The liver, the crossroads of most metabolisms, is subject to attack by many xenobiotic and endogenous agents. This aggression is essentially reflected by an increase in serum aminotransferases in connection with hepatic cytolysis. Thus, the etiological diagnosis of hepatic cytolysis is not always easy due to the diversity of its causes. It is, therefore, useful to determine the cause for appropriate management. Although alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) has narrower specificity for the liver, a predominance of aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) may be observed in some situations. Although these enzymes expressed hepatocellular suffering, they do not always have a prognostic value.

On the other hand, if a value greater than 15 times the upper limit of normal (15N) indicates acute cytolysis and a value less than 10 times the upper limit of normal (10 N) suggests chronic cytolysis, and among the two there is a gray area difficult to classify [1]. Another source of hepatic cytolysis must also be eliminated. In the United States, the prevalence of hepatic cytolysis has been reported at 7.9%, of which 31% are closely linked to excessive alcohol consumption, or to viral hepatitis or iron overload and 69% are associated with a metabolic syndrome [2]. In two (2) French studies in blood donors, hepatic cytolysis was reported to be 0.5% and 5% respectively [3] [4]. In Mali, we did not find any studies on hepatic cytolysis, hence this study on their etiologies.

This was a cross-sectional study that took place from April 2, 2019 to March 31, 2020 in the hepato-gastroenterology department of the Gabriel Touré university hospital. Our inclusion criteria were:

- Patients with an increase in alanine aminotransferase alone beyond the upper normal limit;

- Patients with an increase in alanine aminotransferase beyond the upper normal limit associated with an increase in aspartate aminotransferase.

We excluded cases of cytolysis involving only aspartate aminotransferases.

All patients benefited from:

➢ An interrogation which made it possible to research

- Socio-demographic data: age, sex, ethnicity, profession, residence;

- History: Alcoholism, blood transfusion, notion of taking hepatotoxic drugs, smoking, notion of liver disease, tattooing and scarification, or other pathologies;

- Signs of the disease: asthenia, anorexia, myalgia, arthralgia, abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding.

➢ A complete physical examination that looked for signs of liver disease

- Jaundice with or without pruritus;

- Asterixis;

- Fetor hepaticus;

- Stellar Angioma;

- Purpura, petechiae;

- Palmar erythrosis;

- Splenomegaly;

- Hepatomegaly;

- Abdominal collateral venous circulation (CVC);

- Ascites;

- Dark urine;

- Discolored stools;

- Scratching lesions.

➢ Para-clinical examinations included

o Biological examinations: Determination of aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatases, Gamma glutamyl transferase, total and conjugated bilirubinemia, ferritinemia, prothrombin level, serological markers of viral hepatitis A, B, C, D, E: Anti-hepatitis virus antibodies A; HBs antigen, anti HBc antibody, anti hepatitis C virus antibody, anti hepatitis D virus antibody, anti hepatitis E virus antibody, alpha foeto-protein, anti mitochondria type 2 antibody, anti smooth muscle antibody, anti LKM1 antibody.

o Morphological examinations

- Abdominal ultrasound or abdominal computed tomography (CT) to assess the morphology of the liver, gall bladder and portal system;

- Chest X-ray to check for cardiomegaly or pneumonia;

- Electrocardiogram (ECG) to look for signs of right or global heart failure;

- Eso-gastro-duodenal fibroscopy looking for esophageal and/or cardiotuberosity varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy, ulcer, erosions, and antral vascular ectasia;

- Fine needle puncture for cytological study of the liver.

The information on the variables were obtained through individual survey forms and recorded on EPI Info 6.0. The texts and tables were produced using Microsoft Word 2013 software. The Chi-square statistical test was used to compare the results. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

At the end of this study, 199 patients were able to meet our inclusion criteria out of 2800 consultations, either a hospital frequency of 7.1%.

The age groups of 26 - 35, 36 - 45, 46 - 55 were in the majority in the sample (18.6%, 21.6% and 18.1%). Men were the majority in the sample, 63.3% with a sex ratio of 1.73. Farmers and housewives were in the majority in 22.6% and 21.1% of the sample, respectively. Mainly asthenia and anorexia were the signs which motivated the consultation in the patients in respectively 94.9% and 83.4% (Table 1). Fever and epistaxis was the least common at 0.5%. Jaundice was the most common antecedent (24.1% of cases). However, 24% of patients had no history. Jaundice, hepatomegaly and ascites were the most common physical signs in 44.2%, 27.6% and 26.1%, respectively (Table 2). Discolored stools, collateral venous circulation and hepato-jugular reflux were the least frequent physical signs with 9%, 8% and 7.5% respectively. Aminotransferase alanine elevation > 1.5 N and <10 N was observed in 77.9%. An associated elevation of

aminotransferase aspartate was found in 152 cases (51.2%). The frequency of HBs antigen carriage was 40.2% in patients. Anemia (microcytic, hypochromic) was the most common abnormality on the blood count. An elevation of transaminases > 1.5 N and <10 N related to HBsAg and anti-HCV antibody was predominant in 77.5% and 100% of cases, respectively. Of 199 patients, 184 were able to perform an abdominal ultrasound of which 25 had a normal result and 159 had an abnormality. Homogeneous hepatomegaly alone or associated with splenomegaly was found in 52.7% of cases. Ultrasound was normal in 13.6% of patients. Of 199 patients, 47 underwent abdominal-pelvic CT scan, all of which had an abnormal result. Hepatocellulllary carcinoma and cirrhosis were common at 61.7% and 23.4%. Endoscopy was performed in 101/199 of our patients and normal in 22.8% of patients. Esophageal varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy were the most common endoscopic signs, at 26.8% and 18.8%, respectively. Viral hepatitis and complications (Hepatocellulllary carcinoma and cirrhosis) dominated the etiology of liver cytolysis (Table 3). Chronic cytolysis was significantly observed during Hepatocellulllary carcinoma andcirrhosis (p = 0.0008, 0.00003) while acute cytolysis was significantly encountered during viral, drug, bile duct obstructions and malaria (p = 0.00006, 0.00003, 0.00000001 and 0.0282) (Table 4).

Limitations: In our study, some investigations necessary for etiological diagnosis could not be carried out because of the lack of financial resources and our traditional beliefs. However, the results obtained allowed a reasonable analysis of the characteristics of hepatic cytolysis in our study center. This study reported a frequency of cytolysis of 7.1% in 2800 patients who consulted during the study period. This result is superior to those of Friedman et al., of Capron and al and of Driss et al. [3] [4] [5] who reported 0.5%, 5% and 4.8% respectively. This difference could be explained by the high frequency of viral hepatitis and its complications (cirrhosis, HCC) in our context. The mean age of the patients was 44.06 ± 16.4 years, lower than that reported by Hachicha et al. [6] which was 55 years in a study on the contribution of PBF in the etiological diagnosis of cytolysis and/or unexplained cholestasis. The sex ratio was 1.73 in our study, which was contrary to that found by Hachicha et al. [6] which was 0.44. This difference could be explained by the frequency of chronic HBV carriage in humans in our context [7]. The predominance of cytolysis in farmers and housewives were reported by our study. This could be explained by the promiscuity in these social strata which would favor the transmission of HBV. Asthenia and anorexia were the signs that prompted the consultation, thus confirming Bragança’s result [8]. The physical signs were dominated by jaundice, hepatomegaly, ascites in our study. Hachicha et al. [6] reported a predominance of hepatosplenomegaly, jaundice, pruritus and gastrointestinal bleeding. HBsAg and anti-HCV Ab were found in 40.2% and 9% of our patients, respectively. This frequency of HBV infection in our context is reported by a previous study which found at least one serum marker of HBV in 60.2% of patients with HCC [9]. A study recent report has reported the prevalence of HBs Antigen to be 14.7% of the general population [7]. A recent study reported the prevalence of the HBs Antigen to 14.7% of the general population [7]. In the work Debonne et al. [10], after steatosis (52%), chronic hepatitis with or without cirrhosis viral predominance B is the second largest diagnostic framework (33% of cases). This is confirmed by our study which found an elevation of transaminases > 1.5 N and <10 N linked to HBV and HCV in 77.5% and 100% of cases, respectively. An aspect of chronic cytolysis was more frequent. The incidence of chronic cytolysis varied between 3% and 12% in the general population [11] [12] and 1 to 6 cases per year per million inhabitants in developed countries [13] [14] [15] [16] for the acute cytolysis. Viral hepatitis B, obstruction of the bile ducts, drug-induced hepatitis and malaria were significantly associated with acute cytolysis respectively p = 6 × 10⁻⁵, 10⁻⁸, 3 × 10⁻⁵ and 0.0282. Potel et al. [17] in a study of acute hepatitis to emergencies report that viral hepatitis B remains the main infectious cause of acute liver failure. Pateron Guyader et al. found that obstruction of the bile ducts were the second cause of acute cytolysis [1] [18]. Drug-induced hepatitis are the main causes of acute cytolytic the United States and Western Europe [17]. Cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma were significantly associated with chronic cytolysis p = 3 × 10⁻⁵ and 8 × 10⁻⁴. This result confirms that of Diallo [6] and Ouavene et al. [19] who found chronic cytolysis in 52% and 68% of cirrhotic patients, respectively. Otherwise, Aoudad found 10% of chronic cytolysis associated with hepatocellular carcinoma [20]. The greater representativeness of hepatocellular carcinoma in our study could be explained by delayed diagnosis of this condition [21], for which infection by HBV remains the main cause in our context [9].

Hepatic cytolysis has been little studied in Africa and particularly in Mali. This study was carried out with a view to providing information on this biological anomaly. The prevalence of cytolysis was 7.1% in our patients. The main reasons for consultation were physical asthenia and anorexia. Jaundice, hepatomegaly and ascites were the physical signs commonly found in patients. The main causes of acute cytolysis were viral hepatitis B, bile duct obstructions, drug-induced hepatitis and malaria, while chronic cytolysis was mainly tied to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Coulibaly, H.S.w., Samaké, K.D.w., Dicko, M.Y., Sidibé, D.S.w., Tounkara, M.S., Diarra, O., Konaté, A., Diarra, M.T. and Maiga, M.Y. (2021) Etiologies of Liver Cytolysis in the Service of Hepato-Gastroenterology of the Gabriel Toure University Hospital. Open Journal of Gastroenterology, 11, 211-219. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojgas.2021.1111022