<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Biosciences and Medicines</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5081</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbm.2021.910016</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBM-112863</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Genetic Characteristics of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; Isolates from Cultivated Citrus in China Based on Coat Protein Gene
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yiqun</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiaoshang</surname><given-names>You</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bo</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Long</surname><given-names>Yi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>College of Life Sciences, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>190</fpage><lpage>200</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2021</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2021</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2021</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   <em>Citrus tristeza virus</em> (CTV) is an important citrus pathogen causing considerable economic loss to citrus production. Knowledge on genetic evolutionary of the CTV population in China remains limited. In this study, 1439 samples were collected from nine citrus-producing areas of China. The coat protein (CP) genes of CTV were amplified by RT-PCR, and sequenced to analyze the genetic evolution. Analysis of the base composition showed an AU preference pattern, with the GC content was lower than AU content. Nine CTV populations were clustered into one clade in neighbor-joining (NJ) tree, indicative of a close phylogenetic relationship among the populations in China. Analysis of molecular variation (AMOVA) revealed that 77.72% genetic variations of CTV populations were observed among populations, with an 
   <em>F </em>
   <sub>ST</sub> value of 0.223. The values of 
   <em>d<sub>N</sub>/d<sub>S</sub></em> and neutrality test of 
   <em>CP</em> gene were ranged from 0.016 to 0.082 and ?1.377 to 1.456, respectively, the results suggesting that all of nine CTV populations were relatively constantly maintained under purifying selection. Our study demonstrated the genetic characteristics and molecular evolution relationship of CTV populations in China, and provided a theoretical basis for scientific control of CTV. 
   
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Cultivated Citrus</kwd><kwd> Coat Protein Gene</kwd><kwd> Genetic Evolution</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>As one of the most important fruit crops in the world, citrus is widely cultivated in China. According to statistics, as early as 2008, citrus planting area and output in China were ranked first in the world. But for a long time, plant pathogens such as Citrus tristeza virus (CTV), Huanglongbing (HLB), Citrus tatter leaf virus (CTLV) have posed a huge impact on the healthy development of citrus industry in China. CTV, a member of the genus Closterovirus in the family Closteroviridae, has been widely occurred in citrus-producing areas of China [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref2">2</xref>]. Twenty-five years ago, Pappu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref3">3</xref>] had reported the complete genome sequence of a mild strain of T30. Subsequent studies showed that certain nucleotide differences existed among different CTV isolates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref4">4</xref>]. Whole genome sequencing of different CTV isolates indicated that CTV genome contained a single-stranded positive-sense RNA (+ssRNA) of around 19226~19296 nt in length, which was the largest genome among the known plant viruses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref5">5</xref>]. CTV genome consists of 12 open reading frames (ORF), the CP gene and CPm gene together code for the coat protein, in which the CP gene encodes a 25 KDa main coat protein, and the CPm gene encodes a 27 KDa subcoat protein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref6">6</xref>]. The coat protein of virus is often used as a key gene for molecular detection of plant viruses because of its highly conservative [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref7">7</xref>]. Noticeably, the full-length or partial core sequence of the CP gene has been widely used to analyze the genetic diversity and molecular sequence characteristics of plant viruses, such as Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), Lettuce mosaic virus (LMV), Ornithogalum mosaic virus (OrMV), etc .[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>Due to the transportation of virus-carrying seedlings and the transmission of aphids, CTV has widely occurred in major citrus-producing areas in China. The complexity and diversity of hosts and habitats, as well as the mixed infection of viruses have further caused the occurrence of viral genome recombination mutations. In addition, mutation and recombination are common evolutionary factors in genetic diversity and variation in populations of plant RNA viruses, and are known as the preliminary source of variation in populations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref10">10</xref>]. Previous studies on CTV from cultivated citrus mostly focused on organization structure, molecular evolution, and CTV-host interactions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref13">13</xref>], but there is few system information on the occurrence, distribution, and genetic evolution of the CTV populations in China. Hence, in this study, larger samples of CTV isolates from nine major citrus-production areas in China were collected. The CP gene sequence of each sample was used to analyze the nucleotide composition, genetic evolution, as well as the molecular variation. This study will provide a theoretical basis for scientific prevention and control of CTV in citrus production.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sample Collection</title><p>In 2018-2019, a total of 1439 fresh citrus leaf samples with no obvious symptoms were collected from commercial orchards in the main citrus-producing areas of nine provinces in China (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Two leaves at each of four directions of citrus trees (planted more than ten years old) were collected as one sample referring to</p><p>the methods of Garnsey et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref14">14</xref>], 1439 citrus samples were tested with direct tissue blot immunoassay (DTBIA) to identify positive CTV samples.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Methods</title><p>Total RNAs were extracted from CTV-positive samples using TRIzol reagent (TaKaRa, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First strand cDNA was synthesized by M-MLV reverse transcriptase (TaKaRa, Beijing, China). The primers CP1: (5'-ATGGACGACGAAACAAAG-3') and CP3: (5'-TCAACGTGTGTTGAATTT-3') were used for the amplification of CP (672 bp) gene of CTV isolates as described previously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref15">15</xref>]. The amplicons for each gene were purified and sequenced from both directions at Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). After analyzed using Contig Express software, each sequence was compared to the calibrated sequence of corresponding gene fragments of a known CTV isolates in GenBank.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Sequence Analysis</title><p>Base composition, non synonymous mutation (d<sub>N</sub>) and synonymous mutation (d<sub>S</sub>) were calculated by MEGA X software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref16">16</xref>]. In order to determine the geographical relationship between CTV populations, neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA X software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref16">16</xref>] with Nei’s genetic distances. CP gene fragments of CTV isolates VT (U56902) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref17">17</xref>], T3 (KC525952), T30 (AY260651) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref18">18</xref>], T36 (U16304) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref5">5</xref>], NZRB-TH30 (FJ525434) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref19">19</xref>], NuagA (AB046398) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref20">20</xref>], Kpg3 (HM573451) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref21">21</xref>], HA16-5 (GQ454870) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref22">22</xref>], SY568 (AF001623) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref23">23</xref>], and B165 (EU076703) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref24">24</xref>], and one isolate of Beet yellow virus (BYV: NC_001598) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref25">25</xref>] from GenBank were included for analysis, in which the BYV isolate was used as out-group. Nucleotide diversity (Pi), haplotype diversity index (Hd), Fu and Li's D, Fu and Li's F, Tajima's D and nucleotide mismatch distribution were calculated using DNA SP V5 software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref26">26</xref>]. The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was calculated by Arleqin version 3.0 software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref27">27</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. CTV Infection in Different Citrus Producing Areas</title><p>A total of 1439 citrus samples from nine locations were tested by DTBIA, 802 of which were CTV-positive. The overall infection rate was 55.73%, and the infection rate in each citrus-producing area was ranged from 33.33% to 100%. To be clear, the infection of CTV in Zhejiang was the lowest, while all the samples collected in Hubei and Guangdong Provinces were detected to be CTV-positive, with an infection ratio of 100% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The results showed that CTV was widely spread and presented a severe threat to citrus production in China.</p><p>Thirty CTV isolates were randomly selected from nine major citrus-producing areas for sequencing and sequence analysis, and a total of 270 CTV sequences were obtained. The selected sequences were all 672 bp in length and deposited in GenBank as HB (Hubei, 1-30, accession numbers: OK082161-OK082190), FJ (Fujian, 1-30, accession numbers: OK082191-OK082220), GD (Guangdong, 1-30, accession numbers: OK082221-OK082250), HN (Hunan, 1-30, accession numbers: OK082251-OK082280), CQ (Chongqing, 1-30, accession numbers: OK082281- OK082310), SC (Sichuan, 1-30, accession numbers: OK082311-OK082340), GX (Guangxi, 1-30, accession numbers: OK082341-OK082370), ZJ (Zhejiang, 1-30, accession numbers: OK082371-OK082400), and JX (Jiangxi, 1-30, accession numbers: OK082401-OK082430).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Base Composition Analysis</title><p>Multiple comparisons of the CP sequences derived from nine CTV populations identified 450 conserved sites, 222 variable sites, 179 parsimony information sites and 43 singleton sites. The average GC content of amplified CP sequences was 44.32%, which was much lower than AU content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), showing the</p><p>characteristics of AU preference. The GC content varied among the selected populations, ranging from 43.33% content in ZJ population to 44.73% in CQ population, but no statistical significance was found. The ratio R of transformation to transversion of nine CTV populations was 5.217 - 11.131, with an average of 6.611.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis</title><p>The NJ phylogenetic tree constructed using the CP sequences showed that the nine CTV populations and other 10 reported CTV isolates were randomly clustered regardless of geographic origins (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). However, the nine CTV populations were divergent from CTV isolates derived from T30, kpg3, and HA16-5, suggested that these three CTV isolates did not prevalently occur in China. In addition, populations from different geographic origins were clustered together, indicating that the genetic relationship among the CTV populations was relatively close, and the geographical correlation with foreign isolates is poor.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Analysis of Molecular Variation</title><p>Based on AMOVA, only 22.28% of the total variations were from among populations, while 77.72% were from within populations for CP gene (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The variance components among populations were 3.84, and the variance components within populations accounted for 13.396. The value of F<sub>ST</sub> of 270 CTV isolates total population were 0.223 (P = 0.000), suggesting a low level of geographical population differentiation in CTV population for CP gene (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Genetic Diversity Analysis</title><p>The total nucleotide diversity index (Pi) and Haplotype diversity index (Hd) within sequences of CP gene for total CTV population were 0.050 and 0.999, respectively. The Pi of CP gene was ranged from 0.027 to 0.057, with no obvious difference among those CTV populations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Among them, the genetic diversity of HN CTV population is the most abundant, while that of GD population is low.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Natural Selection Pressures</title><p>The analysis on the selection pressure of CTV population showed that, the calculated values of non-synonymous mutation (d<sub>N</sub>) of nine CTV populations were lower than the calculated values of synonymous mutation (d<sub>S</sub>), and the ratios of d<sub>N</sub>/d<sub>S</sub> of nine CTV populations ranged from 0.016 to 0.082 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). There was no evidence for positive selection among nine CTV populations, as the ratios of d<sub>N</sub>/d<sub>S</sub> between sequences were less than 1, indicating the negative selection. Among the nine CTV populations, the lowest ratios of d<sub>N</sub>/d<sub>S</sub> of 0.016 were observed in GD CTV population, while highest ratios of 0.082 were found in ZJ populations.</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Demographic History</title><p>In total nine CTV populations, the values of Fu and Li’s D, Fu and Li’s F, and</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> AMOVA analysis among CTV populations based on CP gene</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Source of variation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >d.f.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sum of squares</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variance components</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage of variation (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fixation index</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Among populations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1028.656</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.840</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >F<sub>ST</sub> = 0.223 P = 0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Within populations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >261</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3496.300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.396</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total variances</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >269</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4524.956</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.23532</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Genetic diversity, neutral test and selection pressure analysis of CTV populations based on CP gene</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Population</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nucleotide diversity (Pi)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Haplotype diversity (Hd)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fu and Li’s D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fu and Li’s F</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tajima’s D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >d<sub>N</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >d<sub>S</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >d<sub>N</sub>/ d<sub>S</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JX</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.054 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.998</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.145 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.061 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.134 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.223 &#177; 0.026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.060</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.057 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.956</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.797 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.962 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.846 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.259 &#177; 0.032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.042 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.102 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.182 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.257 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.173 &#177; 0.021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.058</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FJ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.045 &#177; 0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.925 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.949 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.559 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.191 &#177; 0.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.063</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZJ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.029 &#177; 0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.993</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.155 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.377 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.182 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.110 &#177; 0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.082</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.998</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.102 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.260 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.994 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.127 &#177; 0.021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GX</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.033 &#177; 0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.993</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.162 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.477 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.882 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.132 &#177; 0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.061</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.037 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.993</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.456 (P&lt;0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.418 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.683 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.161 &#177; 0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.037</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CQ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.036 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.796 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.840 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.537 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.146 &#177; 0.021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.062</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.050 &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.112 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.003 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.587 (P &gt; 0.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.216 &#177; 0.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.051</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Tajima’s D index of neutrality test were ranged from −1.377 to 1.456, with no statistical difference (P &gt; 0.05). In addition, among three tested method with CTV isolates of HN, GD, and SC CTV population, and Fu and Li’s D and F test values for JX CTV population were negative, but none of them were significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>In order to further determine the dynamic history of CTV population, the mismatch distribution of CTV population was analyzed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The results showed that nine geographical populations and the whole CTV population were multimodally distributed. This may suggest that CTV populations do not experience population expansion events, and the population size tends to be stable.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>In this study, a total of 1439 samples were collected from nine commercial citrus orchards covering all major citrus pockets in China. After detection by DTBIA, 802 samples were identified as CTV-positive. The overall incidence rate of CTV was 55.73% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), which suggested that the CTV was commonly occurred in China, probably transmitted by the frequent transportation of virus-carrying seedlings. The base composition analysis indicated that the GC content of 270 nucleic acid sequences of CP gene was between 43.33% and 44.73%. The AU preference characteristics may promote adaptation of CTV in citrus host, and play important role in host?virus interaction and pathogenicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref28">28</xref>].</p><p>The complete genome sequencing has given us a new perspective to understand the occurrence and characterization of CTV, but there are only limited numbers of whole genome sequences available from certain regions. Therefore, comparisons and phylogenetic analyses of easily obtained and widely available CP gene sequences have widely been used for molecular characterization, as well as typing of CTV isolate from different geographical origins, various host, and biological properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref30">30</xref>]. The phylogenetic analysis revealed that nine CTV populations clustered together with seven foreign isolates (VT, T3, 30, T36, NZRB-TH30, NuagA, SY568 and B165) in a sub-group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), showing a poor correlation between genetic divergence and geographic origin. Similar results were obtained with AMOVA, representing by 77.72% variations were observed from within populations and the F<sub>ST</sub> (0.223) were lower than 0.25 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref31">31</xref>]</p><p>(<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). This phenomenon might be caused by four reasons: 1) CTV transmitted by many kinds of aphid vectors, and the large species and quantity provided conditions for the spread of CTV in cultivated citrus to a certain extent; 2) CTV was characterized by a slow evolution at a rate of 1.58 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> nt per site per year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref32">32</xref>], along with the fact that CP gene at the 3’ end was highly conservative [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref33">33</xref>]; 3) the frequent transactions of CTV-carrying seedlings in each region provided a basis for genetic exchange among the CTV populations; 4) the geographical environmental factors might not be able to drive the genetic differentiation of CTV in China.</p><p>With the analysis of genetic diversity on the sequences of CP gene, the values for nucleotide diversity index (Pi) were ranged from 0.027 to 0.057 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Interestingly, the Pi values obtained with CP gene in this study was similar with that of CTV isolates from cultivated citrus in India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref34">34</xref>]. In context of the long distance and the geographical barrier between China and India, the genetic exchange level of those CTV populations was expected to be low. Therefore, it is more likely that the level of genetic variation remained relatively stable during a long period of evolution for these nine CTV populations.</p><p>The results of natural selection test indicated that CP gene was under purification selection in all nine CTV populations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Davino et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref35">35</xref>] analyzed that the d<sub>N</sub>/d<sub>S</sub> of Italian cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) was less than 1, which was speculated to be a regulatory ability of virus in order to adapt to the host defense mechanism. In this study, the purification selection of CTV was an advantageous mutation of the virus in order to adapt to survival, and further improved its adaptability by accumulating advantageous mutations. In addition, CTV isolates from nine populations showed at equilibrium because three neutrality test statistics (Fu &amp; Li’s D, Fu &amp; Li’s F, and Tajima’s D) were non-significant, and the mismatch distributions were multimodal (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Indeed, virus population expansion was associated with the host quantity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.112863-ref36">36</xref>]. The large citrus production in China is the possibly reasons for the CTV populations maintained relatively constant.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The genetic characteristics of nine CTV populations from China were analyzed basing on the CP genes. The CTV populations from different provinces had no significant genetic differentiation and remained relatively stable, possibly due to the relatively high level of genetic exchanges among CTV populations. These nine CTV populations were found under purification selection, which might prevent the occurrence of deleterious mutations and keep the genetic variations at low level in each CTV population. Our results could provide a theoretical reference for the genetic evolution of CTV.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Funding</title><p>This research was supported by project 31860488 from National Natural Science Foundation of China.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Chen, Y.Q., You, X.S., Chen, B. and Yi, L. (2021) Genetic Characteristics of Citrus tristeza Virus Isolates from Cultivated Citrus in China Based on Coat Protein Gene. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 9, 190-200. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2021.910016</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.112863-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, X.F., Zhou, C.Y., Song, Z. and Yang, F.Y. (2006) Preliminary Studies on CPG/Hinf I RFLP Groups of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; Infected Sweet Oranges in China. Agricultural Sciences in China, 5, 39-44.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(06)60017-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J., Zhou, T., Shen, P., Zhang, S., Cao, M., Zhou, Y., et al. (2020) Complete Genome Sequences of Two Novel Genotypes of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; Infecting Poncirus trifoliata in China. Journal of Plant Pathology, 102, 903-907.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-020-00535-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pappu, H.R., Karasev, A.V., Anderson, E.J., Pappu, S.S., Hilf, M.E., Febres, V.J., Eckloff, R.M.G., McCaffery, M., Boyko, V. and Gowda, S. (1994) Nucleotide Sequence and Organization of Eight 3’ Open Reading Frames of the Citrus Tristeza Closterovirus Genome. Virology, 199, 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1994.1095</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harper, S.J. (2013) &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt;: Evolution of Complex and Varied Genotypic Groups. Frontiers in Microbiology, 4, 93.  
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00093</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karasev, A.V., Boyko, V.P., Gowda, S., Nikolaeva, O.V., Hilf, M.E., Koonin, E.V., et al. (1995) Complete Sequence of the &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; RNA Genome. Virology, 208, 511-520. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1995.1182</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Febres, V.J., Ashoulin, L., Mawassi, M., Frank, A., Bar-Joseph, M., Keremane, M., et al. (1995) The p27 Protein Is Present at One End of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; Particles. Phytopathology, 86, 1331-1335.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, F., Du, Z., Shen, J., Yang, H. and Liao, F. (2018) Genetic Diversity and Molecular Evolution of Ornithogalum mosaic Virus Based on the Coat Protein Gene Sequence. PeerJ, 6, e4550. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4550</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alishiri, A., Rakhshandehroo, F., Zamanizadeh, H.R. and Palukaitis, P. (2013) Prevalence of Tobacco mosaic Virus in Iran and Evolutionary Analyses of the Coat Protein Gene. Plant Pathology Journal, 29, 260-273.  
https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.09.2012.0145</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abadkhah, M., Hamidi, H. and Koolivand, D. (2021) Phylogenetic and Population Analysis of Lettuce mosaic Virus Isolates Based on the Coat Protein Gene. Journal of Genetic Resources, 7, 211-219.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Folimonova, S.Y. (2020) &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt;: A Large RNA Virus with Complex Biology Turned into a Valuable Tool for Crop Protection. PLoS Pathogens, 16, e1008416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008416</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yi, L., Chen, Y., Li, S. and Huang, A. (2020) Structural and Photosynthetic Changes in ‘Gannanzao’ navel Orange Plants Infected with &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt;. Journal of Fruit Science, 37, 574-581. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Erkis-Gungor, G. and Cevik, B. (2019) Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Analysis of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; Isolates from Turkey. Advances in Virology, 2019, 7163747. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7163747</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dawson, W.O., Garnsey, S.M., Tatineni, S., Folimonova, S.Y., Harper, S.J. and Gowda, S. (2013) &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt;-Host Interactions. Frontiers in Microbiology, 4, 88. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00088</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garnsey, S.M., Permar, T.A., Cambra, M. and Henderson, C.T. (1993) Direct Tissue Blot Immunoassay (DTBIA) for Detection of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; (CTV). International Organization of Citrus Virologists Conference Proceedings, (1957-2010), 12, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.5070/C55T45Z8FB</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gillings, M., Broadbent, P., Indsto, J. and Lee, R. (1993) Characterisation of Isolates and Strains of Citrus tristeza Closterovirus Using Restriction Analysis of the Coat Protein Gene Amplified by the Polymerase Chain Reaction. Journal of Virological Methods, 44, 305-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0934(93)90065-Y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. and Tamura, K. (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35, 1547-1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mawassi, M., Mietkiewska, E., Gofman, R., Yang, G. and Bar-Joseph, M. (1996) Unusual Sequence Relationships between Two Isolates of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt;. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 77, 2359-2364.  
https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-77-9-2359</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Albiach-Marti, M.R., Mawassi, M., Gowda, S., Satyanarayana, T., Hilf, M.E., Shanker, S., et al. (2000) Sequences of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; Separated in Time and Space Are Essentially Identical. Journal of virology, 74, 6856-6865.  
https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.74.15.6856-6865.2000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harper, S.J., Dawson, T.E. and Pearson, M.N. (2010) Isolates of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; That Overcome Poncirus trifoliata Resistance Comprise a Novel Strain. Archives of Virology, 155, 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-010-0604-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suastika, C., Natsuaki, T., Terui, H., Kano, T. and Okuda, S. (2001) Nucleotide Sequence of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; Seedling Yellows Isolate. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 67, 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012992</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biswas, K.K., Tarafdar, A. and Sharma, S.K. (2012) Complete Genome Sequence of Mandarin Decline &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; of the Northeastern Himalayan Hill Region of India: Comparative Analyses Determine Recombinant. Archives of Virology, 157, 579-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-011-1165-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Melzer, M.J., Borth, W.B., Sether, D.M., Ferreira, S., Gonsalves, D. and Hu, J.S. (2010) Genetic Diversity and Evidence for Recent Modular Recombination in Hawaiian &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt;. Virus Genes, 40, 111-118.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-009-0409-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, Z., Mathews, D., Dodds, J. and Mirkov, T. (2004) Molecular Characterization of an Isolate of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; That Causes Severe Symptoms in Sweet Orange. Virus Genes, 19, 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008127224147</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roy, A. and Brlansky, R.H. (2010) Genome Analysis of an Orange Stem Pitting &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; Isolate Reveals a Novel Recombinant Genotype. Virus Research, 51, 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2010.03.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agranovsky, A.A., Koonin, E.V., Boyko, P.V., Maiss, E., Fr?tschl, R., Lunina, P.A., et al. (1994) Beet Yellows Closterovirus: Complete Genome Structure and Identification of a Leader Papa-in-Like Thiol Protease. Virology, 198, 311-324.  
https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1994.1034 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Librado, P. and Rozas, J. (2009) DnaSP v5: A Software for Comprehensive Analysis of DNA Polymorphism Data. Bioinformatics, 25, 1451-1452.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Excoffier, L., Laval, G. and Schneider, S. (2017) Arlequin (Version 3.0): An Integrated Software Package for Population Genetics Data Analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics, 1, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/117693430500100003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biswas, K.K., Palchoudhury, S., Chakraborty, P., Bhattacharyya, U.K., Ghosh, D.K., Debnath, P., et al. (2019) Codon Usage Bias Analysis of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt;: Higher Codon Adaptation to Citrus reticulata Host. Viruses, 11.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/v11040331</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xiao, C., Yao, R.X., Li, F., Dai, S.M., Licciardello, G., Catara, A., et al. (2017) Population Structure and Diversity of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; (CTV) Isolates in Hunan Province, China. Archives of Virology, 162, 409-423.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-016-3089-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ke, Z., Long, Y., Jun, Z., Bo, C. and Aijun, H. (2021) Group Composition, Genotype and Genetic Characteristics of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; Isolates from Six Citrus Cultivars in Meishan, Sichuan Province. Journal of Plant Protection, 48, 732-741.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, F., Liu, X., Du, Z., Hou, H., Wang, X., Wang, F., et al. (2019) Bayesian Phylodynamic Analysis Reveals the Dispersal Patterns of Tobacco Mosaic Virus in China. Virology, 528, 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2018.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, G., Marques, N. and Nolasco, G. (2012) The Evolutionary Rate of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; Ranks among the Rates of the Slowest RNA Viruses. Journal of General Virology, 93, 419-429. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.036574-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lopez, C., Ayllon, M.A., Navas-Castillo, J., Guerri, J., Moreno, P. and Flores, R. (1998) Molecular Variability of the 5'- and 3'-Terminal Regions of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; RNA. Phytopathology, 88, 685-691.  
https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.7.685</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biswas, K.K., Tarafdar, A., Diwedi, S. and Lee, R.F. (2012) Distribution, Genetic Diversity and Recombination Analysis of &lt;i&gt;Citrus Tristeza Virus&lt;/i&gt; of India. Virus Genes, 45, 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-012-0748-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davino, S., Panno, S., Rangel, E.A., Davino, M., Bellardi, M.G. and Rubio, L. (2012) Population Genetics of Cucumber mosaic Virus Infecting Medicinal, Aromatic and Ornamental Plants from Northern Italy. Archives of Virology, 157, 739-745.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-011-1216-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.112863-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, F., Zou, W., Xie, L. and Zhan, J. (2017) Adaptive Evolution and Demographic History Contribute to the Divergent Population Genetic Structure of Potato virus Y between China and Japan. Evolutionary Applications, 10, 379-390.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12459</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>