Excision</kwd><kwd> Recurrence</kwd><kwd> Surgical Satisfaction</kwd><kwd> Female Sexual Function Index</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), also called Acne inversa or Verneuil’s disease, was first described by Velpeau in 1839. Verneuil named the condition and associated it with sweat glands in 1854. It is in 1939 that the relation with apocrine glands was described by Brunstig [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref2">2</xref>]. It is a chronic and recurrent condition arising in apocrine gland bearing skin in the body folds, especially the groin and the armpit, causing painful abscesses and scarring. At the beginning, it presents as subcutaneous nodules. Later, those nodules may coalesce to form dermal painful abscesses or rupture leading to purulent and offensive smelling discharge. Finally, the abscesses heal with a lot of fibrosis, dermal contractures and skin induration. The characteristic features of HS are double comedones (blackheads with multiple apertures communicating below the skin), sinus tracts (resulting in the reepithelization of hair follicles after their rupture following occlusion) that shelter bacteria of foreign bodies and abscesses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>The diagnosis of HS is clinical and requires no biopsy or other analysis and is based on the frame of recurrent/chronic disease, failure to heal completely with antibiotics, multifocal distribution, sinus formation, scarring and dermal contractures, presence of double comedones, multiple open comedones, nodules, papules, tenderness of lesions and purulent discharge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref5">5</xref>]. The treatment alternatives for HS include general and topical antibiotics (Tetracyclin, Clindamycin), retinoids, immunosuppressants, antiandrogens and surgery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref6">6</xref>]. In 2017, Deckers undertook a study on a sample of 84 HS patients. A total of 253 surgical procedures were performed. The recurrence rate was as high as 37.6% after a mean follow up time of 3 years while the total remission rate was 49 years. The main recurrence factor was location in anogenital area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref7">7</xref>]. On the other hand, Wolkenstein et al. studied the quality-of-life impairment in 61 HS patients. They found that the said impairment was much greater than in any other dermatological condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>The occurrence of HS in the groin and perineum is accompanied with lots of pains, social embarrassment. Compared to other skin lesions, HS impacts most negatively on the quality of life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref9">9</xref>]. The present study is a retrospective review of severe HS of female perineum and genitalia surgically treated with focus on the outcomes and impact on the quality of postoperative life.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design and Place</title><p>We carried out a cross sectional retrospective study of the charts of patients operated for HS of perineum and genitalia in Henri Mondor Teaching Hospital in Cr&#233;teil, France.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Duration</title><p>We reviewed the charts of patients on a 19-month period spanning from December 2017 to June 2019.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Sampling</title><p>We consecutively recruited all the files of patients meeting our inclusion criteria: patients operated for severe HS of perineum and genitalia.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Collection</title><p>We retrieved files from the electronic database of the Plastic Surgery Theater of Henri Mondor Teaching Hospital information regarding epidemiologic characteristics of the patients (Age, sex, weight, body mass index), clinical features of the disease (location, history of pain, discharge, previous surgery, treatments received, Hurley stage), type of surgery done (Incision and drainage, localized or total excision), subsequent repairs and complications if any.</p><p>The patient satisfaction was assessed thanks to the Surgical Satisfaction questionnaire (SSQ) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref10">10</xref>] adapted to our work by additional questions. We contacted the patients by email to administer the questionnaire. The latter was made of 8 questions to be responded with one of the following options: totally satisfied-partially satisfied-neutral, a bit satisfied, not satisfied at all. Furthermore, we assessed the impact of the surgery on sex life thanks to a specific questionnaire and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref11">11</xref>] that evaluates 6 domains of sexual response: Desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain. The FSFI is available for download on the website https://drdanasawan.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/FSFI_questionnaire.pdf.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Ethics</title><p>Patients had to sign and return electronically an informed consent sheet prior to filling our questionnaire. The aim of the study and our expectations were explained to them on phone call. We had the authorization of the institutional Board of the Henri Mondor Hospital.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Data Processing</title><p>Data were analyzed thanks to SPSS 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). We used percentage, means and standard deviation to describe the characteristics of the sample. In order to compare categorial variables, we used Chi square and Fisher tests. To compare means, we used the independent t test, assuming a normal distribution of the sample. If not, Welch’s t test was used as alternative. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p value &lt; 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. General Characteristics of Study Population</title><p>Between December 29<sup>th</sup> 2017 and June 11<sup>th</sup> 2019, 61 patients were operated for HS in Dermatology and Plastic Surgery Unit of Henri Mondor Hospital by second author (BH) but 6 were rejected because the location of lesion was not perineum and genitalia. We then retained the 55 files that met our inclusion criteria.</p><p>All the patients were women. The mean age at operation was 29.78 years (SD 10.8) ranging from 16 to 63 years while at onset of disease it was 23.82 (SD 9.4) ranging from 11 to 53. As far as past medical history is concerned, 6 patients had pilonidal sinus, 4 a family history of HS and 4 acne vulgaris. The other characteristics of the patients are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Surgery Overview</title><p>The lesion sites were groin (N = 27, 49%), vulva (N = 19, 34.5%), Mons pubis (N = 16, 29.1%) and buttock (N = 8, 14.8%). As far as the type of surgery is concerned, 28 patients (50.9%) underwent localized excision while 25 (45.5%) had wide excision and 2 (3.6%) had incision and drainage. Regarding the closure method, 33 patients (60%) had healing via secondary intention while 22 patients (40%) had direct closure. One patient had a concomitant releasing colostomy performed.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of the sample</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SD</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-At surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-At onset</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Visual scale 0 to 10 evaluation of pain and discharge prior to surgery</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Hurley score</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >II</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >52.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >III</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >41.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Weight</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Overweight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Obesity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >18.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tobacco use</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >53.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Past medical history</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Family HS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Acnea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Ankylosing Spondylitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Pilonidal sinus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Previous surgical treatment</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Incision-drainage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >45.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Localized Excision</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >30.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-Wide Excision</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >21.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Post-Surgical Complications</title><p>The leading complication was recurrence of HS in 26 patients (47.27%). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> summarizes the complications encountered. The factors significantly associated with recurrence were overweight (p = 0.0046), location in groin (p = 0.0040), localized excision (p = 0.02), total excision (p = 0.009), healing via secondary intention (p = 0.001) and disability due to HS (p = 0.006). More details on the determinants of HS recurrence are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Assessment of Sexual and Surgical Satisfaction</title><p>Thirty patients filled and returned the questionnaire. Eighty-three per cent said to be partially or completely satisfied and would recommend it to other HS patients. This same subgroup said was ready to undergo revision surgery in case of failure or recurrence. 86% of the sample believed surgery was the best management option for HS treatment. More details on surgical satisfaction are in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Assessment of Sexual Satisfaction</title><p>We used the FSFI to assess sexual satisfaction after surgery. For all the domains studied, we calculated the composite index (CI) which is the sum of all the scores recorded in each single domain. We obtained a CI of 18.51 below the figure of 26.55 set as the threshold for diagnosis of sexual disorders. See details on <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Complications of HS surgery</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dehiscence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lymphedema</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hematoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Retraction/reduced mobility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Need for physiotherapy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Revision surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Need for re-hospitalisation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HS recurrence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recurrence on same site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recurrence in other site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Factors associated with HS recurrence</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >HS recurrence</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Odds Ratio (CI 95%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Hurley prior to surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (33.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (66.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.732</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (38.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (61.1%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (50.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (50.0%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Hurley at surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (66.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (33.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.595</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (44.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (55.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (56.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (43.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overweight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (41.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (58.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.53 (1.2 - 35.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obesity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (60.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (40.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58 (0.2 - 11.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.637</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Location: Mons pubis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (31.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (68.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.23 (0.9 - 11. 2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.059</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Location: groin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (36.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (64.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.20 (1.0 - 9.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.040<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Location: vulva</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (50.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (50.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06 (0.3 - 3.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.922</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Location: buttock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (62.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (37.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60 (0.1 - 2.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.705</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Localized excision</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (33.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (66.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26 (0.1 - 0.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.020<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wide excision</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (68.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (32.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.49 (1.4 - 14.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Healing via secondary intention</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (68.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (31.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.35 (2.5 - 35.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Healing via secondary intention + wound dressing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (68.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (31.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.35 (2.5 - 35.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Direct closure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (36.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (63.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41 (0.1 - 1.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.119</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Disability caused by HS (medical leave, joblessness)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (11.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (88.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.27 (1.7 - 138.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tobacco use</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (50.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (50.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 (0.3 - 3.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;0.999</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Assessment of surgical satisfaction</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Question: n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Totally satisfied</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Satisfied</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Neutral</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Partially satisfied</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Not satisfied</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1) Are you satisfied with pain management?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (56.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (13.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2) Are you satisfied with wound management?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (13.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3) Are you satisfied with management of offensive odours?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (13.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (13.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4) If recurrence, would you undergo revision surgery?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (66.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (16.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (3.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5) Are you satisfied with your medical leave?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (73.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (3.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6) Are you satisfied with the results of the surgery?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (66.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (16.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7) After this surgery, do you think it was the best treatment for you and would you undergo revision surgery in case of recurrence?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (80)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (3.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (3.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8) Would you advise another HS patient to be operated?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (73.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (3.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.6)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Results for the assessment of sexual satisfaction with SFSI</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Domain</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Desire</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Arousal</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lubrication</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Orgasm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Satisfaction</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pain</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Score</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.58</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>We carried out a retrospective review of the files of 55 women operated for severe perineal or genital HS in Henri Mondor Teaching Hospital in Cr&#233;teil between December 2017 and June 2019. The mean age at surgery was 29.78 years. 96.4% of the patients had localized or wide surgical excision and 3.6% an incision and drainage. We recorded a 49.1% rate of recurrence associated with overweight, location on groin, localized excision, total excision, healing via secondary intention and disability due to HS. 83% of the patients were satisfied with the surgery and would recommend it or accept revision surgery while the post-surgery composite index for sexual satisfaction was 18.51 meaning no pathologic sexual disorder.</p><p>The etiology of HS is still controversial. But the understanding of the disease has changed over time. After an initial theory by Verneuil that incriminated sweat glands for over a century, Brunstig suggested that apocrine glands be blamed for it [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref1">1</xref>]. Many etiopathogenic factors have since been reported: genetic (one form has autosomal dominant transmission), endocrinologic (high androgen levels), environmental (shaving, friction), bacterial, pharmacological (lithium), obesity and smoking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>This disease usually starts in the second or third decade and is rare after menopause. Its prevalence ranges from 0.00033 in clinical data to 4.1% in pathological reports [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref14">14</xref>]. It occurs predominantly in women with a sex ratio ranging from 2 to 5 women for a man that is yet to be explained [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref14">14</xref>]. It has no racial predilection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref17">17</xref>] though some authors in limited studies have reported African Americans and Caribbeans to be more prone to develop HS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p>The diagnosis of HS is clinical. Its differential diagnosis is done with some conditions including but not limited to Chron’s disease, granuloma inguinale, cellulitis, anal fistula, lymphadenopathy and tuberculous abscess [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref20">20</xref>].</p><p>Hurley was the first to propose a staging system for HS that was surgery-oriented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref21">21</xref>]. Later on, Sartorius proposed another classification, more suited for clinical trials and their outcomes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref22">22</xref>]. More recent staging systems have been proposed but are not yet widespread. They include Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and Hidradenitis suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>As the disease worsens over stages, it not only destroys patients tissues but also take away their quality of life especially because of pain, discomfort, offensive odors, multiple or long medical leaves, fear of social interactions, low self-esteem, stigmatization and work disability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref25">25</xref>].</p><p>The treatment of earlier stages HS is behavioral and medical and include education of patients to encourage self-watch and management, wearing of loose clothes to avoid friction in intertriginous folds, weight loss, tobacco cessation and cleanliness to reduce odor, topical treatment, intralesional corticosteroids and antibiotics (Doxycycline, tetracycline or Clindamycin) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref13">13</xref>]. In past years, radiotherapy was used in earlier stages with some success [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref1">1</xref>]. Severe disease requires more aggressive treatments like Carbon dioxide or YAG evaporation of diseased tissues and radical surgery. In 2015, an expert panel issued European Guidelines for the treatment of HS/acnea inversa recommending that HS be treated based on its subjective impact and its objective severity using surgery to cure locally recurrent lesions while medical therapy (including antibiotics and immunosuppressants) in combination with surgery be used for wide spread lesions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>Recurrence is a well-known feature of HS. Our recurrence rate on same site is (23.6%). Ulrich et al. found a recurrence rate of 12.5% in a German series of 84 patients, significantly higher in heavy smokers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref26">26</xref>]. Deckers et al. reported 37.6% recurrence rate after a 3-year long follow-up in a series of 84 patients who underwent 253 procedures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref7">7</xref>]. Other authors report lower recurrence rates. The difference lies in the heterogeneity of the samples since the initial severity, patients’ comorbidities, location of the disease, extent of the involvement and surgical techniques are important determinants of recurrence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref12">12</xref>]. In fact, Mehdizadeh et al. in a meta-analysis and review reported that wide excision is the best surgical technique whenever possible as it lowers the recurrence rate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref27">27</xref>]. However, there is no consensus on the preferred surgical technique and it is not always possible to perform a wide excision in some locations like groins, buttocks perineum and genitalia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>We registered a post-surgical satisfaction rate of 83%. Those patients said would recommend surgery to others or undertake revision surgery in case of failure or recurrence. The retrospective nature of the study did not permit to get the preoperative assessment of the quality of life. However the postoperative survey revealed an overall improvement of the quality of life through abovementioned high satisfaction rates. Kouris et al. in a study compared 94 HS patients with 94 controls and found that the cases had statistically significantly higher anxiety, depression, loneliness and social isolation scores than their control counterparts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref23">23</xref>]. In the same vein, Alavi et al. found that patients with high odor had a greater quality of life impairment and concluded that malodor was a symptom of HS that significantly impairs the QoL of affected persons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref28">28</xref>]. In this study sample, only 13.2% of patients were not satisfied.</p><p>Regarding sexual life, all the compartments of sex response were adversely affected by HS, but there was a general postoperatively satisfaction since the composite index for SFSI was within normal range. This is comprehensible since our sample included only severe cases that already faced the worst symptoms of HS (purulent discharge, malodor, disability). Janse et al. surveyed 300 patients of HS on their sexual health and QoL and reported a diminished QoL and sexual health in this population according to FSFI, ASEX and IIEF scores [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.113000-ref24">24</xref>]. Furthermore, sexual life was associated with QoL in women but not in men and female gender and late onset was associated with poorer sexual function.</p><p>The limitation of this study is its retrospective design that did not allow us to properly assess preoperative sexual and life quality. That information was not systematically recorded at that time.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>We retrospectively reviewed the files of 55 women with severe HS operated between December 2017 and June 2019. Localized and wide excisions yielded good cosmetic and functional results illustrated by high satisfaction rates on assessment of post-surgical and sexual quality of life. Recurrence rate was high since total excision is difficult to perform in groin and ano-genital areas.</p><p>Chronicity and recurrence make HS a psychologically hard-to-live condition. Therefore, management should be holistic and multidisciplinary involving dermatologists, psychologists, gynecologists, sexologists, and any other specialist when necessary. More studies need to be carried out with larger samples to better understand its etiology and characterize the patient population.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Author Contributions</title><p>DS, CT and BH designed the study. DS recruited the subjects, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. CT, BH and JPM corrected the manuscript. DS, CT, BH and JPM all accepted the final version.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>To all the patients who accepted to return our questionnaire, without whom this study wouldn’t have been done.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Funding Information</title><p>We received no funding or grant for this study.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sawan, D., Touboul, C., Hersant, B. and Meningaud, J.P. (2021) Surgical Management of Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Women: Outcome and Quality of Life Assessment. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11, 1425-1436. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2021.1111132</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>List of Abbreviations</title><p>ASEX: Arizona Sexual Experience scale</p><p>FSFI: Female Sexual Function Index</p><p>HiSCR: Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response</p><p>HS: Hidradenitis suppurativa</p><p>IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function</p><p>PGA: Physician Global Assessment</p><p>QoL: Quality of life</p><p>SSQ: Surgical satisfaction questionnaire</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.113000-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alikhan, A., Lynch, P.J. and Eisen, D.B. (2009) Hidradenitis suppurativa: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 60, 539-561. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.11.911</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Revuz, J. (2009) Hidradenitis suppurativa. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 23, 985-998. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03356.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gulliver, W., Zouboulis, C.C., Prens, E., Jemec, G.B. and Tzellos, T. (2016) Evidence-Based Approach to the Treatment of Hidradenitis suppurativa /Acne Inversa, Based on the European Guidelines for Hidradenitis suppurativa. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 17, 343-351.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-016-9328-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Slade, D.E.M., Powell, B.W. and Mortimer, P.S. (2003) Hidradenitis suppurativa: Pathogenesis and Management. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &amp; Aesthetic Surgery, 56, 451-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(03)00177-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jemec, G.B.E. (2012) Hidradenitis suppurativa. The New England Journal of Medicine, 366, 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1014163</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saunte, D.M.L. and Jemec, G.B.E. (2017) Hidradenitis suppurativa: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA, 318, 2019-2032. 
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.16691</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deckers, I.E., Dahi, Y., Van der Zee, H.H. and Prens, E.P. (2018) Hidradenitis suppurativa Treated with Wide Excision and Second Intention Healing: A Meaningful Local Cure Rate after 253 Procedures. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 32, 459-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14770</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wolkenstein, P., Loundou, A., Barrau, K., Auquier, P., Revuz, J. and Dermatology, Q. (2007) Quality of life Impairment in Hidradenitis suppurativa: A Study of 61 Cases. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 56, 621-623. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2006.08.061</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Revuz, J.E., Canoui-Poitrine, F., Wolkenstein, P., Viallette, C., Gabison, G., Pouget, F., Poli, F., Faye, O., Roujeau, J.C. and Bonnelye, G. (2008) Prevalence and Factors Associated with Hidradenitis suppurativa: Results from Two Case-Control Studies. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 59, 596-601. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2008.06.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baker, R. (1991) The Reliability and Criterion Validity of a Measure of Patients’ Satisfaction with Their General Practice. Family Practice, 8, 171-177. 
https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/8.2.171</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rosen, R. (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A Multidimensional Self-Report Instrument for the Assessment of Female Sexual Function. Journal of Sex &amp; Marital Therapy, 26, 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278597</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mehdizadeh, A., Hazen, P.G., Bechara, F.G., Zwingerman, N., Moazenzadeh, M., Bashash, M., Sibbald, R.G. and Alavi, A. (2015) Recurrence of Hidradenitis suppurativa after Surgical Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 73, S70-S77. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.07.044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alavi, A., Farzanfar, D., Lee, R.K. and Almutairi, D. (2018) The Contribution of Malodour in Quality of Life of Patients with Hidradenitis suppurativa. Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, 22, 166-174. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/1203475417745826</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ulrich, A., Hildebrandt, U. and Ulrich, J. (2014) Acne Inversa: Influence of Associated Factors in the Extent of the Disease and the Result of Surgery. Der Hautarzt, 65, Article No. 623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-014-2839-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alavi, A., Anooshirvani, N., Kim, W.B., Coutts, P. and Sibbald, R.G. (2015) Quality-of-Life Impairment in Patients with Hidradenitis suppurativa: A Canadian Study. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 16, 61-65. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-014-0105-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Janse, I.C., Deckers, I.E., van der Maten, A.D., Evers, A.W.M., Boer, J., van der Zee, H.H., Prens, E.P. and Horváth, B. (2017) Sexual Health and Quality of Life Are Impaired in Hidradenitis suppurativa: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study. British Journal of Dermatology, 176, 1042-1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14975</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouris, A., Platsidaki, E., Christodoulou, C., Efstathiou, V., Dessinioti, C., Tzanetakou, V., Korkoliakou, P., Zisimou, C., Antoniou, C. and Kontochristopoulos, G. (2016) Quality of Life and Psychosocial Implications in Patients with Hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatology, 232, 687-691. https://doi.org/10.1159/000453355</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sartorius, K., Lapins, J., Emtestam, L. and Jemec, G.B.E. (2003) Suggestions for Uniform Outcome Variables When Reporting Treatment Effects in Hidradenitis suppurativa. British Journal of Dermatology, 149, 211-213. 
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05390.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hurley, H. (1989) Dermatologic Surgery, Principles and Practice, Marcel Dekker ed., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wiseman, M.C. (2004) Hidradenitis suppurativa: A Review. Dermatologic Therapy, 17, 50-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04007.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paletta, F.X. (1963) Hidradenitis suppurativa: Pathologic Study and Use of Skin Flaps. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 31, 307-315. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196304000-00001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, S.C.W., Kazzazi, N. and Lord, P.H. (1986) Surgical Treatment of Perineal Hidradenitis suppurativa with Special Reference to Recognition of the Perianal Form. British Journal of Surgery, 73, 978-980.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800731210</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chaikin, D.C., Volz, L.R. and Broderick, G. (1994) An Unusual Presentation of Hidradenitis suppurativa: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Urology, 44, 606-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(94)80072-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Williams, S.T., Busby, R.C., DeMuth, R.J. and Nelson, H. (1991) Perineal Hidradenitis suppurativa: Presentation of Two Unusual Complications and a Review. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 26, 456-462.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199105000-00008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fitzsimmons, J.S. and Guilbert, P.R. (1985) A Family Study of Hidradenitis suppurativa. Journal of Medical Genetics, 22, 367-373.  
https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.22.5.367</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jemec, G.B., Heidenheim, M. and Nielsen, N.H. (1996) The Prevalence of Hidradenitis suppurativa and Its Potential Precursor Lesions. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 35, 191-194.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(96)90321-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zouboulis, C.C., Bechara, F.G., Fritz, K., Kurzen, H., Liakou, A.I., Marsch, W.C., Milling, A., Nast, A., Podda, M. and Taube, K.M. (2012) S1 Guideline for the Treatment of Hidradenitis suppurativa /Acne Inversa*(ICD-10 Ziffer: L73.2). Journal of the German Society of Dermatology, 10, S1-S31. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1610-0387.2012.08006.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.113000-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zouboulis, C.C., Desai, N., Emtestam, L., Hunger, R.E., Ioannides, D., Juhász, I., Lapins, J., Matusiak, L., Prens, E.P. and Revuz, J. (2015) European S1 Guideline for the Treatment of Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne Inversa. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 29, 619-644. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12966</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>